2011-12 PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM/UNIT REVIEW SELF STUDY

advertisement

2011-12

Truckee Meadows

Community College

School of Liberal Arts

PSYCHOLOGY

PROGRAM/UNIT REVIEW SELF STUDY

Psychology

DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM/UNIT

The Associate of Arts Degree in Psychology is designed for students seeking careers in psychology or related fields.

The degree requirements include a well-balanced general education curriculum. Specific curriculum provides students with major concepts, theoretical perspectives, and empirical findings in psychology. In addition, students will come to understand and apply basic research methods in psychology. This course of study is designed as a university transfer program that substantially meets the requirements for the first two years of study for the B.A. in Psychology at UNR.

In addition, students have the possibility to begin work on a minor in Addiction Treatment Services that is available at

UNR. Students wishing to transfer to any other baccalaureate program should work closely with TMCC advisors and advisors at the institution of transfer to obtain recommended courses for transfer.

Mission Statement

The Psychology discipline provides a breadth of quality introductory Psychology offerings. These offerings support a variety of student needs: general education, foundational coursework to pursue a degree in Psychology, core requirements for allied fields, and lifelong learning/personal interest needs. The Psychology discipline emphasizes quality instruction and a sound curriculum that will expose students to contemporary theories, research methods, and beginning skills used to interpret and use scientific psychological knowledge. The Psychology discipline serves to support the TMCC’s mission in terms of supporting general education, transfer degree programs , and occupational/technical degrees. In addition, the psychology faculty have been involved in supporting student services by providing consultation to College counselors, the Disability Resource Center, student tutoring centers, and have developed two student clubs (Psychology and Psi Beta, the honorary society in Psychology). Thus, the Psychology discipline is an important and integral part of the College and its mission.

Degrees, Certificates, and/or Non-Credit Courses offered

TMCC offers the following courses in the discipline of Psychology: PSY 101 – General Psychology, PSY 102 –

Psychology of Personal and Social Adjustment, PSY 109 – Learning Difficulties of the Student, PSY 130 – Human

Sexuality, PSY 207 – Psychology of the family, PSY 210 – Introduction to Statistical Methods, PSY 228 –

Psychology of Dreams, PSY 233 – Child Psychology, PSY 234 – Psychology of Adolescence, PSY 240 –

Introduction to Research Method, PSY 241 – Introduction to Abnormal Psychology, PSY 261 – Introduction to Social

Psychology, PSY 270 – Understanding Psychology through Film, PSY 275 – Undergraduate Research, PSY 276 –

Aging in Modern American Society, PSY 290 – Internship in Psychology, and PSY 299 – Special problems in

Psychology. Currently we also offer the Associate of Arts Degree: Psychology Emphasis

Primary Goals and Objectives

The primary goal of the Psychology discipline is to provide a quality educational experience that promotes students ’ ability to understand, interpret, and use scientific psychological knowledge across a variety of areas within

Psychology. This goal is supported by introducing students to basic theories, principles, research methods, and concepts in Psychology through coursework. Students also have separate objectives for taking Psychology courses that impact the discipline. Students generally are either meeting a general education and/or diversity requirement, a core requirement for an allied field of study (e.g., Applied Anthropology, Mental Health Technician, Mental Health

Developmental Disabilities Technician, Substance Abuse Counselor, Early Childhood Education Teacher), requirement for entry into other programs (e.g., nursing program at UNR requires completion of Psychology 210,

Truckee Meadows Community College | Description of Program/Unit 1

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW statistics, for admittance), foundational coursework for a degree in Psychology, or personal interest/lifelong learning goals, thus the courses must meet these diverse objectives as well.

Factors Expected to Affect Future

The American Psychological Association (APA) Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major suggested 10 goals and related learning outcomes for undergraduate education in Psychology programs. These goals were adopted by APA (August, 2006) and are grouped into two major categories: I. knowledge, skills, and values consistent with the science and application of psychology, and II. knowledge, skills, and values consistent with liberal arts education that are further developed in psychology. As mentioned in a previous report (2006), the TMCC Psychology discipline started its work on assessment with these goals in mind. In the past two years the Psychology discipline has reviewed and implemented the Master Course Outline with precise objectives and outcomes and measures to be adopted by each Psychology course offered at TMCC. A new assessment cycle plan was developed and collected data will be described later in this report. American Psychological Association (APA) Task Force on Undergraduate Education in

Psychology (May, 2003)

2 | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12

CURRICULUM

Program/Unit Review Assessment Reports

List title(s) of past Program/Unit Reviews; indicate whether a program, discipline, or course review.

X

The last comprehensive Psychology Discipline Assessment Report was completed in 2006, and is attached and labeled in this report as Appendix D.

Course Assessment Report Summaries

Prefix Number

PSY 101

Title

General Psychology

Indicate date of assessment in the department assessment cycle

Every Semester

PSY 102

PSY 130

Psychology of Per & Soc

Adjustment

Human Sexuality 2011

PSY 210 Intro to Stat Methods 2013

PSY 228

PSY 233

PSY 240

Psychology Of Dreams

Child Psychology

2011

2012

Intro to Research Methods 2012

PSY 241 Abnormal

Psychology

PSY 261 Intro Social Psychology 2013

PSY 276 Aging/Modern

Society

PSY 299 Spec Problems/Psychology As needed

PDCAR

Date

2010-11*

Modifications

Under Review

Under Review

Under Review

Under Review

Under Review

Under Review

Under Review

Under Review

The above table outlines the schedule of outcomes assessment for each Psychology class over the next three years. As the Psychology discipline’s outcomes assessment procedures are in the process of being implemented in a programmatic manner across the curricula, including data collection methodologies, no summary of data analysis and modifications made to classes is yet available.

Assessment Driven Improvements

As discussed in Appendix C, the outcomes assessment methodology is currently being implemented across the curricula following the established schedule discussed immediately above. A more standardized student learning outcomes assessment has been developed and piloted for Psychology 101 and the first valid data collection process is underway this Fall 2011 semester. Moreover, all full and part-time faculty members have been instructed by the

Dean of the School of Liberal Arts (SOLA) to conduct outcomes assessment data collection this Fall 2011 semester

(in accordance with the schedule above) and will be reporting their findings and discussions (including assessment driven implications of the analyses) in early Spring semester 2012. Given that the Psychology discipline is in the midst of establishing/implementing outcomes assessments standardized procedures in Psychology 101 starting in the

School of Liberal Arts | Curriculum 3

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW fall 2011 semester, and requiring all instructors to provide reports of individualized student learning outcomes assessment implications per the schedule above, no data is currently available about specific outcomes assessmentdriven improvements.

Evaluating Relevancy of Curriculum

Course Content

The course content is of high quality, rigorous, and appropriate. The course content is reviewed regularly by the faculty and the curriculum is updated as needed. Moreover, course content is modeled after the suggested ten goals as outlined in the American Psychological Association (APA) Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major and related learning outcomes for undergraduate education in Psychology programs. Last, each Psychology course has clearly enunciated student learning outcomes statements on the master course outlines (on file with the

College).

Degree/Certificate Requirements

The Psychology discipline currently offers an Associates of Arts Degree with an emphasis in Psychology. For specific details regarding the requirements for the AA, Psychology Emphasis, see Appendix B.

Methods of Instruction

Traditional and online courses are regularly offered in Psychology every term. During the 2010/2011 academic year, one Psychology Professor offered hybrid sections of Psychology 101 (e.g., a course that has a combination of lecture and online modalities), but this was discontinued this 2011/2012 academic year given this teaching platform was the least desired by students.

Faculty Qualifications

In order to qualify as a part or full-time Psychology faculty member, the individual must hold a minimum of a

Masters Degree in Psychology. Currently, the Psychology discipline has four full-time and fifteen part-time faculty members. Three of the 4 full-time Psychology faculty have earned doctoral degrees. Six of the 15 part-time

Psychology faculty members have earned doctoral degrees. There are two additional Psychology faculty defined as part-time that are employed full-time at TMCC; Maria Teirumniks, Ph.D. of the Sociology Department (teaching online Social Psychology) and Armida Fruzzetti, Ph.D., currently the Acting Dean of the School of Liberal Arts.

Post Completion Objectives (transfer, job placement, etc.)

Three of the TMCC mission statements/objectives are met within the Psychology discipline. First, students enroll in

Psychology classes to meet general education requirements and to complete lower division coursework in preparation to transfer to a university. This includes those transfer students interested in majoring in Psychology at a university who complete the applicable freshman and sophomore Psychology courses that will apply towards a Bachelor’s

Degree. Second, TMCC students pursuing various Associate of Applied Science Degrees take required Psychology courses, an example being that TMCC Nursing Students are required to complete Psychology 102. Third, some students take classes for life-long learning motivations, these individuals generally enrolling in more specifically focused courses such as Child Psychology.

Secondary Student Preparation Efforts

High School students who complete the Advanced Placement Psychology course in their respective high schools can earn credit for Psychology 101 at TMCC.

4 Curriculum | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12

External Review

N/A

Non-credit Training Offered

N/A

Curriculum Development Strategies

Assessment Findings and Strategies

Programmatic outcomes assessment procedures intended to collect the first valid and reliable student learning outcomes data are currently being implemented this fall 2011 semester. For a detailed discussion of this methodology and progress to date, see Appendix C.

External Resource Recommendations and Implementation Plans

N/A

Anticipated Factors Affecting Curriculum and Strategies

Student interest in online instruction and online assisted coursework has increased significantly. For example, for the Fall 2011 semester, psychology course offerings are as follows:

Psychology 101, 30 total sections, 23 lecture and 7 online classes

Psychology 102, 4 total sections, 2 lecture and 2 online

Psychology 130, 3 total sections, 1 lecture and 2 online

Psychology 210, 1 lecture section

Psychology 233, 2 total sections, 1 lecture and 1 online

Psychology 240, 1 lecture section

Psychology 241, 3 total sections, 2 lecture and 1 online

Psychology 261, one online section

For the Spring 2012 semester, the following courses are planned:

Psychology 101, 30 total sections, 23 lecture and 7 online classes

Psychology 102, 4 total sections, 2 lecture and 2 online

Psychology 130, 3 total sections, 1 lecture and 2 online

Psychology 210, 1 lecture section

Psychology 233, 2 total sections, 1 lecture and 1 online

Psychology 240, 1 lecture section

School of Liberal Arts | Curriculum 5

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

Psychology 241, 3 total sections, 2 lecture and 1 online

Psychology 261, one online section

Online instruction accounts for 31% of the course offerings in Psychology during the 2011/2012 academic year.

Additionally, regardless of instructional platform, Psychology 101 courses generally fill to capacity, and it is rarely observed that any of the Psychology course offerings are cancelled due to low enrollments.

Moreover, of the 45 Psychology courses offered during the Fall and Spring semesters of the 2011/2012 academic year, 20 are scheduled to be taught by full-time faculty members. This translates into 56% of psychology courses being taught by part-time faculty. When comparing the need for adding full-time faculty to the Psychology discipline to other areas of the campus, the data based argument that Psychology has access to a highly qualified part-time faculty pool has been asserted as a reason to assign new full-time faculty positions to other disciplines and/or areas within TMCC that does not have the luxury of access to a highly qualified part-time pool. Although this may be a valid argument, this does not detract from the high percentage of Psychology courses offered by parttime faculty, nor weaken the argument that having a greater percentage of courses within the discipline taught by full-time faculty would strengthen the curricula.

Currently, the Psychology discipline is effectively meeting its mission of offering a variety of courses addressing the TMCC missions of transfer education, general education for TMCC AAS candidates, and the lifelong learning interests of members of our community.

6 Curriculum | Truckee Meadows Community College

DEMOGRAPHICS AND ENROLLMENT

General Student Demographics

Age

2 -year Average Headcount

Psychology TMCC

66%

54%

Psychology 2011-12

22%

25%

11%

13%

0%

2%

Under 18 yrs.

1%

6%

50+ yrs.

18-24 yrs.

25-34 yrs.

35-49 yrs.

Fall 09

Spr 10

Fall 10

Spr 11

%

N

%

Psych. Avg %

TMCC Avg %

N

%

N

%

N

Under 18 yrs.

18-24 yrs.

25-34 yrs.

35-49 yrs.

0 36 6 6

0% 75% 13% 13%

0

0%

1

0%

1

0%

<1%

2%

65

63%

171

68%

171

62%

66%

54%

22

21%

48

19%

70

26%

22%

25%

14

14%

26

10%

29

11%

11%

13%

50+ yrs.

0

0%

2

2%

5

2%

3

1%

1%

6%

Total

48

100%

103

100%

251

100%

274

100%

100%

100%

The number of students enrolled in Psychology courses who declare Psychology as their academic major grew to

274 in Spring of 2011 after the new emphasis was implemented in Fall of 2009. Improvement in enrollment occurred for each semester-to-semester studied. The group of students 18-24 years old is the main group that enrolled in Psychology for the period. Increase in enrollment in this age group increased 475%. Psychology majors reveal age demographics significantly younger than TMCC as a whole. This may reflect that more students enrolled in Psychology are doing so to fulfill the baccalaureate requirements for transfer as opposed to taking the courses for personal interest. Almost half of this difference is offset by the lower 50+ year olds. All age groups, however, showed highly significant increases in enrollment.

School of Liberal Arts | Demographics and Enrollment 7

Gender

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

2-year Average Headcount

Psychology TMCC

71%

56%

44%

29%

15

17

Female Male Total

Fall 09

Spr 10

Fall 10

Spr 11

N

%

Psych. Avg %

TMCC Avg %

N

%

N

%

N

%

35

73%

73

71%

179

71%

196

72%

71%

56%

13

27%

30

29%

72

29%

78

28%

29%

44%

48

100%

103

100%

251

100%

274

100%

100%

100%

As illustrated in the above graph, female enrollment outnumbers male enrollment for Psychology majors, as well as the college as a whole. These ratios held steady during the duration of the period studied, varying just 1percentage point from the averages. The difference is more pronounced when comparing males to the college demographic.

8 Demographics and Enrollment | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12

Ethnicity

2-year Average Headcount

Psychology TMCC

61%

67%

4% 3%

African

American

4% 5%

Asian

16%

18%

0% 1% 3% 2%

Hawaiian or

Pacific

Islander

Hispanic Native

American

0%

3%

0% 1%

12%

1%

White Two or more races

International

Students

Unreported

Fall N

09 %

Spr N

10 %

African

American Asian

1

2%

4

4%

4

8%

4

4%

Hawaiian or Pacific

Islander Hispanic

7

15%

16

16%

Native

American White

0

0%

2

2%

34

71%

70

68%

Two or more races

International

S tudents

0

0%

0

0%

Unreported Total

2

4%

7

7%

48

100%

103

100%

Fall N

10 %

Spr N

11 %

Psych. Avg

TMCC Avg

11

4%

9

3%

4%

3%

10

4%

8

3%

4%

5%

0

0%

0

0%

<1%

1%

44

18%

43

16%

16%

18%

7

3%

8

3%

3%

2%

163

65%

146

53%

61%

67%

0

0%

0

0%

<1%

3%

1

0%

0

0%

<1%

1%

15

6%

60

22%

12%

1%

251

100%

274

100%

100%

100%

Note: Ethnicity categories were changed in Fall 2009 to align with new IPEDS and NSHE reporting requirements

Similar to the college as a whole, the “white” enrollment headcount far exceeds the numbers found in other ethnicities. Psychology also shows consistency with the other ethnicities found in the college as a whole. The exception to this ethnic consistency is found in those remaining “Unreported.” Psychology contains 12% of unreported ethnicities compare to just 1% in the college. During the period under study, the number of unreported students climbed from 2 to 60.

School of Liberal Arts | Demographics and Enrollment 9

2011-12

Student Status

Educational Goals

PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

5-year Average Headcount

PSY TMCC

86%

75%

6%

12%

3%

5%

0%

2%

Earn a Degree Earn a Certificate Improve Job Skills Personal

Enrichment

2% 3%

Transfer

2%

3%

Undecided

Fall 06

Spr 07

Fall 07

Spr 08

Fall 08

Spr 09

Fall 09

Spr 10

Fall 10

Spr 11

%

N

%

N

%

PSY Avg %

TMCC Avg %

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

N

%

N

N

%

N

%

Earn a

Degree

886

82%

843

83%

930

83%

946

83%

1,079

85%

1,032

84%

1,201

86%

1,348

Earn a

Certificate

34

3%

32

3%

41

4%

30

3%

30

2%

46

4%

41

3%

35

86%

1,379

94%

1,386

92%

86%

75%

2%

26

2%

40

3%

3%

5%

Improve

Job Skills

7

1%

3

0%

6

1%

9

1%

Personal

Enrichment

92

8%

85

8%

76

7%

57

6%

1

0%

6

0%

3

0%

0

108

8%

102

8%

110

8%

126

0%

2

0%

0

0%

0%

2%

8%

35

2%

40

3%

6%

12%

Transfer Undecided

2%

27

2%

35

2%

2%

3%

34

3%

23

2%

26

2%

27

39

3%

39

3%

19

2%

18

2%

2%

2

0%

1

0%

2%

3%

21

2%

20

2%

18

1%

25

23

2%

28

2%

54

5%

62

6%

Total

1,273

100%

1,229

100%

1,399

100%

1,561

1,082

100%

1,019

100%

1,125

100%

1,133

100%

100%

1,471

100%

1,502

100%

100%

100%

More students have declared a degree emphasis in Psychology as their educational goal and this has been a growing trend over the five years covered. Fewer students declare personal enrichment for a goal in psychology classes and this was the case for all 5 years. The enrichment numbers peaked in Spring of 2010 and then plummeted to 3% in 2010-11.

10 Demographics and Enrollment | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12

Educational Status

2-year Average Headcount

Psychology TMCC

67%

77%

24%

9% 10%

13%

Continuing Students New Transfers New Students

Fall 09

Spr 10

Fall 10

Spr 11

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Psych. Avg %

TMCC Avg %

Continuing Students

26

54%

61

59%

124

49%

239

87%

67%

77%

New Transfers

7

15%

18

17%

25

10%

13

5%

9%

10%

New Students

15

31%

24

23%

102

41%

22

8%

24%

13%

Total

48

100%

103

100%

251

100%

274

100%

100%

100%

Psychology has fewer continuing students and more new students than TMCC as a whole. New transfer students parallel the whole college.

School of Liberal Arts | Demographics and Enrollment 11

2011-12

Enrollment Status

PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

2-year Average Headcount

Psychology TMCC

47%

30%

29%

25%

24%

20%

17%

8%

12+ 9-11.9 6-8.9

Less than 6 credits

Fall 09

Spr 10

Fall 10

Spr 11

%

N

%

Psych. Avg %

TMCC Avg %

N

%

N

%

N

12+

30

63%

52

50%

128

51%

111

41%

47%

30%

Credits Earned

9-11.9 6-8.9

9

19%

11

11%

50

20%

63

23%

20%

17%

9

19%

27

26%

58

23%

75

27%

25%

24%

Less than 6

0

0%

13

13%

15

6%

25

9%

8%

29%

Total

48

100%

103

100%

251

100%

274

100%

100%

100%

Psychology majors taking 12+ credits per semester is significantly higher than the college as a whole. In addition, there are far fewer majors taking less than 6 credits. This finding is consistent with the number of all students taking credits at all workloads increasing rapidly over the last four semesters. For instance, full-time student majors grew from 30 students to 111 students over those four semesters.

Student Recruitment Activities

Psychology faculty participate in each “Welcome Back Faire” held in the student center. It should be noted that the student needs for Psychology curricula exceeds the ability of the department to offer classes, in particular for

Psychology 101. To date, given the high interest/enrollment patterns in our university transfer courses, actively recruiting students for Psychology courses has not been necessary.

Underserved Student Populations

There is no formal process by which the Psychology discipline is actively recruiting underserved populations, although faculty do participate in student information and recruitment activities as requested. The Psychology discipline is ethnically diverse in comparison to the College, but this is not due to active recruitment efforts.

12 Demographics and Enrollment | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12

Enrollment Patterns

Number of Sections

Number of Sections: Fall Semesters

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

38

36

40

44 44

Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 09

Number of Sections: Spring Semesters

Fall 10

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

38

37

39

48

46

Spr 07 Spr 08 Spr 09 Spr 10 Spr 11

Academic Years

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

PSY (5 yr Avg)

SOLA (5 yr Avg)

40

710

TMCC (5 yr Avg)

*SOLA = School of Liberal Arts

1629

Fall

38

36

40

44

44

% Change Spring

-38

-5%

11%

37

39

10%

0%

48

46

4%

1%

0%

42

717

1623

% Change

--

-3%

5%

23%

-4%

5%

1%

0%

The above graphs show the changing number of sections offered in all psychology classes from Fall to Fall and

Spring to Spring. While the number of students taking psychology coursework has increased each semester (see full-time equivalent enrollment), our number of sections available for students has been less consistent. In the Fall of 06, TMCC offered 38 sections of psychology coursework, then cut back 2 sections to 36 sections in the Fall 07.

School of Liberal Arts | Demographics and Enrollment 13

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

Fall 08 saw an increase of 4 sections from the previous fall to a total of 40. In Fall 09 and Fall 10 there were an additional 4 sections added with a total of 44 sections offered in each. Spring sections followed this mixed growth pattern, with 38 sections available in Spring 07 and a slight cut back to 37 sections in Spring 08. An additional 2 sections were added in Spring 09 bringing the total to 39. Spring 10 saw the most dramatic change and increase in sections for fall or spring, with an increase of 9 sections from Spring 09 to Spring 10 (a 23% increase).

Spring 10 ended with a slight downturn from the high of 48 in Spring 10 to 46 sections. While the number of sections offered to students varied from year to year and semester to semester, the five year average growth in psychology sections was 4%. This increase outpaced both the Division (SOLA) which increased its sections by 1% and the college as a whole, which did not grow in offered sections.

14 Demographics and Enrollment | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12

Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment

FTE: Fall Semesters

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

227

236

267

292

311

Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 09 Fall 10

FTE: Spring Semesters

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

215

239

260

328

316

Spr 07 Spr 08 Spr 09 Spr 10 Spr 11

Academic Years

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

PSY (5 yr Avg)

SOLA (5 yr Avg)

267

3260

TMCC (5 yr Avg)

*SOLA = School of Liberal Arts

6809

Fall

227

236

267

292

311

% Change

--

4%

13%

9%

7%

8%

6%

4%

Spring

215

239

260

328

316

271

3168

6692

% Change

--

11%

9%

26%

-4%

11%

7%

4%

The above graphs show the number of FTE students enrolled in psychology coursework from Fall to Fall and

Spring to Spring. Except for Spring 2011, Fall to Fall growth and Spring to Spring growth has been continuous.

Fall FTE began at 227 in Fall 06 and increased each Fall ending with 311 FTE in Fall 10. Spring FTE also increased continuously from Spring 07 with an FTE of 215, through Spring 10 with 328. Spring 11 FTE did fall, however, to 316. Psychology FTE grew faster in both Fall and Spring than SOLA or TMCC. The five year

School of Liberal Arts | Demographics and Enrollment 15

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW average Fall FTE growth for psychology was 8%, SOLA 6%, and TMCC 4%. Spring FTE growth was even more dramatic, with a five year average of 11% in comparison to SOLA, 7% and TMCC 4%.

Retention Rates

Fall 2010 Retention Rates

PSY SOSC TMCC

76%

72%

70%

Retention Rate

Term

Fall 06

Spr 07

Fall 07

Spr 08

Fall 08

Spr 09

Fall 09

Spr 10

Fall 10

Spring 11

Total Enrollments

PSY (5 year Avg)

SOLA Fall 10

TMCC Fall 10

*SOLA = School of Liberal Arts

1,130

1,068

1,179

1,189

1,329

1,292

1,453

1,630

1,545

1,569

1,338

18,213

36,505

Number Retained

776

687

800

784

933

929

957

1,115

1,078

1,038

910

13,787

26,346

Retention Rate

69%

64%

68%

66%

70%

72%

66%

68%

70%

66%

68%

76%

72%

The above chart outlines the retention rates of enrolled psychology students from Fall 06 until Spring 11. During this cycle, retention rates in psychology have varied from a low of 64% in Spring 07 to a high of 72% in Spring 09.

When comparing the average five year retention rates of students enrolled in psychology coursework to the

Division and TMCC, we see that psychology retains 68%, the division 72%, and TMCC 76%.

16 Demographics and Enrollment | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology

Student to Faculty Ratios

Student to Faculty Ratio: Fall Semesters

2011-12

46.0

41.0

36.0

31.0

26.0

21.0

16.0

11.0

6.0

1.0

30.2

32.8

33.2

32.9

35.1

Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 09 Fall 10

Student to Faculty Ratio: Spring Semesters

46.0

41.0

36.0

31.0

26.0

21.0

16.0

11.0

6.0

1.0

28.1

32.0

33.0

33.9

34.1

Spr 07 Spr 08 Spr 09 Spr 10 Spr 11

Academic Years

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

PSY (5 yr Avg)

SOLA (5 yr Avg)

32.8

23.5

TMCC (5 yr Avg)

*SOLA = School of Liberal Arts

20.7

Fall

30.2

32.8

33.2

32.9

35.1

% Change

--

9%

1%

-1%

7%

4%

4%

4%

Spring

28.1

32.0

33.0

33.9

34.1

32.2

22.6

20.4

% Change

--

14%

3%

3%

0%

5%

5%

5%

The SFR at TMCC is calculated by taking the number of students enrolled and dividing by the number of sections offered. So SFR at TMCC is roughly the same as “average class size”. The above graph shows the relatively consistent increase in SFR Fall to Fall and Spring to Spring. SFR for Fall 06 was 30.2 and increased each semester except Fall 09 in which it fell from 33.2 (Fall 08) to 32.9. Fall SFR increased in Fall 10 again to 35.1. Spring SFR has steadily grown with a low of 28.1 in Spring 07 and a high of 34.1 in Spring 11. We can see that SFR in

School of Liberal Arts | Demographics and Enrollment 17

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW psychology has grown on an average 4% in Fall semesters and 5% in Spring semesters. The increase in five year average class size is matched by a 4% increase in Fall and 5% increase in Spring in both the division SOLA, and in the college as a whole.

Number of Declared Degree/Emphasis Seekers

In the Fall of 2009, TMCC offered our AA degree with an emphasis in psychology for the first time. Since then, over 676 students have declared this degree/emphasis.

Student Success Rates

Number of Students Earning a Degree

2009-2011

2

0

2009-10 2010-11

Year

2009-10

2010-11

# of Graduates

0

2

Acadplan

AA Psychology

Number of Declared Degree/Emphasis Seekers

Fall 2009 - Spring 2011

Number of Students

676

%

100%

# of Grads

2

The new major delivered its first graduates in Fall 11 with 2 students. Given how new the major is at TMCC it is unclear what this means in terms of future graduates in the AA with the emphasis in psychology.

Enrollment Development Strategies

Demographic Findings and Strategies

The TMCC catalog presented the Psychology Emphasis within the Associates of Arts degree for the first time in

2009. This may help explain the rapid increase in the number of Psychology-declared students since the

Psychology Emphasis was instituted. The fact that Psychology majors are younger than the college as a whole may be due to the nature of the field itself. Psychology is a field with graduate education as the main gateway to practice, although many other bachelor-level careers recruit Psychology, as well. Thus, the length of study required may account for students beginning the study of this field at earlier ages than other fields. The American

Psychological Association published, “The changing gender composition of psychology,” in which it reports the gender composition of the field rising from 20% female to 72%. This trend is evident in the TMCC Psychology

18 Demographics and Enrollment | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12 demographics, as well. Further study may be warranted to determine reasons for Psychology majors reporting

“Unreported” in greater numbers than is evident in the college as a whole.

Student Status Findings and Strategies

The combined major and non-major student enrollment in Psychology courses demonstrates the effect of the Core

Curriculum-Social Sciences requirement upon Psychology enrollments. The marked drop for enrolling for personal interest most likely reflects the severe economic conditions found in Nevada. The populace is more likely to seek employment qualifications in such times and to have fewer resources for personal enrichment, as well. The TMCC

Personal Enrichment data dropped from 5% to 4%. Since the Psychology Dept. dropped substantially more, the department may want to consider marketing the personal enrichment factor of studying Psychology.

The data revealing students continuing their educations in lower percentages than the college as a whole is probably explained by the higher percentage in new students. As the new major emphasis was discovered by more students over the period studied, the “New Students” category would naturally be higher statistically.

Enrollment Patterns and Strategies

Spring 2007

Full-time Part-

Spring 2008

Full-time Part-

Faculty and Staff FTE

Spring 2009

Full-time Part-

Spring 2010

Full-time Part-

Spring 2011

Full-time Parttime time time time time

25 90 33 79 21 97 39 106 66 73

Program

Psychology

Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall

Data

Sections

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

38 36 40 44 44

Student 227 236 267 292 311

The first chart entitled “Faculty and Staff FTE” compares Spring Full time Faculty FTE to Part-time FTE . The proportion varied greatly during the five year period, from 21% Full Time in Fall 07 and 09 to 90% Full Time in

Fall 2011. Spring 10 had 36% Full time FTE.

The second chart entitled shows growth of psychology sections and student FTE as well as retention rates from each Fall semester. From Fall 2008 until Fall 2010, Fall sections increased from 38 to 44 (15% increase in sections). At the same time, student FTE went from 227 in Fall 05 to 311 in Fall 2010 (37% increase in student

FTE). The chart also shows Retention rates vary with a low of 66% in Fall 08 to a high of 70% in Fall 2010.

Student Success Rates and Strategies

Ninety-three percent of all Psychology majors that list educational goals are pursuing a degree in Spring 2011.

Only 26 of these 274 majors, however, are reporting their educational goals. This would suggest a need for the department to intervene directly with its majors in order to stimulate more self-reports in this category.

Furthermore, 2% reported pursuing a certificate in the field, when no such certificate exists. The difference in the

“Personal Enrichment” category may reflect a non-degree nature of the category. Perhaps, most TMCC psychology students pursuing personal enrichment meet their enrichment needs without pursuing an entire degree.

The data revealing Psychology students continuing their educations in lower percentages than the college as a whole is probably explained by the higher percentage in new students. As the new major emphasis was discovered by more students over the period studied, the “New Students” category would naturally be higher statistically.

School of Liberal Arts | Demographics and Enrollment 19

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

RESOURCES

Faculty and Staff

Required Faculty Credentials

TMCC instructional mission is to hire the most qualified individuals for teaching positions. A master degree in the field of Psychology or closely related areas is the minimum requirement for faculty teaching Psychology courses.

To maintain academic excellence, every semester the coordinator scrutinizes TMCC’s Psychology pool to ensure that faculty members are capable of providing high quality instruction. Currently, the discipline of Psychology has

4 tenured full-time faculty members (one serving as Acting Dean of School of Liberal Arts); one full-time faculty under temporary, non-tenure track, annual contract; and 14 part-time faculty. The entire Psychology faculty consists of qualified instructors that possess required credentials. Forty-three percent of our part-time instructors have Psychology Ph.D. degrees, and 57% have Master in Arts or Science.

Name

John Coles

Kevin Dugan

Bob Fletcher

Paula Frioli-Peters

FTE

Degree(s), Certificates

List conferring institutions

1 Ph.D., Counseling,

Oregon State University

M.A., Counseling,

Arizona State University

B.S., Business Finance,

Arizona State University

1 Ph.D., Counseling

Psychology, University of

Nevada, Reno

M.A., Counseling

Psychology, CSU, Chico

B.A., Psychology, CSU,

Stanislaus

1 M.A., Counseling

Psychology California

State University, Chico

B.A., Philosophy

California State

University, Chico

1 Ph.D., Experimental

Psychology, University of

Sao Paulo – Brazil

M.S., Experimental

Psychology, University of

Sao Paulo – Brazil

B.S., Biological Sciences,

Sao Paulo State University

(UNESP) – Brazil

Professional Certification

List agency/organization

Nationally Certified

Counselor by The

National Board of

Certified Counselors

Licensed Psychologist –

Board of Psychology

Years at

TMCC

27

Total

Years

27

22 28

20 Resources | Truckee Meadows Community College

Armida Fruzzetti

Maria Teirumniks

Nicole Ballardini

Thomas Wade Brown

Karen Murphy Erikson

Valerie Fisher Haskin

.2 Ph.D., Clinical

Psychology, University of

Nevada, Reno

M.A., Psychology,

College of William and

Mary

B.S., Psychology, Radford

University

.2 Ph.D., Sociology, State

University of New York at

Albany

M.A., Sociology, Indiana

University

B.A., Economics, Indiana

University

.47 Ph.D., Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

M.A. Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

B.A. Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

.2 M.A., Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

B.A., Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

.4 Ph.D., Clinical

Psychology, University of

Nevada, Reno

M.A. Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

B.S. Psychology, Drake

University, Des Moines,

IA

.4 Ph.D., Psychology,

Claremont Graduate

University, Claremont,

CA

B.A., Psychology,

Swarthmore College,

Swarthmore, PA

Psychology 2011-12

School of Liberal Arts | Resources 21

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

Jennifer Rea Highsmith

Sheri Hixon

Cindy Lynn Owings

Carrie Paras

Dwight James Peterson

Janice R. Russell

Matthew Todd Sewell

22

.4 M.A., Psychology:

Cognitive and Brain

Sciences program

B.A., Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

.4 Ph.D., Clinical

Psychology, Saybrook

Graduate School, San

Francisco, CA

M.A., Clinical

Psychology, Saybrook

Graduate School, San

Francisco, CA

B.A., Psychology, Union

Institute and University,

Sacramento, CA

.4 M.A., Secondary School

Counseling, University of

Northern Colorado,

Greeley, CO

B.A., Theatre Arts,

University of Denver, CO

.4 Ph.D., Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

M.A. Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

B.A., Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

B.S., Biology, University of Nevada, Reno

.2 M.A., Psychology,

University of Northern

Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA

B.A., Psychology,

University of Northern

Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA

.4 M.S. Psychology, Western

Washington University,

Bellingham, WA

B.A. Psychology,

Whitman College, Walla

Walla, WA

.2 M.A., Clinical

Psychology, Northern

Arizona University,

Flagstaff, AZ

Nevada School

Counselors License

Teaching Strategies

Improvement, Nevada

Board of Education

Resources | Truckee Meadows Community College

19.5 22

Mirit Sloves

Gregory Scott Smith

Alicia Summers

.6 Ph.D., Clinical

Hypnotherapy, Pebble Hill

University

M.S., Counseling,

University of Phoenix

B.A., Hebrew literature –

Gratz College

.4 M.A., Psychology,

University of Nevada,

Reno

B.S., Psychology, Florida

State University,

Tallahassee, FL

.4 M.S., Counseling

Psychology, Radford

University, Radford, VA

B.S., Psychology, Radford

University, Radford, VA

Psychology 2011-12

School of Liberal Arts | Resources 23

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

Full-Time to Part-Time Faculty Ratio

Percentage of Credit Hours Taught by Part-time Faculty

Fall Semesters

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

77%

69%

83%

68%

Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 09

48%

Fall 10

Percentage of Credit Hours Taught by Part-time Faculty

Spring Semesters

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

78%

71%

82%

73%

53%

24

Spr 07 Spr 08 Spr 09

Academic Years

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

PSY (5 yr Avg)

SOLA (5 yr Avg)

69%

46%

TMCC (5 yr Avg)

*SOLA = School of Liberal Arts

48%

Fall

77%

69%

83%

68%

48%

% Change

--

-8%

13%

-14%

-20%

-7%

1%

1%

Spring

78%

71%

82%

73%

53%

71%

45%

47%

% Change

--

-8%

12%

-9%

-21%

-6%

0%

0%

These graphs show the percentage of credit hours taught by part-time faculty from Fall to Fall and from Spring to

Spring during the past five years. During Fall semester of 2006 part-time faculty was responsible for teaching 77% of credit hours in psychology courses, in Fall 2007 the percentage was 69%. During Fall semester of 2008 one full-time faculty was in sabbatical, thus part-time faculty was responsible for teaching 83% of the total credit hours. In Fall

2009 one part-time faculty was hired in a temporary, non-tenure track, annual full-time position and there was a decrease in the number of credit hours taught by part-time faculty – 68% of total credit hours. In Fall semester of 2010

Resources | Truckee Meadows Community College

Spr 10 Spr 11

Psychology 2011-12 the Psychology discipline hired a new full-time faculty, and then the percentage of credit hours taught by part-time faculty decreased to 48%.

During Spring semesters the percentage of credit hours taught by part-time faculty was 78% in 2007, 71% in 2008,

82% in 2009, 73% in 2010 and 53% in 2011.

During the past five years, on average, part-time faculty was responsible for teaching 69% of the total credit hours during Fall semesters, while this average was 46% for SOLA and 48% for TMCC as a whole. For Spring semesters the average of credit hours taught by part-time faculty was 71% for Psychology, but only 45% for SOLA and 47% for

TMCC.

Required Classified Credentials

High school degree is the minimum required to an Administrative Assistant at Social Sciences.

Classified FTE

The Social Sciences Department has one Administrative Assistant that works full time. The assistant is responsible to assist Anthropology, Education, Psychology, Sociology and Social Work. Psychology alone represents 2% of TMCC students, this may be a reason to assign a new assistant position to the discipline of Psychology.

Facilities

All psychology courses use smart classrooms. Lately , scheduling new courses, or adding sections has been difficult due to the lack of rooms in specific time slots. The TMCC Admissions and Records Office is working with the Social

Sciences Department to develop scheduling strategies to mitigate this problem.

Technology

As mentioned above all psychology courses use smart classrooms. There is a need to replace and maintain computers, projectors, and software in order to be able to provide high-level, quality education to our students. Associated with classroom technology the discipline offers several online sections, creating a high demand to the WebCollege.

Funding Sources

N/A

Resource Development Strategies

Staffing Issues and Strategies

The Social Sciences department has only one Administrative Assistant (FTE = 1) to take care of Anthropology,

Early Childhood Education, Child Care, Psychology, and Sociology. As discussed before, the number of students interested in psychology has had a steady increase since 2006, indicating a strong need for faculty (full-time, tenure track) and staff (Administrative Assistant) to meet this demand.

Facilities and Desired Capital Improvements

N/A

Funding Allocations and Development Strategies

N/A

School of Liberal Arts | Resources 25

Psychology 2011-12

APPENDIX A

Analysis of Funding Resources

Permanent Empolyee FTE (1)

2010

Account Expense Analysis Trend

Psychology

Actual

7.00

2011

7.00

Budget

2012

7.00

2013

-

Projected

2014

-

2015

-

Expense Type

Letters of Appointment

Salaries & Wages

Fringe Benefits

Operating Expense

Total Expenses

Student FTE (annual)

Expense/Student FTE

$ 115,886

368,207

105,497

9,760

$ 599,350

$ 231,410

611,872

170,577

11,928

$ 1,025,787

$ -

505,455

153,270

11,600

$ 670,325

$ -

-

-

-

$ -

310.00

$ 1,933

313.50

$ 3,272

-

$ -

-

-

-

$ -

-

$ -

-

-

-

$ -

-

Notes:

(1) Amounts shown are budget for the respective period.

The operating expense budget amount is not solely designated for Psychology it is a shared budget with the following disciplines; Anthropology, Sociology, Mental Health, CEP/EPY (Counseling, Ed. Psychology), and CPD (Counseling and Personal Development).

State-Supported Operating Budgets

As indicated above, the Psychology discipline has a shared budget within the Social Sciences department.

However, the majority of its funds go to making copies (i.e., syllabi, handouts, exams, quizzes) the remainder of the funds, which is a small amount, go to cover the expenses that the department needs (i.e., postage, long distance, instructional supplies, etc.) which is shared with the other five disciplines.

Lab Fees

N/A

Special Fees

N/A

Grants

N/A

Non-Credit Training Income

N/A

Donations

N/A

School of Liberal Arts | APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

Degree and Certificate Worksheets

Psychology 2011-12

School of Liberal Arts | APPENDIX B

Psychology 2011-12

APPENDIX C

Program, Discipline, and Course Assessment Reports

Description of Outcomes Assessment Methodologies and Progress to Date

The Psychology outcomes assessment and student learning outcomes assessment methodology, data collection and analysis, and application of results to curriculum development/teaching effectiveness is well under way. We have a clear schedule of student learning outcomes assessment for each class taught within the Psychology discipline (this schedule was presented in the Curriculum section of this report), the most poignant being the focus on Psychology 101, General Psychology, the class with the most enrollment in any given semester. For all classes other than Psychology 101, starting Fall 2011 semester, full- and part-time instructors have been instructed by the Dean of the School of Liberal Arts (SLOA) to conduct student learning outcomes assessments in each of their classes in accordance with the schedule listed on page three of this report, examining the student learning outcomes statements for each course as defined in the applicable Master Course Outline(s) which are on file with the College. These procedures are currently underway with summaries of these results to be submitted by February 15, 2012 for the data collected and analyzed during the Fall 2011 semester.

The more difficult student learning outcomes assessment task pertains to the operational definitions and methodologies for assessing student learning outcomes (SLOs) in the General Psychology curriculum

(e.g., Psychology 101) given the large overall enrollment in this class, the number of sections taught each semester (e.g., about 30 Psychology 101 sections in any given semester), and the many different faculty that teach this curriculum every term. This difficulty lies not only in establishing procedures that allow individual faculty members to conduct outcomes assessment procedures as s/he sees fit in any given class, but also to establish some uniform procedures of data collection, analysis, and application of results of the

Psychology 101 curriculum across instructors and semesters, allowing for a broader discipline-focus on

SLOs. In Fall 2010, Kevin Dugan, Psychology Professor within the Social Sciences Department at TMCC, proposed developing a SLOs method that can be used by all full- and part-time Psychology 101 instructors allowing for this broader data collection and analysis. This proposal was approved by the Dean of SOLA.

The following bulleted summary outlines the progress to date in developing and applying this broader SLOs Psychology 101 methodology: a.

The remainder of Fall 2010 semester was spent developing/refining the operational definitions of SLOs within Psychology 101 (based on and incorporating in part the definitions as discussed in the 2006 Psychology Discipline Review), b.

As a start, instruments were developed to be used in the assessment of two chapters of the

Psychology 101 course, Chapter 5 (Developing Through the Life Span) and Chapter 11

(Emotions, Stress and Health). Two different chapters within the Psychology 101 curriculum will be assessed every semester, culminating in a method that assesses SLOs in all content areas within Psychology 101 approximately every 3.5 years. c.

The methodology was developed that requires students to access and complete the two SLOs instruments for each of the two chapters via ANGEL (regardless of whether the class was lecture, online, or hybrid) with the goal of establishing uniform procedures across instructors and classes to control for test administration effects,

School of Liberal Arts | APPENDIX C

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW d.

A pilot data collection process was completed in Spring 2011 with the involvement at that time of only full-time Psychology faculty (Robert Fletcher, John Coles, Paula Frioli, Kevin Dugan).

The main goal was to use the pilot study as a “practice” effort to identify methodological flaws prior to involving all part-time faculty as well as full-time faculty during the Fall 2011 semester. e.

The first formal administration of this broader SLOs methodology is underway this Fall 2011 semester utilizing all Psychology 101 classes for all full- and part-time faculty, with the data summaries due to Kevin Dugan by February 15, 2012.

In addition, all Psychology faculty are being asked to provide a brief summary of any individualized/unique SLOs procedures they used in their individual classes, the data collected, findings, and applications of findings towards teaching effectiveness and/or curriculum development starting with

Fall 2012 semester. These reports are requested to be provided to Kevin Dugan by February 15, 2012.

Due to unanticipated flaws in the SLOs methodologies during the pilot study completed in Spring

2011, and inconsistent application of the procedure, these data were deemed to have limited validity and reliability. The involved faculty met and unanimously decided to use the Spring 2011 pilot study as intended; a medium to further revise and refine the SLOs method to be formally run the first time during

Fall 2011, which is currently underway. Specifically, the problems identified were as follows: inconsistent amount of time allowed for students to complete the instruments and inconsistent date parameters for students to access instruments.

Regarding the instruments themselves, each chapter in Psychology will be assessed by two online

ANGEL quizzes, one focusing on the conceptual understanding of course content, the other focusing on the application of course content. This methodology is in accordance with the approved SLOs statements on the Psychology 101 Master Course File. In fact, of the two instruments developed thus far, one is titled

“conceptual” and the other “application.” Conceptual instruments focus on a student’s abilities at defining and identifying concepts covered in any given chapter, while the application instrument, without providing conceptual definitions, asks students to apply a concept in any given chapter, such as choosing the correct answer in hypothetical examples provided. This dichotomous approach (e.g., conceptual and application) is modeled after the standards for undergraduate psychology curricula adopted by the American Psychological

Association (APA) in 2006.

On any given SLOs outcomes assessment instrument, each consisting of fifteen (15) separately administered multiple choice questions, students will be deemed to: a.

Exceed expectations if they earn 12 out of 15 points b.

Meet expectations of they earn 10 out of 15 points c.

Not meet expectations if they earn below 10 points

Moreover, quiz results will be run through an item analysis within ANGEL to compile data regarding overall student performance on any given question, each item representing a different concept, or different application of a concept, to assess for needed curricular and/or teaching effectiveness improvement.

Three other outcomes assessment procedures will be followed every semester across the Psychology curricula as well. First, all psychology students will be asked to complete a student satisfaction survey

(included at the end of this narrative) sometime within the last three to four weeks of the semester. These surveys will be administered and the results collected by the instructor of each class. Second, as stated on

32 Appendix C | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12 the Master Course Outline for Psychology 101, instructors will develop an assignment that requires students to demonstrate their abilities in evaluating research articles in Psychology. Third, the Institutional Research

Department at the University of Nevada, Reno will be asked to provide data regarding the student success of

TMCC students who transferred into the Psychology Department at UNR.

The Psychology Satisfaction Survey and an example of a research article review assignment/rubric are provided below.

Student Satisfaction Survey

The Psychology discipline is currently undergoing a self-study and your responses as students are extremely important. We appreciate the few minutes that it will take you to complete this survey. Your responses are anonymous and will be used so that we can learn how to better improve this discipline.

If you have any questions, please contact:

Kevin Dugan, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology 775-673-7283; kdugan@tmcc.edu

Thank you!

Psychology Discipline Survey

1.

How many Psychology courses have you taken at TMCC? ______

2.

Including this course, how many of the Psychology courses have been part of a requirement for your current field of study? _____

3.

Including this course, how would you rate all of the instructor’s knowledge of the course content?

Not at all Very little Somewhat Average Very knowledgeable

Extremely

0 1 2 3 4 5

4.

Including this course, were the courses you have taken so far relevant to your career goals?

Yes No

5.

How many times have you made an appointment with an advisor (either a TMCC advisor, or a

Psychology faculty)? _____

6.

Including this course, how would you rate your overall satisfaction with the Psychology courses you have taken?

Not at all satisfied

Very little Somewhat satisfied

0 1 2 3 4 5

School of Liberal Arts | APPENDIX C

2011-12 PROGRAM UNIT REVIEW

7.

Please rate your interest in pursuing a associates degree with an emphasis (major) in Psychology at

TMCC?

Not at all Very little Somewhat Average Very Extremely

0 1 2 3 4 5

8.

Please list any courses that you would like to see offered through the Psychology Discipline that you feel would be directly relevant to your field of study:

9.

Please list what you feel are the strengths of the Psychology courses you have taken so far:

10.

Please list what you feel are the weaknesses of the Psychology courses you have taken so far:

Example of Research Article Evaluation Assignment

Journal Article Review Paper

Psychology 101

Kevin Dugan, Ph.D.

DIRECTIONS: This assignment is to assist you in learning to evaluate psychological research and any information/conclusions presented by the research. This assignment will require you to find a journal article in Psychology. Our TMCC Library has many fine Psychology journals available both on-line in full-text, and in hard copy. Please choose an article that has personal and/or professional (or educational) meaning for you. Regardless of your interests, you can find research articles that will be meaningful in some fashion.

For assistance, please ask one of our reference librarians. They are very knowledgeable and love to help!

The article you choose has to be a data-based article. As discussed in class, research articles in Psychology typically have four components: introduction, method, results, and discussion. Usually, these components are entitled with these names in the text of the article. A research article will always involve the collection and analysis of data (e.g., numbers), and usually presents their results using tables and/or graphs in addition to the narrative.

If you have any doubt about whether the article you choose is a data-based, research article, please bring it to class before writing your paper. I’ll be happy to evaluate your article on the spot, and doing so will help your student colleagues evaluate their own choices as well.

After you have chosen a suitable research article in Psychology, please write a paper addressing the following:

34 Appendix C | Truckee Meadows Community College

Psychology 2011-12

1) What is/are the research questions of the study? You typically find this information in the last paragraph of the introduction.

2) What type of research method was used (e.g., case study, naturalistic observation, survey, correlation, experiment)? How do you know?

3) Remembering back to the more common problems with psychological research, what problems can you see in this study? (Common problems: sampling bias, experimenter bias, validity, reliability, generalizability) Why do you think these problems exist in your study?

4) Who were the subjects (participants) that constituted the sample in the study? Gender, age, ethnicity, number of subjects, etc.? How would this influence the generalizability of the results to the populations of interest? Why?

5) What conclusions did the authors draw from the results of the study? Give your opinion about the authors’ assertions. What do you agree with, not agree with? What is useful, or not useful?

And most important, WHY?

Grading: This paper is worth 50 points. Grading will be broken down as follows: a) 25 points: Quality of answers to items 1 through 4 above. b) 15 points: Writing Quality. c) 10 points: Quality of answer to #5 above.

Total point value of assignment = 50 points.

DUE DATE: Consult your syllabus or student calendar within ANGEL for the specific due date

Any questions, please ask in class, come by my office hours in Sierra 203J, email me at kdugan@tmcc.edu, or call me at 673-7283.

Happy researching!!!

School of Liberal Arts | APPENDIX C

Download