Purpose Cryopreservative techniques lacking with adhered cells Isolated cells have the best survival rate (highs >90%) Improved preservation techniques for adhered cells is a step towards preservation of tissues Move towards freezing of organs in the future, virtually eliminating waiting lists Research Goal Develop a device to quickly and accurately measure hydraulic cell membrane permeability in adherent cells Adherent cells respond differently to standard cryopreservation procedures Most methods focus on suspended cells Current method used for adherent cells (fluorescence quenching) inconvenient Cryopreservation Main problem with cryopreservative procedures is cells dying in the process Virtually all cell deaths occur during cooling and warming phases 2 main mechanisms of cell injury / death Cryopreservation (cont.) Intracellular Ice Ice crystals form during cooling, can damage organelles and membranes within the cell Upon warming, crystals melt, causing damage from osmotic effects Extracellular Ice As extracellular solution freezes, remaining unfrozen solution concentrates Osmotic pressure draws water out of the cell, dehydrating the cell, or damaging it from excessive shrinkage Cryopreservation (cont.) Slow cooling rates cause extracellular ice formation Fast rates form intracellular ice For best survival rates, median optimal cooling rate needs to be determined Different rates for different types of cells Membrane permeability determines this rate Methods Cell membranes resist electric current Adhere cells to wall of flow chamber, flow electrolyte solution through, current will pass through the solution, over the cells Solution Current Cells Methods (cont.) Resistance in the chamber is proportional to the volume of the cells Cells expand, channel shrinks, resistance increases, and vice versa Swollen cells, large R Shrunken cells, small R Methods (cont.) Cell swelling/shrinking induced by flowing isotonic soln. over cells, then quickly switching to anisotonic soln. Measure change in voltage across chamber, calculate change in resistance, which is proportional to change in cell volume Measure elapsed time for change in cell volume, calculate cell membrane permeability Experimental Setup Cell membrane permeability is temperature dependent All solutions passed through heat exchanger to insure constant temperature throughout system Heat Exchanger “Shell” Inlets - solutions of varying tonicities Tubing coils Outlet Flow chamber: 19 x 3 x 0.1 mm, on underside of heat exchanger Water bath at 37°C Old Exchanger Design Problems Shell too small to accommodate sufficient tubing Polycarbonate not fully transparent Too tall for microscopy Leaks Scale = ~2 in. New Exchanger Design Fixes problems with old design Allows for versatility Front edge length = 4.5 in. Electrical Experiments Testing resistance of various solutions and dimensions of the flow chamber Most work has been explaining various anomalies in the data Electrical noise from various sources, air bubbles, other aspects Goal: to establish baseline to compare tests of cells to Know what to expect (and avoid) during cell testing Resistance Measurements Electrode Polarization Occurs at current carrying electrodes in an electrolyte solution Charged electrodes attract ions of opposite charge from solution Ions form “wall” around electrode, making it harder for current to push through More ions accumulate over time, so resistance will also gradually increase over time Electrode Polarization (cont.) Four electrode setup Two electrodes carry current, two measure resistance Ions build up, but measurement electrodes unaffected Can keep current DC circuit (mostly) intact Need to accommodate extra electrodes AC circuit Electrodes alternate sign at a given frequency Ions are alternately attracted and repelled, so no buildup Will have to create new circuit Resistance measurement changes Will only need two electrodes Fluorescence Quenching Comparison to resistance tests Cells loaded with calcein AM, a fluorescent molecule Time lapse taken of cells as iso/hyper/isotonic solutions flowed over cells Computer software used to measure intensity Hypertonic solutions cause cells to shrink, decreasing fluorescence intensity Increased solute concentrations allow for other molecules to interact with calcein AM and “steal” the energy otherwise used to fluoresce Fluorescence Quenching (cont.) Effects of Cytochalasin D Cytochalasin D disrupts the cellular cytoskeleton by interfering with actin polymerization Two F-actin (polymerized actin) strands form a helix called a microfilament, which provides the cytoskeletal structure Testing via fluorescence quenching to see if cytochalasin D affects membrane permeability Cytoskeleton of mouse embryo fibroblasts en.wikipedia.org Effect of Cytochalasin D (cont.) Normal Cells Cells w/ Cytochalasin D Future Work Redesign cytochalasin D experiments so cells don’t shear off, analyze data to see if there is any effect on permeability After sufficient fluorescence quenching data has been taken, integrate electrodes Proceed to taking electrical resistance data, hope that it matches the fluorescence data Acknowledgements Dr. Adam Higgins HHMI & Dr. Kevin Ahern Pete and Rosalie Johnson, The Johnson Scholarship & Dr. Skip Rochefort Logan, Crystal, Robert, Alyson