Survey of Entering
Student Engagement
College of the Mainland
2012 Key Findings
Table of Contents
Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice With Entering Students
Aspects of Highest Student Engagement
Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement
SENSE Special-Focus Module Items
Academic Goal Setting and Planning
2
4
5
6
8
1
Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice With Entering Students
SENSE Benchmarks
★ Early Connections
When students describe their early college
experiences, they typically reflect on occasions when
they felt discouraged or thought about dropping out.
Their reasons for persisting almost always include one
common element: a strong, early connection to
someone at the college.
★ High Expectations and Aspirations
Nearly all students arrive at their community colleges
intending to succeed and believing that they have the
motivation to do so. When entering students perceive
clear, high expectations from college staff and faculty,
they are more likely to understand what it takes to be
successful and adopt behaviors that lead to
achievement. Students then often rise to meet
expectations, making it more likely that they will attain
their goals. Often, students’ aspirations also climb, and
they seek more advanced credentials than they
originally envisioned.
★ Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
When a student, with knowledgeable assistance,
creates a road map—one that shows where he or she is
headed, what academic path to follow, and how long it
will take to reach the end goal—that student has a
critical tool for staying on track. Students are more
likely to persist if they not only are advised about what
courses to take, but also are helped to set academic
goals and to create a plan for achieving them.
Continued on Page 3
The Survey of Entering Student Engagement
(SENSE ) benchmarks are groups of conceptually
related survey items that address key areas of
entering student engagement. The six benchmarks
denote areas that educational research has shown to
be important to entering students’ college
experiences and educational outcomes; thus, they
provide colleges with a useful starting point for
looking at institutional results.
Ideally, colleges engage entering students in all six
benchmark areas, beginning with a student’s first
contact with the institution and continuing through
completion of the first three weeks of the initial
academic term. This time is decisive because
current research indicates that helping students
succeed through the first academic term can
dramatically improve subsequent success, including
completing courses and earning certificates and
degrees.
While many student behaviors and institutional
practices measured by the benchmarks can and
should continue throughout students’ college
careers, the SENSE items and the resulting data
focus on this critical entering student timeframe.
SENSE benchmark scores are computed by
averaging the scores on survey items composing the
benchmarks. Benchmark scores are standardized to
have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25
across all respondents.
Benchmark Scores
Figure 1a
90
80
70
66.1
60
50
50.0
51.5
56.7
50.0
61.1
55.2
50.0
44.0
40
30
20
Early Connections
College of the Mainland
High Expectations
and Aspirations
2012 SENSE Cohort
Clear Academic
Plan and Pathway
2012 Top-Performing Colleges*
*Top-Performing Colleges are those that scored in the top 10 percent of the cohort by benchmark.
Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 25 across all respondents. For further
information about how benchmarks are computed, please visit www.cccse.org.
2
Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice With Entering Students
SENSE Benchmarks
The standardized benchmark scores allow
colleges to gauge and monitor their performance
in areas of entering student engagement. In
addition, participating colleges have the
opportunity to make appropriate and useful
comparisons between their performance and that
of groups of other colleges.
Continued from Page 2
★ Effective Track to College Readiness
Nationally, more than six in 10 entering community
college students are underprepared for college-level
work. Thus, significant improvements in student
success will hinge upon effective assessment,
placement of students into appropriate courses, and
implementation of effective strategies to ensure that
students build academic skills and receive needed
support.
Performing as well as the national average or a
peer-group average may be a reasonable initial
aspiration, but it is important to recognize that
these averages are sometimes unacceptably low.
Aspiring to match and then exceed
high-performance targets is the stronger strategy.
★ Engaged Learning
Instructional approaches that foster engaged learning
are critical for student success. Because most
community college students attend college part-time,
and most also must find ways to balance their studies
with work and family responsibilities, the most effective
learning experiences will be those the college
intentionally designs.
Community colleges can differ dramatically on
such factors as size, location, resources,
enrollment patterns, and student characteristics.
It is important to take these differences into
account when interpreting benchmark
scores—especially when making institutional
comparisons. The Center for Community College
Student Engagement has adopted the policy
“Responsible Uses of CCSSE and SENSE Data,”
available at www.cccse.org.
★ Academic and Social Support Network
Students benefit from having a personal network that
enables them to obtain information about college
services, along with the academic and social support
critical to student success. Because entering students
often don’t know what they don’t know, colleges must
purposefully create those networks.
SENSE uses a three-year cohort of participating
colleges in all core survey analyses. The current
cohort is referred to as the 2012 SENSE Cohort
(2010-2012) throughout all reports.
For further information about SENSE benchmarks,
please visit www.cccse.org.
Benchmark Scores
Figure 1b
90
80
70
50
60.2
59.1
60
46.4
50.0
50.8
50.0
57.2
50.8
50.0
40
30
20
Effective Track to
College Readiness
College of the Mainland
Engaged Learning
2012 SENSE Cohort
Academic and
Social Support Network
2012 Top-Performing Colleges*
*Top-Performing Colleges are those that scored in the top 10 percent of the cohort by benchmark.
Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 25 across all respondents. For further
information about how benchmarks are computed, please visit www.cccse.org.
3
Aspects of Highest Student Engagement
Benchmark scores provide a manageable starting point for reviewing and understanding SENSE data. One way to
dig more deeply into the benchmark scores is to analyze those items that contribute to the overall benchmark score.
This section features the five items across all benchmarks (excluding those for which means are not calculated) on
which the college scored most favorably and the five items on which the college scored least favorably relative to
the 2012 SENSE Cohort.
The items highlighted on pages 4 and 5 reflect the largest differences in mean scores between the institution and the
2012 SENSE Cohort. While examining these data, keep in mind that the selected items may not be those that are
most closely aligned with the college’s goals; thus, it is important to review all institutional reports on the SENSE
online reporting system at www.cccse.org.
Figure 2 displays the aggregated frequencies for the items on which the college performed most favorably relative to
the 2012 SENSE Cohort. For instance, 76.8% of College of the Mainland students, compared with 62.2% of other
students in the cohort, responded strongly agree or agree on Item 18d. It is important to note that some colleges’
highest scores might be lower than the cohort mean.
Aggregated Percentage
Figure 2
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
83.5%
79.7%
76.8%
78.0%
71.3%
62.2%
49.1%
36.8%
18d
18g
Strongly agree or Agree Strongly agree or Agree
37.5%
31.2%
19e
At least once
19g
At least once
20f2
At least once
College of the Mainland
Table 1
2012 SENSE Cohort
Benchmark
Item
Number
Item
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
18d
Able to meet with an academic advisor at times convenient for me
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
18g
An advisor helped me to identify the courses I needed to take during my first
semester/quarter
Engaged Learning
19e
Frequency: Participated in supplemental instruction
Engaged Learning
19g
Frequency: Worked with other students on a project or assignment during class
Engaged Learning
20f2
Frequency: Used writing, math, or other skill lab
Notes:
For Item(s) 18, strongly agree and agree responses are combined.
For Item(s) 19, except 19c, 19d, 19f, and 19s, once, two or three times, and four or more times responses are combined.
For Item(s) 20, once, two or three times, and four or more times responses are combined.
4
Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement
Figure 3 displays the aggregated frequencies for the items on which the college performed least favorably relative to
the 2012 SENSE Cohort. For instance, 41.9% of College of the Mainland students, compared with 51.4% of other
students in the cohort, responded strongly agree or agree on Item 18i. It is important to note that some colleges’
lowest scores might be higher than the cohort mean.
Aggregated Percentage
Figure 3
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
63.8%
70.3%
74.7%
54.5%
51.4%
46.3%
41.9%
29.4%
35.8%
39.5%
18i
18j
18p
Strongly agree or Agree Strongly agree or Agree Strongly agree or Agree
19l
At least once
19o
At least once
College of the Mainland
2012 SENSE Cohort
Table 2
Benchmark
Item
Number
Item
Early Connections
18i
The college provided me with adequate information about financial assistance
Early Connections
18j
A college staff member helped me determine whether I qualified for financial
assistance
Early Connections
18p
At least one college staff member (other than an instructor) learned my name
Engaged Learning
19l
Frequency: Used an electronic tool to communicate with an instructor about
coursework
Engaged Learning
19o
Frequency: Received prompt written or oral feedback from instructors on your
performance
Notes:
For Item(s) 18, strongly agree and agree responses are combined.
For Item(s) 19, except 19c, 19d, 19f, and 19s, once, two or three times, and four or more times responses are combined.
5
SENSE Special-Focus Module Items
SENSE special-focus modules allow participating colleges and researchers to delve more deeply into areas of
student experience and institutional performance that are related to student success. As part of an ongoing national
initiative, the Center added a special-focus module exploring community college students’ participation in a
defined collection of promising practices to the 2012 SENSE administration. This module continues to elicit
information about entering students’ experiences associated with promising educational practices such as early
registration, freshman seminars, and early alert systems. Frequency results for five selected promising practices
items are displayed across pages 6 and 7.
Percentage
Figure 4: At this college, I completed registration before the first class sessions(s).
100 93.9% 92.0%
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
4.3%
Yes; I was
registered for
ALL of my
courses before
the first
class session(s)
4.2%
Mostly; I was
registered for
MOST of my
courses before
the first
class session(s)
1.3%
1.8%
Partly; I was
registered for
SOME of my
courses before
the first
class session(s)
0.4%
2.0%
No; I was NOT
registered for
ANY of my
courses before
the first
class session(s)
College of the Mainland (N= 221)
2012 Promising Practices Respondents (N= 47,301)
Percentage
Figure 5: I became aware that I was required to take a placement test (ACCUPLACER, ASSET, COMPASS, etc.) at this college:
100
90
80
70
55.7%
60
50 46.3%
40
30
20
10
0
More than a
month before
taking the test
21.1%
16.2% 16.2%
About 1 to 4
weeks before
taking the test
7.8% 8.1%
8.6% 6.7%
About 1 to 6
days before
taking the test
The same day
I took the test
College of the Mainland (N= 221)
2012 Promising Practices Respondents (N= 47,092)
6
13.3%
Not applicable;
I did not take
a placement test
Figure 6: At this college, I am participating in a structured experience for new students (sometimes called a "freshman seminar" or
"first-year experience").
100
90
82.9%
Percentage
80
71.2%
70
60
50
40
28.8%
30
20 17.1%
10
0
Yes
No
College of the Mainland (N= 219)
2012 Promising Practices Respondents (N= 46,808)
Percentage
Figure 7: At this college, my instructors clearly explained a class attendance policy that specified how many classes I could miss
without penalty.
100
90
80.0%
76.0%
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
13.8%
11.9%
6.8%
ALL of my
instructors
explained a
class attendance
policy
MOST of my
instructors
explained a
class attendance
policy
7.0%
SOME of my
instructors
explained a
class attendance
policy
1.3%
3.3%
NONE of my
instructors
explained a
class attendance
policy
College of the Mainland (N= 221)
2012 Promising Practices Respondents (N= 47,065)
Percentage
Figure 8: Someone at this college contacts me if I am struggling with my studies to help me get the assistance I need.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30 22.1%
19.2%
20
10
0
Yes
35.8%
39.7%
No
42.1% 41.2%
Not applicable;
I have not experienced
academic difficulties
at this college
College of the Mainland (N= 212)
2012 Promising Practices Respondents (N= 44,834)
7
Academic Goal Setting and Planning
Most community colleges have academic and goal setting policies that are intended to help all students start right.
Yet, often these policies, even when they are ostensibly mandatory, might not be implemented in ways that ensure
success for all students. The disaggregated data below illustrate the student experience with academic goal setting
and planning at your college. Nationally, more than 60% of community college students are enrolled less than full
time. Thus, while looking at these data, it is important to consider the institution’s enrollment patterns. Are all of
your entering students starting right?
Figure 9
100
90
80
Percentage
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Full-time
N= 182
Less than
full-time
N= 76
Full-time
N= 181
18e. An advisor
helped me to
select a course of
study, program, or major
Strongly agree
Less than
full-time
N= 75
Full-time
N= 182
18f. An advisor
helped me to
set academic goals
and to create a
plan for achieving them
Agree
Less than
full-time
N= 75
18g. An advisor
helped me to
identify the courses
I needed to
take during my
first semester/quarter
Neutral
Disagree
Full-time
N= 182
Less than
full-time
N= 75
18h. A college
staff member
talked with me
about my commitments
outside of school
to help me figure out
how many courses to take
Strongly disagree
Table 3
18e
Full-time
Strongly agree
31.3%
Agree
Neutral
18g
Full-time
Less than
full-time
28.9%
18.2%
33.5%
40.8%
15.9%
18.4%
Disagree
15.4%
Strongly disagree
3.8%
Response
8
18f
Less than
full-time
18h
Full-time
Less than
full-time
Full-time
Less than
full-time
16.0%
34.6%
34.7%
14.3%
12.0%
21.5%
33.3%
42.3%
46.7%
13.2%
21.3%
26.5%
28.0%
15.9%
10.7%
24.7%
26.7%
10.5%
26.5%
20.0%
4.9%
6.7%
34.1%
30.7%
1.3%
7.2%
2.7%
2.2%
1.3%
13.7%
9.3%