Japan- Korea Workshop on Productivity Analysis Some Stylized Facts on the Firm Size Distribution in Korea Jeong-Dong Lee and Junho Na Seoul National University 2012. 12. 7. Contents I. Background II. Some Stylized Facts on the Firm Size Distribution in Korea III. Change of Firm Size Distribution over time I. Background Implications of Firm Size Distribution (FSD) Heterogeneities of firm population Vs. Density Density Comparison of Firm Size Distributions Log (Sales, Employee, Assets….) Log (Sales, Employee, Assets….) (d) Vs. Log (Sales, Employee, Assets….) Density Density (c) Log (Sales, Employee, Assets….) 3/23 Log-Normal vs. Pareto Better fit of Pareto distribution to the right-skewed, fat-tailed population Linear Log-Normal Log Heavy & Long TailLog Straight Line in Log-Log Axes Concave to Origin Stable Mean Unstable Finite Variance Potentially Infinite Clearly defined Confidence Interval often hard-to-tell Vanishing Tail Tail Long & Fat Tail Average Value Important Variables Extreme Value Independence, Homogeneity Assumption Interdependence, Heterogeneity Relevant Concepts Mutually Causal, Emergent Nonlinear Dynamics, Coevolution, Diversity Linearity, Randomness, Equilibrium Log * Source : Andriani & McKelvey (2009) Pareto 4/23 Interpretation of Pareto Distribution Pareto CDF Interpretation Pareto Distribution can be drawn in the form of PDF or CDF Log Probability Density πππ βΆ π(π₯) = Pr(π = π₯) = πΆπ₯ −πΌ πͺπͺπͺ βΆ π(π₯) = Pr(π ≥ π₯) = πΆπ₯ −π OLS or MLE fitting α : exponent of power law = slope of power law line α of PDF = a of CDF + 1 Usu. 2 < α < 3 in nature, a little broader range in economics Decrease of α = Existence of bigger firms Log Size Xmin : smallest value of range where power law is valid = MES (Minimum Efficient Scale) 5/23 Stylized Facts on FSD from Previous Researches Statically asymmetric and dynamically robust Asymmetric & Right-skewed * Figure Source : Cabral & Mata (2003) Robust over time 6/23 II. Firm Size Distributions in Korea FSD of KOSPI firms Power law holds… but weakly KOSPI firms (2009, non-financial, Size=Sales, N=651)* CDF (Log-log form) Median = 3.30 Mean = 3.38 S.D = 0.75 Skewness = 0.26 Kurtosis = 3.55 Log (Sales) * Data Source : KIS Value Log Pr (X ≥ x) (Cumulative Prabability Density) Probability Density DF (Log-real form) α = 1.84 Xmin = 10^11.9 Log (Sales) 8/23 FSD of the whole enterprise population Power law holds… and strongly Nationwide enterprise survey (2009, over 10 employees, Size=Employees, N=236,269)* Median = 18.00 Mean = 39.51 Skewness = 155.28 Kurtosis = 8294.33 Log (Employees) * Data Source : Korea Statistics Bureau. CDF (Log-log form) Log Pr (X ≥ x) (Cumulative Prabability Density) Probability Density DF (Log-real form) α = 2.46 Xmin = 64 Log (Employees) 9/23 FSD of manufacturing plants (1) Pareto distribution across diverse proxy measures on size Korea mining & manufacturing survey (2009, over 10 employees, N=47,059) Size = Production μμ°μ‘ 2009 0 Size = Employees 0 10 10 Value added 10 Pr(X ≥ x) -2 10 νλ₯ λ°λ Total fixed assets -1 -1 10 -3 10 -4 -2 N -3 Median -4 Mean 10 10 10 10 S.D. -5 -5 10 -2 10 0 10 2 10 κ· λͺ¨(λ¨ μ : μ΅ μ ) 4 10 10 6 10 1 10 Size = Total fixed assets 2 3 4 47,059 47,059 47,059 47,059 29.4 19.0 20.0 11.8 201.6 43.7 768.7 66.4 275.0 14,856.2 1,123.6 3,316.7 5 10 10 10 Employees (2009, λͺ ) 10 Size = Value added Skewness Kurtosis 58.4 56.8 45.6 64.2 4,224.6 4,242.8 2,450.0 5,086.6 1.95 2.50 1.67 2.01 0 0 10 -1 10 10 10 Pr(X ≥ x) -2 Pr(X≥x) 10 -3 10 -1 α -2 Xmin 69.59 80.00 110.82 44.65 Proportion of higher 20% groups 88.8% 66.0% 97.0% 87.2% 10 -3 10 -4 -4 10 10 -5 -5 10 Produc- Employtion ees -2 10 0 10 2 10 Total Asset (2009, 4 10 μ΅ μ) 6 10 3 10 10 VA (2009, 4 10 μ΅μ) * Measuring units of production, fixed assets, value added = 100 million won 5 10 6 10 10/23 FSD of manufacturing plants (2) Pareto distribution of resource, capability, and performance Korea mining & manufacturing survey (2009, over 10 employees, N=47,059) Resource Capability Performance Total Fixed Assets Labor Productivity Value Added 0 10 -1 10 -1 -1 10 10 Pr(X≥x) α = 1.67 Xmin= 110.82 -3 10 X Pr(X ≥ x) -2 -2 10 -3 10 α = 2,86 Xmin= 89.07 ⇒ -4 -4 10 0 10 2 10 Total Asset (2009, 4 10 μ΅ μ) Highly heterogeneous 6 10 10 -3 10 α = 2.01 Xmin= 44.65 10 -5 -2 10 -2 10 -4 10 -5 Pr(X ≥ x) 10 10 10 0 0 10 -5 1 10 λ Έλμμ°μ±(μ΅μ) 2 10 Relatively homogenous 3 10 10 3 10 VA (2009, 4 10 μ΅μ) 5 10 6 10 Relatively heterogeneous 11/23 FSD by Sectors (1) Different slopes for different sectors Korea mining & manufacturing survey (2009, over 10 employees, Size = Production) Food (ind.code=10) Textile (ind.code=13) μ λ£ νμ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =10) 0 10 1 2 3 10 10 μ μ° μ‘(2009, μ΅ μ ) 10 4 10 μ μ§ μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =17) 3 5 10 -2 10 -3 10 -1 10 1 μΈ μ μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =18) 0 3 10 -1 10 5 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009, μ΅μ) 10 Chemical (ind.code=20) 10 10 -2 10 -4 1 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009, μ΅μ) Print & Publishing (ind.code=18) Paper (ind.code=17) 0 -2 10 -3 -4 -1 10 10 10 10 -1 10 -4 -1 -1 Pr(X ≥ x) -2 10 -3 10 -2 10 μΌ λ° ν ν μ νμ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =20) 0 -3 0 10 1 2 3 10 -1 10 4 10 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009, μ΅μ) 10 Pharmaceutical (ind.code=21) 3 10 0 κ³ λ¬΄,ν λΌ μ€ ν± μ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =22) -1 -1 10 10 -1 -2 10 1 10 2 3 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 4 10 10 0 10 -2 -3 -3 10 -4 0 10 -2 10 10 -3 10 -3 Pr(X≥x) -2 10 Pr(X ≥ x) -2 10 10 Pr(X≥x) Pr(X ≥ x) 10 Pr(X ≥ x) 2 10 -1 10 1 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) (ind.code=22) μ μ½ μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =21) 0 0 10 Rubber, Plalstic 10 10 -1 10 λͺ© μ¬ μ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =16) 0 10 10 10 -3 10 κ° μ£½,μ λ° μ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =15) 0 10 10 Pr(X ≥ x) Pr(X ≥ x) -2 Wood (ind.code=18) -1 10 10 μ λ₯ μ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =14) 0 10 -1 -1 10 Pr(X>=x) μ¬ μ μ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =13) 0 10 10 Leather & Shoes (ind.code=15) Pr(X ≥ x) 0 Clothes (ind.code=14) 10 -3 -4 1 10 2 3 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 4 10 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 3 10 10 μ μ° μ‘(2009, μ΅ μ ) 4 10 5 10 10 -1 10 -4 0 10 1 2 3 10 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 4 10 10 -2 10 0 10 2 10 μ μ° μ‘(2009,μ΅ μ ) 4 10 6 10 12/23 FSD by Sectors (1) Korea mining & manufacturing survey (2009, over 10 employees, Size = Production) λΉμ² μ μ‘°μ (μ°μ μ½λ=23) 0 0 10 10 -1 -2 10 -3 -3 10 -4 10 -1 10 3 10 -1 10 5 10 μ κΈ° μ₯ λΉ(μ° μ μ½ λ =28) 0 μ λ μ°¨, νΈ λ μΌ λ¬ (μ° μ μ½ λ =30) 0 10 -4 -4 0 2 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 4 10 10 -2 10 0 2 10 10 μ μ° μ‘(2009,μ΅ μ ) 4 10 -1 10 6 10 10 Ship, Airplane (ind.code=31) κΈ° κ³,μ₯ λΉ (μ° μ μ½ λ =29) 0 1 3 5 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 10 Furnitures (ind.code=32) κΈ° ν μ΄ μ‘ μ₯ λΉ (μ‘° μ λ± , μ° μ μ½ λ =31) κ° κ΅¬ μ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =32) 0 10 10 -1 10 -2 10 -3 -3 10 -1 -1 10 -2 10 Machinery (ind.code=29) 10 10 10 10 -4 10 Automobiles (ind.code=30) Electric Instruments (ind.code=28) 0 -2 10 -2 10 5 3 1 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) -1 -1 10 μ λ£,μ λ° κΈ° κΈ° (μ° μ μ½ λ =27) 0 10 10 10 -4 1 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) (ind.code=27) μ μ μ° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =26) 0 -3 10 Medical, Precision 10 10 Pr(X ≥ x) Pr(X ≥ x) -2 κΈ μ μ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =25) -1 10 10 Electronics (ind.code=26) 10 -1 10 Pr(X ≥ x) μ°¨ κΈ μ μ μ‘° μ (μ° μ μ½ λ =24) 1 0 Metal Assembly (ind.code=25) Pr(X ≥ x) Metals (ind.code=24) Pr(X≥x) Non-ferro metal (ind.code=23) -1 10 10 -1 -3 0 10 2 10 μ μ° μ‘(2009, μ΅ μ ) 4 10 6 10 10 -2 10 2 4 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 6 10 10 -2 10 Pr(X ≥ x) -2 10 10 -4 0 10 -2 10 -3 10 -4 -4 -2 10 -3 10 -3 10 10 -2 10 -2 10 Pr(X ≥ x) -2 10 Pr(X ≥ x) Pr(X ≥ x) Pr(X≥x) 10 -3 -4 0 2 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 4 10 10 -2 10 0 10 2 4 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009, μ΅μ) 6 10 10 -1 10 0 10 1 2 3 10 10 10 μμ°μ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 4 10 13/23 FSD by Sectors (2) Alternative measures alpha, Xmin (MES), Gini ind.code Sector 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Foods Textiles Clothes Leather & Shoes Woods Pulps & Papers Printing & Publishing Chemicals Pharmaceuticals Rubber & Plastic Non-ferro Metals Metals Metal Assembly Electronics Medical, Precision Instruments Electric Instruments Machineries Automobiles Shipbuilding & Airplanes Furniture Total No. of observation 2,803 2,434 2,132 469 480 999 1,030 1,807 217 4,265 1,428 1,912 7,296 3,115 1,167 2,932 7,254 2,587 1,147 950 46,424 α 1.86 2.67 1.96 1.89 3.20 1.92 2.71 1.69 3.00 2.18 2.24 1.98 2.26 1.77 2.32 1.91 2.20 2.01 1.57 1.98 Gini Xmin (MES) Coefficient 75.8 0.78 111.1 0.64 71.2 0.84 19.4 0.72 88.9 0.58 28.5 0.73 42.3 0.53 54.5 0.87 634.0 0.67 58.1 0.67 84.8 0.75 360.5 0.87 74.8 0.70 178.8 0.94 97.2 0.71 46.1 0.80 99.3 0.72 200.9 0.89 178.7 0.95 14.5 0.72 HHI 0.003 0.008 0.016 0.017 0.010 0.012 0.005 0.014 0.019 0.004 0.055 0.042 0.014 0.047 0.028 0.017 0.006 0.069 0.122 0.014 14/23 FSD by Sectors (3) Strong correlation between alpha and other measures Correlations between Gini efficient and Pareto coefficient (α) 3.50 3.00 α 2.50 Corr. = - 0.80 2.00 1.50 1.00 - 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 Gini Coefficient 15/23 FSD by Sectors (4) Weak correlation between alpha and MES Correlations between MES and Pareto efficient (α) * 3.50 3.00 α 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 - 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 MES (100 million won) * MES are measured by Xmin in Pareto CDF 16/23 FSD by Firm Characteristics (1) R&D vs. No-R&D Effort for innovation makes the population more heterogeneous Firm Activity Survey (2009, all industries, over 50 employees, N=10,319) no-R&D 0 κ·Έλ£Ή 10 No-R&D Groups -1 NoR&D Groups Pr(X ≥ x) 10 R&D Groups -2 10 -3 10 -4 10 -2 10 0 10 6 4 2 R&D 4,681 5,638 Median 183.4 313.6 Mean 756.9 2,172.2 4,214.7 17,384.2 10 10 10 맀μΆμ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 0 N S.D κ·Έλ£Ή 10 Skewness 31.1 30.8 -1 R&D Groups Pr(X ≥ x) 10 Kurtosis 1,396.2 1,351.3 -2 10 -3 α 10 -4 10 0 10 2 4 10 10 맀μΆμ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 6 10 Xmin 2.14 1,059.3 1.89 1,101.4 17/23 FSD by Firm Characteristics (2) Export vs. Domestic Export market makes the population more heterogeneous Firm Activity Survey (2009, all industries, over 50 employees, N=10,319) λ΄μκΈ°μ κ·Έλ£Ή 0 Domestic-only Groups 10 Export Groups -1 Domestic -only Groups Pr(X ≥ x) 10 -2 N 5,411 4,191 -3 Median 179.3 395.7 Mean 719.2 2,715.9 3,765.7 20,113.1 22.6 26.8 714.5 1,013.5 2.07 1.88 636.4 1,094.3 10 10 -4 10 -2 10 0 10 2 4 10 10 맀μΆμ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 6 10 S.D μμΆ κΈ°μ κ·Έλ£Ή 0 10 Skewness -1 Export Groups Pr(X ≥ x) 10 Kurtosis -2 10 α -3 10 -4 10 0 10 2 4 10 10 맀μΆμ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 6 Xmin 10 18/23 FSD by Firm Characteristics (3) Affiliated or Independent Affiliation makes the population more heterogeneous Firm Activity Survey (2009, all industries, over 50 employees, N=10,319) λ 립 κΈ°μ κ·Έλ£Ή 0 10 Independent Groups -1 Independent Groups Pr(X ≥ x) 10 Affiliated Groups -2 10 N 5,145 5,174 Median 144.8 491.5 Mean 305.3 2,748.2 S.D 974.1 18,505.7 -3 10 -4 10 -2 10 0 10 2 10 맀μΆμ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 4 10 κ³μ΄μ¬ κ·Έλ£Ή 0 10 Skewness -1 Affiliated Groups Pr(X ≥ x) 10 Kurtosis 28.5 1,224.0 28.1 1,146.6 -2 10 -3 10 α -4 10 -2 10 0 10 2 4 10 10 맀μΆμ‘(2009,μ΅μ) 6 10 Xmin(=MES) 2.48 392.5 1.95 2,501.4 19/23 III. FSD over time FSD by cohorts over time Cohort effect for older firms Korea mining & manufacturing survey (1993~2003, over 5 employees, Size = Employees) 21/23 Becomes more homogeneous over time in terms of number of employees FSD over time Changes of α values over time (1995~2009) 2.7 Employee Production Value Added Fixed α α α Asset α 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 Employee Production Value added Fixed asset 1.5 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2.28 2.29 2.30 2.41 2.42 2.47 2.45 2.53 2.53 2.46 2.48 2.53 2.57 2.56 2.52 2.12 2.06 2.11 2.16 1.96 1.97 1.97 1.99 1.99 1.97 1.98 1.98 1.99 1.96 1.95 1.97 1.98 2.07 1.98 1.98 2.01 2.00 2.02 2.05 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.01 2.01 1.99 1.95 1.95 1.93 1.92 1.93 1.92 1.97 1.99 1.99 2.00 2.02 2.05 2.00 2.00 22/23 Thank you ! 23/23