Table 14.1. Landscape composition in a 81-ha window around... A B C

advertisement
Table 14.1. Landscape composition in a 81-ha window around selected study plots.
Plot
A
B
C
Total cells in window
Cells of old forest in
window
Percent old forest in
window
Table 14.2. Species list for three 0.5-ha plots. “1” indicates that the species was present in the
given plot; “0” indicates it was absent.
Species
Plot A
Plot B
Plot C
Galium aparine
1
1
1
Smilacina racemosa
1
1
1
Arisaema triphyllum
1
0
1
Sanguinaria candensis
0
1
1
Cimicifuga racemosa
1
1
1
Trillium rugelli
1
0
0
Polygonum persicaria
0
0
1
Polystichum acrostichoides
1
1
1
Asplenium platyneuron
1
0
1
Orchis spectabilis
1
0
0
Stellaria media
0
1
1
Viola rotundifolia
1
1
1
Geranium maculatum
1
1
0
Phlox stolonifera
1
0
1
Viola canadensis
1
1
0
Uvularia grandiflora
1
0
0
Disporum lanuginosum
1
0
0
Thalictrum clavatum
1
1
0
Prenanthes altissima
1
0
1
Panax quinquefolia
1
0
0
Total Species for Plot
Table 14.3. Herbaceous community composition in 80 study plots located in young forests. The
presence (1) or absence (0) of Galium aparine, Arisaema triphyllum, Viola canadensis, and
Disporum lanuginosum are indicated for each study plot. Forest patch size (ha) and percent of
old forest in landscape were measured from a land-cover map. Percent of old forest was
measured in a 81-ha window. These data are also contained in an Excel file called “context.xls”
on the CD.
Presence/Absence
Viola
Disporum Other Species Patch % Old
Study Galium Arisaema
Plot aparine triphyllum canadensis lanuginosum Species Richness Size Forest
1
1
1
0
0
8
10
43.2
2
2
1
1
0
0
7
9
29.4
6
3
1
0
0
0
5
6
23.7
4
4
1
1
0
0
4
6
12.3
5
5
1
1
0
0
5
7
15.5
9
6
0
0
0
0
3
3
7.3
2
7
1
1
0
0
8
10
40.8
2
8
1
1
0
0
7
9
24.4
8
9
1
0
0
0
5
6
16.1
6
10
1
1
0
0
3
5
10.2
1
11
1
0
0
0
4
5
18.0
1
12
1
1
0
0
5
7
23.2
3
13
1
1
0
0
4
6
17.2
0
14
1
0
0
0
3
4
5.7
6
15
1
1
0
0
8
10
36.0
8
16
1
0
0
0
7
8
28.6
7
17
1
1
0
0
5
7
22.8
1
18
1
1
0
0
5
7
18.5
5
19
1
1
0
0
7
9
23.7
9
20
1
1
0
0
5
7
19.1
4
21
1
1
0
0
8
10
19.0
16
22
0
1
0
0
12
13
20.2
33
23
0
0
0
0
12
12
30.9
26
24
1
1
0
0
11
13
32.4
20
25
1
1
0
0
16
18
44.8
32
26
1
0
0
0
12
13
15.7
36
27
1
1
0
0
12
14
23.9
31
28
1
0
0
0
11
12
13.3
30
29
1
0
0
0
15
16
36.9
33
30
0
1
0
0
9
10
26.9
16
31
1
1
0
0
10
12
2.3
35
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
11
17
13
14
10
8
17
15
7
13
22
15
22
18
19
16
15
16
20
23
16
17
18
14
18
20
16
20
16
30
28
20
31
25
21
26
26
27
22
26
32
12
19
15
16
12
9
19
17
9
15
25
18
24
20
22
19
18
18
23
26
17
20
21
17
20
21
20
21
19
32
30
23
34
26
25
29
28
29
24
29
34
7.5
44.2
23.2
38.1
3.6
16.0
48.1
36.4
20.7
10.8
44.4
18.6
43.9
27.6
23.9
26.2
5.9
9.1
36.6
48.1
16.2
16.1
34.3
18.1
36.2
24.8
32.9
36.0
2.4
45.3
20.7
8.9
45.3
12.1
13.8
15.6
6.2
46.4
8.4
42.4
50.0
36
37
33
30
33
20
34
34
13
42
57
45
59
51
57
45
53
56
54
60
51
55
47
42
45
59
41
55
59
87
94
71
91
89
70
92
95
75
78
76
93
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
26
22
28
28
21
29
21
23
28
23
32
32
23
31
25
27
40.5
29.6
40.7
25.2
13.8
27.8
6.8
21.4
77
65
84
93
70
94
75
74
Table 14.4. Species richness in patches with different landscape contexts.
Old forest in landscape
<10%
10-39%
40-60%
>60%
Mean
Standard deviation
95% Upper CI
95% Lower CI
Table 14.5. Life-history classification of four species, and hypotheses regarding the effects of
old-growth in the surrounding landscape neighborhood.
Species
Galium aparine
Arisaema triphyllum
Viola canadensis
Disporum lanuginosum
Habitat needs
Dispersal
ability
Hypothesis
Table 14.6. Contingency tables for four species.
Galium aparine
Percent old forest in landscape neighborhood
Status
<10%
10-39%
40-60%
>60%
Row Totals
Observed
Present
Expected
Observed
Absent
Expected
Column
Grand total:
Totals
Arisaema triphyllum
Percent old forest in landscape neighborhood
Status
<10%
10-39%
40-60%
>60%
Row Totals
Observed
Present
Expected
Observed
Absent
Expected
Column
Totals
Grand total:
Viola canadensis
Percent old forest in landscape neighborhood
Status
<10%
10-39%
40-60%
>60%
Row Totals
Observed
Present
Expected
Observed
Absent
Expected
Column
Grand total:
Totals
Disporum lanuginosum
Percent old forest in landscape neighborhood
Status
<10%
10-39%
40-60%
>60%
Row Totals
Observed
Present
Expected
Observed
Absent
Expected
Column
Totals
Grand total:
Table 14.7. Results of contingency table analyses.
Species
χ2 value
Statistical significance
Galium
aparine
Arisaema
triphyllum
Viola
canadensis
Disporum
lanuginosum
Download