HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BUILD BRIDGE BELIEVE Campus Name: John H. Reagan High School Campus Number: 012 Principal: Connie Berger School Support Officer / Lead Principal: James McSwain Chief School Officer: Harrison Peters Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 S3/10/2015 CHO O L I M P R O V E M E NT PLAN 2014-2015 3:19 PM SIP Part 1: Background, Data Analysis and Needs Assessment MISSION STATEMENT The faculty, staff, and community of John H. Reagan High School are committed to creating lifelong learners in an atmosphere of respect and responsibility. Students are encouraged to reach their maximum potential by promoting positive attitudes in a safe, nurturing environment and by establishing high standards of excellence, character, academics, and international mindedness. SCHOOL PROFILE John H. Reagan High School provides students with a personalized learning environment through smaller learning communities comprised of career-related academies. As a part of a comprehensive high school, students are able to participate in numerous extra-curricular activities, while receiving a quality education focused on academic rigor and college/career readiness. Reagan is dedicated to the principle that students can achieve their intellectual, social, and physical potential through exposure to a quality education presented in a positive learning environment. Reagan has been serving Houston and the Historic Heights community since 1926. One of Houston’s first schools, the campus was renovated in 2006. Students now learn in an historic landmark, while preparing for the academic challenges of the 21st century. As the home for Houston Independent School District’s Magnet School for Computer Technology, Reagan also sponsors four additional career pathway academies. These are the Academy of Business, the Academy of Health Science, the Academy of Engineering, and the Academy of Transportation Technology. Each academy, along with the thee magnet tracks of Computer Programming, Audio and Visual Production, and Digital Media and Web Technology, offers a sequence of career-related course work that leads to industry related recognition and/or certification. At Reagan High School every student is expected to develop into a life-long learner. Students engage in challenging courses connected to the real world, discover unique gifts and talents, experience personal achievement, and meet high expectations for learning and personal conduct. Reagan offers a full complement of core and core support classes in English Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, Social Studies, the Arts, Physical Education, and Languages Other than English. Additionally, Reagan offers twenty-five Advanced Placement and Pre-Advanced Placement courses and is a Neighborhood Vanguard school. Reagan provides student services in English as a Second Language, Behavior Support Services, Skills for Learning and Living, Community Based Vocational Instruction, Speech Therapy Services, and Classroom Support Facilitation for students with special learning needs. In 2013 Reagan became an International Baccalaureate World School authorized for the Middle Years Programme. This designation resulted in creating the first continuous IB feeder pattern in the Houston Independent School District. Currently, Reagan is also labeled as an IB Candidate School for the Diploma Years and will submit its official application for the Diploma Years Programme in the spring of 2015. The International Baccalaureate offers challenging educational programs designed to help students develop their intellectual, personal, emotional, and social skills to live, learn, and work in a rapidly globalizing world. Achieving IB authorization is a rigorous process requiring all faculty, staff, and campus leadership to have been trained to understand and implement the program framework. The 2014-2015 academic year Reagan will also see the inauguration of two additional campus initiatives, Linked Learning and PowerUp. Part of a district pilot program, Linked Learning will help students blend the classroom work of their core classes with the real world application from their Career Technology pathway. Students will experience instruction through the lens of a potential career. PowerUp is the district’s one-to-one technology initiative to provide each student with a laptop computer. Each classroom will become a 21st Century learning hub. Throughout the fall semester teachers will receive professional development on integrating technology into instruction. Students will first receive their computers in January of 2015. Enrollment at Reagan High School has continued to grow. Recent numbers in grades nine through twelve, have been consistently over 2200. This has resulted in the campus being reclassified as 6A, according University Interscholastic League criteria. Student demographics have also experienced a slight shift over the past few years. Hispanic numbers in the student body have fallen to 83%, while African American numbers have risen to 12% and white to 5%. Approximately 77% of students are classified as Economically Disadvantaged, resulting in a campus-wide Title I designation. With a mobility rate under 10% and a falling attrition rate, Reagan is reversing the trends seen in many urban high schools. Students receiving services through Special Education remains under 10% and the number of English Language Learners has fallen to under 4%. With implementation of a credit recovery program and monitoring through a DRIP committee, graduation rates have continue to rise, currently hovering around 96% Fundamentally, a graduate from Reagan High School will be prepared to confidently pursue his/her academic, career, and life goals. Reagan’s mission is to create a college bound culture, guided by the following core values. o Student learning is derived from effective instruction and from an atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. o The school is a learning community with achievement standards that prepare students to be lifelong learners with multiple options for the future. o School has an important role in preparing students for a lifetime of active citizenship in our nation and across the globe. o As education professionals, the faculty and staff of Reagan High School serve consistently as advocates for student success. SHARED DECISION MAKING Organizational Structure The Shared Decision-Making model (SDM) is designed to establish, monitor, and evaluate campus goals for budgeting, staffing, curriculum, planning, school organization, staffing patterns, and staff development. The Regan council is aligned to state legislation and HISD board policy. Our intention is to pull together our community in a constructive, organized, and unified body to enhance the education of all students. Professional staff representatives of the SDMC are elected by the faculty. In addition, the Reagan committee has, at a minimum, one non-instructional staff member, one business member, at least two parents and at least two community members. Parents are elected by the PTO membership. The Reagan council meets monthly, or as mandated by the district, to discuss issues brought forth by the administration, staff, parents, or community. It is supported by intermittent standing committees formed to address specific concerns or issues. Standing committees meet as needed. Parents are encouraged to serve on standing committees. The SDMC functions under the direction of the Principal. Members of the SDMC attend SDMC meetings for the term of his/her office, monitor the implementation of the School Improvement Plan, address issues presented by the principal, present issues for discussion and recommend resolutions to the SDMC, create ad hoc committees by consensus of the SDMC, chair standing committees and ad hoc committees, submit minutes to the principal for committee meetings, and report the recommendations to the SDMC. The SDMC is responsible for approving all professional development plans for the school. 3 3/10/2015 3:19 PM The Principal coordinates the process of shared decision making, facilitates communication for all stakeholders, considers issues and recommendations from the community, SDMC, and standing committees, and makes decisions based on those recommendations. Shared Decision Making Process Consensus is the ultimate goal of the SDMC. Consensus is a collective process that provides a forum for full dialogue on appropriate/applicable responses to issues. SDMC reviews recommendations and reaches consensus. Sufficient consensus is defined as a willingness to settle an issue in favor of the majority. All points of view will be considered and general agreement must be reached before decisions will be implemented. If general agreement is not reached, further study of the issue will occur and alternatives will be presented until agreement is reached. After all alternatives have been explored, a deadlock can be broken by a majority vote. As issues come up for discussion, the chairperson is responsible for ensuring that all present have a legitimate opportunity to state their case. The principal retains the authority to exercise a veto over decisions made by the SDMC. Method of Communications Members of the school community may submit non-personnel issues for consideration through the shared decision-making process. Written issues or concerns are submitted to any SDMC member or placed in the SDMC box located in the main office. A school community member may attend a meeting of any committee to discuss or present an issue. All meetings are on the calendar. The SDMC delivers issues to appropriate standing committees for action. Communications from all committees is transmitted to faculty, staff, and parents. Membership Composition of the SDM Number of Classroom Teachers Number of School-based Staff (Half the number of classroom teachers) Number of Non-Instructional Staff 7 4 2 Number of Parents (at least 2) Number of Community Members (at least 2) Number of Business Members 2 2 1 (Modify or insert additional lines as needed) Name of SDMC Member Monica Hawthorne Assyline Pickrom Jesse Trotter Kayla Johnson Angira Sceusi Yi-Hsuan Chen Chad High Nichole Gamez Yule Everline Tisha Mesa Robert Michaels-Johnson Griselda Casas Jasmine Pickney Tony Barrientos Martha Zamora Position (Term expires) Classroom Teacher (2015) Classroom Teacher (2015) Classroom Teacher (2015) Classroom Teacher (2014) Classroom Teacher (2014) Classroom Teacher (2014) Classroom Teacher (2015) School-based Staff (2015) School-based Staff (2015) School-based Staff (2015) School-based Staff (2015) Non-instructional Staff (2015) Non-instructional Staff (2015) Parent (2015) Parent (2015) 4 3/10/2015 3:19 PM Susanne Morrell Anne Sloan Emily Cole Community Member (2016) Community Member (2016) Business Member (2016) 5 3/10/2015 3:19 PM NEEDS ASSESSMENT Narrative of Data Analysis and Root Causes (causal factors) A thoughtful review of relevant campus data was conducted. Data points included STAAR, TEA Accountability, Advanced Placement, SAT, Voice Survey, campus discipline, and campus attendance results from 2013-2014. Participating in this disaggregation were members of the campus SDMC, which included campus administrative and instructional leadership, as well as broader school community representation. An awareness of impending district and campus initiatives also influenced the evaluation of data and assisted in establishing goals for the 2014-2015 academic year. Essentially, although campus instruction generally appears to effectively reach the student population “in the middle”, the needs of the populations at the extremes are not being met. Students most at risk are not performing on par with their less at risk counterparts. On the other hand, students with the highest demonstrated potential, are not performing up to that potential. The causes of these disparities were found, in general, to be rooted in lesser effective instructional methodologies, lax formative assessment disaggregation, and anemic academic performance goals. Narrative of Identified Needs Although progress toward 2013-2014 goals were noted, on STAAR the campus continued to struggle in effectively reaching the most at risk populations in mathematics and English Language Arts instruction. English Language Learners and Special Needs students demonstrated negative grow in Algebra I and in both levels of English Language Arts. These populations scored 30-50% below the general student population. Additionally, despite a focus on more rigorous instruction, performance on STAAR at the Advanced Level was lackluster across all state assessed subjects. On no one subject did first time testers score above the 10% threshold. The implementation of differentiated instruction appears to continue to be a challenge in instruction. Advanced Placement testing saw a similar struggle with students underperforming their earlier demonstrated potential. Using AP Potential as a guide, only 33% of students who previously demonstrated the capacity to score 3 or higher on an AP examination, met that goal. A misalignment of instructional practices and academic expectations with student potential appears evident. Additionally, it may be concluded that schedulers are not always consulting the AP Potential to collar students most likely to score well on specific subject exams. Campus safety and security are always of pressing importance. To that end, Reagan consistently seeks ways to improve campus security and safeguard student wellbeing. Holes in last year’s security duty schedule were noted and efforts have been taken to ensure the closure of these gaps. The security staffing increase begun in 2013 will continue to be funded. Due to the implementation of Linked Learning, a second school counselor will also be funded. Additional faculty and staff training on intruder sensitivity and lockdown drills will be increased. A review of the 2014 VOICE survey revealed some mixed results. The campus overall raking remained the same from the last academic year. Student participation in the survey was high, but parent and community feedback was minimal. Since Reagan has an active Parent-Teacher Organization, there appears to be a disconnect between the PTO and parent participation in the VOICE Survey. To obtain a more accurate picture of parent and community perceptions of Reagan, it is important to establish methods to encourage greater levels of participation in the survey process. Following the in-depth data analysis, needs assessment and development of the campus SIP, the campus must indicate on this table that any unmet or barely met accountability standards have been addressed: Performance Index Met? Y/N Unmet or barely met Subject(s) / Measure(s)? Student Group(s) Below Standard? Needs addressed in the following SIP Goal(s): Texas Accountability System I. Student Achievement Yes Click here to enter text. II. Student Progress n/a Click here to enter text. III. Closing Gaps Yes Click here to enter text. IV. Postsecondary Readiness Federal System Safeguards Reading Performance Yes Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Yes Click here to enter text. Reading Participation Yes Click here to enter text. Reading Alt/Mod Yes Click here to enter text. Math Performance Yes Click here to enter text. Math Participation Yes Click here to enter text. Math Alt/Mod n/a Click here to enter text. 4 Year Graduation Yes Click here to enter text. 5 Year Graduation Yes Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. STAFF DEVELOPMENT PLANS To better address the needs of all student demographics and specifically those most at need, as well as those with the greatest potential, Reagan will implement the following multi-tiered professional development plan. Abydos Training – Using two campus based Training of the Trainer faculty members, ELA I and ELA II PLC members will be the first to receive Abydos training. These will be Saturday sessions beginning late in the fall semester and will progress into the spring, prior to STAAR testing. Teacher Tutorial Training – A district and campus recognized highly effective teacher will provide after school training for Saturday School student tutorials. She will share her methodology using a one-tofour model and will share the process for targeting specific needs based on students’ past academic and STAAR performance. eTool Harmony Training – PowerUp training for all faculty will be provided through weekly Teachnology Tuesdays and monthly Dog Chow (lunchtime PD sessions). Sessions will be facilitated by the campus Instructional Technologist and Instructional Coaches - teacher leaders who are part of the district’s Career Pathways initiative. District scheduled Early Release Days will also be used for PowerUp and district HUB training. Campus Book Study – Every Child, Every Day will be the campus-wide book study. Participation in the study is built into every teachers’ IPDP and into a monthly study guide to be completed in PLCs. AP Training and Vertical Articulation – PLC Leaders have been assigned a common planning periods by departments to facilitate discussions on vertical articulation. Additionally, monthly vertical 7 3/10/2015 3:19 PM teaming meetings will be held during Wednesday before school teacher duty time. All Pre-AP teachers not previously trained will be afforded the opportunity to receive Pre-AP training and AP teachers will have the opportunity to participate in district PLC Groups and to complete regional training updates. IB Training – New faculty who teach within the Middle Years Programme will be scheduled for the appropriate IB training. Additionally, identified potential IB Diploma Years teachers will receive ongoing training and support in developing IB Course Guides. Campus-wide all teachers will continue to be trained in the IB philosophy, Learner Profile, and IB Unit Planning. Career Pathways Leadership – Proven highly effective teacher leaders will be identified and trained to assume teacher coaching responsibilities, primarily working with new and developing teachers, as well as other emerging teacher leaders. They will assist in facilitating Dog Chow and Teach-nology sessions and will conduct walk-through observations with follow-up feedback coaching sessions with an assigned cohort of teachers. 8 3/10/2015 3:19 PM SIP Part 2: Goals & Objectives – Planning, Implementing, Monitoring Based on the Data Analysis and Needs Assessment, the following Goals and Objectives have been developed to address the identified needs: GOAL AREA I: Reading See: Campus Literacy Plan (a copy of the Campus Literacy Plan is kept with this template) The 2014-2015 Campus Literacy Plan will serve as the Reading Goal for all schools. This plan must be developed in collaboration with the SDMC and submitted for review and approval along with the rest of the SIP document. The campus may provide a brief summary of the attached document here: The Literacy Plan for Reagan High School strives to meet the expectation of the Houston Independent School District in providing a roadmap to increase overall student literacy. It addresses the development of students’ reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills across the curriculum content areas. Through formative assessments, which incorporate authentic and purposeful literacy expectations, Reagan students will strengthen existing skills and build new levels of literacy competence. By actively participating in meaningful and effective classroom instruction, students will develop academic language, digital literacy, and research skills. This plan is intended to help prepare Reagan students for participation in social, political, and academic discourse. 9 3/10/2015 3:19 PM GOAL AREA I: Mathematics Priority Need: Critical Success Factor(s): Goal: Increase student Level II: Satisfactory Performance on STAAR Algebra I Improve Academic Performance Close the achievement gap by increasing the percentage of At Risk students meeting the Level II: Satisfactory Performance on the 2015 administration of the Algebra I STAAR exam from 75% to 80%. Strategy Objective Responsible Resources Utilize an Instructional Coach for Math with an emphasis on Algebra I Development of differentiated instruction to meet the needs of At Risk students. Career Pathway Instructional Coach, Dean of Instruction, Algebra I PLC Leader Budgeted Stipend, Release Instructional Time, PowerUp Resources/Strategies, EdPlan, High School Collaborative Participation August 2014 – May 2015 Integration of Instructional Technology Enhance instruction through engaging instructional strategies. Algebra I PLC Leader and Team, Instructional Coach, Instructional Technologist, Dean of Instruction PowerUp Resources/Strategies, BYOD for the Fall Semester, SmartBoards, Student Response System August 2014 – May 2015 Reduction of TeacherStudent Classroom Ratios Smaller class sizes to assist with providing more individualized instruction. Dean of Instruction, Academy Deans, Instructional Coach Master Schedule, Faculty FTEs, Classroom Space, Technology Resources August 2014 – May 2015 Milestone Monitoring to be completed by Campus Intervention Team/SDMC/Leadership Fall Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Click here to enter a date. 10 3/10/2015 3:19 PM Timeline Milestones/ Evaluation Common Assessment Data, Fall Semester Collaborative Final Exam Data, Student Grades, PLC Planning Documents, Classroom Coaching and Observation Feedback Monthly Review of Lesson Plans and other PLC Planning Documents, Training Roster for Teach-nology Tuesdays and Dog Chow PD. Common Assessment Data, PLC Planning Documents, Master Schedule Course Loads Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Mid-Year Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Click here to enter a date. Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Click here to enter a date. Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? Goal met? Click here to enter a date. Spring End of Year 11 3/10/2015 3:19 PM GOAL AREA I: Other Academic Priority Need: Critical Success Factor(s): Goal: Strategy Increase student passing scores on Advanced Placement exams Improve Academic Performance Increase the overall percentage of students demonstrating the achievement of their AP Potential from 33% to 50%. Objective Responsible Provide Targeted Professional Development Increase teacher classroom instructional effectiveness Advanced Academics Administrator, Dean of Instruction, Instructional Coaches, PLC Teacher Leaders Create Advanced Placement Vertical Teams Lay a foundation of Advanced Placement expectations in lower level, supportive course work Advanced Academics Administrator, Dean of Instruction, Instructional Coaches, AP Teachers Organize Student Exam Prep Workshop Address students’ recognized weaker content objectives Advanced Academics Administrator, Dean of Instruction, Instructional Coaches, AP Teachers Resources Funding for Participation and Travel to Local and Regional AP Trainings, Designated Time and Personnel for CampusBased Professional Development, College Board Materials such as Released Tests Designated Time and Personnel for CampusBased Professional Development and Collaboration with Vertical Teams. Funding for Extra Duty Pay for Trainings, College Board Materials such as Released Tests Planning Time and Facilities Use, Extra Duty Pay for Faculty Leaders, Funds to Purchase Student Incentives 12 3/10/2015 3:19 PM Timeline August 2014 – May 2015 Milestones/ Evaluation Mid-year mock AP Exam Administration Results, Training Logs and Debriefings, Training Rosters, Student Exam Scores August 2014-2015 Mid-year mock AP Exam Administration Results, Training Logs and Debriefings, Training Rosters, Student Exam Scores March 2015 – April 2015 Student Rosters, Feedback Evaluation Forms from Faculty and Students, Student Exam Scores Milestone Monitoring to be completed by Campus Intervention Team/SDMC/Leadership Fall Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Click here to enter a date. Mid-Year Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Click here to enter a date. Spring Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Click here to enter a date. Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? Goal met? Click here to enter a date. End of Year 13 3/10/2015 3:19 PM GOAL AREA II: Safety, Public Support, Public Confidence Priority Need: Critical Success Factor(s): Goal: Strategy Increase and maintain a secure and safe school environment Improve School Climate Reduce the number of unsafe school incidents as defined by the HISD Code of Student Conduct by an additional 3% during the 2014-2015 academic year. Objective Responsible Bullying Prevention Reduce number of incidents Counselors, Dean of Students, Campus Safety Team, Academy Deans Discipline Management Reduce number of student suspensions Counselors, Dean of Students, Campus Safety Team, SAMS Officer, Academy Deans Digital Citizenship Prevent rise in number of incidents due to inauguration of PowerUp Instructional Technologist, Dean of Instruction, Instructional Coaches, Dean of Students, Academy Deans, Counselors Resources Add Linked Learning Counselor, Access District, County, and State Training Resources, Continue Added Security Officers Funding Houston PD, County and State Law Enforcement Agencies, District Trainings, District Trainings, DOS Led Norming, Continue Added Security Officers Funding Use of Common Sense Media.org resources, District Cyber Trainings, Classroom Instruction Supplemental Resources Milestone Monitoring to be completed by Campus Intervention Team/SDMC/Leadership Fall Date of Review Click here to enter a date. 14 3/10/2015 3:19 PM Timeline August 2014 – May 2015 Milestones/ Evaluation Semester and Year End Data Summaries of Incident Reports, Training Rosters August 2014 – May 2015 Semester and Year End Data Summaries of Incident Reports, Training Rosters August 2014 – May 2015 Training Rosters, PLC Planning Documents, Semester and Year End Data Summaries of Incident Reports Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Mid-Year Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Click here to enter a date. Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Click here to enter a date. Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? Goal met? Click here to enter a date. Spring End of Year 15 3/10/2015 3:19 PM GOAL AREA IV: Parent & Community Involvement Priority Need: Critical Success Factor(s): Goal: Strategy Increase community participation in the Voice Survey Increase Family and Community Engagement Increase the authenticity of parent responses to the Voice Survey by increasing the number of respondents from 6% to 15% of the total number of distributed surveys. Objective Responsible Resources Increase Parent Awareness Parents will participate in the survey when they a better aware of its existence and purpose Title I Coordinator, PTO Officers, Instructional Coordinator, Campus Technologist Share 2014 Survey Results Parents will more likely participate in future surveys when they witness the impact of participation Parents will more likely complete the survey if easier access to the survey is provided Title I Coordinator, PTO Officers, Instructional Coordinator School Marquee, Phone Call Out System, School Website, Direct Mail Expenses, Time in PTO Agenda, Student Newspaper, 3rd Floor Productions Spot Time in PTO Agenda, School Marquee, School Website, Student Newspaper, 3rd Floor Productions Spot Parent Access to Specially Created Computer Labs or School Library, Morning and Early Evening Open Labs, Funding for Lab Coverage Increase Access to Survey Completion Title I Coordinator, PTO Officers, Instructional Coordinator, Library Staff, Campus Technologist Milestone Monitoring to be completed by Campus Intervention Team/SDMC/Leadership 16 3/10/2015 3:19 PM Timeline January 2015 – May 2015 Milestones/ Evaluation PTO Agendas, Portfolio of Promotions, 2015 Survey Results September 2014 – January 2015 PTO Agendas, Portfolio of Promotions, 2015 Survey Results April 2015 – May 2015 PTO Agendas, Portfolio of Promotions, Parent Lab Sign-Ins, 2015 Survey Results Mid-Year Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? On track? Modifications? Click here to enter a date. Date of Review Major intervention(s) Data reviewed Achievements? Challenges? Goal met? Click here to enter a date. End of Year 17 3/10/2015 3:19 PM Special Funding Goals Goal Area: Title I Ten Components (standard language provided, update data) 1. Comprehensive needs assessment – All data were reviewed for all students and student groups. The results and conclusions of this review are reflected in the SMART goals and the Executive Summary for the next school year. The components of the campus needs assessment include the: establishment of a school wide planning team, clarification of the campus vision with a focus on reform, creation of the school profile, identification of data sources and analysis of the data. 2. School-wide reform strategies – The continued use of the student information system to identify and monitor student growth; the continued use of district Unit Planning Guides and the staff development which accompanies it; the use of Exemplar Lessons and the meeting by content and grade level to monitor; and develop instructional plans are part of our school-wide reform strategies. 3. Instruction by highly qualified teachers – 100% of our teachers are certified for the position they hold. They have varying levels of experience, and support is given to less experienced teachers by their colleagues. Parents are notified if a teacher is not certified and the teacher must either be working toward certification or efforts continue to hire someone who is certified. 4. High-quality and on-going professional development – Lead Teachers who receive training during the summer and during the school year, provide on-site training and monitoring to assist in professional development. The Shared Decision-Making Committee identifies areas in which staff development is needed. Staff members participate in staff development offered by the District. Staff development may also be done on site by in-house instructional leaders and also by administrative district instructional support staff. 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers – Recruitment and retention of teachers who are certified for positions for which they are appropriately certified is ongoing. We closely work with our district’s HISD Personnel officer and network with other principals to help in this effort; our own teachers also serve as recruiters. The result has been that 100% of our classroom teachers are appropriately certified for the position they hold. 6. Strategies to increase parental involvement – Family Math, Science and Literacy Nights are held to increase parents in the school’s programs. Open Houses, frequent telephone contact and weekly folder updates/newsletters are methods of recognizing parents as partners. In addition, parents are offered classes to meet their needs, for example ESL classes or STAAR information programs. 7. Transition from early childhood programs – Early Childhood Centers collaborate with receiving elementary schools to coordinate parent and student visits to kindergarten programs. Elementary schools conduct community awareness campaigns, on-site meetings at the ECCs and Head Start programs, and round up and registration days to distribute information about programs and registration. Newsletters are distributed from receiving elementary schools. Not applicable to secondary schools. 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding the uses of academic assessments – Ongoing staff development is available on site to analyze assessment data, whether national, state or teacher produced, to use in making instructional decisions. Grade level or departmental meetings and the SDMC provide forums to discuss assessment issues. 9. Effective, timely additional assistance – The use of formative and summative assessments allow for individual student progress to be monitored at the teacher level, building and administrative district levels so that interventions and assistance will be timely. Coordination and integration of Federal, State, and local services and programs – At the building level, federal, state and local services and programs are coordinated to best address student needs; this coordination of services and programs is reflected in the activities listed in the campus goals and activities. Goal Area: State Compensatory Education (standard language provided, update data) Total amount of State Compensatory Education funds: $128,200.00 Personnel funded with State Compensatory Education funds: 2 List names here: Elizabeth Payne, LPAC Chair and Title I Coordinator and Lucy Seward, ESL and Advanced Placement Teacher Total number of FTE’s funded with State Compensatory Education funds: 2 Brief description of how these funds are utilized on your campus: These supplemental State Compensatory Education funds are used to enhance the Title I School Program at our campus. State Compensatory Education funds are coded in the Resources column of the SIP Part 2 as SCE. $XX. 19 3/10/2015 3:19 PM SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2014-2015 Campus Name: John H. Reagan High School The faculty, staff, and community of John H. Reagan High School are committed to creating lifelong learners in an atmosphere of respect and responsibility. Students are encouraged to reach their maximum potential by promoting positive attitudes in a safe, nurturing environment and by establishing high standards of excellence, character, academics, and international mindedness. John H. Reagan High School provides students with a personalized learning environment through smaller learning communities comprised of career-related academies. As a part of a comprehensive high school, students are able to participate in numerous extra-curricular activities, while receiving a quality education focused on academic rigor and college/career readiness. Reagan is dedicated to the principle that students can achieve their intellectual, social, and physical potential through exposure to a quality education presented in a positive learning environment. For the 2013-2014 academic year, Reagan received an Accountability Rating of “Met Standard” from the Texas Education Agency. All rated indexes surpassed state target scores and the campus received six Distinction Designations including Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies. Additional distinctions were awarded in Closing Performance Gaps and Postsecondary Readiness. Reagan has been serving Houston and the Historic Heights community since 1926. One of Houston’s first schools, the campus was renovated in 2006. Students now learn in an historic landmark, while preparing for the academic challenges of the 21st century. As the home for Houston Independent School District’s Magnet School for Computer Technology, Reagan also sponsors four additional career pathway academies. These are the Academy of Business, the Academy of Health Science, the Academy of Engineering, and the Academy of Transportation Technology. Each academy, along with the thee magnet tracks of Computer Programming, Audio and Visual Production, and Digital Media and Web Technology, offers a sequence of career-related course work that leads to industry related recognition and/or certification. At Reagan High School every student is expected to develop into a life-long learner. Students engage in challenging courses connected to the real world, discover unique gifts and talents, experience personal achievement, and meet high expectations for learning and personal conduct. Reagan offers a full complement of core and core support classes in English Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, Social Studies, the Arts, Physical Education, and Languages Other than English. Additionally, Reagan offers twenty-five Advanced Placement and Pre-Advanced Placement courses and is a Neighborhood Vanguard school. Reagan provides student services in English as a Second Language, Behavior Support Services, Skills for Learning and Living, Community Based Vocational Instruction, Speech Therapy Services, and Classroom Support Facilitation for students with special learning needs. In 2013 Reagan became an International Baccalaureate World School authorized for the Middle Years Programme. This designation resulted in creating the first continuous IB feeder pattern in the Houston Independent School District. Currently, Reagan is also labeled as an IB Candidate School for the Diploma Years and will submit its official application for the Diploma Years Programme in the spring of 2015. The International Baccalaureate offers challenging educational programs designed to help students develop their intellectual, personal, emotional, and social skills to live, learn, and work in a rapidly globalizing world. Achieving IB authorization is a rigorous process requiring all faculty, staff, and campus leadership to have been trained to understand and implement the program framework. The 2014-2015 academic year Reagan will also see the inauguration of two additional campus initiatives, Linked Learning and PowerUp. Part of a district pilot program, Linked Learning will help students blend the classroom work of their core classes with the real world application from their Career Technology pathway. Students will experience instruction through the lens of a potential career. PowerUp is the district’s one-to-one technology initiative to provide each student with a laptop computer. Each classroom will become a 21st century learning hub. Throughout the fall semester teachers will receive professional development on integrating technology into instruction. Students will first receive their computers in January of 2015. Enrollment at Reagan High School has continued to grow. Recent numbers, grades nine through twelve, have been consistently over 2200. This has resulted in the campus being reclassified as 6A, according University Interscholastic League criteria. Student demographics have also experienced a slight shift over the past few years. Hispanic numbers in the student body have fallen to 83%, while African American numbers have risen to 12% and white to 5%. Approximately 77% of students are classified as Economically Disadvantaged, resulting in a campus-wide Title I designation. With a mobility rate under 10% and a falling attrition rate, Reagan is reversing the trends seen in many urban high schools. Students receiving services through Special Education remains under 10% and the number of English Language Learners has fallen to under 4%. With implementation of a credit recovery program and monitoring through a DRIP committee, graduation rates have continue to rise, currently hovering around 96% Fundamentally, a graduate from Reagan High School will be prepared to confidently pursue his/her academic, career, and life goals. Reagan’s mission is to create a college bound culture, guided by the following core values. o Student learning is derived from effective instruction and from an atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. o The school is a learning community with achievement standards that prepare students to be lifelong learners with multiple options for the future. o School has an important role in preparing students for a lifetime of active citizenship in our nation and across the globe. o As education professionals, the faculty and staff of Reagan High School consistently serve as advocates for student success. 21 3/10/2015 3:19 PM