Defending Difference in Higher Education Pedagogies Penny Jane Burke Professor of Education Director, Paulo Freire Institute-UK Formations of Gender & HE Pedagogies (GaP) • funded by the Higher Education Academy’s National Teaching Fellowship Scheme • Participatory Methodology: – – – – in-depth interviews (64 students), 16 focus group interviews with students & lecturers a 20 observations of pedagogical practices intensive forums, workshops & seminars, designed to promote reflexivity through critical discussion symbolic violence • [Shame] exists with reference to how we anticipate others may see and reject us’ – but it is experienced as internalized disappointment with self i.e. it exists with reference to how we judge our own shortcomings, feelings of failure or inadequacy (Raphael Reed et al, 2007: 19). Dividing practices • Foucault explains that – ‘the subject is either divided inside himself or divided from others. […] Examples are the mad and the sane, the sick and the healthy, the criminals and the “good boys”’ (Foucault, 1997: 326) • Dividing practices are “related to the political ambition to govern, was made possible by pedagogy, education, sociology, psychology and statistics” (Fejes, 2008: 90). Naming & shaming • I think the government has set this unrealistic goal of having fifty percent of the population go through university. Now that inevitably means a massive proportion of people at university today probably shouldn’t be here, and from my experience I can think of several people who obviously shouldn’t be at university, and call me very, you can say I’m being very harsh there, I probably am, but the simple fact is I don’t think they should be here, I don’t think they are bright enough. But I think that’s what it comes down to, this perception that lecturers should adapt to students, it shouldn’t be that way. Students should adapt to the lecturers, students should have the intelligence to adapt to their lecturers, and they should just have the simple respect and not talk in the back of the class (Male student 1, Sports Science). Aiming high • I would say, it sounds so bad, I would say like maybe eighty percent, this is just me, this is a guestimate, eighty percent of people who come from a lower class, whose parents didn’t go to university, might not address learning in general with as quite a passion as those who maybe came from middleclass, or those who had their parents who went to university. Like going back to what I said when I came here I saw university as the way to finish it, because college wasn’t. I went to a secondary school which although it was state it was quite top end, we had the PM’s children there, and from there you always had high expectations bred into that sort of way of thinking. You moved into that way of thinking, that that is the way forward, and that is a normal thing to do, whereas people who went to other schools might not see it like that, like some say oh, I can get a job without a degree, they don’t really…or they say I only need three GCSEs, they don’t aim for high enough because they don’t know any higher (Male Student 2, Sports Science). Disciplining difference • • • • • • • • F1: It should reach the point that they get sent out. Or they shouldn’t be allowed to come, to give an example of people coming twenty minutes late with their iPod headphones in, and continue listening to their iPod in the back, and, you know, why are you taking it? There’s no point you being here, just get out the class. M1: The lecturers always stop short of sending them out of the class, and that’s what they should do, if it happened one time where they get sent out straight away without any warning it would never happen again. Int: Why do you think the students are behaving like this, do you know? M1 Because they are idiots. M2 It sort of relates to when I was in college, because the same thing happened in college. You’d get people who would come in, not really knowing what they were doing, then sit in the class and just waste time. Int: But if they are paying all this money…Why are they just throwing it away? M2: They are not that bright. (Focus group discussion, all white students, 2 female and 2 male) Habitus & embodied identities • Oppression is “deeply rooted in psychological and physical dispositions” (McNay, 2008: 181). • Habitus is the incorporation of “the regularities and tendencies of the world into the body” (McNay, 2008: 181). • Practice is the “product of power relations that have been internalized into the body and also of an active engagement with social structures” (McNay, 2008: 182). • Embodied subjects are situated within a “given set of relations that comprise distinct spheres of social action’, or ‘fields’” (McNay, 2008: 182). embodied identities • “We need to think how bodies are being inscribed simultaneously by different symbolic systems; how inscription attributes difference and how we learn to interpret bodies through the different perspectives to which we have access” (Beverly Skeggs). politics of misrecognition • But it’s impossible to educate, you know, in the sense that we don’t have time to sit down and navel gaze about how we can engage these people better in order to do this, that and the other or do we look right back at our admissions criteria and say, ‘ok, we only choose the ones who are like us.’? (Female lecturer) Teaching Inclusively