Changes in Agriculture: How can AgrAbility Keep Pace Brad Rein, PE Director Processing, Engineering and Technology USDA Cooperative State Research Education and Extension Service Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Presentation Outline • • • • The Bio-energy Economy Animal Agriculture Specialty Crops Farm Structure, Finance & Technology • Implications for AgrAbility Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov The Up and Down Support For Biomass Carter Reagan Bush 41 Clinton Bush 43 120 100 Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act & Energy Loan Tax Act Guarantees For Alcohol Plants Funding (Million $) 80 60 40 Deficit Reduction Act Intermodal Surface Transportation Act Tax Reform Act Clean Air Act Amend.& Pollution Gramm Rudman Prevention Act Hollings Act Transportation Equity Act For the 21st Century Energy Security Act & Crude Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act 20 Energy Conservation Reauthorization Act Biomass R&D Act Energy Policy Act EPACT Renewable Energy Production Incentive (REPI) Farm American Jobs Bill Creation Act of 2004 Tax Relief Extension Act 0 77 81 85 89 93 97 01 Fiscal Year Alcohol Fuels R&D & Market Development Biobased Products - Included Forest Products and Agriculture (Interior) Biomass, Biofuels, Biopower, Energy from Municipal Waste - EMW (Interior- &Included EWD) Biobased Products Forest Products and Agriculture Bioenergy (EWD) (Interior) Energy f rom Municipal Waste - EMW (Interior and EWD) Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov 05 Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov U.S. Dependence on Foreign Oil Updated July 2005. Source: International Energy Annual 2003 (EIA), Tables 1.2 and 8.1-O&GJ. Canada’s reserves include tar sands. Oil Reserves Saudi Arabia Canada Iran Iraq Kuwait U.A.E. Venezuela Russia Libya 3% Nigeria 2% U.S. 2% 21% 14% 10% 9% 8% 8% 6% 5% Rate of Use U.S. Japan China Germany Russia India Canada Brazil S. Korea France Mexico 0% 25% 7% 7% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% The United States uses more oil than the next five highest-consuming nations combined. 5% 10% 15% 20% Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov 25% • President George W. Bush – 2006 State of the Union Address Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy. And here we have a serious problem: • "America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world." • "The best way to break this addiction is through technology.” • …. and we are on the threshold of Capitol, incredible advances… Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2006 • “…. replace more than 75 percent of White House photo by Eric Draper our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025.” “By applying the talent and technology of America, this country can dramatically improve our environment, move beyond a petroleum-based economy, and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past.” Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov MUCH INTEREST - - - - MANY GOALS HAVE WE ONLY JUST BEGUN? Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov USDA-REE Energy Science and Education Programs - ERS USDA projections of corn use for ethanol have risen dramatically Billion bushels 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 RFS - Renewable Fuels Program, Energy Policy Act of 2005 RFS + Oil Prices 2007 RFS 2006 2.5 2.0 1.5 Pre-RFS 2005 1.0 0.5 0.0 2000/01 2005/06 2010/11 Crop year Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov 2015/16 ENERGY AND AGRICULTURE The U.S. ethanol sector is adding over 6 billion gallons to its capacity Changes in distribution and transportation of raw materials and products Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Future Directions ? Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Future Directions ? How will new crop production systems impact accommodating disability in agriculture? Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov ENERGY AND AGRICULTURE In 2004 “no till” farming reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 10mil tons = to 20% of cars Source: Monsanto Pesticides 6% LP Gas 5% Natural Gas 4% Does reduction in fuel equate with reduction of exposure to farm equipment injuries? Fertilizers 28% Gasoline 9% Source: Miranowski, John, “Energy Consumption in U.S. Agriculture,” Proceedings – Agriculture as a Producer and Consumer of Energy Conference, Arlington, VA, June 24-25, 2004. Sponsored by Farm Foundation. Electricity 21% Diesel 27% Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Animal Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Source: USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum, March 2007 Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Demand for animal protein depends primarily on income and population growth Projected Growth in Meat Consumption (mt) 2004-2014 Source: OECD-FAO Millions of tons 14 12 10 8 Series1 6 4 2 0 Canada Brazil China Russia Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Future of US Animal Agriculture • Growth – $99Billion Ag. sector increasing $1Billion/yr • Scale – Increasing in size & concentration – Advantage in needs of processors • Location – Processors (urban to rural) close to producers • 85% beef, pork, chicken 400+ employees Source: The Future of Animal Agriculture in North America: A Farm Foundation Project Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Future of US Animal Agriculture Challenges and Issues • Consumer Demand – Food safety, quality, animal welfare • Global Competitiveness and Trade – Perceived vs real risks • Environmental Issues – Byproducts, air & water quality • Community and Labor Issues – More dangerous lower pay than manufacturing – Rely on immigrant labor Source: The Future of Animal Agriculture in North America: A Farm Foundation Project Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Co-location of Animal Agriculture and Bio-fuels Industries • Integrated system – Energy from methane cogeneration – Dried distillers grains for feed • Adds to rural infrastructure – Not just the mid-west Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Specialty Crops The U.S. specialty crop industry is comprised of producers and handlers of fruits, tree nuts, vegetables, melons, potatoes and nursery crops, including floriculture. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov . Specialty crop production as a percentage of total agricultural production by county. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Specialty Crops • 2.9% of harvested cropland • 40% of value of all harvested cropland • $50B in 2004 • Highest labor cost (40-60%) • Intense global competition • Homeland Security/Immigration reform Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Specialty Crop Research Initiative • Proposed by USDA Secretary in 2007 Farm Bill – Improve crop characteristics – Identify invasive species – Optimize production efficiency – Develop new mechanization technologies Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Farm Structure, Finance & Technology Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Source: USDA-OCE 2007 Agricultural Outlook Forum, March 2007 Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Source: USDA-OCE Agricultural Outlook Forum, March 2007 Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov America’s Diverse Family Farms • Small family farms (<$250,000) – – – – – Limited Resource Retirement Residential/Lifestyle Farming-occupation/low sales (< $100k) Farming-occupation/high sales (> $100k) • Large- family (<$500k) • Very large family (>$500k) • Non-family farm Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov ERS Family Farm Report 2007 • Large, very large and non-family account for 75% of production • 90% of farms are small family farms and account for 61% of land owned by farmers • Small farms have 82% of the land enrolled in CRP and WRP Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov ERS Family Farm Report 2007 • Most rapid growth is farms with sales of $1mil. or more accounting for 48% of sales in 2002 compared to 23% of sales in 1982 • Small farm households rely on off farm income • Few small farms use production and marketing contracts while 64% of very large family farms use contracts and as a group produce 61% of production grown under contract Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Farm households with higher off-farm income are more likely to adopt farm technologies that economize on management time than those that are time intensive. Adoption of time-saving technologies, such as herbicide-tolerant (HT) soybeans, is associated with higher offfarm incomes Source: USDA Economic Research Service, Off Farm Income, Technology Adoption, and Farm Economic Performance, Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo Adoption of time-intensive technologies such as integrated pest management is more closely associated with lower offfarm incomes Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Technology • Ergonomics – UC-Davis Agricultural Ergonomics Research Center • Autonomous vehicles – Carnegie-Mellon Robotics Institute Autonomous Mower-Conditioner Carnegie-Mellon Robotics Institute Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Implications for AgrAbility Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov AgrAbility VISION Enhance the quality of life for people with disabilities in agriculture in a rapidly changing agricultural economy Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Working together to create a stronger organization Cognizant of roles and responsibilities of partnership Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Role/Responsibilities of the National Project • Provide limited, on-demand type services in areas without a state project • Produce and/or recommend educational materials, networking strategies, assistance protocols, and marketing products for state project adoption and use • Moderate information-sharing forums • Identify, promote, and address opportunities and challenges for AgrAbility • Evaluate the program’s impacts annually---this is where demographic and other data collection falls into place. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Role/Responsibilities of the State Projects • • • • • • Operate within a defined geographic area Complete project objectives under three overarching priority areas Partner with a non-profit disability organization Participate in National Project-initiated efforts to collect activity data Submit annual and final reports to CSREES Effectively serve the qualifying population Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Role/Responsibilities of CSREES • • • • Provide program oversight to the National Project and the State Projects Ensure that federal dollars are spent and managed appropriately Ensure fair and objective review of proposals Communicate program successes and impacts to USDA and Congress via program and OMB portfolio reviews Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov Summary & Recommendations • Current and future trends in agricultural production systems can have either positive or negative impacts on people with disabilities in agricultural. – New jobs? New hazards? •Be at the table in identifying priority research, education and accommodation needs • Identify opportunities for resource sharing • Acknowledge challenges and prioritize resources Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service http://www.csrees.usda.gov