Looking at data: distributions - Displaying distributions with graphs IPS section 1.1 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company (authored by Brigitte Baldi, University of California-Irvine; adapted by Jim Brumbaugh-Smith, Manchester College) Objectives Displaying distributions with graphs Recognize numerical vs. categorical data Construct graphs representing a distribution of numerical data Histograms Stemplots Describe overall patterns in numerical data Identify exceptions to overall patterns Discuss pros and cons of histograms vs. stemplots Terminology Individual (or “observation”) Variable numerical (or “quantitative”) categorical (or “qualitative) Value Frequency absolute relative Frequency table Distribution Terminology (cont’d) Graphs for quantitative data Histogram Stemplot (or “stem-and-leaf diagram”) Boxplot (section 1.2) Symmetric Skewed right (or “positively skewed”) Skewed left (or “negatively skewed”) Peak (or “mode”) Unimodal vs. Bimodal Outlier Variables In a study, we collect data from individuals, more formally known as observations. Observations can be people, animals, plants, or any object or process of interest. A variable is a characteristic that varies among individuals in a population or in a sample (a subset of a population). Example: age, height, blood pressure, ethnicity, leaf length, first language The distribution of a variable tells us what values the variable takes and how often it takes on these values. A distribution can also be thought of as the pattern of variation seen in the data. Two types of variables Variables can be either numerical (a/k/a quantitative) … Something that can be counted or measured for each individual and then added, subtracted, averaged, etc. across individuals in the population. Example: How tall you are, your age, your blood cholesterol level, the number of credit cards you own … or categorical (a/k/a qualitative). Something that falls into one of several categories. What can be computed is the count or proportion of individuals in each category. Example: Your blood type (A, B, AB, O), your hair color, your ethnicity, whether you paid income tax last tax year or not How do you know if a variable is categorical or quantitative? Ask: What are the individuals in the sample? What is being recorded about those individuals? Is that a number (“quantitative”) or a statement (“categorical”)? Categorical Quantitative Each individual is assigned to one of several categories. Each individual is attributed a numerical value. Individuals in sample DIAGNOSIS AGE AT DEATH Patient A Heart disease 56 Patient B Stroke 70 Patient C Stroke 75 Patient D Lung cancer 60 Patient E Heart disease 80 Patient F Accident 73 Patient G Diabetes 69 Ways to chart categorical data Because the variable is categorical, the data in the graph can be ordered any way we want (alphabetical, by increasing value, by year, by personal preference, etc.) Bar graphs Each category is represented by a bar. Pie charts Peculiarity: The slices must represent the parts of one whole. Example: Top 10 causes of death in the United States 2001 Rank Causes of death Counts % of top 10s % of total deaths 1 Heart disease 700,142 37% 29% 2 Cancer 553,768 29% 23% 3 Cerebrovascular 163,538 9% 7% 4 Chronic respiratory 123,013 6% 5% 5 Accidents 101,537 5% 4% 6 Diabetes mellitus 71,372 4% 3% 7 Flu and pneumonia 62,034 3% 3% 8 Alzheimer’s disease 53,852 3% 2% 9 Kidney disorders 39,480 2% 2% 32,238 2% 1% 10 Septicemia All other causes 629,967 26% For each individual who died in the United States in 2001, we record what was the cause of death. The table above is a summary of that information. Bar graphs Top 10 causes of deaths in the United States 2001 The number of individuals who died of an accident in 2001 is approximately 100,000. Ca nc Ce er re s br ov Ch as cu ro ni la c r re sp ira to ry Ac ci Di de ab nt s et es m el Fl litu u & s pn eu Al zh m on ei m ia er 's di se Ki as dn e ey di so rd er s Se pt ice m ia ise as es 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 He ar td Counts (x1000) Each category is represented by one bar. The bar’s height shows the count (or sometimes the percentage) for that particular category. zh ei m er 's di de nt s se as e Ac ci 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Ca nc Ce er s re br ov Ch as cu ro la ni r c re sp ira Di to ab ry et es m el Fl litu u s & pn eu m on He ia ar td ise as Ki dn es ey di so rd er s Se pt ice m ia Al Counts (x1000) ise as es Ca nc Ce er re s br ov Ch as cu ro ni la c r re sp ira to ry Ac ci Di de ab nt s et es m el Fl litu u & s pn eu Al zh m on ei m ia er 's di se Ki as dn e ey di so rd er s Se pt ice m ia He ar td Counts (x1000) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Top 10 causes of deaths in the United States 2001 Bar graph sorted by rank Easy to analyze Sorted alphabetically Much less useful Pie charts Each slice represents a piece of one whole. The size of a slice depends on what percent of the whole this category represents. Percent of people dying from top 10 causes of death in the United States in 2000 Make sure your labels match the data. Make sure all percents add up to 100. Percent of deaths from top 10 causes Percent of deaths from all causes Child poverty before and after government intervention—UNICEF, 1996 What does this chart tell you? •The United States has the highest rate of child poverty among developed nations (22% of under 18). •Its government does the least—through taxes and subsidies—to remedy the problem (size of orange bars and percent difference between orange/blue bars). Could you transform this bar graph to fit in 1 pie chart? In two pie charts? Why? The poverty line is defined as 50% of national median income. Histograms Vertical bar chart where horizontal axis is a numerical scale corresponding to the data. Vertical axis represents frequency (how many) or relative frequency (what proportion) “Peaks” correspond to commonly occurring data values. “Valleys” and “tails” correspond to values which do not occur as frequently. Most states have between 0 and 10 percent Hispanic residents A very small number have between 25 and 45 percent. Histograms The range of values that a variable can take is divided into equal size intervals. The histogram shows the number (i.e., frequency) of individual data points that fall in each interval. The first column represents all states with a percent Hispanic in their population between 0% and 4.99%. The height of the column shows how many states (27) have the percent Hispanic residents in this range. The last column represents all states with a percent Hispanic between 40% and 44.99%. There is only one such state: New Mexico, at 42.1% Hispanics. Creating a histogram What “class size” should you use? Use an appropriate number of classes − usually between 5 and 15 work well, depending on number of data values being represented. Either too few or too many classes will obscure the pattern in the data. Not so detailed that it is no longer summary Avoid using many classes having frequency of only 0 or 1 Not overly summarized so that you lose all the information rule of thumb: start with 5 to 10 classes Look at the distribution and refine your classes. (There isn’t a unique or “perfect” histogram.) Guidelines for histograms Label the horizontal axis with a consistent numerical scale. (Don’t leave any gaps in the scale or compress the scale toward the left or right side of the graph) Use vertical bars of equal width. Label the horizontal scale on the class boundaries. An exception is when each bar corresponds to a single whole number. Then it is reasonable to label each bar at its midpoint. Same data set Not summarized enough Too summarized Interpreting histograms When describing the distribution of a quantitative variable, we look for the overall pattern and for striking deviations from that pattern. We can describe the overall pattern of a histogram by its shape, center, and spread. Histogram with a line connecting each column too detailed Histogram with a smoothed curve highlighting the overall pattern of the distribution Most common distribution shapes Symmetric distribution A distribution is symmetric if the right and left sides of the histogram are approximately mirror images of each other. A distribution is skewed to the right if the right side of the histogram (side with larger values) extends much farther out than the left side. It is skewed to the left if the left side of the extends much farther out than the right. Skewed right distribution Complex, multimodal distribution Not all distributions have a simple overall shape, especially when there are few observations. Histogram of Drydays in 1995 IMPORTANT NOTE: Your data are the way they are. Do not try to force them into a particular shape. It is a common misconception that if you have a large enough data set, the data will eventually turn out nice and symmetrical. Outliers An important kind of deviation is an outlier. Outliers are observations that lie outside the overall pattern of a distribution. Always look for outliers and try to explain them. The overall pattern is fairly symmetrical except for two states clearly not belonging to the main trend. Alaska and Florida have unusual representation of the elderly in their population. A large gap in the distribution is typically a sign of an outlier. Alaska Florida More on Outliers If outlier is incorrect data (e.g., data entry error, false response) Correct it if possible. Discard if absolutely sure it is wrong. Discarding data might introduce a bias if uncorrectable errors tend to be mainly high (or mainly low) values. If outlier is correct data consider effect on analysis Which statistical technique is most appropriate? How are conclusions affected by the outlier? Some Other Strategies: Refine population definition if unusual responses are not part of intended study group. If sample size is quite small collect more data to see if any gaps fill in. Stemplots (or “stem-and-leaf ” diagrams) How to make a stemplot: 1) Truncate (or “trim”) the data to appropriate level of accuracy. 2) Separate each observation into a stem, consisting of all but the final (rightmost) digit, and a leaf, which is the remaining final digit. Stems may have as many digits as needed, but each leaf contains a single digit. 3) Write the stems in a column with the smallest value at the top, and draw a vertical line at the right of this column. 4) Write each leaf in the row to the right of its stem, in increasing order out from the stem. Leaves should be aligned in vertical columns. (Why?) STEM LEAVES State Percent Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada NewHampshire NewJersey NewMexico NewYork NorthCarolina NorthDakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania RhodeIsland SouthCarolina SouthDakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia W ashington W estVirginia W isconsin W yoming 1.5 4.1 25.3 2.8 32.4 17.1 9.4 4.8 16.8 5.3 7.2 7.9 10.7 3.5 2.8 7 1.5 2.4 0.7 4.3 6.8 3.3 2.9 1.3 2.1 2 5.5 19.7 1.7 13.3 42.1 15.1 4.7 1.2 1.9 5.2 8 3.2 8.7 2.4 1.4 2 32 9 0.9 4.7 7.2 0.7 3.6 6.4 Step 1: Sort the data State Percent Maine W estVirginia Vermont NorthDakota Mississippi SouthDakota Alabama Kentucky NewHampshire Ohio Montana Tennessee Missouri Louisiana SouthCarolina Arkansas Iowa Minnesota Pennsylvania Michigan Indiana W isconsin Alaska Maryland NorthCarolina Virginia Delaware Oklahoma Georgia Nebraska W yoming Massachusetts Kansas Hawaii W ashington Idaho Oregon RhodeIsland Utah Connecticut Illinois NewJersey NewYork Florida Colorado Nevada Arizona Texas California NewMexico 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.9 2 2 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.6 4.1 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.8 5.2 5.3 5.5 6.4 6.8 7 7.2 7.2 7.9 8 8.7 9 9.4 10.7 13.3 15.1 16.8 17.1 19.7 25.3 32 32.4 42.1 Percent of Hispanic residents in each of the 50 states Step 2: Assign the values to stems and leaves Stemplots versus histograms Stemplots are quick and dirty histograms that can easily be done by hand, therefore very convenient for back of the envelope calculations. However, they are rarely found in scientific publications. Stemplots versus histograms 1) Advantages of Stemplots Quick to do by hand (no frequency table needed) Maintains all the numerical data Good for comparing two distributions (using back-to-back plots) 2) Disadvantages Not as crisp visually (compared to a graphics-quality histogram) Most people like numerical scale on horizontal axis. Variations on stemplots 1) Stem-splitting Use to increase the number of stems Create one stem for leaves 0-4 Second stem for leaves 5-9 2) Back-to-back Stemplots Use to compare two data sets measured on same scale (e.g., male vs. female heights). Use single stem with leaves on opposite sides for different data sets. Ways to chart quantitative data Line graphs: time plots Use when there is a meaningful sequence, like time. The line connecting the points helps emphasize any change over time. Histograms and stemplots These are summary graphs for a single variable. They are very useful to understand the pattern of variability in the data. Other graphs to reflect numerical summaries (see Chapter 1.2) Line graphs: time plots In a time plot, time always goes on the horizontal, x axis. We describe time series by looking for an overall pattern and for striking deviations from that pattern. In a time series: A trend is a rise or fall that persist over time, despite small irregularities. A pattern that repeats itself at regular intervals of time is called seasonal variation. Retail price of fresh oranges over time Time is on the horizontal, x axis. The variable of interest—here “retail price of fresh oranges”— goes on the vertical, y axis. This time plot shows a regular pattern of yearly variations. These are seasonal variations in fresh orange pricing most likely due to similar seasonal variations in the production of fresh oranges. There is also an overall upward trend in pricing over time. It could simply be reflecting inflation trends or a more fundamental change in this industry. A time plot can be used to compare two or more data sets covering the same time period. 1918 influenza epidemic # Cases # Deaths Date 800 800 700 10000 9000 10000 8000 9000 7000 8000 6000 7000 5000 6000 4000 5000 3000 4000 2000 3000 2000 1000 1000 0 700 600 600 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 0 0 # deaths reported 1918 influenza epidemic we ewk ee1 we k 1 ewk ee3 we k 3 ewk ee5 we k 5 ewk e7 we ek ewk 7 we ee9k ewk 9 e1 we ek1 1 ewk 1 e1 we ek3 ewk 13 e1 we ek5 ewk 15 ee17 k 17 0 0 130 552 738 414 198 90 56 50 71 137 178 194 290 310 149 Incidence 36 531 4233 8682 7164 2229 600 164 57 722 1517 1828 1539 2416 3148 3465 1440 # cases diagnosed week 1 week 2 week 3 week 4 week 5 week 6 week 7 week 8 week 9 week 10 week 11 week 12 week 13 week 14 week 15 week 16 week 17 1918 influenza epidemic # Cases # Cases # Deaths # Deaths The pattern over time for the number of flu diagnoses closely resembles that for the number of deaths from the flu, indicating that about 8% to 10% of the people diagnosed that year died shortly afterward from complications of the flu. Scales matter Death rates from cancer (US, 1945-95) Death rates from cancer (US, 1945-95) Death rate (per thousand) 250 200 150 100 250 Death rate (per thousand) How you stretch the axes and choose your scales can give a different impression. 200 150 100 50 50 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 0 1940 2000 1960 1980 2000 Years Years Death rates from cancer (US, 1945-95) 250 Death rates from cancer (US, 1945-95) 220 Death rate (per thousand) Death rate (per thousand) 200 150 100 50 0 1940 1960 Years 1980 2000 A picture is worth a thousand words, 200 BUT 180 160 There is nothing like hard numbers. Look at the scales. 140 120 1940 1960 1980 Years 2000 Why does it matter? What's wrong with these graphs? Cornell’s tuition over time Careful reading reveals that: 1. The ranking graph covers an 11-year period, the tuition graph 35 years, yet they are shown comparatively on the cover and without a horizontal time scale. 2. Ranking and tuition have very different units, yet both graphs are placed on the same page without a vertical axis to show the units. Cornell’s ranking over time 3. The impression of a recent sharp “drop” in the ranking graph actually shows that Cornell’s rank has IMPROVED from 15th to 6th ...