* QEP Progress Report 1st quarter 2013 - 2014

advertisement

W rite H ere! W rite N ow!

Quality Enhancement Plan Update

Virginia Union University

February 7, 2014

3 rd Year Review

2013-2014

The Promise of a Limitless Future

©

“Students Are Central to Success” – S ACS COC

Eve Davis, Ph.D., Director, QEP 1

QEP Organization Chart

Effective August 1, 2013-December 2014 (strategy implemented until all courses are completed)

VP for

Academic Affairs

QEP Director

University Advisement

Committee and WI designated

Instructors and V/P for institutional Effectiveness

Workshop Coordinator/QEP

Director For QEP Electronic

Portfolio training/Faculty

Development Workshop

Administrative

Assistant /

QEP Data

Entry Clerk

QEP workshop for (WI) components Workshop #1 session for Electronic Portfolio training: Instructors only

Workshop #1

QEP workshop with WI instructors and students Electronic

Portfolio

Workshop # 2

QEP workshop with WI instructors and students

Electronic Portfolio

Workshop #3

2

QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES

CR 2.12: The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that includes an institutional process for identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment and focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution. (Quality Enhancement Plan)

INDICATOR OUTCOMES/ASSESSMENTS

1.A.

An institutional process

1.B.

Key issues identified that emerge from institutional assessment

2.A.

Focus on learning outcomes and accomplishing the mission of the institution

2.B.

Focus on the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution

Plan is directly related to institutional planning efforts. Topic selection involved process that generated information and specific ideas from a wide range of constituents. Selection of topic determined by representative process that considered institutional needs and viability of plan.

A direct and strong relationship of QEP topic to institutional needs; clear how accomplishments of QEP would directly improve institutional/student performance.

Detailed student learning outcomes tied directly to institutional needs.

A clear relationship between activities of QEP and the improvement of student learning, all tied to establish institutional needs.

3

QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES – cont’d

CS 3.3.2: The institution has developed a Quality Enhancement Plan that (1) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP; (2) includes broad-based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP; and (3) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement.

INDICATOR

3.A.

Capability to initiate the plan.

3.B. Capability to implement and complete the plan.

OUTCOMES/ASSESSMENTS

Very detailed budget information, institutional commitment of funds clearly indicated. If individuals are not yet identified, detail job descriptions provided that indicate the specific skills and abilities needed for key personnel. Organizational structure shows clear reporting responsibilities and oversight structures.

Very detailed timetable is provided for year-by-year activities including specific actions, budgetary expenditures and assessment processes. Timetable indicates clearly that QEP can be realistically implemented and completed in five years.

Process used ensured input from all relevant constituencies in developing the plan.

4.A. Broad-based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development of the plan.

4.B.

Broad-based involvement of institutional constituencies in the proposed implementation of plan.

All relevant constituencies have direct involvement in implementation.

4

QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES – cont’d

CS 3.3.2: The institution has developed a Quality Enhancement Plan that (1) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP; (2) includes broad-based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP; and (3) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement.

INDICATOR

5.A.

Identified goals for the Quality

Enhancement Plan

OUTCOMES/ASSESSMENTS

Goals are clearly stated, and lead to specific, measurable outcomes.

5.B. A plan to assess the achievement of the goals of the

Quality Enhancement Plan

Assessment is based on clear outcomes, assessment methods related to outcomes, and are direct measures of those outcomes.

Overall Evaluation of Acceptability of the Quality Enhancement Plan

All components of the plan are acceptable or exceptional;

No weaknesses.

5

QEP BUDGET AND SUSTAINABILITY

The Board of Trustees and the administration of the university have made the QEP efforts priority because of the desire to see VUU’s students succeed academically. In addition, the 10% return from the College Composition I & II and Freshman

Communication Skills, textbooks will also help increase yearly budget allotments. With the continued support of our administrators as well as other stakeholders, VUU is confident that its efforts will be carried out efficiently. The following chart shows the budget allocated by the President for the writing program.

6

PRESIDENT’S ALLOCATED BUDGET FOR QEP INITIATIVES

1.

Coordinator:

Writing

Across the

Curriculum

Program

2. Writing

Center

Monitor

Year 1

$55,000

Base Salary plus

$11,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$66,000

Year 2

$55,000

Base Salary plus

$11,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$66,000

Year 3

$55,000

Base Salary plus

$11,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$66,000

Year 4

$55,000

Base Salary plus

$11,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$66,000

Year 5

$55,000

Base Salary plus

$11,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$66,000

$35,000

Base Salary plus $7,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$42,000

$35,000

Base Salary plus $7,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$42,000

$35,000

Base Salary plus $7,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$42,000

$35,000

Base Salary plus $7,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$42,000

$35,000

Base Salary plus $7,000

Fringe

Benefits =

$42,000

TOTAL

$330,000

$210,000

3. Tutors

4. E-Portfolio

$11,675

$0

$12,675

$4,000

$13,675

$9,000

$14,675

$9,000

$15,675

$9,000

$68,375

$31,000

7

PRESIDENT’S ALLOCATED BUDGET FOR QEP INITIATIVES– cont’d

5. Instant

Messaging

System

6. Training

Costs for

Faculty/

Off-Site

Conference

Attendance by WAC

Personnel

7. Assessments

8. Supplies

& Misc.

TOTAL

Year 1

$800

$9,450

$13,675

$3,200

$146,800

Year 2

$0

$9,450

$13,675

$4,000

$151,800

Year 3

$0

$9,450

$13,675

$4,000

$157,800

Year 4

$0

$9,450

$13,675

$4,000

$158,800

Year 5

$0

$9,450

$13,675

$4,000

$159,800

TOTAL

$800

$47,250

$68,375

$19,200

$775,000

*A breakdown of the Budget appears on next slide.

8

QEP BUDGET BREAKDOWN

1) WAC Coordinator -- $55,000 of base salary plus 20% in fringe benefits

($11,000) (social security taxes, pension plan, health insurance, etc.)

Total = $333,000

2) Writing Center Monitor -- $35,000 of base salary plus 20% in fringe benefits ($7,000) (social security taxes, pension plan, health insurance, etc.)

Total = $210,000

3) Tutors – Pay per hour of tutoring = $10 with some increase each year

$11,675/$10 per hour = 1,167.50 hours available for tutoring YEAR 1

Total = $68,375

4) E-Portfolio (Live Text) -- $80 per student which will begin YEAR 3. The university will pay $20. Freshmen will pay a one-time technology fee of $60. E-Portfolio will begin YEAR 3 for 450 students (450 x $20 =

$9,000) but will be piloted YEAR 2 on 200 students (200 x $20 =

$4,000)

Total = $31,000

9

QEP BUDGET BREAKDOWN—cont’d

5) Instant Messaging System (Para Chat) -- $600 for initial installment; $200 for maintenance contract

Total = $800 (one-time payment for first year)

6) Training/Faculty Development Costs –

Cost for each one full day workshop:

$1,500 stipend to instructor of session

$300 for travel expenses

$90 for lodging

Total = $1,890 per workshop

Year 1 to 5 = $1,890 x 5 workshops = $9,450

$9,450 x 5 years = $47,250

Total = $47,250

10

QEP BUDGET BREAKDOWN—cont’d

6) Assessments

COMPASS -- $3.45 per person x 500 = $1,725

Criterion -- $14.50 person x 400 = $5,800

CAAP Assessment -- $20.50 per person x 300 = $6,150

Total = $13,675 per year for five years

Grand Total = $68,375

7) Miscellaneous Supplies for VUU Writing Center and the implementation of Virginia Union University’s QEP

$3,200 for YEAR 1

$4,000 (Years 2-5) x 4 years = $16,000

$16,000 + $3,200 = $19,200

Total = $19,200

11

OCTOBER-DECEMBER 2013

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

*RELOCATION AND EXPANSION OF UNIVERSITY WRITING

CENTER:

*VUU WRITING CENTER LOCATED IN ELLISON 206

(RE-OPENED JANUARY 16, 2014)

*WRITING CENTER HOURS EXPANDED: 9 AM-5 PM, M-W-F &

9 AM-6 PM, T-TH

*WRITING INTENSIVE WORKSHOPS (FOR SCIENCES & HISTORY

COURSES) FOR SPRING 2014

* STUDENTS SERVED: 142 STUDENTS SERVED

(NOVEMBER 18-DECEMBER 13, 2013)

12

November 2013:

Blue: 9 students

Red: 54 students

Green:

13 students

December 2013:

Blue: 61 students

Red: 5 students

VUU Writing Center

Roswitha M. Shelton, Coordinator

Number of Students Tutored

Nov. 18-Dec. 13, 2013

Column 1: November 2013

Subtotal: 76 Students

Column 2: December 2013

Subtotal: 66 Students

TOTAL: 142 Students

13

OBJECTIVE : YEAR 3

*IMPLEMENTATION OF WRITING INTENSIVE

WORKSHOPS/ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOS

(COMPLETED DECEMBER 2013)

*THREE SCIENCE PROFESSORS IDENTIFIED AND TRAINED TO

IMPLEMENT SCIENCE (WI) WRITING INTENSIVE COURSES

*TWO HISTORY TEACHERS IDENTIFIED AND TRAINED TO

IMPLEMENT HISTORY (WI) WRITING INTENSIVE COURSES

(EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2014)

14

OBJECTIVE YEAR 3 – CONTINUES

* LIVETEXT CONTACTED, DECEMBER, 2013, AND WILL BE THE

REPOSITORY OF THE E- PORTFOLIOS SUBMITTED BY SCIENCE

AND HISTORY STUDENTS

*

LIVETEXT IS THE ACADEMIC ELECTRONIC SOFTWARE

USED TO IMPORT THE ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOS

15

QEP at Work

Spring 2014 -- Year 3

Science 150

•Learning to write in various genres

(WI)

•25 students

Science 151

•Learning to write in various genres

(WI)

•25 students

Science 152

•Learning to write in various genres

(WI)

•25 students

History 145

•Learning to write in various genres

(WI)

•25 students

History 146

•Learning to write in various genres

(WI)

•25 students

QEP Assessment/Evaluation

June-August 2014

16

TITLE III OBJECTIVE IN MEASURABLE TERMS

TO MEET TITLE III OBJECTIVE OF 65 % OF FACULTY

TEACHING WRITING INTENSIVE CLASSES, FACULTY

DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOPS ARE BEING SCHEDULED

MARCH, APRIL, AND MAY, SPRING 2014.

17

SUBSEQUENT QEP GOALS

*AFTER THE 5 TH YEAR, AT LEAST 90% OF THE

COURSES TAUGHT WILL BE WRITING INTENSIVE

(WI)

*OCTOBER 2014, ADVISORY COMMITTEE WILL

CONVENE TO DISCUSS NEW QEP FOCUS FOR

NEXT 5 YEARS.

18

INITIAL ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

(JUNE – AUGUST 2014)

19

20

Download