2. Electrostatics 2A. Method of Images Vanishing Potential from Two Point Charges • • • • Consider two charges q and q' of opposite sign Lets assume without loss of generality that |q| |q'| To simplify, put q at origin and q' on the z –axis at a distance d Potential is 1 q q given by: x 2 2 2 4 0 x 2 y 2 z 2 x y z d • Where is the 2 2 2 2 2 2 q x y z d q x y z potential zero? q 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 2 zd d 2 q2 x 2 y 2 z 2 q 2 q2 x 2 y 2 z 2 2q 2 dz q 2 d 2 0 q' d q Case 1: Planes • Suppose the two charges are equal and opposite, then the potential vanishes at 2q 2 dz q 2 d 2 0 q 2 q2 x 2 y 2 z 2 2q 2 dz q 2 d 2 0 z 12 d • This is a plane that is equidistant between the two points How is this useful? • Suppose we have a plane with Dirichlet boundary conditions = 0 on the plane • If you pretend there is an “image charge” – q on the other side of the Dirichlet boundary, the two charges will produce a potential that cancels on the boundary • It will also satisfy 2 = –/0 in the allowed region –q d q Sample Problem 2.1 (1) An infinite line of charge with linear charge density is at z = h, x = 0 above a plane conductor at z = 0. Find the electric field everywhere for z > 0, and the surface charge. • The conductor is at constant potential h • Since it extends forever, assume it has = 0 • Add an opposite charge line charge on the other side of the conductor ρ – This guarantees that = 0 on the conductor E ρˆ o • Electric field from the original line charge 2 0 2 0 2 • is a vector pointing from the line ρ xxˆ z h zˆ charge directly to the point of interest • So the electric field from the original line is E xxˆ z h zˆ o • The image line charge causes an electric field 2 0 x 2 z h 2 • So the total field is: xxˆ z h zˆ xxˆ z h zˆ xxˆ z h zˆ E 2 2 Ei 2 2 2 2 0 x z h x z h 2 0 x 2 z h Sample Problem 2.1 (2) An infinite line of charge with linear charge density is at z = h, x = 0 above a plane conductor at z = 0. Find the electric field everywhere for z > 0, and the surface charge. E 2 0 xxˆ z h zˆ xxˆ z h zˆ 2 2 2 2 x z h x z h h • To find the surface charge on the conductor, first find the electric field there hzˆ xxˆ hzˆ xxˆ hzˆ E z 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 x h 0 2 x h x h 0 • Note that it is perpendicular to the surface there, as it must be • Related to surface density by h ˆ E n zˆ 0 0 x2 h2 • Can show that, in this case, integrated surface charge cancels the original line Case 2: Spheres 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 • Suppose |q| > |q'| q q x y z 2 q dz q d 0 then the potential 2 2 2 q d q d 2 2 2 vanishes when x y z 2 2 z 2 0 2 2 q q q q • Complete the square 2 qd qd qd qd x y z 2 2 z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 q q q q q q q q 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 q q d q d q d q d 2 2 x y z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 q q q q q q q q 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 • This is a sphere of radius: • Distance from q to center: • Distance from q' to center: qqd a 2 q q2 q2d r 2 q q2 q2 1 d r r d 2 2 q q 2 2 a r' q' r d q q2 d r 2 q q 2 Conducting Spheres qqd a 2 q q2 q2d r 2 q q2 q2 d r 2 q q 2 • Let’s put these formulas a q r together in a useful way: r q a How is this useful? • Suppose we had a grounded ( = 0) conducting sphere of radius a • Plus a point charge q at distance r > a • Pretend there is an image 2 aq a charge q' at distance r', where q , r r r • This will exactly cancel the potential from the charge q on the surface of the sphere • And it will satisfy 2 = 0 outside the sphere • So we have solved the problem! a r' q' r q Sample Problem 2.2a A conducting sphere of radius a with potential = 0 at the origin has a charge q on the z-axis at z = 2a. Find the potential (outside), and the total charge on the sphere. 2 aq aq a • Add an image charge q 12 q q , r 2a r r 2 of magnitude a 1 r • It will be at 2a 1 2a 1 q 2 • The potential is then x 1 4 0 x 2azˆ x 2 azˆ To get the charge: • The hard way: – Find the electric field from the potential – Get the surface charge everywhere and integrate • The easy way: – Use Gauss’s Law on a surface surrounding the sphere – Electric field looks like point charge –q/2 – So charge on sphere must be –q/2 Q 12 q q 2a – q/2 a/2 a Sample Problem 2.2b A neutral conducting sphere of radius a at the origin has a charge q on the z-axis at z = 2a. Find the potential. • • • • • • First guess: We can do this exactly the same way as Problem 2.2a This is wrong because the sphere had charge – q/2 So far we have = 0 on the sphere To cancel this charge, add additional charge + q/2 on the sphere It will distribute itself uniformly over the surface This creates additional potential that looks like a point charge of magnitude + q/2 at the center • Total potential (outside) is sum of these three contributions q 1 1 1 x 1 ˆ ˆ 4 0 x 2az 2 x 2 az 2 x q 2a q/2 a – q/2 a/2 Hollow Spheres • We can use the same formulas for spherical cavity in a conductor • Place an image charge at r' of magnitude q' aq a2 q , r r r • Combination will cause vanishing potential on the interior surface • You don’t have to worry about whether surrounding conductor is neutral, since excess charge flows away from interior surface • If you want to make 0 on interior surface, just add a constant to it – It is irrelevant anyway. q q' Green’s Functions for Planes and Spheres • Since we know how to get the potential for a point charge near a conducting plane or sphere we can find the Green’s functions for them • Green’s functions (with Dirichlet boundary conditions) satisfy 2G x, x 4 3 x x ' and G x, x xS 0 D • For a plane at z = 0 for the region z > 0, one source at x, one at xR = (x, y,–z) G x, x 1 1 x x x R x • For a sphere at origin with radius a, one point at x of size 1, one point at xR = a x 1 a2x/x2 with magnitude –a/|x| G x, x 2 2 x x a x x x • With some work can rewrite this as G x, x 1 x x 2x x 2 2 • This formula also works for interior of a sphere as well a a 4 x 2 x2 2a 2 x x Using Green’s Functions for Spheres (1) 1 a • Probably easiest G x, x 2 2 to use in x x 2x x a 4 x 2 x2 2a 2 x x spherical coordinates 1 a G x, x – is angle 2 2 4 2 2 2 r r 2 rr cos a r r 2 a rr cos between x and x' • We can then use this formula for Dirichlet problems with spherical boundary 1 1 3 x G x , x x d x x G x, x da 4 0 V 4 S n • The normal derivative is: r r cos ar 2 r a 3r cos G x, x G x, x 3/2 3/2 2 2 4 2 2 2 n r r r 2rr cos a r r 2a rr cos • On the a r cos r 2 a 1 r cos a r 2 a 1 3/2 3/2 3/2 surface 2 2 2 2 2 2 r a 2ra cos a r 2ra cos r a 2ra cos r' = a this becomes Using Green’s Functions for Spheres (1) G x, x x 1 4 0 V 1 r 2 r 2 2rr cos G x, x x d 3x 1 4 a a 4 r 2 r 2 2a 2 rr cos S x G x, x da n a r 2 a 1 G x, x xS 3/2 2 2 n r a 2ra cos • Finally, the surface integral will take the form: • So we have S da a 2 d arˆ d a 2 2 x G x, x x d x r a 3/2 V 2 2 4 0 4 r a 2ar cos 1 3 Sample Problem 2.3 (1) The potential on the surface of a sphere of radius a centered at the origin is given by = Ez. Find the potential outside the sphere. x z • We use our a 2 Ez d 2 x r a formula for 3/2 2 2 4 r a 2ar cos the potential, ignoring the term • For purposes of this integral, treat x as if it were the z-axis – This makes = ' • With this choice of z-axis, what we normally call z-direction becomes – is angle between x and ordinary z-axis z z cos x sin • We are on the surface z cos x sin a cos cos a sin cos sin of the sphere, so • So we have: • Set up the integrals a2 E 2 cos cos sin sin cos 2 x r a d 3/2 2 2 4 r a 2ar cos Sample Problem 2.3 (2) The potential on the surface of a sphere of radius a centered at the origin is given by = Ez. Find the potential outside the sphere. x z 2 a E 2 cos cos sin sin cos 2 x r a d cos d 3/2 2 2 4 1 0 r a 2ar cos 1 2 2 a E 2 cos cos d cos 2 • Do the ' integral r a 3/2 2 2 2 1 r a 2ar cos 2 2 • Let w r a 2ar cos 1 x a E r a 2 2 2 2ar 2 r 2 a 2 2 ar 2 cos r 2 a 2 w w3/2 dw r a 2 2 ar 2 r a 2 Ea3 x 2 cos r 18 r 2 E r 2 a 2 cos 2 r 2 a 2 w 2w 2 r a 2 2 2 2 E 2 r a r a 2 2 r a cos r a r a 4r ra r a 12 1 2 Sample Problem 2.4 A neutral conducting sphere of radius a is placed in a background electric field given by E Ezˆ . Find the potential everywhere outside the sphere. • • • • • • E Recall: This suggests x Ez But this can’t be right because it is not constant at r = a Let’s try to find a solution of the form: x Ez x Since there’s no charge outside, we must have 0 2 2 We need to cancel the potential from the first term, so 0 arˆ Ez arˆ arˆ Ez • We already solved this problem: a3 E 2 cos r • So the answer is: a3 Ez E 2 cos r a3 x E cos r 2 r 2B. Orthogonal Functions and Expansions General Theory of Orthogonal Functions • Let Un(x) be a set of functions in some region in d dimensions – d may be less than 3, even if the problem is 3-dimensional! • If we have enough functions Un(x), we can often approximate any function as linear combinations of these functions f x anU n x n 1 • Often, finite sum is a good approximation for the infinite • It is useful to normally arrange the Un’s to be orthogonal * d – This can always be arranged U x U x d x 0 if m n m n V – See quantum notes for details * d • Assuming the integral is finite when m = n, you can U x U x d x nm m n V normalize them to make them orthonormal • Given f(x), it is not hard to find the coefficients an: V U x f x d x V amU x U m x d x am nm * n d m 1 * n d m 1 an U n* x f x d d x V Completeness Relation, and Other Comments f x anU n x n 1 an U n* x f x d d x V f x * d U x U x f x d x n n • Substitute the expression V n 1 on the right into the left * • Since this is true for any function f(x), U n x U n x x x we must have the completeness relation n 1 • I’m not sure what means, because I’m not sure how many dimensions we’re in Sometimes, we might not want all possible functions • We might want functions that vanish Un x S 0 at certain locations, so we’d choose – Completeness still works in interior • We might want functions that have 2 Un x 0 vanishing Laplacian, so we’d choose – This will ruin completeness 1D Discrete Fourier Transforms • Consider functions on the region (0, a) with periodic boundary conditions, f(0) = f(a) • It is well known that a complete set of functions 2 inx that satisfy this equation are the Fourier modes: U n x exp a a – n =0, 1, 2, 3, * U 0 m x U n x dx a nm • These are not quite orthonormal 2 inx • Any function can be written in terms of them: f x n exp • Coefficients are 1 a a 2 inx n n f x exp dx a 0 a • Sometimes, it is easier to work with real functions cos 2 nx , sin 2 nx a a – n = 0, 1, 2, 3, • Then we can write any 2 nx 2 nx 1 f x 2 A0 An cos function in terms of them: Bn sin a a n 1 • Coefficients are: 2 a 2 a 2 nx 2 nx An f x cos dx , Bn 0 f x sin dx 0 a a a a 1D With Vanishing Boundaries • If we instead demand that f(0) = 0 = f(a), we should use some different functions • Use real functions, but want them to vanish at these points: U x sin nx n – n = 1, 2, 3, a • Not quite orthonormal a nx mx 0 sin a sin a dx 2 nm a • We can write an arbitrary function in the form: nx f x An sin a n 1 • The coefficients are given by 2 a nx An f x sin dx 0 a a 2D With Vanishing Boundaries • Suppose we have a 2D problem with f(x,y) where 0 < x < a and 0 < y < b • Let’s suppose we want f to vanish on all four boundaries • Since f vanishes at x = 0 and x = a, we must be able to write nx f x, y An y sin b a n 1 • Since f vanishes at y = 0 and y = b, the same must be true of An • Therefore, An must be writable in the form my An y Anm sin b m 1 • We therefore have • Coefficients are: nx my f x, y Anm sin sin a b n 1 m 1 b 4 a nx my Anm dx dy f x , y sin sin 0 ab 0 a b a Continuous Bases * U n xU n x x x f x anU n x n 1 n 1 an U n* x f x d d x V U m* x U n x d d x nm • It is sometimes the case that you need to use a basis where n takes on continuous values • We might write the basis functions as U(x) • Then all sums become integrals • The relations above get changed to: * U xU x d x x f x U x d U x f x d x * d V U * x U x d d x Continuous Fourier Transforms • Theorem from quantum: eikx dx 2 k • Consider the set of functions: U k x • • • • • 1 ikx e 2 1 i k k x They are orthonormal: U x U k x dx 2 e dx k k 1 i x x k * Also complete U k xU k x dk 2 e dk x x 1 ikx So we can write arbitrary f x A k e dx functions in terms of these 2 1 Amplitude is given by ikx Ak f x e dx 2 Can find similar formulas in 3D: 1 ik x 3 1 ik x 3 A k f x e d k f x A k e d x 3/2 3/2 2 2 * k Decomposition in Different Coordinates 2 x 0 Consider the Laplacian in 3D in different coordinate systems: 2 2 2 • Cartesian: 2 2 2 2 x y z 2 2 1 1 2 • Cylindrical: 2 2 2 z • Spherical: 2 2 1 1 1 2 r r sin 2 2 r r r sin r 2 sin 2 2 • Often good to solve problem explicitly by writing function as a complete function in some of these variables, and unknown function in others nx my f x, y, z Anm z sin sin a b n 1 m 1 2C. Solving Problems in Cartesian Coordinates The Method • Suppose, for example, you have a box with potential zero on some surfaces 0, y, z a, y, z x,0, z x, b, z 0 • And let’s say it’s specified on others x, y , c t x, y t x, y 0 x, y , 0 b x, y • Write the potential in terms of complete functions on x and y nx my x, y, z Anm z sin sin a b n,m • If there is no charge inside, then 2 0 0 0 0 b x, y Modes That Satisfy Laplace’s Equation • • • • • nx ny 2 x, y, z Anm z sin sin 0 a b n,m Substitute this d 2 2 n 2 2 m2 nx my into Laplace’s 0 2 2 2 Anm z sin sin dz a a a b n,m equation: Since these wave functions are d 2 2 n 2 2 m2 0 2 2 2 Anm z independent, we must have a a dz Define 2 2 2 2 n m 2 2 d nm 2 2 2 Then we have A z A z a b nm nm nm 2 dz The general solution of this equation is Anm z nme nm z nme nm z nx my x, y, z nme nm z nme nm z sin sin a b n,m Matching the Boundary Equations x, y, z nme nm z nme n,m nm z nx my sin sin a b 2 nm 2 n2 a 2 2 m2 b2 • We haven’t matched the boundary conditions • On the top and bottom, we can also write the (known) potential as nx my b x, y A sin sin a b n,m b nm • We can get the coefficients • • • • nx my t x, y A sin sin a b n,m t nm b 4 a nx my A dx dy x , y sin sin b 0 ab 0 a b b nm To get it to match at z = 0, we must have To get it to match at z = c, we must have Two equations in two unknowns Solve for nm and nm and we have b Anm nm nm t Anm nm e nmc nm e nm c Sample Problem 2.5 (1) A cube of size a has potential 0 on five faces and potential = xy on the last face. What is the potential everywhere, and at the center? xy 0 2 nm 2 n2 m2 a 2 • We have 0 x, y, z nme nm z nme nm z sin nx a sin my a n,m • We need it to vanish on z = 0, so nm = –nm x, y, z 2 nm sinh nm z sin nx a sin my a 0 0 0 n,m • To match on z = a, xy 2 nm sinh nm a sin nx a sin my a n,m we have 2 4 a a a nm 4 nx my • Find the 1 2 nm sinh nm a 2 dx xy sin sin 2 0 a 0 coefficients a a nm x, y , z 4 a 2 2 1 n m sinh nm z nx my 1 sin sin nm sinh a a a nm n,m Sample Problem 2.5 (2) A cube of size a has potential 0 on five faces and potential = xy on the last face. What is the potential everywhere, and at the center? 2 nm 2 n2 m2 a 2 4 a 1 n m sinh nm z nx my x, y , z 2 1 sin sin n ,m nm sinh nm a a a • Now just substitute in the center a, a, a 1 2 4 a 2 2 1 2 n , m odd 4 a 2 2 1 1 n , m nm sinh sinh nm 1 nm sinh n m sinh 0 0 0 2 1 2 xy 1 2 n2 m2 2 2 1 2 0 0 sin n sin m n m n2 m2 n m 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 0.0416666666 a 2 with 62 terms 2D. Solving Probs. in Cylindrical Coordinates Potential in a Sharp Corner 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 z • Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates • Let’s do a 2D problem – Everything independent of z • Consider a sharp conducting angle of size with vanishing potential • Presumably other sources/potentials somewhere else • The potential must vanish at = 0 and = • We therefore can n , R sin n write the potential as n • Substitute into 2 0 1 2 n2 n 0 Rn 2 2 Rn sin n 1 • To make this vanish, we must have 2 n2 1 Rn 2 2 Rn 0 Solving the Radial Equation 2 n2 • Second order differential equation should 1 Rn 2 2 Rn 0 have two linearly independent solutions • Guess solutions of the form Rn ~ 2 2 • We therefore have 1 2 n 2 n 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 • We therefore have • The general solution is n Rn An n Bn n • If we want finite potential near = 0, must choose Bn = 0 • Therefore: , A n sin n n • Largest contribution from n = 1: Rn An n n , A1 sin Electric Field near a Sharp Corner , A1 sin • The electric field is the derivative of the potential 1 φˆ E ρˆ 1 A1 ρˆ sin φˆ cos • This expression diverges at small if > • The sharper the corner, the faster it diverges • In 3D, electric fields maximum at pointy places • Lightning rods have large fields, cause charge to flow from atmosphere • Drains away charge buildup in vicinity of the rod