Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 18 Analysis Modeling for WebApps copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University Use Only May be reproduced ONLY for student use at the university level when used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. Any other reproduction or use is expressly prohibited. These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 1 Analysis Content Analysis. The full spectrum of content to be provided by the WebApp is identified, including text, graphics and images, video, and audio data. Data modeling can be used to identify and describe each of the data objects. Interaction Analysis. The manner in which the user interacts with the WebApp is described in detail. Use-cases can be developed to provide detailed descriptions of this interaction. Functional Analysis. The usage scenarios (use-cases) created as part of interaction analysis define the operations that will be applied to WebApp content and imply other processing functions. All operations and functions are described in detail. Configuration Analysis. The environment and infrastructure in which the WebApp resides are described in detail. These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 2 When Do We Perform Analysis? In some WebE situations, analysis and design merge. However, an explicit analysis activity occurs when … the WebApp to be built is large and/or complex the number of stakeholders is large the number of Web engineers and other contributors is large the goals and objectives (determined during formulation) for the WebApp will effect the business’ bottom line the success of the WebApp will have a strong bearing on the success of the business These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 3 The User Hierarchy SafeHomeAssured.com user guest regist ered user new cust omer cust omer serv ice st aff exist ing cust omer Figure 18.1 User hierarchy f or Saf eHomeAssured.com These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 4 Use-Case Diagram describe home lay out <<i n c l u d e >> peruse desc ript ive c ont ent cust omize Saf eHome s elec t Saf eHome component s <<i n c l u d e >> <<i n c l u d e >> s ave c onf igurat ion c us t omiz at ion f unc t ionalit y log-in t o Saf eHomeA s sured.com v iew shopping c art <<i n c l u d e >> purc has e conf igurat ion new c ust omer <<i n c l u d e >> provide purchase dat a recall sav ed conf igurat ion <<i n c l u d e >> complet e Saf eHome order e-commerc e f unct ionalit y Figure 18.2 Use-case diagram f or new-cust omer These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 5 Refining the Use-Case Model Use-cases are organized into functional packages Each package is assessed [CON00] to ensure that it is: Comprehensible—all stakeholders understand the purpose of the package Cohesive—the package addresses functions that are closely related to one another Loosely coupled—functions or classes within the package collaborate with one another, but collaboration outside the package are kept to a minimum. Hierarchically shallow—deep functional hierarchies are difficult to navigate and hard for end-users to understand; therefore, the number of levels within a use-case hierarchy should be minimized whenever possible. These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 6 The Content Model Content objects are extracted from use-cases examine the scenario description for direct and indirect references to content Attributes of each content object are identified The relationships among content objects and/or the hierarchy of content maintained by a WebApp Relationships—entity-relationship diagram or UML Hierarchy—data tree or UML These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 7 Data Tree Market ingDescript ion Phot ograph part Number part Name component part Type descript ion TechDescript ion Schemat ic Video price WholesalePrice Ret ailPrice Figure 1 8 .3 Dat a t ree for aSafeHom e c om ponent These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 8 Analysis Classes Analysis classes are derived by examining each use-case A grammatical parse is used to identify candidate classes A UML class diagram is developed for each analysis class These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 9 Analysis Class Example BillOfMat erials Product Component 1 ident ifier priceTot al part Number part Name part Ty pe descript ion price addEnt ry( ) delet eEnt ry( ) edit Ent ry( ) name( ) sav e( ) comput ePrice( ) creat eNewIt em( ) get Descript ion( ) get TechSpec 1 * * Sensor Camera Cont rolPanel Soft Feat ure BoMIt em quant it y price addt oList( ) delet efromList( ) Figure 18.4 Analysis classes f or use-case: select Saf eHome component s These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 10 The Interaction Model Composed of four elements: use-cases sequence diagrams state diagrams a user interface prototype Each of these is an important UML notation and has been described in Chapter 8 These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 11 Sequence Diagram :Room :FloorPlan :Product Component :Billof Mat erials FloorPlan Reposit ory BoM Reposit ory new cust o mer d e sc ri b e s ro o m * p l a c e s ro o m in f loor plan sa v e f l o o r p l a n c o n f i g u ra t i o n se l e c t s p ro d u c t c o m p o n e n t * a d d t o Bo M sa v e b i l l o f m a t e ri a l s Figure 18.5 Sequence diagram f or use-case:select Saf eHome component s These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 12 State Diagram Validat ing user select “log-in” Select ing user act ion userid validat ed syst em st at us=“input ready ” display msg = “ent eruserid” display msg =“ent er pswd” password v alidat ed n e w cu st o m e r ent ry / log-in request ed do: run user validat ion exit / set user access swit ch selec t ot her f unct ions sy st em st at us=“link ready” display : navigat ion choices” ent ry/ v alidat ed user do: link as required exit / user act ion select ed cust omiz at ion complet e select e-c ommerce (purchase) f unct ionalit y select cust omizat ion f unct ionalit y next select ion Cust omizing select descript iv e cont ent syst em st at us=“input ready ” display: basic inst ruct ions Def ining room room being def ined ent ry/ v alidat ed user do: process user select ion exit / cust omiz at ion t erminat ed select descript iv e cont ent Sav ing f loor plan syst em st at us=“input ready ” display: st orage indicat or ent ry/ f loor plan sav e select ed do: st ore f loor plan exit / save complet ed syst em st at us=“input ready” display: roomdef . window ent ry/ roomdef . select ed all rooms do: run room queries def ined do: st ore room v ariables exit / room complet ed select sav e f loor plan select ent er room in f loor plan Building f loor plan select descript ive cont ent sy st em st at us=“input ready” display : f loor plan window ent ry/ f loor plan select ed do: insert room in place do: st ore f loor plan v ariables exit / room insert ion complet ed room insert ion complet ed Figure 1 8 .6 Part ial st at e diagram f or n e w c u s t o m eint r eract ion These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 13 The Functional Model The functional model addresses two processing elements of the WebApp user observable functionality that is delivered by the WebApp to end-users the operations contained within analysis classes that implement behaviors associated with the class. An activity diagram can be used to represent processing flow These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 14 Activity Diagram init ialize t ot alCost no c omponent s remain onBoMList c omponent s remain on BoMList invoke calcShipping Cost ret urns: shipping Cost invoke det ermineDiscount ret urns: discount discount >0 g et price and quant it y lineCost = price x quant it y add lineCost t o t ot alCost t ot alCost= t ot alCost - discount discount < = 0 t axTot al= t ot alCost x t axrat e priceTot al = t ot alCost + t axTot al + shipping Cost Figure 1 8 .7 Act ivit y diagram f or c o m p u t e Pr i (c)e o p e r a t i o n These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 15 The Configuration Model Server-side Server hardware and operating system environment must be specified Interoperability considerations on the server-side must be considered Appropriate interfaces, communication protocols and related collaborative information must be specified Client-side Browser configuration issues must be identified Testing requirements should be defined These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 16 Relationship-Navigation Analysis Relationship-navigation analysis (RNA) identifies relationships among the elements uncovered as part of the creation of the analysis model Steps: Stakeholder analysis—identifies the various user categories and establishes an appropriate stakeholder hierarchy Element analysis—identifies the content objects and functional elements that are of interest to end users Relationship analysis—describes the relationships that exist among the WebApp elements Navigation analysis—examines how users might access individual elements or groups of elements Evaluation analysis—considers pragmatic issues (e.g., cost/benefit) associated with implementing the relationships defined earlier These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 17 Navigation Analysis-I Should certain elements be easier to reach (require fewer navigation steps) than others? What is the priority for presentation? Should certain elements be emphasized to force users to navigate in their direction? How should navigation errors be handled? Should navigation to related groups of elements be given priority over navigation to a specific element. Should navigation be accomplished via links, via search-based access, or by some other means? Should certain elements be presented to users based on the context of previous navigation actions? Should a navigation log be maintained for users? These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 18 Navigation Analysis-II Should a full navigation map or menu (as opposed to a single “back” link or directed pointer) be available at every point in a user’s interaction? Should navigation design be driven by the most commonly expected user behaviors or by the perceived importance of the defined WebApp elements? Can a user “store” hi rre ooss nvvigation throughtth WebApp to exped ee future usage? For which user category should optimal navigation be designed? How should links external to the WebApp be handled? overlaying the existing browser window? as a new browser window? as a separate frame? These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 19