Print Report Card
Submit Reports View Reports / Resources Technical Assistance Contacts / Help
Instructions
Institution Information
Section I.a Program Information
Section I.b Admissions
Section I.b Undergraduate
Requirements
Section I.b Postgraduate
Requirements
Section I.c Enrollment
Section I.d Supervised Clinical
Experience
Section I.e Teachers Prepared by
Subject Area
Section I.e Teachers Prepared by
Academic Major
Section I.f Program Completers
Section II Annual Goals - Mathematics
Section II Annual Goals - Science
Section II Annual Goals - Special
Education
Section II Annual Goals - LEP
Section II Assurances
Section III Assessment Pass Rates
Section III Summary Pass Rates
Section IV Low-Performing
Section V Use of Technology
Section VI Teacher Training
Section VII Contextual Information
Section VIII Report Card Certification
Change Program
Account Information
Glossary
Contact Us
Program Management
Program Status Report
No
Institution/Program Type: Alternative, IHE-based
If yes, provide the following:
Grantee name:
Project name:
Academic Year: 2011-12
State: California
Phone: 858-642-8314
Email: cmiles@nu.edu
Name of Institution: National University
Address: 11255 N. Torrey Pines Road
La Jolla, CA, 92037
Contact Name: Mrs. Cyndy Miles
-
-
National University
Alternative, IHE-based Program
2011-12
Is your institution a member of an HEA Title II Teacher Quality Partnership (TQP) grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Education?
( http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/tqp/index.html
)
Award year:
Grant number: https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Institution Login Report
User Activity List partner districts/LEAs:
List other partners:
Project Type:
List each teacher preparation program included in your alternative, ihe-based route. Indicate if your program or programs participate in a Teacher Quality Partnership Grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Education as described at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/tqp/index.html
.
Teacher Preparation Programs
Multiple Subject
Single Subject
Special Education
Total number of teacher preparation programs: 3
Teacher Quality
Partnership Grant
Member?
No
No
No
Indicate when students are formally admitted into your initial teacher certification program:
Other Open enrollment any month.
Does your initial teacher certification program conditionally admit students?
Yes
Provide a link to your website where additional information about admissions requirements can be found: http://www.nu.edu/Admissions.html
Please provide any additional about or exceptions to the admissions information provided above:
Graduate Admission Exceptions:
Students with an undergraduate grade point average of 2.0 to 2.49 may be accepted to National University on probation (instead of taking the above tests). Students who receive a grade below "B" during their first
4.5 quarter units while on probation are disqualified and must apply to the Committee on the Application of
Standards to be considered for reinstatement.
Undergraduate Admission Exceptions:
The Internship program is for post-graduates only.
Please provide the following information about your teacher preparation program's entry and exit requirements. ( §205(a)(1)(C)(i) ) https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Are there initial teacher certification programs at the undergraduate level?
No
If yes, for each element listed below, indicate if it is required for admission into or exit from any of your teacher preparation program(s) at the Undergraduate level.
Element
Required for
Entry
Transcript
Fingerprint check
Background check
Minimum number of courses/credits/semester hours completed
Minimum GPA
Minimum GPA in content area coursework
Minimum GPA in professional education coursework
Minimum ACT score
Minimum SAT score
Minimum basic skills test score
Subject area/academic content test or other subject matter verification
Recommendation(s)
Essay or personal statement
Interview
Other
What is the minimum GPA required for admission into the program?
What was the median GPA of individuals accepted into the program in academic year 2011-12
What is the minimum GPA required for completing the program?
What was the median GPA of individuals completing the program in academic year 2011-12
Required for
Exit
Please provide the following information about your teacher preparation program's entry and exit requirements. ( §205(a)(1)(C)(i) )
Are there initial teacher certification programs at the postgraduate level?
Yes
If yes, for each element listed below, indicate if it is required for admission into or exit from any of your teacher preparation program(s) at the Postgraduate level.
Element
Required for
Entry
Required for
Exit https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Transcript
Fingerprint check
Background check
Minimum number of courses/credits/semester hours completed
Minimum GPA
Minimum GPA in content area coursework
Minimum GPA in professional education coursework
Minimum ACT score
Minimum SAT score
Minimum basic skills test score
Subject area/academic content test or other subject matter verification
Recommendation(s)
Essay or personal statement
Interview
Other
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
What is the minimum GPA required for admission into the program?
3
What was the median GPA of individuals accepted into the program in academic year 2011-12
0
What is the minimum GPA required for completing the program?
3
What was the median GPA of individuals completing the program in academic year 2011-12
3.67
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Provide the number of students in the teacher preparation program in the following categories. Note that you must report on the number of students by ethnicity and race separately. Individuals who are non-Hispanic/Latino will be reported in one of the race categories. Also note that individuals can belong to one or more racial groups, so the sum of the members of each racial category may not necessarily add up to the total number of students enrolled.
Total number of students enrolled in 2011-12:
Unduplicated number of males enrolled in 2011-12:
207
95
Unduplicated number of females enrolled in 2011-12: 110
2011-12 Number enrolled https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latino of any race:
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native:
Asian:
Black or African American:
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander:
White:
Two or more races:
43
0
4
14
0
66
13
Provide the following information about supervised clinical experience in 2011-12.
Average number of clock hours of supervised clinical experience required prior to student teaching 30
Average number of clock hours required for student teaching
Average number of clock hours required for mentoring/induction support
0
640
11 Number of full-time equivalent faculty supervising clinical experience during this academic year
Number of adjunct faculty supervising clinical experience during this academic year (IHE and
PreK-12 staff)
Number of students in supervised clinical experience during this academic year
100
194
Please provide any additional information about or descriptions of the supervised clinical experiences:
Please provide the number of teachers prepared by subject area for academic year 2011-12.
For the purposes of this section, number prepared means the number of program completers. "Subject area" refers to the subject area(s) an individual has been prepared to teach. An individual can be counted in more than one subject area. If no individuals were prepared in a particular subject area, please leave that cell blank. (§205(b)(1)(H))
Subject Area
Education - General
Teacher Education - Special Education
Teacher Education - Early Childhood Education
Teacher Education - Elementary Education
Teacher Education - Junior High/Intermediate/Middle School Education
Teacher Education - Secondary Education
Teacher Education - Multiple Levels
Teacher Education - Agriculture
Number Prepared
103
13
49 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Teacher Education - Art
Teacher Education - Business
Teacher Education - English/Language Arts
Teacher Education - Foreign Language
Teacher Education - Health
Teacher Education - Family and Consumer Sciences/Home Economics
Teacher Education - Technology Teacher Education/Industrial Arts
Teacher Education - Mathematics
Teacher Education - Music
Teacher Education - Physical Education and Coaching
Teacher Education - Reading
Teacher Education - Science Teacher Education/General Science
Teacher Education - Social Science
Teacher Education - Social Studies
Teacher Education - Technical Education
Teacher Education - Computer Science
Teacher Education - Biology
Teacher Education - Chemistry
Teacher Education - Drama and Dance
Teacher Education - French
Teacher Education - German
Teacher Education- History
Teacher Education - Physics
Teacher Education - Spanish
Teacher Education - Speech
Teacher Education - Geography
Teacher Education - Latin
Teacher Education - Psychology
Teacher Education - Earth Science
Teacher Education - English as a Second Language
Teacher Education - Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education
Education - Other
Specify: Foudational Level Math-5, Punjabi-1
Please provide the number of teachers prepared by academic major for academic year 2011-
12. For the purposes of this section, number prepared means the number of program https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
2
2
3
1
1
11
4
6
7
3
5
1
4
1
2
10
4
3
Print Report Card completers. "Academic major" refers to the actual major(s) declared by the program completer. An individual can be counted in more than one academic major. If no individuals were prepared in a particular academic major, please leave that cell blank. (§205(b)(1)(H))
Academic Major
Education - General
Teacher Education - Special Education
Teacher Education - Early Childhood Education
Teacher Education - Elementary Education
Teacher Education - Junior High/Intermediate/Middle School Education
Teacher Education - Secondary Education
Teacher Education - Agriculture
Teacher Education - Art
Teacher Education - Business
Teacher Education - English/Language Arts
Number Prepared
6
2
1
3
3
Teacher Education - Foreign Language
Teacher Education - Health
Teacher Education - Family and Consumer Sciences/Home Economics
Teacher Education - Technology Teacher Education/Industrial Arts
Teacher Education - Mathematics
Teacher Education - Music
Teacher Education - Physical Education and Coaching
Teacher Education - Reading
Teacher Education - Science
Teacher Education - Social Science
Teacher Education - Social Studies
Teacher Education - Technical Education
Teacher Education - Computer Science
Teacher Education - Biology
Teacher Education - Chemistry
Teacher Education - Drama and Dance
Teacher Education - French
Teacher Education - German
Teacher Education - History
Teacher Education - Physics
Teacher Education - Spanish
Teacher Education - Speech
1
3
2
4 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Teacher Education - Geography
Teacher Education - Latin
Teacher Education - Psychology
Teacher Education - Earth Science
Teacher Education - English as a Second Language
Teacher Education - Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education
Education - Curriculum and Instruction
Education - Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education
Liberal Arts/Humanities
Psychology
Social Sciences
Anthropology
Economics
Geography and Cartography
Political Science and Government
Sociology
Visual and Performing Arts
History
Foreign Languages
Family and Consumer Sciences/Human Sciences
English Language/Literature
Philosophy and Religious Studies
Agriculture
Communication or Journalism
Engineering
Biology
Mathematics and Statistics
Physical Sciences
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology
Chemistry
Geological and Earth Sciences/Geosciences
Physics
Business/Business Administration/Accounting
Computer and Information Sciences
Other https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
11
6
1
7
2
6
5
1
4
30
24
3
1
2
1
2
4
2
10
1
39
Print Report Card
Specify: See contextual information section.
Provide the total number of teacher preparation program completers in each of the following academic years:
2011-12: 165
2010-11: 274
2009-10: 371
Each institution of higher education (IHE) that conducts a traditional teacher preparation program (including programs that offer any ongoing professional development programs) or alternative route to state credential program, and that enrolls students receiving Federal assistance under this Act, shall set annual quantifiable goals for increasing the number of prospective teachers trained in teacher shortage areas designated by the Secretary or by the state educational agency, including mathematics, science, special education, and instruction of limited English proficient students. ( §205(a)(1)(A)(ii), §206(a) )
Information about teacher shortage areas can be found at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/pol/tsa.html
.
Please provide the information below about your program's goals to increase the number of prospective teachers in mathematics in each of three academic years.
Academic year 2011-12
Did your program prepare teachers in mathematics in 2011-12?
Yes
How many prospective teachers did your program plan to add in mathematics in 2011-12?
10
Did your program meet the goal for prospective teachers set in mathematics in 2011-12?
No
Description of strategies used to achieve goal, if applicable:
National University continues to promote its credentialing programs, including internship options via
1) Our outreach activities and communications with districts and other educational agencies in the state;
2) Our distributive, accelerated adult learning program allows us to reach interns in highly remote areas, in high-need urban schools, in geographically bound shortage areas in subjects such as math, science, English for English Language Learners.
3) Our online, onsite and hybrid models of delivery for candidates seeking to teach in California public schools
4) Our candidates serve K-12 students in Math instruction placed in traditional public schools; charter schools, non-traditional school settings across the state.
https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
5) Our Early Completion Option (Intern) credential which allows candidates to teach Math if they can verify passing grade on Teacher Foundations Examination (TFE).
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned in meeting goal, if applicable:
In order to improve performance in meeting our goal, we need to proactively conduct the following initiatives:
4.1. Target engineers as Late Entrants into Teaching Profession in private and public industries and corporations to promote an effective bridge for career change. Provide information on subject matter competence or waivers, transcript services, orientation in their place of work and connect them to our university system.
4.2. Target Math Majors in 4-year institutions for a post-graduate, viable way to obtain a Math teaching credential to teach.
4.3. Target female Math Majors in 2- year and 4-year institutions for a post-graduate, viable way to obtain a
Math teaching credential to teach.
4.4. Target Minority Math Majors in 2- year and 4-year institutions for a post-graduate, viable way to obtain a Math teaching credential to teach in public schools.
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
Academic year 2012-13
Is your program preparing teachers in mathematics in 2012-13?
Yes
How many prospective teachers did your program plan to add in mathematics in 2012-13?
15
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
2.1 Our overall enrollment of Teacher Education Interns has substantially decreased in the last three years due to an oversupply of fully credentialed teachers without jobs. By law, no intern can be hired in place of a fully credentialed teacher, and thus, our enrollment has decreased. 2.2 Offers of public school employment for our interns have continued to increase in conventional and non-conventional charter schools as opposed to traditional public schools in the area of mathematics.
Academic year 2013-14
Will your program prepare teachers in mathematics in 2013-14?
Yes
How many prospective teachers does your program plan to add in mathematics in 2013-14?
20
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
2013/2014 may experience a strong increase in intern enrollment pending teacher retirements and implementation of Class Size Reduction (CSR) as per Governor Brown’s Local Control Funding Formula proposed legislation in April 2013.
Internship Credentials will be issued for candidates seeking Single Subject Mathematics Credential as the https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card demand continues.
Each institution of higher education (IHE) that conducts a traditional teacher preparation program (including programs that offer any ongoing professional development programs) or alternative route to state credential program, and that enrolls students receiving Federal assistance under this Act, shall set annual quantifiable goals for increasing the number of prospective teachers trained in teacher shortage areas designated by the Secretary or by the state educational agency, including mathematics, science, special education, and instruction of limited English proficient students. ( §205(a)(1)(A)(ii), §206(a) )
Information about teacher shortage areas can be found at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/pol/tsa.html
.
Please provide the information below about your program's goals to increase the number of prospective teachers in science in each of three academic years.
Academic year 2011-12
Did your program prepare teachers in science in 2011-12?
Yes
How many prospective teachers did your program plan to add in science in 2011-12?
5
Did your program meet the goal for prospective teachers set in science in 2011-12?
No
Description of strategies used to achieve goal, if applicable:
1) Our outreach activities and communications with districts and other educational agencies in the state;
2) Our distributive, accelerated adult learning program allows us to reach interns in highly remote areas, in high-need urban schools, in geographically bound shortage areas in subjects such as math, science, English for English Language Learners.
3) Our online, onsite and hybrid models of delivery for candidates seeking to teach in California public schools
4) Our candidates serve K-12 students in Math instruction placed in traditional public schools; charter schools, non-traditional school settings across the state.
5) Our Early Completion Option (Intern) credential which allows candidates to teach Science if they can verify passing grade on Teacher Foundations Examination (TFE).
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned in meeting goal, if applicable:
National University contracts with districts throughout the state of California and prides itself on timely processing of intern applications. Our flexible four week course format enables us to offer our intern preservice coursework throughout the year and respond quickly to the needs of our students and the districts we are in partnership with. We will work more closely with the districts.
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below: https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Our overall enrollment of Teacher Education Interns has substantially decreased in the last three years due to an oversupply of fully credentialed teachers without jobs. By law, no intern can be hired in place of a fully credentialed teacher, and thus, our enrollment has decreased. Offers of public school employment for our interns have continued to increase in conventional and non-conventional charter schools as opposed to traditional public schools in the area of Science.
Academic year 2012-13
Is your program preparing teachers in science in 2012-13?
Yes
How many prospective teachers did your program plan to add in science in 2012-13?
8
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
Target engineers as Late Entrants into Teaching Profession in private and public industries and corporations to promote an effective bridge for career change. Provide information on subject matter competence or waivers, transcript services, orientation in their place of work and connect them to our university system.
4.2. Target Science Majors in 4-year institutions for a post-graduate, viable way to obtain a Science teaching credential to teach.
4.3. Target female Science Majors in 2- year and 4-year institutions for a post-graduate, viable way to obtain a Science teaching credential to teach.
4.4. Target Minority Science Majors in 2- year and 4-year institutions for a post-graduate, viable way to obtain a Science teaching credential to teach in public schools.
Academic year 2013-14
Will your program prepare teachers in science in 2013-14?
Yes
How many prospective teachers does your program plan to add in science in 2013-14?
10
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
2013/2014 may experience a strong increase in intern enrollment pending teacher retirements and implementation of Class Size Reduction (CSR) as per Governor Brown’s Local Control Funding Formula proposed legislation in April 2013.
Each institution of higher education (IHE) that conducts a traditional teacher preparation program (including programs that offer any ongoing professional development programs) or alternative route to state credential program, and that enrolls students receiving Federal assistance under this Act, shall set annual quantifiable goals for increasing the number of prospective teachers trained in teacher shortage areas designated by the Secretary or by the state educational agency, including mathematics, science, special education, and instruction of limited English proficient students. ( §205(a)(1)(A)(ii), §206(a) )
Information about teacher shortage areas can be found at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/pol/tsa.html
.
https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Please provide the information below about your program's goals to increase the number of prospective teachers in special education in each of three academic years.
Academic year 2011-12
Did your program prepare teachers in special education in 2011-12?
Yes
How many prospective teachers did your program plan to add in special education in 2011-
12?
15
Did your program meet the goal for prospective teachers set in special education in 2011-12?
No
Description of strategies used to achieve goal, if applicable:
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned in meeting goal, if applicable:
National University contracts with districts throughout the state of California and prides itself on timely processing of intern applications. Our flexible four week course format enables us to offer our intern preservice coursework throughout the year and respond quickly to the needs of our students and the districts we are in partnership with. We plan to have a more hands on relationship with the districts.
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
Academic year 2012-13
Is your program preparing teachers in special education in 2012-13?
Yes
How many prospective teachers did your program plan to add in special education in 2012-
13?
20
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
Due to the economic downturn in California, the number of teacher candidate decreased but with additional funding planned for the next fiscal year, more candidates are enrolling each month.
Academic year 2013-14
Will your program prepare teachers in special education in 2013-14?
Yes
How many prospective teachers does your program plan to add in special education in 2013-
14?
35
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below: a. The Department of Special Education is continually revising and updating courses, key assignments, and projects to ensure our candidates are highly qualified.
https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card b. Program Annual Review Data is used to inform practice and improve programs.
Each institution of higher education (IHE) that conducts a traditional teacher preparation program (including programs that offer any ongoing professional development programs) or alternative route to state credential program, and that enrolls students receiving Federal assistance under this Act, shall set annual quantifiable goals for increasing the number of prospective teachers trained in teacher shortage areas designated by the Secretary or by the state educational agency, including mathematics, science, special education, and instruction of limited English proficient students. ( §205(a)(1)(A)(ii), §206(a) )
Information about teacher shortage areas can be found at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/pol/tsa.html
.
Please provide the information below about your program's goals to increase the number of prospective teachers in instruction of limited English proficient students in each of three academic years.
Academic year 2011-12
Did your program prepare teachers in instruction of limited English proficient students in
2011-12?
Yes
How many prospective teachers did your program plan to add in instruction of limited
English proficient students in 2011-12?
175
Did your program meet the goal for prospective teachers set in instruction of limited English proficient students in 2011-12?
No
Description of strategies used to achieve goal, if applicable:
Our enrollment went down from the previous year. All candidates who complete a California teaching credential are required to meet the standards articulated by the CTC to include meeting the needs of English
Learners in acquisition of English, academic language, and content areas. National University continues to promote its credentialing programs, including internship options via
1) Our outreach activities and communications with districts and other educational agencies in the state;
2) Our distributive, accelerated adult learning program allows us to reach interns in highly remote areas, in high-need urban schools, in geographically bound shortage areas in subjects such as math, science, English for English Language Learners.
3) Our online, onsite and hybrid models of delivery for candidates seeking to teach in California public schools
4) Our candidates serve K-12 English Language Learners placed in traditional public schools; charter schools, non-traditional school settings across the state.
5) Our Early Completion Option (Intern) credential which allows candidates to teach English Language
Learners if they can verify passing grade on Teacher Foundations Examination (TFE).
https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Description of steps to improve performance in meeting goal or lessons learned in meeting goal, if applicable: a. Lessons Learned in Meeting Goal: i. Our Alternative Route to Teacher Credentialing needs to improve the preparation of candidates to meet the enhanced expectations for preparation to teach English Learners in California by April 2014 through redesigning and augmenting the pre-service hours and the supervision/support hours to teach ELLs effectively.
ii. Our Alternative Route to Teacher Credentialing needs to improve the preparation of candidates to meet the expectations of Common Core Standards (CCS)/ Newly revised English Development Standards by redesigning our program learning outcomes, course learning outcomes by Foundations, Methods and Clinical
Practice coursework.
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
Candidates seeking to add a supplementary authorization and/or credential may need to add the additional enhanced English Language Learner preparation requirements effective Apirl 2014.
Academic year 2012-13
Is your program preparing teachers in instruction of limited English proficient students in
2012-13?
Yes
How many prospective teachers did your program plan to add in instruction of limited
English proficient students in 2012-13?
180
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
Our overall enrollment of Teacher Education Interns has substantially decreased in the last three years due to an over supply of fully credentialed teachers without jobs. By law, no interns can be hired in place of a fully credentialed teacher, and thus, our enrollment has decreased.
Offers of public school employment for our interns have continued to increase in conventional and nonconventional charter schools as opposed to traditional public schools.
Academic year 2013-14
Will your program prepare teachers in instruction of limited English proficient students in
2013-14?
Yes
How many prospective teachers does your program plan to add in instruction of limited
English proficient students in 2013-14?
200
Provide any additional comments, exceptions and explanations below:
2013/2014 may experience a strong increase in intern enrollment pending teacher retirements and implementation of Class Size Reduction (CSR) as per Governor Brown’s Local Control Funding Formula proposed legislation in April 2013.
Internship Credentials will be issued for candidates seeking Multiple Subject and Single Subject Credentials https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card as the demand continues.
We foresee an increase of alternative route certifications for World Language/English Language
Development (WL/ELD) interns which is a newly created credential to serve English Language Learners in
9-12 grades.
Please certify that your institution is in compliance with the following assurances.
(§205(a)(1)(A)(iii), §206(b)) Note: Be prepared to provide documentation and evidence for your responses, when requested, to support the following assurances.
Preparation responds to the identified needs of the local educational agencies or States where the program completers are likely to teach, based on past hiring and recruitment trends.
Yes
Preparation is closely linked with the needs of schools and the instructional decisions new teachers face in the classroom.
Yes
Prospective special education teachers are prepared in core academic subjects and to instruct in core academic subjects.
Yes
Prospective general education teachers are prepared to provide instruction to students with disabilities.
Yes
Prospective general education teachers are prepared to provide instruction to limited English proficient students.
Yes
Prospective general education teachers are prepared to provide instruction to students from low-income families.
Yes
Prospective teachers are prepared to effectively teach in urban and rural schools, as applicable.
Yes
Describe your institution’s most successful strategies in meeting the assurances listed above:
In each of the past 12 years, National University has prepared more credentialed teachers than any other single institution of higher education in the state of California, according to the Commission on Teacher
Credentialing.
National University is committed to accessibility and features locations throughout San Diego County.
Regional campuses are also located in Costa Mesa, Sacramento, Redding, San Jose, Stockton, Fresno,
Bakersfield, Ontario, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Oxnard, Woodland Hills and Twenty-nine Palms, as well as Henderson, Nevada.
National University provides online options for most credential courses. Our online courses are interactive with tools to support individual learning styles including: e-mail, links between candidate, professor, and classmates, lectures, readings, presentations, evaluations, quizzes, and exams. These tools also combine to create a strong sense of community within online classes.
https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
All candidates completing our commission-approved teacher preparation programs are responsible for meeting competency in 13 Teacher Performance Expectations (TPEs) across Six Domains of Professional
Teaching. These TPEs prepare candidates in the areas of differentiated and responsive instruction for students identified as English Learners, Special Needs or from Low Income Families. Additionally, prospective general education teachers complete the California Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA).
TPA TASKS 1-4 require that our candidates show competence in designing and providing specific modifications made in instruction and assessment for a special needs learner and an English learner in addition to the rest of the class. Passing rates on the TPA tasks indicate that National University teacher candidates understand how to provide instruction to the learners noted in the assurances.
Faculty working in the regional campuses throughout the state understands the specific needs of their region. As the curriculum is designed or revised, faculty from throughout the state as well as those representing special needs areas (English learners, and special education) are involved. Prospective general education teachers complete the California Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA). The four tasks of the
TPA ask for specific modifications made in curriculum and assessment for a special needs learner and an
English learner in addition to the rest of the class. Passing rates on the TPA tasks indicate that National
University teacher candidates understand how to provide instruction to the learners noted in the assurances.
Assessment code - Assessment name
Test Company
Group
186 -AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
187 -AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
188 -AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
192 -ARABIC SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
193 -ARABIC SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
140 -ART SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
140 -ART SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
140 -ART SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
Number taking tests
Avg.
scaled score
Number passing tests
Pass rate
(%)
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
141 -ART SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
141 -ART SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
141 -ART SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
120 -BIOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
120 -BIOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
120 -BIOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
120 -BIOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
120 -BIOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
124 -BIOLOGY/LIFE SCIENCE SUBTEST IV
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
175 -BUSINESS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
175 -BUSINESS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
176 -BUSINESS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
176 -BUSINESS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
177 -BUSINESS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
177 -BUSINESS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
2
2
2
1
1
2
4
16 239 16 100
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Print Report Card
098 -CBEST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
098 -CBEST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
098 -CBEST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
098 -CBEST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
098 -CBEST
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
121 -CHEMISTRY SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
121 -CHEMISTRY SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
121 -CHEMISTRY SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
121 -CHEMISTRY SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
125 -CHEMISTRY SUBTEST IV
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
122 -EARTH/PLANETARY SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
122 -EARTH/PLANETARY SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
122 -EARTH/PLANETARY SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
126 -EARTH/PLANETARY SCIENCE SUBTEST IV
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
105 -ENGLISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
32
39
128
152
153
244 148
345
1
1
1
10
3
4
1
3
1
4
149
150
238
32 100
39 100
128 100
244 100
345 100
10 100 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
105 -ENGLISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
105 -ENGLISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
105 -ENGLISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
105 -ENGLISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
106 -ENGLISH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
106 -ENGLISH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
106 -ENGLISH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
106 -ENGLISH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
106 -ENGLISH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
107 -ENGLISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
107 -ENGLISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
107 -ENGLISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
107 -ENGLISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
107 -ENGLISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
108 -ENGLISH SUBTEST IV
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
3
8
15 232 15 100
21 244 21 100
4
3
8
15 237 15 100
21 243 21 100
4
3
8
15 242 15 100
21 241 21 100
4
Print Report Card
108 -ENGLISH SUBTEST IV
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
108 -ENGLISH SUBTEST IV
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
108 -ENGLISH SUBTEST IV
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
108 -ENGLISH SUBTEST IV
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
148 -FRENCH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
148 -FRENCH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
148 -FRENCH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
149 -FRENCH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
149 -FRENCH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
149 -FRENCH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
150 -FRENCH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
150 -FRENCH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
150 -FRENCH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
016 -HEALTH SCIENCE S
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
178 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
3
8
15 237 15 100
21 243 21 100
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Print Report Card
178 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
178 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
178 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
179 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
179 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
179 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
179 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
180 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
180 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
180 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
180 -HEALTH SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
184 -INDUSTRIAL AND TECH ED SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
184 -INDUSTRIAL AND TECH ED SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
184 -INDUSTRIAL AND TECH ED SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
184 -INDUSTRIAL AND TECH ED SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
4
7
12 232 12 100
2
4
7
12 240 12 100
2
4
7
12 245 12 100
1
2
1
2
Print Report Card
185 -INDUSTRIAL AND TECH ED SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
185 -INDUSTRIAL AND TECH ED SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
185 -INDUSTRIAL AND TECH ED SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
185 -INDUSTRIAL AND TECH ED SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
110 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
110 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
110 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
110 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
110 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
111 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
111 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
111 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
111 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
111 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
112 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
1
2
1
2
4
1
9
17 244 17 100
31 236 31 100
4
1
9
17 246 17 100
31 238 31 100
1
Print Report Card
112 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
112 -MATHEMATICS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
101 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
101 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
101 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
101 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
101 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
102 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
102 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
102 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
102 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
102 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
103 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
103 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
103 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
2
6
12 238
13 238
65 242
172 241
12 237
13 236
65 244
150 239 150 100
173 239
12 238
13 237
65 242
12 100
12 92
65 100
150 239 150 100
172 100
12 100
13 100
65 100
173 100
12 100
12 92
65 100
Print Report Card
103 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
103 -MULTIPLE SUBJECTS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
136 -MUSIC SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
136 -MUSIC SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
136 -MUSIC SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
136 -MUSIC SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
137 -MUSIC SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
137 -MUSIC SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
137 -MUSIC SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
137 -MUSIC SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
138 -MUSIC SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
138 -MUSIC SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
138 -MUSIC SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
138 -MUSIC SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
129 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
150 242 150 100
173 240 173 100
1
1
3
3
1
Print Report Card
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
129 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
129 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
129 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
129 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
130 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
130 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
130 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
130 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
130 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
131 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
131 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
131 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
131 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
131 -PHYSICAL EDUCATION SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
123 -PHYSICS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
2
3
7
16 234 15 94
1
2
3
7
16 226 15 94
1
2
3
7
16 225 15 94
1
Print Report Card
Other enrolled students
123 -PHYSICS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
123 -PHYSICS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
123 -PHYSICS SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
166 -PUNJABI SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
167 -PUNJABI SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
168 -PUNJABI SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
081 -RICA
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
081 -RICA
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
081 -RICA
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
092 -RICA VIDEO
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
092 -RICA VIDEO
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
092 -RICA VIDEO
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
081.1 -RICA.1
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
081.1 -RICA.1
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
081.1 -RICA.1
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
7
61 92
1
4
8
9
7
68 229
61 100
57 84
Print Report Card
All program completers, 2011-12
081.1 -RICA.1
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
081.1 -RICA.1
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
118 -SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
118 -SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
118 -SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
118 -SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
118 -SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
119 -SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
119 -SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
119 -SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
119 -SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
119 -SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
114 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
114 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
114 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
155 231 139 90
134 231 122 91
2
5
9
8
29 245
2
5
9
8
29 244
5
10 242
11 241
29 100
29 100
10 100
11 100
Print Report Card
All program completers, 2010-11
114 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
115 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
115 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
115 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
115 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
116 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
Other enrolled students
116 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
116 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
116 -SOCIAL SCIENCE SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
145 -SPANISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
145 -SPANISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
145 -SPANISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
145 -SPANISH SUBTEST I
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
146 -SPANISH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
146 -SPANISH SUBTEST II
16
5
10 240
11
16
5
10
11
16
1
2
3
5
1
2
236
243
239
237
242
238
16 100
10 100
11 100
16 100
10 100
11 100
16 100 https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
146 -SPANISH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
146 -SPANISH SUBTEST II
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
147 -SPANISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All enrolled students who have completed all nonclinical courses
147 -SPANISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2011-12
147 -SPANISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
147 -SPANISH SUBTEST III
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
142 -WRITING SKILLS
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2010-11
142 -WRITING SKILLS
Evaluation Systems group of Pearson
All program completers, 2009-10
Group
All program completers, 2011-12
Number taking tests
Number passing tests
Pass rate
(%)
128 115 90
All program completers, 2010-11
All program completers, 2009-10
250
347
234 94
332 96
3
5
1
2
3
5
6
2
Provide the following information about the approval or accreditation of your teacher preparation program.
Is your teacher preparation program currently approved or accredited?
Yes
If yes, please specify the organization(s) that approved or accredited your program:
State https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Other (specify: WASC, CTC)
Is your teacher preparation program currently under a designation as "low-performing" by the state (as per section 207(a) of the HEA of 2008)?
No
Provide the following information about the use of technology in your teacher preparation program. Please note that choosing 'yes' indicates that your teacher preparation program would be able to provide evidence upon request.
Does your program prepare teachers to: integrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction
Yes use technology effectively to collect data to improve teaching and learning
Yes use technology effectively to manage data to improve teaching and learning
Yes use technology effectively to analyze data to improve teaching and learning
Yes
Provide a description of the evidence that your program uses to show that it prepares teachers to integrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction, and to use technology effectively to collect, manage, and analyze data in order to improve teaching and learning for the purpose of increasing student academic achievement. Include a description of the evidence your program uses to show that it prepares teachers to use the principles of universal design for learning, as applicable. Include planning activities and a timeline if any of the four elements listed above are not currently in place.
Programs for prospective teachers include preparation to use technology effectively for a variety of purposes per state standards. We offer a technology course that is a program prerequisite in order to ensure that candidates have a foundational ability to use technology for teaching and learning. In addition, each program has an identified learning outcome addressing technology and its use in improving teaching and learning. All university courses are taught with the support of an e-companion. All candidates are expected to access and use technology in their completion of all coursework, field experiences and clinical practice.
Candidates have seen the ways that faculty integrate technology and use it to improve teaching and learning.
They are encouraged to use these ideas in their clinical practice based upon the technology available to them in their schools/districts. One of the Teaching Performance Tasks (Task 3) focuses on the use of assessments in order to improve teaching and learning. Candidates are encouraged to use technology to complete this task. Their ability to do so is based upon the technology available at the school/district. Candidates are placed in schools districts that have a variety of technology. Faculty are currently preparing candidates for the use of SmartBoard technology in their student teaching placement. This can be done on-ground at many of the centers and cameras make it possible to capture instruction as video for use in on-line courses.
Interns are encouraged to design technology-mediated and technology-enhanced instruction across subject matter areas for P12 students. All courses have embedded technology for use in the form of PP presentations, narrated PP presentations, Prezi presentations, Class Live Pro Interactive Suites, use of Video
Streaming, Dropbox, Zoom, IMovie, VoiceThread, SKYPE exchanges, use of Smartboards in both university classrooms and P12 classrooms.
https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Provide the following information about your teacher preparation program. Please note that choosing 'yes' indicates that your teacher preparation program would be able to provide evidence upon request.
Does your program prepare general education teachers to: teach students with disabilities effectively
Yes participate as a member of individualized education program teams
Yes teach students who are limited English proficient effectively
Yes
Provide a description of the evidence your program uses to show that it prepares general education teachers to teach students with disabilities effectively, including training related to participation as a member of individualized education program teams, as defined in section
614(d)(1)(B) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and to effectively teach students who are limited English proficient. Include planning activities and a timeline if any of the three elements listed above are not currently in place.
All prospective single and multiple subject teachers must complete the California Teaching Assessment (Cal
TPA). Cal TPA is made up of four tasks. They are TASK SSP: Subject Specific Pedagogy (4 case studies)
1. Developmentally Appropriate Pedagogy
2. Assessment Practices
3. Adapting Content-Specific Pedagogy for English Learners
4. Adapting Content-Specific Pedagogy for Students w/ Special Needs
Task SI: Designing Instruction
Task AL: Assessing Student Learning
Task CTE: Culminating Teaching Experience
Within each tasks, prospective teachers must demonstrate ability to adapt content, instruction and assessment for both a special needs student and an English learner. Instruction in courses guides prospective teachers to success in completing these tasks. There are specific courses on teaching English learners and meeting the needs of special needs students. In addition, for the four foundational courses, there are co-course leads-a faculty member from general education and one from special education. This cocourse lead model ensures that candidates have an understanding of the role of both special education and general education teachers and how they are to work together at school sites including as member of individualized education program teams.
Furthermore, candidates are expected to observe and learn how Individualized Education Program teams work and participate in them as appropriate during their student teaching and/or internship.. During coursework, general education candidates need to learn about multiple disabilities and how to implement
RTI in response to needs of special needs students, co-teaching for inclusion. Their Clinical Practice placements require that candidates be placed in public educational settings that are considered diverse as per the multiple learner profiles of the P12 students they serve.
https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Does your program prepare special education teachers to: teach students with disabilities effectively
Yes participate as a member of individualized education program teams
Yes teach students who are limited English proficient effectively
Yes
Provide a description of the evidence your program uses to show that it prepares special education teachers to teach students with disabilities effectively, including training related to participation as a member of individualized education program teams, as defined in section
614(d)(1)(B) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and to effectively teach students who are limited English proficient. Include planning activities and a timeline if any of the three elements listed above are not currently in place.
Candidates in our program learn to teach students with disabilities effectively through three means: course work, field experiences and student teaching or internships. They learn the knowledge and skills in their course work, observe and practice during field experiences, and implement independently during student teaching or internships. Courses providing information about IDES 2004, the IEP process, Response to
Intervention, characteristics of the thirteen qualifying disabilities, the special education teacher's role in the referral process, and planning for differentiated instruction include the following: SPD608 Exceptionalities,
SPD614 Classroom and Management Behavior, SPD616 Law, Collaboration, and Transitions, SPD622
Assessment of Students with Disabilities, and SPD628 Teaching Reading/Language Arts in Special
Education. Specialization courses in Mild/Moderate, Moderate/Severe, and Deaf and Hard of Hearing include in depth knowledge and application of typical and atypical development, research and standardsbased curriculum and instruction, positive behavior support, and transition planning. Themes included in every course are: teaching English learners and students on the autism spectrum; collaborating with students, parents, other professionals and the community; and using technology as a tool to improve the learning of students with disabilities.
Please use this space to provide any additional information that describes your teacher preparation program(s). You may also attach information to this report card. The U.S.
Department of Education is especially interested in any evaluation plans or interim or final reports that may be available.
Recreation-1,Integrated Studies-1,Kinesiology-6,ASL-1,Environment Economics, Policy and Mgt.-2,Child and Family Studies-2,Music-4,Industrial Arts-2,Social Services-1,Urban Studies and Planning-1,Real Estate-
1,Criminal Justice-2,Child Development-2,Speech-Language Pathology Audiology-1,General Africana
Studies-1,Art-3,Deaf Studies-1,American Studies-1,Graphic Communication-1,Chicano Studies-1,Legal
Studies-1,Advertising-1,Behavioral Science-1.
National University
Alternative, IHE-based Program
2011-12
-
-
https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]
Print Report Card
Title II, Higher Education Act
OMB Control No.: 1840-0744 (exp. 12/31/2015) https://title2.ed.gov/Title2IPRC/Pages/PrintReport.aspx[5/1/2013 9:56:36 AM]