Kentucky's
Education Professional
Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results
2009-2010
Western Kentucky University
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 1
Kentucky's Education Professional Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results 2009-2010
Standard Summary for Western Kentucky University
Case Summaries
STDV-standard deviation
Cooperating Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
Standard 1: The
Teacher
Demonstrates
Applied Content
Knowledge. 1.1
Communicate
concepts,
processes, and
knowledge.
1.2 Connect content
to life experiences of
student.
1.3 Demonstrate
instructional
strategies that are
appropriate for
content and
contribute to student
learning.
1.4 Guide students to
understand content
from various
perspectives.
1.5 Identify and
address students'
misconceptions of
content.
Standard 2: The
Teacher Designs
and Plans
Instruction. 2.1
Develop significant
objectives aligned
with standards.
N
Intern
Mean
STDV
Resource Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
N
Student Teacher
Mean
STDV
N
Total
Mean
STDV
266
3.36
.672
94
3.23
.694
167
3.38
.665
148
3.45
.620
675
3.37
.664
266
3.26
.744
94
3.20
.784
167
3.25
.732
148
3.36
.756
675
3.27
.749
266
3.30
.781
94
3.17
.743
167
3.29
.769
148
3.38
.674
675
3.29
.751
266
3.17
.744
94
3.02
.829
167
3.17
.768
148
3.30
.753
675
3.18
.767
266
3.12
.763
94
3.06
.814
167
3.19
.773
148
3.28
.756
675
3.16
.773
266
3.40
.781
94
3.39
.736
167
3.46
.718
148
3.53
.633
675
3.44
.729
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 1
Kentucky's Education Professional Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results 2009-2010
Standard Summary for Western Kentucky University
Case Summaries
STDV-standard deviation
Cooperating Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
2.2 Use contextual
data to design
instruction relevant to
students.
2.3 Plan
assessments to guide
instruction and
measure learning
objectives.
2.4 Plan instructional
strategies and
activities that address
learning objectives
for all students.
2.5 Plan instructional
strategies and
activities that
facilitate multiple
levels of learning.
Standard 3: The
Teacher Creates &
Maintains Learning
Climate. 3.1
Communicate high
expectations.
3.2 Establish a
positive learning
environment.
3.3 Value and
support student
diversity and address
individual needs.
N
Intern
Mean
STDV
Resource Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
N
Student Teacher
Mean
STDV
N
Total
Mean
STDV
266
3.27
.775
94
3.28
.782
167
3.23
.799
148
3.37
.722
675
3.29
.770
266
3.20
.791
94
3.27
.819
167
3.20
.847
148
3.36
.720
675
3.24
.796
266
3.23
.795
94
3.24
.799
167
3.25
.832
148
3.32
.712
675
3.26
.787
266
3.09
.816
94
3.16
.820
167
3.05
.877
148
3.26
.748
675
3.13
.820
266
3.41
.702
94
3.39
.751
167
3.43
.690
148
3.51
.655
675
3.44
.696
266
3.47
.722
94
3.40
.780
167
3.48
.675
148
3.58
.628
675
3.49
.700
266
3.35
.717
94
3.31
.776
167
3.31
.774
148
3.49
.724
675
3.36
.743
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 2
Kentucky's Education Professional Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results 2009-2010
Standard Summary for Western Kentucky University
Case Summaries
STDV-standard deviation
Cooperating Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
3.4 Foster mutual
respect between
teacher and students
and among students.
3.5 Provide a safe
environment for
learning.
Standard 4: The
Teacher Implements
and Manages
Instruction. 4.1 Use
a variety of
instructional
strategies that align
with learning
objectives and
actively engage
students.
4.2 Implement
instruction based on
diverse student
needs and
assessment data.
4.3 Use time
effectively.
4.4 Use space and
materials effectively.
4.5 Implement and
manage instruction in
ways that facilitate
higher order thinking.
N
Intern
Mean
STDV
Resource Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
N
Student Teacher
Mean
STDV
N
Total
Mean
STDV
266
3.51
.685
94
3.36
.774
167
3.49
.684
148
3.54
.674
675
3.49
.696
266
3.56
.625
94
3.36
.788
167
3.57
.634
148
3.61
.601
675
3.55
.650
266
3.23
.814
94
3.20
.756
167
3.26
.793
148
3.38
.654
675
3.27
.769
266
3.11
.812
94
3.04
.815
167
3.11
.843
148
3.22
.724
675
3.12
.802
266
3.15
.839
94
3.21
.788
167
3.29
.737
148
3.18
.825
675
3.20
.805
266
3.33
.740
94
3.24
.799
167
3.34
.774
148
3.38
.732
675
3.33
.755
266
3.09
.851
94
3.02
.855
167
3.05
.866
148
3.29
.749
675
3.12
.838
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 3
Kentucky's Education Professional Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results 2009-2010
Standard Summary for Western Kentucky University
Case Summaries
STDV-standard deviation
Cooperating Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
Standard 5: The
Teacher
Assesses &
Communicates
Learning Results.
5.1 Use
pre-assessments.
5.2 Use formative
assessments.
5.3 Use summative
assessments.
5.4 Describe,
analyze, and
evaluate student
performance data.
5.5 Communicate
learning results to
students and parents.
5.6 Allow opportunity
for student
self-assessment.
Standard 6: The
Teacher
Demonstrates the
Implementation of
Technology. 6.1
Use available
technology to
design and plan
instruction.
N
Intern
Mean
STDV
Resource Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
N
Student Teacher
Mean
STDV
N
Total
Mean
STDV
266
3.08
.802
94
3.13
.883
167
2.96
.944
148
3.20
.791
675
3.08
.850
266
3.19
.725
94
3.30
.865
167
3.16
.838
148
3.45
.683
675
3.25
.772
266
3.26
.693
94
3.30
.878
167
3.23
.821
148
3.39
.685
675
3.29
.753
266
3.13
.761
94
3.17
.875
167
3.11
.867
148
3.28
.791
675
3.16
.812
266
3.06
.780
94
3.09
.876
167
3.19
.765
148
3.01
.857
675
3.08
.808
266
2.94
.803
94
3.01
.849
167
2.92
.888
148
3.04
.864
675
2.97
.844
266
3.48
.663
94
3.28
.822
167
3.43
.663
148
3.49
.760
675
3.44
.711
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 4
Kentucky's Education Professional Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results 2009-2010
Standard Summary for Western Kentucky University
Case Summaries
STDV-standard deviation
Cooperating Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
6.2 Use available
technology to
implement instruction
that facilitates student
learning.
6.3 Integrate student
use of available
technology into
instruction.
6.4 Use available
technology to assess
and communicate
student learning.
6.5 Demonstrate
ethical and legal use
of technology.
Standard 7: Reflects
on and Evaluates
Teaching and
Learning. 7.1 Use
data to reflect on
and evaluate
student learning.
7.2 Use data to
reflect on and
evaluate instructional
practice.
7.3 Use data to
reflect on and identify
areas for professional
growth.
N
Intern
Mean
STDV
Resource Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
N
Student Teacher
Mean
STDV
N
Total
Mean
STDV
266
3.42
.698
94
3.24
.838
167
3.46
.683
148
3.41
.754
675
3.40
.729
266
3.26
.786
94
3.07
.953
167
3.31
.812
148
3.23
.850
675
3.24
.833
266
3.24
.806
94
3.10
.893
167
3.35
.752
148
3.26
.811
675
3.25
.809
266
3.55
.626
94
3.27
.918
167
3.56
.636
148
3.47
.723
675
3.49
.703
266
3.20
.777
94
3.28
.848
167
3.26
.816
148
3.34
.743
675
3.25
.790
266
3.17
.798
94
3.26
.854
167
3.21
.863
148
3.28
.765
675
3.21
.815
266
3.13
.820
94
3.22
.857
167
3.25
.810
148
3.30
.778
675
3.21
.815
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 5
Kentucky's Education Professional Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results 2009-2010
Standard Summary for Western Kentucky University
Case Summaries
STDV-standard deviation
Cooperating Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
Standard 8:
Collaborates with
Colleagues/Parents/
Other. 8.1 Identify
students whose
learning could be
enhanced by
collaboration.
8.2 Design a plan to
enhance student
learning that includes
all parties in the
collaborative effort.
8.3 Implement
planned activities that
enhance student
learning and engage
all parties.
8.4 Analyze data to
evaluate the
outcomes of
collaborative efforts.
Standard 9:
Evaluates and
Implements
Professional
Development. 9.1
Self assess
performance
relative to
Kentucky's Teacher
Standards.
N
Intern
Mean
STDV
Resource Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
N
Student Teacher
Mean
STDV
N
Total
Mean
STDV
266
3.19
.725
94
3.22
.844
167
3.38
.701
148
3.20
.873
675
3.25
.773
266
3.11
.780
94
3.18
.789
167
3.28
.744
148
3.14
.846
675
3.17
.789
266
3.17
.788
94
3.16
.807
167
3.27
.756
148
3.18
.800
675
3.19
.785
266
3.09
.783
94
3.09
.888
167
3.23
.791
148
3.03
.836
675
3.11
.814
266
3.27
.782
94
3.28
.754
167
3.34
.759
148
3.41
.755
675
3.32
.767
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 6
Kentucky's Education Professional Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results 2009-2010
Standard Summary for Western Kentucky University
Case Summaries
STDV-standard deviation
Cooperating Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
9.2 Identify priorities
for professional
development based
on data from
self-assessment,
student performance
and feedback from
colleagues.
9.3 Design a
professional growth
plan that addresses
identified priorities.
9.4 Show evidence of
professional growth
and reflection on the
identified priority
areas and impact on
instructional
effectiveness and
student learning.
Standard 10:
Provides Leadershi
p within
School/Community/
Profession. 10.1
Identify leadership
opportunities that
enhance student
learning and/or
professional
environment of the
school.
N
Intern
Mean
STDV
Resource Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
N
Student Teacher
Mean
STDV
N
Total
Mean
STDV
266
3.21
.753
94
3.32
.736
167
3.29
.747
148
3.34
.726
675
3.28
.744
266
3.15
.820
94
3.24
.799
167
3.28
.783
148
3.29
.802
675
3.23
.805
266
3.18
.775
94
3.20
.837
167
3.30
.749
148
3.28
.756
675
3.24
.774
266
3.10
.837
94
3.11
.823
167
3.30
.707
148
3.22
.745
675
3.18
.788
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 7
Kentucky's Education Professional Standards Board
New Teacher Survey Results 2009-2010
Standard Summary for Western Kentucky University
Case Summaries
STDV-standard deviation
Cooperating Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
10.2 Develop a plan
for engaging in
leadership activities.
10.3 Implement a
plan for engaging in
leadership activities.
10.4 Analyze data to
evaluate the results
of planned and
executed leadership
efforts.
N
Intern
Mean
STDV
Resource Teacher
N
Mean
STDV
N
Student Teacher
Mean
STDV
N
Total
Mean
STDV
266
3.05
.839
94
3.06
.878
167
3.29
.755
148
3.15
.820
675
3.13
.824
266
3.05
.846
94
3.05
.872
167
3.29
.745
148
3.16
.814
675
3.13
.823
266
3.01
.838
94
2.99
.874
167
3.21
.767
148
3.05
.836
675
3.06
.828
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 8
Standard 1: The Teacher Demonstrates Applied Content Knowledge. 1.1 Communicate concepts, processes,
and knowledge.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
123
46.2%
120
45.1%
20
7.5%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
35
37.2%
47
50.0%
11
11.7%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
81
48.5%
69
41.3%
17
10.2%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
76
51.4%
62
41.9%
10
6.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
315
46.7%
298
44.1%
58
8.6%
*
*
675
100.0%
Standard 1: The Teacher Demonstrates Applied Content Knowledge. 1.2 Connect content to life experiences
of student.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
113
42.5%
111
41.7%
39
14.7%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
38
40.4%
39
41.5%
15
16.0%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
67
40.1%
77
46.1%
20
12.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
76
51.4%
51
34.5%
19
12.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
294
43.6%
278
41.2%
93
13.8%
10
1.5%
675
100.0%
Standard 1: The Teacher Demonstrates Applied Content Knowledge. 1.3 Demonstrate instructional
strategies that are appropriate for content and contribute to student learning.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
125
47.0%
102
38.3%
32
12.0%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
33
35.1%
46
48.9%
13
13.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
75
44.9%
70
41.9%
17
10.2%
5
3.0%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
71
48.0%
63
42.6%
13
8.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
304
45.0%
281
41.6%
75
11.1%
15
2.2%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 2
Standard 1: The Teacher Demonstrates Applied Content Knowledge. 1.4 Guide students to understand
content from various perspectives.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
93
35.0%
130
48.9%
37
13.9%
6
2.3%
266
100.0%
Intern
28
29.8%
45
47.9%
16
17.0%
5
5.3%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
61
36.5%
79
47.3%
22
13.2%
5
3.0%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
68
45.9%
60
40.5%
17
11.5%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
250
37.0%
314
46.5%
92
13.6%
19
2.8%
675
100.0%
Standard 1: The Teacher Demonstrates Applied Content Knowledge. 1.5 Identify and address students'
misconceptions of content.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
88
33.1%
129
48.5%
42
15.8%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
30
31.9%
44
46.8%
16
17.0%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
64
38.3%
74
44.3%
25
15.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
67
45.3%
58
39.2%
21
14.2%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
249
36.9%
305
45.2%
104
15.4%
17
2.5%
675
100.0%
Standard 2: The Teacher Designs and Plans Instruction. 2.1 Develop significant objectives aligned with standards.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
146
54.9%
89
33.5%
22
8.3%
9
3.4%
266
100.0%
Intern
50
53.2%
32
34.0%
11
11.7%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
96
57.5%
55
32.9%
13
7.8%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
89
60.1%
50
33.8%
8
5.4%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
381
56.4%
226
33.5%
54
8.0%
14
2.1%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 3
Standard 2: The Teacher Designs and Plans Instruction. 2.2 Use contextual data to design instruction
relevant to students.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
121
45.5%
102
38.3%
38
14.3%
5
1.9%
266
100.0%
Intern
43
45.7%
36
38.3%
13
13.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
73
43.7%
64
38.3%
26
15.6%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
74
50.0%
57
38.5%
15
10.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
311
46.1%
259
38.4%
92
13.6%
13
1.9%
675
100.0%
Standard 2: The Teacher Designs and Plans Instruction. 2.3 Plan assessments to guide instruction and
measure learning objectives.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
107
40.2%
111
41.7%
41
15.4%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
44
46.8%
34
36.2%
13
13.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
74
44.3%
59
35.3%
28
16.8%
6
3.6%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
72
48.6%
61
41.2%
12
8.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
297
44.0%
265
39.3%
94
13.9%
19
2.8%
675
100.0%
Standard 2: The Teacher Designs and Plans Instruction. 2.4 Plan instructional strategies and activities that
address learning objectives for all students.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
116
43.6%
102
38.3%
42
15.8%
6
2.3%
266
100.0%
Intern
42
44.7%
35
37.2%
15
16.0%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
76
45.5%
63
37.7%
21
12.6%
7
4.2%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
67
45.3%
64
43.2%
15
10.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
301
44.6%
264
39.1%
93
13.8%
17
2.5%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 4
Standard 2: The Teacher Designs and Plans Instruction. 2.5 Plan instructional strategies and activities that
facilitate multiple levels of learning.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
93
35.0%
114
42.9%
50
18.8%
9
3.4%
266
100.0%
Intern
37
39.4%
38
40.4%
16
17.0%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
59
35.3%
66
39.5%
33
19.8%
9
5.4%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
62
41.9%
65
43.9%
18
12.2%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
251
37.2%
283
41.9%
117
17.3%
24
3.6%
675
100.0%
Standard 3: The Teacher Creates & Maintains Learning Climate. 3.1 Communicate high expectations.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
142
53.4%
93
35.0%
30
11.3%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
51
54.3%
30
31.9%
12
12.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
90
53.9%
60
35.9%
16
9.6%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
88
59.5%
49
33.1%
10
6.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
371
55.0%
232
34.4%
68
10.1%
*
*
675
100.0%
Standard 3: The Teacher Creates & Maintains Learning Climate. 3.2 Establish a positive learning environment.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
155
58.3%
89
33.5%
15
5.6%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
53
56.4%
28
29.8%
11
11.7%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
96
57.5%
56
33.5%
14
8.4%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
96
64.9%
43
29.1%
8
5.4%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
400
59.3%
216
32.0%
48
7.1%
11
1.6%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 5
Standard 3: The Teacher Creates & Maintains Learning Climate. 3.3 Value and support student diversity and
address individual needs.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
125
47.0%
113
42.5%
23
8.6%
5
1.9%
266
100.0%
Intern
45
47.9%
35
37.2%
12
12.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
78
46.7%
67
40.1%
17
10.2%
5
3.0%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
91
61.5%
41
27.7%
14
9.5%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
339
50.2%
256
37.9%
66
9.8%
14
2.1%
675
100.0%
Standard 3: The Teacher Creates & Maintains Learning Climate. 3.4 Foster mutual respect between teacher
and students and among students.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
160
60.2%
87
32.7%
14
5.3%
5
1.9%
266
100.0%
Intern
50
53.2%
29
30.9%
14
14.9%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
99
59.3%
52
31.1%
15
9.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
94
63.5%
41
27.7%
12
8.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
403
59.7%
209
31.0%
55
8.1%
8
1.2%
675
100.0%
Standard 3: The Teacher Creates & Maintains Learning Climate. 3.5 Provide a safe environment for learning.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
165
62.0%
88
33.1%
10
3.8%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
50
53.2%
30
31.9%
12
12.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
108
64.7%
48
28.7%
10
6.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
99
66.9%
42
28.4%
6
4.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
422
62.5%
208
30.8%
38
5.6%
7
1.0%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 6
Standard 4: The Teacher Implements and Manages Instruction. 4.1 Use a variety of instructional strategies
that align with learning objectives and actively engage students.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
117
44.0%
103
38.7%
37
13.9%
9
3.4%
266
100.0%
Intern
37
39.4%
40
42.6%
16
17.0%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
75
44.9%
66
39.5%
21
12.6%
5
3.0%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
69
46.6%
67
45.3%
11
7.4%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
298
44.1%
276
40.9%
85
12.6%
16
2.4%
675
100.0%
Standard 4: The Teacher Implements and Manages Instruction. 4.2 Implement instruction based on diverse
student needs and assessment data.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
95
35.7%
115
43.2%
47
17.7%
9
3.4%
266
100.0%
Intern
30
31.9%
41
43.6%
20
21.3%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
63
37.7%
65
38.9%
33
19.8%
6
3.6%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
57
38.5%
67
45.3%
23
15.5%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
245
36.3%
288
42.7%
123
18.2%
19
2.8%
675
100.0%
Standard 4: The Teacher Implements and Manages Instruction. 4.3 Use time effectively.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
107
40.2%
103
38.7%
46
17.3%
10
3.8%
266
100.0%
Intern
39
41.5%
38
40.4%
15
16.0%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
74
44.3%
69
41.3%
22
13.2%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
63
42.6%
52
35.1%
30
20.3%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
283
41.9%
262
38.8%
113
16.7%
17
2.5%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 7
Standard 4: The Teacher Implements and Manages Instruction. 4.4 Use space and materials effectively.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
127
47.7%
106
39.8%
28
10.5%
5
1.9%
266
100.0%
Intern
43
45.7%
32
34.0%
18
19.1%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
84
50.3%
60
35.9%
19
11.4%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
77
52.0%
51
34.5%
19
12.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
331
49.0%
249
36.9%
84
12.4%
11
1.6%
675
100.0%
Standard 4: The Teacher Implements and Manages Instruction. 4.5 Implement and manage instruction in
ways that facilitate higher order thinking.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
96
36.1%
111
41.7%
46
17.3%
13
4.9%
266
100.0%
Intern
32
34.0%
35
37.2%
24
25.5%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
59
35.3%
66
39.5%
34
20.4%
8
4.8%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
67
45.3%
59
39.9%
20
13.5%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
254
37.6%
271
40.1%
124
18.4%
26
3.9%
675
100.0%
Standard 5: The Teacher Assesses & Communicates Learning Results. 5.1 Use pre-assessments.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
90
33.8%
112
42.1%
58
21.8%
6
2.3%
266
100.0%
Intern
37
39.4%
38
40.4%
13
13.8%
6
6.4%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
58
34.7%
58
34.7%
38
22.8%
13
7.8%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
61
41.2%
59
39.9%
25
16.9%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
246
36.4%
267
39.6%
134
19.9%
28
4.1%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 8
Standard 5: The Teacher Assesses & Communicates Learning Results. 5.2 Use formative assessments.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
98
36.8%
123
46.2%
43
16.2%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
48
51.1%
31
33.0%
10
10.6%
5
5.3%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
69
41.3%
61
36.5%
32
19.2%
5
3.0%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
80
54.1%
56
37.8%
10
6.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
295
43.7%
271
40.1%
95
14.1%
14
2.1%
675
100.0%
Standard 5: The Teacher Assesses & Communicates Learning Results. 5.3 Use summative assessments.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
105
39.5%
127
47.7%
32
12.0%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
49
52.1%
29
30.9%
11
11.7%
5
5.3%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
76
45.5%
58
34.7%
29
17.4%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
72
48.6%
63
42.6%
11
7.4%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
302
44.7%
277
41.0%
83
12.3%
13
1.9%
675
100.0%
Standard 5: The Teacher Assesses & Communicates Learning Results. 5.4 Describe, analyze, and evaluate
student performance data.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
90
33.8%
126
47.4%
44
16.5%
6
2.3%
266
100.0%
Intern
41
43.6%
32
34.0%
17
18.1%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
65
38.9%
64
38.3%
30
18.0%
8
4.8%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
69
46.6%
56
37.8%
19
12.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
265
39.3%
278
41.2%
110
16.3%
22
3.3%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 9
Standard 5: The Teacher Assesses & Communicates Learning Results. 5.5 Communicate learning results to
students and parents.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
81
30.5%
128
48.1%
49
18.4%
8
3.0%
266
100.0%
Intern
35
37.2%
37
39.4%
17
18.1%
5
5.3%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
65
38.9%
70
41.9%
30
18.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
47
31.8%
64
43.2%
29
19.6%
8
5.4%
148
100.0%
Total
228
33.8%
299
44.3%
125
18.5%
23
3.4%
675
100.0%
Standard 5: The Teacher Assesses & Communicates Learning Results. 5.6 Allow opportunity for student
self-assessment.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
68
25.6%
124
46.6%
64
24.1%
10
3.8%
266
100.0%
Intern
29
30.9%
42
44.7%
18
19.1%
5
5.3%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
47
28.1%
71
42.5%
37
22.2%
12
7.2%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
52
35.1%
56
37.8%
34
23.0%
6
4.1%
148
100.0%
Total
196
29.0%
293
43.4%
153
22.7%
33
4.9%
675
100.0%
Standard 6: The Teacher Demonstrates the Implementation of Technology. 6.1 Use available technology to
design and plan instruction.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
151
56.8%
96
36.1%
16
6.0%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
45
47.9%
33
35.1%
13
13.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
87
52.1%
66
39.5%
13
7.8%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
92
62.2%
42
28.4%
9
6.1%
5
3.4%
148
100.0%
Total
375
55.6%
237
35.1%
51
7.6%
12
1.8%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 10
Standard 6: The Teacher Demonstrates the Implementation of Technology. 6.2 Use available technology to
implement instruction that facilitates student learning.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
141
53.0%
101
38.0%
20
7.5%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
43
45.7%
35
37.2%
12
12.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
93
55.7%
58
34.7%
15
9.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
81
54.7%
49
33.1%
15
10.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
358
53.0%
243
36.0%
62
9.2%
12
1.8%
675
100.0%
Standard 6: The Teacher Demonstrates the Implementation of Technology. 6.3 Integrate student use of
available technology into instruction.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
120
45.1%
102
38.3%
38
14.3%
6
2.3%
266
100.0%
Intern
39
41.5%
30
31.9%
18
19.1%
7
7.4%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
83
49.7%
57
34.1%
22
13.2%
5
3.0%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
69
46.6%
49
33.1%
25
16.9%
5
3.4%
148
100.0%
Total
311
46.1%
238
35.3%
103
15.3%
23
3.4%
675
100.0%
Standard 6: The Teacher Demonstrates the Implementation of Technology. 6.4 Use available technology to
assess and communicate student learning.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
118
44.4%
100
37.6%
41
15.4%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
37
39.4%
34
36.2%
18
19.1%
5
5.3%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
84
50.3%
59
35.3%
22
13.2%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
68
45.9%
56
37.8%
19
12.8%
5
3.4%
148
100.0%
Total
307
45.5%
249
36.9%
100
14.8%
19
2.8%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 11
Standard 6: The Teacher Demonstrates the Implementation of Technology. 6.5 Demonstrate ethical and
legal use of technology.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
163
61.3%
88
33.1%
13
4.9%
*
*
266
100.0%
Intern
49
52.1%
27
28.7%
12
12.8%
6
6.4%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
106
63.5%
50
29.9%
10
6.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
86
58.1%
48
32.4%
11
7.4%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
404
59.9%
213
31.6%
46
6.8%
12
1.8%
675
100.0%
Standard 7: Reflects on and Evaluates Teaching and Learning. 7.1 Use data to reflect on and evaluate
student learning.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
106
39.8%
111
41.7%
44
16.5%
5
1.9%
266
100.0%
Intern
46
48.9%
32
34.0%
12
12.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
77
46.1%
63
37.7%
21
12.6%
6
3.6%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
70
47.3%
62
41.9%
12
8.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
299
44.3%
268
39.7%
89
13.2%
19
2.8%
675
100.0%
Standard 7: Reflects on and Evaluates Teaching and Learning. 7.2 Use data to reflect on and evaluate
instructional practice.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
103
38.7%
111
41.7%
45
16.9%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
45
47.9%
32
34.0%
13
13.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
74
44.3%
63
37.7%
21
12.6%
9
5.4%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
66
44.6%
62
41.9%
16
10.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
288
42.7%
268
39.7%
95
14.1%
24
3.6%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 12
Standard 7: Reflects on and Evaluates Teaching and Learning. 7.3 Use data to reflect on and identify areas
for professional growth.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
96
36.1%
122
45.9%
35
13.2%
13
4.9%
266
100.0%
Intern
43
45.7%
33
35.1%
14
14.9%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
76
45.5%
60
35.9%
27
16.2%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
69
46.6%
58
39.2%
17
11.5%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
284
42.1%
273
40.4%
93
13.8%
25
3.7%
675
100.0%
Standard 8: Collaborates with Colleagues/Parents/Other. 8.1 Identify students whose learning could be
enhanced by collaboration.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
95
35.7%
132
49.6%
34
12.8%
5
1.9%
266
100.0%
Intern
43
45.7%
32
34.0%
16
17.0%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
83
49.7%
67
40.1%
15
9.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
68
45.9%
48
32.4%
26
17.6%
6
4.1%
148
100.0%
Total
289
42.8%
279
41.3%
91
13.5%
16
2.4%
675
100.0%
Standard 8: Collaborates with Colleagues/Parents/Other. 8.2 Design a plan to enhance student learning that
includes all parties in the collaborative effort.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
88
33.1%
126
47.4%
44
16.5%
8
3.0%
266
100.0%
Intern
37
39.4%
39
41.5%
16
17.0%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
73
43.7%
71
42.5%
20
12.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
56
37.8%
64
43.2%
20
13.5%
8
5.4%
148
100.0%
Total
254
37.6%
300
44.4%
100
14.8%
21
3.1%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 13
Standard 8: Collaborates with Colleagues/Parents/Other. 8.3 Implement planned activities that enhance
student learning and engage all parties.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
101
38.0%
115
43.2%
43
16.2%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
37
39.4%
37
39.4%
18
19.1%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
73
43.7%
69
41.3%
22
13.2%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
56
37.8%
70
47.3%
15
10.1%
7
4.7%
148
100.0%
Total
267
39.6%
291
43.1%
98
14.5%
19
2.8%
675
100.0%
Standard 8: Collaborates with Colleagues/Parents/Other. 8.4 Analyze data to evaluate the outcomes of
collaborative efforts.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
88
33.1%
122
45.9%
49
18.4%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
36
38.3%
35
37.2%
18
19.1%
5
5.3%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
72
43.1%
66
39.5%
25
15.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
47
31.8%
66
44.6%
28
18.9%
7
4.7%
148
100.0%
Total
243
36.0%
289
42.8%
120
17.8%
23
3.4%
675
100.0%
Standard 9: Evaluates and Implements Professional Development. 9.1 Self assess performance relative to
Kentucky's Teacher Standards.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
118
44.4%
109
41.0%
31
11.7%
8
3.0%
266
100.0%
Intern
41
43.6%
40
42.6%
11
11.7%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
83
49.7%
61
36.5%
20
12.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
81
54.7%
51
34.5%
12
8.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
323
47.9%
261
38.7%
74
11.0%
17
2.5%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 14
Standard 9: Evaluates and Implements Professional Development. 9.2 Identify priorities for professional
development based on data from self-assessment, student performance and feedback from colleagues.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
103
38.7%
122
45.9%
35
13.2%
6
2.3%
266
100.0%
Intern
44
46.8%
37
39.4%
12
12.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
74
44.3%
72
43.1%
17
10.2%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
69
46.6%
65
43.9%
10
6.8%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
290
43.0%
296
43.9%
74
11.0%
15
2.2%
675
100.0%
Standard 9: Evaluates and Implements Professional Development. 9.3 Design a professional growth plan that
addresses identified priorities.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
102
38.3%
112
42.1%
42
15.8%
10
3.8%
266
100.0%
Intern
41
43.6%
38
40.4%
12
12.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
75
44.9%
70
41.9%
16
9.6%
6
3.6%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
69
46.6%
59
39.9%
14
9.5%
6
4.1%
148
100.0%
Total
287
42.5%
279
41.3%
84
12.4%
25
3.7%
675
100.0%
Standard 9: Evaluates and Implements Professional Development. 9.4 Show evidence of professional growth
and reflection on the identified priority areas and impact on instructional effectiveness and student learning.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
101
38.0%
119
44.7%
39
14.7%
7
2.6%
266
100.0%
Intern
40
42.6%
37
39.4%
13
13.8%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
74
44.3%
74
44.3%
14
8.4%
5
3.0%
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
65
43.9%
64
43.2%
15
10.1%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
280
41.5%
294
43.6%
81
12.0%
20
3.0%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 15
Standard 10: Provides Leadership within School/Community/Profession. 10.1 Identify leadership
opportunities that enhance student learning and/or professional environment of the school.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
97
36.5%
108
40.6%
51
19.2%
10
3.8%
266
100.0%
Intern
34
36.2%
39
41.5%
18
19.1%
*
*
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
72
43.1%
75
44.9%
18
10.8%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
59
39.9%
65
43.9%
22
14.9%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
262
38.8%
287
42.5%
109
16.1%
17
2.5%
675
100.0%
Standard 10: Provides Leadership within School/Community/Profession. 10.2 Develop a plan for engaging in
leadership activities.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
89
33.5%
112
42.1%
54
20.3%
11
4.1%
266
100.0%
Intern
33
35.1%
40
42.6%
15
16.0%
6
6.4%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
76
45.5%
67
40.1%
21
12.6%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
57
38.5%
61
41.2%
25
16.9%
5
3.4%
148
100.0%
Total
255
37.8%
280
41.5%
115
17.0%
25
3.7%
675
100.0%
Standard 10: Provides Leadership within School/Community/Profession. 10.3 Implement a plan for engaging
in leadership activities.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
89
33.5%
112
42.1%
53
19.9%
12
4.5%
266
100.0%
Intern
32
34.0%
41
43.6%
15
16.0%
6
6.4%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
74
44.3%
70
41.9%
20
12.0%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
58
39.2%
59
39.9%
27
18.2%
*
*
148
100.0%
Total
253
37.5%
282
41.8%
115
17.0%
25
3.7%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 16
Standard 10: Provides Leadership within School/Community/Profession. 10.4 Analyze data to evaluate the
results of planned and executed leadership efforts.
ROLE
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Count
% within ROLE
Cooperating
Teacher
82
30.8%
116
43.6%
56
21.1%
12
4.5%
266
100.0%
Intern
29
30.9%
41
43.6%
18
19.1%
6
6.4%
94
100.0%
Resource
Teacher
66
39.5%
74
44.3%
23
13.8%
*
*
167
100.0%
Student
Teacher
48
32.4%
66
44.6%
27
18.2%
7
4.7%
148
100.0%
Total
225
33.3%
297
44.0%
124
18.4%
29
4.3%
675
100.0%
Rating Scale is Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
*No calculations are performed for cells with less than five respondents.
Source: EPSB, contact Jaime Rice at jaime.rice@ky.gov
Page 17