Marking Rubric
CRITERIA
1.
Design or redesign of an
Interact2 site with inclusion of
screenshots to support
reflections.
(20%)*
STANDARDS
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Screenshots or evidence of design or redesign of an Interact2 site
is provided in the written reflections.
There are no screenshots or evidence of design or redesign of an
Interact2 site provided in the written reflections.
The analysis and references in your justification to the learning
outcomes of your subject, the selected core items of the subject
experience survey, the diversity of your student cohort and
educational literature are clear, appropriate and coherent.
The analysis and references in your justification to the learning
outcomes of your subject, the selected core items of the subject
experience survey, the diversity of your student cohort and
educational literature are vague, not appropriate and not
coherent
Comments:
2. Clarity of analysis with
appropriate and meaningful
reference in your justification
for selecting the learning and
teaching strategies in relation
to the learning outcomes of
your subject, the selected core
items of the subject experience
survey, the diversity of your
student cohort and educational
literature.
(40%)"
Comments:
CRITERIA
3. Rationale for using the selected
educational technologies.
(20%)
STANDARDS
Satisfactory
You have a coherent rationale for using the selected educational
technologies.
Unsatisfactory
The rationale for using the selected educational technologies is
not coherent
Comments:
4. Alignment in your rationale with
the affordances of these
technologies and the diversity of
your student cohort.
(20%)
The rationale aligns well with the affordances of these
technologies and the diversity of your student cohort.
The rationale does not align well with the affordances of these
technologies and the diversity of your student cohort.
Comments:
*NB. This subject is graded SY/US. Percentage figures are indicative of the importance of each assessment criteria and do not refer to an allocation of marks.