Elizabeth City State University
The Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Research, and Assessment
Sophomore Survey Analysis 1998-2008
The University of North Carolina-General Administration (UNC-GA) developed a system of student surveys to help evaluate
institutional performance. During the spring 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2008 semester, all sixteen UNC campuses conducted
a survey of sophomores. The purpose of the Sophomore Survey is to gather information concerning the undergraduate
experience at Elizabeth City State University. Questions concerning the students’ assessment of faculty contributions,
academic environment, satisfaction with services, knowledge & skill development and evaluation of campus atmosphere are
compiled in this report.
Section A. Faculty Contribution
Please evaluate how well faculty members at this campus do each of the following. Please mark only one response for each.
A1 - Faculty Set High Expectations For You To Learn
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
25
14.6
98
57.3
44
25.7
4
2.3
123
71.9
2000
20
16.1
73
58.9
29
23.4
2
1.6
93
75
2002
34
17.1
118
59.3
45
22.6
2
1
152
76.4
2004
54
28.7
97
51.6
35
18.6
2
1.1
151
80.3
2006
37
26.6
83
59.7
19
13.7
.
.
120
86.3
2008
59
59
41
41
.
.
.
.
100
100
1
A2 - Faculty Respect Diverse Learning Styles
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
18
10.5
86
50
55
32
13
7.6
104
60.5
2000
11
8.8
75
60
32
25.6
7
5.6
86
68.8
2002
29
14.4
110
54.5
55
27.2
8
4
139
68.8
2004
37
19.5
99
52.1
45
23.7
9
4.7
136
71.6
2006
26
18.7
77
55.4
33
23.7
3
2.2
103
74.1
2008
35
35
64
64
1
1
.
.
99
99
A3 - Faculty Encourage You To Be An Active Learner
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
40
23.3
93
54.1
35
20.3
4
2.3
133
77.3
2000
21
16.9
78
62.9
21
16.9
4
3.2
99
79.8
2002
41
20.3
103
51
49
24.3
9
4.5
144
71.3
2004
48
25.3
105
55.3
32
16.8
5
2.6
153
80.5
2006
37
26.6
79
56.8
22
15.8
1
0.7
116
83.5
2008
38
38
62
62
.
.
.
.
100
100
A4 - Faculty Encourage Student-Faculty Interaction
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
23
13.5
74
43.5
57
33.5
16
9.4
97
57.1
2000
19
15.2
59
47.2
36
28.8
11
8.8
78
62.4
2002
31
15.3
96
47.5
63
31.2
12
5.9
127
62.9
2004
37
19.5
92
48.4
53
27.9
8
4.2
129
67.9
2006
27
19.6
65
47.1
42
30.4
4
2.9
92
66.7
2008
36
36
63
63
1
1
.
.
99
99
2
A5 - Faculty Provide Frequent Feedback
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
22
12.9
72
42.1
65
38
12
7
94
55
2000
8
6.5
70
56.9
39
31.7
6
4.9
78
63.4
2002
24
11.9
97
48.3
69
34.3
11
5.5
121
60.2
2004
35
18.5
101
53.4
46
24.3
7
3.7
136
72
2006
28
20.4
72
52.6
36
26.3
1
0.7
100
73
2008
37
37
52
52
11
11
.
.
89
89
A6 - Faculty Encourage You to Devote Time and Energy to Coursework
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
44
25.9
24
19.2
35
17.3
50
26.3
38
27.5
52
52
Good
#
94
76
115
109
79
46
Fair
%
55.3
60.8
56.9
57.4
57.2
46
3
#
32
23
48
29
21
2
Poor
%
18.8
18.4
23.8
15.3
15.2
2
#
.
2
4
2
.
.
%
.
1.6
2
1.1
.
.
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
138
100
150
159
117
98
%
81.2
80
74.3
83.7
84.8
98
A7 - Faculty Develop Cooperative Learning Opportunities
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
21
12.3
11
8.8
23
11.4
36
18.9
27
19.6
45
45
Good
#
88
73
105
98
80
45
Fair
%
51.5
58.4
52
51.6
58
45
#
56
37
66
50
27
10
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
32.7
29.6
32.7
26.3
19.6
10
#
6
4
8
6
4
.
%
3.5
3.2
4
3.2
2.9
.
A8 - Faculty Care About Your Academic Success
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
28
16.3
15
12.6
29
14.7
35
19.1
33
24.6
43
43
Good
#
84
61
104
108
74
54
Fair
%
48.8
51.3
52.8
59
55.2
54
#
51
39
50
38
23
3
#
9
4
14
2
4
.
%
5.2
3.4
7.1
1.1
3
.
A9 - Evaluation of Instructors on These Previous Eight Measures
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
19
11.2
11
8.9
24
12.4
36
19.1
29
21.6
38
38
Good
#
95
80
111
110
73
48
Fair
%
55.9
65
57.5
58.5
54.5
48
4
#
53
30
52
41
31
8
#
3
2
6
1
1
6
#
112
76
133
143
107
97
%
65.1
63.9
67.5
78.1
79.9
97
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
31.2
24.4
26.9
21.8
23.1
8
%
63.7
67.2
63.4
70.5
77.5
90
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
29.7
32.8
25.4
20.8
17.2
3
#
109
84
128
134
107
90
%
1.8
1.6
3.1
0.5
0.7
6
#
114
91
135
146
102
86
%
67.1
74
69.9
77.7
76.1
86
Section B. Help Outside the Classroom
Based on you experience so far, how would you evaluate each of the following services? If you have not had enough
experience with a service to evaluate it, please mark the response "Don't know/did not use," and skip to the next service.
Please mark only one response for each lettered item.
B1a - Orientation for New Students: Length of Session
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
24
15.1
93
58.5
39
24.5
3
1.9
117
73.6
2000
9
7.6
71
60.2
37
31.4
1
0.8
80
67.8
2002
39
21
104
55.9
38
20.4
5
2.7
143
76.9
2004
47
26.1
106
58.9
27
15
.
.
153
85
2006
41
31.3
72
55
18
13.7
.
.
113
86.3
2008
30
34.9
53
61.6
3
3.5
.
.
83
96.5
B5b - Technology Services: Hours of Operation for Computer Center
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
55
33.7
41
35.3
78
42.2
87
48.3
47
36.4
26
29.9
Good
#
76
51
77
75
63
40
Fair
%
46.6
44
41.6
41.7
48.8
46
5
#
23
16
26
13
14
14
Poor
%
14.1
13.8
14.1
7.2
10.9
16.1
#
9
8
4
5
5
7
%
5.5
6.9
2.2
2.8
3.9
8
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
131
92
155
162
110
66
%
80.4
79.3
83.8
90
85.3
75.9
B1c - Orientation for New Students: Helpfulness of Staff
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
23
14.5
18
14.6
37
19.8
54
30.2
34
25.4
46
50.5
Good
#
98
83
96
97
73
40
Fair
%
61.6
67.5
51.3
54.2
54.5
44
#
31
18
47
26
26
.
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
19.5
14.6
25.1
14.5
19.4
.
#
7
4
7
2
1
5
%
4.4
3.3
3.7
1.1
0.7
5.5
B1d - Orientation for New Students: Accommodations
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
11
7.1
7
6
21
11.7
43
25.3
32
24.6
20
25.6
Good
#
86
70
97
92
67
43
Fair
%
55.8
59.8
53.9
54.1
51.5
55.1
6
#
47
36
53
33
30
15
#
10
4
9
2
1
.
%
76.1
82.1
71.1
84.4
79.9
94.5
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
30.5
30.8
29.4
19.4
23.1
19.2
#
121
101
133
151
107
86
%
6.5
3.4
5
1.2
0.8
.
#
97
77
118
135
99
63
%
63
65.8
65.6
79.4
76.2
80.8
B1e - Orientation for New Students: Overall
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
14
8.9
103
65.2
39
24.7
2
1.3
117
74.1
2000
11
9.1
88
72.7
20
16.5
2
1.7
99
81.8
2002
37
19.6
101
53.4
44
23.3
7
3.7
138
73
2004
45
25
108
60
27
15
.
.
153
85
2006
33
25.8
75
58.6
19
14.8
1
0.8
108
84.4
2008
29
33
46
52.3
13
14.8
.
.
75
85.2
B2a - Academic Advising: Access to Advisor
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
58
34.3
31
24.8
53
26.9
65
34.9
39
29.1
43
43
Good
#
63
58
70
80
56
45
Fair
%
37.3
46.4
35.5
43
41.8
45
#
38
25
51
26
32
10
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
22.5
20
25.9
14
23.9
10
#
10
11
23
15
7
2
%
5.9
8.8
11.7
8.1
5.2
2
B2b - Academic Advising: Sufficient Time With Advisor
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
45
26.6
29
23.4
44
22.2
50
27
33
25.2
32
33.3
Good
#
66
53
72
85
58
42
Fair
%
39.1
42.7
36.4
45.9
44.3
43.8
7
#
45
32
56
31
31
20
#
13
10
26
19
9
2
%
71.6
71.2
62.4
78
70.9
88
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
26.6
25.8
28.3
16.8
23.7
20.8
#
121
89
123
145
95
88
%
7.7
8.1
13.1
10.3
6.9
2.1
#
111
82
116
135
91
74
%
65.7
66.1
58.6
73
69.5
77.1
B2c - Academic Advising: Accurate Information About Degree Requirements
and Course Sequencing
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
54
32
32
25.8
38
19.5
57
30.3
34
25.4
37
38.5
Good
#
70
64
90
85
67
42
Fair
%
41.4
51.6
46.2
45.2
50
43.8
#
29
21
48
39
28
9
Poor
%
17.2
16.9
24.6
20.7
20.9
9.4
#
16
7
19
7
5
8
%
9.5
5.6
9.7
3.7
3.7
8.3
B2d - Academic Advising: Knowledge of Campus Policies and Procedures
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
33
19.8
15
12.3
32
16.5
40
21.9
42
31.6
36
38.3
Good
#
75
70
103
107
61
41
Fair
%
44.9
57.4
53.1
58.5
45.9
43.6
#
45
32
49
29
27
11
Poor
%
26.9
26.2
25.3
15.8
20.3
11.7
#
14
5
10
7
3
6
%
8.4
4.1
5.2
3.8
2.3
6.4
B2e - Academic Advising: Overall
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
33
20.4
20
16.3
37
18.9
47
25
31
23.5
37
38.5
Good
#
82
71
92
103
72
37
Fair
%
50.6
57.7
46.9
54.8
54.5
38.5
8
#
38
28
54
31
27
20
#
9
4
13
7
2
2
#
124
96
128
142
101
79
%
73.4
77.4
65.6
75.5
75.4
82.3
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
108
85
135
147
103
77
%
64.7
69.7
69.6
80.3
77.4
81.9
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
23.5
22.8
27.6
16.5
20.5
20.8
Excellent and
Good Combined
%
5.6
3.3
6.6
3.7
1.5
2.1
#
115
91
129
150
103
74
%
71
74
65.8
79.8
78
77.1
B3a - Academic Assistance or Tutoring: Writing
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
18
28.6
6
9.8
28
25
24
25
26
29.9
15
62.5
Good
#
30
40
60
58
45
5
Fair
%
47.6
65.6
53.6
60.4
51.7
20.8
#
12
12
21
11
15
4
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
19
19.7
18.8
11.5
17.2
16.7
#
3
3
3
3
1
.
%
4.8
4.9
2.7
3.1
1.1
.
B3b - Academic Assistance or Tutoring: Reading
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
19
28.8
8
14.3
23
21.1
15
16
21
25
9
45
Good
#
35
31
64
65
49
7
Fair
%
53
55.4
58.7
69.1
58.3
35
#
10
13
20
11
14
4
#
2
4
2
3
.
.
%
3
7.1
1.8
3.2
.
.
B3c - Academic Assistance or Tutoring: Mathematics
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
22
26.5
16
22.2
43
29.9
31
25.8
18
19.4
21
48.8
Good
#
35
37
74
70
54
14
Fair
%
42.2
51.4
51.4
58.3
58.1
32.6
9
#
20
12
21
17
21
8
#
6
7
6
2
.
.
#
54
39
87
80
70
16
%
81.8
69.6
79.8
85.1
83.3
80
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
24.1
16.7
14.6
14.2
22.6
18.6
%
76.2
75.4
78.6
85.4
81.6
83.3
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
15.2
23.2
18.3
11.7
16.7
20
#
48
46
88
82
71
20
%
7.2
9.7
4.2
1.7
.
.
#
57
53
117
101
72
35
%
68.7
73.6
81.3
84.2
77.4
81.4
B3d - Academic Assistance or Tutoring: Science
Bacc II
ECSU
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
5
8.3
20
18.2
16
15.8
18
20.7
9
25
Good
#
38
64
68
50
24
Fair
%
63.3
58.2
67.3
57.5
66.7
#
14
21
14
16
2
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
23.3
19.1
13.9
18.4
5.6
#
3
5
3
3
1
%
5
4.5
3
3.4
2.8
B3e - Academic Assistance or Tutoring: Study Skills
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
ECSU
%
71.7
76.4
83.2
78.2
91.7
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
20
29.9
31
46.3
14
20.9
2
3
51
76.1
2000
9
13.6
40
60.6
13
19.7
4
6.1
49
74.2
2002
26
22.2
67
57.3
21
17.9
3
2.6
93
79.5
2004
10
10.3
67
69.1
15
15.5
5
5.2
77
79.4
2006
14
15.7
55
61.8
20
22.5
.
.
69
77.5
2008
13
33.3
24
61.5
2
5.1
.
.
37
94.9
B3f - Academic Assistance or Tutoring: Overall
Bacc II
#
43
84
84
68
33
1998
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
18
21.7
26
18.7
25
21.6
19
19.4
17
34.7
Good
#
40
87
71
61
30
Fair
%
48.2
62.6
61.2
62.2
61.2
10
#
21
23
18
17
2
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
25.3
16.5
15.5
17.3
4.1
#
4
3
2
1
.
%
4.8
2.2
1.7
1
.
#
58
113
96
80
47
%
69.9
81.3
82.8
81.6
95.9
B4a - Library Services: Hours of Operation
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
68
41.7
36
29.3
74
39.8
67
39.4
49
39.2
40
45.5
Good
#
75
66
83
84
58
36
Fair
%
46
53.7
44.6
49.4
46.4
40.9
#
12
16
20
17
14
12
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
7.4
13
10.8
10
11.2
13.6
#
8
5
9
2
4
.
%
4.9
4.1
4.8
1.2
3.2
.
B4b - Library Services: Access to Databases and Collections
Excellent
Bacc II
ECSU
Good
Fair
ECSU
%
87.7
82.9
84.4
88.8
85.6
86.4
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
40
25
75
46.9
29
18.1
16
10
115
71.9
2000
22
18.8
65
55.6
20
17.1
10
8.5
87
74.4
2002
58
32.2
82
45.6
34
18.9
6
3.3
140
77.8
2004
56
33.7
87
52.4
19
11.4
4
2.4
143
86.1
2006
45
36.6
57
46.3
17
13.8
4
3.3
102
82.9
2008
31
37.8
44
53.7
7
8.5
.
.
75
91.5
B4c - Library Services: Training to Use Library
Bacc II
#
143
102
157
151
107
76
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
30
20
13
11.7
48
29.1
45
28.5
29
25.2
19
32.8
Good
#
68
59
65
75
52
31
Fair
%
45.3
53.2
39.4
47.5
45.2
53.4
11
#
36
30
36
30
27
8
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
24
27
21.8
19
23.5
13.8
#
16
9
16
8
7
.
%
10.7
8.1
9.7
5.1
6.1
.
#
98
72
113
120
81
50
%
65.3
64.9
68.5
75.9
70.4
86.2
B4d - Library Services: Overall
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
42
25.5
23
19.2
64
34.4
51
30.2
48
37.5
37
42
Good
#
86
75
90
96
61
45
Fair
%
52.1
62.5
48.4
56.8
47.7
51.1
#
29
20
25
18
16
6
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
17.6
16.7
13.4
10.7
12.5
6.8
#
8
2
7
4
3
.
%
4.8
1.7
3.8
2.4
2.3
.
B5a - Technology Services: Access to Internet
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
85
51.5
44
36.7
102
54.8
102
55.7
59
44.4
45
49.5
Good
#
57
56
61
68
54
32
Fair
%
34.5
46.7
32.8
37.2
40.6
35.2
#
18
10
14
11
16
3
#
5
10
9
2
4
11
%
3
8.3
4.8
1.1
3
12.1
B5b - Technology Services: Hours of Operation for Computer Center
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
55
33.7
41
35.3
78
42.2
87
48.3
47
36.4
26
29.9
Good
#
76
51
77
75
63
40
Fair
%
46.6
44
41.6
41.7
48.8
46
12
#
23
16
26
13
14
14
Poor
%
14.1
13.8
14.1
7.2
10.9
16.1
#
9
8
4
5
5
7
%
77.6
81.7
82.8
87
85.2
93.2
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
10.9
8.3
7.5
6
12
3.3
#
128
98
154
147
109
82
%
5.5
6.9
2.2
2.8
3.9
8
#
142
100
163
170
113
77
%
86.1
83.3
87.6
92.9
85
84.6
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
131
92
155
162
110
66
%
80.4
79.3
83.8
90
85.3
75.9
B5c - Technology Services: Access to Up-To-Date Facilities
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
47
29.7
26
23
57
30.8
68
38
40
32.3
35
39.3
Good
#
77
58
87
93
63
43
Fair
%
48.7
51.3
47
52
50.8
48.3
#
24
24
32
17
15
.
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
15.2
21.2
17.3
9.5
12.1
.
#
10
5
9
1
6
11
%
6.3
4.4
4.9
0.6
4.8
12.4
B5d - Technology Services: Access to Trained Staff
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
33
20.6
21
18.9
48
26.7
46
26.9
27
22.3
25
30.5
Good
#
74
54
84
83
61
36
Fair
%
46.3
48.6
46.7
48.5
50.4
43.9
#
44
31
35
35
24
21
#
9
5
13
7
9
.
%
5.6
4.5
7.2
4.1
7.4
.
B5e - Technology Services: Training Classes
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
23
19.8
9
13.2
40
27.6
46
33.3
29
30.5
28
47.5
Good
#
59
35
67
73
48
23
Fair
%
50.9
51.5
46.2
52.9
50.5
39
13
#
21
22
31
18
16
8
#
13
2
7
1
2
.
#
107
75
132
129
88
61
%
66.9
67.6
73.3
75.4
72.7
74.4
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
18.1
32.4
21.4
13
16.8
13.6
%
78.5
74.3
77.8
89.9
83.1
87.6
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
27.5
27.9
19.4
20.5
19.8
25.6
#
124
84
144
161
103
78
%
11.2
2.9
4.8
0.7
2.1
.
#
82
44
107
119
77
51
%
70.7
64.7
73.8
86.2
81.1
86.4
B5f - Technology Services: Overall
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
40
24.8
21
17.6
52
28.9
59
32.6
34
27.4
31
35.6
Good
#
87
70
91
103
73
45
Fair
%
54
58.8
50.6
56.9
58.9
51.7
#
30
26
30
19
16
5
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
18.6
21.8
16.7
10.5
12.9
5.7
#
4
2
7
.
1
6
%
2.5
1.7
3.9
.
0.8
6.9
B6a - Career-Related Services: Opportunity for Career Assistance
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
19
14.4
21
20.6
33
20.2
47
31.8
36
31
31
44.9
Good
#
73
58
87
83
64
31
Fair
%
55.3
56.9
53.4
56.1
55.2
44.9
#
34
19
37
14
14
6
#
6
4
6
4
2
1
%
4.5
3.9
3.7
2.7
1.7
1.4
B6b - Career-Related Services: Information on Internships or Other CareerRelated Experiences
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
21
15.4
27
24.8
31
18.6
56
34.6
43
36.8
35
41.7
Good
#
74
57
92
85
60
39
Fair
%
54.4
52.3
55.1
52.5
51.3
46.4
14
#
34
18
34
19
12
3
%
78.9
76.5
79.4
89.5
86.3
87.4
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
25.8
18.6
22.7
9.5
12.1
8.7
#
127
91
143
162
107
76
#
92
79
120
130
100
62
%
69.7
77.5
73.6
87.8
86.2
89.9
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
25
16.5
20.4
11.7
10.3
3.6
#
7
7
10
2
2
7
%
5.1
6.4
6
1.2
1.7
8.3
#
95
84
123
141
103
74
%
69.9
77.1
73.7
87
88
88.1
B6c - Career Related Services: Resources Available to Explore Career Options
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
21
14.9
23
22.3
31
19
50
32.1
36
29.8
32
41.6
Good
#
72
55
87
80
61
35
Fair
%
51.1
53.4
53.4
51.3
50.4
45.5
#
43
19
38
22
22
5
Poor
%
30.5
18.4
23.3
14.1
18.2
6.5
#
5
6
7
4
2
5
%
3.5
5.8
4.3
2.6
1.7
6.5
B6d - Career Related Services: Information Available Through Technology
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
34
22.8
31
28.2
43
25.1
63
38
40
33.3
35
39.3
Good
#
84
64
89
89
65
51
Fair
%
56.4
58.2
52
53.6
54.2
57.3
#
28
13
31
11
15
3
Poor
%
18.8
11.8
18.1
6.6
12.5
3.4
#
3
2
8
3
.
.
%
2
1.8
4.7
1.8
.
.
B6e - Career Related Services: Overall
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
22
14.8
22
20.4
34
19.8
50
31.3
36
29.8
33
40.7
Good
#
82
65
89
90
63
43
Fair
%
55
60.2
51.7
56.3
52.1
53.1
15
#
41
17
43
17
21
4
#
4
4
6
3
1
1
#
93
78
118
130
97
67
%
66
75.7
72.4
83.3
80.2
87
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
118
95
132
152
105
86
%
79.2
86.4
77.2
91.6
87.5
96.6
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
27.5
15.7
25
10.6
17.4
4.9
Excellent and
Good Combined
%
2.7
3.7
3.5
1.9
0.8
1.2
#
104
87
123
140
99
76
%
69.8
80.6
71.5
87.5
81.8
93.8
B7 - Timely Availability of Supplies and Materials From Bookstore
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
37
22.6
18
15.3
36
19
50
27.9
38
28.6
38
39.2
Good
#
85
73
99
107
70
34
Fair
%
51.8
61.9
52.4
59.8
52.6
35.1
#
31
23
40
19
23
15
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
18.9
19.5
21.2
10.6
17.3
15.5
#
11
4
14
3
2
10
%
6.7
3.4
7.4
1.7
1.5
10.3
#
122
91
135
157
108
72
Section C. Campus Safety, Class Size, and The Spoken English of Instructors
C1 - Do You Feel Campus Has Taken Sufficient Steps to
Ensure Your Physical Safety?
Yes
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
106
69
93
116
90
58
%
63.5
55.2
46.7
62
66.7
58
Not Sure
#
%
11
6.6
39
31.2
32
16.1
19
10.2
34
25.2
35
35
16
Yes and Not
Sure Combined
No
#
50
17
74
52
11
7
%
29.9
13.6
37.2
27.8
8.1
7
#
117
108
125
135
124
93
%
70.1
86.4
62.8
72.2
91.9
93
%
74.4
77.1
71.4
87.7
81.2
74.2
C2 - How Many of Your Classes Been Too Large For You To Learn Effectively?
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
Four or more
#
%
4
2.4
None
One
Three
Total
Two
#
88
%
51.8
#
41
%
24.1
#
10
%
5.9
#
27
%
15.9
#
170
%
100
2000
4
3.3
75
61
20
16.3
4
3.3
20
16.3
123
100
2002
6
3
123
61.5
39
19.5
10
5
22
11
200
100
2004
2
1.1
108
58.1
46
24.7
6
3.2
24
12.9
186
100
2006
2
1.5
76
56.7
35
26.1
7
5.2
14
10.4
134
100
2008
3
3
56
56
28
28
.
.
13
13
100
100
C3 - In How Many of Your Classes Have You Had Difficulty Understanding The Spoken English of
the Instructor?
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Four or more
#
%
20
11.7
21
16.9
32
16
21
11.2
4
3
.
.
None
#
23
22
38
54
25
39
One
%
13.5
17.7
19
28.9
18.5
39
#
49
24
49
43
46
28
17
Three
%
28.7
19.4
24.5
23
34.1
28
#
30
22
26
26
17
5
Total
Two
%
17.5
17.7
13
13.9
12.6
5
#
49
35
55
43
43
28
%
28.7
28.2
27.5
23
31.9
28
#
171
124
200
187
135
100
%
100
100
100
100
100
100
Section D. Other Office That Serve You
Based on your experience so far, how would you evaluate each of the following services? If you have not had enough
experience with a service to evaluate it, please mark the response “Don't know/did not use,” and skip to the next service. For
those services that require interaction with staff secretaries, tutors, counselors, office workers, or other people, Please rate how
responsive those staff people were to your needs.
D1b - Office Evaluation: Registration (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
10
5.8
15
12.1
26
13.4
57
31.3
19
14
13
14.6
Good
#
77
67
88
93
74
32
Fair
%
45
54
45.4
51.1
54.4
36
#
50
35
55
28
34
33
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
29.2
28.2
28.4
15.4
25
37.1
#
34
7
25
4
9
11
%
19.9
5.6
12.9
2.2
6.6
12.4
D1c - Office Evaluation: Registration (Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
17
11.8
8
8.2
10
8.1
34
21.7
9
8.2
10
11.6
Good
#
56
52
53
85
58
33
Fair
%
38.9
53.1
42.7
54.1
52.7
38.4
18
#
46
28
37
34
38
21
#
25
10
24
4
5
22
%
50.9
66.1
58.8
82.4
68.4
50.6
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
31.9
28.6
29.8
21.7
34.5
24.4
#
87
82
114
150
93
45
%
17.4
10.2
19.4
2.5
4.5
25.6
#
73
60
63
119
67
43
%
50.7
61.2
50.8
75.8
60.9
50
D2b - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
Excellent-4
#
%
16
9.7
10
8.3
Good-3
#
66
64
Fair-2
%
40
52.9
#
49
32
%
29.7
26.4
Poor-1
#
34
15
%
20.6
12.4
D2c - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid (Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
Excellent-4
#
%
19
13.6
8
8.4
Good-3
#
48
46
Fair-2
%
34.3
48.4
#
44
25
%
31.4
26.3
Poor-1
#
29
16
%
20.7
16.8
D2ab - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid - Application (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
29
15.8
51
28.5
16
12.2
9
13.2
Good
#
65
81
57
29
Fair
%
35.3
45.3
43.5
42.6
#
48
39
48
19
#
42
8
10
11
%
22.8
4.5
7.6
16.2
D2ac - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid - Application (Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
8
6.6
32
20.6
5
5.4
13
34.2
Good
#
47
81
41
23
Fair
%
38.5
52.3
44.1
60.5
19
#
39
33
36
1
Poor
%
32
21.3
38.7
2.6
#
28
9
11
1
#
82
74
%
49.7
61.2
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
67
54
%
47.9
56.8
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
26.1
21.8
36.6
27.9
Excellent and
Good Combined
%
23
5.8
11.8
2.6
#
94
132
73
38
%
51.1
73.7
55.7
55.9
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
55
113
46
36
%
45.1
72.9
49.5
94.7
D2bb - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid - Disbursement (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
21
12
40
23.4
13
10.4
12
20.3
Good
#
67
82
51
30
Fair
%
38.3
48
40.8
50.8
#
43
40
43
12
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
24.6
23.4
34.4
20.3
#
44
9
18
5
%
25.1
5.3
14.4
8.5
D2bc - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid - Disbursement (Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
5
4.4
34
23.3
12
11.9
29
39.2
Good
#
46
77
44
38
Fair
%
40.4
52.7
43.6
51.4
#
37
28
38
2
Poor
%
32.5
19.2
37.6
2.7
#
26
7
7
5
%
22.8
4.8
6.9
6.8
D3b - Office Evaluation: Food Services (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
3
2.4
3
3.4
10
6.8
21
14.7
6
5.1
25
43.1
Good
#
30
27
43
50
35
21
Fair
%
23.8
31
29.1
35
29.7
36.2
20
#
46
41
47
34
49
3
#
47
16
48
38
28
9
%
50.3
71.3
51.2
71.2
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
51
111
56
67
%
44.7
76
55.4
90.5
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
36.5
47.1
31.8
23.8
41.5
5.2
#
88
122
64
42
%
37.3
18.4
32.4
26.6
23.7
15.5
#
33
30
53
71
41
46
%
26.2
34.5
35.8
49.7
34.7
79.3
D3c - Office Evaluation: Food Services (Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
12
10.9
6
8.7
7
7.4
24
19.5
3
3.2
16
27.6
Good
#
41
33
36
60
40
34
Fair
%
37.3
47.8
38.3
48.8
43
58.6
#
38
22
29
23
40
5
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
34.5
31.9
30.9
18.7
43
8.6
#
19
8
22
16
10
3
%
17.3
11.6
23.4
13
10.8
5.2
D4b - Office Evaluation: Health Services (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
13
10.8
11
11.5
20
14.4
33
23.9
11
9.8
11
12.6
Good
#
60
55
75
76
51
30
Fair
%
50
57.3
54
55.1
45.5
34.5
#
38
25
29
25
39
23
#
9
5
15
4
11
23
%
7.5
5.2
10.8
2.9
9.8
26.4
D4c - Office Evaluation: Health Services (Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
16
15.7
14
18.9
10
11.5
35
28.9
6
6.9
12
16.4
Good
#
46
41
43
60
39
25
Fair
%
45.1
55.4
49.4
49.6
44.8
34.2
21
#
32
18
25
23
37
33
#
8
1
9
3
5
3
#
73
66
95
109
62
41
%
60.8
68.8
68.3
79
55.4
47.1
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
31.4
24.3
28.7
19
42.5
45.2
%
48.2
56.5
45.7
68.3
46.2
86.2
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
31.7
26
20.9
18.1
34.8
26.4
#
53
39
43
84
43
50
%
7.8
1.4
10.3
2.5
5.7
4.1
#
62
55
53
95
45
37
%
60.8
74.3
60.9
78.5
51.7
50.7
D5b - Office Evaluation: Personal, Interpersonal, or Psychological Counseling
(Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
4
5.4
5
10.6
17
14.5
29
26.9
10
12.2
17
47.2
Good
#
39
25
59
63
43
17
Fair
%
52.7
53.2
50.4
58.3
52.4
47.2
#
25
16
31
13
26
2
Poor
%
33.8
34
26.5
12
31.7
5.6
#
6
1
10
3
3
.
%
8.1
2.1
8.5
2.8
3.7
.
D5c - Office Evaluation: Personal, Interpersonal, or Psychological Counseling
(Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
6
9.7
3
9.7
5
7.6
25
26.9
7
11.9
13
20
Good
#
33
21
33
51
31
27
Fair
%
53.2
67.7
50
54.8
52.5
41.5
#
19
6
18
14
20
17
Poor
%
30.6
19.4
27.3
15.1
33.9
26.2
#
4
1
10
3
1
8
%
6.5
3.2
15.2
3.2
1.7
12.3
D6b - Office Evaluation: Business Services (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
24
15.9
7
6.5
25
14.5
44
25.9
22
16.5
5
8.1
Good
#
80
70
88
97
73
51
Fair
%
53
64.8
50.9
57.1
54.9
82.3
22
#
36
24
42
27
35
5
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
11
7
18
2
3
1
%
58.1
63.8
65
85.2
64.6
94.4
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
39
24
38
76
38
40
%
62.9
77.4
57.6
81.7
64.4
61.5
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
23.8
22.2
24.3
15.9
26.3
8.1
#
43
30
76
92
53
34
%
7.3
6.5
10.4
1.2
2.3
1.6
#
104
77
113
141
95
56
%
68.9
71.3
65.3
82.9
71.4
90.3
D6c - Office Evaluation: Business Services (Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
19
15.7
9
10.8
11
10.3
35
24
9
8.7
14
22.6
Good
#
57
44
58
84
55
31
Fair
%
47.1
53
54.2
57.5
52.9
50
#
33
24
21
25
34
11
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
27.3
28.9
19.6
17.1
32.7
17.7
#
12
6
17
2
6
6
%
9.9
7.2
15.9
1.4
5.8
9.7
D7b - Office Evaluation: Residence Life (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
9
7.9
3
3.6
9
6.5
27
20.1
18
16.5
3
3
Good
#
40
40
63
64
55
.
Fair
%
35.1
47.6
45.3
47.8
50.5
.
#
47
31
48
27
30
89
#
18
10
19
16
6
7
%
15.8
11.9
13.7
11.9
5.5
7.1
D7c - Office Evaluation: Residence Life (Staff Responsiveness)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
9
9.5
4
6.1
2
2.2
18
15.8
7
8.2
.
.
Good
#
35
29
37
61
42
.
Fair
%
36.8
43.9
41.1
53.5
49.4
.
23
#
41
23
35
25
33
68
#
10
10
16
10
3
22
#
49
43
72
91
73
3
%
43
51.2
51.8
67.9
67
3
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
43.2
34.8
38.9
21.9
38.8
75.6
%
62.8
63.9
64.5
81.5
61.5
72.6
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
41.2
36.9
34.5
20.1
27.5
89.9
#
76
53
69
119
64
45
%
10.5
15.2
17.8
8.8
3.5
24.4
#
44
33
39
79
49
0
%
46.3
50
43.3
69.3
57.6
0
D8b - Office Evaluation: Opportunities to Participate in Campus Recreational
Activities (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Excellent
#
%
24
18.2
13
13.5
28
17
46
30.1
27
22.3
Good
#
58
54
91
82
69
Fair
%
43.9
56.3
55.2
53.6
57
#
35
25
31
20
23
Poor
%
26.5
26
18.8
13.1
19
#
15
4
15
5
2
%
11.4
4.2
9.1
3.3
1.7
D9b - Office Evaluation: Opportunities to Participate in Community Service
Projects (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Excellent
#
%
14
11.6
11
12.2
27
17.5
29
21
17
15.6
Good
#
54
53
79
77
57
Fair
%
44.6
58.9
51.3
55.8
52.3
#
39
21
32
25
27
Poor
%
32.2
23.3
20.8
18.1
24.8
#
14
5
16
7
8
%
11.6
5.6
10.4
5.1
7.3
D10b - Office Evaluation: Opportunities to Develop Leadership Skills (Service)
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Excellent
#
%
20
13.7
16
15.2
24
14.4
50
32.7
25
20
Good
#
72
67
90
80
64
Fair
%
49.3
63.8
53.9
52.3
51.2
24
#
48
18
36
21
33
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
32.9
17.1
21.6
13.7
26.4
#
6
4
17
2
3
%
4.1
3.8
10.2
1.3
2.4
#
82
67
119
128
96
%
62.1
69.8
72.1
83.7
79.3
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
68
64
106
106
74
%
56.2
71.1
68.8
76.8
67.9
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
92
83
114
130
89
%
63
79
68.3
85
71.2
Section E. You Conclusions
E1 - All Things Considered, How Would You Characterize the Intellectual Environment on This
Campus? (Old Question)*
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
Very Strong-5
#
%
.
.
2
1.6
Strong-4
#
%
29
17
16
12.8
Average-3
#
%
116
67.8
95
76
Weak-2
#
18
12
Very Weak-1
#
%
8
4.7
.
.
%
10.5
9.6
E1 - All Things Considered, How Would You Characterize the Intellectual
Environment on This Campus? (New Question)*
Very Strong
Bacc II
ECSU
2002
2004
2006
#
7
20
9
%
3.5
10.7
6.6
Strong
#
122
123
95
Weak
%
60.7
65.8
69.9
#
63
41
32
Very Weak
%
31.3
21.9
23.5
#
9
3
.
%
4.5
1.6
.
E2 - How Would You Evaluate the Quality of Instruction?
Bacc II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Excellent
#
%
8
5
7
5.6
15
7.5
24
12.8
18
13.5
Good
#
99
76
106
122
82
Fair
%
62.3
60.8
52.7
65.2
61.7
25
#
48
41
69
41
33
#
4
1
11
.
.
#
29
18
(New) Very
strong
& Strong
Combined
#
%
129
64.2
143
76.5
104
76.5
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
30.2
32.8
34.3
21.9
24.8
(Old) Very strong
& Strong
Combined
%
2.5
0.8
5.5
.
.
#
107
83
121
146
100
%
67.3
66.4
60.2
78.1
75.2
%
17
14.4
Bacc II
ECSU
Bacc II
Bacc II
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
ECSU
ECSU
E3 - How Would You Evaluate the Overall Education You are Receiving?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
16
9.4
93
54.4
55
32.2
7
4.1
12
9.8
82
66.7
27
22
2
1.6
22
11.1
114
57.6
54
27.3
8
4
27
14.5
127
68.3
29
15.6
3
1.6
22
16.3
80
59.3
33
24.4
.
.
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
E4 - Do You Plan to Complete You Degree Program at this
Institution?
Yes
Not Sure
No
#
%
#
%
#
%
128
75.3
30
17.6
12
7.1
94
77
4
3.3
24
19.7
144
72
44
22
12
6
140
75.7
31
16.8
14
7.6
109
82
17
12.8
7
5.3
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
E5 - If You Could Start Over Would You Choose to
Attend This Institution?
Yes
Not Sure
No
#
%
#
%
#
%
68
40
48
28.2
54
31.8
37
29.6
36
28.8
52
41.6
68
34.3
75
37.9
55
27.8
100
53.8
40
21.5
46
24.7
69
50.7
43
31.6
24
17.6
26
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
109
94
136
154
102
Yes and Not
Sure Combined
#
158
98
188
171
126
%
92.9
80.3
94
92.4
94.7
Yes and Not
Sure Combined
#
116
73
143
140
112
%
68.2
58.4
72.2
75.3
82.4
%
63.7
76.4
68.7
82.8
75.6