Texas Education Agency 2014­15 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools Campus Name: SEGUIN EL Campus ID: 101912373 District Name: HOUSTON ISD Part I: Student Achievement by Proficiency Level This section provides the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) performance results for each subject area and grade level tested in the 2014­15 school year. These results include all students tested, whether or not they were in the accountability subset. Two or African American Pacific More Special Econ StateDistrictCampusAmericanHispanicWhite Indian AsianIslanderRaces Ed Disadv ELLFemaleMaleMigrant STAAR Percent at Phase­in 1 Level II or Above Grade 3 Reading 2015 74% 69% 70% * 72% * ­ ­ * * * 69% 76% 73% 67% ­ 2014 75% 69% 79% * 83% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 55% 78% 91% 89% 70% ­ Mathematics2015 74% 70% 70% * 71% * ­ ­ * * * 70% 72% 68% 71% ­ 2014 69% 66% 89% 90% 89% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 73% 89% 94% 94% 86% ­ Grade 4 Reading 2015 71% 62% 62% * 63% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 60% 59% 76% 51% * 2014 73% 66% 67% 75% 67% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 68% 60% 77% 58% ­ Mathematics2015 71% 66% 67% 63% 67% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 66% 61% 74% 61% * 2014 70% 65% 68% * 73% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 69% 68% 79% 58% ­ Writing 2015 67% 63% 66% 63% 66% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 64% 59% 79% 56% * 2014 72% 68% 76% 100% 74% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 77% 72% 94% 58% ­ Grade 5 Reading 2015 83% 77% 84% 100% 83% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 84% 67% 90% 78% ­ 2014 86% 79% 90% 83% 90% ­ ­ * ­ ­ 100% 89% 71% 89% 90% ­ Mathematics2015 75% 71% 61% * 63% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 61% 50% 67% 55% ­ 2014 87% 83% 94% 83% 94% ­ ­ * ­ ­ 80% 93% 82% 95% 93% ­ Science 2015 69% 62% 67% 71% 66% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 66% 41% 67% 66% ­ 2014 73% 66% 75% * 79% ­ ­ * ­ ­ * 74% 47% 73% 78% ­ All Grades All Subjects 2015 73% 66% 68% 59% 69% * ­ ­ * * 18% 68% 63% 74% 63% * 2014 75% 69% 80% 66% 81% ­ ­ * ­ ­ 60% 79% 77% 86% 73% ­ Reading 2015 74% 65% 72% 63% 72% * ­ ­ * * 21% 71% 68% 80% 64% * 2014 75% 67% 78% 63% 79% ­ ­ * ­ ­ 68% 78% 77% 85% 72% ­ Mathematics2015 73% 67% 66% 50% 67% * ­ ­ * * * 66% 63% 70% 63% * 2014 76% 70% 83% 67% 85% ­ ­ * ­ ­ 68% 83% 83% 89% 79% ­ Writing 2015 68% 63% 66% 63% 66% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 64% 59% 79% 56% * 2014 71% 68% 76% 100% 74% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 77% 72% 94% 58% ­ Science 2015 75% 66% 67% 71% 66% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * 66% 41% 67% 66% ­ 2014 77% 70% 75% * 79% ­ ­ * ­ ­ * 74% 47% 73% 78% ­ STAAR Percent at Final Level II or Above All Grades All Subjects 2015 38% 33% 27% 11% 28% * ­ ­ * * 0% 27% 24% 29% 26% * 2014 39% 34% 40% 15% 42% ­ ­ * ­ ­ 34% 39% 39% 45% 35% ­ Reading 2015 40% 33% 30% 17% 31% * ­ ­ * * 0% 29% 24% 33% 27% * 2014 42% 35% 38% 13% 40% ­ ­ * ­ ­ 29% 36% 41% 44% 31% ­ Mathematics2015 36% 33% 28% 2014 37% 34% 48% Writing 2015 31% 28% 22% 2014 34% 31% 28% Science 2015 40% 32% 22% 2014 40% 33% 36% STAAR Percent at Level III Advanced All Grades All Subjects 2015 14% 13% 10% 2014 14% 12% 19% Reading 2015 15% 13% 13% 2014 14% 12% 19% Mathematics2015 14% 14% 10% 2014 15% 15% 28% Writing 2015 8% 8% 6% 2014 6% 6% 2% Science 2015 14% 11% 8% 2014 13% 10% 4% STAAR Participation (All Grades) All Tests 2015 99% 2014 99% Reading 2015 99% 2014 99% Mathematics 2015 99% 2014 99% Writing 2015 99% 2014 99% Science 2015 99% 2014 99% 8% 21% 29% 50% * ­ ­ ­ ­ * * ­ * ­ * 46% 29% 29% 27% 29% 47% 46% 55% 41% * ­ 13% 0% 23% 31% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * * 23% 22% 33% 14% 28% 24% 34% 22% * ­ 0% * 23% 37% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * ­ ­ ­ ­ * * 19% 6% 35% 6% 20% 23% 27% 45% ­ ­ 0% 5% 10% 20% * ­ ­ ­ ­ * * ­ * ­ 0% 8% 10% 8% 10% 10% 18% 20% 23% 15% * ­ 0% 0% 13% 21% * ­ ­ ­ ­ * * ­ * ­ 0% 11% 13% 10% 13% 13% 18% 22% 24% 15% * ­ 0% 13% 10% 30% * ­ ­ ­ ­ * * ­ * ­ * 7% 10% 7% 11% 8% 27% 28% 34% 23% * ­ 0% 0% 7% 2% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * * 7% 2% 6% 2% 10% 4% 4% 0% * ­ 0% * 8% 4% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * ­ ­ ­ ­ * * 7% 4% 0% 0% 4% 3% 11% 5% ­ ­ 99% 100% 95% 100% 100% ­ 98% 100% 100% 100% ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% * ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ­ 98% 100% 96% 100% 100% ­ 98% 100% 100% 100% ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% * ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ­ 99% 100% 96% 100% 100% ­ 99% 100% 100% 100% ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% * ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ­ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ­ 99% 99% 88% 100% 97% 100% 100% 100% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ * ­ ­ ­ ­ 100% 99% 100% 100% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% STAAR Participation Results by Assessment Type for Students Served in Special Education Settings (All Grades) Reading Tests % of Participants 2015 98% 98% 100% * 100% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% % STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2015 17% 25% 0% * 0% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 0% 0% 0% % STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2015 71% 58% 100% * 100% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% % STAAR Alternate2 2015 10% 15% 0% * 0% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 0% 0% 0% % of Non­Participants 2015 2% 2% 0% * 0% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 0% 0% 0% Mathematics Tests % of Participants 2015 99% 99% 100% * 100% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% % STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations 2015 13% 20% 0% * 0% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 0% 0% 0% % STAAR/EOC With Accommodations 2015 74% 62% 100% * 100% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 100% % STAAR Alternate2 2015 11% 17% 0% * 0% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 0% 0% 0% % of Non­Participants 2015 1% 1% 0% * 0% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 0% 0% 0% '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '­' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. 100% 100% 0% 0% ­ ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% ­ ­ ­ 100% 100% ­ 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% ­ ­ ­ ­ Part II: Student Achievement and State Academic Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs) This section provides the STAAR performance results for each subject area tested in the 2014­15 school year. These results only include tested students who were in the accountability subset. This section also includes four­year and five­year graduation rates and participation rates on STAAR for reading and mathematics. Two or ELL Pacific More Econ Special (Current & Islander Races Disadv Ed Monitored) ELL + All African American Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Performance Status ‡ Target 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% Reading N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N Mathematics N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N Participation Status ‡ Target 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Reading Y Y n/a n/a n/a n/a Y Mathematics Y Y n/a n/a n/a n/a Y Federal Graduation Status (Target: See Reason Codes) Graduation Target n/a n/a n/a n/a Met Reason Code *** n/a n/a n/a n/a District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Alternate 1% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit Mathematics Alternate 1% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit '‡' Results for grade 3­8 mathematics, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate 2 are included in 2015 Federal System Safeguards. '+' Participation uses ELL (Current) rate, Graduation uses ELL (Ever HS) rate '***' Federal Graduation Rate Reason Codes: a = Graduation Rate Goal of 90% b = Four­year Graduation Rate Target of 83% c = Safe Harbor Target of a 10% decrease in difference from the prior year rate and the goal d = Five­year Graduation Rate Target of 88% Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report. Performance Rates ‡ Reading # at Phase­in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests % at Phase­in Satisfactory Standard Mathematics # at Phase­in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests % at Phase­in Satisfactory Standard Writing 83% N N n/a n/a n/a n/a 95% Y Y n/a n/a Two or ELL All African American Pacific More Econ Special (Current & ELL Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed Monitored) (Current) 198 13 182 * ­ ­ * * 179 5 142 n/a 273 73% 21 62% 248 73% * * ­ ­ ­ ­ * * * * 251 71% 24 21% 185 77% 140 n/a 181 11 166 * ­ ­ * * 165 * 127 n/a 272 67% 21 52% 247 67% * * ­ ­ ­ ­ * * * * 250 66% * * 184 69% 139 n/a # at Phase­in Satisfactory 63 5 58 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 56 * 45 Standard Total Tests 95 8 87 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 87 * 65 % at Phase­in 66% 63% 67% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 64% * 69% Satisfactory Standard Science # at Phase­in Satisfactory 62 5 57 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 56 * 37 Standard Total Tests 88 6 82 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 81 * 57 % at Phase­in 70% 83% 70% ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 69% * 65% Satisfactory Standard Social Studies # at Phase­in Satisfactory ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ Standard Total Tests ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ % at Phase­in ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ Satisfactory Standard Participation Rates ‡ Reading: 2014­2015 Assessments Number Participating 293 24 265 * ­ ­ * * 268 24 n/a Total Students 294 25 265 * ­ ­ * * 269 24 n/a Participation Rate 100% 96% 100% * ­ ­ * * 100% 100% n/a Mathematics: 2014­2015 Assessments Number Participating 291 24 263 * ­ ­ * * 267 24 n/a Total Students 292 25 263 * ­ ­ * * 268 24 n/a Participation Rate 100% 96% 100% * ­ ­ * * 100% 100% n/a '‡' Results for grade 3­8 mathematics, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate 2 are included in 2015 Federal System Safeguards. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). '­' Indicates there are no students in the group. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report. n/a 49 n/a n/a 31 n/a n/a ­ n/a 154 154 100% 152 152 100% Two or ELL All African American Pacific More Econ Special (Ever ELL Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed HS) (Current) Federal Graduation Rates 4­year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9­12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ Total in Class ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ Graduation Rate ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 4­year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9­12): Class of 2013 Number Graduated ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ Total in Class ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ Graduation Rate ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 5­year Extended Graduation Rate (Gr 9­12): Class of 2013 Number Graduated ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ Total in Class ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ Graduation Rate ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a Mathematics Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap Limit n/a '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). '­' Indicates there are no students in the group. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report. Source: 2015 Accountability Federal System Safeguards Report ­ ­ ­ n/a ­ n/a ­ ­ ­ n/a ­ n/a ­ ­ ­ n/a ­ n/a Part III: Priority and Focus Schools Priority schools are the lowest 5% of Title I served campuses based on performance in reading, mathematics and graduation rates. Priority schools include Tier I or Tier II TTIPS schools, campuses with graduation rates less than 60%, and lowest achieving campuses based on All Students reading/math performance.Focus schools are 10% of Title I served campuses, not already identified as priority schools, that have the widest gaps between student group performance and safeguard targets. Campuses are ranked based on the largest gaps between student group reading/math performance and the annual measurable objectives (AMO) target of 75%. Priority School Identification: Priority School Reason: N/A No Focus School Reason: N/A Focus School Identification: No A high­performance reward school is identified as a Title I school with distinctions based on reading and math performance. In addition, at the high school level, a reward school is a Title I school with the highest graduation rates. A high progress school is identified as a Title I school in the top 25% in annual improvement; and/or a school in the top 25% of those demonstrating ability to close performance gaps based on system safeguards. High Performing School: Yes High Progress School: Yes Source: TEA Division of School Improvement and Support Part IV: Teacher Quality Data Part IV A: Percent of Teachers by Highest Degree Held Professional qualifications of all public elementary and secondary school teachers in the State of Texas. The distribution of degrees attained by teachers are shown as the percent of total Full­Time Equivalent (FTE) count of teachers with no degree, bachelor’s, master’s, and doctorate degrees. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Campus ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Number Percent No Degree Bachelors Masters Doctorate 1.0 32.0 6.6 0.0 District Percent 1.2% 69.1% 28.1% 1.6% 2.5% 80.7% 16.8% 0.0% State Percent 0.9% 75.1% 23.4% 0.6% Part IV B and C: Teachers with Emergency/Provisional Credentials, Highly Qualified (HQ) Teachers Low Poverty/ High Poverty Summary Reports The percentage of all public elementary and secondary school teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials, and the percentage of classes in the state not taught by highly qualified teachers disaggregated by high­poverty compared to low­ poverty schools. For this purpose, high­poverty means schools in the top quartile of poverty and low­poverty means the bottom quartile of poverty in the state. High Poverty Core Academic Subject Areas Total Number of Teachers Total Number of Classes Number of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Number of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers General Education Special Education Total Number Percent Number 33 33 33 100.00% 0 2 2 2 100.00% 0 35 35 35 100.00% 0 Percent 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Number of Core Academic Teachers Who Are Teaching on the Following Permits Emergency (for certified personnel) Emergency (for uncertified personnel) Non­renewable Temporary Classroom Assignment District Teaching Temporary ­­­­­­­­­­­­ Number of Teachers ­­­­­­­­ ­­­­ Elem secondary (PK­6) (7­12) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Core Academic Teachers with a Probationary Certificate Enrolled in an Alternative Certification Highly Qualified Not Highly Qualified ­­­­­­­­­­­­ Number of Teachers ­­­­­­­­­­­­ General Education Special Education 3 0 0 0 Source: TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Part V: Graduates Enrolled in Texas Institution of Higher Education (IHE) This section provides the percentage of students who enroll and begin instruction at an institution of higher education in the school year (fall or spring semester) following high school graduation. The rate reflects the percent of total graduates during the 2011­12 school year who attended a public or independent college or university in Texas in the 2012­13 academic year. Report Not Required Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Part VI: Statewide National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Results The most recent NAEP results for Texas are provided showing statewide reading and mathematics performance results and participation rates, disaggregated by student group. State Level: 2015 Percentages at NAEP Achievement Levels Grade Grade 4 Subject Reading Student Group Overall American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Language Learners National School Lunch Program Mathematics Overall % Below Basic 36 n/a 13 49 44 18 71 59 46 % At or Above Basic 64 n/a 87 51 56 82 29 41 54 % At or Above Proficient 31 n/a 66 17 22 50 11 12 20 % At or Above Advanced 7 n/a 30 2 3 13 2 2 3 14 86 44 8 Grade 8 American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Language Learners National School Lunch Program n/a 3 24 16 7 41 23 19 n/a 97 76 84 93 59 77 81 n/a 82 29 37 60 18 28 30 n/a 36 2 4 15 2 2 2 Reading Overall American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Language Learners National School Lunch Program 28 n/a 12 38 35 14 70 71 36 72 n/a 88 62 65 86 30 29 64 28 n/a 55 19 19 43 5 2 18 2 n/a 12 2 1 4 n/a n/a 1 Mathematics Overall American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Language Learners National School Lunch Program 25 n/a 5 43 31 12 62 60 34 75 n/a 95 57 69 88 38 40 66 32 n/a 67 16 23 48 8 6 20 7 n/a 25 2 4 12 1 n/a 3 State Level: 2015 Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students Grade Grade 4 Grade 8 Subject Reading Student Group Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient % 72 92 Mathematics Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient 80 95 Reading Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient 81 95 Mathematics Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient 81 90 Source: TEA Division of Student Assessment