NEW 12/4/09
Attachment A-1c
BOARD OF EDUCATION MONITORING SYSTEM: 2009–2010
Board Monitoring System: Goal 1-Section C
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose
The Houston Independent School District (HISD) exists to strengthen the social and economic foundation of
Houston by assuring its youth the highest-quality elementary and secondary education available anywhere. In
fulfilling this goal, the HISD Board of Education has designed a program to systematically monitor the district's
goals and core values. The Board Monitoring System will report on each goal and core value on a routine
basis. The goal currently under review is to MAINTAIN PROMOTION STANDARDS among students in
grades 1–8 (Goal 1, Section C).
Findings
Promotion Standards
x
At the end of the spring 2009 semester, 78 percent of HISD first- through eighth-graders met promotion
standards compared to 74 percent in 2008. After summer school 2009, the total percentage of firstthrough eighth-graders meeting promotion standards increased from 94 percent in 2008 to 96 percent
(Figure 1).
x
From 2007–2008 to 2008–2009, the percentage of students meeting promotion standards increased
from 71 to 73 percent, and the percentage promoted on the basis of committee decisions decreased
from 23 to 22 percent. The percentage of students retained because they did not meet promotion
standards decreased from 6 to 4 percent, and the percentage retained on the basis of committee
decisions remained less than 1 percent (Figure 2).
x
According to the students’ actual fall 2009 grade status (that is, comparing the grade levels of the
students who were enrolled in the 2008–2009 school year with their grade level in fall 2009), 82 percent
were promoted, 2 percent were retained, and 15 percent did not return. By comparison, in fall 2008, 85
percent were promoted, 4 percent were retained, and 11 percent did not return (Figure 3). Among
students who did return, 97 percent were actually promoted and 3 percent were retained.
x
Among the 25,956 spring 2009 students referred to summer school, 80 percent met promotion
standards and were promoted to the next grade. Thirteen percent, or 3,494 students, did not meet
promotion standards and were retained in the same grade for the 2008–2009 school year. Six percent,
or 1,579 students, did not attend summer school. In 2008, 30,047 were referred to summer school: 77
percent were promoted, 15 percent were retained, and 8 percent did not attend (Figure 4).
x
The schools with 100-percent promotion rates based either strictly on promotion standards or through
committee decision were Macario Garcia and River Oaks Elementary Schools and Briarmeadow,
Energized for Excellence, Las Americas, North Alternative, and Project Chrysalis Middle Schools. The
following schools had a promotion rate of at least 99 percent: Charles Atherton, Charles E. Barrick,
Joyce Benbrook, Melinda Bonner, Luther Burbank, James Burrus, Barbara Bush, Al Condit, Garden
Oaks, Gary L. Herod, Jennie Kolter, Oak Forest, The Rice School/La Escuela Rice, T. H. Rogers, and
West University Elementary Schools and Henry Grady, Alexander Hamilton, Patrick Henry, James
BOARD OF EDUCATION MONITORING SYSTEM: 2009–2010
Hogg, Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, Sidney Lanier, Daniel Ortíz, Pin Oak, The Rice School/La Escuela
Rice, T. H. Rogers, William Stevenson, and West Briar Middle Schools.
x
Schools with a high percentage of students retained were Roderick Paige Elementary School (16.3
percent), Horace Elrod Elementary School (14.5 percent), and Eugene Field Elementary School (14.5
percent). A number of alternative and charter schools also had high retention rates, but this was often
due to low enrollment.
Administrative Response
The Houston Independent School District (HISD) consistently works to decrease student retention rates, and
improvement has been made from the 2007–2008 school year to the 2008-2009 school year. The district is
committed to ensuring that all schools have systems in place that promote effective instruction and high
student achievement, and that also support struggling students with appropriate interventions. Ongoing
monitoring and evaluation of these systems is critical in identifying educational opportunities. Two strategies
that have been implemented at the school-level to reduce retention and lead to student success are the use
of intervention teams and the use of retention reduction plans.
During the past two years, each intervention assistance team/response to intervention team, on all campuses,
has been provided an intensive three-day training to enhance their efforts. This collaborative, problemsolving team of professionals provides systemic support to “at-risk” students by:
x clarifying the student’s problem area,
x identifying specific needs, strengths and weaknesses of each child,
x analyzing contributing factors, and
x designing effective interventions.
Most importantly, the intervention team monitors students’ responses to interventions so that instruction is
appropriately adjusted. The campus intervention team receives assistance, as needed, to strengthen the
implementation of the three-tiered Response to Intervention Model.
Campuses that experienced large retention percentages for the 2007–2008 school year were required to
prepare a Retention Reduction Plan, a plan that requires schools to identify retained students as a basis for
understanding why those students failed. For example, in grades one and two, the High Frequency Word
Evaluation (HFWE) assessment resulted in the retention of the majority of the students. As a result of this
finding, teachers were trained to provide differentiated methods of teaching high frequency words to students;
best practices from similar campuses were implemented at all schools; and campuses were required to
maintain a retention template. That template includes a list of all students who have been retained according
to the following categories: name of student, name of teacher, reason for retention, TAKS results where
applicable, Stanford results where applicable, intervention strategies-specific to the failed area (not all areas)
and name of new teacher. Attention to classroom placement is a priority for all students who have been
retained.
Realizing the difficulties that retained students may encounter, school administrators are committed to
institutionalizing safety nets for students. Activities and strategies that facilitated a reduction in the campus
retention rate were identified, along with the persons responsible for monitoring the activities, to ensure that
they were implemented and completed. Budget needs and timelines were also noted. Ongoing evaluation
and continuous improvement in effectively meeting the needs of struggling students is critical and was
monitored by principals and executive principals.
Page 2 of 4
BOARD OF EDUCATION MONITORING SYSTEM: 2009–2010
Figure 1: Number and Percent of 2008-2009 Students in Grades 1-8 Who
Met or Did Not Meet Promotion Standards by Semester and Total
(2008 N=117,558 2009 N=116,870)
Number of Students
120,000
30,047
(26%)
100,000
25,956
(22%)
6,991
(6%)
5,084
(4%)
110,567
(94%)
111,786
(96%)
80,000
60,000
87,511
(74%)
40,000
90,914
(78%)
3,494
(14%)
4,506
(16%)
20,000
23,056
(84%)
0
2008
2009
20,833
(86%)
2008
Spring
2009
2008
Sum m er
Promoted
2009
Total
Retained
TARGETS: SPRING PROMOTION – 90%
SUMMER PROMOTION – 98.5%
Figure 2: Promotion Status of 2008-2009 Students in Grades 1-8
Based on Promotion Standards
(2008 N=117,558 2009 N=116,870)
120,000
Number of Students
26,044
(22%)
26,616
(23%)
100,000
80,000
60,000
85,742
(73%)
83,951
(71%)
40,000
116
(<1%)
20,000
0
2008
2009
Prom oted
Based on Promotion Standards
6,875
(6%)
2008
55
(<1%)
5,029
(4%)
2009
Retained
Committee Decision
Note: Promotion Standards data for each school are presented starting on page 5.
Page 3 of 4
BOARD OF EDUCATION MONITORING SYSTEM: 2009–2010
Figure 3: The Number and Percentage of 2008-2009 Students
Promoted or Retained Based on Actual Fall 2010 Status
(2008 N=117,558 2009 N=116,870)
120,000
99,595 (85%)
96,110 (82%)
Number of Students
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
13,125 (11%)
20,000
4,838 (4%)
17,890 (15%)
2,870 (2%)
0
2008
2009
Prom oted
2008
2009
Retained
2008
2009
Not Return
Note: 2009 percentages do not total 100% due to rounding.
Figure 4: Promotion and Retained Status of the Spring 2009
Students Referred to Summer School
(2008 N=30,047 2009 N=25,956)
25,000
23,056 (77%)
20,883 (80%)
Number of Students
20,000
15,000
10,000
4,506 (15%)
5,000
3,494 (13%)
2,485 (8%)
1,579 (6%)
0
2008
2009
Sum m er Prom oted
2008
2009
2008
Sum m er Retained
2009
Did Not Attend
Note: 2009 percentages do not total 100% due to rounding.
The number of students attending summer school (27,562 in 2008 and 24,377
in 2009) is the same as the number completing summer school, as the data file
does not distinguish between the two.
Page 4 of 4
310
215
489
415
233
605
239
439
371
510
231
616
296
313
170
461
513
617
644
42
355
606
306
350
522
455
226
479
409
428
408
460
School Name
Alcott
Allen
Almeda
Anderson
Ashford
Askew
Atherton
Barrick
Bastian
Bell
Bellfort Academy
Benavidez
Benbrook
Berry
Blackshear
Bonham
Bonner
Braeburn
Briargrove
Briarmeadow ES
Briscoe
Brookline
Browning
Bruce
Burbank ES
Burnet
Burrus
Bush
Cage
Carrillo
Codwell
Condit
409
393
456
33
331
561
286
324
517
419
225
477
385
365
497
207
577
294
307
145
401
507
573
636
278
193
446
401
226
552
237
435
19
15
4
9
24
45
20
26
5
36
1
2
24
6
13
24
39
2
6
25
60
6
44
8
32
22
43
14
7
53
2
4
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
60
80
34
249
60
113
79
90
110
88
15
27
69
171
67
62
100
70
92
58
231
99
131
45
49
14
63
94
23
85
30
84
Total
N
60
80
34
249
60
113
77
90
110
88
15
27
69
171
67
62
100
70
92
58
231
99
131
45
49
14
63
94
23
85
30
84
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
488
488
494
291
415
719
385
440
632
543
241
506
478
542
577
293
716
366
405
228
692
612
748
689
359
229
552
509
256
690
269
523
Total
N
469
473
490
282
391
674
363
414
627
507
240
504
454
536
564
269
677
364
399
203
632
606
704
681
327
207
509
495
249
637
267
519
96.1
96.9
99.2
96.9
94.2
93.7
94.3
94.1
99.2
93.4
99.6
99.6
95.0
98.9
97.7
91.8
94.6
99.5
98.5
89.0
91.3
99.0
94.1
98.8
91.1
90.4
92.2
97.2
97.3
92.3
99.3
99.2
19
15
4
9
24
45
22
26
5
36
1
2
24
6
13
24
39
2
6
25
60
6
44
8
32
22
43
14
7
53
2
4
Research and Accountability
3.9
3.1
0.8
3.1
5.8
6.3
5.7
5.9
0.8
6.6
0.4
0.4
5.0
1.1
2.3
8.2
5.4
0.5
1.5
11.0
8.7
1.0
5.9
1.2
8.9
9.6
7.8
2.8
2.7
7.7
0.7
0.8
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
NEW 12/04/09
Attachment A-1c
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
Total
N
Elementary Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009
5
408
480
668
157
542
253
438
438
426
405
363
245
155
310
471
337
304
492
873
206
351
237
294
307
325
383
404
244
597
439
234
338
School Name
Cook
Coop
Cornelius
Crawford
Crespo
Crockett
Cunningham
Daily
Davila
De Chaumes
De Zavala
Dodson
Dogan
Durham
Durkee
Eliot
Elrod
Emerson
Energized for Excellence Acad ES
Field
Foerster
Fondren ES
Foster
Franklin
Frost
Gallegos
Garcia
Garden Oaks
Garden Villas
Golfcrest
Gordon
Gregg
407
203
321
172
314
232
258
286
288
373
404
241
556
400
396
350
219
142
292
463
322
254
446
808
376
453
626
153
509
248
421
412
32
31
17
34
37
5
36
21
37
10
0
3
41
26
9
13
26
13
18
8
15
50
46
65
32
27
42
4
33
5
17
26
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
67
57
50
35
174
60
61
113
83
21
172
71
120
35
36
74
72
42
27
63
51
40
77
77
151
75
33
16
80
30
36
69
Total
N
67
56
49
34
174
60
61
113
82
21
172
71
120
35
36
74
72
42
27
63
51
40
77
77
151
75
33
16
80
30
36
69
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
506
291
388
241
525
297
355
420
408
404
576
315
717
461
441
437
317
197
337
534
388
344
569
950
559
555
701
173
622
283
474
507
Total
N
474
259
370
206
488
292
319
399
370
394
576
312
676
435
432
424
291
184
319
526
373
294
523
885
527
528
659
169
589
278
457
481
93.7
89.0
95.4
85.5
93.0
98.3
89.9
95.0
90.7
97.5
100.0
99.0
94.3
94.4
98.0
97.0
91.8
93.4
94.7
98.5
96.1
85.5
91.9
93.2
94.3
95.1
94.0
97.7
94.7
98.2
96.4
94.9
32
32
18
35
37
5
36
21
38
10
0
3
41
26
9
13
26
13
18
8
15
50
46
65
32
27
42
4
33
5
17
26
Research and Accountability
6.3
11.0
4.6
14.5
7.0
1.7
10.1
5.0
9.3
2.5
0.0
1.0
5.7
5.6
2.0
3.0
8.2
6.6
5.3
1.5
3.9
14.5
8.1
6.8
5.7
4.9
6.0
2.3
5.3
1.8
3.6
5.1
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
Total
N
Elementary Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009
6
140
218
573
501
1
399
319
215
439
285
448
199
479
670
196
495
517
306
439
244
275
308
283
182
240
364
345
374
417
449
386
448
School Name
Gregory-Lincoln ES
Grimes
Grissom
Gross
Halpin Center
Harris, J. R.
Harris, R. P.
Hartsfield
Harvard
Helms
Henderson, J. P.
Henderson, N. Q.
Herod
Herrera
Highland Heights
Hines-Caldwell
Hobby
Hohl
Horn
Houston Gardens
Isaacs
Janowski
Jefferson
Jones, J. W.
Kashmere Gardens
Kelso
Kennedy
Ketelsen
Kolter
Lantrip
Law
Lewis
430
358
414
230
265
294
278
178
214
349
338
365
414
432
277
433
194
476
655
183
477
492
284
431
135
199
554
454
0
377
297
201
19
28
34
14
10
14
5
4
26
15
7
9
3
7
8
15
5
3
15
13
18
25
22
8
5
19
19
47
1
22
22
14
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
30
99
50
28
42
113
122
40
18
20
23
35
26
22
82
69
17
56
54
17
87
73
33
21
43
60
75
127
0
31
86
51
Total
N
30
99
50
28
42
109
122
40
18
20
23
34
26
22
82
69
17
56
54
17
87
73
33
21
43
60
75
127
0
31
85
51
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
479
485
498
272
317
421
405
222
258
384
368
409
443
461
367
517
216
535
724
213
582
590
339
460
183
278
648
628
1
430
405
266
Total
N
460
457
464
258
307
403
400
218
232
369
361
399
440
454
359
502
211
532
709
200
564
565
317
452
178
259
629
581
0
408
382
252
96.0
94.2
93.2
94.9
96.8
95.7
98.8
98.2
89.9
96.1
98.1
97.6
99.3
98.5
97.8
97.1
97.7
99.4
97.9
93.9
96.9
95.8
93.5
98.3
97.3
93.2
97.1
92.5
0.0
94.9
94.3
94.7
19
28
34
14
10
18
5
4
26
15
7
10
3
7
8
15
5
3
15
13
18
25
22
8
5
19
19
47
1
22
23
14
Research and Accountability
4.0
5.8
6.8
5.1
3.2
4.3
1.2
1.8
10.1
3.9
1.9
2.4
0.7
1.5
2.2
2.9
2.3
0.6
2.1
6.1
3.1
4.2
6.5
1.7
2.7
6.8
2.9
7.5
100.0
5.1
5.7
5.3
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
Total
N
Elementary Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009
7
379
465
286
229
514
638
176
285
383
371
300
213
348
200
404
623
501
509
603
21
425
583
191
236
240
642
604
578
187
462
579
185
School Name
Lockhart
Longfellow
Looscan
Love
Lovett
Lyons
MacArthur
MacGregor
Mading
Martinez, C.
Martinez, R.
McDade
McNamara
Memorial
Milne
Mitchell
Montgomery
Moreno
Neff
North Alternative ES
Northline
Oak Forest
Oates
Osborne
Paige
Park Place
Parker
Patterson
Peck
Petersen
Piney Point
Pleasantville
405
520
171
16
404
581
170
219
194
590
590
559
170
341
362
295
195
305
191
364
605
481
478
546
367
439
275
221
498
624
162
277
57
59
14
5
21
2
21
17
46
52
14
19
17
42
9
5
18
43
9
40
18
20
31
57
12
26
11
8
16
14
14
8
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
69
98
45
6
67
33
152
27
43
109
39
62
37
45
33
119
43
163
37
87
156
65
54
137
48
76
87
57
19
31
55
8
Total
N
69
98
45
6
67
33
152
27
43
109
39
62
37
45
33
118
43
163
37
87
156
65
52
137
48
76
87
57
18
30
55
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
531
677
230
27
492
616
343
263
283
751
643
640
224
428
404
419
256
511
237
491
779
566
563
740
427
541
373
286
533
669
231
293
Total
N
474
618
216
22
471
614
322
246
237
699
629
621
207
386
395
413
238
468
228
451
761
546
530
683
415
515
362
278
516
654
217
285
89.3
91.3
93.9
81.5
95.7
99.7
93.9
93.5
83.7
93.1
97.8
97.0
92.4
90.2
97.8
98.6
93.0
91.6
96.2
91.9
97.7
96.5
94.1
92.3
97.2
95.2
97.1
97.2
96.8
97.8
93.9
97.3
57
59
14
5
21
2
21
17
46
52
14
19
17
42
9
6
18
43
9
40
18
20
33
57
12
26
11
8
17
15
14
8
Research and Accountability
10.7
8.7
6.1
18.5
4.3
0.3
6.1
6.5
16.3
6.9
2.2
3.0
7.6
9.8
2.2
1.4
7.0
8.4
3.8
8.1
2.3
3.5
5.9
7.7
2.8
4.8
2.9
2.8
3.2
2.2
6.1
2.7
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
Total
N
Elementary Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009
8
495
183
293
337
285
201
513
542
498
415
598
217
394
297
389
375
103
450
320
188
425
377
329
263
296
304
70
546
15
388
393
203
School Name
Poe
Port Houston
Pugh
Red
Reynolds
Rhoads
Rice School ES
River Oaks
Roberts
Robinson
Rodriguez
Rogers, T. H. ES
Roosevelt
Ross
Rucker
Sanchez
Sands Point
Scarborough ES
School at St. George Place
Scott
Scroggins
Seguin
Shadowbriar
Shearn
Sherman
Sinclair
Smith, E. O. ES
Smith, K.
South Alternative
Southmayd
Stevens
Stevenson ES
382
378
186
178
391
360
324
250
277
296
60
510
13
492
347
535
215
363
284
367
358
96
437
289
478
175
276
311
248
185
511
542
6
15
17
10
34
17
5
13
19
8
10
36
2
6
68
63
2
31
13
22
17
7
13
31
17
8
17
26
37
16
2
0
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
77
67
30
32
24
58
84
44
49
56
56
76
24
23
131
150
72
37
32
111
47
36
107
52
78
28
12
51
77
25
42
7
Total
N
77
67
30
32
24
58
84
44
49
56
56
76
24
23
131
148
72
37
32
109
47
36
107
52
77
28
12
51
77
25
42
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
465
460
233
220
449
435
413
307
345
360
126
622
39
521
546
748
289
431
329
500
422
139
557
372
573
211
305
388
362
226
555
549
Total
N
459
445
216
210
415
418
408
294
326
352
116
586
37
515
478
683
287
400
316
476
405
132
544
341
555
203
288
362
325
210
553
549
98.7
96.7
92.7
95.5
92.4
96.1
98.8
95.8
94.5
97.8
92.1
94.2
94.9
98.8
87.5
91.3
99.3
92.8
96.0
95.2
96.0
95.0
97.7
91.7
96.9
96.2
94.4
93.3
89.8
92.9
99.6
100.0
6
15
17
10
34
17
5
13
19
8
10
36
2
6
68
65
2
31
13
24
17
7
13
31
18
8
17
26
37
16
2
0
Research and Accountability
1.3
3.3
7.3
4.5
7.6
3.9
1.2
4.2
5.5
2.2
7.9
5.8
5.1
1.2
12.5
8.7
0.7
7.2
4.0
4.8
4.0
5.0
2.3
8.3
3.1
3.8
5.6
6.7
10.2
7.1
0.4
0.0
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
Total
N
Elementary Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009
9
588
386
428
354
285
571
319
462
350
143
530
107
180
114
Sugar Grove
Sutton
Thompson
Tijerina
Tinsley
Travis
TSU Charter Lab School
Turner
Twain
Valley West
Wainwright
Walnut Bend
Wesley
West University
Whidby
White
Whittier
Wilson
Windsor Village
Woodson ES
Young
Young Scholars
62,964
97
158
109
580
376
399
342
273
566
304
450
332
130
501
107
613
293
333
540
490
24
102
3,616
10
22
5
8
10
29
12
12
5
15
12
18
13
29
14
40
21
10
64
14
2
23
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
12,044
50
121
1
46
61
94
68
48
185
63
81
34
131
57
31
135
138
121
124
48
4
41
Total
N
12,020
50
121
1
46
61
94
68
48
184
63
81
33
131
57
31
135
138
121
124
48
4
41
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
78,624
157
301
115
634
447
522
422
333
756
382
543
384
274
587
152
788
452
464
728
552
30
166
Total
N
74,984
147
279
110
626
437
493
410
321
750
367
531
365
261
558
138
748
431
454
664
538
28
143
95.4
93.6
92.7
95.7
98.7
97.8
94.4
97.2
96.4
99.2
96.1
97.8
95.1
95.3
95.1
90.8
94.9
95.4
97.8
91.2
97.5
93.3
86.1
3,640
10
22
5
8
10
29
12
12
6
15
12
19
13
29
14
40
21
10
64
14
2
23
Research and Accountability
10
4.6
6.4
7.3
4.3
1.3
2.2
5.6
2.8
3.6
0.8
3.9
2.2
4.9
4.7
4.9
9.2
5.1
4.6
2.2
8.8
2.5
6.7
13.9
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
REVISED 12/09/09
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
66,580
121
653
314
343
604
504
26
125
School Name
Totals Elementary
Total
N
Elementary Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009
599
341
1
560
331
1
597
369
342
475
988
73
238
1,207
7
495
48
709
629
221
385
361
559
204
111
801
1,142
177
231
124
712
740
6
294
360
39
10
0
10
7
35
4
38
2
15
10
0
34
10
53
63
0
24
70
21
2
6
5
97
36
9
0
12
20
4
11
38
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
272
188
4
444
399
384
441
290
17
226
100
117
382
22
705
163
10
88
274
472
252
213
266
299
420
279
12
354
267
68
328
573
Total
N
272
188
4
444
398
384
441
290
17
226
99
117
382
21
703
163
10
88
274
471
252
213
266
299
420
279
12
354
267
68
328
573
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
871
529
5
1,051
775
761
920
1,316
92
479
1,317
124
911
80
1,467
855
231
497
705
1,052
458
330
1,072
1,538
633
519
136
1,078
1,027
78
633
971
Total
N
832
519
5
1,041
767
726
916
1,278
90
464
1,306
124
877
69
1,412
792
231
473
635
1,030
456
324
1,067
1,441
597
510
136
1,066
1,007
74
622
933
95.5
98.1
100.0
99.0
99.0
95.4
99.6
97.1
97.8
96.9
99.2
100.0
96.3
86.3
96.3
92.6
100.0
95.2
90.1
97.9
99.6
98.2
99.5
93.7
94.3
98.3
100.0
98.9
98.1
94.9
98.3
96.1
39
10
0
10
8
35
4
38
2
15
11
0
34
11
55
63
0
24
70
22
2
6
5
97
36
9
0
12
20
4
11
38
Research and Accountability
11
4.5
1.9
0.0
1.0
1.0
4.6
0.4
2.9
2.2
3.1
0.8
0.0
3.7
13.8
3.7
7.4
0.0
4.8
9.9
2.1
0.4
1.8
0.5
6.3
5.7
1.7
0.0
1.1
1.9
5.1
1.7
3.9
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
Marshall MS
McReynolds MS
North Alternative MS
607
376
377
479
1,026
75
253
1,217
7
529
Henry MS
Hogg MS
Holland MS
Jackson MS
Johnston MS
Kaleidoscope MS
Key MS
Lanier MS
Las Americas MS
Long MS
Attucks MS
Black MS
Briarmeadow MS
Burbank MS
Clifton MS
CLC MS
Cullen MS
Deady MS
58
762
692
221
409
431
580
206
117
806
1,239
213
240
124
724
760
10
305
398
School Name
Dominion Academy MS
Dowling MS
Edison MS
Energized for Excellence Acad MS
Fleming MS
Fondren MS
Fonville MS
Grady MS
Gregory-Lincoln MS
Hamilton MS
Hartman MS
Total
N
Middle Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009
21,222
387
117
958
283
61
551
1,016
204
151
520
1,240
950
119
363
395
315
95
898
18
14
9
52
4
22
1
7
30
8
20
4
0
16
1
1
6
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
12,962
489
204
282
223
24
570
280
189
426
452
497
174
16
419
59
69
260
Total
N
12,951
489
204
282
223
24
570
280
186
426
452
496
174
16
418
59
69
260
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
35,082
894
335
1,249
558
89
1,143
1,297
400
607
980
1,757
1,128
135
798
455
385
361
Total
N
34,173
876
321
1,240
506
85
1,121
1,296
390
577
972
1,736
1,124
135
781
454
384
355
97.4
98.0
95.8
99.3
90.7
95.5
98.1
99.9
97.5
95.1
99.2
98.8
99.6
100.0
97.9
99.8
99.7
98.3
909
18
14
9
52
4
22
1
10
30
8
21
4
0
17
1
1
6
Research and Accountability
12
2.6
2.0
4.2
0.7
9.3
4.5
1.9
0.1
2.5
4.9
0.8
1.2
0.4
0.0
2.1
0.2
0.3
1.7
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
REVISED 12/09/09
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
22,120
405
131
967
335
65
573
1,017
211
181
Sharpstown MS
Smith, E. O. MS
Stevenson MS
Thomas MS
WALIPP MS
Welch MS
West Briar MS
Williams MS
Woodson MS
Totals Middle
528
1,260
954
119
379
396
316
101
Ortiz MS
Pershing MS
Pin Oak MS
Project Chrysalis MS
Revere MS
Rice School MS
Rogers, T.H. MS
Ryan MS
School Name
Total
N
Middle Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009
242
553
47
273
70
62
267
Carter Career Center
CEP SE
CEP SW
Community Services
Harper
Inspired for Excellence Academy North
Inspired for Excellence Academy West
JJAEP
Kandy Stripe Academy
Pilgrim
Pro-Vision
Rusk
SOAR
Texas Connections
Wharton
1,556
85,742
237
515
39
260
0
56
258
2
91
78
0
4
8
8
0
515
5,029
5
38
8
13
70
6
9
3
136
162
0
6
26
30
3
Promotion Standards
Promoted
Retained
N
N
1,093
26,099
48
144
100
60
0
0
11
18
314
249
28
16
27
42
36
Total
N
1,073
26,044
44
144
100
60
0
0
11
18
313
249
22
15
27
42
28
20
55
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
1
0
0
8
Committee Decisions*
Promoted
Retained
N
N
3,164
116,870
290
697
147
333
70
62
278
23
541
489
28
26
61
80
39
Total
N
2,629
111,786
281
659
139
320
0
56
269
20
404
327
22
19
35
50
28
83.1
95.6
96.9
94.5
94.6
96.1
0.0
90.3
96.8
87.0
74.7
66.9
78.6
73.1
57.4
62.5
71.8
535
5,084
9
38
8
13
70
6
9
3
137
162
6
7
26
30
11
Research and Accountability
13
16.9
4.4
3.1
5.5
5.4
3.9
100.0
9.7
3.2
13.0
25.3
33.1
21.4
26.9
42.6
37.5
28.2
%
Retained
N
N
%
Total Results
Promoted
REVISED 12/09/09
Percentages based on the total number of students promoted or retained. These figures do not include students withdrawn prior to year end or records with incorrect codes.
Source: Chancery Promotion Standards Extract (PSE) File through December 2, 2009
* Includes Grade Placement, ARD, and Attendance Committees; Principal Plans; and School Waivers. Many promotions by committee decision may actually reflect students meeting
promotion standards.
2,071
90,771
5
227
240
0
10
34
38
3
School Name
Totals Combined/Other
Totals HISD
Total
N
Combined-Level/Other Schools
HISD Promotion Standards Outcomes
2008–2009