Canadian and World Studies Notre Dame Catholic Secondary School Course Code: CGW 4U1 Course Name: Canadian and World Issues Level: University Preparation Instructor: S. Sammut Period: Room Number: Course Overview: This course examines the global challenges of creating a sustainable and equitable future, focusing on current issues that illustrate these challenges. Students will investigate a range of topics, including cultural, economic, and geopolitical relationships, regional disparities in the ability to meet basic human needs, and protection of the natural environment. Students will use geotechnologies and skills of geographic inquiry and analysis to develop and communicate balanced opinions about the complex issues facing Canada and a world that is interdependent and constantly changing. Specific Strands of Study and Expectations include: Geographic Foundations: Space and Systems By the end of this course, students will: explain how the earth’s natural and human systems are interconnected in multiple and complex ways; analyse the causes and effects of economic disparities around the world; compare the cultural, economic and political aspirations of selected groups and the effects of their actions on local, national, and global geographic issues. Human-Environment Interactions By the end of this course, students will: analyse the impact of selected global trends on people and environments at the local, national, and global level; analyse geographic issues that arise from the impact of human activities on the environment in different regions of the world; evaluate approaches, policies, and principles relating to the protection and sustainability of the planet’s life-support systems.. Global Connections By the end of this course, students will: analyse the influences that increase the interdependence of countries around the world; analyse instances of international cooperation and conflict and explain the factors that contributed to each; evaluate the social, economic, and environmental impact of the strategies for sustainable development by a variety of individuals, organizations, and institutions. Understanding and Managing Change By the end of this course, students will: analyse trends and predict changes in the human use of the earth and its resources; evaluate the cultural, economic, and environmental impact of changing technology; evaluate the effectiveness of short-term and long-term solutions to geographic problems and issues at the local, national, and global level. Methods of Geographic Inquiry and Communication By the end of this course, students will: use the methods and tools of geographic inquiry to locate, gather, evaluate, and organize information; analyse and interpret data gathered through research and investigation, using a variety of methods and geotechnologies; communicate the results of inquiries, using appropriate terms and concepts and a variety of forms and techniques. Efforts will be made to meet the individual learning needs of students in order to ensure these expectations are being met. Course Breakdown Unit 1 – Introduction: A Look at the World Unit 2 – Diversity and Disparity Unit 3 – Geopolitics and the Environment Unit 4 – Quality of Life, Injustice and the Future Unit 5 – Course Culminating Activity Resources: The course will use a variety of resources including video, Internet Applications and a variety of print sources. The textbook Facing The Future may be distributed to students during the first week of the course. The text and all other resources assigned to students are the responsibility of the student. Any damage incurred will result in payment for replacement. Replacement cost for the text is $90.00. Evaluation Structure:: Knowledge/Understanding Thinking Communication Application 25% 25% 25% 25% The above is reflected both in the term work (worth 70% of the final mark) and the summative work (worth 30% of the final mark). Summative work consists of the Final Exam (15%) and a Culminating Activity (15%). Evaluation Policy Students will be assessed & evaluated according to the work produced & skills displayed. Methods of providing feedback will include assessing work in process & evaluating completed assignments, tests, co-operative learning activities, simulations and presentations. Peer & self-evaluations will also be utilized. Student marks will be determined by evaluating process & product according to 4 categories & 4 levels. Please see the chart below for specific skills and key words used to determine student competency in the different categories. Level 1: Level 2: Level 3: Level 4: Level 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-100% Category Limited Some Considerable Thorough Knowledge/Understanding display of success in display of understanding Knowledge of content (e.g., facts, terms, definitions) knowledge, displaying knowledge of concepts Understanding of content (e.g., concepts, ideas, theories, procedures, processes, skills and knowledge, skills and and ability to methodologies, and/or technologies) ability to skills and ability to communicate, Thinking apply application apply think Use of planning skills (e.g., focusing research, gathering information, organizing an concepts of concepts concepts creatively and inquiry, asking questions, setting goals) apply concepts Use of processing skills (e.g., analysing, generating, integrating, synthesizing, evaluating, detecting point of view and bias) Use of critical/creative thinking processes (e.g., inquiry process, problem-solving process, decision-making process, research process) Communication Expression and organization of ideas and information (e.g., clear expression, logical organization) in oral, written, and visual forms Oral & written communication Communication for different audiences (e.g., peers, adults) and purposes (e.g., to inform, to persuade) in oral, written, and visual forms Use of conventions (e.g., conventions of form, map conventions), vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline in oral, written, and visual forms Application Application of knowledge and skills (e.g., concepts, procedures, processes, and/or technologies) in familiar contexts Transfer of knowledge and skills (e.g., concepts, procedures, methodologies, technologies) to new contexts Making connections within and between various contexts (e.g., past, present, and future; environmental; social; cultural; spatial; personal; multidisciplinary) A student whose achievement is below 50% at the end of the course will not obtain a credit for the course. Feedback will also be provided for student learning skills. Skills like working independently, team work, organization, work habits and homework, and initiative are assessed independently student achievement and will be conducted through the use of a rubric indicating specific criteria to be achieved to receive each of the following letter grades: E –Excellent G – Good S – Satisfactory N - Needs Improvement Other Evaluation Issues LATE ASSIGNMENTS. Assignments submitted after the Primary Due Date established by the teacher will be accepted with a penalty of 5% off for the first day late and 2% for subsequent days to a maximum of 10%. This four-day Penalty Zone is the maximum time allowed for submissions. The fourth day after the assignment is due is considered the Closure Date upon which no further assignments will be accepted. If the teacher returns the marked assignments within the four day penalty zone, the date of return is considered the closure date. Repeated lateness in submissions indicates poor organization skills and will result in parental contact and will be reflected in the learning skills section of the report card. INCOMPLETE ASSSIGNMENTS Assignments will be graded according to the extent with which they meet the criteria established in the rubric or evaluation structure. MISSED TESTS Tests missed with a legitimate reason will be written within a few days of the student returning from the absence. Student eligibility to write the test and the date of writing will be at the discretion of the teacher in consultation with the department head. CULMINATING ACTIVITIES These activities will be due toward the end of the course. They are valued between 5 and 15 per cent of the final mark and will reflect course material and competencies not otherwise reflected on the final exam. PLAGIARISM in any form reflects academic dishonesty and will result in a mark of zero for the assignment in question.