Elizabeth City State University
The Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Research, and Assessment
Graduating Senior Survey Analysis 1998-2008
The University of North Carolina-General Administration (UNC-GA) developed a system of student surveys to help evaluate
institutional performance. During the spring 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2008 semester, all sixteen UNC campuses conducted a
survey of graduating seniors. The purpose of the Graduating Senior Survey is to gather information concerning the undergraduate
experience at Elizabeth City State University. Questions concerning the students’ assessment of faculty contributions, academic
environment, satisfaction with services, knowledge & skill development and evaluation of campus atmosphere are compiled in this
report.
Section A. Faculty Contribution
Please evaluate how well faculty members in your major department do each of the following.
A1 - Faculty Set High Expectations For You To Learn
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
.
4
1
1
6
1
%
.
2.3
0.6
0.5
3.7
0.8
Excellent
#
100
70
41
81
67
64
%
42.7
40.5
24.6
42.6
41.1
49.6
Good
#
114
87
100
94
79
52
1
%
48.7
50.3
59.9
49.5
48.5
40.3
Fair
#
19
9
21
13
9
11
Poor
%
8.1
5.2
12.6
6.8
5.5
8.5
#
1
3
4
1
2
1
%
0.4
1.7
2.4
0.5
1.2
0.8
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
214
91.5
157
92.9
141
84.9
175
92.6
146
93.0
116
90.6
%
1.3
1.7
3
0.5
1.2
.
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
196
83.8
145
85.3
133
80.1
167
88.4
143
91.1
117
91.4
%
1.7
1.2
3
1.6
0.6
.
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
206
88
154
91.1
130
80.2
175
92.6
145
94.8
118
93.7
%
2.6
2.3
4.8
2.6
1.2
1.6
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
197
84.5
137
80.6
125
76.2
165
86.8
142
91.6
114
89.1
A2 - Faculty Respect Diverse Learning Styles
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
.
3
1
1
6
1
%
.
1.7
0.6
0.5
3.7
0.8
Excellent
#
85
53
36
80
65
55
%
36.3
30.6
21.6
42.1
39.9
42.6
Good
#
111
92
97
87
78
62
%
47.4
53.2
58.1
45.8
47.9
48.1
Fair
#
35
22
28
21
12
11
Poor
%
15
12.7
16.8
11.1
7.4
8.5
#
3
3
5
1
2
.
A3 - Faculty Encourage You To Be An Active Learner
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
.
4
5
1
10
3
%
.
2.3
3
0.5
6.1
2.3
Excellent
#
106
73
47
98
72
64
%
45.3
42.2
28.1
51.6
44.2
49.6
Good
#
100
81
83
77
73
54
%
42.7
46.8
49.7
40.5
44.8
41.9
Fair
#
24
13
27
11
7
8
Poor
%
10.3
7.5
16.2
5.8
4.3
6.2
#
4
2
5
3
1
.
A4 - Faculty Encourage Student-Faculty Interaction
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
1
3
3
.
8
1
%
0.4
1.7
1.8
.
4.9
0.8
Excellent
#
95
58
47
81
66
59
%
40.6
33.5
28.1
42.6
40.5
45.7
Good
#
102
79
78
84
76
55
2
%
43.6
45.7
46.7
44.2
46.6
42.6
Fair
#
30
29
31
20
11
12
Poor
%
12.8
16.8
18.6
10.5
6.7
9.3
#
6
4
8
5
2
2
%
3.4
4
3
1.1
3.1
1.6
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
199
85.8
143
84.6
121
74.2
161
84.7
138
89.6
110
86.6
%
1.7
1.2
3
0.5
0.6
.
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
212
91.8
154
91.1
132
80.5
173
91.1
145
93.5
115
90.6
A5 - Faculty Provide Frequent Feedback
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
2
4
4
.
9
2
%
0.9
2.3
2.4
.
5.5
1.6
Excellent
#
88
57
33
71
62
51
%
37.6
32.9
19.8
37.4
38
39.5
Good
#
111
86
88
90
76
59
%
47.4
49.7
52.7
47.4
46.6
45.7
Fair
#
25
19
37
27
11
15
Poor
%
10.7
11
22.2
14.2
6.7
11.6
#
8
7
5
2
5
2
A6 - Faculty Encourage You to Devote Time and Energy to Coursework
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
3
4
3
.
8
2
%
1.3
2.3
1.8
.
4.9
1.6
Excellent
#
115
80
42
85
72
60
%
49.1
46.2
25.1
44.7
44.2
46.5
Good
#
97
74
90
88
73
55
3
%
41.5
42.8
53.9
46.3
44.8
42.6
Fair
#
15
13
27
16
9
12
Poor
%
6.4
7.5
16.2
8.4
5.5
9.3
#
4
2
5
1
1
.
%
0.9
2.3
3
1.6
0.6
.
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
202
86.7
143
85.1
133
80.1
168
88.4
146
93.6
121
94.5
%
1.7
2.3
3
1.1
1.2
0.8
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
199
85.8
147
87.5
134
81.2
174
91.6
138
91.4
117
92.1
%
1.3
2.3
1.8
1.1
1.2
.
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
208
89.7
150
88.8
133
83.1
169
88.9
140
92.7
121
94.5
A7 - Faculty Develop Cooperative Learning Opportunities
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
1
5
1
.
7
1
Excellent
%
0.4
2.9
0.6
.
4.3
0.8
#
100
53
38
78
66
56
%
42.7
30.6
22.8
41.1
40.5
43.4
Good
#
102
90
95
90
80
65
%
43.6
52
56.9
47.4
49.1
50.4
Fair
#
29
21
28
19
9
7
Poor
%
12.4
12.1
16.8
10
5.5
5.4
#
2
4
5
3
1
.
A8 - Faculty Care About Your Academic Success
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
2
5
2
.
12
2
Excellent
%
0.9
2.9
1.2
.
7.4
1.6
#
111
66
43
85
70
65
%
47.4
38.2
25.7
44.7
42.9
50.4
Good
#
88
81
91
89
68
52
%
37.6
46.8
54.5
46.8
41.7
40.3
Fair
#
29
17
26
14
11
9
Poor
%
12.4
9.8
15.6
7.4
6.7
7
#
4
4
5
2
2
1
A9 - Evaluation of Instructors on These Previous Eight Measures
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
2
4
7
.
12
1
%
0.9
2.3
4.2
.
7.4
0.8
Excellent
#
97
70
41
83
67
58
%
41.5
40.5
24.6
43.7
41.1
45
Good
#
111
80
92
86
73
63
4
%
47.4
46.2
55.1
45.3
44.8
48.8
Fair
#
21
15
24
19
9
7
Poor
%
9
8.7
14.4
10
5.5
5.4
#
3
4
3
2
2
.
Section B. Help Outside the Classroom
Based on your last two years on this campus, how would you evaluate each of the following? (If you have not had enough experience with a
service to evaluate it, please mark "Don't know/did not use,” then skip to the next service.)
%
3.4
3.5
4.2
4.2
4.9
4.7
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
203
87.9
150
87.2
129
77.2
143
78.1
133
84.2
110
87.3
%
4.7
4
4.2
7.4
5.5
4.7
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
196
85.6
140
82.4
130
78.3
129
71.3
133
85.8
101
82.8
B1a - Academic Advising in Your Major: Access to Advisor
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
3
1
.
7
5
3
%
1.3
0.6
.
3.7
3.1
2.3
Excellent
#
101
74
44
66
75
65
%
43.2
42.8
26.3
34.7
46
50.4
Good
#
102
76
85
77
58
45
%
43.6
43.9
50.9
40.5
35.6
34.9
Fair
#
20
16
31
32
17
10
Poor
%
8.5
9.2
18.6
16.8
10.4
7.8
#
8
6
7
8
8
6
B1b - Academic Advising in Your Major: Sufficient Time With Advisor
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
5
3
1
9
8
7
%
2.1
1.7
0.6
4.7
4.9
5.4
Excellent
#
99
70
37
68
71
54
%
42.3
40.5
22.2
35.8
43.6
41.9
Good
#
97
70
93
61
62
47
5
%
41.5
40.5
55.7
32.1
38
36.4
Fair
#
22
23
29
38
13
15
Poor
%
9.4
13.3
17.4
20
8
11.6
#
11
7
7
14
9
6
B1c - Academic Advising in Your Major: Accurate Information About Degree
Requirements and Course Sequencing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
6
2.6
4
2.3
4
2.4
5
2.6
6
3.7
6
4.7
Excellent
#
%
88
37.6
75
43.4
42
25.1
66
34.7
73
44.8
54
41.9
Good
#
101
67
83
64
54
54
%
43.2
38.7
49.7
33.7
33.1
41.9
Fair
#
32
19
32
44
24
10
Excellent and
Good
Combined
Poor
%
13.7
11
19.2
23.2
14.7
7.8
#
7
8
6
11
6
5
%
3
4.6
3.6
5.8
3.7
3.9
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
11
6
2
10
6
6
%
4.7
3.5
1.2
5.3
3.7
4.7
Excellent
#
77
55
32
63
66
52
%
32.9
31.8
19.2
33.2
40.5
40.3
Good
#
97
76
91
80
68
60
%
41.5
43.9
54.5
42.1
41.7
46.5
Fair
#
38
29
36
33
20
7
%
4.7
4
3.6
2.1
1.8
3.1
%
3
3.5
3
1.6
1.8
3.1
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
180
79.3
138
83.1
124
77.5
148
80.9
129
84.3
116
92.1
Poor
%
16.2
16.8
21.6
17.4
12.3
5.4
#
11
7
6
4
3
4
B1e - Academic Advising in Your Major: Academic Advising Services Overall
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
7
7
7
7
10
3
%
3
4
4.2
3.7
6.1
2.3
Excellent
#
84
58
40
70
69
61
%
35.9
33.5
24
36.8
42.3
47.3
Good
#
96
80
84
78
60
55
6
%
41
46.2
50.3
41.1
36.8
42.6
Fair
#
40
22
31
32
21
6
Poor
%
17.1
12.7
18.6
16.8
12.9
4.7
#
7
6
5
3
3
4
%
82.9
84
76.7
70.3
80.9
87.8
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
174
78
131
78.4
123
74.5
143
79.4
134
85.4
112
91.1
B1d - Academic Advising in Your Major: Knowledge of Campus Policies and Procedures
Missing
#
189
142
125
130
127
108
%
6.8
2.9
3.6
2.1
3.1
3.9
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
170
75.6
139
83.2
136
85
140
85.9
131
91.6
94
86.2
%
7.3
2.3
3.6
1.6
1.8
0.8
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
168
75.3
135
81.3
134
84.8
139
86.9
125
87.4
96
88.9
B2a - Library Services: Hours of Operation
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
9
6
7
27
20
20
%
3.8
3.5
4.2
14.2
12.3
15.5
Excellent
#
64
63
41
64
61
50
%
27.4
36.4
24.6
33.7
37.4
38.8
Good
#
106
76
95
76
70
44
%
45.3
43.9
56.9
40
42.9
34.1
Fair
#
39
23
18
19
7
10
Poor
%
16.7
13.3
10.8
10
4.3
7.8
#
16
5
6
4
5
5
B2b - Library Services: Staff Responsiveness
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
11
7
9
30
20
21
%
4.7
4
5.4
15.8
12.3
16.3
Excellent
#
65
60
33
54
56
45
%
27.8
34.7
19.8
28.4
34.4
34.9
Good
#
103
75
101
85
69
51
7
%
44
43.4
60.5
44.7
42.3
39.5
Fair
#
38
27
18
18
15
11
Poor
%
16.2
15.6
10.8
9.5
9.2
8.5
#
17
4
6
3
3
1
%
5.6
1.7
4.2
1.6
1.8
2.3
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
164
72.6
135
82.3
131
83.4
139
86.9
126
87.5
94
88.7
%
4.3
1.2
3
0.5
1.2
.
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
165
78.6
143
84.1
132
83
143
87.7
131
91.6
99
93.4
%
4.3
1.2
3.6
1.1
3.1
3.1
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
163
77.3
138
84.7
135
86
172
93.5
134
88.2
112
91.1
B2c - Library Services: Access to Databases and Collections
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
8
9
10
30
19
23
%
3.4
5.2
6
15.8
11.7
17.8
Excellent
#
68
52
37
55
54
47
%
29.1
30.1
22.2
28.9
33.1
36.4
Good
#
96
83
94
84
72
47
%
41
48
56.3
44.2
44.2
36.4
Fair
#
49
26
19
18
15
9
Poor
%
20.9
15
11.4
9.5
9.2
7
#
13
3
7
3
3
3
B2d - Library Services: Overall
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
24
3
8
27
20
23
%
10.3
1.7
4.8
14.2
12.3
17.8
Excellent
#
82
47
36
60
53
47
%
35
27.2
21.6
31.6
32.5
36.4
Good
#
83
96
96
83
78
52
%
35.5
55.5
57.5
43.7
47.9
40.3
Fair
#
35
25
22
19
10
7
Poor
%
15
14.5
13.2
10
6.1
5.4
#
10
2
5
1
2
.
B3a - Technology Services: Access to Internet
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
23
10
10
6
11
6
%
9.8
5.8
6
3.2
6.7
4.7
Excellent
#
80
78
56
111
76
75
%
34.2
45.1
33.5
58.4
46.6
58.1
Good
#
83
60
79
61
58
37
8
%
35.5
34.7
47.3
32.1
35.6
28.7
Fair
#
38
23
16
10
13
7
Poor
%
16.2
13.3
9.6
5.3
8
5.4
#
10
2
6
2
5
4
%
3.8
1.7
3
3.2
3.7
3.1
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
156
76.5
134
82.7
131
83.4
157
86.7
130
86.7
112
91.1
%
4.3
2.9
2.4
.
1.8
.
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
158
76.3
133
81.1
131
82.9
156
87.2
128
85.3
108
88.5
%
8.5
2.9
4.2
3.7
3.1
0.8
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
110
69.2
127
79.4
121
79.1
137
78.7
123
82.6
103
86.6
B3b - Technology Services: Hours of Operation for Computer Center
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
30
11
10
9
13
6
%
12.8
6.4
6
4.7
8
4.7
Excellent
#
73
60
44
93
67
62
%
31.2
34.7
26.3
48.9
41.1
48.1
Good
#
83
74
87
64
63
50
%
35.5
42.8
52.1
33.7
38.7
38.8
Fair
#
39
25
21
18
14
7
Poor
%
16.7
14.5
12.6
9.5
8.6
5.4
#
9
3
5
6
6
4
B3c - Technology Services: Access to Up-To-Date Facilities
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
27
9
9
11
13
7
%
11.5
5.2
5.4
5.8
8
5.4
Excellent
#
65
56
41
84
59
56
%
27.8
32.4
24.6
44.2
36.2
43.4
Good
#
93
77
90
72
69
52
%
39.7
44.5
53.9
37.9
42.3
40.3
Fair
#
39
26
23
23
19
14
Poor
%
16.7
15
13.8
12.1
11.7
10.9
#
10
5
4
.
3
.
B3d - Technology Services: Access to Trained Staff
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
75
13
14
16
14
10
%
32.1
7.5
8.4
8.4
8.6
7.8
Excellent
#
40
54
28
70
58
55
%
17.1
31.2
16.8
36.8
35.6
42.6
Good
#
70
73
93
67
65
48
9
%
29.9
42.2
55.7
35.3
39.9
37.2
Fair
#
29
28
25
30
21
15
Poor
%
12.4
16.2
15
15.8
12.9
11.6
#
20
5
7
7
5
1
%
5.1
2.3
3.6
1.6
1.8
1.6
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
150
75.4
112
78.9
110
78.6
122
83
118
85.5
101
88.6
%
4.3
1.2
1.8
0.5
1.8
0.8
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
136
78.6
134
82.7
132
84.6
162
89.5
134
87.6
108
90
%
.
3.5
4.2
4.2
1.8
1.6
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
116
78.4
118
80.8
122
76.7
127
89.4
101
90.2
B3e - Technology Services: Training Classes
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
35
31
27
43
25
15
%
15
17.9
16.2
22.6
15.3
11.6
Excellent
#
59
47
26
63
54
53
%
25.2
27.2
15.6
33.2
33.1
41.1
Good
#
91
65
84
59
64
48
%
38.9
37.6
50.3
31.1
39.3
37.2
Fair
#
37
26
24
22
17
11
Poor
%
15.8
15
14.4
11.6
10.4
8.5
#
12
4
6
3
3
2
B3f - Technology Services: Overall
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
61
11
11
9
10
9
%
26.1
6.4
6.6
4.7
6.1
7
Excellent
#
51
53
37
80
65
61
%
21.8
30.6
22.2
42.1
39.9
47.3
Good
#
85
81
95
82
69
47
%
36.3
46.8
56.9
43.2
42.3
36.4
Fair
#
27
26
21
18
16
11
Poor
%
11.5
15
12.6
9.5
9.8
8.5
#
10
2
3
1
3
1
B4a - Career-Related Services: Opportunity for Career Assistance*
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
234
25
21
31
21
17
%
100
14.5
12.6
16.3
12.9
13.2
Excellent
#
.
65
33
50
64
43
%
.
37.6
19.8
26.3
39.3
33.3
Good
#
.
51
85
72
63
58
10
%
.
29.5
50.9
37.9
38.7
45
Fair
#
.
26
21
29
12
9
Poor
%
.
15
12.6
15.3
7.4
7
#
.
6
7
8
3
2
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
B4b - Career-Related Services: Information on Internships or Other Career-Related
Experiences
Missing
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
234
100
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
21
12.1
59
34.1
70
40.5
18
10.4
5
2.9
17
10.2
42
25.1
82
49.1
20
12
6
3.6
26
13.7
55
28.9
69
36.3
33
17.4
7
3.7
24
14.7
66
40.5
57
35
14
8.6
2
1.2
14
10.9
46
35.7
52
40.3
15
11.6
2
1.6
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
129
84.9
124
82.7
124
75.6
123
88.5
98
85.2
B4c - Career Related Services: Resources Available to Explore Career Options
%
.
3.5
3.6
2.6
1.2
1.6
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
117
80.1
124
83.2
119
72.1
122
87.8
102
89.5
%
.
1.2
3.6
1.6
.
0.8
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
127
84.1
124
84.4
137
81.1
127
90.7
107
93.9
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
234
27
18
25
24
15
%
100
15.6
10.8
13.2
14.7
11.6
Excellent
#
.
49
33
53
63
47
%
.
28.3
19.8
27.9
38.7
36.4
Good
#
.
68
91
66
59
55
%
.
39.3
54.5
34.7
36.2
42.6
Fair
#
.
23
19
41
15
10
Poor
%
.
13.3
11.4
21.6
9.2
7.8
#
.
6
6
5
2
2
B4d - Career Related Services: Information Available Through Technology
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
234
22
20
21
23
15
%
100
12.7
12
11.1
14.1
11.6
Excellent
#
.
60
32
72
63
48
%
.
34.7
19.2
37.9
38.7
37.2
Good
#
.
67
92
65
64
59
11
%
.
38.7
55.1
34.2
39.3
45.7
Fair
#
.
22
17
29
13
6
Poor
%
.
12.7
10.2
15.3
8
4.7
#
.
2
6
3
.
1
%
.
4
3.6
2.6
.
0.8
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
124
82.7
125
84.5
132
77.6
130
90.9
105
92.1
%
.
4.6
4.2
7.9
2.5
2.3
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
112
76.2
121
82.9
121
74.7
121
86.4
102
87.9
%
.
7.5
5.4
7.9
2.5
3.1
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
105
72.9
114
78.1
118
73.8
122
88.4
102
90.3
B4e - Career Related Services: Overall
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
234
23
19
20
20
15
%
100
13.3
11.4
10.5
12.3
11.6
Excellent
#
.
57
35
52
67
44
%
.
32.9
21
27.4
41.1
34.1
Good
#
.
67
90
80
63
61
%
.
38.7
53.9
42.1
38.7
47.3
Fair
#
.
19
17
33
13
8
Poor
%
.
11
10.2
17.4
8
6.2
#
.
7
6
5
.
1
B5a - Employment Search Assistance: Resume Preparation
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
234
26
21
28
23
13
%
100
15
12.6
14.7
14.1
10.1
Excellent
#
.
59
40
58
63
58
%
.
34.1
24
30.5
38.7
45
Good
#
.
53
81
63
58
44
%
.
30.6
48.5
33.2
35.6
34.1
Fair
#
.
27
18
26
15
11
Poor
%
.
15.6
10.8
13.7
9.2
8.5
#
.
8
7
15
4
3
B5b - Employment Search Assistance: Interview Preparation
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
234
29
21
30
25
16
%
100
16.8
12.6
15.8
15.3
12.4
Excellent
#
.
52
34
51
64
54
%
.
30.1
20.4
26.8
39.3
41.9
Good
#
.
53
80
67
58
48
12
%
.
30.6
47.9
35.3
35.6
37.2
Fair
#
.
26
23
27
12
7
Poor
%
.
15
13.8
14.2
7.4
5.4
#
.
13
9
15
4
4
%
.
5.8
4.8
3.7
2.5
2.3
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
119
77.3
119
80.4
138
78.4
131
91
100
86.2
%
.
5.8
4.8
6.8
2.5
2.3
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
0
.
119
76.8
110
78.6
128
75.3
123
87.9
99
84.6
B5c - Employment Search Assistance: Access to Employment Opportunities
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
234
19
19
14
19
13
%
100
11
11.4
7.4
11.7
10.1
Excellent
#
.
55
33
63
68
51
%
.
31.8
19.8
33.2
41.7
39.5
Good
#
.
64
86
75
63
49
%
.
37
51.5
39.5
38.7
38
Fair
#
.
25
21
31
9
13
Poor
%
.
14.5
12.6
16.3
5.5
10.1
#
.
10
8
7
4
3
B5d - Employment Search Assistance: Overall
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
234
18
27
20
23
12
%
100
10.4
16.2
10.5
14.1
9.3
Excellent
#
.
51
38
50
62
55
%
.
29.5
22.8
26.3
38
42.6
Good
#
.
68
72
78
61
44
13
%
.
39.3
43.1
41.1
37.4
34.1
Fair
#
.
26
22
29
13
15
Poor
%
.
15
13.2
15.3
8
11.6
#
.
10
8
13
4
3
Section C. Knowledge, Skills, and Personal Growth
C1a - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge Related
to: Writing Skills?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
30
12.8
4
2.3
14
8.4
1
0.5
10
6.1
5
3.9
Very Much
#
%
83
35.5
107
61.8
77
46.1
92
48.4
99
60.7
80
62
Somewhat
#
%
92
39.3
56
32.4
64
38.3
87
45.8
49
30.1
40
31
Very Little
#
%
12
5.1
3
1.7
10
6
10
5.3
4
2.5
2
1.6
Not At All
#
%
17
7.3
3
1.7
2
1.2
.
.
1
0.6
2
1.6
C1b - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge
Related to: Listening Skills?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
24
10.3
4
2.3
15
9
1
0.5
9
5.5
6
4.7
Very Much
#
%
89
38
103
59.5
78
46.7
105
55.3
106
65
82
63.6
Somewhat
#
%
96
41
56
32.4
65
38.9
74
38.9
42
25.8
37
28.7
14
Very Little
#
%
11
4.7
8
4.6
7
4.2
7
3.7
5
3.1
2
1.6
Not At All
#
%
14
6
2
1.2
2
1.2
3
1.6
1
0.6
2
1.6
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
175
163
141
179
148
120
%
85.8
96.4
92.2
94.7
96.7
96.8
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
185
159
143
179
148
119
%
88.1
94.1
94.1
94.7
96.1
96.7
C1c - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge Related
to: Speaking Skills?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
16
6.8
6
3.5
14
8.4
1
0.5
12
7.4
5
3.9
Very Much
#
%
88
37.6
107
61.8
81
48.5
105
55.3
109
66.9
80
62
Somewhat
#
%
100
42.7
51
29.5
60
35.9
73
38.4
35
21.5
38
29.5
Very Little
#
%
18
7.7
8
4.6
10
6
9
4.7
5
3.1
5
3.9
Not At All
#
%
12
5.1
1
0.6
2
1.2
2
1.1
2
1.2
1
0.8
C1d - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge
Related to: Comprehension Skills?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
19
8.1
5
2.9
14
8.4
1
0.5
15
9.2
7
5.4
Very Much
#
%
88
37.6
110
63.6
76
45.5
100
52.6
99
60.7
76
58.9
Somewhat
#
%
102
43.6
50
28.9
65
38.9
76
40
44
27
42
32.6
15
Very Little
#
%
20
8.5
6
3.5
9
5.4
11
5.8
4
2.5
2
1.6
Not At All
#
%
5
2.1
2
1.2
3
1.8
2
1.1
1
0.6
2
1.6
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
188
158
141
178
144
118
%
86.2
94.6
92.2
94.2
95.4
95.2
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
190
160
141
176
143
118
%
88.4
95.2
92.2
93.1
96.6
96.7
C1e - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge Related
to: Using Mathematics Skills?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
15
6.4
7
4
14
8.4
3
1.6
13
8
5
3.9
Very Much
#
%
85
36.3
89
51.4
70
41.9
89
46.8
83
50.9
68
52.7
Somewhat
#
%
102
43.6
53
30.6
68
40.7
74
38.9
53
32.5
42
32.6
Very Little
#
%
24
10.3
15
8.7
12
7.2
21
11.1
10
6.1
13
10.1
Not At All
#
%
8
3.4
9
5.2
3
1.8
3
1.6
4
2.5
1
0.8
C1f - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge Related
to: Applying Scientific Method?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
14
6
9
5.2
16
9.6
7
3.7
12
7.4
10
7.8
Very Much
#
%
93
39.7
87
50.3
69
41.3
89
46.8
86
52.8
72
55.8
Somewhat
#
%
100
42.7
55
31.8
65
38.9
80
42.1
53
32.5
42
32.6
Very Little
#
%
21
9
18
10.4
14
8.4
11
5.8
8
4.9
4
3.1
Not At All
#
%
6
2.6
4
2.3
3
1.8
3
1.6
4
2.5
1
0.8
C1g - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge
Related to: Analytic Skills?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
14
6
9
5.2
17
10.2
3
1.6
15
9.2
6
4.7
Very Much
#
%
89
38
99
57.2
75
44.9
99
52.1
96
58.9
73
56.6
Somewhat
#
%
106
45.3
54
31.2
63
37.7
75
39.5
48
29.4
46
35.7
16
Very Little
#
%
19
8.1
9
5.2
10
6
12
6.3
2
1.2
3
2.3
Not At All
#
%
6
2.6
2
1.2
2
1.2
1
0.5
2
1.2
1
0.8
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
187
142
138
163
136
110
%
85.4
85.5
90.2
87.2
90.7
88.7
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
193
142
134
169
139
114
%
87.7
86.6
88.7
92.3
92.1
95.8
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
195
153
138
174
144
119
%
88.6
93.3
92
93
97.3
96.7
C1h - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge
Related to: Developing Computer Skills?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
11
4.7
5
2.9
14
8.4
1
0.5
14
8.6
8
6.2
Very Much
#
%
94
40.2
112
64.7
78
46.7
106
55.8
102
62.6
76
58.9
Somewhat
#
%
106
45.3
48
27.7
64
38.3
65
34.2
37
22.7
38
29.5
Very Little
#
%
19
8.1
5
2.9
7
4.2
16
8.4
9
5.5
4
3.1
Not At All
#
%
4
1.7
3
1.7
4
2.4
2
1.1
1
0.6
3
2.3
C1i - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge Related
to: Function as a Team Player?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
9
3.8
6
3.5
14
8.4
1
0.5
12
7.4
7
5.4
Very Much
#
%
98
41.9
99
57.2
77
46.1
113
59.5
103
63.2
84
65.1
Somewhat
#
%
102
43.6
59
34.1
61
36.5
64
33.7
42
25.8
36
27.9
17
Very Little
#
%
19
8.1
4
2.3
12
7.2
9
4.7
3
1.8
1
0.8
Not At All
#
%
6
2.6
5
2.9
3
1.8
3
1.6
3
1.8
1
0.8
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
200
160
142
171
139
114
%
89.7
95.2
92.8
90.5
93.3
94.2
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
200
158
138
177
145
120
%
88.9
94.6
90.2
93.7
96
98.4
C1j - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge Related
to: Work With People From Diverse Backgrounds?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
11
4.7
6
3.5
13
7.8
1
0.5
13
8
7
5.4
Very Much
#
%
93
39.7
109
63
78
46.7
113
59.5
109
66.9
87
67.4
Somewhat
#
%
104
44.4
46
26.6
63
37.7
66
34.7
32
19.6
32
24.8
Very Little
#
%
21
9
10
5.8
11
6.6
8
4.2
7
4.3
3
2.3
Not At All
#
%
5
2.1
2
1.2
2
1.2
2
1.1
2
1.2
.
.
C1k - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge
Related to: Acting on Ethical Principles?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
9
3.8
8
4.6
15
9
1
0.5
13
8
8
6.2
Very Much
#
%
104
44.4
96
55.5
80
47.9
102
53.7
100
61.3
80
62
Somewhat
#
%
98
41.9
59
34.1
61
36.5
77
40.5
44
27
36
27.9
18
Very Little
#
%
16
6.8
7
4
8
4.8
6
3.2
5
3.1
5
3.9
Not At All
#
%
7
3
3
1.7
3
1.8
4
2.1
1
0.6
.
.
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
197
155
141
179
141
119
%
88.3
92.8
91.6
94.7
94
97.5
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
202
155
141
179
144
116
%
89.8
93.9
92.8
94.7
96
95.9
C1l - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge Related
to: Appreciating Racial Equity?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
8
3.4
8
4.6
14
8.4
1
0.5
13
8
6
4.7
Very Much
#
%
97
41.5
104
60.1
78
46.7
105
55.3
108
66.3
86
66.7
Somewhat
#
%
97
41.5
46
26.6
60
35.9
75
39.5
36
22.1
32
24.8
Very Little
#
%
23
9.8
10
5.8
13
7.8
4
2.1
3
1.8
4
3.1
Not At All
#
%
9
3.8
5
2.9
2
1.2
5
2.6
3
1.8
1
0.8
C1m - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge
Related to: Appreciating Gender Equity?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
10
4.3
8
4.6
15
9
2
1.1
17
10.4
8
6.2
Very Much
#
%
96
41
98
56.6
79
47.3
100
52.6
97
59.5
83
64.3
Somewhat
#
%
96
41
53
30.6
58
34.7
75
39.5
42
25.8
34
26.4
Very Little
#
%
24
10.3
8
4.6
10
6
8
4.2
6
3.7
4
3.1
Not At All
#
%
8
3.4
6
3.5
5
3
5
2.6
1
0.6
.
.
C1n - To What Extent Did Your College Education Contribute to Your Knowledge
Related to: Personal Growth?
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Missing
#
%
18
7.7
8
4.6
19
11.4
1
0.5
18
11
9
7
Very Much
#
%
21
9
123
71.1
84
50.3
135
71.1
108
66.3
87
67.4
Somewhat
#
%
100
42.7
36
20.8
54
32.3
51
26.8
33
20.2
31
24
19
Very Little
#
%
77
32.9
5
2.9
7
4.2
2
1.1
3
1.8
1
0.8
Not At All
#
%
18
7.7
1
0.6
3
1.8
1
0.5
1
0.6
1
0.8
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
194
150
138
180
144
118
%
85.8
90.9
90.2
95.2
96
95.9
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
192
151
137
175
139
117
%
85.7
91.5
90.1
93.1
95.2
96.7
Very Much and
Somewhat
Combined
#
121
159
138
186
141
118
%
56
96.4
93.2
98.4
97.2
98.3
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
C2a - Did Your Major Include a
Co-op, Internship, Practicum,
Student Teaching, or Other Field
Experience?
No
Yes
#
%
#
%
81
36.2
143
63.8
55
33.1
111
66.9
41
32.3
86
67.7
59
31.1
131
68.9
37
25.2
110
74.8
35
30.2
81
69.8
Total
#
224
166
127
190
147
116
%
100
100
100
100
100
100
C2b - If Your Major Included Field Experience, Evaluate in Terms of
its Contribution to Your Growth
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Excellent
#
%
84
58.7
67
59.8
46
55.4
67
51.1
60
55.6
42
51.9
Good
#
51
39
33
55
43
34
Fair
%
35.7
34.8
39.8
42
39.8
42
20
#
4
5
3
6
3
4
Poor
%
2.8
4.5
3.6
4.6
2.8
4.9
#
4
1
1
3
2
1
%
2.8
0.9
1.2
2.3
1.9
1.2
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
135
106
79
122
103
76
%
94.4
94.6
95.2
93.1
95.4
93.8
Section D. Other Office That Serve You
Based on your last two years on this campus, how would you evaluate each of the following services? (If you have not had enough experience with a service to
evaluate it, please mark "Don't know/did not use," then skip to the next service.) For those services that require interaction with university offices or units
(secretaries, tutors, counselors, office workers, etc.), Please rate how responsive the staffs in those offices or units were to you need.
D1b - Office Evaluation: Registration (Service)
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
22
3
13
.
11
6
%
9.4
1.7
7.8
.
6.7
4.7
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
64
81
84
.
89
64
%
27.4
46.8
50.3
.
54.6
49.6
Do not
know/did not
use
#
%
1
0.4
.
.
.
.
4
2.1
5
3.1
1
0.8
Excellent
#
25
33
24
56
47
32
Good
%
10.7
19.1
14.4
29.5
28.8
24.8
#
87
70
88
90
71
50
%
37.2
40.5
52.7
47.4
43.6
38.8
Fair
#
70
49
35
32
22
26
Poor
%
29.9
28.3
21
16.8
13.5
20.2
D1c - Office Evaluation: Registration (Staff Responsiveness)
Do not
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1
0.4
20
8.5
58
24.8
62
26.5
.
.
18
10.4
35
20.2
29
16.8
.
.
12
7.2
43
25.7
21
12.6
4
2.1
46
24.2
106
55.8
27
14.2
5
3.1
12
7.4
39
23.9
13
8
1
0.8
17
13.2
28
21.7
10
7.8
21
Excellent and
Good Combined
#
29
18
7
8
7
14
%
12.4
10.4
4.2
4.2
4.3
10.9
%
53.1
60.6
72.7
78.5
80.3
67.2
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
29
10
7
7
5
9
#
112
103
112
146
118
82
%
12.4
5.8
4.2
3.7
3.1
7
#
78
53
55
152
51
45
%
46.2
57.6
66.3
81.7
73.9
70.3
D2b - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid (Service)
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
22
4
167
190
163
129
%
9.4
2.3
100
100
100
100
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
61
78
167
190
163
129
%
26.1
45.1
100
100
100
100
Do not
know/did not
use
#
%
7
3
4
2.3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Excellent
#
28
35
.
.
.
.
Good
%
12
20.2
.
.
.
.
#
88
63
.
.
.
.
%
37.6
36.4
.
.
.
.
Fair
#
62
46
.
.
.
.
%
26.5
26.6
.
.
.
.
D2c - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid (Staff Responsiveness)
Do not
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
8
3.4
23
9.8
64
27.4
50
21.4
4
2.3
19
11
34
19.7
29
16.8
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
22
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
27
21
.
.
.
.
%
11.5
12.1
.
.
.
.
%
56.6
59.4
.
.
.
.
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
28
9
.
.
.
.
#
116
98
0
0
0
0
%
12
5.2
.
.
.
.
#
87
53
0
0
0
0
%
52.7
58.2
.
.
.
.
D2ab - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid - Application (Service)
Bacc
II
Bacc
II
Bacc
II
ECSU
ECSU
ECSU
Service -Excellent and
Good
Combined
2002
2004
2006
2008
Don't know/did
not
use
#
%
2
1.3
14
7.4
6
3.9
4
3.4
Service -Excellent and
Good
Combined
2002
2004
2006
2008
D2ac - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid - Application (Staff Responsiveness)
Don't know/did
not
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
2
2.4
10
12.2
38
46.3
23
28
9
11
14
7.4
49
25.8
84
44.2
27
14.2
16
8.4
6
7.6
12
15.2
35
44.3
16
20.3
10
12.7
4
6.2
18
27.7
24
36.9
13
20
6
9.2
Service -Excellent and
Good
Combined
2002
2004
2006
2008
D2bb - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid - Disbursement (Service)
Don't know/did
not
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
4
2.7
22
14.8
74
49.7
37
24.8
12
8.1
16
8.4
44
23.2
69
36.3
44
23.2
17
8.9
6
3.9
45
29.4
56
36.6
33
21.6
13
8.5
4
3.3
37
30.8
42
35
23
19.2
14
11.7
Excellent
#
23
45
45
35
%
15.2
23.7
29.6
29.4
Good
#
79
77
59
39
23
%
52.3
40.5
38.8
32.8
Fair
#
36
37
30
33
Poor
%
23.8
19.5
19.7
27.7
#
11
17
12
8
%
7.3
8.9
7.9
6.7
#
102
122
104
74
#
48
133
47
42
#
96
113
101
79
%
68.5
69.3
71.2
64.3
%
60
75.6
64.4
68.9
%
66.2
64.9
68.7
68.1
Bacc
II
ECSU
2002
2004
2006
2008
D2bc - Office Evaluation: Financial Aid - Disbursement (Staff Responsiveness)
Don't know/did
not
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
4
4.8
11
13.3
35
42.2
26
31.3
7
8.4
16
8.4
54
28.4
77
40.5
25
13.2
18
9.5
6
7.8
11
14.3
34
44.2
17
22.1
9
11.7
4
6.2
20
30.8
26
40
10
15.4
5
7.7
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
19
4
20
.
11
8
%
8.1
2.3
12
.
6.7
6.2
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
48
58
71
.
69
54
%
20.5
33.5
42.5
.
42.3
41.9
D3b - Office Evaluation: Food Services (Service)
Do not
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
80
34.2
9
3.8
46
19.7
52
22.2
49
28.3
16
9.2
46
26.6
36
20.8
27
16.2
13
7.8
59
35.3
36
21.6
68
35.8
23
12.1
33
17.4
32
16.8
39
23.9
28
17.2
44
27
26
16
28
21.7
20
15.5
36
27.9
24
18.6
D3c - Office Evaluation: Food Services (Staff Responsiveness)
Do not
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
80
34.2
10
4.3
38
16.2
39
16.7
49
28.3
11
6.4
34
19.7
16
9.2
27
16.2
8
4.8
35
21
19
11.4
68
35.8
40
21.1
46
24.2
24
12.6
39
23.9
9
5.5
28
17.2
12
7.4
28
21.7
13
10.1
22
17.1
7
5.4
24
Staff -Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
46
131
45
46
Service -Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
28
22
12
34
15
13
%
12
12.7
7.2
17.9
9.2
10.1
#
55
62
72
56
72
56
%
40.7
51.7
60
45.9
63.7
60.2
Staff -- Excellent
and Good
Combined
Poor
#
19
5
7
12
6
5
%
58.2
75.3
63.4
75.4
%
8.1
2.9
4.2
6.3
3.7
3.9
#
48
45
43
86
37
35
%
45.3
68.2
62.3
70.5
67.3
74.5
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
15
4
23
.
11
9
%
6.4
2.3
13.8
.
6.7
7
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
58
61
77
.
71
56
%
24.8
35.3
46.1
.
43.6
43.4
D4b - Office Evaluation: Health Services (Service)
Do not
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
65
27.8
23
9.8
65
27.8
43
18.4
36
20.8
26
15
58
33.5
39
22.5
22
13.2
17
10.2
73
43.7
29
17.4
56
29.5
36
18.9
61
32.1
29
15.3
28
17.2
37
22.7
66
40.5
17
10.4
24
18.6
24
18.6
49
38
17
13.2
D4c - Office Evaluation: Health Services (Staff Responsiveness)
Do not
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
66
28.2
13
5.6
47
20.1
31
13.2
36
20.8
18
10.4
37
21.4
17
9.8
22
13.2
11
6.6
38
22.8
16
9.6
56
29.5
45
23.7
63
33.2
23
12.1
28
17.2
11
6.7
39
23.9
12
7.4
24
18.6
13
10.1
26
20.2
8
6.2
D5b - Office Evaluation: Counseling, Not Career (Service)
25
Service -Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
23
10
3
8
4
6
%
9.8
5.8
1.8
4.2
2.5
4.7
%
57.1
63.2
73.8
72.4
83.1
76
Staff -- Excellent
and Good
Combined
Poor
#
19
4
3
3
2
2
#
88
84
90
97
103
73
%
8.1
2.3
1.8
1.6
1.2
1.6
#
60
55
49
108
50
39
%
54.5
72.4
72.1
80.6
78.1
79.6
Service --
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
16
5
21
.
14
13
%
6.8
2.9
12.6
.
8.6
10.1
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
56
52
71
.
65
52
%
23.9
30.1
42.5
.
39.9
40.3
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
25
4
21
.
13
7
%
10.7
2.3
12.6
.
8
5.4
Do not
know/did not
use
#
%
105
44.9
66
38.2
42
25.1
94
49.5
46
28.2
36
27.9
Excellent
#
17
21
16
25
37
26
Good
%
7.3
12.1
9.6
13.2
22.7
20.2
#
53
46
61
48
49
35
%
22.6
26.6
36.5
25.3
30.1
27.1
Fair
#
31
25
23
16
12
15
%
13.2
14.5
13.8
8.4
7.4
11.6
D5c - Office Evaluation: Counseling, Not Career (Staff Responsiveness)
Do not
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
103
44
7
3
32
13.7
26
11.1
66
38.2
11
6.4
25
14.5
15
8.7
42
25.1
6
3.6
28
16.8
17
10.2
94
49.5
35
18.4
49
25.8
8
4.2
46
28.2
10
6.1
31
19
9
5.5
36
27.9
15
11.6
16
12.4
8
6.2
D6b - Office Evaluation: Business Services (Service)
Do not
know/did not
use
#
%
11
4.7
3
1.7
3
1.8
6
3.2
6
3.7
7
5.4
Excellent
#
48
46
25
59
51
41
Good
%
20.5
26.6
15
31.1
31.3
31.8
26
#
86
76
87
95
71
44
%
36.8
43.9
52.1
50
43.6
34.1
#
12
10
4
7
5
4
%
5.1
5.8
2.4
3.7
3.1
3.1
#
10
4
3
4
2
2
%
4.3
2.3
1.8
2.1
1.2
1.6
#
14
3
2
4
2
5
%
61.9
65.7
74
76
83.5
76.3
#
39
36
34
84
41
31
%
52
65.5
63
87.5
78.8
75.6
Service -Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
21.4
23.7
17.4
13.7
12.3
19.4
#
70
67
77
73
86
61
Staff -- Excellent
and Good
Combined
Poor
Fair
#
50
41
29
26
20
25
Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
6
1.7
1.2
2.1
1.2
3.9
#
134
122
112
154
122
85
%
67.7
73.5
78.3
83.7
84.7
73.9
D6c - Office Evaluation: Business Services (Staff Responsiveness)
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
79
83
90
.
86
61
%
33.8
48
53.9
.
52.8
47.3
Do not
know/did not
use
#
%
14
6
3
1.7
3
1.8
6
3.2
6
3.7
7
5.4
Excellent
#
27
20
12
61
14
23
Good
%
11.5
11.6
7.2
32.1
8.6
17.8
#
54
36
44
91
44
24
%
23.1
20.8
26.3
47.9
27
18.6
Fair
#
40
27
15
27
11
12
Staff -- Excellent
and Good
Combined
Poor
%
17.1
15.6
9
14.2
6.7
9.3
#
20
4
3
5
2
2
%
8.5
2.3
1.8
2.6
1.2
1.6
D7b - Office Evaluation: Residence Life (Service)
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
21
4
20
.
13
10
%
9
2.3
12
.
8
7.8
Do not
know/did not
use
#
%
83
35.5
53
30.6
34
20.4
75
39.5
38
23.3
28
21.7
Excellent
#
18
22
12
22
43
34
Good
%
7.7
12.7
7.2
11.6
26.4
26.4
27
#
58
51
66
53
54
37
%
24.8
29.5
39.5
27.9
33.1
28.7
Fair
#
37
28
31
28
13
14
#
17
15
4
12
2
6
%
57.4
64.4
75.7
82.6
81.7
77
Service -Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
%
15.8
16.2
18.6
14.7
8
10.9
#
81
56
56
152
58
47
%
7.3
8.7
2.4
6.3
1.2
4.7
#
76
73
78
75
97
71
%
58.5
62.9
69
65.2
86.6
78
Missing
Bacc
II
Bacc
II
ECSU
ECSU
%
22.2
31.8
44.3
.
42.9
44.2
D7c - Office Evaluation: Residence Life (Staff Responsiveness)
Do not
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
83
35.5
10
4.3
39
16.7
32
13.7
53
30.6
11
6.4
29
16.8
14
8.1
34
20.4
8
4.8
29
17.4
17
10.2
75
39.5
30
15.8
57
30
22
11.6
38
23.3
12
7.4
33
20.2
9
5.5
28
21.7
18
14
19
14.7
5
3.9
Poor
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
52
55
74
.
70
57
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
D8b - Office Evaluation: Opportunities to Participate in Campus Recreational Activities (Service)
Do not
Missing
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
21
9
50
21.4
37
15.8
75
32.1
42
17.9
9
3
1.7
32
18.5
44
25.4
55
31.8
33
19.1
6
22
13.2
20
12
23
13.8
75
44.9
24
14.4
3
.
.
50
26.3
47
24.7
71
37.4
16
8.4
6
14
8.6
26
16
56
34.4
56
34.4
9
5.5
2
11
8.5
20
15.5
40
31
43
33.3
14
10.9
1
28
Staff -- Excellent
and Good
Combined
#
18
11
5
6
1
2
%
7.7
6.4
3
3.2
0.6
1.6
#
49
40
37
87
45
37
%
49.5
61.5
62.7
75.7
81.8
84.1
Service -Excellent and
Good Combined
%
3.8
3.5
1.8
3.2
1.2
0.8
#
112
99
98
118
112
83
%
68.7
71.7
78.4
84.3
91.1
84.7
Bacc
II
Bacc
II
ECSU
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
D9b - Office Evaluation: Opportunities to Participate in Community Service Projects (Service)
Do not
Missing
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
25
10.7
53
22.6
40
17.1
59
25.2
42
17.9
15
3
1.7
36
20.8
43
24.9
55
31.8
27
15.6
9
24
14.4
23
13.8
21
12.6
69
41.3
25
15
5
.
.
51
26.8
40
21.1
75
39.5
18
9.5
6
13
8
27
16.6
52
31.9
54
33.1
14
8.6
3
108
83.7
21
16.3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
D10b - Office Evaluation: Opportunities to Develop Leadership Skills (Service)
Do not
Missing
know/did not
Excellent
Good
Fair
use
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
26
11.1
28
12
50
21.4
90
38.5
35
15
3
1.7
21
12.1
61
35.3
61
35.3
23
13.3
26
15.6
12
7.2
32
19.2
72
43.1
22
13.2
.
.
31
16.3
58
30.5
80
42.1
16
8.4
18
11
15
9.2
57
35
60
36.8
11
6.7
129
100
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
29
Service -Excellent and
Good Combined
%
6.4
5.2
3
3.2
1.8
.
%
63.5
73.1
75
82.7
86.2
.
Service -Excellent and
Good Combined
Poor
#
5
4
3
5
2
.
#
99
98
90
115
106
0
%
2.1
2.3
1.8
2.6
1.2
.
#
140
122
104
138
117
0
%
77.8
81.9
80.6
86.8
90
.
Section E. You Conclusions
E1 - All Things Considered, How Would You Characterize the Intellectual Environment on
This Campus? (Old Question)*
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
Very Strong
#
%
13
5.8
18
10.7
Strong
#
50
58
%
22.1
34.3
Average
#
%
134
59.3
79
46.7
Weak
#
19
9
%
8.4
5.3
Very Weak
#
%
10
4.4
5
3
Bacc
II
ECSU
2002
2004
2006
Strong
#
87
129
102
Weak
%
72.5
67.9
68.5
#
20
31
22
Very Weak
#
%
.
.
5
2.6
1
0.7
%
16.7
16.3
14.8
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
7
4
41
.
13
23
%
3
2.3
24.6
.
8
17.8
Excellent
#
76
59
39
87
68
53
%
32.5
34.1
23.4
45.8
41.7
41.1
Good
#
117
92
75
81
74
34
30
%
50
53.2
44.9
42.6
45.4
26.4
Fair
#
31
16
12
21
8
17
%
83.3
81.1
84.6
%
1.3
1.2
.
0.5
.
1.6
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
193
85
151
89.3
114
90.5
168
88.4
142
94.7
87
82.1
Poor
%
13.2
9.2
7.2
11.1
4.9
13.2
#
3
2
.
1
.
2
%
29.2
46.3
#
100
154
126
E2a - How Would You Evaluate the Quality of Instruction in Your Major?
Missing
#
63
76
(New) Very
Strong and
Strong
Combined
E1 - All Things Considered, How Would You Characterize the
Intellectual Environment on This Campus? (New Question)*
Very Strong
#
%
13
10.8
25
13.2
24
16.1
(Old) Very
Strong and
Strong
Combined
%
1.3
1.2
0.6
0.5
0.6
.
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
166
79.8
135
83.3
108
85
163
85.8
133
88.7
0
.
%
1.7
0.6
.
0.5
.
2.3
Excellent and
Good
Combined
#
%
181
80.8
151
89.3
106
87.6
163
85.8
131
88.5
101
82.1
E2b - How Would You Evaluate the Quality of Instruction Overall?
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
#
26
11
40
.
13
129
%
11.1
6.4
24
.
8
100
Excellent
#
28
34
26
64
52
.
%
12
19.7
15.6
33.7
31.9
.
Good
#
138
101
82
99
81
.
%
59
58.4
49.1
52.1
49.7
.
Fair
#
39
25
18
26
16
.
Poor
%
16.7
14.5
10.8
13.7
9.8
.
#
3
2
1
1
1
.
E3 - How Would You Evaluate the Overall Education You are Receiving?
Missing
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Bacc
II
#
10
4
46
.
15
6
ECSU
Excellent
%
17.5
30.6
15.6
33.2
35.6
24.8
Good
#
140
98
80
100
73
69
#
39
17
15
26
17
19
Poor
%
4.3
2.3
27.5
.
9.2
4.7
#
41
53
26
63
58
32
2002
2004
2006
2008
E4 - Would You Recommend This Institution to a
Friend?
No
Not sure
Yes
#
%
#
%
#
%
6
4.7
35
27.1
88
68.2
13
6.8
39
20.5
138
72.6
8
5.5
23
15.8
115
78.8
.
.
1
10
9
90
31
%
59.8
56.6
47.9
52.6
44.8
53.5
Fair
%
16.7
9.8
9
13.7
10.4
14.7
#
4
1
.
1
.
3
Total
#
129
190
146
10
%
100
100
100
100
Bacc
II
ECSU
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
E5 - If You Could Start Over Would You Choose to
Attend This Institution?
No
Not sure
Yes
36
16.7
59
27.4
120
55.8
26
15.4
50
29.6
93
55
10
7.6
50
37.9
72
54.5
37
19.5
46
24.2
107
56.3
20
13.7
25
17.1
101
69.2
.
.
2
14.3
12
85.7
Total
215
169
132
190
146
14
100
100
100
100
100
100
E6 - How Likely Would You Have Obtained Your Degree Had The OffCampus Program Not Been Available?
Bacc
II
ECSU
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Very Likely
#
%
26
24.1
23
22.8
65
34.2
31
32.3
47
37.9
Probably
#
%
53
49.1
59
58.4
89
46.8
50
52.1
67
54
32
Probably Not
#
%
15
13.9
15
14.9
22
11.6
9
9.4
9
7.3
Not Likely
#
%
14
13
4
4
14
7.4
6
6.3
1
0.8
Total
#
108
101
190
96
124
%
100
100
100
100
100
Section F. Your Plans for Next Year
F1 - Your Plans for Next Year
01
Don’t know
yet
Bacc
II
ECSU
02
Have
accepted a
job
03
Continue in
current
position
04
Grad school
fulltime
05
Grad school
p-t, work p-t
06
More
undergrad
courses
07
Still seeking
employment
08
Won’t work
or attend
school
09
Military
service
10
Other
Total
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
1998
15
6.6
40
17.5
1
0.4
41
18
15
6.6
6
2.6
93
40.8
.
.
7
3.1
10
4.4
228
100
2000
20
11.8
16
9.5
7
4.1
29
17.2
21
12.4
3
1.8
59
34.9
7
4.1
3
1.8
4
2.4
169
100
2002
24
17.6
24
17.6
6
4.4
20
14.7
22
16.2
.
.
32
23.5
2
1.5
.
.
6
4.4
136
100
2004
28
14.7
18
9.5
15
7.9
23
12.1
34
17.9
4
2.1
53
27.9
4
2.1
2
1.1
9
4.7
190
100
2006
20
13.6
28
19
2
1.4
25
17
19
12.9
3
2
43
29.3
1
0.7
2
1.4
4
2.7
147
100
2008
.
.
8
100
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
100
33