The Isotopic Composition of Solar Nitrogen and the Frangois Robert*

advertisement

The Isotopic Composition of Solar Nitrogen and the

Heterogeneity of the Solar System

Ko Hashizume*^ Bernard Marty*, Marc Chaussidon* and

Frangois Robert*

11

*Centre de Recherches Petrographiques et Geochimiques, CNRS, Rue Notre-Dame des Pauvres, BP 20,

54501 Vandoeuvre Cedex, France

Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-043, Japan

^Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France

Abstract. The isotopic composition of solar nitrogen is a long standing issue that received recently new impetus.

The analysis of nitrogen isotopes in lunar samples and in Jupiter show that solar nitrogen is depleted in

15

N by 30 % relative to terrestrial. The systematic enrichment of

15

N in terrestrial planets and bulk meteorites requires the contribution of

15

N-rich compounds to the total nitrogen in planetary materials. Most of these compounds are possibly of an interstellar origin that never equilibrated with the

15

N-depleted protosolar nebula N

2

.

INTRODUCTION

The isotopic composition of nitrogen (

15

N/

14

N, expressed as (8

15

N = [(

15

N/

14

N) sample

/(

15

N/

14

N) air

-

1] x 1000, in parts per mil, or %o) is extremely variable among solar system objects such as meteorites, planetary atmospheres, interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) (e.g., [1,2] and refs. therein), see Fig. 1. Because nitrogen has only two isotopes, it is unclear if such variations are due to isotopic fractionation in the proto-solar nebula, or in the interstellar medium, or if they result from mixing of pre-solar components processed in different stars, or from a combination of such processes.

The basic problem with this element is that the isotopic composition of solar nitrogen, the main reservoir of N in the solar system, has not been measured directly with precision, preventing an assessment of the solar system reference value for

15

N/

14

N. We have recently proposed that solar N is drastically depleted in

15

N, based on newly developed analyses of lunar soils and we discuss briefly some of the implications of this isotope heterogeneity for the evolution of the solar system.

SOLAR NITROGEN

A direct determination of the solar wind nitrogen composition will be possible when samples having been exposed in space during the

14M/15N

220

E, metal ffiP-___

"CC

170

( > Earth

(Atm)

Jupiti ilileo

Jupiter ISO cc»"0— — — —

Cornet Hale-Bopj

•••••O"

Solar wind SOHO

-500 0 500 1000

FIGURE 1. Variation of 5

15

N in the solar system

Different types of chondrites (E, CR) are shown together with measurements of the atmosphere of Venus and of

Mars.

Genesis Discovery Mission will be returned to laboratories. Studies of the lunar regolith, which has been irradiated by the solar corpuscular emission for long periods of time, have allowed to identify and measure precisely the isotopic composition of solar wind rare gases (e.g., [3]), which agrees well with direct measurement of solar wind rare gases in aluminium foils exposed

CP598, Solar and Galactic Composition, edited by R. F. Wimmer-Schweingruber

© 2001 American Institute of Physics 0-7354-0042-3/017$ 18.00

41

on the Moon. The abundance of nitrogen (and carbon) of different soils correlates fairly well with that of rare gases, and this has been taken as a firm evidence for a solar origin of N.

However, the N/Ar ratio of lunar soils is on an average one order of magnitude higher than Solar, and the 8

15

N lunar soil values range over 300 %o

(e.g., [1] and refs. therein). These observations were interpreted following two different types of models, not necessarily exclusive : (i) the isotopic composition of nitrogen in solar emission varied with time [4], contrary to that of rare gases (e.g.,

[5]), or (ii) several exotic components contributed nitrogen to lunar soils [6]. The first possibility has been discarded by Geiss and Bochsler [6] on the ground that no known spallation or thermonuclear reaction could produce enough

15

N and these authors concluded that the N isotope ratio at the solar surface has been constant during the last 4 billion years. They instead proposed that variations of the

15

N/

14

N ratio is due to mixing between a

15

N-rich solar component and a very light N component admixed in various amount to planetary matter. The analysis of N abundance together with that of Ar isotopes in single lunar soil grains by laser extraction-static mass spectrometry developed in Nancy, France, showed that lunar soils contained two or more nitrogen components [7]. In such a case the overall correlation between N and rare gases in different soils does not imply a common origin but is due to the implantation at the grain surface of different N and Ar components. In addition to solar corpuscular radiation, possible candidates include meteoritic N since it has been shown that the lunar regolith contains 1-2 % of carbonaceous chondrite debris [8] and that some of lunar soil grains present vapor-deposited rims though to have originated from meteoritic impacts [9]. Primitive meteorites have N/Ar ratios 5 orders of magnitude higher than the solar value so a limited contribution of such material only be seen for nitrogen, leaving the solar rare gas component essentially unaltered. A cometary contribution would also be possible but such case would imply either contribution of cometary silicates, or preferential trapping of nitrogen relative to rare gases if these volatiles were supplied by cometary ice.

The occurrence of several N components was further confirmed when it became possible to determine also the N isotopic composition of single lunar soil grains [10, 11] for soil sampled at different sites. These analyses demonstrated that

£-100 e

-200

100001

100

10,

glOOO

Q.

Q.

•i-H

00

100 ffi

10

50 100 150

Depth nm

200

-200

+800

+400

Q

CO

-400

Grain 71501 (ilmenite)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ._

-800

1

50 100 150

Depth nm

200

FIGURE 2. Examples of depth profiles of N and H concentrations and isotope compositions (dots and squares for H and N, respectively) in grains from soil

79035 and soil 71501 (adapted fromref. [2]).

+800

+400

Q

CO

-400 l"l f, f i t

•I—I—I—I

Grain 79035 (silicate)

-800

42

solar wind nitrogen is not enriched in

15

N contrary to what was proposed by [6] since

15

N-rich grains are depleted in solar wind argon and S

15

N values become negative with increasing contribution of solar wind argon. A lower limit of - 200 %o for solar 8

15

N could be set based on 8

15

N-Ar/N relationships.

A new method of ion probe rastering analysis developed at CRPG, Nancy [12] allowed to measure the depth profile isotopic variation of H and N on soil grain surfaces with a depth resolution of 10 nm for two soils of different antiquities (the antiquity refers to the epoch at which a given soil was exposed at the Moon's surface, based on indirect, semi-quantitative soil characteristics).

Results [2] from soil 79035, a regolith presumably exposed for > 500 Ma, show that a light N component depleted in

15

N by at least 240

%o is implanted in the depth range of few tens of nanometers that corresponds to implantation of

SW ions. The light N component is associated with solar wind, D-free hydrogen (Fig. 2), confirming the suspicion from single grain analysis that solar wind N is strongly depleted in

15

N relative to planetary N.

Other measurements aimed to determine the solar N composition are sparse. Kallenbach et al.

[13] reported a 8

15

N value of 360

+520

.

290

%o for the present -day solar wind using the SOHO TOP mass spectrometer facility. Fouchet el al. (Icarus

143, 223, 2000) reported a range of -480

+240

.

28 o %o for ammonia in the Jovian atmosphere using the

ISO short wavelength spectrometer. Since the

N/C/Ar ratios of the Jupiter atmosphere are close to solar [14], the Jovian N isotopic composition should reflect closely that of the proto-solar nebula and the discrepancy between the two measurements may be analytical. Recently, the

Galileo team has published the results of the mass spectrometric measurements of N isotopes during the Jovian atmosphere entry and proposed a 8

15

N value of -375+/-80 %o for Jupiter [14], in good agreement with the Fouchet et al's determination and with the upper limit of -240 %o for solar wind nitrogen on the Moon proposed by Hashizume et al. [2].

Since Jupiter and comets have sampled protosolar N 4.5 Ga ago, and soil 79035 has been presumably exposed to the solar wind several hundreds of Ma ago, this would still leave space in principle for secular evolution of solar wind N towards a more positive 8

15

N value at present as proposed by [4]. We think that this is not the case, for the reasons exposed by [6] and because we have recently analyzed a Luna-24 soil showing evidence for recent exposition (notably a low

40

Ar/

36

Ar ratio of 0.5) which shows also depletion of

15

N with increasing solar wind

36

Ar contribution

[H].

EVIDENCE FOR N ISOTOPE

HETEROGENEITY IN THE SOLAR

SYSTEM

All solar system objects analyzed so far present enrichment in

15

N relative to solar and Jupiter (Fig.

1). Such enrichment could be in some cases the result of atmospheric processes (e.g., Mars and

Titan) but a contribution of

15

N-rich component(s) is needed for primitive objects as well as planetary interiors. Mixing between solar N and other(s) non-solar N source(s) is evident at the Moon's surface. Analysis of grains from soil 71501 which was presumably exposed recently [5] display a

15

N-rich component having deuterium-rich (nonsolar) hydrogen. Positive 8

15

N values were also found at the very surface of 71501 grains as well as grains and data taken together define a range of values for non-solar N between -50 and +130 %o

[2], essentially similar to that defining the upper limit of bulk soil spallation-corrected data (e.g.,

[1]). The depth profile analysis of major elements of 71501 ilmenite grains showed that the

15

N-rich component is associated with silicon coatings [2].

The association of Si-rich coatings with

15

N-rich nitrogen and D-rich hydrogen strongly suggests that such coatings originated from exotic material having impacted the Moon's surface. We can evaluate comets and meteorites as potential sources. The single existing cometary N isotope measurement was done on HCN in comet Hale-

Bopp [15] and gave a 8

15

N value of -157

+136

.

109

%o.

If representative of the cometary reservoir, this measurement would rule out comets as the unique source of non-solar N on the Moon.

Micrometeorites and meteorites are better candidates. The range of 8

15

N values observed in most meteorites bracket the terrestrial ratio (Fig. 1) and micrometeorites share similarities with the

CM carbonaceous chondrite clan which contains on an average 10

3

ppm of nitrogen with 8

15

N around +40 %o. Since heavier N is observed in the

Moon, other sources of N are required and IDPlike matter could fit since IDPs have 8

15

N values up to 480 %o [16]. In such case the secular N isotopic variations for soils having different antiquities reflect variations in the solar versus meteoritic/cometary contributions through time and would provide an unique way to investigate

43

the variability of meteoritic bombardment of the

Earth through geological time. Preliminary mass balance calculations are very encouraging with this respect as they show a good consistancy between the required metoritic flux on the Moon to account for N isotope variability in lunar regolith and the micrometeoritic flux estimated for the Earth (Hashizume et al., in prep.).

The systematic enrichment of

15

N in terrestrial planets and bulk meteorites requires the contribution of

15

N-rich compounds to the total nitrogen in planetary materials. Most of these compounds are possibly of an interstellar origin that never equilibrated with the

15

N-depleted protosolar nebula N

2

. Isotopic fractionation of nitrogen will enrich HCN in

15

N by up to 30% relative to N

2

following ion-molecule reactions in interstellar clouds, qualitatively consistent with the difference in

15

N/

14

N between solar and planetary

N.

The 8

15

N value at the Earth's surface

(atmosphere plus sediments plus crust) is + 1.5 %o and the upper mantle value is around - 5 %c. Thus terrestrial nitrogen does not show evidence of solar gas origin, contrary to mantle neon. Taken at face value, terrestrial nitrogen could have been supplied by both cometary- and meteorite-like matter, however the terrestrial D/H ratio rules out significant contribution from comets [17]. In addition, the volatile element pattern of the terrestrial mantle is chondritic [18], which leaves little doubt that nitrogen has been supplied to the

Earth under the form of meteoritic compounds rather than N

2

.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Discussions with Rainer Wieler, Paul Mahaffy,

John Kerridge, Kurt Marti, Richard Becker and

Toby Owen were greatly appreciated, although this work does not necessarily reflects the view of some of these scientists. This work was supported by grants from the Programme National de

Planetologie, Institut National des Sciences de

1'Univers, the Japanese Ministry of Education,

Science, Sports and Culture, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and the Region

Lorraine.

REFERENCES

1. Kerridge, J.F., Rev. Geophys. 31,423-437, (1993).

2. Hashizume, K., Chaussidon, M., Marty, B., and Robert, F.,

Science 290, 1142-1145 (2000).

3 Benkert, J.P., Baur, H., Signer, P., and Wieler, R., /.

Geophys. Res. 98, 13,147-13,162 (1993).

4 Kerridge, J.F., Science 188,162-164 (1975)

5 Wieler, R., and Baur, H., Meteoritics 29, 570-580 (1994).

6 Geiss, J., and Bochsler, P., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46,

529-548 (1982).

7 Wieler, R., Humbert, F., and Marty, B., Earth Planet. Sci.

Lett. 167,47-60 (1999).

8 Keays, R.R., Ganapathy, R., Laul, J.C., Anders, E.,

Herzog, G.F., and Jeffery, P.M., Science 167, 490-493

(1970).

9 Keller, L.P., and McKay, D.S., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

61,2331-2342(1997).

10 Hashizume, K., Marty, B., and Wieler, R., in LPS XXX

CD-ROM, pp. 1567, LPI, Houston (1999).

11 Assonov, S.S., Marty, B., Shukolyukov, Y.A., and

Semenova, A.S., in LPS XXXII, CD-ROM, pp. 1798, LPI,

Houston (2001).

12 Chaussidon, M., and Robert, F., Nature 402, 270-273

(1999).

13 Kallenbach, R., et al., Astrophys. J. 507, L185-L188

(1998).

14 Owen, T., Mahaffy, P.R., Niemann, H.B., Atreya, S., and

Wong, M., Astrophys. J. 553, L77-L79 (2001).

15 Jewitt, D.C., Matthews, H.E., Owen, T., and Meier, R.,

Science 278, 90-93 (1997).

16 Messenger, S., Nature 404, 968-971 (2000).

17 Dauphas, N., Robert, F., and Marty, B., Icarus 148, 508-

512(2000).

18 Marty, B., and Zimmermann, J.L., Geochim. Cosmochim.

Acta 63, 3619-3633 (1999).

44

Download