Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution (plus detailed notes)
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Alabama, U of (Birmingham)
Alabama, U of (Tuscaloosa)
Arizona State U.
Arizona, U of
Arkansas, U of
Auburn, U of
Baylor College of Med
Boston College
Boston U.
Brown U.
California Inst. of Technology
California St U, Dom Hills
California St U, San Diego
California St U, Fresno
California, U of (Berkeley)
California, U of (Davis)
California, U of (Los Angeles)
California, U of (San Diego)
California, U of (San Fran)
California, U of, (Irvine)
Carnegie Mellon U.
Case Western Reserve U.
Chicago, U of
Children's Hosp Phil, Stokes Res Inst
Cincinnati, U of
City of Hope, Beckman Res Inst
City U. of New York
Clemson U.
Colorado State U.
Colorado, U of (Boulder)
Colorado, U of (Health Sciences)
Columbia U.
Connecticut, U of, (Storrs)
Connecticut, U of, (Health Sci Ctr)
Cornell U.
ADMIN ACAD
40.0% 60.0%
68.0% 32.0%
75.0% 25.0%
64.8% 35.2%
55.3% 44.7%
47.2% 52.8%
100.0%
100.0%
80.5% 19.5%
50.0% 50.0%
ADMIN. CATEGORIES
VP of
O&M,
Other
Res
Plant Library Admin
5.5%
7.5%
15.0%
75.0%
19.5%
10.8%
32.6%
2.0%
28.8%
8.4%
10.5%
7.6%
37.2%
10.0%
100.0%
100.0%
80.5%
50.0%
Central
Adm
27.0%
53.0%
90.0%
82.0%
10.0%
18.0%
80.0%
10.0%
57.0%
67.5%
43.0%
32.5%
10.0%
17.5%
6.0%
38.0%
87.9%
79.0%
12.1%
21.0%
10.7%
58.0%
0.7%
13.0%
47.8%
0.3%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
62.8% 37.2%
100.0%
2.8% 97.3%
33.0%
5.0%
10.0%
2.0%
50.0%
59.7%
71.0%
79.5%
40.3%
29.0%
20.5%
100.0%
55.0% 45.0%
100.0%
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
45.9%
100.0%
2.8%
7.0%
40.0%
10.0%
100.0%
10.0%
2.0%
3.0%
50.0%
5.0%
32.5%
28.4%
8.0%
12.1%
0.7%
31.7%
5.0%
2.3%
TOTAL
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
7.0% 100.0%
100.0%
12.5%
50.0%
82.0%
16.9%
52.0%
71.0%
45.6%
ACAD. CATEGORIES
Res Inst Other
Dean
Dept
PI
or Ctr
Acad
55.4%
4.6%
32.0%
20.0%
5.0%
35.2%
35.9%
8.8%
25.8%
27.0%
5.0%
11.0%
5.0%
24.0%
15.0%
100.0%
35.0%
4.7%
27.9%
0.4%
8.8%
39.0%
2.0%
20.5%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
100.0%
100.0%
1.0%
8.0% 100.0%
100.0%
21.0%
100.0%
100.0%
79.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
4.6%
8.8%
1.3% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
25.0%
100.0%
12.0%
5.0%
100.0%
Page 1 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution (plus detailed notes)
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Dartmouth College
Dayton, U of
Denver, U of
Duke U.
Florida State U.
Florida, U of
Fox Chase Cancer Center
George Mason U.
George Washington U.
Georgetown U.
Georgia Inst. of Technology
Georgia, Medical College of
Harvard Medical School
Harvard U.
Harvard, Public Health
Idaho, U of
Illinois, U of (Urbana)
Indiana U.
Iowa State U
Iowa, U of
Johns Hopkins U.
Kansas St U.
Kansas, U of
Kentucky, U of
Lehigh U.
Louisiana State U. Health Sci (N.O.)
Louisville, U of
Loyola U.
Maryland, U of (College Park)
Massachusetts Inst. of Technology
Massachusetts, U of (Amherst)
Med and Dentistry of NJ, U of
Medical U. of South Carolina
Miami, U of
Michigan State U.
ADMIN ACAD
25.0% 75.0%
100.0%
79.0% 21.0%
13.1% 86.9%
44.5% 55.5%
46.5% 53.5%
100.0%
59.7% 40.3%
13.2%
Central
Adm
25.0%
73.0%
10.0%
8.7%
33.0%
30.0%
100.0%
86.8%
ADMIN. CATEGORIES
VP of
O&M,
Res
Plant Library
92.4%
4.0%
0.8%
31.5%
30.2%
17.0%
29.7%
2.0%
12.3%
3.0%
5.0%
47.0%
Other
Admin
7.6%
1.5%
3.0%
1.1%
13.2%
100.0%
40.0%
44.7%
95.0%
24.0%
27.1%
9.7%
16.8%
56.0%
58.3%
29.1%
13.8%
5.0%
7.0%
0.4%
59.0%
41.0%
49.0%
2.0%
36.0%
84.0%
74.1%
65.0%
100.0%
50.0%
100.0%
64.0%
16.0%
25.9%
35.0%
8.0%
84.0%
53.1%
29.0%
100.0%
50.0%
100.0%
21.0%
9.0%
16.0%
56.0%
84.0%
44.0%
14.0%
80.0%
20.0%
72.5%
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
5.8%
28.5%
21.0%
1.1%
17.8%
7.5%
10.0%
20.1%
8.1%
12.1%
4.0%
52.1%
57.0%
4.7%
7.5%
39.0%
21.7%
100.0%
60.0%
55.3%
5.0%
76.0%
72.9%
50.0%
Dean
75.0%
ACAD. CATEGORIES
Res Inst Other
Dept
PI
or Ctr
Acad
8.7%
22.4%
1.6%
6.2%
3.0%
5.0%
2.0%
39.0%
6.0%
1.0%
11.0%
4.0%
35.0%
3.0%
1.0%
21.0%
7.0%
20.0%
15.0%
9.0%
25.9%
10.0%
10.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
13.0%
6.4%
12.5%
1.6%
15.0%
22.3%
8.7%
5.0%
14.0%
1.4%
3.0%
7.5%
24.0%
2.0%
1.5%
84.0%
28.0%
10.0%
10.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
30.5%
100.0%
13.0% 100.0%
100.0%
20.0%
21.0%
95.0%
7.0%
18.4%
0.7%
TOTAL
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
81.1% 100.0%
32.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
2.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
9.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
10.0% 100.0%
100.0%
Page 2 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution (plus detailed notes)
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Michigan, U of
Minnesota, U of
Mississippi State U.
Missouri, U of
Montana State U
Nebraska, U of, (Lincoln)
Nevada, Las Vegas, U of
New Hampshire, U of
New Jersey Inst. of Technology
New Mexico State U.
New Mexico, U of
New York U. (Wash Square)
North Carolina State U.
North Dakota, U of
Northern Illinois U.
Northwestern U.
Notre Dame, U of
Ohio State U.
Oklahoma State U.
Oklahoma, U of
Old Dominion U. RF
Oregon Health & Sciences U.
Oregon State U.
Oregon, U of
Pennsylvania State U.
Pennsylvania, U of
Princeton U.
Purdue U.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
Rice U.
Rockefeller U.
South Florida, U of
Southern Illinois U.
Stanford U.
Stevens Inst. of Technology
ADMIN
50.5%
60.0%
75.0%
55.0%
69.0%
19.0%
8.0%
100.0%
40.5%
56.0%
ACAD
100.0%
49.5%
40.0%
25.0%
45.0%
31.0%
81.0%
92.0%
Central
Adm
50.5%
40.0%
75.0%
13.0%
ADMIN. CATEGORIES
VP of
O&M,
Res
Plant Library
Other
Admin
20.0%
55.0%
21.0%
15.0%
8.0%
10.0%
100.0%
9.0%
25.9%
40.0%
82.0%
9.0%
4.1%
10.0%
25.0%
3.0%
10.0%
53.0%
65.1%
33.5%
34.9%
66.5%
50.1%
32.0%
15.0%
1.5%
34.9%
7.1%
83.0%
17.0%
15.0%
68.0%
17.0%
100.0%
55.0%
80.0%
48.1%
72.6%
45.0%
20.0%
51.9%
27.4%
45.0%
50.0%
4.8%
72.6%
10.0%
30.0%
10.6%
45.0%
2.0%
46.6%
27.4%
100.0%
100.0%
1.7% 100.0%
100.0%
48.2%
51.8%
12.6%
20.5%
19.0%
94.9%
100.0%
90.0%
83.0%
81.0%
5.1%
94.9%
10.0%
17.0%
90.0%
83.0%
70.0%
70.0%
30.0%
30.0%
30.0%
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
100.0%
4.0%
0.0%
24.4%
40.0%
25.0%
27.0%
44.0%
32.7%
11.2%
2.5%
1.4%
19.0%
14.4%
74.6%
17.0%
70.0%
40.0%
19.0%
40.4%
18.0%
3.6%
24.8%
81.0%
11.0%
59.5%
TOTAL
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
1.0% 100.0%
41.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
59.5%
44.0%
100.0%
1.5%
0.6%
4.0%
Dean
100.0%
49.5%
ACAD. CATEGORIES
Res Inst Other
Dept
PI
or Ctr
Acad
10.0%
5.0%
27.0%
3.4%
1.7%
5.5%
3.0%
10.0%
25.0%
10.0%
1.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Page 3 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution (plus detailed notes)
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
SUNY, Albany
SUNY, at Buffalo
SUNY, Binghamton
SUNY, Buffalo State
SUNY, EnvSci and Forestry
SUNY, HSC at Brooklyn
SUNY, Stony Brook
SUNY, Syracuse HSC
Syracuse U.
Tennessee, U of (Health Sciences)
Tennessee, U of (Knoxville)
Texas A&M U. System
Texas Tech U.
Texas, U of (Austin)
Texas, U of, M.D. Anderson Med Ctr
Texas, U of, SW Medical Center
Thomas Jefferson U.
Tufts U. (Health Sciences)
Tulane U.
Utah State U.
Utah, U of
Vanderbilt U.
Vermont, U of
Virginia Commonwealth U.
Virginia Tech
Virginia, U of
Wake Forest U. Health Sciences
Washington State U
Washington U. (St. Louis)
Washington, U of (Seattle)
Wayne State U.
West Virginia U.
Wisconsin, U of
Yale U.
ADMIN ACAD
69.8% 30.2%
57.2% 42.8%
60.5% 39.5%
91.1%
8.9%
78.6% 21.4%
73.5% 26.5%
72.6% 27.4%
30.2% 69.8%
37.0% 63.0%
91.5%
8.5%
60.0% 40.0%
56.6% 43.4%
73.0% 27.0%
100.0%
35.7%
40.3%
53.2%
29.0%
100.0%
68.3% 31.7%
75.0% 25.0%
70.0% 30.0%
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
ADMIN. CATEGORIES
VP of
O&M,
Other
Res
Plant Library Admin
8.9%
12.5%
3.0%
9.8%
1.9%
1.4%
0.2%
32.3%
8.1%
3.9%
1.6%
14.7%
0.2%
55.0%
24.8%
5.1%
3.8%
9.8%
1.7%
14.8%
14.5%
9.8%
0.3%
33.5%
12.1%
3.1%
1.0%
11.0%
3.0%
3.0%
1.5%
20.0%
5.9%
73.0%
4.3%
0.1%
3.7%
Dean
5.5%
25.0%
0.8%
14.0%
3.8%
69.8%
13.0%
2.0%
40.0%
8.5%
27.0%
ACAD. CATEGORIES
Res Inst Other
Dept
PI
or Ctr
Acad
1.2%
9.1%
13.9%
0.5%
3.1%
0.4%
8.6%
5.7%
3.4%
6.8%
7.6%
21.7%
2.4%
5.7%
12.2%
8.1%
0.8%
0.3%
1.0%
6.5%
5.0%
9.6%
14.0%
13.0%
4.5%
2.0%
20.3%
5.9%
26.0%
1.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
70.0% 30.0%
75.0% 25.0%
100.0%
64.3%
59.7%
46.8%
100.0%
71.0%
Central
Adm
45.4%
43.9%
16.2%
19.6%
35.1%
57.0%
14.5%
15.0%
19.0%
70.0%
60.0%
42.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
70.0%
10.5%
12.9%
30.0%
30.0%
28.5%
100.0%
43.0%
20.3%
8.6%
8.8%
7.7%
21.1%
1.3%
3.0%
4.0%
17.0%
7.0%
12.4%
52.0%
70.0%
3.7%
2.9%
49.3%
10.5%
2.9%
50.1%
TOTAL
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
7.1% 100.0%
100.0%
1.5%
13.5%
100.0%
6.3%
5.2%
9.6%
25.2%
40.3%
17.9%
8.0%
91.5%
31.7%
7.2%
30.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.5% 100.0%
100.0%
30.0%
6.3%
18.2%
15.0%
8.5%
11.0%
6.8%
4.2% 100.0%
100.0%
17.1% 100.0%
100.0%
6.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Page 4 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Alabama, U of (Birmingham)
Alabama, U of (Tuscaloosa)
Arizona State U.
Arizona, U of
Arkansas, U of
Auburn, U of
Baylor College of Med
Boston College
Boston U.
Brown U.
California Inst. of Technology
California St U, Dom Hills
California St U, San Diego
California St U, Fresno
California, U of (Berkeley)
California, U of (Davis)
California, U of (Los Angeles)
California, U of (San Diego)
California, U of (San Fran)
California, U of, (Irvine)
Carnegie Mellon U.
Case Western Reserve U.
Chicago, U of
Children's Hosp Phil, Stokes Res Inst
Cincinnati, U of
City of Hope, Beckman Res Inst
City U. of New York
Clemson U.
Colorado State U.
Colorado, U of (Boulder)
Colorado, U of (Health Sciences)
Columbia U.
Connecticut, U of, (Storrs)
Connecticut, U of, (Health Sci Ctr)
Cornell U. (Ithaca)
Cog.
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Region
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
SF
SF
Dallas
Mid-Atl
Dallas
NY
NY
NY
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
Dallas
Dallas
Mid-Atl
Dallas
SF
NY
Mid-Atl
SF
SF
SF
NY
NY
NY
NY
Public/
Private
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Pvt-Pub
MTDC,
All Spn Med.
Land
(Cat.) School Grant Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
4
Yes
1
Yes Each Dean makes distribution to the Depts and PIs based on the policy of
3
4
Yes
Yes Central Adm includes Provost (9.18%), G&A Admin (9.64%), and Stu
1
Yes Other Admin - Distributions to the Clinton School of Public Service, th
1
Yes
4
Yes
1
4
Yes
Boston University is comprised of two campuses. The Charles River
2
Yes
The Medical School is permitted to retain 90% of their recovered F&A
3
1
Yes
2
SDSU Research Foundation (an auxiliary of SDSU) accepts and adm
1
Expenses related to sponsored programs are deducted from the F&A
4
Yes Internal Distribution of F&A: We have no specific percentage formula
5
Yes
Yes
5
Yes
Yes Internal distribution to Central Admin is to Chancellor's Office; funds r
5
Yes
Yes
5
Yes
"Central Admin" only includes amounts distributed to the campus.
5
Yes
3
F/A revenue is not distributed to the university depts based on A-21 f
4
Yes
4
Yes
2
5
Yes
Res Ctr-Lab Animal Med receives all F&A charged on its charges.
1
1
2
Yes
3
Yes Of the total F&A recovery, $400K is taken off the top for funding the R
5
3
Yes
Each Deans Office distributes to dept or PI at their own discretion.
5
Yes
F&A is recorded as revenue in the school which owns the project(s) t
2
Yes
2
Yes
Yes
4
Yes
Page 5 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
the individual college/school.
INSTITUTION NAME
Alabama, U of (Tuscaloosa)
udent Services (0.63%). VP of Res includes Sponsored Projects Adm (2.3%) and Eqp (8.45%).
he Criminal Justice Institute and Archeological Survey. (they keep 100%)
Arizona, U of
Arkansas, U of
r Campus returns 12.5% of the F&A generated to the Dean's of each
A. All other recovery is returned to Central Admin. and added to general operating income
Boston U.
Brown U.
ministers all grants and contracts on behalf of SDSU. The majority of the F&A recovery pays
A indirect recovery. The surplus is given to the Provost for Academic Affairs.
a. Some is used for debt service, some is incorporated in the general fund, other amounts
California St U, San Diego
California St U, Fresno
California, U of (Berkeley)
redistributed to campus orgs based on strategic priorities.
California, U of (Los Angeles)
"Other Admin" is the amt distributed to the UC systemwide office.
California, U of (San Fran)
function. All revenues (F/A recovery, gifts, tuition, etc.) are combined and distributed
Carnegie Mellon U.
Research Building Revolving Fund (RBRF) and $250K is taken off the top for the Senior Vice
Colorado State U.
that generated the F&A.
Columbia U.
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Notes
continued
on following
pages
Page 6 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
Arizona, U of
Plant includes Bldg Depr (1.41%), Interest (10.52%) and O&M (20.65%). As a practical matter, most of the 35.2% F&A
Boston U.
Some of those $s are then distributed to individual depts and/or investigators as determined by the School. Approx. ano
California St U, San Diego
California St U, Fresno
California, U of (Berkeley)
for the operating costs of the Research Foundation and some is returned back to the Deans, Depts, and PI's.
The distribution varies from year to year.
allocated based on need and availability of funds.
California, U of (Los Angeles)
Internal distribution to Other Admin is to UC Office of the President; some funds redistributed to campus as state funding offse
California, U of (San Fran)
The "Dean" amount is the distrib to all acad units, including depts, PIs, research inst & ctrs, etc. UCSF distributes F&A to the D
Carnegie Mellon U.
to depts based on the univ. budget model. Current year budgets are developed based on prior year budgets plus a growth proj
Colorado State U.
President (Provost). The remaining dollars are distributed by percent to Central, VP for Research, and the Colleges (Deans).
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Page 7 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
that's distributed to deans is passed to depts. The decision as to "how much", however, is made at the college level.
other 7% of total F&A generated is distributed to individual depts based on special arrangements. The Medical Campus
is comprised of 3 Schools. Each retains 100% of F&A generated centrally and does not distribute further.
INSTITUTION NAME
Arizona, U of
Boston U.
ts. Internal distribution to Deans may be further redistributed within his/her organization.
California, U of (Los Angeles)
Deans' Offc The Deans' Offcs are free to further distr to depts, PIs, etc.at their discretion. The 47.8% of "Plant" breaks as:
12.7% O&M of Plant, 12.4% Fac related Debt Srv pay, 22.7% Plant Prjcts (Facilities constr. and renovs).
jection and any special base or one time requests. Some scientific acad. units have "deals" whereby they receive a %
of their F/A recovery (in theory to cover their DA costs) in addition to their budget, but these are exceptions.
California, U of (San Fran)
The Colleges can then in turn decide if they want to distribute their portion to the departments
want to distribute their portion to the depts and/or the PIs. Each College has its own rules for distribution.
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Carnegie Mellon U.
Colorado State U.
Page 8 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Dartmouth College
Dayton, U of
Denver, U of
Duke U.
Florida State U.
Florida, U of
Fox Chase Cancer Center
George Mason U.
George Washington U.
Georgetown U.
Georgia Inst. of Technology
Georgia, Medical College of
Harvard Medical School
Harvard U.
Harvard, Public Health
Idaho, U of
Illinois, U of (Urbana)
Indiana U.
Iowa State U
Iowa, U of
Johns Hopkins U.
Kansas St U.
Kansas, U of
Kentucky, U of
Lehigh U.
Louisiana State U. Health Sci (N.O.)
Louisville, U of
Loyola U.
Maryland, U of (College Park)
Massachusetts Inst. of Technology
Massachusetts, U of (Amherst)
Med and Dentistry of NJ, U of
Medical U. of South Carolina
Miami, U of
Michigan State U.
Cog.
HHS
ONR
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Region
NY
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
NY
NY
NY
SF
Dallas
Dallas
Dallas
Mid-Atl
Dallas
Dallas
Mid-Atl
Dallas
Mid-Atl
Dallas
Mid-Atl
NY
NY
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
Dallas
Public/
Private
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Public
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
MTDC,
All Spn Med.
Land
(Cat.) School Grant Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
3
Yes
School of A & S distributes 8% of the Dean's share back to PI on a tw
1
1
5
Yes
Other Academic is to support the Operating Budgets for each School
3
Yes
For Internal Distribution of F&A, Dept is inclusive of Research Institut
4
Yes
Yes
2
1
3
Yes
GW does not make an internal distribution of F&A as such
3
Yes
5
1
Yes
The Research Institute distributes approximately 1/3rd of its portion b
3
Yes
3
2
Yes
There is no formal distribution of F&A to departments at HSPH. The
1
Yes
4
Yes Percentages above reflect initial allocation of budgeted F&A recoveri
3
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
2
Yes Other Admin includes Continuing Ed., Extension Director, Ag Exp. St
2
3
Yes
Yes Other Acad includes Teaching Assts, Post Doc Fellows (minorities an
1
1
Yes
3
Yes
Other Acad is the Scholar program which is funded by the Senior VP
1
Yes
The F&A recovery is managed by each school and central admin. Th
4
Yes
5
MIT does not distribute F&A internally.
2
Yes
4
Yes
7 Schools distribute funds independently.
2
Yes
The F&A distribution represents our current FY07 distribution. The C
3
Yes
3
Yes
Yes
Page 9 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
wo year rolling average
INSTITUTION NAME
Dartmouth College
l's Academic and Research Programs.
tes and Centers.
Duke U.
Florida State U.
back to the PIs. The Dean determines the distribution made to the department
Georgia, Medical College of
F& A recovery and other revenues fund the school's budget.
Harvard, Public Health
es, not where funds will be expended. "Central Adm" is the sum of campus ICR
Illinois, U of (Urbana)
Notes
continued
on following
tation, Engineering Exp.Station, Provost, EPA EPSCOR, DEPSCOR admin offices
Kansas St U.
nd women in underrepresented areas). Other Admin includes consult., F&A, etc.
Kentucky, U of
P. For Research. The Scholar Program is to recruit external faculty to the Univ.
here is no formal distribution method used to allocate the F&A among the depts.
Louisville, U of
Loyola U.
College usually distributes a portion of their F&A to the department level,
Medical U. of South Carolina
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
pages
Page 10 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
Georgia, Medical College of
Approximately 17% of the Dean's amount is returned to the PIs.
Illinois, U of (Urbana)
allocated to University administration and campus reserves. The 1.4% in "Res Inst or Ctr" is the State Surveys.
Loyola U.
It is reinvested to fund research projects and facility renovations in various schools.
Medical U. of South Carolina
but it is not part of the primary distribution.
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
"Other Academic" is distributed by the Provost. Approxim
Page 11 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
mately 2% of this amount is returned to the PIs.
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
INSTITUTION NAME
Georgia, Medical College of
Page 12 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Michigan, U of
Minnesota, U of
Mississippi State U.
Missouri, U of
Montana State U
Nebraska, U of, (Lincoln)
Nevada, Las Vegas, U of
New Hampshire, U of
New Jersey Inst. of Technology
New Mexico State U.
New Mexico, U of
New York U. (Wash Square)
North Carolina State U.
North Dakota, U of
Northern Illinois U.
Northwestern U.
Notre Dame, U of
Ohio State U.
Oklahoma State U.
Oklahoma, U of
Old Dominion U. RF
Oregon Health & Sciences U.
Oregon State U.
Oregon, U of
Pennsylvania State U.
Pennsylvania, U of
Princeton U.
Purdue U.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
Rice U.
Rockefeller U.
South Florida, U of
Southern Illinois U.
Stanford U.
Stevens Inst. of Technology
Cog.
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
ONR
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Region
Dallas
Dallas
Mid-Atl
Dallas
SF
Dallas
SF
NY
NY
Dallas
NY
Mid-Atl
SF
Dallas
Dallas
Dallas
Dallas
Dallas
Mid-Atl
SF
SF
SF
NY
NY
Dallas
Dallas
NY
Mid-Atl
Dallas
Public/
Private
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Public
Pvt
Pvt
MTDC,
All Spn Med.
Land
(Cat.) School Grant Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
5
Yes
The dean has the option to distribute all, some or none of the ICR to
5
Yes
Yes
3
Yes
3
Yes
Yes
2
Yes
2
Yes We distribute to deans (colleges), who in turn may distribute to depar
1
We are revising FY07 to 48% VPR, 40% Deans, 4% Provost, 4% P
2
Yes
1
At this time, F&A recovery money is not separately distributed to any
3
Yes Budget office distributes funds to departmental units and distribution
3
Yes
Health Science Center distributes F&A 50% to VP and 50% to Dean.
2
3
Yes The Vice Chancellor for Research takes 15% of all FA Revenues off
1
Yes
FY06 F&A not yet allocated, so distribution % is based on FY05 alloc
1
4
Yes
2
The VP of Research portion is used toward lab renovations and start4
Yes
Yes Five years ago the Univ. began responsibility-based budgeting. Since
2
Yes The following are exceptions to the internal distribution of F&A stated
3
Department distributes to PI per their department policy.
1
Internal Distribution - "Other Admin" is actual operating cost for the R
3
Yes
2
Yes 26% of recovery is distributed to the college dean. Further distributio
2
Other Admin=Development Office
Other Academic=Conti
4
Yes
5
Yes
2
3
Yes
1
90% of the F&A stays in central admin; the remaining 10% can be sp
1
2
The Rockefeller University maintains one pool account for F&A recov
3
Yes
Standard split is 70% VP Research, 10% Dean, 10% Department, 10
2
Yes
5
Yes
1
Page 13 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
the Unit and/or PI. Practice varies across units.
rtments and/or PIs.
President, 4% Libraries. FY06 distrib. = 25% to research infra-structure,
particular unit of the Univ. It is included as part of the unrestricted operating budget
to Dean, Dept, PI, Res Inst or Ctr and Other Acad based on department discretion.
Main Campus F&A distribution to colleges, centers, and depts varies.
INSTITUTION NAME
Michigan, U of
Nebraska, U of, (Lincoln)
Nevada, Las Vegas, U of
New Jersey Inst. of Technology
New Mexico State U.
New Mexico, U of
the top. The amount left is distributed as follows:
cations.
North Carolina State U.
t-up costs.
The Dean's portion is distributed between the Dean's office,
e that time, marginal changes in F&A have been distributed annually to the colleges
d above:
College of Veterinary Health Sciences: 10% to VP of Res; 90% to Dean
Notre Dame, U of
Ohio State U.
Oklahoma State U.
Research Foundation (separate corporation) remaining recovery is distributed to the
Old Dominion U. RF
on to the dept and/or PI varies with the college. 3% is distributed to the Univ. System
inuing Education
Oregon State U.
Oregon, U of
plit in several ways. The primary split is 55%-PI's Dept, 30%-PI.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
very; it is difficult to estimate FY06 internal distribution of F&A for this survey.
0% PI and Co-PI's; some exceptions may occur (e.g. PI start-up).
Rockefeller U.
South Florida, U of
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Notes
continued
on following
pages
Page 14 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
Nevada, Las Vegas, U of
4% to Pres., 4% to Provost, 15% to VPR, 8% to Reserve, 4% to Library, 40% to Deans.
North Carolina State U.
58.9%-Central Administration. 41.1%-Dean of the College. The Dean off each college is responsible for allocated their portion
Notre Dame, U of
Ohio State U.
Oklahoma State U.
the Department, and the PI. Percentages vary by College.
(less the library portion which is distributed directly to the libraries). The base F&A is part of university base budgets. No data is
Center for Innovation & Economic Development: 5% to VP of Res; 35% to Dean; 60% to Center.
Old Dominion U. RF
University's Central Adm and to Deans (who distribute to Dept/PI at their discretion).
Oregon State U.
for centralized services. Except for A-21 requirement to reserve and expend for research building renovations and equipment
Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
The remaining 15% is distributed to either the Center, Provost or VP for Research.
Rockefeller U.
However, the FY06 F&A recovery may be used to develop the University's FY07 internal laboratory and departmental budgets
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Page 15 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
INSTITUTION NAME
n to the department heads and PI's.
North Carolina State U.
s available to apportion F&A into the categories listed above
Ohio State U.
t replacement, the balance of the recovery is in a complex budget distribution process and not known.
Oregon State U.
next Spring
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Rockefeller U.
Page 16 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
SUNY, Albany
SUNY, at Buffalo
SUNY, Binghamton
SUNY, Buffalo State
SUNY, EnvSci and Forestry
SUNY, HSC at Brooklyn
SUNY, Stony Brook
SUNY, Syracuse HSC
Syracuse U.
Tennessee, U of (Health Sciences)
Tennessee, U of (Knoxville)
Texas A&M U. System
Texas Tech U.
Texas, U of (Austin)
Texas, U of, M.D. Anderson Med Ctr
Texas, U of, SW Medical Center
Thomas Jefferson U.
Tufts U. (Health Sciences)
Tulane U.
Utah State U.
Utah, U of
Vanderbilt U.
Vermont, U of
Virginia Commonwealth U.
Virginia Tech
Virginia, U of
Wake Forest U. Health Sciences
Washington State U
Washington U. (St. Louis)
Washington, U of (Seattle)
Wayne State U.
West Virginia U.
Wisconsin, U of
Yale U.
Cog.
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
ONR
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
HHS
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Region
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
Dallas
Dallas
Dallas
Dallas
Dallas
Mid-Atl
NY
Dallas
SF
Mid-Atl
NY
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
Mid-Atl
SF
Dallas
SF
Dallas
Mid-Atl
Dallas
NY
Public/
Private
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Pvt
Pvt
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
Public
Pvt
Public
Public
Public
Public
Pvt
MTDC,
All Spn Med.
Land
(Cat.) School Grant Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
2
2
Yes
1
Central Adm is the cost assessed by our corp. office for research adm
1
The remaining 5.9% balance of internal distribution of F&A goes to re
1
1
Yes
2
Yes
1
Yes
1
Internal distrib. of F&A represents budgeted distrib. at 6/30/06.
2
Yes
2
Yes
5
Yes This is a combination of all Members; each distributes different perce
2
4
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
2
Yes
2
Yes
All F&A recovery goes back to the school (at the school level, not dep
2
Yes
2
Yes Initially 70% of F&A goes to V.P. Research(VPR) for redistribution an
3
Yes
4
Yes
2
Yes
Yes We return to both the Microbio. and Molec. Genetics and the Col. of M
3
Yes
3
Yes The Deans Offices allocate their share of F&A recoveries between th
3
Yes
Central Adm distribution includes Plant as these are not separate dis
3
Yes
3
Yes Other academic is our three branch campuses.
Res Inst or
5
Yes
Arts & Sciences - 90% Dean, 10% Department
Engineering
5
Yes
Prelim. estimates: FY2006 financials are still under construction.
3
Yes
2
Yes
Yes Dean receives 30% and has the flexibility to share this with the depar
5
Yes
Yes
5
Yes
Page 17 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
INSTITUTION NAME
min activities. Campus research admin costs are distributed under the VP for Res.
eserves.
(included in Other Admin).
SUNY, Binghamton
SUNY, Buffalo State
entages based on internal decisions.
Texas A&M U. System
Notes
pt nor PI level) were the grant resides.
Tufts U. (Health Sciences)
nd 30% is shared between the Dean/Department/P.I./Research Center.
Utah State U.
Med. 30% of the FA recovery which those units generate on Research accts ONLY.
Vermont, U of
heir offices, the departments and PI's at their discretion.
stributions. Dept and Dean distributions vary by school, these percents are blended averages.
Virginia Tech
Virginia, U of
Ctr is within dept distribution.
g - 100% Department Med School - Federal to Dean, Non Federal Split 50% Dean and
Washington State U
Washington U. (St. Louis)
rtment and PI.
West Virginia U.
If the Health Sciences Ctr generates beyond a predetermined
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
continued
on following
pages
Page 18 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
INSTITUTION NAME
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
Vermont, U of
All other units on campus receive 25% of the FA recovery from all sponsored projects (includes Instruction and Pub Srv as wel
Virginia, U of
PI's receive distributions from certain schools, but these are not distributed by central offices and vary by school. Other Acad i
Washington U. (St. Louis)
50% Department F&A recovery goes to the Dean at all other schools.
West Virginia U.
base then the split is reversed. (i.e. Central Adm - 30% and Dean - 70%)
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
Page 19 of 20
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery Reports, Report 2
Internal Distribution of F&A Recovery by Institution
2005-2006 COGR Survey
Notes on Internal Distribution of F&A:
ll as Research).
There is no direct relationship between the FA recovery and the budgets for the SPA units.
for capital outlay on research support projects. Other Admin includes IT and OSP.
s the reserve we set aside
The Plant distributions separately identified are for Environmental Health and Safety (Haz Wst Disposal).
© Council on Governmental Relations, 2007
INSTITUTION NAME
Vermont, U of
Virginia, U of
Page 20 of 20