ACTIVITY NAME
Naval District Washington
SmartEnergy CONOPS
Presented By: Captain Hugh Hemstreet
CO NAVFAC Washington
March 30, 2011
3/31/11
NAVFAC Washington Energy Initiatives
SmartEnergy
CONOPS
Tying it all together
2
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
NDW Energy Vision
NDW AMI Project
NDW DDC/SCADA Initiative
ARRA PV Project
NFESC Energy Audit Contract
Demand Response Program
FY10 ESPC/UESC Projects (Planned
Awards)
8.  FY10/11 ESPC/UESC Projects
(Preliminary Audits)
9.  Revised UEM Core Organization
10.  Energy Manager/REM Plan
11.  Utility Energy Project Rebates
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
3/31/11
NDW SmartEnergy CONOPS
OBJECTIVES
•  Reduce energy costs without impacting mission (also reduces
energy consumption)
•  Reduce O&M costs without impacting mission
•  Change operational behavior regarding energy to allow
transparent decisions regarding energy-saving opportunities
ACTION AREAS
1.  Manage Facilities to as-Designed Condition
2.  Indentify Energy Efficiency Upgrades
3.  Generate Stakeholder Metrics that Change Behavior
4.  Enhanced Demand Response
5.  Networked SCADA (Supervisor Control and Data
Acquisition)
3
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
3/31/11
Integration of SmartEnergy System with
NAVFAC Databases
• Monthly electric
meter data – kW/
kWh/p.f.
• HDD/CDD
• 24 hr weather
• 72 hr weather
• DR Signal
Data Warehouse
•  NAVFAC
Energy Prices
•  Utility commodity
prices
•  Future prices
from NIST 135
Raw Data
Other
External
Data
Operations
•  Facility condition,
deficiencies, costs, priorities
•  Construction features per
facility
• Work Orders
• WO Trends
Maximo
EE Opportunity
•  Maintenance planning
•  Work order management
•  Work order trends
Awareness
• Floor Plans
• EUI Metrics by
bldg #
Demand Response
RSIMS
•  GIS data for facilities
•  Floor plans
• Facility footprint
• Primary bldg enduse
Being migrated to CIRCUITS . . .
DRRS
FRES
CUBIC
•  Utility invoices by meter
•  Utility usage by meter
•  Energy cons per facility
•  Facility score – capability,
condition, capacity
Note: See additional database detail in Appendix
Data warehouse may be housed within CIRCUITS
4
CIRCUITS
•  Invoice approval and
processing
•  Utility invoices by meter
•  Utility usage
SCADA
Not directly used . . .
FCAP
• Meter/building #
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
DUERS
•  Energy consumption per
Base
•  Commodity cost
•  By aggregated unit
iNFADS
•  Primary source for utility
data
•  Footprint, allocation,
characteristics
Example: SmartEnergy Data Analytics
Dahlgren Peak Electricity Demand
Opportunities to
reduce?
Is NEX commissary
unusually high?
AVG = 101.2
AVG = 14.6
AVG = 48.1
AVG = 23.4
95%
Percent of Peak Load
(by Metered Building kWh/ft2 – FY2010)
tics
y
l
a
n
le A trative
p
m
Sa r Illus
ses
– fo rpo100%
Pu
90%
85%
80%
75%
70%
60%
1
5
Reduce on
weekends?
Reduce at
night?
65%
7
Admin/Other
(as Percentage of Seasonal Peak Demand)
(Summer Months - June '09 - June '10)
Comp
Intensive
MWR and
Support
General RDT&E
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
3
Day of We
5
12 8 10 6 4 7
0 2 ek (Mon =
1)
18 14 16 20 22 $1.0
$0.0
Nov 2010
FY07
2nd Qtr
FY08
500,000
Actual Rolling 12-month Utility Cost
$5.0M
Total FY10 Utility Budget
$5.5M
3,000,000 kWh
Monthly Electric Cost
$300,000
Bldg #
6
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
43
200
12
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700
Target
Energy Intensity
Outliers
Top 5 Consumers ($000’s)
FY10
RDT&E Buildings
FY09
160
120
80
40
0
123
60
80
94
17
Bldg #
3-Month Ave
Region Ave
21/NA
Start
Funding
FY10
SP
FY11
NWCF
FY11
MILCON
FY13
SP
Thermal
P188- Lighting Retrofit
P120- Bldg 165- 1,000 more
employees
P190- Solar Panel Parking lot
0
NSWC
6
Bldg #
P160- Geothermal Heat Pumps
300
$40,000
HDD/CDD
IPL- Energy Related
600
FY10
78
5,000 mmBTU
Monthly Thermal Cost
4th Qtr
900
Electric Intensity
75
Total Square Footage
FY09
3rd Qtr
NSWC Energy Consumption
1,200
Top Energy Consumers
NSWC
Total Building Count
Monthly Thermal Consumption
$2.0
1st Qtr
Tenant:
Monthly Electric Consumption
$3.0
1,500
Top 5 Consumers ($000’s)
5
98
212
85
66
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700
FY10
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
FY09
RDT&E Buildings
Thermal Intensity
Date:
NSWC
NSWC Utility Cost by Qtr
$4.0
Total Energy
Consumption (000
BTU)
Tenant:
“Example”
$5.0
Electric
Base:
Utility Cost ($M’s)
Example: SmartEnergy Metrics Scorecard
160
120
80
40
0
96
82
100
4
18
Bldg #
3-Month Ave
Region Ave
Example: SmartEnergy Facility Management
Facility Operations Centers: Proposed Sites
Location
Fenceline(s) Covered
WNY*
WNY, NSF Suitland, NSF Naval Observatory, NSF
Arlington
NSF Naval Research
Laboratory
NSF Naval Research Laboratory,
NSF Chesapeake Beach
NSF Carderock
NSF Carderock
JBAB
Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling
NSF Annapolis
NSF Annapolis, US Naval Academy, North Severn, NOSC
Baltimore
NSA Bethesda
NSA Bethesda
NAS Patuxent River
NAS Pax (main base), NRC Solomons, OLF Webster Field
NSF Indian Head*
NSF Indian Head (main base), Stump Neck Annex
NSF Dahlgren*
NSF Dahlgren (main base), Pumpkin Neck Annex
*Note: 1 of 3 locations for NDW SmartEnergy pilot
7
NAVFAC WASHINGTON
3/31/11
Five Elements of NDW Energy Vision 2035
Mission Efficient
Comfortable Conditions
A: Efficient End-Use Technology
•
•
•
•
E: Cost-Effective
Renewables
•  Self-supporting electrical
and renewable thermal,
where cost effective
D: Aggressive Demand
Response
•  Generator dispatch
•  Building systems,
with no comfort impact
B: Cost-Efficient Energy Sources
and Distribution Infrastructure
•  Low cost energy sources
•  Efficient boiler/furnace
•  Efficient on-base distribution
C: Networked SmartEnergy Management
Capabilities
•
•
•
•
•
8
Tight building shell
Efficient lighting
Efficient mechanicals
Efficient plug loads
Adequate metering and controls
Well-tuned control system
Controlled to match needs
Regularly monitored performance
Periodically diagnosed for improvement
NAVFAC WASHINGTON