NTTG 0rder 1000 Stakeholder Meeting March 28, 2012 Radisson Hotel Portland, Oregon 1 Agenda 2 10:00 am – 10:15 am Welcome and Introductions 10:15 am – 10:30 am O1K Planning Compliance Workgroup Status Update 10:30 am – 11:10 am Draft Tariff Revisions 11:10 am – 11: 30 am Draft Planning Committee Charter Revisions 11:30 am – 12:00 pm Draft Planning Practices Document 12:00 pm – 12:45 pm Lunch Break 12:45 pm – 1:30 pm Continue Draft Planning Practices Review 1:30 pm – 2:00 pm Cost Allocation Workgroup Status Update 2:00 pm Next Steps and Adjourn Draft Tariff Revisions Order 1000 Stakeholder Update March 28, 2012 Radisson Hotel Portland, Oregon 3 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Draft Tariff Revision materials are posted to the NTTG Website To access the Draft Tariff Revision materials click on the following: • Redline – Click Here • Clean – Click Here 4 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Committee Charter Order 1000 Stakeholder Update March 28, 2012 Radisson Hotel Portland, Oregon 5 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Overview of Proposed Changes (NTTG Planning Committee Charter) General Changes: a. b. c. Deleted paragraph on “Authority of Planning committee” and “Project facilitation” – too obvious Moved the Principles and Footprint/Coordination to an Appendix Deleted “Biennial Transmission Planning Cycle”, “Footprint/Coordination” and “Confidentiality of Data”– already in Attachment K document Partitioned the document into nine major sections as follows: I. Purpose – edited extensively II. Duties and Responsibilities – new section III. Committee Operating Structure IV. Committee Chair V. Committee Meetings VI. Decision Making VII.Technical Work Group - new VIII.Budget IX. Change Control PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE 6 I. Purpose • The purpose of the NTTG Planning Committee is to: 1. Provide a forum where all stakeholders are encouraged to participate in the planning, coordination, and development of a more efficient and more cost effective Regional Transmission Plan. 2. Prepare a Regional Transmission Plan consistent with applicable NERC and WECC system reliability standards and criteria, and public policy needs. 3. Ensure the Regional Transmission Plan satisfies FERC Order 890 and 1000 compliance requirements.. • The broad stakeholder participation envisioned in this process (including transmission owners, customers and state regulators) is intended to result in a Regional Transmission Plan that meet a variety of needs and has a broad basis of support. PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE II. Duties and Responsibilities of the Planning Committee • The NTTG Planning Committee reports to the NTTG Steering Committee and is responsible for: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Developing the study plan for each biennial cycle, Obtaining NTTG Steering Committee approval of the study plan, Performing and documenting the assessments as defined in the study plan, Conduct stakeholder economic studies requests for the NTTG, Coordinating transmission planning with adjacent regional planning groups, Coordinating planning with the WECC planning committees, and Publishing, on a biennial basis a Steering Committee approved regional Transmission Expansion Plan. PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE No changes applied to: III. Committee Operating Structure IV. Committee Chair V. Committee Meetings VI. Decision Making PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE V. Technical Work Group – “New” • The NTTG Planning Committee will form and over see a Technical Work Group (TWG) having the proper technical skills, experience, tools and resources to perform the detailed analysis and studies required to support the biennial study cycle and the plan development overall. The TWG will be responsible for performing the bulk of the technical studies and analysis required by the most recent approved biennial regional transmission study plan. The Planning Committee will select individuals from the Planning Committee members based on transmission planning experience, access to and ability to use power system analysis and/or production cost simulation software, power system modeling expertise, and overall knowledge of the NTTG transmission footprint and the western interconnection. PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE No Change VIII. Budget PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE IX. Change Control Procedures • Changes to the Planning Committee structure, functions and responsibilities including its Charter will be conducted through open stakeholder processes currently in use by NTTG and any changes will subsequently be approved by the NTTG Steering Committee. PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE QUESTIONS ? PROCESS AID FOR DISUCSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE 13 Regional Planning Practice Order 1000 Stakeholder Update March 28, 2012 Radisson Hotel Portland, Oregon 14 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Information from NTTG’s Regional Planning Practice document Index 1. Objective of NTTG’s Regional Transmission Planning Process 2. Biennial Planning Cycle 3. Information Gathering from Transmission Providers and Stakeholders 4. Regional Transmission Plan Evaluation Process 5. Study Plan 15 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Objective Regional Planning Process • Develop an initial regional transmission plan from a roll up of the local transmission plans • Improve upon that plan, if possible, • Develop a Regional Transmission Plan that meets the regional transmission needs more efficiently and cost effectively than the roll up of the transmission providers local transmission plans 16 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 3 Information from NTTG’s Regional Planning Practice document Index 1. Objective of NTTG’s Regional Transmission Planning Process 2. Biennial Planning Cycle 3. Information Gathering from Transmission Providers and Stakeholders 4. Regional Transmission Plan Evaluation Process 5. Study Plan 17 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Biennial Planning Process NTTG EIGHT-QUARTER BIENNIAL PLANNING PROCESS Biennial Planning Cycle Obtain Final Plan Approval 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Year Two 01 Year One * Develop Study Plan, Assumptions * Perform Draft Plan Analysis * Perform Draft Plan Analysis * Draft & Review Report and Gather Info * Final Plan Analysis & Cost Allocation * Prepare & Review Final Report * Gather Information Eligible Customer & Stakeholder Economic Congestion Study* 01 Receive Requests Perform Studies 02 Report and Review * 03 04 Receive Requests * 01 Perform Studies 02 Report and Review * 03 04 * Stakeholder Input While the resulting Regional Transmission Plan is not a construction plan, it will provide valuable regional insight and information for all stakeholders to consider and potentially modify their respective plans. 18 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 4 Information from NTTG’s Regional Planning Practice document Index 1. Objective of NTTG’s Regional Transmission Planning Process 2. Biennial Planning Cycle 3. Information Gathering from Transmission Providers and Stakeholders 4. Regional Transmission Plan Evaluation Process 5. Study Plan 19 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Type of Project Submitted Types of projects potentially in the regional transmission plan a) projects with potential regional impact rolled up from one or more local transmission providers’ transmission plan(s) b) merchant developer projects c) new “unsponsored” regional project identified through the regional planning process d) interregional projects e) non-transmission alternative projects f) transmission projects to satisfy existing or future public policy needs required by state or federal law or requirements 20 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 5 Project Submittal to the Regional Plan Non Incumbent/ Merchant Developer Transmission Provider Project Submittal Process Project for Regional Cost Allocation Consideration Project Not for Regional Cost Allocation Consideration Prior to Start of Biennial Cycle Submit Sponsor Qualification Data Fail Test Information against Qualification Criteria Pass Submit Qtr 1 Project Information Cure deficiency Submit Qtr 1 Additional Cost Allocation Data AND Project Information Data For Consideration in Regional Transmission Planning Process 21 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 6 Submitted in Plan for Cost Allocation Sponsor Qualification Data – Submit Prior to Biennial Cycle Begins Project Submitted for Selection in Regional Plan for Regional Cost Allocation Category Qualification Data 1 Project sponsor description 1. Name and address 2. Years in business 3. Operating environment (what is the nature of your business?) 2 Project sponsor demonstration of 1. Management’s experience in the industry technical expertise to develop, 2. Scope of sponsor’s technical expertise (in house construct, own the proposed facility expertise and/or out sourced expertise) 3. Name and location of a project of similar scale that demonstrates the sponsor’s technical expertise 3 Project sponsor financial expertise to 1. Balance sheet or annual report (if appropriate) develop, construct, own the proposed 2. Credit worthiness facility a. Rating agency reports (if applicable) b. Two most recent audited year-end financial statements plus any available quarterly financial statements for current fiscal year (if applicable) c. Material issues that could impact the credit decision including but not limited to litigation, arbitration, contingencies, or investigations (if applicable) 3. Other information supporting sponsor’s financial expertise 22 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 7-8 Continued 4 Project Sponsor ability to maintain and operate their proposed facility 5 Project summary 1. Prior operation experience 2. Prior maintenance experience 1. Summarize the proposed project 6 Investors 1. Description 2. Interest 1. An attestation form 7 Demonstration of ability and commitment to register and comply with all NERC standards 8 Other relevant or pertinent data or information 1. As appropriate 23 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 7-8 Additional Cost Allocation Data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Additional Cost Allocation Data - Submit During Quarter 1 Project Submitted for Possible Selection in Regional Transmission Plan for Cost Allocation Project sponsor name and project description (should be the same as provide on sponsor qualification data, if different provide update) Physical location Detailed Cost Estimate Cost/benefit analysis POR/POD Pertinent engineering and/or transmission studies or other reports A copy of any WECC or other regional, interregional or interconnection–wide planning entity economic and reliability determinations relative to the project Status of any siting process Proposed cost allocation (The sponsor should state how they would see the cost being allocated and after the modeling show a comparison of the two (ours/theirs)). Proposed Beneficiaries: (tells Cost Allocation committee what the sponsor thinks the cost recovery looks like). 24 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 9 Continued 11 Proposed cost recovery, if any other than NTTG regional cost allocation. 12 A risk and benefit analysis focusing on the distribution of costs, benefits and risks among the parties proposed to share in the cost allocation of the project. 13 Proposal on dealing with cost overruns 14 Discuss degree of consensus among stakeholders on all of the above 15 How each NTTG cost allocation and Order 1000 principles are applied in the analysis 16 A description of any regulatory rulings needed prior to examination of the project 17 Any NTTG Planning Committee analysis pertinent to the project and a description of how it fits into the NTTG Annual or Biennial Plan 18 Description of any proprietary or commercially sensitive information applicants believe should remain confidential during the review process 19 Other relevant or pertinent data and information. 25 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 9 Timeline for Submission of Qualification Data Projects Consideration for Regional Cost Allocation Timeline Biennial Cycle Quarter 1 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Qualification Submit Qualification Data Review Data and Issue Deficiency Notice if Necessary Time to Remedy Submit Additional Cost Allocaiton Data Submit Project Information 26 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 10 Selecting the Public Policy Needs for the Regional Transmission Plan Q1 Public Policy Data Submitted Transmission Provider Stakeholder Q2 Develop Study Plan Including Public Policy Needs Defined With Stakeholder and State Regulator Input PC Public Policy Recommendation For Inclusion in For Inclusion in Regional Transmission Scenario Analysis Plan Plans Public policy needs will be evaluated with other regional projects rather than considering public policy needs separately from other transmission needs. Q2 (June) Steering Committee Approve Study Plan 27 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 11 Information from NTTG’s Regional Planning Practice document Index 1. Objective of NTTG’s Regional Transmission Planning Process 2. Biennial Planning Cycle 3. Information Gathering from Transmission Providers and Stakeholders 4. Regional Transmission Plan Evaluation Process 5. Study Plan 28 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Biennial Plan Evaluation Process Year 1 NTTG TP Topology and L&R w/Pubic Policy ... Year 2 NTTG TP Topology and L&R w/Pubic Policy Qtr 3 Initial Regional Transmission Plan Defined as the Roll Up of TP Plans for Year 10 initial regional transmission plan Qtr 3-4 Initial Regional Trans Plan Analysis Higher Level Analysis of Initial Plan and Scenario Analysis Using Production Cost and Power Flow Models draft regional transmission plan Qtr 5 Draft Regional Transmission Plan Collect input to & comment on draft regional transmission plan Qtr 5-6 "Final" Regional Plan Development Detailed analysis of draft regional trans plan with stakeholder input and Q5 data updates draft Regional Transmission Plan report Qtr 7 Stakeholder Comment Revise report if appropriate draft Final Regional Transmission Plan report Qtr 8 Steering Committee Approval Final Regional Transmission Plan report 29 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 13 Information from NTTG’s Regional Planning Practice document Index 1. Objective of NTTG’s Regional Transmission Planning Process 2. Biennial Planning Cycle 3. Information Gathering from Transmission Providers and Stakeholders 4. Regional Transmission Plan Evaluation Process 5. Study Plan 30 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Study Plan • Developed during the second quarter • Will be developed in consultation with stakeholders • Will delineate the method of study of evaluation o of transmission and non-transmission alternatives that have been received • Will be followed as closely as possible o any change will coordinate stakeholders o scheduled Transmission Planning committee meetings 31 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 13 The Study Plan The minimum information to be in the study plan will include the following: 32 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 14 Goal of the Study • Determined to be an efficiently and cost effective • May be different than the local transmission plans. Planning Study Will… • Examine a limited number of scenarios • Identify regional transmission and non transmission improvements and/or new solutions • Include additional scenarios other public policy needs 33 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 14 Deliverables from the Plan • develop a Regional Transmission Plan • plan meets the regional transmission needs • more efficiently and • cost effectively than the initial regional transmission plan • deliverables may be further defined • during the development of the study plan • with consultation from stakeholder 34 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 14 At a minimum a more efficient Regional Transmission Plan … • when compared to the initial transmission plan • meets the needs roughly commensurate • equal to or better reliability performance • congestion will not be greater • can be developed in the proper timeframe • does not accelerate any future problems unless • total cost with mitigation no greater than initial transmission plan • there is sufficient time to mitigate the problem 35 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 14 At a minimum a more cost effective Regional Transmission Plan … • when compared to the initial transmission plan • total incremental capital cost is less than or equal to • total production cost of the is less than or equal to • or, the sum less than or equal to The study plan may modify the efficient and cost effective selection criteria after consultation with stakeholders. 36 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 15 Reevaluation of Project Selected in Regional Plan for Cost Allocation A transmission provider solution maybe displaced during NTTG’s regional biennial planning and a delay in development of a project selected in the regional plan for cost allocation occurs Transmission Provider may choose to … • have effects evaluated in the biennial process • revise their local plan back to original solution that was displaced 37 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 15 Methodology The Plan will … • biennially prepare a long-term (up to 10 year) • describe the study techniques • identify the system conditions • use a recently TEPPC study base case • discussion the contingencies to be run • meet applicable NERC and WECC system reliability standards and criteria 38 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Planning Practice Pg 16-17 QUESTIONS ? PROCESS AID FOR DISUCSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE 39 Cost Allocation Workgroup Status Update Order 1000 Stakeholder Update March 28, 2012 Radisson Hotel Portland, Oregon 40 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE NTTG Benefits Brainstorm Sessions: Part I (Portland 2/17) RTOs NTTG Members • MISO • MISO LODF • CAISO • PJM DFAX • SPP • Bottom Up “Economic Projects” • NYISO 41 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Benefits and Cost Allocation Brainstorm Part II (Boise 2/29) Outcome from Boise 2/29 discussion of top down vs. Bottom Approach to Cost Allocation • Book reports looking at how RTOs arrived at methodologies for determination of benefits and cost allocation • SPP (Highway/Byway • NYISO • MISO • Bottoms Up Approach • PJM (DFAX) • Revised work plan developed 42 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Cost Allocation Methodology Assessment Plan • NTTG must adopt a cost allocation methodology to meet the compliance requirements of Order No. 1000 • Work plan: – Analyze and prepare “book reports” on methodologies previously approved by FERC – Determine which metrics used to support these methodologies may be appropriate for NTTG’s use – Where possible, run modeling scenarios using the identified metrics to simulate cost allocation results for NTTG – Based on these analyses and stakeholder input, recommend a cost allocation methodology for approval by the NTTG Steering Committee 43 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE Current Status • Book Report Results Update • Direction Forward 44 PROCESS AID FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE