Critical Paper Guidelines Topic: Select one of the provided topics. Your goal is to construct a thorough analysis of the text you choose. You will closely examine the aspect of the novel you choose. Remember, this is not a five-paragraph essay – it should be many paragraphs. Paper length: 6-7 pages + works cited page, double spaced, size 12 font, normal margins. Components – _______________ DUE April 15: Brainstorming and initial working thesis (10 points) _______________ DUE April 20: Detailed preliminary outline of the proposed argument based on primary text research only (10 points) _______________ DUE April 22: primary notes (25 points) _______________ DUE April 29: 20 secondary notes and 4 secondary source notes (25 points) _______________ DUE May 6: intro and body #1 due (10 points) _______________ DUE May 11: full first draft with finalized outline (20 Points) _______________ DUE May 13: final copy with turnitin.com receipt (220 points) All submissions must be hard copy. Be sure to keep an electronic copy for yourself. Absent? Have someone drop it off to me by 2:15 pm in K237. No exceptions. Plan ahead! Critical Paper Writing Tips How to Write a Thesis Statement Any work of literary analysis must contain a thesis – an attitude or position taken by a writer with the purpose of proving or supporting it. Your goal as you write your critical paper is to prove that your thesis, which you state in your introductory paragraph, is true. First, however, you have to generate the thesis itself. The topic list you have been given is not written in sentence form. Your first step, therefore, is to develop that topic into a statement of opinion that does not include phrases such as “I think that” or “I believe.” In expository writing you should simply state your opinion as if it is fact and then provide sufficient supporting detail and analysis to support your thesis. Once you have generated a sentence that expresses an opinion about your topic, you will go on to find support for this thesis from both the text as well as from critical articles written by professionals. In writing your paper, you will blend the critics’ ideas with your own, being careful to document, or cite, which ideas you have taken from the critical articles. Your thesis will grow and take shape as your research progresses since it should, in addition to making a statement of opinion, reflect the overall structure of your paper. Therefore, the first thesis you submit will be less complex than the final thesis of your paper, which will include references to the major topic areas (usually three or four) within your paper. In order for the writer to focus precisely upon the topic for research or critical analysis, two things are essential: a. b. Example 1: materialism. The writer must have thorough knowledge of the primary source upon which the paper will be based. The writer must develop a sharply focused purpose or thesis statement. As you develop your thesis statement ask yourself: “What is the purpose of this paper?” After you have determined an answer, say to yourself: “The purpose of this paper is to prove…” NEVER actually write the above. For example, The purpose of this paper is to prove: The American Dream, like Gatsby’s dream, is doomed to failure when it is corrupted by Example 2: In the entire gritty and corrupt scope of the novel, Nick Carraway emerges as the novel’s protagonist: his censoring of events and his connection to Daisy and Gatsby cause him to undergo a significant character change. Example 3: Possessing the qualities of the American dreamer, Gatsby creates a colossal dream and weaves it around his love for Daisy. Though he remains faithful until the end, her materialistic nature eventually destroys both the dream and the dreamer. Introductions made easy Define the context and time period about which you are writing, and establish how literature has presented this time period. Examine the central theme around which your paper will be developed and introduce the characters and elements of the plot that the author uses to develop this thematic focus. First sentence Begin with an opening sentence that generally describes the topic you have chosen, but do not mention the novel or anything about the book. This way you make the statement a universal problem that all people can relate to. Here are a few possibilities: o o o Universal statement A quotation by an authority about Fitzgerald or Hemingway Facts/statistics about 1920s America or 1920s American Ex-pats Second sentence Connect some part of the book to the general idea in the opening, and add the author’s name and title of the novel. Next few sentences o Add exposition (relevant background info about novel, author, time period – Not a plot summary!) o Build to your thesis. Your thesis does not have to be a single sentence, but it should be streamlined. Do NOT include specific supporting details in your thesis. End Introduction with Thesis! Body Paragraphs made easy Construct topic sentences carefully. They must align with the capital letters and/or numbers from your outline. Remember the basics of expository structure: topic sentence, insightful analysis using embedded textual and critical references, and a clincher which comments on the effect of this aspect Do not summarize the plot and do not use phrases such as “throughout the novel” – rather, reference the action of the novel Ex: (When Nick first arrives in West Egg, he “began to like the racy adventurous feel of it.”) Do not write – (Early in the novel, Nick “began to like the racy adventurous feel of it.” Conclusions made easy Conclusions are often the most difficult part of an essay to write, and many writers feel that they have nothing left to say after having written the paper. A writer needs to keep in mind that the conclusion is often what a reader remembers best. Your conclusion should be the best part of your paper. A conclusion should stress the importance of the thesis statement, give the essay a sense of completeness, and leave a final impression on the reader. Suggestions Answer the question "So What?" o Show your readers why this paper was important. Show them that your paper was meaningful and useful. o Synthesize, don't summarize. o Don't simply repeat things that were in your paper. They have read it. Show them how the points you made and the support and examples you used were not random, but fit together. o Redirect your readers. o Give your reader something to think about, perhaps a way to use your paper in the "real" world. If your introduction went from general to specific, make your conclusion go from specific to general. Think globally. Create a new meaning. o You don't have to give new information to create a new meaning. By demonstrating how your ideas work together, you can create a new picture. Often the sum of the paper is worth more than its parts. Avoid: Ending with a rephrased thesis statement that contains no substantive changes. Introducing a new idea or subtopic (although you may end with a provocative question; see below). Focusing on a minor point in the essay. Concluding with a sentence tacked on to your final point. Apologizing for your view by saying such things as "I may not be an expert" or "At least this is my opinion." Attempting to make up for an incomplete structure. (If you say you will discuss four books, attempt a complete discussion of two books, do not try to cover the remaining texts in a concluding paragraph. In such a situation, it's best to limit your paper to topics you can realistically cover.) Critical Paper Grading Sheet Name______________________________ Part One: Mechanics (50 points possible) Format (10 points possible) __________ Correct format for the front page, margins, spacing, and page numbering Grammar/Usage/Style (30 points possible) ___________ _____spelling _____clear pronoun reference _____strong pronouns _____no slang/clichés _____no contractions _____concision _____varied sentences _____smooth syntax _____formal tone ____proper agreement _____parallel structure _____ active voice _____consistent tense _____punctuation Works Cited Page (10 points possible) -MLA format ____________ SUBTOTAL ____________/50 Part Two: Content (170 points possible) Parenthetical Documentation (70 points possible) ___________ -Approximately 15-20 primary source quotations -Approximately 3-5 quotations from each secondary source (Minimum of 3 secondary sources) -MLA format followed for every comma, period and space -Correct citations from primary and secondary sources Quality of Argument (50 points) ___________ -Focus on argument maintained throughout paper -Correct use of qualifications, support and/or counterarguments Analysis/Embedding of quotations (50 points) ___________ -Text analyzed, not summarized/ analysis focuses on how/why -Sufficient context surrounding quote/smooth embedding -Sufficient critical support for argument’s validity -Strong diction/sophisticated, controlled syntax Subtotal (content) ____________________ + Subtotal (Mechanics) __________________ Peer Editing-Introduction and Body Paragraphs Peer Reader #1 ___________________________________ Introductory paragraph _____Does the writer define/explain the concept of his or her topic? _____Does the writer provide background information about the author or novel? _____Is the thesis concise (but not necessarily one sentence)? _____Is there any misused diction? If so, label “wc” on paper. _____Are there any other awkward passages that need to be revised? If so, label “awk” on paper. Constructive comments: Peer Reader #2 __________________________________ Body Paragraph #1 _____Does the topic sentence focus on the first major prong of the thesis? _____Does the second sentence sharpen the focus of the topic sentence? _____Are textual and critical quotations blended smoothly? _____Is each quotation documented with parenthetical documentation? _____Does the clincher “dig deeper” by assessing the impact/effect/result of this evidence? _____Are there any errors in diction or syntax? If so, label them on the paper. Constructive comments: Peer Reader #3 ________________________________ Body Paragraph 2 _____Does the topic sentence connect the first example to the second, while maintaining focus on the second prong of the argument (thesis)? _____Does the first and/or second sentence sharpen the focus of the topic sentence? _____Are quotes blended smoothly? _____Are quotes correctly punctuated and cited? _____Does the clincher “dig deeper” by assessing the impact/effect/result of this piece of evidence? _____Are there any errors in diction or syntax? Identify and label on paper. Constructive comments: Peer Reader #4 ___________________________________ Body Paragraph 3 _____Does the topic sentence connect the first example to the second, while maintaining focus on the second prong of the argument (thesis)? _____Does the first and/or second sentence sharpen the focus of the topic sentence? _____Are quotes blended smoothly? _____Are quotes correctly punctuated and cited? _____Does the clincher “dig deeper” by assessing the impact/effect/result of this piece of evidence? _____Are there any errors in diction or syntax? Identify and label on paper. Constructive comments: Editing Checklist Name__________________________________ Directions: Edit your paper for the following potential errors. Additionally, find two trustworthy people to read the paper and fill out the checklist. Be sure they sign their names at the bottom of this paper. You #1 #2 _____ _____ _____ spelling _____ _____ _____ unclear pronoun reference _____ _____ _____ weak pronouns (this, it) _____ _____ _____ use of slang/cliché _____ _____ _____ use of contractions (other than in quotations) _____ _____ _____ wordiness _____ _____ _____ need for sentence combining _____ _____ _____ need for sentence variety _____ _____ _____ weak or inappropriate diction (word choice) _____ _____ _____ awkward syntax (sentence structure/arrangement) _____ _____ _____ tone (should be formal, but not overwritten) _____ _____ _____ agreement errors _____ _____ _____ misplaced modifiers _____ _____ _____ lack of parallel structure _____ _____ _____ passive voice _____ _____ _____ comma errors _____ _____ _____ apostrophe errors _____ _____ _____ colon/semicolon errors _____ _____ _____ misuse of dash Proofreader #1 _____________________________ Proofreader #2 __________________________