Previous Page |
Close Preview
FCT Student Assessment of Facilitators Fall Year 1‘ 10-11 (Fall 2010)
Course Information
Course Name: INMD 0000 01 - Foundations of Critical Thinking (FCT) Cases Y1
Department: Interdisciplinary Medicine
Director(s): William Fleischmann
Period / Site: Default Block / Default Teaching Site
If you have questions or comments about this survey, click [here] to send a message to the survey administrator.
Foundations of Critical Thinking (FCT)
Hemesath, Karla
ALPHA
Use this form to provide feedback on the Facilitator’s performance specifically as it relates to your FCT
small group so far.
Students Assessing Facilitators
1)
Promoted a reasoning pricess which included: problem definition, mechanisms, hypothesis formation,
hypothesis testing and hypothesis re-ranking.
Strongly Agree
2)
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Encouraged the group to determine appropriate learning issues.
Strongly Agree
7)
Agree
Encouraged the integration of learning issues in basic sciences with clinical experiences.
Strongly Agree
6)
Strongly Disagree
Encouraged students to link information from previous experiences.
Strongly Agree
5)
Disagree
Encouraged discussion of issues across levels of organizations(cellular and molecular, gross and
microscopic, individual-family-community-behavioral-psychosocial).
Strongly Agree
4)
Agree
Refrained from providing content knowledge except when necessary to correct misunderstanding.
Strongly Agree
3)
(Hemesath, Karla)
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Encouraged students to succintly summarize learning issues.
Strongly Agree
8)
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Encouraged students to use evidence and data in presenting their reasoning.
Strongly Agree
9)
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Guided the group by asking open-ended questions.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
10) Helped the group to stay "on-track".
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
11) Had effective communication skills.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
12) Showed enthusiasm for the FCT process.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
13) Promoted meaningful self/peer assessment.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
14) Provided constructive feedback.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Students Assessing FCT Sessions
(Hemesath, Karla)
15) FCT helped me to communicate effectively with others.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
16) The FCT cases improved my ability to use evidence to support my thinking and reasoning processes.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
17) The FCT cases improved my ability to learn basic sciences and apply them to the clinical setting.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
18) The FCT small group helped me to work effectively in a team environment.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
19) I enjoyed learning using the FCT cases.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
If you have questions or comments about this survey, click [here] to send a message to the survey administrator.
Close Preview