Report on Community Forums to Inform the Search for the

advertisement
Report on Community Forums
to Inform the Search for the
Next Leader of the
School District of Philadelphia
Project for Civic Engagement
SpecialthankstotheUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvania––
JillM.Michal,PresidentandCEO,andAnnSchmieg,SeniorVice
PresidentofCommunityImpact––fortheirsupportforthisproject.
ProjectTeam
HarrisSokoloff,Ph.D.
Director
PennProjectforCivicEngagement
DianeCastelbuono
AssociateVicePresidentofEducation
UnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvania
LindaBreitstein
ProjectManager
PennProjectforCivicEngagement
Formoreinformation:
Email: Harriss@gse.upenn.edu
dcastelbuono@uwsepa.org
Moderators
PennProjectforCivicEngagement:
ShakiraAbulAli
EdMarshBattle
JeffBranch
JeandiSabatino
TedEnoch
LouiseGiuliano
EllenGreenberg
GermaineIngram
GuillermoLopez,Jr.
CarolLyden
BryanMcHale
FranneMcNeal
EllenPetersen
LoraineRaider
KarenScott
GwynneSmithScheffer
TerrillThompson
JoshWarner
UnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvania:
AshleyBrindisi
MeaghanBrown
IanCharlton
AbbyEllis
HarmonyElsley
MaggieFlanagan
NicoleFuller
MaureenHiller
SaxonNelson
SuzanneO’’Connor
MartyMolloy
AbbyMoskowitz
MatthewMumber
VonettaRobinson
SteveRobishaw
JennieSparandara
SteveVassor
HeatherWertz
Mayor’’sOfficeofEducation:
TerryPittman
I. Introduction:
OnJanuary10,2012,theSuperintendentSearchCommitteeoftheSchoolReformCommission
(SRC)proposedinitialcriteriaforthenextleaderoftheSchoolDistrictofPhiladelphia.TheSRC
askedtheUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvaniaandthePennProjectforCivicEngagement
tosolicitpubliccommentanddiscussionofthesecriteriatoinformthedeliberationsofthe
SearchCommittee.
Inresponse,theUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvaniaandtheProjectforCivic
Engagementconductedaseriesofcommunityengagementforumstogatherdeliberativepublic
inputfortheSearchCommittee.Tenoftheseeventswereopentothepublicandwereheldin
neighborhoodhighschools––oneineachcitycouncildistrict.Sixeventswereinvitationonly,
sponsoredbysixdifferentleadershipgroupsinthecity:theGreaterPhiladelphiaChamberof
Commerce,EducationFirstCompact,YoungInvolvedPhiladelphia/PhillyCORELeaders,Charter
SchoolsCEOs,faithͲbasedleadersandstudentleaders.
Eachofthefifteenforumswasstructuredthesameway:
x Openingpresentationofthesearchcontextandtheinitialcriteriabyamemberofthe
SuperintendentSearchCommittee.(AcopyofthePowerPointpresentationthatwasused
ineachoftheforumsisavailableathttp://www.gse.upenn.edu/pcel/programs/ppce.)
x Smallgroupdiscussion,ledbytrainedfacilitatorsfromthePennProjectforCivic
EngagementandtheUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvania,focusingonthree
questions:
o Whatabouttheseninecriteriamakessensetoyou?Why?
o Whatabouttheseninecriteriaconcernsyou?Why?
o Whatdifferencewoulditmakeifthesuccessfulcandidatewereorwerenot
fromPhiladelphia?Why?
x Inthoseforumswherethereweremultiplesmallgroups,weheldaclosingplenarysession
whereparticipantsdiscussedpossiblecommonalitiesanddifferencestheynoticedacross
smallgroupdiscussions.
Morethan557peopleparticipatedintheseforums,thedate,locationofeachandthenumber
ofparticipantsforeachforumislistedbelow:
Wednesday,February1,2012:MasteryGratzHighSchool,60participants
Thursday,February2,2012: EducationFirstCompactMeeting,45participants
Saturday,February4,2012: RoxboroughHighSchool,26participants
Saturday,February5,2012: LincolnHighSchool,19participants
Monday,February6,2012: GreaterPhiladelphiaChamberofCommerce,30participants
Monday,February6,2012: WestPhiladelphiaHighSchool,58participants
Wednesday,February8,2012:StrawberryMansionHighSchool,22participants
Thursday,February9,2012: EdisonHighSchool,17participants
Monday,February13,2012: NortheastHighSchool,42participants
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
ͳ
FaithBasedLeadersForum1,40participants
BartramHighSchool,29participants
SouthPhiladelphiaHighSchool,33participants
LeedsMiddleSchool,41participants
YoungInvolvedPhiladelphians/PhillyCORELeadersForum,
39participants
Wednesday,February22,2012: CharterSchoolCEOforum,24participants
Thursday,February23,2012: PhiladelphiaYouthNetworkConvenedForum,32
participants
Wednesday,February15,2012:
Thursday,February16,2012: Saturday,February18,2012: Tuesday,February21,2012: Wednesday,February22,2012:
Fromtheoutset,theSRCandSearchCommitteeagreedthatthecommunityengagement
processwouldbetransparentinthefollowingways:
x Notesfromeachsmallgroupdiscussionwouldbepostedontheweb,andbecomepartof
thefinalcommunityengagementreportdeliveredtotheSRCandSearchCommittee.
x Theconsolidatedreportcombiningtheworkfromeachforumwouldbepostedontheweb
andbecomepartofthefinalcommunityengagementreportdeliveredtotheSRCand
SearchCommittee.
x TheSRCandSearchCommitteewouldrespondtothefinalreport,indicatingwhatthey
heardfromthecommunityengagementprocess,whattheydidwithwhattheyheard,and
why.
Thisreportcompletesthefirstandsecondpartsofthatagreement.Thisfinalreportandreports
fromeachoftheforumshavebeenpostedonthewebsiteofthePennProjectforCivic
Engagementathttp://www.gse.upenn.edu/pcel/programs/ppce,withlinksfromthehome
pageoftheUnitedWayofSoutheasternPennsylvaniaathttp://www.uwsepa.org/,WHYY’’s
NewsWorksathttp://www.newsworks.org/andThePhiladelphiaSchoolNotebookat
http://www.thenotebook.org/
Thereportthatfollowsisdividedintothreesections:
x Thesummaryofthefindingsconcerningeachcriterionandwhetheritmattersifthe
nextleaderisfromPhiladelphia.
x Adiscussionofthemes––valuesͲbasedprinciplesthatemergedfromacrosstheforums.
x Aconclusion.
1
TheforumwiththefaithͲbasedleaderswaspostponedattherequestoftheparticipants.
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
ʹ
2. SummaryOfTheFindingsConcerningEachCriterionandWhetheritMattersiftheNext
LeaderisfromPhiladelphia:
Inthediscussionbelow,wesummarizethecommongroundsenseofeachcriterionthat
emergedfromacrossallofthesmallgroupsfromthefifteenforumsthatwereheld.This
““commonground””doesnotrepresentaconsensus.Rather,itrepresentstheideasand
directionsthatemergedaspeopleacknowledgedtheiragreementsandworkedthroughtheir
differencesastheycametounderstandeachotherandeachother’’svaluesbetter.Differences
ofopinionremain,butthecommongroundrepresentsagreementsonunderlyingvaluesand
overlappinginterests,evenwhenparticipantsmaydisagreeonwhichactionswillgetusthere.
Inthefirstsectionofthereport,wesummarizethosecommongroundareasforeachofthe
nine(9)criteriaandthequestionofwhetheritmattersifthenextleaderisfromPhiladelphia,
acknowledgingthatthereweredifferencesofopinion.Inthesecondsection,wereportonthe
themesthatemergedacrossdifferences,includingtensionsandtradeͲoffsthatpeoplewere
andwerenotwillingtomake.
The““commonground””foreachofthenine(9)criteria:
1––Acommitmenttoeducationandanoverallpassiontoensurelearningforallchildren.
Therewasclearagreementherethat““all””mustmean““allchildren””regardlessofrace,
ethnicity,socioͲeconomicstatus,community,schooltypeorspecificlearningneed(e.g.,
specialeducation,Englishlanguagelearners,etc.).
Withinthis,therewasbroadagreementthat““education””and““learning””mustrefertomore
thantestscores.Therewasagreementthateducatingthewholechildispartofthekey
here.Thiswouldincluderespondingtodiverselearningstylesandincludeattentiontothe
““extras””suchasart,musicandsports.
Importantly,therewasmorethanalittleconcernabouthowthesearchcommittee,SRC
andcommunitymightknowthatacandidatehasthiscommitmentandthispassion;howto
knowthiswasmorethanasloganorlipservicefromthecandidate.Theanswerwasclear:
theywantsomeonewhohasatrackrecordthatdemonstratesthiscommitmentand
passion.
2––KnowledgeandCapacitytorunalargeenterpriseororganization
TherewasclearrecognitionthattheSchoolDistrictofPhiladelphiais,indeed,alargeand
complexorganizationorenterprise.Assuchtherewassupportforthiscriteriaandthe
needfortheleaderoftheDistricttohaveatrackrecordofeffectivenessinrunningalarge
system/organization.
Atthesametime,therewassignificantconcernthatthiscriterion(likesomeoftheothers)
suggestsabusinessmodel.Insomegroups,participantsobjectedtotheword““enterprise,””
arguingthattheschoolsystemisnotjust““anenterprise,””butan““educationalenterprise.””
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
͵
Afrequentrefrainwasthat““theDistrictisnotabusiness;it’’saboutlearningandyoucan’’t
runitlikeabusinessbecauseit’’saneducationalorganization.””
Implicit,andattimesexplicit,wasaconcernthatthenextleadermustmakebusiness
decisionswhilekeepingeducationalprioritiesatthecenterofthosedecisions.This,people
seemedtorecognizeandagree,isadifficultbutnecessarybalancingact.
3––Aclearunderstandingofthewaymanagementdecisionsaffectteaching,trainingand
leadershipdevelopmentamongprincipals
Therewasgeneralagreementthatthiscriterionshouldbeaboutunderstandingtheways
thatmanagementdecisionsaffectteachers,classroomsandschoolclimate(andtherefore
students),aswellasprincipals.Participantsagreedthattheprincipaliskey,butthatthe
nextleaderoftheSDPmustalsoattendtoprofessionaldevelopmentthroughoutthe
system.
Therewasalsoagreementthatprincipalsandschoolsneedautonomy,coupledwith
discussionabouttheneedforthenextleadertosupportstrongprofessionaldevelopment
forteachersandunderstandthewaysthatcentralofficedecisionsimpact/improve
classrooms.
Further,““understanding””isseenasgoingbeyondsomeacademicorevenpractical
knowledge.Participantsarguedthateffectiverelationshipsandemotionalintelligencewill
beasignificantfactorinalloftheabove.
4––AteamͲbuilderabletocoordinateandmotivateadiversegroupofmanagersandeducators
ofdifferenttypesofschoolsindifferenttypesofsettings
Whiletherewasstrongoverallsupportforthiscriterion,participantsalsohadsome
significantconcerns.Thechiefconcernwasthatthe““team””thenextleaderwouldneedto
buildmustincludethecommunitieswithinwhichschoolsoperate,fromwhichtheydraw
theirstudents,andwithoutwhosesupportschoolscannotsucceed.Andthisincludesthe
professionalandnonͲprofessionalstaffinschools.
Theybelievethis““teamͲbuilder””mustdevelopstrongrelationshipsbylisteningto,reaching
outtoandrespectingthediversecommunities,neighborhoodsandbusinessesacrossthe
city.ItwillnotbeenoughforthenextleaderoftheSDPtoreachouttothosewholead
differentkindsofschools––bothdistrictandnonͲdistrictschools.Rather,thenextleader
willneedtobeinvolvedwithallconstituentstoengagethemandbuildabroadbaseof
supportforthoseschools.
5––EmbracestheideaofaportfolioofschoolsandadvocatesforhighͲqualityschoolsregardless
oftheprovider(districtorcharter)
Participantshadmixedreactionstothiscriterion.Ontheonehand,someparticipantsliked
theideathataportfolioapproachmightenabletheDistricttobuildonstrengthsandthat
thismightimproveschools.Ontheotherhand,thiscriterion,alongwithcriterion#7below,
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
Ͷ
raisedthemostconcernamongthebroadrangeofparticipantsinthefifteenforums––from
thoseintheneighborhoodstothosewholeadcharterschools.
Inthecommunitiesweheardmorethanalittleconcernaboutthe““business””modelthatis
impliedintheterm““portfolio.””Theconcernseemedtobethat““portfolio””connotesmore
thanhavingdifferentkindsofschoolstomanage.Rather,itseemedtoconnotethatsome
partsoftheportfoliowouldgetmoreinvestmentthanothers.
Indeed,theideathatthiscriterionmightimplyaninequitabledistributionofresources
cameupfrequently;forexample,that““chartersaresqueezingresourcesfromschool
funding.””
Anotherfrequentconcernwastheneedtoholdallschoolstothesamestandards.Charters
must,someargued,beheldtothesamestandardsoftransparencyandstudent
performanceasotherschools.OthersarguedthatnonͲcharterpublicschoolsshouldbe
heldtothesamestandardscharterschoolsareheld,forexample,byclosingthosepublic
schoolsthatdonotperformaswellascharterschools.
Atthesametime,therewasagreementthatthenextleader,aswellasthepublicin
general,understandthat““onesizedoesnotfitall””andthataninternal““portfolio””of
schoolsisonewaytheSDPaddressesthatreality.
6––Arelationshipbuilderwhoisabletobuildcreativepartnershipwithnumerousexternal
stakeholderstobringresourcestoindividualschoolsandgroupsofschools
Participantswereclearthatpartnerships––bothinternalwithintheDistrictandexternal
withabroadrangeofstakeholders––wouldbecrucialtoanysuccessthedistrictachieves
particularlyinthesetighteconomictimes.InternalpartnershipsareessentialforbuyͲinand
strengtheningpractice.Communitypartnershipsarekeytobuildingstrongercommunity
supportforyouth.Corporateandbusinesspartnershipsarekeyforadditionalresources:
human,physicalandfiscalresources.
Atthesametime,therewasbroadrecognitionthattheDistricthasahistoryofbeing
terribleatcultivatingsuchpartnerships.Districtpoliciesandpracticescreatebarrierstoall
kindsofpartnerships.Equally,theDistrictandsomeprincipalsseemnottorecognizethe
crucialrolethatschoolsplayindevelopingandbuildingcommunities,andtotheimportant
rolethatparentsandotheradultsplayinthelivesofstudents.Participantsnotedthatthe
nextleaderwillhavealotofworktodotofix/repairsome““burntbridges.””
7––Abilitytorethinkthedistrict'sservicemodel,movingclosertoautonomyforindividual
schoolsanddecreasedcentralization
Overalltherewascommongroundthatthiscriterionrecognizestheimportanceof
addressingthespecificneedsofindividualschoolsandcommunities,thateachschooland
principalmustaddresstheneedsofthestudentsinthatschool.Philadelphiais,people
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
ͷ
argued,acityofneighborhoods,andneighborhoodschoolsneedtoaddresstheneedsof
thatcommunityandofthestudentsfromthatcommunity.
Andtherewasbroadagreementthatschoolsarestrongestwhenthereisacapable
principal,whenfundingresourcesareequitableacrossschools,andwhenthereis
accountabilityattheschoollevel.
Atthesametime,therewasbroadconcernthatdecentralizationandincreasedautonomy
acrossschoolsmightincreaseinequitiesofresourcesandofresults.Autonomymight
increasecompetitionforlimitedresources,increasinginequitiesacrossschoolsandperhaps
evenwithinschoolsasdifferentprogramsinaschool(e.g.,specialeducation)vieforthose
limitedresources.
Thiswasparticularlyworrisomebecause,intheeyesofthoseparticipatingintheforums,
notallprincipalshavetheknowledgeorexpertisetosucceedwithmoreautonomy.And
participantswerenotsurehow,orwho,wouldmonitoraccountabilityinthoseandother
areas.
Participantswerealsoconcernedbecause““decentralization””hasbeentriedandabandoned
beforeinPhiladelphia.Moreover,othersasked,whereistheresearchtosupport
decentralization?Aretheresuccessfulurbanmodelsofdecentralization?
8––Abilitytoinfluencethepublic,businesscommunity,highereducationcommunity,and
legislativeleadersonthevalueofpubliceducationandthecommitmentsnecessaryto
achievenotableprogress
Therewasbroadagreementwith,andsupportfor,thiscriterion.Acrossthespectrum,
participantsthinkthenextleadermustbeanadvocateforpubliceducationwhileworking
tobuildthecredibilityoftheSDP.Andparticipantsthoughtthatcredibilitywasnotjust
abouttestscoresandmakingannualyearlyprogress(AYP).Credibilityisaboutbeinga
cheerleaderforsuccessfulprogramswithineachschool,wheresuccessreferstoboth
educationalprocessesandtheproductthatemergesfromthoseprocesses.
Participantsalsoacknowledgedthatbeinga““systemchampion””withallofthestakeholders
noted,aswellaswithinternalstakeholders,isimportanttobeingabletoincreasefiscaland
otherresourcesforthedistrict.
9––Iscommittedtoactivelyengagingwithstudents,parentsandcommunitystakeholders
Thiscriteriongeneratedsignificantdiscussion,andagreement.Therewasbroadcommon
groundthatthiscommitmentisimportant,andevenbroadercommongroundthattheonly
waytomeasurethiscommitmentisinatrackrecordofeffectivenessinengagingthefull
rangeofstakeholdersproductively.
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
͸
Participantsintheforumsalsonotedthatthestakeholderslistedinthiscriterionshouldbe
broader,includingthefamily,neighborhoodandsocialsystemthatstudentsrelyon.The
nextleadermustdemonstratesensitivityto,andrespectfor,thediversityofstudentbody
andparentsandothercareͲgivers/careͲtakers.
DoesitmatterwhetherthenextleaderisfromPhiladelphia?
Groupsweresplit,butnotdivisivelyso,onthisquestion,withaslightadvantageontheside
ofthosearguingthatthenextleadershouldbefromPhiladelphia.
Allagreedthattheskillset––expertise,experience,understandingofeducationandof
runningacomplexorganization,particularlyinanurbansetting––wasthemostimportant.
Peopleacknowledgedthat““talentistalent””andthatthey““wantthebestperson.””
Beyondthat,peoplereasonedthatthenextleaderunderstandandvaluePhiladelphia,its
cultureandthevaluesofresidents.Thenextleadermustvaluethecity’’sneighborhoods
anddiversityaswellaswhatsomereferredtoasthe““territorialismandinsularity””of
neighborhoods,andthatPhiladelphiaͲspecificstrategiesmightbenecessarytobuildon
localstrengthsandaddresslocalchallenges.
Itwasalsoconsideredimportantthatthenextleaderunderstandwhatcurrentlyworkshere
andwhathasbeensuccessful,andbuildonthat.
Thereiscommongroundontheconcernthatthenextleaderwillhaveasteeplearning
curvere:socialcapital,history,cultureofneighborhoods,resourcesandthepositivehistory
ofeducationinnovation.Thisservedasacommonreasonforthosewhoarguedthatthe
nextleadershouldhaverootsinPhiladelphia.
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
͹
3. Themes/valuesͲbasedprinciplesthatemergedfromacrosstheforums.
Severalthemesemergedasparticipantsworkedtheirwaythrough,aroundandintothe
ninecriteria.Thosethemesaredescribedbrieflybelow.
x Evenbusinessdecisionsmustbemadeforeducationreasons
Mostoftheparticipantsseemedtounderstandtheeconomicrealitiesfacingthedistrict.
Andtheyunderstandtheneedforresponsiblefiscalstewardshipandaccountability.At
thesametime,theydon’’twantthedistrict““runlikeabusiness.””Businessdecisions
have,theyseemedtoreason,tobemadewithclearunderstandingoftheimpactof
thosedecisionsonlearnersandthelearningenvironment.Andtheywantthe
educationalrationaleforthosedecisionstobeexplicit.Don’’t,inotherwords,justmake
cuts,butbeclearhowthosecutswillimpactstudentsand,incaseswheretradeͲoffs
weremade,explainhowandwhythosetradeͲoffsweremade.
x Decentralizeforautonomyandcreativity,butretaincentralizationforequity
Whiletherewassignificantsupportforgivingmoreautonomyandresponsibilityto
schoolprincipals,therewaswidespreadconcernthatdecentralizationwouldleadto
exacerbatingcurrentinequitiesacrossschools,wouldincreasecompetitionforlimited
resourcesacrossschools,andwouldfailunlesstherewasawaytoensureschool
principalsgotthetrainingandothersupportstheyneedtosucceed.Thissametraining
wouldhelpthoseprincipalsaddorstrengthentheprogramsmostneededintheir
particularsettings.
x Transparency,honestyandopennesswillbuildsupportamongallstakeholders
There’’sapalpablesensethatpeoplebelievethedistrictislikeablackholeintowhich
peoplesenergiesandideasgoandoutofwhichcomesverylittle,ifanything,inreturn.
Thiswasclearwhenpeoplewouldsay““Idon’’twanttocometoanothermeetingwhere
wegiveourideas,someonewritesthemonflipchartpaper,andnothinghappens.””It
wasalsoclearwhenpeoplesaid,““Idon’’tthinkthisprocessisreal.TheSRCalready
knowswhoitwants.””Suchpeoplearewaryofgivinginputandofsupportingan
organizationthatisopaque,closedandseemsdrivenbyhiddenagendas.They’’drather
besupporters,butneedevidencethattheirengagementmakesadifference.
Transparency,honestyandopennesswouldprovidethatevidence.
x Engageus,allofus,forcollaborativeactionwithallstakeholders.
Therewasaclearsensethatparticipants––fromstudentsandstafftocommunity
membersto““YoungInvolvedPhiladelphians””tothebusinesscommunity––wanttobe
seenaspotentialpartnersinmakingschoolsworkforallinthecity.Theysee
themselvesaspartners;notsilentpartners,butpartnerswithphysicalandsocialcapital
toofferinsupportofschoolimprovementandstudentachievement.Theywanttobe
engagedinthatworkandwantthedistricttoreachouttothemandtomakeiteasyfor
themtoreachouttoandworkwithschoolsandstudents.
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
ͺ
x
x
Asonepartofthis,therewasnoappetiteforsomeonewhowouldcomeherewitha
clearplanforhowtochangethedistrict.Buttherewasstrongsupportforsomeonewho
wouldcomeinwithabackgroundandstructureforhowtocollaboratewithall
stakeholderstolearnaboutcurrentstrengthsandtodevelopcollaborativeplansfor
districtimprovement.
Ateam,notasingleleader
Overandovertherewasacommonrefrain:thisjobistoobigforoneperson.Wedon’’t
wantasuperstarwhowilltryanddoitalone.Weneedsomeonewhocanbuildateam;
ateamwhosemembersbringexpertisetheleaderdoesnothave;whosemembersare
alsocommittedtoPhiladelphiaandwhocanworktogethersothattheteamisgreater
thatanyofitsmembers.Asonecharterschoolleadersaid:thenextleadershouldcome
herewithastrongsense––perhapsevenaplaybook––ofhowthatteamwillbe
constructedandsomeideasofwhowillfilleachrole.
It’’saboutthisjob.
Whenpeoplespokeaboutwhetherornotitmatteredifthenextleaderwerefrom
Philadelphia,manyoftheirresponsesincludedthenotionthattheywantthenext
leadertobe““vestedinthesuccess””ofthedistrict.Theywantsomeoneforwhomthis
jobismorethanoneofastringofsuperintendenciesorCEOpositions.Rather,they
wantsomeonewhowantstobehere,notjustinalargeurbanschooldistrict;someone
forwhomPhiladelphiameanssomethingpersonal,andwhohasapersonalstakeinthe
successofthestudents.
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
ͻ
4. Conclusion:
WewouldliketothanktheSRCandSearchCommitteefortheopportunitytosupportthem
andtheschooldistrictintheireffortstolearnfromthebroadrangeofstakeholdersthat
makeupthecommunityfortheSchoolDistrictofPhiladelphia.TheUnitedWayof
SoutheasternPennsylvaniaandtheUniversityofPennsylvaniagreatlyappreciatethe
opportunitytocreateacommunityengagementprocessthatincludedabroadrangeof
stakeholdersfromacrossthecityinmeaningfuldeliberations.Togetherwewereableto
createanopenandtransparentprocess;aprocessthatenabledustotapintothepassion
andcreativeenergyofthosestakeholders.Throughouttheprocess,wehavebeen
impressedbythequalityofstakeholderinterestandseeitasaclearindicationthatpeople
caredeeplyabouttheirpublicschools.Webelievethatpassion,concernandcreativityare
deepresourcesuponwhichtheSRC,SearchCommitteeandtheSchoolDistrictcandrawin
theireffortstobestserveallofthechildrenintheCity.
‘”—•–‘ˆ‘”–Š‡‡ƒ”…Š
‹ƒŽ‡’‘”–
ƒ‰‡
ͳͲ
Download