CSM ACCREDITATION FOLLOW-UP SURVEY--Faculty and Administration Fall 2006 1. There are many ways to bring diversity into the classroom. In which of the following ways do you incorporate diversity into your course or program curricula? [Check ALL that apply] If you selected “Other”, please specify: The question is insulting I can't answer this until I know what you mean by "diversity". Racial/ethnic diversity or diversity of teaching methods? The students themselves bring diversity to the classroom. It is not always appropriate I don't -- Math courses Team project interaction. In a hard science, it is a bit more difficult to take time to explore diverse experiences as part of the course material. The student's themselves make up a diverse population, and when team projects are underway each student must learn a bit about his/her team mates learning styles, schedules, and cultural aura. 2. In designing your course or program curricula, to what extend do you consider research information in the following areas: Demographic factors regarding the CSM student population. If you selected "Other", please specify: levels of how students are prepared I don't know what "consider research information" means, so I cannot answer. Do you want to know whether I read official college publications showing research? The Preparation course in the program was designed to meet the needs of nontraditional students entering after an extended absence from college or high school and for students who lacked the opportunities in high school to complete a high school course in the field. Aspects of my specific discipline which have resonance in the above communities. Transfer requirements of colleges/universities use of internet by students, faculty and staff curriculum is designed to facilitate transfer; transfer rates are considered in program planning I look at my course members specifically with significant consideration N/A for me 4. In the previous Fall 2005 accreditation survey for faculty and administrators, many indicated that they do not have enough input in College decision-making. What policies or practices would you make to improve our decision-making and shared governance processes? [Please give specific examples] CSM Internal could be used to provide more substantial information--really about governance issues instead of the trivial details it includes. The Academic Senate should be contacted first regarding any issues that affect instruction. All to often the administration makes a decision regarding these issues and expects the Senate to rubber stamp it. The Senate should push things up the ladder not the other way around. In the 1980s, many companies used the TQM (total quality management) and quality circles systems to improve their products and services. They formed "circles" or employee groups consisting of management, professionals, and lineworkers to tackle some of their difficult problems. Perhaps, we could form committees consisting of admin, faculty, classified workers and students to tackle specific problem areas and make recommendations for change. I feel that I do have input into College decision making. I'm a bit of an insider, but I think the system works quite well. I know a large % n/a There needs to be follow-up to make sure that department reps report to their respective departments. For example, our department had a rep on Faculty Senate and we never got a report or a highlight of important topics. Maybe the Deans need to follow-up with that. The reps could send a short email highlighting important items discussed and any issues raised. Then refer to the minutes that are published. I really don't know. My problem is less with input and more with not having adequate information on how the College and District are doing with respect to enrollment trends, finances, and Board of Trustees issues. It is difficult to provide input when one doesn't have much information about the environment we are working in. It's getting pretty bad when you have to turn to the "San Matean" (student paper) to discover what's happening at the College and around the District. Too many times I have seen administrators solicit faculty input only to then ignore it. It also happens that administrators solicit faculty input in the construction of college or district planning only to ignore the results. This leads faculty to wonder why they should make the effort. It has also happened that senior administrators decided on a policy with no faculty feedback whatever, but tried to create the appearance of feedback by creating a faculty committee to determine how the policy would be implemented. I think I do have input. I just have to be involved. I don't agree that we do not have enough opportunity for input Administrators should not make decisions based on ignorance. The swamp cooler in building 36 hinders performing science labs. I do not believe the administration took into account the required activities in the building and the effects of humidity on those activities, when it decided to install the swamp cooler. Administrators also did not ask faculty about how they interact with students during office hours (an important function of the faculty office), before choosing furniture that hinders interaction. Incorporate faculty in discussions at the earliest level of decision-making. For example, the decision to add 5 minutes per class of MWF 3-unit classes was a reasonable decision, but without faculty input at a much earlier stage of the discussion it felt imposed onto faculty. The input from faculty came much too late in the process. As much as possible, include faculty in the brainstorming part of a problem, not when a solution has already been formulated. Before deciding what budget aspects will receive "ear-marked" funds, someone should ask the faculty (and the students) what choices they would make. For example: nobody who works in the day appears to be aware that, with no screens and no air-conditioning, the rooms in the building where I spend a lot of time, building 16, is swarming with bugs attracted by the light at night, and the rooms stay hotter inside than the evening air outside. Everyone trying to work in those rooms is distracted by the bugs and the heat. Make the head of Admissions and Records much more responsive to concerns about forms and communication coming from his office. He needs to understand faculty needs and be helpful in trying to meet6 them. I believe that the folks who say this - aren't participating on committees. Committee work is one of the ways you can be heard. Before diversity there is tolerance and respect. Tolerance and respect are in short supply at CSM. Mgmt. discrimination against faculty is rampant, i.e., against women, against Jews, against older folks, against excellence. Cabinet and Bldg. 1 Deans might each have a small faculty committee to review major policy decisions before they are implemented Information flows up (sometimes so it seems) but often doesn't come down as readily I probably do not have enough input into college decision-making, but it would be impossible for a teacher really focusing on teaching to have said input. I have representatives on the Governing Council, College Council, and AFT--if I care about having input, I can have it through the channels already in place. We cannot and should not all be "inputting"--this is a representative governance, just as a democracy is. (I don't have "enough input" into national decision-making or we teachers would be paid more than corporate CEOs and we wouldn't be in Iraq!) Don't know, I feel I do have say in decisions. Maybe it's because I force myself to be actively involved, involved in more than one committee. Maybe we need to revisit our governance structure and see if all of the committees are really that important. There are a number of new things faculty are involved in, for example, learning communities. The faculty feel they are being proactive versus the usual committee which is reactive. There is too much reactive work going on. All employees enjoy their work and are willing to serve if they are doing something or contributing to something that is proactive. Have faculty involved in decision-making with respect to the Study Abroad program. Current program administration seeks "cover" by consulting faculty at one stage but gives short shrift to faculty in all other aspects of the program. I'm new and I do not know. Sorry. This question is especially important for classified staff as they seemed to be the most negative about input. 5. What improvements can be made to ensure that CSM fosters a climate of mutual trust and respect among faculty and administrators? [Please give specific examples] Meetings with structured agendas that are respectful of time but also allow for differences in opinion. Real differences (ones not related to race or the ethnicity) are not encouraged. Diversity at CSM seems to be defined by SOLELY in terms of race. That's not where the "difference" lie. Diversity lies is different points of view regardless of race, gender, cultural background, etc. Communication is an important part of ensuring a climate of trust and respect. This can occur in meetings, in one-on-one settings, and with updates or reports at the college level and the division level. Being informed of issues and situations and being asked for input before decisions are reached. Keep Shirley K.! Short of that, hire someone who has her kind of sensitivity to the needs and legitimate interests of the faculty. The VPI needs to work more closely with the faculty and not go off on his own. Don't inundate us with ed school language and "the latest thing." Don't force electronic everything on everyone. n/a I feel respected however, it's difficult when you send an email to a Dean or VP and get no response. After several reminders and there is still no response, what can happen? It seems that everyone is just too busy. I don't have any solutions. I'm quite sure that the proposed Mutual Respect Policy was not the way to ensure trust and respect. Administrators need to be honest with faculty, and to explain their decision-making processes. Decertify the faculty union and return to "meet and confer." Faculty and administrators are professionals and should treat each other accordingly without relying on an archaic, adversarial, ineffective and inefficient "win-lose" system of collective bargaining. Institute an Office of Ombudsman within District HR to handle all individual personnel issues. See 4 above. It also helps if deans are reasonably flexible, open to ideas, reasonably supportive of faculty, and honest in their dealings with faculty. In the past this has not always been the case. more free lunches. seriously, perhaps administrators can somehow show value toward our initiatives as faculty to improve teaching. I personally feel that my dean is excellent and I appreciate that she has concern for me as an instructor Administrators should consult with faculty before making decisions, particularly when faculty expertise can shed light on the outcomes of each possible choice. The suggestions I listed above might help. As much openness as possible in terms of long-term trends/ideas. Sometimes it seems that the administration sees longterm problems/changes and begins to make small accommodations or changes because of those perceived long-term trends. Faculty get brought in when very little can be done to change the trend, and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Stop sending adjuncts announcements of delightful benefits for which they do not qualify: health care open enrollment, Museum of Tolerance trip, other such. Get rid of the smarmy Chancellor. We are better educated and drive vehicles that respect the environment. He is an embarrassment at public functions when he is required to speak, and he drives a military vehicle. We have no respect for him. It always seems to be the same folks on committees. I would respect and trust my colleagues if they would participate more. Implement tolerance instead of giving lip service to a concept. Make sure mgmt. does not take illegal workplace actions, forcing grievances. Retain the open hours the President has for faculty; have members of Cabinet and President appear a couple of times each semester at Governing Counsel, as generally happens now. improve communication between Open, honest, clear communication among psychologically and mentally capable adults assumes more than is realistic--we are not all good communicators, we are not all psychologically and mentally capable, nor are we all "adults" in our transactions. I guess we just muddle on as best we can. No answer, I believe we are already doing a good job. administrators can continue to maintain an open door policy so faculty can discuss issues and concerns as they arise, administrators can be visible on campus, administrators and faculty can attend workshops, diversity series seminars together Support transparency wherever legal and practicable. open communication Continue to have open and honest dialog. An open-door policy by administrators is really important. If you selected "other" please specify: The gym showers have hair balls that remain in the gutters for weeks at a time. Ugghh! This is a health hazard. Simply disgusting. Why doesn't anybody clean this? Who is in charge. I am speechless. The electric doors usually don't work in Bldg. 16 and 14. There needs to be some regular checking with these doors so we don't have to wait until a student gets stuck before the door is fixed or the battery is replaced. Building 4, in general, and my classroom, 4-152, as well as my office, are poorly maintained. In the classroom the floors and desks are filth, the curtains are falling off the rods, ceiling tiles are falling off the ceiling. The room is nearly unbearable in warm weather, and freezing in the cold. The lighting is inadequate. The outdoor hallway upstairs if filthy. The floor in my office remains unswept unless I do it. Graffiti accumulates in the halls unless I call for it to be cleaned up. I could go on. I don't really understand "maintenance" for classrooms, offices... I think more cleaning is needed, including cigarette remains from sidewalks and landscaped areas. Also, I am in a new building and the temperature/air flow has problems that aren't maintenance, but poor design and have not ever been working. The bathrooms in Bldg. 17 are disgustingly maintained and have no ventilation whatsoever. I believe that this is a code violation, and I have called CAL/OHSHA about it. It is demoralizing to have to use these bathrooms. conscience group of people 9. Please provide any other comments about facilities. There are no "public" standards for what determines upkeep of classrooms and offices. If there are, they are kept a secret. None of us know what is reasonable to expect of the B and G people. My colleagues and I have spoken often of the deplorable state of maintenance on campus. There are some restrooms on campus I will not use. My office is never cleaned, except for the removal of garbage, and that is not always done. Clearly, facilities at CSM needs improvement. Gym showers should be closed down because they are a health hazard. I have never used the online service request forms because it is obvious that nobody is listening. If you drop a towel on the floor of the locker room, is literally covered with dirt and a huge amount of human hair. We have a beautiful campus. It's a shame that we've let it deteriorate. More money should be spent on the landscaping to make this a desirable place to come to. The lawn is full of weeds. I am not critical of the maintenance staff because I know they do the best they can given the limited staff but this should be a showcase institution. If you want people to be proud to attend this school we need to make it a place people want to go to. It would be nice of the faculty offices were cleaned occasionally. I have found my facilities needs to be met in a timely, pleasant manner. The only thing I would change would be the timing of lawn mowing --- as it is really difficult to teach a class with a loud riding mower going by the window. CSM has an appearance of neglect, which doesn't make our campus particularly attractive to students. We look like just another run-down high school, which detracts from students' ability to understand that we are indeed part of higher education. Needs a real beautification program and the funds to maintain it properly. It sometimes seems that it's such a bother to put in a work order. Particularly since many items have to be done at night or with overttime. It is outrageous that our faculty offices are NEVER cleaned, and that despite teaching here for over 7 years, I have never been able to get a bulletin board or picture hung in my office. Something needs to be done about the continual graffiti in restrooms and in other areas. Why have over $600 million in bond funds available and not be able to maintain a respectable campus appearance? Something also needs to be done about the many drivers who totally ignore stop signs around the campus. I suggested to Chief Wells that we invest in cameras and have tickets written based on a camera system. I never heard back. We could slow down the speeders while increasing the parking lot reserve fund. I usually call when I have a maintenance issue. I know it's a tough issue and that custodians do work hard One thing that bugs me though is that custodians have emptied recycling into trash cans and that bothers me as I go out of my way to recycle I call in my maintenance requests. Usually they are handled promptly. I would prefer, however, if maintenance was regularly scheduled so that I wouldn't have to request it. I did not answer the above, because it is a mixed answer. I have put in 38 work requests since 1 Aug 06. About half are listed as completed. For most requests I would say yes. One problem with the help center is that apparently no one reads notes added to work orders. One work order was actually completed by Axiom (outside furniture contractor) on 9 Aug 06. I added a note stating this fact, but the work order is still listed as active. I can only assume no added notes are read. I make my requests by telephone, in person. Other people fill in the paperwork (thank God). Generally speaking, techs respond quickly and efficiently. Help us clean up the bathrooms in Bldg. 17 and get air flow going. Stop the flow of heat on 90 degree days on the top floor of Bldg. 16. Bldg. 9 AC always on the fritz. Sometimes it gets so hot it's hard to concentrate. This problem has been happening as long as we have been back in THE BLDG., SINCE RENOVATION. Heating and cooling in Bldg. 16 is uneven; antiquated heating system in Bldg 17 needs replacement. media service and facilities are terrific quick to respond and always with a smile these guys are great we would close down without them and I am not aware of even half of what they do!!!! There were mosquitoes breeding in the constantly water-filled trenches made by college vehicles driving on sidewalks and cutting the corners thus breaking sprinklers and mashing down the dirt so the water collected in these tracks. Facilities did send someone out to fill in the wet spots after a couple of weeks but vehicles continued to drive over these spots and make new tracks for water to sit in and breed mosquitoes. Students need to feel "proud" of their environment/college and they need to understand that littering is not acceptable nor is it "cool." I think strongly worded signs about not littering, security "arresting" litterers--once someone sees trash on the ground, the impulse to throw a wrapper down is increased. I applaud the new "green" eco-club that I think is forming--I hope they can help. Meanwhile, I have driven in states that have strongly worded signs against littering--beyond the "Keep California beautiful" level--that actually state that people are expected to take pride in keeping the environs beautiful. We have a gorgeous campus-students need to know they are expected to respect and preserve the environment. CSM Facilities has been very responsive to our needs. They handle issues that arise in our building in a timely, professional manner. Facilities (that can park anywhere with impunity, even in Red & Yellow zones) has carved out a "Facilities Vehicles Only" parking slot in at least one faculty lot. This slot is often empty, an irritating fact when no other slot is available in that lot for faculty vehicles. Facilities took months to replace my office key after I lost it. That is a preposterous length of time to have to wait. 2. I also think that the heating of some classrooms is not adjusted to the weather. My students and I have frozen in winter and baked in warm weather 16-268. Phoning has never brought any significant change in the situation. 3. The floor of my office is filthy. Lint hangs from the ceiling and on the walls in the copy room of building 17. It would be lovely if rooms could be vacuumed more often and stairwells could be cleaned When a facilities request is placed, you are not updated regarding the status of the request. Perhaps there is a very good reason for it not being completed. At other times, facilities personnel have been excellent in providing quick service. Sometimes items are listed as completed that haven't been satisfactorily addressed. excellent response time. always! Most cleaning of office space is minimal. Corners, window areas, blinds, etc., are not cleaned. 10. Other Comments: Facilities has done a great job with landscaping. I made lots of negative comments about the gym, but they did do a good job on the outside. On the diversity question at the start, I teach intercultural communication ITS is doing a phenomenal job with work requests. They are completed with unexpected quickness. Who signed off the budget in the Foreign Language Center (18-112) without assuring air-conditioning to protect the computers (never mind the people)? If you would like the results of this survey, please give us your email address: obrien@smccd.net kramm@smccd.net locke@smccd.edu Carterm@smccd.edu grantg@pacbell.net combs@smccd.edu scholer@smccd.edu mathur@smccd.edu piper@smccd.edu frontierac@smccd.edu mcateer@smccd.edu brownsh@smccd.edu