Team Decisions ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions A team is a group of individuals who share mutual respect and are actively pursuing a common goal. ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Effective Teams Need Individuals A mixture of individual temperaments A mixture of technical skills Individual preparation is essential Individual follow-up is essential Individual buy-in is essential ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Then How Can We Get a Group of Individuals to Agree on a TEAM Decision? ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Effective Decisions Goal oriented – Specific problem – Ability to track and evaluate Open communication between team members Decision process must be known apriori and accepted by team members ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Overall Process Ingersoll-Rand – – – – – – – IDEAS-IR Identify the real problem Define the problem Evaluate the impact Analyze causes Select solutions Implement solution Results and tracking ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Identify the Real Problem Type – – – – I - Team has complete control Ability to define the problem Ability to collect pertinent information Expertise to solve Authority to implement solution Type II - Team has limited control – May lack authority to implement – Can influence ultimate decision maker Type III – Team has no control ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Define the Problem Write a clear Problem Statement – must identify an expected level of performance – should help identify the five W’s and H for solutions Who? What? When? Where? Why? How? Avoid “lack of” statements that invite instant narrow solutions By clearly defining your problem, you are halfway to solving it ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Generate Solutions Practical experience Sage advice – – – – Customers Shop personnel Manufacturing staff Old-timers Reverse engineering Brainstorming ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Serial Brainstorming Clearly identify the problem at hand Take turns in sequence – one idea per turn Record the information as given – do not paraphrase Suspend judgment – do not criticize ideas or people – wild ideas can stimulate breakthroughs Do not discuss ideas – simply generate them Everyone participates but OK to pass Benefits - helps refine ideas and build consensus Drawbacks - can lead to narrow solutions ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Parallel Brainstorming Clearly identify the problem at hand Silently generate and write down a list of ideas Share the lists and continue to generate ideas as they occur Suspend judgment – do not criticize ideas or people – wild ideas can stimulate breakthroughs Strive for a multitude of ideas Benefits – promotes piggy-backing on prior ideas Drawbacks – difficult to grasp many new ideas at once ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Affinity Grouping Clearly identify the problem at hand Silently write ideas, one per Post-It or notecard, using seven words or fewer Share the cards with the group and SILENTLY move the cards to form closely related idea groups If disagreement exists when grouping, make copies of the contested card(s) Label each group with a header card reflecting theme Decide if singletons should be kept or discarded Benefits – helps build consensus for similar concepts Drawbacks – minimal piggy-backing ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Traditional Majority Solutions Collect ideas or brainstorm Vote on preferred choices Tally the votes Check for consensus ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Selecting Solutions Process Advantages Disadvantages Justification Unanimous High commitment Seldom happens Members all agree Consensus High creativity High commitment Takes time Commitment & creativity are critical Majority Quick Low creativity Medium commitment Little time for decision Minority Quick Low creativity Low commitment No time to consult others ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Multivoting Builds consensus Vote for multiple ideas Secret or open Number of votes per person Single or weighted votes Sequential versus consensus elimination ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Single Multivoting, Sequential Elimination Each person gets an unlimited number of single votes for as many ideas as they like Retain any ideas that received any votes Critically discuss remaining alternatives Each person votes again, but may only vote for half of the remaining ideas Repeat until only 3 ideas remain As a final step, each member is allowed only one vote ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Weighted Multivoting, Consensus Elimination Count the number of ideas and divide by three Each person gets that many votes Each person distributes their votes to select preferences No more than 3 votes per person per solution List alternatives in new priority order Critically discuss top alternatives and stubborn remainders Eliminate ideas only by consensus or those solutions outside the control of the team Repeat ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Pitfalls to Avoid Poor identification of the real problem that should have been solved Process – Considering only 1 or 2 alternatives, often proposed by the most assertive team members, resulting in lack of confidence and commitment by the others – Lack of apriori agreement on the voting process Lack of evaluation methodology within the solution itself Lack of consensus and personal buy-in ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Anticipating Problems Stong FACILITATOR Make team members aware of behaviors that detract from team effectiveness – condescension, stubbornness, indifference Develop strategies for equitable voting ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Effective Decisions – Summary Advance preparation Individuals are important to a good team – Conflict can be constructive Strong FACILITATOR Respect ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Team Individuals Respect Pursue Common ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions goal