Document 14710905

advertisement
Table 1. Number and Percent of Women Faculty in Science by Department, 2002-2003
Division/Department
Natural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Science
Mathematics and Statistics
Physics and Astronomy
All Natural Sciences
Women
7
5
3
4
1
20
Men
11
13
7
13
9
53
Total % Women
18
39
18
28
10
30
17
24
10
10
73
27
Social Sciences
Anthropology
Economics
Geography
Political Science
Psychology
Sociology
All Social Sciences
Women
5
4
6
5
13
6
39
Men
11
11
6
8
13
11
60
Total % Women
16
31
15
27
12
50
13
38
26
50
17
35
99
39
59
113
All Faculty
172
34
Note: These tables were created using data retrieved from the City University Personnel System
(CUPS) database by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources on 20
April 2004. The data include all promotions and hires through 20 April 2004. Only full-time tenured
or tenure-track faculty who were employed at Hunter 01 July 2002 - 30 June 2003 were included in
the analyses. Distinguished Professors were added to the Full Professor category for analysis.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 2. Number and Percent of Women Faculty in Science by Rank and Department,
2002-2003
Division/Department
Women
Associate
3
1
0
1
1
6
Natural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Science
Mathematics and Statistics
Physics and Astronomy
All Natural Sciences
Assistant
0
1
0
0
0
1
Social Sciences
Anthropology
Economics
Geography
Political Science
Psychology
Sociology
All Social Sciences
Women
Assistant Associate
2
1
2
0
5
1
1
2
1
6
1
2
12
12
All Faculty
13
18
Full
4
3
3
3
0
13
Full
2
2
0
2
6
3
15
28
Assistant
2
3
3
1
0
9
Men
Associate
3
1
2
4
2
12
Men
Assistant Associate
1
2
4
2
2
1
0
4
5
2
1
4
13
15
22
27
Note: These tables were created using data retrieved from the City University Personnel System
(CUPS) database by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources on 20
April 2004. The data include all promotions and hires through 20 April 2004. Only full-time
tenured or tenure-track faculty who were employed at Hunter 01 July 2002 - 30 June 2003 were
included in the analyses. Distinguished Professors were added to the Full Professor category for
analysis.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Full
% Women
Associate
50
50
0
20
33
33
6
9
2
8
7
32
Assistant
0
25
0
0
N/A
10
8
5
3
4
6
6
32
% Women
Assistant Associate
67
33
33
0
71
50
100
33
17
75
50
33
48
44
Full
64
37
40
Full
40
25
60
27
0
29
Full
20
29
0
33
50
33
32
30
Table 3a. Tenure Outcomes by Sex, 2002-2003
Division/Department
Women
Men
# Considered # Approved % Approved # Considered # Approved % Approved
0
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
2
2
100
4
4
100
Total
2
2
100
4
4
100
Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Note: These tables include data from Tenure and Promotion Ballots provided by Judi Bubnell in Hunter
College's Provost's Office on 18 March 2004. Tenure decisions were voted on in November 2002. Tenure
decisions were effective on 01 September 2003.
Table 3b. Promotion Outcomes by Sex, 2002-2003
Division/Department
Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Women
Men
# Considered # Approved % Approved # Considered # Approved % Approved
0
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
1
1
100
Total
0
N/A
N/A
1
1
100
Note: These tables include data from Tenure and Promotion Ballots provided by Judi Bubnell in Hunter
College's Provost's Office on 18 March 2004. Promotion decisions were voted on in May and November
2002. Promotion decisions were effective on 01 January 2003.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 4. Median Years in Rank by Sex, 2002-2003
Degree Year
<= 1964
1965-1969
1970-1974
1975-1979
All Hunter
1980-1984
Sciences
1985-1989
1990-1994
1995-1999
2000-2004
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
(s.d.)
N (Current)
Assistant
8.0
2.2
3 (0)
4.3
8.8
3 (0)
4.3
0.5
5 (0)
4.9
1.3
12 (0)
5.3
0.7
5 (0)
4.3
1.4
3 (1)
4.3
1.6
6 (1)
2.8
1.4
9 (8)
1.8
1.4
2 (2)
Women
Associate
12.4
10.1
4 (1)
13.8
8.5
3 (1)
13.7
12.2
6 (3)
10.0
5.5
15 (3)
6.7
4.7
6 (2)
6.2
4.1
4 (3)
4.5
0.7
5 (4)
2.5
N/A
1 (1)
Full
Assistant
24.5
4.9
5.8
1.0
3 (3)
4 (0)
12.0
4.3
9.2
2.1
2 (2)
13 (0)
16.0
4.3
3.2
6.2
6 (6)
17 (2)
8.5
4.3
5.3
1.8
11 (11)
11 (0)
9.5
5.0
1.8
1.7
5 (5)
5 (0)
1.5
4.1
N/A
3.5
1 (1)
6 (4)
4.3
2.2
9 (2)
2.8
1.3
12 (10)
1.8
0.6
3 (3)
Men
Associate
9.0
8.5
5 (0)
7.5
8.6
14 (1)
8.0
7.1
15 (2)
7.2
6.5
16 (6)
6.2
4.7
8 (3)
6.0
2.7
11 (5)
3.5
2.6
8 (8)
1.5
N/A
2 (2)
Full
26.5
8.9
8 (8)
20.5
7.2
15 (15)
16.2
4.7
17 (17)
13.5
3.7
12 (12)
7.5
2.4
7 (6)
4.0
1.6
10 (5)
Note: These tables were created using data retrieved from the City University Personnel System
(CUPS) database by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources on 20
April 2004. The data include all promotions and hires through 20 April 2004. Only full-time
tenured or tenure-track faculty who were employed at Hunter 01 July 2002 - 30 June 2003 were
included in the analyses. Distinguished Professors were added to the Full Professor category for
analysis.
Note: Median years in rank includes the time spent in rank for all current faculty as of 30 June
2003. N indicates the number of 2002-2003 science faculty members from that degree range who
have ever held that particular rank. (Current) indicates the number of faculty members in that
rank on 30 June 2003.
Example: A female Assistant Professor who finished her degree in 1992, was hired 1 September
1992, and promoted to Associate Professor on 1 January 1998, would be represented in both the
Assistant and Associate columns for women in degree year 1990-1994. She would be represented
in () for her current rank of Associate Professor only. Her full 5.3 years as an Assistant contribute
to the median of 4.3 and the 5.5 years she has currently been an Associate contribute to the
median of 4.5.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 4a. Median Years in Rank by Sex and Division, 2002-2003
Degree Year
Median
<= 1969 (s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
Natural
1970-1979 (s.d.)
Sciences
N (Current)
Median
1980-1989 (s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
<= 1969 (s.d.)
N (Current)
Median
Social
1970-1979 (s.d.)
Sciences
N (Current)
Median
1980-1989 (s.d.)
N (Current)
Women
Assistant Associate
8
13.9
6.0
9.2
5 (0)
6 (2)
4.3
8.2
0.3
4.7
5 (0)
6 (1)
4.3
5.0
0.0
1.5
2 (0)
5 (2)
3.3
11.0
N/A
N/A
1 (0)
1 (0)
5.3
11.0
1.4
8.8
10 (0)
15 (2)
5.3
12.5
1.6
4.2
5 (1)
5 (3)
Men
Full
Assistant Associate
19.5
4.3
5.0
9.2
0.8
10.5
4 (4)
10 (0)
11 (1)
7.5
4.3
12.0
3.1
6.6
7.2
5 (5)
13 (2)
16 (4)
8.7
3.9
5.5
4.1
1.0
4.9
4 (4)
7 (0)
8 (4)
18.5
5.0
8.0
N/A
2.7
3.3
1 (1)
7 (0)
8 (0)
14.7
4.3
7.0
6.3
2.3
6.1
12 (12)
13 (0)
15 (2)
9.5
5.3
6.5
2.8
3.4
2.5
2 (2)
10 (4)
11 (4)
Full
20.4
8.5
13 (13)
13.5
4.4
14 (14)
6.5
4.1
4 (4)
22.5
6.8
10 (10)
14.8
4.8
15 (15)
5.5
1.9
7 (7)
Note: These tables were created using data retrieved from the City University Personnel System
(CUPS) database by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources on 20
April 2004. The data include all promotions and hires through 20 April 2004. Only full-time
tenured or tenure-track faculty who were employed at Hunter 01 July 2002 - 30 June 2003 were
included in the analyses. Distinguished Professors were added to the Full Professor category for
analysis.
Note: Median years in rank includes the time spent in rank for all current faculty as of 30 June
2003. N indicates the number of 2002-2003 science faculty members from that degree range who
have ever held that particular rank. (Current) indicates the number of faculty members in that
rank on 30 June 2003.
Example: A female Assistant Professor in the Social Sciences who finished her degree in 1982,
was hired 1 September 1982, and promoted to Associate Professor on 1 January 1988, would be
represented in both the Assistant and Associate columns for women in degree year 1980-1989.
She would be represented in () for her current rank of Associate Professor only. Her full 5.3 years
as an Assistant contribute to the median of 5.3 and the 15.5 years she has currently been an
Associate contribute to the median of 12.5.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 5a. Time at Institution (Median Number of Years) by Sex and Rank, 2002-2003
Division/Department
Natural Sciences (years)
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Science
Mathematics and Statistics
Physics and Astronomy
All Natural Sciences
Social Sciences (years)
Anthropology
Economics
Geography
Political Science
Psychology
Sociology
All Social Sciences
All Faculty
Women
Assistant Associate
N/A
5.4
2.8
11.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
38.8
N/A
32.8
2.8
10.1
Men
Full
Assistant Associate
24.1
3.7
12.8
18.8
1.8
7.4
21.8
2.8
12.8
23.8
1.8
25.8
N/A
N/A
19.8
21.8
2.8
17.8
Women's Median as a % of Men's
Full
Assistant Associate
Full
28.8
N/A
42
84
29.3
156
154
64
21.9
N/A
N/A
100
31.3
N/A
150
76
17.1
N/A
166
N/A
26.3
100
57
83
Assistant
0.8
2.3
2.8
3.8
N/A
1.8
1.8
Women
Associate
20.8
N/A
7.8
15.3
16.8
27.8
20.3
Men
Associate
7.3
4.3
12.8
10.3
25.8
17.8
9.3
Full
24.3
13.8
15.4
35.8
33.1
23.3
22.8
Women's Median as a % of Men's
Assistant Associate
Full
44
285
100
82
N/A
136
68
61
N/A
N/A
149
51
N/A
65
76
29
156
106
64
218
91
2.3
16.8
12.8
24.8
Full
Assistant
24.3
1.8
18.8
2.8
N/A
4.1
18.4
N/A
25.3
2.3
24.8
6.3
20.8
2.8
21.8
2.8
Note: Time at Institution takes into account all tenure-line years worked at Hunter College for each professor as
of 30 June 2003. (Some faculty members began working at Hunter College as adjuncts or substitutes before
being hired in a tenure-track position. This time is not included in our calculations.) These data were reported
by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources and retrieved from the CUPS database.
Example: A female Assistant Professor hired 1 September 1992 and promoted to Associate Professor on 1
January 1998 would be represented in the women Associate column with a total Time at Institution of 10.8 years.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
82
131
88
Table 5b. Attrition by Sex, 2002-2003
Division
Natural Science
Social Science
Total
Women
1
3
4
Leaving Faculty
% Women
Men
Total
4
5
20
2
5
60
6
10
40
Note: This table represents the number of faculty who have left in this academic year (01 July
2002 - 30 June 2003) and includes those who retired or resigned. Martin Fenton in Hunter
College's Department of Human Resources reported this information on 04 May 2004.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 6a. Number of Women in Science Who are in Non-Tenure-Track Positions by
Department, 2002-2003
Division/Department
Natural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Science
Mathematics and Statistics
Physics and Astronomy
All Natural Science
Women
Social Sciences
Anthropology
Economics
Geography
Political Science
Psychology
Sociology
All Social Sciences
Women
All Faculty
Men
9
2
2
10
2
25
14
9
3
18
3
47
Men
% Women
Total
23
39
11
18
5
40
28
36
5
40
72
35
Total
% Women
3
8
9
1
1
5
27
4
14
9
6
11
6
50
7
22
18
7
12
11
77
43
36
50
14
8
45
35
52
97
149
35
Note: These tables were created using data retrieved from the City University Personnel System
(CUPS) database by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources on 22
April 2004. The data include all promotions and hires through 22 April 2004. Only faculty with
appointment dates prior to 30 June 2003 were included in the analyses. These tables include nontenure track faculty -- both full and part-time. Non-tenure track faculty consist of Lecturers,
Research Associates, Substitute Professors, and Adjunct Professors.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 6b. Number of Women in Science Who are in Non-Tenure-Track
Positions by Sex and Rank, 2002-2003
Division/Department
Natural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Science
Mathematics and Statistics
Physics and Astronomy
All Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Anthropology
Economics
Geography
Political Science
Psychology
Sociology
All Social Sciences
All Faculty
Women
Lecturer R Assoc Sub
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
Lecturer
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Women
R Assoc Sub
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
3
Adj
7
2
2
9
2
22
Adj
Men
Lecturer R Assoc Sub
0
1
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
0
% Women
Adj Lecturer R Assoc Sub
13
N/A
0
100
5
N/A
0
N/A
2
0
N/A
N/A
18
100
N/A
N/A
3
N/A
N/A
N/A
41
50
0
100
Adj
35
29
50
33
40
35
Men
R Assoc Sub
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
3
%Women
R Assoc Sub
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
50
0
25
Adj
43
38
56
17
8
44
37
3
8
9
1
1
4
26
Lecturer
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
48
2
6
3
Note: These tables were created using data retrieved from the City University
Personnel System (CUPS) database by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's
Department of Human Resources on 22 April 2004. The data include all
promotions and hires through 22 April 2004. Only faculty with appointment dates
prior to 30 June 2003 were included in the analyses. These tables include nontenure track faculty -- both full and part-time.
Note: R Assoc means Research Associate; Sub means Substitute and consists
of all levels of substitute faculty including full, associate, assistant, and lecturer;
Adj means Adjunct and consists of all levels of substitute faculty including full,
associate, assistant, and lecturer.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Adj
4
13
7
5
11
5
45
Lecturer
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
86
33
0
50
36
Table 7. Number and Percent of Women Scientists in Administrative Positions, 2002-2003
Division
Women
Natural Science
Social Science
Total
4
2
6
Women
Natural Science
Social Science
Total
0
0
0
Department Chairs
% Women
Men
Total
1
4
5
5
6
11
80
33
55
Central Administrators
% Women
Men
Total
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
N/A
0
Women
Men
1
1
2
Women
0
0
0
% Women
1
1
2
Center Directors
Men
Total
0
1
1
Note: The department chairs were found on the Hunter College web site.
Note: Only deans or associate deans in the sciences are included on this table. Vita Rabinowitz
and Virginia Valian, the GEP Co-directors, and Judi Bubnell in Hunter College's Provost's Office
provided information about the deans.
Note: The Hunter web site, Judi Bubnell, Vita Rabinowitz, and Virginia Valian provided information
about the Hunter central administration. Administrators at Hunter do not hold faculty positions while
in administrative ranks. These tables represent those administrators whose backgrounds are in the
sciences (e.g., one administrator holds a JD and has not been a faculty member; this person was
not included in the table above).
Note: Judi Bubnell provided information about center directors on 8 April 2004. Only center
directors that are also Hunter science faculty are included on these tables (e.g., Director of Center
XXX is a Full Professor in Biology).
Gender Equity Project
Deans
Total
Hunter College
2
2
4
100
100
100
% Women
2
3
5
0
33
20
Table 8. Number of Women Science Faculty in Endowed/Named Chairs, 2002-2003
Distinguished Professors
Natural Science
Social Science
Total
Named Chairs or
Professorships
Natural Science
Social Science
Total
Women
Men
2
2
4
Women
1
0
1
Total
0
1
1
Men
% Women
2
3
5
Total
1
0
1
100
67
80
% Women
2
0
2
50
N/A
50
Source: Salute to scholars: The faculty of the City University of New York . This is a publication of
the Office of Academic Affairs and the Office of University Relations of CUNY.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 9. Number and Percent of Women Science Faculty on Promotion and Tenure Committees,
2002-2003
Faculty P & B
Members
Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Committee Members (total)
Department P & B
Members
Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Committee Members (total)
Alternates
Natural Sciences
Social Sciences
Alternates (total)
Women
Men
4
4
8
Women
1
4
5
Men
9
13
22
Women
0
1
1
Total
% Women
5
8
13
Total
16
17
33
Men
% Women
25
30
55
Total
0
4
4
80
50
62
36
43
40
% Women
0
5
5
N/A
20
20
Note: Information about Department Personnel and Budget (P&B) members provided to the GEP by
each science department.
Note: DP&B committees consist of the elected chair and four elected members.
Note: The FP&B committee includes department chairs, the deans, the provost, the directors of the
school of nursing and health sciences, and the college president. Only those faculty members or
administrators in the 11 Hunter sciences are included here.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 10a. Salary of Science Faculty, 2002-2003 (Controlling for Sex, Years
since degree, Time in current rank, Rank, and Department)
Descriptive Statistics
Salary as of 04/20/04
Sex (Female =1; Male = 0)
Years since degree (centered)
Time in current rank in years as of
04/20/04 (centered)
Rank (Asst Prof = 0; Assoc Prof = 1;
Prof =1)
Department (Nat Sci = 1; Soc Sci = 0)
Std.
Mean
Deviation
$81,744.01 $14,427.46
N
170
0.34
-0.029
0.476
11.3976
170
170
0.049
8.5589
170
0.79
0.406
170
0.42
0.496
170
Model Summary (b)
Adjusted Std. Error of
R
R Square R Square the Estimate
.798(a)
0.638
0.626
$8,817.80
1
a. Predictors: (Constant), Department (Nat Sci = 1; Soc Sci = 0), Time in current
rank in years as of 04/20/04 (centered), Sex (Female =1; Male = 0), Rank (Asst
Prof = 0; Assoc Prof = 1; Prof =1), Years since degree (centered)
b. Dependent Variable: Salary as of 04/20/04
Model
ANOVA (b)
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean Square
2.2426E+10
5
4485212793
1 Regression
1.2752E+10
164 77753690.14
Residual
3.5178E+10
169
Total
a. Predictors: (Constant), Department (Nat Sci = 1; Soc Sci = 0), Time in current
rank in years as of 04/20/04 (centered), Sex (Female =1; Male = 0), Rank (Asst
Prof = 0; Assoc Prof = 1; Prof =1), Years since degree (centered)
b. Dependent Variable: Salary as of 04/20/04
Model
Gender Equity Project
F
57.685
Hunter College
Sig.
.000(a)
Coefficients (a)
Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Model
1 (Constant)
Sex (Female
=1; Male = 0)
Years since
degree
(centered)
Time in current
rank in years
as of 04/20/04
(centered)
Std. Error
71540.46 2018.44
651.99 1448.65
Standardized
Coefficients
Beta
0.021
t
35.443
0.45
Sig.
0
0.653
793.8
-271.71
102.73
115.55
0.627
-0.161
7.727
-2.351
0
0.02
12914.83
2186.51
0.363
5.907
0
-562.29
1425.26
-0.019
-0.395
0.694
Rank (Asst
Prof = 0; Assoc
Prof = 1; Prof
=1)
Department
(Nat Sci = 1;
Soc Sci = 0)
a. Dependent Variable: Salary as of 04/20/04
Note: Variables in Regression
Salary
Actual salary (in dollars) used; Data retrieved from the City University
Personnel System (CUPS) database by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's
Department of Human Resources on 20 April 2004
Female = 1
Sex
Years since degree
2003 – year of final degree reported on CUPS database; CUPS data retrieved
by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources on 20
April 2004; this variable was centered and the quadratic term was included
Time in current rank in years
Number of years in current appointment; this variable was centered and the
quadratic term was included
Rank
Professor = 1; Associate Professor = 1
Department
Departments were grouped into broader discipline categories (natural and
social sciences) instead of using individual departments to ensure that a
sufficient number of faculty fell into each category (discipline and rank); Natural
Science = 1
Note: The regression output was generated by SPSS 11.5.
Example: To predict the salary of a male assistant professor in the social sciences who has had his degree for 5 years
and has been in that rank for 2 years, look first at the constant term, $7150.46, listed in the first row in the Coefficients
table. Since the dummy variables were chosen as they were, the constant represents the salary for a male assistant
professor in the social sciences. Multiply 5 (Years since degree) by 793.8 and 2 (Time in current rank in years) by 271.71. Add these totals to the constant to get a more accurate estimate of salary. The outcome using these
unstandardized regression coefficients is $74966.04.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 10b. Salary of Science Faculty, 2002-2003 (Controlling for Sex, Years
since degree, Time at Hunter College, Rank, and Department)
Descriptive Statistics
Salary as of 04/20/04
Sex (Female =1; Male = 0)
Years since degree (centered)
Time at Hunter College in years
(centered)
Rank (Asst Prof = 0; Assoc Prof = 1;
Prof =1)
Department (Nat Sci = 1; Soc Sci = 0)
Mean
$81,744.01
Std.
Deviation
$14,427.46
0.34
-0.029
0.47
11.39
170
170
-0.075
11.65
170
0.79
0.4
170
0.42
0.49
170
N
170
Model Summary (b)
Adjusted Std. Error of
R
R Square R Square the Estimate
.793(a)
0.63
0.618
$8,913.38
1
a. Predictors: (Constant), Department (Nat Sci = 1; Soc Sci = 0), Time at Hunter
College in years (centered), Sex (Female =1; Male = 0), Rank (Asst Prof = 0;
Assoc Prof = 1; Prof =1), Years since degree (centered)
b. Dependent Variable: Salary as of 04/20/04
Model
ANOVA (b)
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean Square
22148116280
5
4429623256
1 Regression
13029552869
164
79448493.1
Residual
35177669149
169
Total
a. Predictors: (Constant), Department (Nat Sci = 1; Soc Sci = 0), Time at Hunter
College in years (centered), Sex (Female =1; Male = 0), Rank (Asst Prof = 0;
Assoc Prof = 1; Prof =1), Years since degree (centered)
b. Dependent Variable: Salary as of 04/20/04
Model
Gender Equity Project
F
55.755
Hunter College
Sig.
.000(a)
Coefficients (a)
Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Model
1 (Constant)
Sex (Female
=1; Male = 0)
Years since
degree
(centered)
Time at Hunter
College in
years
(centered)
Standardized
Coefficients
70959.6
Std. Error
2036.4
Beta
994.41
1466.44
0.033
0.678
0.499
793.55
137.09
0.627
5.788
0
-174.3
126.03
-0.141
-1.383
0.169
13320.88
2215.75
0.374
6.012
0
-290.26
1433.55
-0.01
-0.202
0.84
t
34.846
Sig.
0
Rank (Asst
Prof = 0; Assoc
Prof = 1; Prof
=1)
Department
(Nat Sci = 1;
Soc Sci = 0)
a. Dependent Variable: Salary as of 04/20/04
Note: Variables in Regression
Salary
Sex
Years since degree
Time at Hunter College in years
Rank
Department
Actual salary (in dollars) used; Data retrieved from the City University Personnel
System (CUPS) database by Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of
Human Resources on 20 April 2004
Female = 1
2003 – year of final degree reported on CUPS database; CUPS data retrieved by
Martin Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources on 20 April
2004; this variable was centered and the quadratic term was included
Time at Hunter College takes into account all tenure-line years worked at Hunter
College for each professor as of 30 June 2003; CUPS data retrieved by Martin
Fenton in Hunter College's Department of Human Resources on 20 April 2004; this
variable was centered and the quadratic term was included
Professor = 1; Associate Professor = 1
Departments were grouped into broader discipline categories (natural and social
sciences) instead of using individual departments to ensure that a sufficient number
of faculty fell into each category (discipline and rank); Natural Science = 1
Note: The regression output was generated by SPSS 11.5.
Example: To predict the salary of a male assistant professor in the social sciences who has had his degree for 5 years and
has been at Hunter College for 2 years, look first at the constant term, $70959.60, listed in the first row in the Coefficients
table. Since the dummy variables were chosen as they were, the constant represents the salary for a male assistant
professor in the social sciences. Multiply 5 (Years since degree) by 793.55 and 2 (Time at Hunter College in years) by 174.3. Add these totals to the constant to get a more accurate estimate of salary. The outcome using these unstandardized
regression coefficients is $74578.75.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 11a. Means of z-scores for Square Footage by Rank and Division, Spring 2004.
Division
Natural Science
Social Science
Total Science
Assistant
Women
N mean z-score N
4
-0.12
11
14
-0.14
16
18
-0.13
27
Men
mean z-score
-0.01
-0.09
-0.06
Associate
Women
Men
N mean z-score N mean z-score
5
-0.01
12
-0.20
13
-0.54
13
-0.49
18
-0.40
25
-0.35
Full
Women
N mean z-score N
14
0.33
35
15
0.28
31
29
0.30
66
Men
mean z-score
-0.05
0.41
0.17
Note: These tables were created using data obtained from Facilities Management & Planning, ICIT (Instructional Computing and Information
Technology), the Office of the Dean of Arts and Science, and individual science departments. Only spaces assigned to full-time tenured or tenuretrack faculty who were employed at Hunter during the 2003-2004 academic year were included.
Note: z-scores were calculated for each department and the mean of all the z-scores for that division is reported here.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 11b. Mean and Median Square Footage for Women's Space as a Percentage of
Men's Space by Department, Spring 2004.
Division/Department
Natural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Chemistry
Computer Science
Mathematics and Statistics
All Natural Sciences
Women's Space
as a % of men's
Mean
Median
106
98
142
191
61
83
149
175
118
131
Social Sciences
Anthropology
Economics
Geography
Political Science
Psychology
Sociology
All Social Sciences
Women's Space
as a % of men's
Mean
Median
58
63
120
100
93
68
88
79
83
71
94
97
87
74
Note: These tables were created using data obtained from Facilities Management &
Planning, ICIT (Instructional Computing and Information Technology), the Office of the Dean
of Arts and Science, and individual science departments. Only spaces assigned to full-time
tenured or tenure-track faculty who were employed at Hunter during the 2003-2004
academic year were included.
Note: Physics and Astromony is not included in this analysis because there is only one
woman is that department.
Note: The percentages for all natural science and all social science are based on the mean
of the means and mean of the medians.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 11c. Median Split of Square Footage by Sex and Division, Spring 2004.
sex
F
M
total
Natural Sciences
below
above
10
12
29
27
39
39
total
22
56
78
sex
F
M
total
Social Sciences
below
above
24
14
19
27
43
41
total
38
46
84
sex
F
M
total
All Faculty
below
above
34
26
48
54
82
80
total
60
102
162
Note: These tables were created using data obtained from Facilities Management & Planning, ICIT (Instructional Computing and Information
Technology), the Office of the Dean of Arts and Science, and individual science departments. Only spaces assigned to full-time tenured or
tenure-track faculty who were employed at Hunter during the 2003-2004 academic year were included.
Note: Median split computed by finding the median square footage for each department and assigning each faculty a code to indicate if one was
above or below one’s department median. Faculty with allocated space equal to the median are not represented in these tables. Chi-square
analyses were performed of sex and median split to test if women were significantly above or below the median.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Table 12. Startup Package Offers, Baseline (Fall 1998 - Fall 2002)
Item Mentioned in Offer Letter
Letter date
Rank
Department
Effective date of appointment
"appointment is subject to approval of the Board of
Trustees of CUNY and financial ability"
"terms and conditions of employment are those of
CUNY's Bylaws"
collective bargaining agreement between University and
PSC-CUNY
Start date of tenure clock
Effective tenure date
Starting salary
Start-up funds -- a) only total funds listed (with no other
breakdown)
Start-up funds -- b) lab and lab equipment
Start-up funds -- c) computer and computer equipment
Start-up funds -- d) software
Start-up funds -- e) relocation
Start-up funds -- f) travel
Start-up funds -- g) matching funds
Start-up funds -- h) audio/visual equipment
Start-up funds -- i) technical or research assistance
Total of start-up fund items b - i
Total of all start-up funds a - i
Lab or office space
Type of teaching
%Women %Men %Total
N = 14
N = 23 N = 37
93
100
97
100
100
100
100
100
100
86
70
76
71
78
76
43
26
32
43
0
0
93
30
13
9
96
35
8
5
95
29
7
29
0
36
36
14
0
14
50
71
7
29
48
13
22
13
26
17
17
4
13
57
70
35
17
41
11
24
8
30
24
16
3
14
54
70
24
22
Note: The offer letter analysis includes letters from all 11 Hunter College Sciences for faculty who started
from Fall 1998 through Fall 2002. The analysis comprises 37 letters from 39 total hires in tenure bearing
titles (e.g., Assistant Professor or Associate Professor). For two faculty members, 1 woman and 1 man,
only internal memos regarding appointments to the College were sent to the GEP. Data for these two
people were not included.
Note: Redacted offer letters were obtained from the Office of the Dean of Arts and Sciences on 23 April
2004.
Note: b through i may not necessarily add up to the compliment of a because b though i are not mutually
exclusive.
Note: %Women is the percentage of letters to women. %Men is the percentage of letters to men.
%Total is the percentage of total letters.
Gender Equity Project
Hunter College
Download