Professional Education Unit
Assessment Report - Initial Preparation Programs
(Abridged)
Academic Year 2006-07
Report Version: August 17, 2007
Note: Any questions or comments regarding the contents of this report should be directed to Tony Norman
(tony.norman@wku.edu), CEBS Associate Dean, Accountability & Research.
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 2 of 21
Professional Education Unit Assessment Report - Initial Preparation Programs (Abridged)
Academic Year 2006-07
Overview: This report includes assessment and survey results from the following data
collection points and sources:
ƒ Admission Data (Academic Year 2006-07)
o Number, percentage, and average GPA by program of teacher preparation
candidates approved by the Professional Education Council for admission
o Admission test score averages by program
ƒ Course Based Assessment Data
o Percentage of candidates scoring at each level of proficiency on critical
performances (Academic Year 2006-07)
o Percentage of candidates scoring at each level of proficiency on critical
performances by Kentucky Teacher Standard (spring 2007)
ƒ Clinical Experiences Data (Spring 2004 through Fall 2006)
o Field Experience Summary Form information by type of experiences, context,
working with students with special needs, and working with diverse students
ƒ Culminating Assessment Data (Academic Year 2006-07)
o Teacher Work Sample Scores by program, by TWS components, and by
Kentucky Teacher Standards
ƒ Exit and Follow Up Data
o Praxis results (2005-06 cohort)
o WKU Teacher Survey results (student-teachers, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year teachers)
o Education Professional Standards Board (EPSB) New Teacher Survey results
(2002-03 through 2005-06)
See the WKU Professional Education Unit Wide Continuous Assessment Matrix – Initial
Preparation on the next page for a conceptual map that guides our initial preparation data
collection efforts. Note that we are in the process of adding several data sources to the electronic
accountability system, and, thus, they are not yet a part of this report.
Section 1 describes results by data collection point. Section 2 summarizes these results based on
what they tell us about candidate proficiency towards Kentucky Teacher Standards.
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 3 of 21
KY
REQ's
Content Knowledge
Designs/Plans
Learning Climate
Implements/Manages
Assessment/Evaluation
Reflection
Collaboration
Professional Development
Technology
Leadership***
Dispositions
FR a-f*
Field Experiences & Clinical
Practice
Diversity
Impacts P-12 Student Learning
DATA MAINTAINED BY:
DATA HOUSED IN:
DATA REPORTING CYCLE:
DATA REVIEWED BY:
Praxis
II
Graduate
Survey
Principal
Survey
DFI 2**
8a-d, Overall
8a-d
8a-d
8a-d
CF 1-5, LG 1-4,
DFI 1, 3-5
1a-e, Overall
1a-e
1a-e
1a-e
2a-e, Overall
2a-e
2a-e
2a-e
IDM 1-3
3a-e, Overall
3a-e
3a-e
3a-e
AP 1-5, ASL 1-4
4a-d, Overall
4a-e
4a-e
4a-e
RSE 1-3
5a-c, Overall
5a-c
5a-c
5a-c
6a-b, Overall
6a-d
6a-d
6a-d
RSE 4-5
7a-c, Overall
7a-d
7a-d
7a-d
DFI 6
9a-d, Overall
9a-d
9a-d
9a-d
10a, Overall
10a-d
10a-d
10a-d
Ed Tech
Ed Tech
FX a-l*
Summary
Form
Summary
Form
Component 5:
Exit and Follow Up Data
State Approved Certification Exams
Faculty
Recs
Various Data Required by State for Admission into Teacher Preparation Programs
Conceptual Framework
Standards/Values
Aligned to Kentucky Teacher Standards
Component 1:
Admission
Data
WKU PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNIT WIDE CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT MATRIX - INITIAL PREPARATION
Component 2:
Component 4:
Component 3:
Course Based
Clinical Experiences Data
Culminating Assessment Data
Assessment Data
Capstone
Early Clinical
Final Clinical
Final Clinical
Exit
Critical Performances
Assessment
Experiences
Experience
Evaluation*
Survey
(TWS)
Disp a-l
OTS Data
OTS Data
CF 1-5, AP 5, DFI
4, IDM 2
Disp g
AP 1-5, ASL 1-4
OTS
Faculty
CEBS ACCSYS
CEBS ACCSYS
Semester
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Biannually
PEC
Faculty/Programs/PEC
Program
Programs/PEC
Programs/PEC
Programs/PEC
Programs/PEC
PEC
Programs/PEC
Programs/PEC
*Data sources in the process of being added to the electronic assessment system
**Cells reflect instruments or rubric/survey items keyed to CF Standards/Values.
***Leadership is a new standard under consideration by the EPSB.
C&I Staff
OTS
CEBS ACCSYS
C&I Staff/Ed Tech
OTS/EdTech
Ed Tech
CEBS ACCSYS
OTS
BANNER/CEBS ACCSYS
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 4 of 21
Section 1. Continuous Assessment Results
A. Admission Data (Academic Year 2006-07)
Table 1 provides the number, percentages, and average overall GPAs of candidates by
program approved by the Professional Education Council (PEC) for admission into initial teacher
preparation programs. Before the Office of Teacher Services submits their names for review and
approval by the PEC, candidates must meet minimum requirements established by the state
and/or the WKU Professional Education Unit.
Table 1 Approved Candidate GPA Averages by Program
CIP Code
0-Unknown
131001-Special Education
131012-Communication Disorders
131201-Agriculture
131202-Early Elementary Education P-5
131203-Middle Grades Education
131204-Interdisciplinary Early Childhood Education
131302-Art Education
131303-Business Education
131307-Health Education
131308-Family and Consumer Science
131312-Music Education
131314-Physical Education
131320-Industrial Technology
160901-French
160905-Spanish
190701-Interdisciplinary Early Childhood Education
230101- English and Allied Language Arts
250101-School Media Specialist
260101- Biological Science
270101-Mathematics
400501-Chemistry
400703- Earth and Space Science
400801-Physics
450101-History/Social Studies
450801-History/Social Studies
500901-Music Education
Grand Total
*Cells with N < 5 not reported
N
11
60
21
10
184
38
14
6
10
1
5
8
15
2
1
5
2
24
2
5
11
3
2
1
26
4
4
475
%
Average GPA
2.3%
3.60
12.6%
3.29
4.4%
3.74
2.1%
3.23
38.7%
3.21
8.0%
3.36
2.9%
3.05
1.3%
3.25
2.1%
3.32
0.2%
*
1.1%
3.16
1.7%
3.63
3.2%
3.17
0.4%
*
0.2%
*
1.1%
3.57
0.4%
*
5.1%
3.35
0.4%
*
1.1%
2.97
2.3%
3.18
0.6%
*
0.4%
*
0.2%
*
5.5%
3.27
0.8%
*
0.8%
*
100.0%
3.28
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 5 of 21
Table 2 provides the average admission test scores of candidates by program approved by the
Professional Education Council (PEC) for admission into initial teacher preparation programs.
Table 2 Approved Candidate Test Score Averages by Program
Major Code
0-Unknown
131001-Special Education
131012-Communications Disorders
131201-Agriculture
131202-Elementary Education
131203-Middle Grades Education
131204-IECE
131302-Art Education
131303-Business Education
131307-Health Education
131308-Family Consumer Science
131312-Music Education
131314-Physical Education
131320-Industrial Technology
160901-French
160905-Spanish
190701-IECE
230101-English Allied Lang Arts
250101-School Media Specialist
260101-Biological Science
270101-Mathematics
400501-Chemistry
400703-Earth Space Science
400801-Physics
450101-History/Social Studies
450801-History/Social Studies
500901-Music Education
Grand Total
ACT
PPSTM**
PPSTR**
N Mean N Mean N Mean N
*
1
24 2
* 1
* 2
9
23 1
* 1
* 1
11
21
7
23 26
176 35
176 35
132
23 6
177 5
176 5
28
22 3
* 3
* 3
9
* 1
* 1
* 2
2
23
8
* 1
* 1
1
21
5
25
8
23 5
178 5
176 5
8
*
2
*
1
* 1
* 1
* 1
2
* 1
* 1
* 1
1
24 2
* 2
* 2
17
2
9
*
24
1
*
19
3
4
289
24 3
* 1
*
23 53
*
*
3
1
177 60
*
*
GRE
Composite
Mean N Mean N Mean
977
10
*
957
17
*
1670
9
*
*
1
2
175 4
*
*
2
174 1
*
*
1
*
*
*
1
*
PPSTW**
SAT
175
*
*
*
1
*
3
1
*
*
1
*
176 62
174
8
1093
2
*
4
2
2
2
3
1
1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
59
1058
*Cells with N < 5 not reported
**PPST refers to the ETS Pre-Professional Skills Tests: Mathematics (M), Reading (R), & Writing (W) respectively.
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 6 of 21
B. Course Based Assessment Data
Table 3 provides the percentage of candidates scoring at each level of proficiency on critical
performances within professional education courses for the 2006-07 academic year. Proficiency
levels are based on the following scale: 1 – Standard Not Met, 2 – Standard Partially Met, 3 – At
Standard, and 4 – Above Standard.
Table 3 CP Proficiency Level Percentages
Course
EDU-250
ELED-345
ELED-355
ELED-365
ELED-405
ELED-406
ELED-407
ELED-465
EXED-331
EXED-332
EXED-333
EXED-415
EXED-417
EXED-418
EXED-419
CP #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
1
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Score %
2
3
0%
53%
0%
57%
0%
17%
0%
39%
0%
40%
3%
64%
4%
51%
6%
61%
1%
99%
0%
99%
1%
99%
2%
98%
3%
95%
0%
68%
10%
77%
4%
70%
13%
77%
0% 100%
2%
78%
3%
85%
0%
99%
2%
94%
0%
80%
0%
72%
0%
67%
0%
74%
1%
71%
0%
89%
2%
86%
8%
86%
0%
70%
6%
77%
14%
82%
3%
88%
2%
98%
0%
95%
0%
89%
3%
87%
2%
89%
0%
0%
0% 100%
5%
43%
0%
15%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4
47%
43%
83%
61%
60%
33%
45%
33%
1%
0%
0%
0%
2%
32%
13%
26%
9%
0%
20%
12%
0%
4%
20%
28%
33%
26%
28%
11%
12%
7%
30%
17%
4%
9%
0%
5%
11%
10%
9%
100%
0%
52%
62%
100%
93%
100%
100%
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 7 of 21
Course
EXED-422
EXED-431
EXED-434
IECE-420
LME-318
LME-407
LME-448
LTCY-320
LTCY-420
LTCY-421
LTCY-444
MGE-275
MGE-475
MGE-477
MGE-479
MGE-481
MGE-485
PSY-310
SEC-351
SEC-352
SEC-453
SEC-473
SEC-475
SEC-477
SEC-479
SEC-481
Grand Total
CP #
1
1
1
1
2
4
5
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
1
4
1
2
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
8%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
8%
8%
2%
0%
0%
0%
11%
3%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
1%
Score %
2
3
0%
24%
0%
21%
0%
71%
5%
40%
5%
45%
10%
25%
15%
8%
0%
56%
0%
66%
0% 100%
0%
88%
0% 100%
4%
57%
0% 100%
9%
47%
100%
0%
100%
0%
15%
48%
14%
36%
0%
9%
0%
4%
0%
4%
7%
55%
0%
53%
0% 100%
0%
98%
0% 100%
0% 100%
44%
33%
12%
59%
10%
90%
0%
0%
0%
33%
2%
32%
0%
5%
8%
31%
2%
5%
0%
0%
13%
62%
33%
48%
2%
80%
4%
83%
31%
56%
8%
75%
3%
24%
1%
40%
0%
7%
2%
62%
8%
56%
11%
37%
7%
56%
0% 100%
0%
75%
17%
50%
50%
0%
32%
68%
4%
63%
4
76%
79%
29%
55%
45%
65%
69%
44%
34%
0%
13%
0%
38%
0%
41%
0%
0%
29%
38%
91%
96%
96%
38%
47%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22%
24%
0%
100%
67%
67%
95%
59%
92%
100%
17%
13%
16%
13%
13%
17%
63%
55%
93%
36%
33%
52%
37%
0%
25%
17%
50%
0%
32%
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 8 of 21
Table 4 provides the number of critical performances for each Kentucky Teacher Standard by
courses in the three major program divisions: Elementary Education, Middle Grades Education,
and Secondary Education. Note that other courses (e.g., PSY 310) have critical performances
(CP) that likely assist programs in meeting all teacher standards. Because of the multiple CPs
discontinued after the fall 2006 semester, results are only from the spring 2007 semester.
Table 4 Number of CPs for Each Kentucky Teacher Standard
Kentucky Teacher Standards
Program
ELED
MGE
SECED
I
4
6
5
II
2
2
2
III
1
2
1
IV
3
6
3
V
2
2
2
VI
1
1
1
VII
1
2
3
VIII
2
6
6
IX
1
2
3
TOTAL
15
6
4
12
6
3
6
14
6
Table 5 indicates the level of candidate proficiency across critical performances related to the
Kentucky Teacher Standards for the spring 2007 semester. The pass rate equals the percentage
of candidates scoring a “3” or higher. The program pass rate is the average pass rate percentage
for all program courses (e.g., for the KTS 1 table below the ELED pass rate is the average of
ELED 345, ELED 365, ELED 406, and ELED 465).
Table 5 CP Scores by Kentucky Teacher Standards
KTS 1
ELED-345
ELED-365
ELED-406
ELED-465
LME-318
LTCY-320
MGE-275
MGE-475
MGE-477
MGE-479
MGE-481
MGE-485
SEC-351
SEC-453
SEC-475
SEC-479
SEC-481
Grand Total
KTS 2
EDU-250
ELED-355
ELED-465
MGE-275
MGE-485
PSY-310
SEC-352
SEC-453
Grand Total
1
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Score %
2
3
1%
99%
13%
77%
0%
89%
0%
89%
0%
64%
4%
45%
6%
94%
0%
100%
33%
50%
17%
42%
0%
100%
3%
98%
31%
56%
11%
37%
0%
75%
50%
0%
33%
67%
7%
75%
4
0%
9%
11%
11%
36%
51%
0%
0%
17%
33%
0%
0%
13%
52%
25%
50%
0%
17%
1
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
2%
0%
1%
Score %
2
3
3%
64%
3%
96%
0%
95%
0%
100%
0%
100%
11%
36%
2%
59%
11%
37%
4%
73%
4
33%
1%
5%
0%
0%
51%
38%
52%
22%
Pass Rate
99%
86%
100%
100%
100%
95%
94%
100%
67%
75%
100%
98%
69%
89%
100%
50%
67%
93%
Pass Rate
96%
97%
100%
100%
100%
87%
96%
89%
95%
Program Pass Rate
Program
96%
ELED
89%
MGE
76%
SECED
Program Pass Rate
Program
99%
ELED
100%
MGE
93%
SECED
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 9 of 21
KTS 3
ELED-406
LTCY-421
LTCY-444
MGE-275
MGE-485
SEC-351
Grand Total
KTS 4
ELED-345
ELED-405
ELED-465
LTCY-320
LTCY-420
MGE-275
MGE-475
MGE-477
MGE-479
MGE-481
MGE-485
PSY-310
SEC-475
SEC-479
SEC-481
Grand Total
KTS 5
EDU-250
ELED-365
ELED-465
MGE-275
MGE-485
SEC-351
SEC-352
Grand Total
KTS 6
ELED-407
EXED-422
LTCY-420
MGE-485
SEC-352
Grand Total
KTS 7
EDU-250
ELED-405
MGE-275
MGE-485
SEC-351
SEC-352
SEC-453
Grand Total
1
0%
10%
21%
0%
0%
0%
3%
Score %
2
3
2%
86%
20%
27%
21%
21%
0%
100%
0%
100%
31%
56%
11%
72%
4
12%
43%
37%
0%
0%
13%
14%
1
1%
0%
0%
1%
7%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
Score %
2
3
1%
99%
3%
82%
3%
87%
4%
45%
13%
46%
6%
94%
0%
100%
33%
50%
17%
42%
0%
100%
3%
98%
3%
9%
0%
75%
50%
0%
33%
67%
5%
63%
4
0%
14%
10%
51%
34%
0%
0%
17%
33%
0%
0%
87%
25%
50%
0%
30%
1
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
Score %
2
3
6%
61%
4%
70%
2%
89%
0%
100%
0%
100%
8%
75%
2%
61%
3%
74%
4
33%
26%
9%
0%
0%
17%
37%
22%
1
0%
0%
7%
0%
2%
3%
Score %
2
3
0%
72%
0%
24%
13%
46%
0%
100%
2%
59%
5%
60%
4
28%
76%
34%
0%
38%
33%
1
1%
0%
2%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1%
Score %
2
3
4%
51%
0%
100%
0%
98%
0%
100%
6%
79%
2%
59%
7%
56%
3%
74%
4
45%
0%
0%
0%
15%
38%
37%
23%
Pass Rate
98%
70%
58%
100%
100%
69%
87%
Pass Rate
99%
97%
97%
95%
80%
94%
100%
67%
75%
100%
98%
96%
100%
50%
67%
94%
Pass Rate
94%
96%
98%
100%
100%
92%
97%
97%
Pass Rate
100%
100%
80%
100%
96%
92%
Pass Rate
96%
100%
98%
100%
94%
96%
93%
96%
Program Pass Rate
Program
98%
ELED
100%
69%
MGE
SECED
Program Pass Rate
Program
97%
ELED
89%
MGE
72%
SECED
Program Pass Rate
Program
97%
ELED
100%
MGE
95%
SECED
Program Pass Rate
Program
100%
ELED
100%
96%
MGE
SECED
Program Pass Rate
Program
100%
ELED
99%
MGE
94%
SECED
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 10 of 21
KTS 8
ELED-405
ELED-407
LME-318
LTCY-420
LTCY-421
LTCY-444
MGE-275
MGE-475
MGE-477
MGE-479
MGE-481
MGE-485
SEC-351
SEC-352
SEC-453
SEC-475
SEC-479
SEC-481
Grand Total
KTS 9
ELED-406
LME-448
MGE-275
MGE-485
SEC-351
SEC-352
SEC-453
Grand Total
1
0%
0%
0%
7%
10%
21%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
Score %
2
3
2%
92%
14%
82%
0%
64%
13%
46%
20%
27%
21%
21%
11%
89%
0%
100%
33%
50%
17%
42%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4%
83%
2%
59%
7%
56%
0%
75%
50%
0%
33%
67%
9%
69%
4
5%
4%
36%
34%
43%
37%
0%
0%
17%
33%
0%
0%
13%
38%
37%
25%
50%
0%
20%
1
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
Score %
2
3
8%
86%
0%
89%
11%
89%
0%
100%
4%
83%
2%
61%
7%
56%
5%
77%
4
7%
11%
0%
0%
13%
37%
37%
18%
Pass Rate
98%
86%
100%
80%
70%
58%
89%
100%
67%
75%
100%
100%
96%
96%
93%
100%
50%
67%
88%
Pass Rate
92%
100%
89%
100%
96%
97%
93%
95%
Table 6 Unavailable
Program Pass Rate
Program
92%
ELED
88%
MGE
84%
SECED
Program Pass Rate
Program
92%
ELED
94%
MGE
95%
SECED
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 11 of 21
C. Clinical Experiences Data (Spring 2004 through Fall 2006)
Over this period, 2086 students reported over 6,000 field placements with an average of 18%
diversity (as provided by the state). Table 7 reveals the percentages of field experiences with
various characteristics. Note that candidates could choose all the characteristics that applied for
any given experience.
Table 7 Percentages of Field Experience by Category Types
Types of Experiences
Observed
Teacher Support
Tutored
93%
70%
Taught Lesson
62%
Mainstreamed
Class
Resource Room
Context
Collaboration
84%
9%
32%
69%
Pullout
Program
Tutorial/Enrichment
15%
19%
Working With Students With Special Needs
Physical
Disability
13%
African
American
81%
Learning
Disability
54%
Mental Disability
EBD
Gifted
ESL
12%
30%
40%
32%
Working with Diverse Students
Native American
Latino/Hispanic
Asian American
6%
54%
32%
Other
27%
Overall, in 82% of their field experiences candidates reported working with at least one student
with special needs and in 89% of their field experiences candidates reported working with at
least one student from a diverse ethnic group.
D. Culminating Assessment Data (Academic Year 2006-07)
TWS Results
Table 8 presents the results of two TWS scoring sessions where independent scorers judged the
quality of the TWS performances. These scores do not include the faculty scores used to
calculate candidates’ course grades. “Passing” represents those candidates who scored a holistic
score of 3 “Proficient” or 4 “Exemplary.” Chart 1 is based on faculty scoring data and depicts
the percentage of candidates by program who averaged at least 2.5 on the indicators for each
TWS Factor: CF – Contextual Factors, LG – Learning Goals, AP – Assessment Plan, DFI –
Design for Instruction, IDM – Instructional Decision Making, ASL – Analysis of Student
Learning, and RSE – Reflection and Self-Evaluation. Chart 2 depicts the percentage of
candidates by program who averaged at least 2.5 on indicators related to each Kentucky Teacher
Standard measured by the TWS.
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 12 of 21
Table 8 TWS Pass Rates By Program
OVERALL
N
%
TWS “PASS” RATES
Fall 2006
# of Candidates
151
Holistic Score 3 or 4
107
Spring 2007
# of Candidates
211
Holistic Score 3 or 4
155
*Cells with N < 5 not reported
ELED
N
%
MGE
N
%
P-12
N
%
SECED
N
%
5-12
N
%
81%
28
14
2
81%
95
77
21
14
67%
5
2
40%
73%
107
83
78%
34
21
63%
18
16
89%
50%
62%
20
15
75%
32
20
Chart 1 Percentage by Program of Candidates who “Passed” Each TWS Factor
100%
90%
80%
TOTAL
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
70%
60%
50%
40%
CF
LG
AP
DFI
IDM
ASL
RSE
Chart 2 Percentage by Program of Candidates who “Passed” Each Teacher Standard
100%
90%
80%
TOTAL
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
70%
60%
50%
40%
KTS1
KTS3
KTS4
KTS5
KTS7
KTS8
KTS9
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 13 of 21
Chart 3 Unavailable
E. Exit and Follow Up Data
Praxis Results (2005-06 Cohort)
Tables 9 and 10 delineate the Educational Testing Services reports of the pass rates of candidates
(N=338) who completed our programs in the 2005-06 academic year (the most recent year with
complete data). The last two columns allow for comparison of the pass rates of our candidates to
those of candidates at other state institutions. Numbers in bold in Table 9 represent totals for
each assessment category. Note that the institutional pass rates in Tables 9 and 10 differ slightly
because Table 9 includes additional candidates in our database, not reported by ETS because of
cell sizes smaller than ten, that we were able to add to the table.
Table 9 Praxis Pass Rates by Assessment Type
Type of Assessment
Professional Knowledge
PRINCIPLES LEARNING & TEACHING K-6
PRINCIPLES LEARNING & TEACHING 5-9
PRINCIPLES LEARNING & TEACHING 7-12
Academic Content Areas
ELEM ED CURR INSTRUC ASSESSMENT
ELEMENTARY ED CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
ENG LANG LIT COMP CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
ENG LANG LIT COMP ESSAYS
MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MATHEMATICS: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
MATH PROOFS MODELS PROBLEMS PART 1
MIDDLE SCHOOL MATHEMATICS
SOCIAL STUDIES: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
SOCIAL STUDIES: INTERPRET MATERIALS
MIDDLE SCHOOL SOCIAL STUDIES
PHYSICAL ED: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
PHYSICAL ED ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
BUSINESS EDUCATION
MUSIC CONCEPTS AND PROCESSES
MUSIC CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
ART MAKING
ART CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
FRENCH CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
GERMAN CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
SPANISH CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
SPANISH PRODUCTIVE LANGUAGE SKILLS
BIOLOGY CONTENT KNOWLEDGE PART 1
BIOLOGY CONTENT ESSAYS
BIOLOGY CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
Code
Number
522
523
524
011
014
041
042
049
061
063
069
081
083
089
091
092
100
111
113
131
133
173
181
191
192
231
233
235
Number
Taking
Assessment
312
202
38
72
391
63
123
12
12
19
0
0
16
26
26
25
6
6
10
7
7
8
8
0
1
3
0
2
2
0
Number
Passing
Assessment
310
201
37
72
378
63
117
12
12
18
0
0
16
26
26
24
6
6
10
6
6
7
8
0
Institutional
Pass Rate
99%
100%
97%
100%
97%
100%
95%
100%
100%
95%
NA
NA
100%
100%
100%
96%
100%
100%
100%
86%
86%
86%
100%
NA
0
NA
0
NA
Statewide
Pass
Rate
98%
99%
94%
98%
96%
97%
97%
96%
95%
94%
100%
98%
98%
98%
95%
95%
99%
99%
98%
98%
98%
92%
95%
NA
NA
71%
NA
94%
100%
100%
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 14 of 21
Number
Passing
Assessment
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
13
0
5
Institutional
Pass Rate
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100%
NA
NA
100%
NA
100%
7
65
0
13
13
17
9
10
100%
100%
NA
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Number
Taking
Assessment
Number
Passing
Assessment
Institutional
Pass Rate
Statewide
Pass Rate
Aggregate - Professional Knowledge
312
310
99%
98%
Aggregate - Academic Content Areas (Math, English, Biology, etc.)
330
318
96%
96%
Aggregate - Other Content Areas (Career/Tech Ed, Health Ed, etc.)
13
13
100%
96%
Aggregate - Teaching Special Populations (Special Ed, ELS, etc.)
39
39
100%
93%
338
326
96%
95%
Type of Assessment
CHEMISTRY CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
CHEMISTRY CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
PHYSICS CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
PHYSICS CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
GENERAL SCI CONTENT KNOWL PART 2
MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE
EARTH SCIENCE CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
LATIN
Other Content Areas
TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION
FAMILY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES
HEALTH EDUCATION
AGRICULTURE
Teaching Special Populations
ED OF DEAF & HARD OF HEARING
SE STUDENTS W/MENTAL RETARDATION
SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
SE APPLIC OF CORE PRINCIPLES ACROSS
EDUC. EXCEPTIONAL STUDENTS: CK
SE BEHAVIORAL/EMOTIONAL
ED EXCEPT STUDENTS: MILD MODER. DISABIL
*Cells with N < 5 not reported
Code
Number
241
245
261
265
432
439
571
600
050
120
550
700
271
321
330
352
353
371
542
Number
Taking
Assessment
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
13
0
5
1
7
65
0
13
13
17
9
10
3
Statewide
Pass
Rate
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
99%
NA
NA
93%
NA
96%
98%
93%
95%
82%
100%
96%
94%
98%
93%
97%
Table 10 Aggregate Praxis Pass Rates by Assessment Type
Type of Assessment
Summary Totals and Pass Rates
Tables 11-13 Unavailable
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 15 of 21
WKU Teacher Survey Results
Below are the results of the electronic WKU Teacher Survey (see Appendix) sent to student
teachers and first, second, and third year teachers during spring 2007. With a 78% (186 of 240
possible) response rate, student-teacher results should be trustworthy; with a 20% (150 of 746
who should have received the e-mail invitation) response rate, the alumni results should be
interpreted cautiously. Of these 150 surveys, only 144 were useful for analysis. Of the alumni
responding, 49 (34%) were first year teachers, 27 (19%) were in their second year, 33 (23%)
were in their third year, and 35 (24%) identified themselves as “Other.” Table 14 further breaks
down the number of respondents by year and program.
Table 14 WKU Survey Respondents by Year and Program
Experience
Student Teaching
First Year
Second Year
Third Year
Grand Total
IECE
14
1
2
17
ELED
74
22
14
10
120
MGE
33
8
2
1
44
SECED
35
11
2
4
52
5-12
11
2
4
1
18
P-12
19
2
5
26
SPED Grand Total
186
4
49
4
27
10
33
18
295
Survey items requested the respondent’s perception of WKU preparation on each of the
Kentucky Teacher Standards using a scale of 1 “Poor” 2 “Fair” 3 “Good” and 4 “Excellent.”
Additionally, respondents evaluated their overall preparation on a similar scale. Below are
average respondent scores by preparation program (1 = IECE, 2 = ELED, 3 = MGE, 4 = SECED,
5 = SPED, 6 = 5-12, 7 = P-12) and teacher experience (0 = student teaching, 1 = 1st year, 2 = 2nd
year, 3 = 3rd year) on the “Overall” preparation question (Chart 4) and then on questions related
to each Kentucky Teacher Standard (Chart 5).
Chart 4 Average of “Overall Preparation” by Program and Teacher Experience
4.00
Average of OVERALL
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
1.00
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
TchExp
3rd Yr Tchr
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 16 of 21
Chart 5 Average Scores on Teacher Standards Questions by Program and Teacher Experience
Kentucky Teacher Standard 1
4.00
Kentucky Teacher Standard 2
KTS1 AVG
4.00
3.00
PROG
3.00
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
1.00
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
KTS2 AVG
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
1.00
3rd Yr Tchr
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
TchExp
KTS3 AVG
4.00
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
KTS4 AVG
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
1.00
1.00
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
St Tchr
3rd Yr Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
3rd Yr Tchr
TchExp
TchExp
Kentucky Teacher Standard 6
Kentucky Teacher Standard 5
4.00
3rd Yr Tchr
Kentucky Teacher Standard 4
Kentucky Teacher Standard 3
4.00
2nd Yr Tchr
TchExp
KTS5 AVG
4.00
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
KTS6 AVG
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
1.00
1.00
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
TchExp
3rd Yr Tchr
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
TchExp
3rd Yr Tchr
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 17 of 21
Kentucky Teacher Standard 8
Kentucky Teacher Standard 7
4.00
KTS7 AVG
4.00
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
KTS8 AVG
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
1.00
1.00
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
St Tchr
3rd Yr Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
3rd Yr Tchr
Kentucky Teacher Standard 10
Kentucky Teacher Standard 9
4.00
2nd Yr Tchr
TchExp
TchExp
KTS9 AVG
4.00
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
KTS10 AVG
3.00
PROG
IECE
ELED
MGE
SECED
5-12
P-12
SPED
2.00
1.00
1.00
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
3rd Yr Tchr
St Tchr
1st Yr Tchr
2nd Yr Tchr
3rd Yr Tchr
TchExp
TchExp
Table 15 Unavailable
EPSB New Teacher Survey Results (2002-03 through 2005-06)
Below are the results of the state EPSB New Teacher Survey. The scale for each item is similar
to the WKU Teacher Survey. The state interviews four groups of respondents regarding WKU’s
preparation of teachers: student teachers, interns (first year teachers), cooperating teachers who
work with student teachers, and resource teachers who work with first year teachers. Table 20
represents results for total respondents by year. Items in red represent averages that fall below 3
“Good.” Table 25 represents results by preparation program of respondents. Again, items in red
represent averages that fall below 3 “Good.” Numbers at the bottom in blue represent programs
with more than seven questions averaging below 3 “Good.”
Tables 16-19 Unavailable
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 18 of 21
Table 20 EPSB Survey Total WKU Responses by Year
TOTAL N
Survey Year
Design Units
Contextual Information
Aligned Assessment
Reliable Assessment
Formative Assessment
Connecting to Real Life
Instructing SPED children
Technology – Instruction
Instructional Variety
Methods of Inquiry
Interpreting Results
PG Plan
Reflection
Presenting Learning
Classroom Management
Critical Thinking
Collaboration
Technology - Instruction
Assessing PD Needs
Ethics
Content Knowledge
Soc/Emotional Problems
Disabilities
SPED Behavior Issues
OVERALL
Reading
Health Education
Environmental Ed
Economics
844
200203
3.47
3.10
3.26
3.16
3.08
3.27
2.75
3.06
3.11
3.13
3.04
3.15
3.32
3.02
3.11
3.20
3.25
2.92
3.13
3.61
3.44
2.78
2.89
2.81
3.35
2.73
2.56
2.60
2.60
316
200304
3.38
3.03
3.17
3.09
3.10
3.26
2.95
3.01
3.11
3.12
3.07
3.25
3.27
2.98
3.09
3.12
3.25
2.91
3.19
3.59
3.45
3.02
3.17
2.96
3.20
2.60
2.56
2.52
2.59
1169
200405
3.48
3.16
3.28
3.19
3.16
3.31
2.88
3.16
3.19
3.14
3.07
3.23
3.34
3.07
3.09
3.21
3.29
3.11
3.18
3.57
3.44
2.97
3.05
2.91
3.34
2.73
2.65
2.65
2.72
Tables 21-24 Unavailable
1014
200506
3.47
3.17
3.30
3.22
3.21
3.33
2.86
3.29
3.21
3.17
3.14
3.25
3.34
3.14
3.09
3.21
3.35
3.24
3.25
3.62
3.46
2.96
3.04
2.91
3.37
3343
Grand Total
3.47
3.14
3.27
3.18
3.15
3.30
2.85
3.16
3.17
3.14
3.08
3.22
3.33
3.07
3.09
3.20
3.29
3.08
3.19
3.60
3.45
2.93
3.01
2.89
3.34
2.71
2.61
2.61
2.66
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 19 of 21
CIS
ELED
ENGL
COMDIS
EX_LBD
EX_MSD
FCS
HLTH
MUSIC-I
IECE
MATH
MGE
PHED
SS
3.5
3.2
3.5
3.1
3.1
3.4
2.8
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.5
3.3
2.9
3.1
3.5
3.3
3.5
3.8
3.8
2.9
2.9
2.8
3.2
2.9
2.6
2.9
3.1
8
22
3.4
3.1
3.2
3.0
3.0
3.2
2.6
2.9
2.9
3.1
3.0
3.2
3.3
3.0
2.9
3.3
3.1
2.8
3.2
3.7
3.4
2.9
2.7
2.5
3.2
2.5
2.2
2.1
2.2
12
44
3.5
3.2
3.4
3.3
3.2
3.4
2.8
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.4
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.1
3.2
3.6
3.5
2.9
2.9
2.9
3.4
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
8
1571
3.5
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.0
3.1
2.7
3.1
3.1
3.0
2.9
3.3
3.3
2.9
3.0
3.3
3.1
2.9
3.1
3.6
3.6
2.9
2.7
2.7
3.3
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.1
12
98
3.3
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.4
3.3
3.0
3.3
3.2
3.4
3.1
3.3
3.6
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.1
3.3
2.9
2.6
2.6
2.7
5
18
3.4
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.0
3.1
3.3
3.0
3.2
3.1
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.5
3.2
3.3
2.8
2.6
2.5
2.6
5
280
3.3
3.1
3.2
3.0
2.9
3.2
3.1
3.0
3.1
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
2.7
3.2
3.0
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.6
3.1
3.0
3.4
3.0
3.2
2.5
2.7
2.7
2.7
11
26
3.5
3.2
3.4
3.2
3.3
3.5
2.6
3.3
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.4
3.2
3.0
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.6
3.5
3.1
2.8
2.8
3.2
2.6
3.1
2.8
3.2
5
37
4.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
0
1
3.4
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.2
2.8
2.8
3.1
3.2
2.9
3.3
3.4
2.8
3.1
3.2
3.2
2.7
3.3
3.7
3.5
2.9
3.0
2.9
3.4
2.4
2.7
2.5
2.3
13
36
3.1
3.1
2.6
2.7
2.6
3.2
3.0
2.8
3.4
3.2
2.6
3.3
3.4
2.4
3.1
3.1
3.6
2.7
3.4
3.7
3.1
3.0
3.6
3.4
3.1
2.8
3.1
2.9
2.9
10
14
3.4
3.0
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.0
2.8
3.0
3.1
3.0
2.8
3.1
3.2
3.0
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.1
2.9
3.5
3.5
3.1
3.4
2.9
3.4
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.7
10
22
3.5
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.1
3.2
2.8
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.3
3.3
3.0
2.8
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.3
3.6
3.5
2.9
3.0
2.8
3.3
2.6
2.4
2.5
2.6
9
170
3.4
3.0
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
2.8
2.9
3.1
3.1
2.9
3.3
3.3
2.9
3.2
3.1
3.1
2.8
3.2
3.7
3.4
2.8
2.9
2.9
3.3
2.5
3.2
2.6
2.4
12
84
3.3
2.9
3.1
3.0
2.9
3.0
2.8
3.1
3.0
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.1
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.4
3.3
2.8
2.8
2.9
3.1
2.6
2.4
2.6
2.9
18
116
TOTAVG
CHEM
3.5
3.1
3.3
3.1
3.2
3.4
2.7
3.5
3.1
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.4
3.0
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.4
3.2
3.6
3.4
2.7
2.8
2.8
3.4
2.4
2.3
2.4
3.2
7
71
MG-SS
BUSI
3.2
3.0
2.8
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
3.0
3.0
2.8
3.5
3.2
2.7
2.7
2.3
3.0
2.2
2.5
2.7
2.0
18
6
MG-SCI
BIOL
3.4
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.3
2.6
3.1
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.5
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.0
3.3
3.7
3.4
2.9
3.1
2.8
3.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.5
7
25
MS-MTH
ART
3.6
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.2
3.4
3.0
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.3
3.1
3.4
3.3
3.1
3.4
3.4
3.2
2.9
3.8
3.5
2.9
3.1
2.9
3.6
2.7
2.5
2.9
2.7
8
27
MS-ENG
AGRI
Table 25 Total EPSB Survey Responses by Program
3.8
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.4
3.8
2.8
3.2
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.4
2.9
3.5
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.7
3.7
3.1
3.2
2.8
3.7
3.7
3.3
3.6
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.0
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.1
3.5
3.3
3.2
3.5
3.7
3.6
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.5
2.9
3.4
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.1
3.5
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.5
3.3
3.3
2.8
3.6
3.6
3.1
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.3
2.7
3.4
3.3
3.2
3.4
3.3
3.5
3.3
3.1
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.6
3.6
3.0
3.2
3.0
3.4
3
13
0
32
2
11
2
23
3.5
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.3
2.9
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.4
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.1
3.2
3.6
3.5
2.9
3.0
2.9
3.4
2.8
2.6
2.6
2.7
7
274
ALL YEARS
Design Units
Contextual Information
Aligned Assessment
Reliable Assessment
Formative Assessment
Connecting to Real Life
Instructing SPED children
Technology - Instruction
Instructional Variety
Methods of Inquiry
Interpreting Results
PG Plan
Reflection
Presenting Learning
Classroom Management
Critical Thinking
Collaboration
Technology - Instruction
Assessing PD Needs
Ethics
Content Knowledge
Soc/Emotional Problems
Disabilities
SPED Behavior Issues
OVERALL
Reading
Health Education
Environmental Ed
Economics
N Items <3.00
Program N
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 20 of 21
Section 2. Continuous Assessment Results
A. Introduction and Context
Although WKU’s Professional Education Unit Conceptual Framework describes the unit’s
mission, vision, and core beliefs, in the current assessment cycle the unit is focusing on the
following key values:
Belief 3 – Diversity. Recognizing and responding to student diversity represents both an
instructional opportunity and instructional necessity. It is an opportunity to use what each child
brings to the learning situation in order to facilitate learning. It is a necessity in that those who
would attempt to ignore it risk marginalizing students, as diversity exists in every classroom and
in every school. Thus, WKU should offer a variety of field experiences that reflect student
diversity and demonstrate success with all students.
Belief 5 – Reflection. Highly effective education professionals have a rich understanding of and
appreciation for student differences and contextual variables. Such understanding requires
reflection as the means to improve professional practice. Thus, WKU should provide multiple
opportunities for candidates to reflect on their experiences toward the goals of improving their
skills and P-12 student learning.
Belief 7 – Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions. WKU has adopted the Kentucky Teacher
Standards as the core professional education competencies (knowledge and skills) targeted by all
education preparation programs. WKU has adopted the following dispositional values: learning,
personal integrity, diversity, collaboration, and professionalism. Thus, WKU should align
curriculum and experiences to ensure that all candidates have the opportunity to develop these
essential competencies and dispositions.
Belief 8 – Technology. Technology provides teachers, school practitioners, and all educators
extensions of their abilities to move toward new and higher performance levels. Thus, the WKU
education professional preparation unit should strive to provide instruction in, model, and assess
the use of technology tools considered essential for instruction, assessment, management, and
research related to schools.
Beliefs 9 & 10 – Accountability and Assessment. Highly effective education professionals
hold themselves accountable for their students’ learning results and use these results to make
decisions about professional development and program improvement. In addition, highly
effective education units develop and maintain an assessment system that provides credible
performance data on the progress and achievement of each candidate available for feedback and
reporting to the candidate, faculty, and program. Thus, WKU should model accountability by
monitoring candidate progress through assessments that are aligned to professional standards.
B. Kentucky Teacher Standards Assessment Summary
Table 26 provides a summary of candidate passing rates within and across assessments and
surveys. Note that the overall average is the calculated average pass rate across assessments and
surveys with each instrument average receiving equal weight.
Unit-Wide_Assessment_Report_0607_Abridged.doc Page 21 of 21
Table 26 Summary of Assessment Results by Kentucky Teacher Standard and Component
Component 2:
Course Based Assessment Data
Component 4:
Culminating Assessment Data
Kentucky Teacher Standards
Component 5:
Exit and Follow Up Data
OVERALL
Critical Performance Pass Rates
TWS Pass Rates
Student Teacher
Survey Pass Rates*
Praxis II Pass Rate
Teacher
Survey
AVERAGE
8 - Content Knowledge
88%
94%
90%
97%
83%
90%
1 - Designs/Plans
93%
88%
87%
74%
86%
2 - Learning Climate
95%
90%
87%
91%
3 - Implements/Manages
87%
82%
87%
74%
83%
4 -Assessment/Evaluation
94%
79%
84%
73%
83%
5 - Reflection
97%
80%
85%
86%
87%
6 - Collaboration
92%
80%
68%
80%
7 - Professional Development
96%
73%
91%
87%
87%
9 - Technology
95%
87%
86%
86%
89%
82%
60%
71%
10 - Leadership
99%**
*Survey Pass Rates calculated as percentage of respondents with Kentucky Teacher Standard Averages >2.99 on survey questions.
**Not included in Rough Average Calculation.