Category Improvement Worksheet Institution: North Central State College City & State: Mansfield, Ohio Identify one AQIP Category that your institution would like to target for focused improvement (in the form of a campaign consisting of one or more Action Projects. Category 4 Valuing People Within this Category, identify a significant challenge — one or two processes or performance results data that you consider targets for change. Training and development of faculty and staff to better meet the needs of a changing student population Professional development plans to assist in budget development and tied to strategic plan Graduate education for adjunct faculty to qualify them to teach in their fields Which specific opportunities for improvement (identified as O or OO in your Systems Appraisal) are core to this challenge? 4P4b is an OO that states, “There is no comprehensive policy or developmental goals that address professional development.” 4P3c is an O that states, “Historically, the strategic planning process has not encouraged high performance or empowerment for each employee. 4P5 is an OO that states, “The College has an opportunity to accrue immense benefits (e.g. satisfying critical needs) from using a more evidence-based, inclusive process for creating professional development plans. Without evidence professional development plans can be viewed as uncertain and unclear leading to an environment without trust. What feedback from other external sources (consultant reports, other accreditation reports, research studies, etc.) reinforce your conclusion that this Category represents a key challenge for your institution? The University System of Ohio strategic plan directs community colleges to serve more students, including those requiring remediation, and increase retention and graduation rates. The HLC faculty credential requirements Program specific accreditation requirements related to faculty credentials What feedback from internal sources (performance results data, complaints, system breakdowns, etc.) reinforce your conclusion that this Category represents a key challenge for your institution? 2007 email survey on professional development expressed dissatisfaction AQIP Strategic Issues Survey Report May 2008 – professional development identified as a priority Manager’s Advisory Council, Faculty Caucus, Staff Caucus, Planning Advisory Council, President’s Staff, AQIP Steering Committee, Achieving the Dream Core Team, Council of Deans all independently supported Category 4 Valuing People – Adjunct Faculty Professional Development, an Action Project launched 12/07 has yielded some success, provides an opportunity to build on that success Identified as area needing improvement at annual Board of Trustees planning retreat Focus groups conducted by Foundation informally identified need for improvement in professional development plan/processes Achieving the Dream data identified student cohorts that are underserved 1998 NCA accreditation report indicated that some NC State faculty did not meet [Type a q documen interestin position t in the doc Box Tool formattin box.] credentialing requirements. In 2008-09, 100% of full-time faculty meet requirements, 60% of adjunct faculty meet requirements. When did you become aware of the need to develop a strategy to address this challenge? What is stimulating you to confront it now? The Achieving the Dream Core Team discussed this challenge from the perspective of 1) possible development of a faculty development curriculum similar to the one at Brazosport and 2) the need for in-service professional development to help further the vision, mission and institutional priorities of the college. We continue to see inconsistent frequency, content and quality of professional development and training of faculty and staff. The AQIP Strategic Issues Survey Report May 2008 identified professional development as a top priority for improvement. Training efforts of the instructional technology/distance learning group have extended into pedagogy, have identified a need for a more systematic training and professional development for faculty. New hires who will be replacing retiring faculty and staff will need orientation and training. The HLC faculty credentials audit is pending – the challenge is for the College to hire/retain qualified adjunct faculty, especially with the launching of the AA and AS degrees. Which specific needs of your students, other external stakeholders, faculty, or staff could you meet better if you addressed this challenge? How? Improve the student learning experience and student success through better development of faculty and staff as facilitators of learning; support those adjunct faculty with a record of good service to the college. How might addressing this challenge change or strengthen your institution’s quality culture and infrastructure? Addressing this challenge can strengthen the quality culture if there are expectations and measurable outcomes tied to completion of professional development objectives. High quality professional development program empowers faculty and staff, especially if incentives and rewards are built in based on post-training performance. It will be important that we also understand stakeholders’ needs as we pursue this challenge, and align planning for this project/initiative with the College’s strategic plan. It will prove that the College values its people by valuing their professional growth and development What enthusiasm and support exists among your leadership and employees for addressing this challenge now? The faculty has shown some interest in this. Adjunct faculty has been supportive of the current Adjunct Faculty Professional Development project and are interested in pursuing their graduate education. Staff is not as vocal about it but is not opposed either. Senior leadership is excited about it. Identify two processes or performance results measures included in this Category that you consider significant current strengths (e.g., identified as S or SS in your Systems Appraisal) that might prove useful in addressing this challenge. The technology training program, the Valuing Adjunct Faculty Professional Development project. What ideas have you already come up with for potential Action Projects that might help address this challenge? (Provide 3- 6) Develop a comprehensive policy addressing professional development at the College. Create a professional development program.