NYUSteinhardt DEPARTMENT OF MUSIC AND PERFORMING ARTS PROFESSIONS PROGRAM IN EDUCATIONAL THEATRE 82 WASHINGTON SQUARE EAST, PLESS ANNEX 223 NEW YORK, NY 10003-6680 TELEPHONE: 212.998.5869 FAX: 212.995.4192 EMAIL: dm635@nyu.edu Supervised Student Teaching in the Secondary English/Drama Classroom: MPAET.UE.1174/MPAET.GE 2174, Spring 2011 Instructor: David Montgomery Meeting times: Wed., 4:55-6:35 Office Hours: Please make an appointment through the Ed Theatre Office by calling (212) 998-5868 Location: Education 770 Course Description: Through examining readings, case studies and their own praxis, student teachers will deepen their understanding of teaching and learning. Beyond exploring curriculum and instructional strategies, issues of classroom management, preparation, implementation, and assessment will be addressed. Additionally, this seminar will serve as a forum for student teachers to share their successes and challenges in their placements. Course Objectives To identify individual goals and questions about teaching and learning that will be explored through coursework and classroom field placements. To create lesson plans and unit plans focused on dramatic activities in the secondary classroom that meet the New York State education standards To develop a case narrative. To develop an understanding of arts integration with other core subject areas, as well as an understanding of how to teach theatre skills. To explore the various elements involved in producing a theatrical performance in a school setting. To understand and implement effective strategies of assessment for drama. To exercise creative and analytic skills through journal responses to readings and classroom experiences. To hone skills as teachers and reflective practitioners through an exploration of individual learning styles, as well as culturally responsive and critical pedagogies. To generate a teaching portfolio of classroom observations, lesson plans, unit plans, and responses to the semester’s work, and to use that portfolio to highlight individual strengths as educators and artists. Required Texts: Norris, J., L. McCammon, & C. Miller (editors). (2000) Learning to Teach Drama: A Case Narrative Approach. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Patterson, J. & D.M. Cook & M. Swick. Theatre in the Secondary Classroom: Methods and Strategies for the Beginning Teacher. New York: Heinemann Drama, 2006. Recommended Texts: Neelands, J.. & Goode, T. (1990). Structuring Drama Work: A Handbook of Available Forms in Theatre Drama. New York: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, P. (2000). The Drama Classroom: Action, Reflection, Transformation. New York: Routledge/Falmer. and Course Work and Assessment A significant portion of the work for this course has to do with the time that you spend in your student teaching placement each week. We come together in the seminar meetings to discuss your experiences in those placements and to enhance your pedagogical knowledge base through an exploration of important teaching and learning concepts and practices that are necessary for all arts educators to master. A breakdown of course work follows below. Students are responsible for the following requirements: Student Teaching Field Placements: (1) Each participant will receive an assignment to student teach in a middle or high school in New York City for the duration of the semester. All students are required to teach through the end of the NYU semester. Students are expected to commit a minimum of three full days, or five half days per week to their placements. (2) You will be assigned a field supervisor who will be in contact with your seminar instructor and your cooperating teacher throughout the semester to monitor your progress. There is a formative visit where a supervisor will introduce you to the school and your cooperating teacher. Each student is responsible for arranging two visits with her/his field supervisor and her/his cooperating teacher throughout the semester. We refer to these visits as diagnostic and summative. The diagnostic visit provides an opportunity for the supervisor and the cooperating teacher to evaluate and critique the practical aspects of your teaching. The summative visit entails an evaluation of progress and reflection on future teaching goals. For each visit, the student must provide the field supervisor with lesson plans for her/his teaching at least 24 hours in advance of the visit. Students are responsible for teaching and submitting at least three stand-alone lessons in the placements. (3) Any repeated lateness or failure to report for scheduled student teaching times will adversely affect your final grade for the course. Absences from student teaching should occur only in an extreme emergency, and you must always contact your cooperating teacher and your supervisor to let them know that you will be absent. (4) Any unforeseen conflicts that may arise within your placements must be brought to the attention of your field supervisor and seminar instructor immediately. Teaching Journal: (1) Each participant will chronicle her/his thoughts and ideas about the coursework and student teaching experience by generating a teaching journal. These journals must include a minimum of one journal entry per week, which should document your individual growth throughout the semester, and must make connections between the course readings, discussions, and your classroom teaching practice. You may also make connections with other aspects of your life and work as a student. You should use the journal as a source of data collection for your ongoing research in teaching and learning. This will be an important resource to consult as you prepare your case narrative project for this course (see below for more details about the case narrative assignment). (2) Journal entries may take various forms: written/typed, visual, aural (recorded so that it can be listened to), etc., and they can be varied throughout the semester. Also, please title your entries, just as you would title any piece of art, and provide a description or written analysis if necessary. (3) You will share selected journal entries at various points during the semester in class. (4) You will also be responsible for providing feedback to your classmates on lesson plans, unit plans, journal responses and other course-related work. Case Narrative Assignment: A case narrative offers an opportunity to reflect on and examine a problem, dilemma, or crisis, or frame a new perspective that has occurred in a teaching practice. In a sense, it is a story which describes not only the events that led up to the problem, or event, but also provides the classroom context in which the situation occurred. The text, Learning to Teach Drama: A Case Narrative Approach opens up a wide array of lenses through which to explore our work as drama/theatre teachers. Norris, McCammon and Miller use the following chapter headings to categorize the case narratives in the book: Planning Lessons Knowing the Students Classroom Climate: Working with Groups Classroom Climate: Working with Individuals Drama in the School Community Expect the Unexpected Student Teaching Experience Using the format followed by the authors, and selecting one type of case narrative, your assignment is to develop a case narrative reflecting on some aspect of your teaching in your field placement this semester. A case narrative in your student teaching context can be about a group activity, an individual student, or it can deal with lesson planning, behavior management, process work or production challenges. The main intent of the cases is to serve as a tool to assist you in better understanding your teaching practice, and should be drawn from your own experience. Each student will write a 5-6 page (double spaced) narrative reflecting on their experience using journal entries and field observations to inform the writing exercise. On November 16, you will be asked to share your narrative with a partner in class. This is an opportunity to share feedback, suggestions, advice, and general empathy if we have ever been in similar situations as educators. It can also be seen as an introduction to issues in education that we have yet to come across. The case should come from a question or concern that has arisen in your current student teaching placement. In choosing an experience, you might ask, “What do I want to better understand?” You should write in the first person, give your final opinion in your summary, and reflect on how this case will affect or give insight to your future teaching practice. A final written Narrative will be due to the instructor in your Teaching Portfolio on December 7. Lesson and Unit Plans: (1) You will be expected to create three distinct lesson plans, each dealing with a different theme or area of study. These lesson plans should relate to the existing curriculum in your student teaching placement. (2) You will also create a unit plan made up of three to five related lesson plans on the same subject. Both lesson and unit plans should include: Goal/Objective Audience/Developmental Considerations Previous Knowledge Organization Materials Procedures with time breakdowns Modifications Assessment Reflection New York State Learning Standards New York City Department of Education Blueprint Strands and corresponding grade level Benchmark. 3 stand alone lesson plans are due on October 26 to be shared with a partner in class, and the unit plan is due to be shared with a partner in class on November 9. Final edits/products of lessons and units will be included and evaluated in the portfolio due Friday, December 7. Teaching Portfolio: Throughout the semester you will be assembling selections of your work into a portfolio, which includes the teaching journal, lesson and unit plans, case narrative assignment, and self-assessments mentioned above. This portfolio must illustrate your growth as an arts educator, hence the journaling throughout the experience. It may help to think about the portfolio as a teaching and learning document that provides a “picture” of your work in this course to someone outside of the class, like a friend, another professor, and most importantly, a potential employer. A well-organized and well-presented portfolio will help you to be more effective in providing evidence for your final grade and will assist you in gaining employment. Portfolios can include, but are not limited to, the following sections: Table of Contents Resumes (both Teaching and Dramatic/Theatrical) Statement of Teaching Philosophy Initial Goals and Questions Case Narrative Project Rubrics Evaluation/reflection on how you worked with your cooperating teacher Drama Strategies and Activities for the Secondary Classroom 3 Stand Alone Lesson Plans Mini-unit Plan made up of three to four related lesson plans on the same subject. Criteria for Assessment: The portfolio includes all of the elements listed in the course outline. The portfolio captures the student’s teaching experience in the high school classroom, both in description and analysis. The elements within the portfolio illustrate improvement and/or learning over the course of the semester. The portfolio reflects the individual’s personality in some way. The portfolio is organized and presented in such a way that it is useful for the creator, while also accessible for an outside reader. Portfolios which contain your final self-assessments are due December 7. Final Review: Each student will schedule a meeting with the seminar instructor during the final week of the semester, December 9-16. In that meeting the student’s work and growth throughout the semester will be discussed. The written final assessment will serve as the basis for this meeting, and the portfolio will serve as supplemental evidence for the final assessment. Please note that I will be keeping my own notes for each participant in the course, based on what I observe each week during our class meetings, in your student teaching placement, and what I see and read in your assignments and responses throughout the semester. I will also consult on a regular basis with your NYU student teaching supervisor, and their comments will be taken into consideration during the final review meeting. Ongoing Assignment Preparation and In-class Participation At various times during the course, you will be asked to complete assignments that will lead to the creation of your student teaching portfolio. These assignments will be assessed informally, meaning that you will receive feedback from the instructor and from a peer, but you will not receive a grade per se. However, the expectation is that you will complete these assignments to the best of your ability and that they will be submitted on time and free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. The informal assessment is meant to provide feedback so that your final portfolio can be as strong as possible. You are also expected to actively participate in seminar discussions and the peer feedback process. Deficiencies in any of the areas described above will adversely affect the Ongoing Assignment Preparation and In-class Participation portion of your overall course grade. Please note: Absences and/or tardiness to seminar meetings and your student teaching placement will also reflect poorly on this assessment area as well. Self-Assessment You will be required to complete an initial self-assessment at the top of the semester and a final self-assessment at the conclusion of the semester. The initial assessment will involve composing a personal history and identifying your goals and questions for the semester (3 to 5 pages; double-spaced, 12 font). For the final assessment you will write a 1500 word essay that evaluates your work in the course, reports on your progress in reaching your goals and answering your questions, and provides specific examples as evidence of learning. You will assign yourself a letter grade for the learning that you feel you have achieved. That grade will stand for the self-assessment portion of your overall grade as long as you provide evidence to support WHY you deserve that grade in your final self-assessment. If your evidence is in conflict with the grade that you have assigned yourself, based on my observation of your work in the seminar and/or your NYU supervisor’s and classroom teacher’s observations of you in your student teaching placement, your grade will be adjusted accordingly. Please note that this portion of the course assessment is not only about doing. Attending student teaching, coming to class, participating in discussions, and completing the assignments do not constitute learning. These all represent opportunities for learning to take place. As you consider your work in this course for the self-assessment, please make sure that you consider the depth of your learning through the following lenses: Awareness, Connections, and Ownership. What are you own personal examples of new awareness, connections, and ownership? How has your knowledge and understanding shifted as a result of your work in this course? How have you changed as an educator? As an artist? What new questions have emerged because of this experience? What evidence can you provide that supports your assertions about your learning? What are the sources of evidence that you can use in your self-assessment to capture the learning experience? “A” work is not simply coming to all classes, turning in assignments on time, and completing all the requirements. This portion of your assessment is meant to encourage you to explore questions and ideas that are important to you, as well as to convey moments of learning that may not have been measured by the other assessment tools used for the other projects. In this class in particular, your individual learning while working in your student teaching placement will be difficult for me to measure. It is your responsibility to articulate and assess that learning in the final self-assessment. Please keep in mind that assessment is not an end of the course assignment. It is essential that you continually reflect on your learning throughout the semester. Initial self-assessments due on September 14 Final self-assessments due in portfolio on December 7 Assessment Breakdown Course assignments will have the following values for the overall grade in the course: Ongoing assignment preparation and in-class participation Portfolio Final Self-Assessment TOTAL 20% 40% 40% 100% Grading Scale: 93% and up:A 90-92%: A88-89%: B+ 83-87%: B 80-82%: B- 78-79%: C+ 73-77%: C 70-72%: C68-69%: D+ 63-67%: D 62% and less: F Formal assessment of certain assignments will be based on rubrics and/or checklists that I provide in advance so that assessment criteria and expectations are clear. In some instances, participants may be asked to suggest assessment criteria for a given project or paper. The work in this course requires personal motivation, passion for exploration, risk-taking, and most importantly, an openness to new ideas, thoughts, and feelings. It also demands attendance at all class meetings, plus a professional commitment to your student teaching placement school, cooperating teacher(s), and students. Attendance and promptness are mandatory There is no extra credit available for this course. Official university excused absences must be documented. If you know you will be missing class, advance notification via email would be appreciated. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Culminating Experience: Masters candidates who are in the final semester of student teaching are required to complete a Culminating Experience, which consists of a research project informed by the student’s experience in the student teaching field placement. This project will be designed by the student in consultation with the advisor of the EDTA program, Joe Salvatore. ETSS students will be advised by me, David Montgomery. Final Review: Each student will schedule a meeting with her/his student teaching seminar instructor during the week of December 9-16. In that meeting we will discuss your work and your growth throughout the semester. Your final assessment will serve as the basis for this meeting, and the portfolio will serve as additional evidence to support your final assessment. Please note that the instructor and supervisors will be keeping notes for each student in the course, based on what we observe each week during our class meetings, in your student teaching placement, and what we see and read in your responses throughout the semester. These notes and observations will help us to guide each participant’s progress in the course. Instructors and supervisors will also meet at the end of the semester to discuss each student’s work and progress in the course. We will all be available for individual consultations throughout the semester. Academic Honesty You are responsible for knowing the University’s issued standards of academic honesty outlined in the student handbook. While the nature of this course demands that you discuss ideas and opinions with fellow participants, your writing and other individual work must be something that you do on your own. Please also note that you may not hand in the same paper for two or more courses without the expressed consent of all instructors involved. Email Communication Each participant must have an active NYU email account that they check on a regular basis. This is the easiest way for the instructors and supervisors to communicate with you regarding last minute changes and for you to contact them regarding questions and concerns about the coursework. Emails will often be sent through the collective User Groups in Blackboard. Since this is the interface available to instructors and supervisors, an outside email account will not be acceptable for the purposes of this class. Students must use their NYU e-mail address as their official email address. Do You Have Any Particular Needs? Please let me know if there is anything I should be aware of regarding you and a particular need or characteristic, such as a medical condition, an early pregnancy, a sensory or hidden disability, etc. that may influence our interactions, your participation, or your personal well-being. I want to make the course as inclusive as possible, so I’d appreciate your communication to keep me informed about you. Open Door Policy It is my every intention to create a safe environment and a comfortable learning community for everyone in the class. If at any time you feel unsafe or uncomfortable, please feel free to address these issues with me. I would suggest setting up a time to speak to me during my office hours, and if my available times conflict with your other obligations, please email me with other possible times that might work for you, and we’ll make an appointment. Course Itinerary **(subject to change) September 7 Introduction, review syllabus and self-assessment, discussion of expectations and placements, and team building September 14 Observing in the classroom: teaching style, classroom management style, demographics, and objectives of the cooperating teacher Reading Due: ‘Introduction’ in Learning to Teach Drama Assignment Due: Initial self-assessments/goals and questions due in class September 21 How does the student teacher make a contribution? National Theatre Standards Reading Due: Chapter 1 in Theatre in the Secondary Classroom. September 28 Knowing the students and working with groups Reading Due: Chapters 1 through 3 in Learning to Teach Drama Assignment Due: Share a journal entry in class October 5 Planning Reading Due: Chapter 2 in Theatre in the Secondary School Classroom; Chapter 7 in Learning to Teach Drama October 12 Assessment /Rubrics Reading Due: Chapters 3 and 4 in Theatre in the Secondary School Classroom October 19 The High School Production Reading Due: Chapters 7 through 9 from Theatre in the Secondary School Classroom; Read “The Time is Out of Joint: Play Production in the Secondary Classroom,” page 74 in Learning to Teach Drama October 26 Working with Individual Students Reading Due: Chapter 4 in Learning to Teach Drama Assignment Due: Three Stand Alone Lesson Plans shared with a partner in class. November 2 Sharing perspectives What is “best practice”? Reading Due: Chapter 6 in Theatre in the Secondary School Classroom November 9 Unit Plan Share Assignment Due: Unit plans due to be shared with partner in class November 16 Case Narratives Reading Due: Chapter 6 and Appendix A, B, & C in Learning to Teach Drama Assignment Due: Case narratives shared with partner. November 23 (no class scheduled) November 30 Portfolio Sharing Assignment Due: Sharing portfolios in class for feedback December 7 Interviewing for jobs Assignment Due: Portfolios and final self-assessments turned in December 14 Wrap Up Individual Student meetings scheduled BIBLIOGRPAHY Drama in Education Sources Bolton, Gavin. Towards a theory of drama in education. Burnt Mill, Essex: Longman, 1979. Booth, David & Chuck Lundy. Improvisation. Don Mills: Academic Press, 1985. ---. Story drama: Reading, writing and roleplaying across the curriculum. Markham: Pembroke, 1984. Grady, Sharon. Drama and Diversity: A Pluralistic Perspective forEducational Drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2000. Heathcote, Dorothy. Collected Writings on Education and Drama. Eds. Liz Johnson and Cecily O’Neill. Evanston: Northwestern, UP, 1984. McCaslin, Nellie. Creative Drama in the Classroom and Beyond, 6th.ed. NY: Longman, 1996. Neelands, Jonothan and Warwick Dobson. Drama and Theatre Studies at AS/A Level. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2000. Neelands, Jonothan. Making Sense of Drama. London: Heinemann, 1984. ---. Structuring Drama Work. London: Heinemann, 1990. ---. Learning through imagined experience. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1992. Nicholson, Helen. Theatre, Education and Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. O’Neill, Cecily & Alan Lambert. Drama Structures. London: Hutchinson, 1982. ---. Drama Worlds. London: Heinemann, 1995. Saxton, Juliana and Carole S. Miller. Into the Story: Language In Action Through Drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2004. Spolin, Viola. Theater Games for the Classroom: A Teacher’s Handbook. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1986. Schneider, J.J. and T.P. Crumpler and T. Rogers. Process Drama for Multiple Literacies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2006. Schonmann, Shifra (Ed). Key Concepts in Theatre/Drama Education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 2011. Weigler, Will. Strategies for Playbuilding: Helping Groups Translate Issues into Theatre. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2001. Theatre of the Oppressed Sources Boal, Augusto. Games for Actors and Non-actors. NY: Routledge, 1992. Rohd, Michael. Theatre for Community, Conflict & Dialogue: The Hope is Vital Training Manual. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1998. General Theatre Sources Bogart, Anne. A Director Prepares: Seven Essays on Art and Theatre. NY: Routledge, 2001. Campbell, Drew. Technical Theater for Nontechnical People. NY: Allworth, 2004. Johnstone, Keith. Impro for Storytellers. London: Faber & Faber, 1999. Arts Education Resources Cornett, Claudia C. Creating Meaning Through Literacy and the Arts. Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2003. Fowler, Charles. Strong Arts, Strong Schools: The Promising Potential and Shortsighted Disregard of the Arts in American Schooling. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1996. Greene, Maxine. Variations on a Blue Guitar. NY: Teachers College Press, 2001. General Education Resources Ayers, William C. and Janet L. Miller, eds. A Light in Dark Times: Maxine Greene and the Unfinished Conversation. NY: Teachers College P, 1998. Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of Hope. NY: Continuum, 2002. ---. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. NY: Seabury Press, 1991. ---. Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare to Teach. Trans. Donaldo Macedo, Dale Koike, and Alexandre Oliveira. Boulder: Westview, 1998. Gardner, Howard. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. NY: Basic Books, 1983. ---. The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think & How Schools Should Teach. NY: Basic, 1991. hooks, bell. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. NY: Routledge, 1994. Kozol, Jonathan. On Being a Teacher. Oxford: Oneworld, 1981. Schon, Donald A. Educating the Reflexive Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1987. Adolescents, Multi-cultural, and Secondary School Education Resources Corwin, Miles. And Still We Rise: The Trials and Triumphs of Twelve Gifted Inner-City Students. Los Angeles: Perennial, 1997. Delpit, Lisa. Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. NY: New, 1995. Delpit, Lisa and Joanne Kilgour Dowdy, eds. The Skin That We Speak: Thoughts on Language and Culture in the Classroom. NY: New, 2002. Flores-González, Nilda. School Kids/Street Kids: Identity Development in Latino Students. New York: Teachers College P, 2002. Garrod, Andrew, Lisa Smulyan, Sally I. Powers, Robert Kilkenny, comps. Adolescent Portraits: Identity, Relationships, and Challenges. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1992. Hersch, Patricia. A Tribe Apart: A Journey into the Heart of American Adolescence. NY: Ballantine, 1998. Lesko, Nancy. Act Your Age! A Cultural Construction of Adolescence. NY: Routledge/Falmer, 2001. McLoyd, Vonnie C. and Laurence Steinberg, eds. Studying Minority Adolescents: Conceptual, Methodological, and Theoretical Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998. Nieto, Sonia. The Light in Their Eyes: Creating Multicultural Learning Communities. NY: Teachers College P, 1999. Patnaik, Gayatri, and Michelle T. Shinseki, eds. The Secret Life of Teens: Young People Speak Out About Their Lives. San Francisco: Harper, 2000. Romo, Harriet D. and Toni Falbo. Latino High School Graduation: Defying the Odds. Austin: U of Texas P, 1996. Valdés, Guadalupe. Con Respeto: Bridging the Distances Between Culturally Diverse Families and Schools – An Ethnographic Portrait. NY: Teachers College P, 1996. Way, Niobe. Everyday Courage: The Lives and Stories of Urban Teenagers. NY: New York UP, 1998.