Report on Community Forums to Inform the Search for the Next Leader of the School District of Philadelphia Project for Civic Engagement SpecialthankstotheUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvania– JillM.Michal,PresidentandCEO,andAnnSchmieg,SeniorVice PresidentofCommunityImpact–fortheirsupportforthisproject. ProjectTeam HarrisSokoloff,Ph.D. Director PennProjectforCivicEngagement DianeCastelbuono AssociateVicePresidentofEducation UnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvania LindaBreitstein ProjectManager PennProjectforCivicEngagement Formoreinformation: Email: Harriss@gse.upenn.edu dcastelbuono@uwsepa.org Moderators PennProjectforCivicEngagement: ShakiraAbulAli EdMarshBattle JeffBranch JeandiSabatino TedEnoch LouiseGiuliano EllenGreenberg GermaineIngram GuillermoLopez,Jr. CarolLyden BryanMcHale FranneMcNeal EllenPetersen LoraineRaider KarenScott GwynneSmithScheffer TerrillThompson JoshWarner UnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvania: AshleyBrindisi MeaghanBrown IanCharlton AbbyEllis HarmonyElsley MaggieFlanagan NicoleFuller MaureenHiller SaxonNelson SuzanneO’Connor MartyMolloy AbbyMoskowitz MatthewMumber VonettaRobinson SteveRobishaw JennieSparandara SteveVassor HeatherWertz Mayor’sOfficeofEducation: TerryPittman I. Introduction: OnJanuary10,2012,theSuperintendentSearchCommitteeoftheSchoolReformCommission (SRC)proposedinitialcriteriaforthenextleaderoftheSchoolDistrictofPhiladelphia.TheSRC askedtheUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvaniaandthePennProjectforCivicEngagement tosolicitpubliccommentanddiscussionofthesecriteriatoinformthedeliberationsofthe SearchCommittee. Inresponse,theUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvaniaandtheProjectforCivic Engagementconductedaseriesofcommunityengagementforumstogatherdeliberativepublic inputfortheSearchCommittee.Tenoftheseeventswereopentothepublicandwereheldin neighborhoodhighschools–oneineachcitycouncildistrict.Sixeventswereinvitationonly, sponsoredbysixdifferentleadershipgroupsinthecity:theGreaterPhiladelphiaChamberof Commerce,EducationFirstCompact,YoungInvolvedPhiladelphia/PhillyCORELeaders,Charter SchoolsCEOs,faithͲbasedleadersandstudentleaders. Eachofthefifteenforumswasstructuredthesameway: x Openingpresentationofthesearchcontextandtheinitialcriteriabyamemberofthe SuperintendentSearchCommittee.(AcopyofthePowerPointpresentationthatwasused ineachoftheforumsisavailableathttp://www.gse.upenn.edu/pcel/programs/ppce.) x Smallgroupdiscussion,ledbytrainedfacilitatorsfromthePennProjectforCivic EngagementandtheUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvania,focusingonthree questions: o Whatabouttheseninecriteriamakessensetoyou?Why? o Whatabouttheseninecriteriaconcernsyou?Why? o Whatdifferencewoulditmakeifthesuccessfulcandidatewereorwerenot fromPhiladelphia?Why? x Inthoseforumswherethereweremultiplesmallgroups,weheldaclosingplenarysession whereparticipantsdiscussedpossiblecommonalitiesanddifferencestheynoticedacross smallgroupdiscussions. Morethan557peopleparticipatedintheseforums,thedate,locationofeachandthenumber ofparticipantsforeachforumislistedbelow: Wednesday,February1,2012:MasteryGratzHighSchool,60participants Thursday,February2,2012: EducationFirstCompactMeeting,45participants Saturday,February4,2012: RoxboroughHighSchool,26participants Saturday,February5,2012: LincolnHighSchool,19participants Monday,February6,2012: GreaterPhiladelphiaChamberofCommerce,30participants Monday,February6,2012: WestPhiladelphiaHighSchool,58participants Wednesday,February8,2012:StrawberryMansionHighSchool,22participants Thursday,February9,2012: EdisonHighSchool,17participants Monday,February13,2012: NortheastHighSchool,42participants ͳ FaithBasedLeadersForum1,40participants BartramHighSchool,29participants SouthPhiladelphiaHighSchool,33participants LeedsMiddleSchool,41participants YoungInvolvedPhiladelphians/PhillyCORELeadersForum, 39participants Wednesday,February22,2012: CharterSchoolCEOforum,24participants Thursday,February23,2012: PhiladelphiaYouthNetworkConvenedForum,32 participants Wednesday,February15,2012: Thursday,February16,2012: Saturday,February18,2012: Tuesday,February21,2012: Wednesday,February22,2012: Fromtheoutset,theSRCandSearchCommitteeagreedthatthecommunityengagement processwouldbetransparentinthefollowingways: x Notesfromeachsmallgroupdiscussionwouldbepostedontheweb,andbecomepartof thefinalcommunityengagementreportdeliveredtotheSRCandSearchCommittee. x Theconsolidatedreportcombiningtheworkfromeachforumwouldbepostedontheweb andbecomepartofthefinalcommunityengagementreportdeliveredtotheSRCand SearchCommittee. x TheSRCandSearchCommitteewouldrespondtothefinalreport,indicatingwhatthey heardfromthecommunityengagementprocess,whattheydidwithwhattheyheard,and why. Thisreportcompletesthefirstandsecondpartsofthatagreement.Thisfinalreportandreports fromeachoftheforumshavebeenpostedonthewebsiteofthePennProjectforCivic Engagementathttp://www.gse.upenn.edu/pcel/programs/ppce,withlinksfromthehome pageoftheUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvaniaathttp://www.uwsepa.org/,WHYY’s NewsWorksathttp://www.newsworks.org/andThePhiladelphiaSchoolNotebookat http://www.thenotebook.org/ Thereportthatfollowsisdividedintothreesections: x Thesummaryofthefindingsconcerningeachcriterionandwhetheritmattersifthe nextleaderisfromPhiladelphia. x Adiscussionofthemes–valuesͲbasedprinciplesthatemergedfromacrosstheforums. x Aconclusion. 1 TheforumwiththefaithͲbasedleaderswaspostponedattherequestoftheparticipants. ʹ 2. SummaryOfTheFindingsConcerningEachCriterionandWhetheritMattersiftheNext LeaderisfromPhiladelphia: Inthediscussionbelow,wesummarizethecommongroundsenseofeachcriterionthat emergedfromacrossallofthesmallgroupsfromthefifteenforumsthatwereheld.This “commonground”doesnotrepresentaconsensus.Rather,itrepresentstheideasand directionsthatemergedaspeopleacknowledgedtheiragreementsandworkedthroughtheir differencesastheycametounderstandeachotherandeachother’svaluesbetter.Differences ofopinionremain,butthecommongroundrepresentsagreementsonunderlyingvaluesand overlappinginterests,evenwhenparticipantsmaydisagreeonwhichactionswillgetusthere. Inthefirstsectionofthereport,wesummarizethosecommongroundareasforeachofthe nine(9)criteriaandthequestionofwhetheritmattersifthenextleaderisfromPhiladelphia, acknowledgingthatthereweredifferencesofopinion.Inthesecondsection,wereportonthe themesthatemergedacrossdifferences,includingtensionsandtradeͲoffsthatpeoplewere andwerenotwillingtomake. The“commonground”foreachofthenine(9)criteria: 1–Acommitmenttoeducationandanoverallpassiontoensurelearningforallchildren. Therewasclearagreementherethat“all”mustmean“allchildren”regardlessofrace, ethnicity,socioͲeconomicstatus,community,schooltypeorspecificlearningneed(e.g., specialeducation,Englishlanguagelearners,etc.). Withinthis,therewasbroadagreementthat“education”and“learning”mustrefertomore thantestscores.Therewasagreementthateducatingthewholechildispartofthekey here.Thiswouldincluderespondingtodiverselearningstylesandincludeattentiontothe “extras”suchasart,musicandsports. Importantly,therewasmorethanalittleconcernabouthowthesearchcommittee,SRC andcommunitymightknowthatacandidatehasthiscommitmentandthispassion;howto knowthiswasmorethanasloganorlipservicefromthecandidate.Theanswerwasclear: theywantsomeonewhohasatrackrecordthatdemonstratesthiscommitmentand passion. 2–KnowledgeandCapacitytorunalargeenterpriseororganization TherewasclearrecognitionthattheSchoolDistrictofPhiladelphiais,indeed,alargeand complexorganizationorenterprise.Assuchtherewassupportforthiscriteriaandthe needfortheleaderoftheDistricttohaveatrackrecordofeffectivenessinrunningalarge system/organization. Atthesametime,therewassignificantconcernthatthiscriterion(likesomeoftheothers) suggestsabusinessmodel.Insomegroups,participantsobjectedtotheword“enterprise,” arguingthattheschoolsystemisnotjust“anenterprise,”butan“educationalenterprise.” ͵ Afrequentrefrainwasthat“theDistrictisnotabusiness;it’saboutlearningandyoucan’t runitlikeabusinessbecauseit’saneducationalorganization.” Implicit,andattimesexplicit,wasaconcernthatthenextleadermustmakebusiness decisionswhilekeepingeducationalprioritiesatthecenterofthosedecisions.This,people seemedtorecognizeandagree,isadifficultbutnecessarybalancingact. 3–Aclearunderstandingofthewaymanagementdecisionsaffectteaching,trainingand leadershipdevelopmentamongprincipals Therewasgeneralagreementthatthiscriterionshouldbeaboutunderstandingtheways thatmanagementdecisionsaffectteachers,classroomsandschoolclimate(andtherefore students),aswellasprincipals.Participantsagreedthattheprincipaliskey,butthatthe nextleaderoftheSDPmustalsoattendtoprofessionaldevelopmentthroughoutthe system. Therewasalsoagreementthatprincipalsandschoolsneedautonomy,coupledwith discussionabouttheneedforthenextleadertosupportstrongprofessionaldevelopment forteachersandunderstandthewaysthatcentralofficedecisionsimpact/improve classrooms. Further,“understanding”isseenasgoingbeyondsomeacademicorevenpractical knowledge.Participantsarguedthateffectiverelationshipsandemotionalintelligencewill beasignificantfactorinalloftheabove. 4–AteamͲbuilderabletocoordinateandmotivateadiversegroupofmanagersandeducators ofdifferenttypesofschoolsindifferenttypesofsettings Whiletherewasstrongoverallsupportforthiscriterion,participantsalsohadsome significantconcerns.Thechiefconcernwasthatthe“team”thenextleaderwouldneedto buildmustincludethecommunitieswithinwhichschoolsoperate,fromwhichtheydraw theirstudents,andwithoutwhosesupportschoolscannotsucceed.Andthisincludesthe professionalandnonͲprofessionalstaffinschools. Theybelievethis“teamͲbuilder”mustdevelopstrongrelationshipsbylisteningto,reaching outtoandrespectingthediversecommunities,neighborhoodsandbusinessesacrossthe city.ItwillnotbeenoughforthenextleaderoftheSDPtoreachouttothosewholead differentkindsofschools–bothdistrictandnonͲdistrictschools.Rather,thenextleader willneedtobeinvolvedwithallconstituentstoengagethemandbuildabroadbaseof supportforthoseschools. 5–EmbracestheideaofaportfolioofschoolsandadvocatesforhighͲqualityschoolsregardless oftheprovider(districtorcharter) Participantshadmixedreactionstothiscriterion.Ontheonehand,someparticipantsliked theideathataportfolioapproachmightenabletheDistricttobuildonstrengthsandthat thismightimproveschools.Ontheotherhand,thiscriterion,alongwithcriterion#7below, Ͷ raisedthemostconcernamongthebroadrangeofparticipantsinthefifteenforums–from thoseintheneighborhoodstothosewholeadcharterschools. Inthecommunitiesweheardmorethanalittleconcernaboutthe“business”modelthatis impliedintheterm“portfolio.”Theconcernseemedtobethat“portfolio”connotesmore thanhavingdifferentkindsofschoolstomanage.Rather,itseemedtoconnotethatsome partsoftheportfoliowouldgetmoreinvestmentthanothers. Indeed,theideathatthiscriterionmightimplyaninequitabledistributionofresources cameupfrequently;forexample,that“chartersaresqueezingresourcesfromschool funding.” Anotherfrequentconcernwastheneedtoholdallschoolstothesamestandards.Charters must,someargued,beheldtothesamestandardsoftransparencyandstudent performanceasotherschools.OthersarguedthatnonͲcharterpublicschoolsshouldbe heldtothesamestandardscharterschoolsareheld,forexample,byclosingthosepublic schoolsthatdonotperformaswellascharterschools. Atthesametime,therewasagreementthatthenextleader,aswellasthepublicin general,understandthat“onesizedoesnotfitall”andthataninternal“portfolio”of schoolsisonewaytheSDPaddressesthatreality. 6–Arelationshipbuilderwhoisabletobuildcreativepartnershipwithnumerousexternal stakeholderstobringresourcestoindividualschoolsandgroupsofschools Participantswereclearthatpartnerships–bothinternalwithintheDistrictandexternal withabroadrangeofstakeholders–wouldbecrucialtoanysuccessthedistrictachieves particularlyinthesetighteconomictimes.InternalpartnershipsareessentialforbuyͲinand strengtheningpractice.Communitypartnershipsarekeytobuildingstrongercommunity supportforyouth.Corporateandbusinesspartnershipsarekeyforadditionalresources: human,physicalandfiscalresources. Atthesametime,therewasbroadrecognitionthattheDistricthasahistoryofbeing terribleatcultivatingsuchpartnerships.Districtpoliciesandpracticescreatebarrierstoall kindsofpartnerships.Equally,theDistrictandsomeprincipalsseemnottorecognizethe crucialrolethatschoolsplayindevelopingandbuildingcommunities,andtotheimportant rolethatparentsandotheradultsplayinthelivesofstudents.Participantsnotedthatthe nextleaderwillhavealotofworktodotofix/repairsome“burntbridges.” 7–Abilitytorethinkthedistrict'sservicemodel,movingclosertoautonomyforindividual schoolsanddecreasedcentralization Overalltherewascommongroundthatthiscriterionrecognizestheimportanceof addressingthespecificneedsofindividualschoolsandcommunities,thateachschooland principalmustaddresstheneedsofthestudentsinthatschool.Philadelphiais,people ͷ argued,acityofneighborhoods,andneighborhoodschoolsneedtoaddresstheneedsof thatcommunityandofthestudentsfromthatcommunity. Andtherewasbroadagreementthatschoolsarestrongestwhenthereisacapable principal,whenfundingresourcesareequitableacrossschools,andwhenthereis accountabilityattheschoollevel. Atthesametime,therewasbroadconcernthatdecentralizationandincreasedautonomy acrossschoolsmightincreaseinequitiesofresourcesandofresults.Autonomymight increasecompetitionforlimitedresources,increasinginequitiesacrossschoolsandperhaps evenwithinschoolsasdifferentprogramsinaschool(e.g.,specialeducation)vieforthose limitedresources. Thiswasparticularlyworrisomebecause,intheeyesofthoseparticipatingintheforums, notallprincipalshavetheknowledgeorexpertisetosucceedwithmoreautonomy.And participantswerenotsurehow,orwho,wouldmonitoraccountabilityinthoseandother areas. Participantswerealsoconcernedbecause“decentralization”hasbeentriedandabandoned beforeinPhiladelphia.Moreover,othersasked,whereistheresearchtosupport decentralization?Aretheresuccessfulurbanmodelsofdecentralization? 8–Abilitytoinfluencethepublic,businesscommunity,highereducationcommunity,and legislativeleadersonthevalueofpubliceducationandthecommitmentsnecessaryto achievenotableprogress Therewasbroadagreementwith,andsupportfor,thiscriterion.Acrossthespectrum, participantsthinkthenextleadermustbeanadvocateforpubliceducationwhileworking tobuildthecredibilityoftheSDP.Andparticipantsthoughtthatcredibilitywasnotjust abouttestscoresandmakingannualyearlyprogress(AYP).Credibilityisaboutbeinga cheerleaderforsuccessfulprogramswithineachschool,wheresuccessreferstoboth educationalprocessesandtheproductthatemergesfromthoseprocesses. Participantsalsoacknowledgedthatbeinga“systemchampion”withallofthestakeholders noted,aswellaswithinternalstakeholders,isimportanttobeingabletoincreasefiscaland otherresourcesforthedistrict. 9–Iscommittedtoactivelyengagingwithstudents,parentsandcommunitystakeholders Thiscriteriongeneratedsignificantdiscussion,andagreement.Therewasbroadcommon groundthatthiscommitmentisimportant,andevenbroadercommongroundthattheonly waytomeasurethiscommitmentisinatrackrecordofeffectivenessinengagingthefull rangeofstakeholdersproductively. Participantsintheforumsalsonotedthatthestakeholderslistedinthiscriterionshouldbe broader,includingthefamily,neighborhoodandsocialsystemthatstudentsrelyon.The nextleadermustdemonstratesensitivityto,andrespectfor,thediversityofstudentbody andparentsandothercareͲgivers/careͲtakers. DoesitmatterwhetherthenextleaderisfromPhiladelphia? Groupsweresplit,butnotdivisivelyso,onthisquestion,withaslightadvantageontheside ofthosearguingthatthenextleadershouldbefromPhiladelphia. Allagreedthattheskillset–expertise,experience,understandingofeducationandof runningacomplexorganization,particularlyinanurbansetting–wasthemostimportant. Peopleacknowledgedthat“talentistalent”andthatthey“wantthebestperson.” Beyondthat,peoplereasonedthatthenextleaderunderstandandvaluePhiladelphia,its cultureandthevaluesofresidents.Thenextleadermustvaluethecity’sneighborhoods anddiversityaswellaswhatsomereferredtoasthe“territorialismandinsularity”of neighborhoods,andthatPhiladelphiaͲspecificstrategiesmightbenecessarytobuildon localstrengthsandaddresslocalchallenges. Itwasalsoconsideredimportantthatthenextleaderunderstandwhatcurrentlyworkshere andwhathasbeensuccessful,andbuildonthat. Thereiscommongroundontheconcernthatthenextleaderwillhaveasteeplearning curvere:socialcapital,history,cultureofneighborhoods,resourcesandthepositivehistory ofeducationinnovation.Thisservedasacommonreasonforthosewhoarguedthatthe nextleadershouldhaverootsinPhiladelphia. 3. Themes/valuesͲbasedprinciplesthatemergedfromacrosstheforums. Severalthemesemergedasparticipantsworkedtheirwaythrough,aroundandintothe ninecriteria.Thosethemesaredescribedbrieflybelow. x Evenbusinessdecisionsmustbemadeforeducationreasons Mostoftheparticipantsseemedtounderstandtheeconomicrealitiesfacingthedistrict. Andtheyunderstandtheneedforresponsiblefiscalstewardshipandaccountability.At thesametime,theydon’twantthedistrict“runlikeabusiness.”Businessdecisions have,theyseemedtoreason,tobemadewithclearunderstandingoftheimpactof thosedecisionsonlearnersandthelearningenvironment.Andtheywantthe educationalrationaleforthosedecisionstobeexplicit.Don’t,inotherwords,justmake cuts,butbeclearhowthosecutswillimpactstudentsand,incaseswheretradeͲoffs weremade,explainhowandwhythosetradeͲoffsweremade. x Decentralizeforautonomyandcreativity,butretaincentralizationforequity Whiletherewassignificantsupportforgivingmoreautonomyandresponsibilityto schoolprincipals,therewaswidespreadconcernthatdecentralizationwouldleadto exacerbatingcurrentinequitiesacrossschools,wouldincreasecompetitionforlimited resourcesacrossschools,andwouldfailunlesstherewasawaytoensureschool principalsgotthetrainingandothersupportstheyneedtosucceed.Thissametraining wouldhelpthoseprincipalsaddorstrengthentheprogramsmostneededintheir particularsettings. x Transparency,honestyandopennesswillbuildsupportamongallstakeholders There’sapalpablesensethatpeoplebelievethedistrictislikeablackholeintowhich peoplesenergiesandideasgoandoutofwhichcomesverylittle,ifanything,inreturn. Thiswasclearwhenpeoplewouldsay“Idon’twanttocometoanothermeetingwhere wegiveourideas,someonewritesthemonflipchartpaper,andnothinghappens.”It wasalsoclearwhenpeoplesaid,“Idon’tthinkthisprocessisreal.TheSRCalready knowswhoitwants.”Suchpeoplearewaryofgivinginputandofsupportingan organizationthatisopaque,closedandseemsdrivenbyhiddenagendas.They’drather besupporters,butneedevidencethattheirengagementmakesadifference. Transparency,honestyandopennesswouldprovidethatevidence. x Engageus,allofus,forcollaborativeactionwithallstakeholders. Therewasaclearsensethatparticipants–fromstudentsandstafftocommunity membersto“YoungInvolvedPhiladelphians”tothebusinesscommunity–wanttobe seenaspotentialpartnersinmakingschoolsworkforallinthecity.Theysee themselvesaspartners;notsilentpartners,butpartnerswithphysicalandsocialcapital toofferinsupportofschoolimprovementandstudentachievement.Theywanttobe engagedinthatworkandwantthedistricttoreachouttothemandtomakeiteasyfor themtoreachouttoandworkwithschoolsandstudents. ͺ x x Asonepartofthis,therewasnoappetiteforsomeonewhowouldcomeherewitha clearplanforhowtochangethedistrict.Buttherewasstrongsupportforsomeonewho wouldcomeinwithabackgroundandstructureforhowtocollaboratewithall stakeholderstolearnaboutcurrentstrengthsandtodevelopcollaborativeplansfor districtimprovement. Ateam,notasingleleader Overandovertherewasacommonrefrain:thisjobistoobigforoneperson.Wedon’t wantasuperstarwhowilltryanddoitalone.Weneedsomeonewhocanbuildateam; ateamwhosemembersbringexpertisetheleaderdoesnothave;whosemembersare alsocommittedtoPhiladelphiaandwhocanworktogethersothattheteamisgreater thatanyofitsmembers.Asonecharterschoolleadersaid:thenextleadershouldcome herewithastrongsense–perhapsevenaplaybook–ofhowthatteamwillbe constructedandsomeideasofwhowillfilleachrole. It’saboutthisjob. Whenpeoplespokeaboutwhetherornotitmatteredifthenextleaderwerefrom Philadelphia,manyoftheirresponsesincludedthenotionthattheywantthenext leadertobe“vestedinthesuccess”ofthedistrict.Theywantsomeoneforwhomthis jobismorethanoneofastringofsuperintendenciesorCEOpositions.Rather,they wantsomeonewhowantstobehere,notjustinalargeurbanschooldistrict;someone forwhomPhiladelphiameanssomethingpersonal,andwhohasapersonalstakeinthe successofthestudents. ͻ 4. Conclusion: WewouldliketothanktheSRCandSearchCommitteefortheopportunitytosupportthem andtheschooldistrictintheireffortstolearnfromthebroadrangeofstakeholdersthat makeupthecommunityfortheSchoolDistrictofPhiladelphia.TheUnitedWayof SoutheasternPennsylvaniaandtheUniversityofPennsylvaniagreatlyappreciatethe opportunitytocreateacommunityengagementprocessthatincludedabroadrangeof stakeholdersfromacrossthecityinmeaningfuldeliberations.Togetherwewereableto createanopenandtransparentprocess;aprocessthatenabledustotapintothepassion andcreativeenergyofthosestakeholders.Throughouttheprocess,wehavebeen impressedbythequalityofstakeholderinterestandseeitasaclearindicationthatpeople caredeeplyabouttheirpublicschools.Webelievethatpassion,concernandcreativityare deepresourcesuponwhichtheSRC,SearchCommitteeandtheSchoolDistrictcandrawin theireffortstobestserveallofthechildrenintheCity. ͳͲ