Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
Summary of Consultation Letters Regarding Tuition and Fees, FY2014 (Updated 5/24/13)
College/University
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Neutral
Alexandria Technical and Community College
X
Anoka-Ramsey Community College
Cambridge
Coon Rapids
X
X
Anoka Technical College
X
Bemidji State University
X
Central Lakes College
Brainerd
Staples
Century College
X
X
X
Dakota County Technical College
X
Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College
X
Hennepin Technical College
Brooklyn Park
Eden Prairie
X
X
Inver Hills Community College
X
Lake Superior College
X
Metropolitan State University
X
Minneapolis Community and Technical College
X
Minnesota State College - Southeast Technical
Red Wing
Winona
X
X
Minnesota State Community and Technical College
Detroit Lakes
Fergus Falls
Moorhead
Wadena
X
X
X
X
Minnesota State University, Mankato
X
Minnesota State University Moorhead
X
Minnesota West Community and Technical College:
Canby
Granite Falls
Jackson
Luverne
Pipestone
Worthington
X
X
X
X
Normandale Community College
X
Northeast Higher Education District:
Hibbing Community College
Itasca Community College
Mesabi Range Community and Technical College
Rainy River Community College
X
X
X
X
X
X
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
Summary of Consultation Letters Regarding Tuition and Fees, FY2014 (Updated 5/24/13)
College/University
Vermilion Community College
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Neutral
X
North Hennepin Community College
X
Northland Community and Technical College:
East Grand Forks
Thief River Falls
X
Northwest Technical College
X
Pine Technical College
X
X
Ridgewater College:
Hutchinson
Willmar
X
X
Albert Lea
Austin
Owatonna
X
X
X
Riverland Community College:
Rochester Community and Technical College
X
St. Cloud State University
X
St. Cloud Technical and Community College
X
Saint Paul College
X
South Central College:
Faribault
North Mankato
X
X
Southwest Minnesota State University
X
Winona State University
X
April 24, 2013
Chancellor Steven J. Rosenstone and Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 7th Street E.
Suite 350
St. Paul, MN 55101-7804
Chancellor Rosenstone and Trustees:
As requested by MnSCU’s student consultation policy, this letter will outline the tuition consultation process
that took place at Anoka Technical College during the spring 2013 semester.
The tuition consultation process that took place this year was neither satisfactory nor unsatisfactory. Our Chief
Financial Officer met with our Student Senate on January 23rd, February 20th, and April 17th. During each of
these consultations the CFO brought information regarding the various percentage rate increases we could
possibly see (starting at the 3% increase). On the information that was provided to us, there were several
discrepancies due to the fact that several items were listed as “Coon Rapids.” When we asked them about why
certain items were listed as Coon Rapids, we were told that the same template is used for all three campuses
within the alignment.
At our final consultation on April 17th, several students could see the need for a 3% increase in tuition as
Anoka Technical College is still in the red, and will continue to spiral downward if we didn’t approve the
increase. After a majority vote we do approve the 3% increase, however, next year we plan on starting the
tuition consultation process earlier in the year, and getting as much information as possible so that we can
make the best decision for the students.
As a senate we agreed on the 3% increase for tuition, and after our meeting with the CFO on the 17th, I
received an e-mail from them informing me that there will be a “$.75 reduction in Anoka Technical College’s
parking fee in order to offset the tuition increase.” As this was not brought up in the tuition consultation, I am
not approving the reduction in the parking fee because our entire senate was not made aware of this. Also, in
order to have a better tuition consultation for the years to come, I will be asking our CFO to continue tuition
consultation over the remainder of the semester.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions in regards to the tuition consultation process that took place
at Anoka Technical College. The students recognize the need for the 3% increase to tuition, and recognize the
need to begin the process earlier on in the year to obtain better information.
Sincerely,
Kerrie Maleski
Student Senate President
Anoka Technical College
kmaleski1@my.anokatech.edu
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East Seventh Street
St. Paul MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone and Trustees:
This letter is in response and in accordance to the MnSCU student consultation policy (Board
policy 2.3). Within this letter we have outlined the tuition consultation process that has been
taking place at Central Lakes College Brainerd Campus.
Since the start of the 2012-2013 academic year, Vice President of Administrative Services Kari
Christiansen, Director of Business Services Christina Vopatek, and Dean of Students Beth
Adams have been working with the Executive Officers of the Student Senate at both Brainerd
and Staples campus to discuss proposed tuition, fee, and expenditure levels for fiscal year 2014.
On November 22nd, Mrs. Christiansen first presented historical trends of the college budget as a
way to educate the entire executive board about the budget process and changes that have
occurred over the past few years. On April 24th, the Executive Officers for Brainerd Campus and
I did a presentation to the entire Student Senate about the historical trends of tuition, fees, and
enrollment levels of the college for the last few years. Furthermore, the Student Senate received
a presentation regarding the procedure of how college operations are funded and the importance
of student consultation throughout the budget process at this meeting as well. The final
consultation meeting was held on April 17th with Brainerd Senate Executive Officers, Mrs.
Christiansen, and Director of Student Life Erich Heppner. The Student Life Committee met on
the following dates February 28th, March 7th, March 18th, and April 4th. Lastly, the Technology
Fee Committee meetings occurred on March 19th and April 9th.
On April 24th, the Executive Board provided a presentation to the Brainerd Student Senate about
the information presented in earlier meetings. A formal recommendation was drafted and
unanimously approved by the Brainerd Student Senate on April 24th. After surveying the Senate,
they felt that the information was explained well and that they understood the budget process to
make an informed decision when the vote was held for FY14 budget recommendations.
We are advocating for a 3% maximum increase for FY14, regardless of underlying conditions
and circumstances, such as reduction in state appropriation. The Student Senate also voted to
approve the following budget recommendations for FY2012:
FY2014Fee
Tuition
Technology Fee
Student Life Fee
Health Services Fee
Parking Fee
Change
3%
no change
no change
no change
no change
FY2014 Proposed Rate
$163.87/credit
$10.00/credit
$7.25/credit
$0.60/credit
$2.50/credit
The Senate appreciates Kari Christiansen, Vice President of Administrative Services, and all of
the administrative staff for their exceptional and outstanding support of the students, who are
actively involved in discussion of the tuition increase. Through their dedication the Senate has
been well advised this year and has been able to make an informed decision. The executive board
from the Central Lakes College Brainerd Student Senate would like to thank you for taking the
time to read and consider our position.
Sincerely,
Rachel Bartosh – President
Shay Samuelson – Vice President
Anna Backberg – Secretary
Nick Bielinski – Publicist
Josh Morris – Treasurer
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East Seventh Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Steven J. Rosenstone and Trustees:
This letter is in regards to MnSCU Student Consultation Policy (Board policy
2.3). Central Lakes College’s Student Senate, Staff, Faculty, and Administration
have been actively engaged in discussions concerning budgets and other
financial issues. We wish to bring your attention to our position on tuition
increase and our current fees.
The Staples Student Senate is advocating a maximum increase of 3%. We
approve keeping online tuition at $189.10 per credit. Currently, our students
pay an estimated 60% of tuition and fees, while the Minnesota government
pays an estimated 40%. Although we accept this, we feel the amount students
pay should be lowered in the near future. Student Senate also voted to approve
the following budget recommendations for:
FY2012Fee
Tuition
Online Tuition
Technology Fee
Student Life Fee
Health Services Fee
Parking Fee
MSCSA Fee
Change
3%
no change
no change
no change
no change
no change
no change
FY2012 Proposed Rate
$163.87/credit
$189.10/credit
$10.00/credit
$7.25/credit
$0.60/credit
$2.50/credit
$0.31/ credit
The Staples Student Senate appreciates Kari Christiansen, Vice President of
Administrative Services, for her exceptional and outstanding support of the
students, who are actively involved in discussion of the tuition increase.
Through Kari’s dedication the Senate has been well advised this year and has
been able to make an informed decision. The executive board from the Central
Lakes College Staples Student Senate would like to thank you for taking the
time to read and consider our position.
Sincerely,
Nick Weeks – President
Michael Bertram – Vice President
Anna Stevens – Secretary
Colby Abazs– Publicist
Matthew Ayers – Publicist
Michael Voss – Treasurer
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East Seventh Street
St. Paul MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone and Trustees:
As requested by MnSCU’s student consultation policy (Board policy 2.3), this letter will
outline the tuition consultation process that recently took place at Hennepin Technical
College’s Brooklyn Park Campus.
The campus administration approached our senate to schedule meetings to discuss
tuition starting in October of 2012. Due to scheduling conflicts we have successfully
held one meeting in February. The tuition consultation meeting was attended by
President Cecilia Cervantes and CFO Craig Erickson.
Background materials were provided for the consultation meeting. This included a
detailed spreadsheet on the administration’s tuition proposal and a document outlining
the reasons why the additional tuition was needed.
The Administration proposed a 3% tuition boost, and a $0.46 increase in the parking lot
fee. These were discussed with the student senate, and declined by the student senate.
We have witnessed budget cuts in all departments of the college, and question how an
increase in tuition will benefit our education.
If we had communicated better we may have reached an equitable agreement.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding
Hennepin Technical College Brooklyn Park Campus’s tuition consultation process.
Sincerely,
Michael Fliger
Student Senate President
Mfliger001@my.hennepintech.edu
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East Seventh Street
St. Paul MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone and Trustees:
As requested by MnSCU’s student consultation policy (Board policy 2.3), this
letter will outline the tuition consultation process that recently took place at
Hennepin Technical College-Eden Prairie campus.
The campus administration approached our senate president to schedule
meetings to discuss the college budget and March 25th was agreed upon. The
meeting was attended by President Cecilia Cervantes, CFO Craig Erickson and our
senate advisor. Our senate advisor then presented the information to our senate
president due to her being unable to attend the meeting at the last minute. On
May 8th, the same information was once again presented to me.
Background materials were provided. This included a detailed spreadsheet
illustrating the impact of the proposed tuition and fee increases.
The Administration proposed a 3% tuition boost, in addition to a 40¢ per-credit
increase in the parking fee.
The first consultation meeting was done early enough that it left sufficient time
for the full senate to be made aware of the proposal. This was, however,
neglected to be brought up to the full senate at no fault of the administration. As I
myself came into the process too late, I was not able to present this information
to the rest of the student senate either. Therefore, my following statements are
not necessarily the student’s view but simply what I think my senate’s opinions
and thoughts would have been.
I believe that the students would, at first, be very displeased with the idea of yet
another tuition increase. With the materials provided to us by administration,
students would have clearly seen that public funding of higher education has
decreased significantly in the past 10 years. As the college finances get strained,
tuition increases are almost to be expected unless the students would rather lose
certain services. Not all of our students take their vehicles to school either so I
believe that the parking fee would have faced an even fiercer opposition. One
look at our parking lots, however, would convince most students of the need for
this fee increase. My only request is that senate is kept updated with how repairs
and maintenance of the parking lots go throughout the year. I know that with the
parking fee increase, students would appreciate seeing the results as soon as
possible.
President Cervantes made herself available at any time for comments or
questions and members of her staff were very responsive to our questions. Even
with the difficulty administration faced in order to do this year’s budget
consultation, I feel that student views were factored into the tuition plan and felt
that the consultation process was taken seriously by both parties.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding
Hennepin Technical College-Eden Prairie’s tuition consultation process. Thank
you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Micah Pilien
Student Senate President-Elect
gpilien001@my.hennepintech.edu
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East Seventh Street
St. Paul MN 55101
Chairman Hightower, and Board of Trustees,
My name is Brian Liebeg, I am the Student Senate President at Inver Hills Community College, and I am writing
this letter about the tuition consultation process on behalf of the student body. We feel that the process was informative
and satisfactory. The campus Chief Financial Officer Dee Bernard was very accessible during the process to explain
various aspects of the budgeting process to us.
Our meeting during the Fall semester (September 20th) was a preliminary view as to factors that would determine
which direction the budget will go. She informed us that they were, at the time, expecting an appropriation cut. She also
laid out historical information about the last couple of years of funding from the State. The information included: last
year, all MnSCU schools received a 10% funding cut, the State Legislature previously put a 4% tuition cap on two year
institutions and a 5% cap on four year institutions. Additionally, she told us that renovations were planned for the first
floor of our Library building, and first floor of our College Center building, scheduled to start in May.
On January 30th, Dee spoke to our Senate informing us more of how the overall funding process works. A large
percentage of our Senate body consisted of new members at the beginning of the Spring semester. She and I agreed that a
more “overview”-oriented presentation was warranted. She explained how appropriations make their way to MnSCU, and
to our campus. She also explained that over the last several years, funding from the State has steadily declined.
During our meetings on March 7th and March 21st, Dee presented the improved budget outlook which hinged on
an improved budget outlook for the State. She stated that as the Legislature was updating their forecasts, the school was
adjusting our budgets to account for them. She stated that there were no planned cuts in the budget for FY2014, however
the budget for the following year was going to fall short according to their projections. She also stated that the working
budget for FY2014 was built upon certain assumptions: Staff\Faculty salaries were to increase once contracts were
approved in the State. Another assumption looked at was enrollment, and that enrollment is likely to decrease over the
next year; this would reduce the revenue going into the college.
Overall, the process went well, and the Senate was pleased with the process. Dee was very open to questions and
feedback, and was often mentioning that she’d love to return to speak to the Senate if there were further questions or
concerns. Dee also made it clear that any student could email her directly with questions, comments or concerns about the
budget, or the appropriation process.
The Senate approved a 3% tuition increase for next year. We dislike that tuition had to increase at all, however,
we understand that for future budgetary health, it is necessary. The information provided to us explained where the
funding provided by the tuition increase would go.
If there are any questions, comments or concerns from Chairman Hightower, the Board of Trustees, or any other
involved party, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Brian Liebeg, Student Senate President
sspresident@inverhills.edu
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East Seventh Street
St. Paul, MN
April 24th, 2013
Dear Chancellor Rosenstone and Trustees,
As requested by MnSCU’s student consultation policy 2.3, I am writing you this letter to inform you how
the tuition and budget consultation process occurred here at Lake Superior College during the 2012-13
academic year.
President Johns and Vice-President Finlayson met with the Student Senate on multiple occasions
throughout the year. The administration took an early and often approach to consultation. Early on in
the process, when it was difficult to make projections for us, President Johns and Vice-President
Finlayson did their best to inform us how the process works, and what the situation was like in the
legislature and on campus at each point in time that we met. Our students were well informed.
When they were able to make initial projections, our administration gave us two different scenarios. The
first was what the budget would look like with a $145 tuition increase (As per MnSCU’s request). The
second was what the budget would look like with an increase of zero dollars.
The final consultation occurred today, April 24th. In our meeting today, President Johns and VicePresident Finlayson proposed a tuition increase of $144.90. When asked by students how they balanced
the budget with that proposal, they responded that department heads came to them with funding
requests, and they made cuts in those requests along with the $144.90 increase in tuition. The
administration will also be raising the student life fee, as approved by the student life committee.
The Administration based their proposal on the State Senate’s funding bill, the contract settlements, and
a projection of flat enrollment for the next fiscal year.
Upon serious deliberation, the Student Senate decided to support the increase requested by our
administration. We discussed the repercussions of the increase, as well as the repercussions of a
smaller, or zero percent increase. The senate came to the conclusion that further cuts which would have
to be made without an increase in tuition would harm the quality of education provided to our students,
and that the modest increase in tuition was a better choice. In making our decision, the Student Senate
also discussed the recent history of tuition increases precipitated by the decrease in support from the
state legislature.
The forthcoming and transparent approach our administration has taken in this process, has built a level
of trust between administration and students that was instrumental in our decision to support the
increase. Ultimately our Student Senators felt confident that our administration was doing all that it
could to keep tuition as low as possible, while maintaining an excellent quality of education. As such, we
decided that the proposed budget was in our best interest.
If you have any questions or concerns about the process I’ve outlined above, feel free to contact me at
any time. Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Kyle Vanderflute
President, Lake Superior College Student Senate
Kyvander2055@student.lsc.edu
(218-750-3566)
Student Senate of Metropolitan State University
New Main L207
700 East Seventh Street
Student.Senate@metrostate.edu
St Paul, MN 55106
senate.metrostate.edu
April 17, 2013
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing on behalf of the Student Senate of Metropolitan State University in reluctant
support of the recommended tuition increase of 2.75%, and with great appreciation for the
consultation process followed by Metropolitan State University’s financial team led by Chief
Financial Officer Murtuza Siddiqui.
Additionally, our students would be remiss to not acknowledge the challenge of meeting
the debt obligation that the average graduating student accumulates during his or her tenure.
University graduates deserve to enter the workforce confident in their ability to secure work that
will not only allow them to live, but also repay the debt they have incurred. The Student Senate
understands, -and is sympathetic to, the growing financial needs of the University.
Accessible and affordable education is a strong Minnesota value, creating a workforce
that attracts many of the nation’s best employers. Our hope is that those reading this letter will
continue to be proponents for affordable higher education by continuing to carry that value
forward, and find solutions that turn the curve on the levels of debt being carried by the students
of this and other universities as we fear a crisis is eminent. Thank you for your time and
consideration.
Most sincerely,
Christopher X. Nguyen | President, Student Senate
Metropolitan State University
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East Seventh St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
April 22, 2013
Chair Hightower and Trustees,
This letter, as requested by the MnSCU student consultation policy, is an outline of the
budget consultation that college CFO Pat Nordick recently presented at M | State – Wadena
campus on March 6, 2013 and also earlier in the fall. Members attending the Fall 2012 budget
meeting included Student Government Association Advisor Suzanne Rethemeier and the Student
Government Association President, as there was not a functioning full Student Government
Association during the fall semester. The attendees of the March 6, 2013 included Student
Government Association Advisor Suzanne Rethemeier, executive board members and senators
of the Student Government Association.
Brief background materials were presented on the budget of the college to the members
in attendance. These materials described in detail the proposed 3% tuition increase to our
colleges, a freeze in tuition, and detailed effects of the Governor’s budget for the college.
Both of these meetings provided the Student Government Association with proper time to
have discussions on the information presented and make well-informed decisions.
With sufficient time to discuss the information presented, the Student Government
Association agreed with the proposed increase of tuition because of the benefits it will have on
our college’s budget in the future.
Students and attendees of the meetings were welcomed to contact Pat Nordick with any
questions, concerns, or comments at any time by e-mail.
The Student Government Association members appreciate the time that was given to
make an approving assessment of the budget for the following school years.
Sincerely,
Natalie Tupy
M | State – Wadena Student Government Association President
Natalie_Tupy@my.minnesota.edu
Dear Board of Trustees,
This letter is written on behalf of the Minnesota State University Moorhead Student Senate.
Student Senate appreciates the opportunity to write this letter which is in accordance with MnSCU
student consultation policy (Board Policy 2.3). Senators agree that the student consultation process with
school administrators was very extensive. Student Senate supports a 3% tuition increase for FY2014.
This year, the consultation process between administrators and students greatly improved.
Administrators communicate with Meet and Confer, a process in which they meet with every bargaining
unit once a month on the same day. This year, Student Senate was included as a bargaining unit. Dates
of Meet and Confer were 9/13, 8/18, 11/29, 12/13, 1/17, 2/28, 3/28, and 4/24. At the end of March,
Student Senate formed a Tuition Team designed to ask questions to administrators on the proposed
tuition increase and gather feedback from the Student Senate week by week. The process followed a
timeline designed by Student Senate and agreed upon by the administration. This was the timeline:
Timeline for Tuition Discussions:
1) March 28th: Meet and Confer: Tuition team updates Student Senate on our Timeline for Tuition
Discussions.
2) April 3rd @ 11am: First tuition team meeting with administration.
3) April 4th @ 5pm: Tuition team shares information with Student Senate and gathers feedback.
4) April 10th @ 11am: Second tuition team meeting with administration.
5) April 11th @ 5pm: Tuition team shares information with Student Senate and gathers feedback.
6) April 17th @ 11am: Tuition team debriefs on process and formulates any final questions.
7) April 24th @ 5pm: Meet and Confer: Administration answers any final questions and Student Senate
forms recommendation.
8) April 24th-25th: The president of Student Senate drafts consultation letter for the chancellor.
Due to lack of state investment and decrease in student enrollment, tuition at MSUM must rise
3% in order to sustain excellence in our academic programs. Administrators have discussed many
enrollment strategies to increase retention and student population at MSUM. Student Senate hopes to
continue the strong relationship with administrators by participating in the development of future
enrollment strategies. By increasing enrollment and continuing to advocate state legislators, Student
Senate hopes that tuition rises will cede and the great burden of student debt will end.
Sincerely,
Russel Ferguson
Student Senate President
Minnesota State University Moorhead
April 22, 2013
Dr. Shrubb,
On behalf of the entire student body I would like to thank you, Diana Fliss and
Lori Voss for coming to our campus to discuss tuition consultation. The response I
received from other students tells me everyone was well informed and appreciated the
effort you and many others took to put the presentation together. This presentation helped
us as students see why the proposed tuition increase is needed to help our school.
We realize that because of an expected drop in enrollment this tuition increase is
necessary but a concern we had as students is being able to raise enrollment numbers
when, even without this increase, we at Minnesota West pay one of the highest tuitions in
the state for two year colleges and technical schools. We would like to urge our
administration to look towards other avenues in the future besides raising tuition but as
for now, we see the need for the increase.
Again, thank you, and the rest of the administration, for all of your hard work
towards this issue.
Jessica Swalve
MN West Jackson Campus
Student Senate President
jessica.swalve@live.mnwest.edu
April 24, 2013
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing to inform you that as requested by MnSCU’s student consultation policy (Board policy 2.3),
the student body at Minnesota West Community and Technical College- Pipestone campus have been
informed and involved with the proposed college budget for the fiscal year of 2014.
The tuition consultation was held on Tuesday, February 26th, and was attended by the student body,
faculty and staff, Diana Fliss, President Dr. Richard Shrubb, and Provost Dr. Jeff Williamson. Lunch was
provided by the student senate for those in attendance. Diana Fliss presented a detailed powerpoint
which included financial health and planning, enrollment and allocation history, FY14 projections, and
the current tuition rate as well as the proposed tuition increase of 2.8% and the changes that would
make in student tuition. After Diana Fliss presented the powerpoint the floor was opened for the
student body to ask questions of Dr. Richard Shrubb. All questions were answered thoroughly.
The powerpoint presented was a sufficient way to inform the students about the proposed budget and
increase for the FY14. The student senate feels that the consultation process was taken seriously by
both the student body and administration. However, one way the consultation process could be
improved is to plan a day when more students are on campus. If unable to find a day that works,
planning to come a second day to involve the students that were unable to come would be an excellent
idea. This would allow the students who were unable to attend to also become involved, as well as
allowing for those who may have thought of more questions after the first presentation to ask and
receive answers at the second presentation.
We, the student senate, appreciate the effort put forth by Dr. Richard Shrubb, Diana Fliss, and Dr. Jeff
Williamson and the time spent involving and explaining to the student body on the effects the proposed
tuition raise will have on us as students.
Please feel free to contact me on any questions or comments you may have regarding the Minnesota
West Community and Technical College- Pipestone campus tuition consultation process. Thank you for
your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Michaela Miller
Student Senate President
Michaela.Miller@live.mnwest.edu
April 24th 2013
Greg Ewig
Minnesota State Colleges & Universities
350 Wells Fargo Place 30 E. 7th Street
St.Paul, MN 5510-4946
Dear Mr. Ewig,
It is a great honor and privilege to write this letter outlining the tuition consultation process which took place on the Normandale
campus over the past year. The process followed in accordance with MnSCU’s Board policy 2.3.
Since early fall 2012 I have had the pleasure of meeting with both the Vice President of Finance and Operations, Ed Wines and the
College President, Joe Opatz . Since the beginning of the consultation process back in October, the Normandale Student Senate has
had open communication with both Joe and Ed regarding the budgeting process. In all, there have been a total of four budget
presentations given to the Student Senate, two each semester; students have provided feedback, asked questions and have been fully
engaged throughout the whole process.
In addition to the budget presentations, I have been meeting with President Opatz and Vice President Wines on a monthly basis to
discuss issues facing students and the collective Normandale campus. Throughout out the entire year the Senate has worked actively
on projects and initiatives that have positively affected the Normandale Campus. Over the past summer, I, along with my fellow
Senators were active participants in the design process of the new Partnership Building, we have been vocal in the shared services
project to combine the bookstore operations of the metro colleges and played an integral role in the launch of the Tap Walk map
application.
In the final budget presentation given on April 9 th, President Opatz recommended a three percent increase in the tuition rate with no
increases on fees; for a student taking a 30 credit course load per year, their tuition will increase from $5,649 to $5,838.90. Enrollment
for FY14 is projected to be 7,100, which is the same as FY13.
After months of consultation and discussion with Normandale Administration, the Student Senate has decided to neither endorse nor
oppose the proposed tuition increase. We do this not out of indecisiveness, but rather because we feel there needs to be a balanced
approach to countering the rising cost of education in the state. The relentless increases in tuition year after year are slowly pricing
students out of an education, during a time when our economy is calling for a “highly skilled and educated workforce.” More than half
of the students at Normandale are part-time; they have turned to our college and many other two-year institutions around the state
because it is an affordable solution to getting their education, yet Minnesota public two-year students pay the third highest tuition and
fees in the country and costs continue to rise.
If Normandale or any other college in this state will continue to produce future leaders, something must be done to make college
affordable; all of our futures hinge on this.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding Normandale’s consultation process or anything else I
have mentioned in this letter. Thank you for your consideration.
Cordially,
Nick Schneider
Student Senate President
Normandale Community College
Nick.Schneider@normandale.edu
(952) 288-6403
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Dear Chancellor Rosenstone,
I am writing this letter to tell you of my experience with tuition consultation this year at
our campus. I attend Itasca Community College (ICC). I can say with great pride that our
consultation this year was excellent and very informative. The Student Senate here at ICC has
been more active this year than it has been in a very long time. We had a strong group of student
leaders attend the consultations. Some students were very new and very confused, however our
Director of Finance made the process simple and welcoming. The students asked many questions
and were clarified with clear, intelligent responses. We, the Itasca Community College Student
Senate, have taken a unanimous vote in favor of the tuition increase proposed.
The Director of Finance, Patricia Leistikow, met with the Student Senate and other
students three times throughout the year. She met with us on December 4th, 2012, February 26th,
2013, and April 16th, 2013. These meetings were more than enough for the students to
understand what was being proposed and to formulate an opinion on it. We discussed every
detail of what the school would be spending, and every possible outcome of tuition increases. At
first, we were planning on seeing a 3% increase, which is something we supported. However, at
the last meeting we were informed that the increase would instead be $145.00. After Patricia
explained to us that this is still basically a 3% increase, we decided to vote on the proposal. The
Student Senate unanimously approves of the tuition increase proposal and of all planned
expenses for the upcoming year. Everything was explained to us very thoroughly and we were
given very helpful spreadsheets, with important areas highlighted. We felt the consultation was
very effective because Patricia took her time, was in no hurry, and willingly answered every
question we put forth to her.
As previously stated, the ICC Student Senate has approved the proposal for next year. We
feel the increase to tuition is reasonable, as well as the expenses put forth. We realize that in the
next few years, ICC will be spending a lot on construction, as we are completely rebuilding one
of our biggest halls. This is in compete benefit to the students, so we support this renovation.
There will also be a new stoplight, which will surely help keep our students safe. Thank you for
your time Chancellor.
Sincerely,
Kayley Schoonmaker, President
Itasca Community College Student Senate
Ua2733ys@students.itascacc.edu (218) 398-4205
To the Board of Trustees:
We are writing this letter as requested by MnSCU’s student consultation policy on behalf of both
the Eveleth and Virginia campuses of Mesabi Range Community and Technical College.
We held our consultation meetings November 30, February 28, and April 15. Interim Provost Dr.
Brian Fors, Dean of Student Affairs David Dailey, the executive boards of both campus’s
Student Senates and the advisors of the Senates were present.
We received no background materials in written form during our consultation meetings; however
we were offered any information that we would request via email should we desire it.
Administration is proposing a 3% increase in tuition with no increase in fees. This was a result of
the 3% decrease in state appropriations. There will also be differential tuition put in place for
IMT, nursing, welding and EMT/ Paramedics. These programs will go up an extra 3% on top of
the 3% that everyone will be subject to, which would put these programs at approximately $200
per credit.
As well as the tuition increase, 3 of our technical programs are being suspended. They are
MEST, Masonry and Wind. This suspension was due to enrollment, need of the industry, and
cost to run the program. Our MEST students were ending up taking a test to certify to work in
the mines and we have an IMT program that already has that section of industry covered.
Administration is hoping to be able to incorporate the Masonry program into the carpentry
program. With the Wind program, MN power is moving their wind energy to North Dakota and
focusing more on solar energy in our area. The money that will be saved from these programs
will be split amongst remaining programs where need is present.
Overall we had a satisfactory consultation process and Dr. Fors offered to make himself
available for any further or future questions that we might have.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions, concerns, or comments regarding Mesabi
Range Community and Technical College’s tuition consultation process. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Samantha Walker
President, Student Senate MRCTC – Eveleth Campus
samantha.walker162@students.mr.mnscu.edu
Luke Carlson
President, Student Senate MRCTC – Virginia Campus
luke.carlson808@students.mr.mnscu.edu
Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East Seventh Street
St. Paul MN 55101
23 April 2013
Dear Trustees,
The Student Senate at Northland Community and Technical College in East Grand Forks, MN (NCTC-EGF)
conducted Tuition Consultation meetings with the administration on our campus February 28 and April
4, 2013. The consultation meetings were attended by Dean Steve Crittenden, Dean Mary Fontes, Dean
Jodi Stassen, CFO Shannon Jesme, President Anne Temte and members of the Student Senate.
During the consultation the projected budgets for the college were discussed. The NCTC administration
intends to align itself with the recommendations from MNSCU as far as tuition increases. They are also
aware of the suggested 3% cap for every individual increase and have no intentions of surpassing that
amount.
Even though the administration provided information prior to the meeting, we found it difficult to: have
in depth conversations, negotiate alternatives, and take a stance with “projected” numbers. It is our
opinion that the state should have more concrete numbers to give to the administrators of our colleges
to bring to the table. Requesting us, as students, to submit a letter in April and try to discuss numbers
with administration that our legislature has not yet provided does an injustice to our students. As
student leaders, it is our job to get the facts and make our decisions based on those facts. The state of
Minnesota is not giving us the facts to work with in a timely manner and this is an issue that needs to be
addressed.
We, the Student Senate, have discussed the proposed amounts and understand the reasoning behind
the increases. The Senate feels that it is unfortunate that state backing of higher education has
consistently decreased and put the costs of doing business on the backs of the student.
Our Senate is excited to see the state working with the business industry to help give our schools the
equipment they need as well as investing in our students. We applaud this success and look forward to
more exciting initiatives to come.
Respectfully,
Wesley Stainbrook
Student Senate President
Northland Community and Technical College
East Grand Forks Campus
wesley_stainbrook@student.northlandcollege.edu
Northwest Technical College Student Senate
905 Grant Ave SE
Bemidji, MN 56601
April 25, 2013
Chancellor Rosenstone and Board of Trustees
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
500 Wells Fargo Place
30 East 7th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone and Trustees:
According to MNSCU’s Policy (Board Policy 2.3) Northwest Technical College submits this
letter outlining our budget consultation and the outcome of this process.
Tuition consultation took place on the NTC campus periodically throughout the year. On April
17 2013, NTC Student Senate was presented with an outline that included anticipated
increases to the 2013-2014 budget. Vice President of Finance Bill Maki and Dean of Students
Harry Cottrell and other pertinent administration spent time with the Student Senate explaining
these increases and their justifications for them.
NTC Administration proposed a 2.8% increase in tuition and other increases in fees to the
Nursing Program. After significant discussion NTC Student Senate has taken a stance of support
of the projected increases for the 2013-2014 fiscal year.
President Richard Hanson, Vice President Maki, and Dean Cottrell took our concerns under
consideration and have met our expectations for the 2013-2014 fiscal year.
NTC Student Senate feels the proposal satisfied all of the concerns of the students.
NTC Administration kept an open door policy to discuss any areas of concern that Student
Senate had.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you may have regarding the NTC
tuition consultation process. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
David D. Herberg
David D. Herberg
Campus Government President
david_herberg@live.ntcmn.edu
Dear Chancellor Rosenstone:
This letter is to inform you and the MnSCU Board of Trustees that the Student
Senate and the administration of St. Cloud Technical & Community College have
successfully completely the consultation process. The Student Senate is recommending
a tuition increase of 3% for the 2013-2014 school year. The Student Senate voted in
support of a $0.25 raise in our technology fee that is dedicated to upgrading computer
labs.
•
A 3% tuition increase for 2013-14.
o During the consultation process, Vice President Kloos presented the state
of our campus finances and possible scenarios based on different tuition
rates. Student Senate asked pertinent questions throughout this process.
After healthy debate, the students voted in favor of a 3% increase for
tuition and differential tuition rates for health majors. Online tuition
rates will remain at the same rate.
•
A $0.25 per credit increase in the Student Technology Fee.
o This was proposed by our Technology Fee Committee, which is made up
of 3 students and 2 faculty members. The fee increase is to put all public
used computers on a 3 yr upgrade plan and update other student used
technologies. Once the plan is in full effect any leftover funds will go
towards new technologies that the committee would review at that time.
•
A 0% increase in the Student Activity Fee.
o With some reworking and budget adjustments, the Student Activity Fee
doesn’t warrant an increase for the 2013-2014 academic year.
The Student Senate would like to thank campus administration for providing the
requested financial data in a timely manner and for their open participation in the
consultation process.
If you have any questions for us pertaining to our consultation process brought
by the St. Cloud Technical & Community College students, feel free to contact me at
320-308-5907.
Sincerely,
Chaz A. James, Student Senate President
April 25, 2013
Chancellor Steven Rosenstone
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
30 East Seventh Street, Suite 350
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone & Board of Trustees,
I am writing this letter today as requested under MnSCU Board Policy 2.3, student
involvement in decision-making. The Winona State University Student Senate (WSUSS)
has been properly consulted throughout the year by various members of administration
about tuition and its cost to students. Throughout the year, the WSUSS has received
numerous presentations updating the body on current budget projections, and how those
projections will change depending on the amount of state appropriation received.
At our April 3th, 2013 WSUSS meeting, the body approved a recommendation from the
Student Fee Management Committee (SFMC) to support a 3% increase to tuition for the
next fiscal year. However, this approval was far from unanimous, with 18 senators voting
in favor of the increase, and 7 senators voting in opposition. The discussion that led to
this decision was tumultuous and thoughtful. The decision to raise tuition on students was
the toughest of the year for our body.
In this discussion, student senators were faced with a decision to raise tuition 3% on each
student or to support a lower increase (or no increase) and face the consequences of that
decision, which would materialize in the form of cuts to programs – whether it be faculty,
staff or administration. Ultimately, the body made the difficult decision to raise tuition.
Although we recognize the additional strain this places on our students, when weighed
against the prospect of fewer course offerings and student support with a lower increase,
the senate chose raising tuition as “the lesser of two evils.” It is important to our body
that WSU continues to offer a high-quality, comprehensive higher education experience.
We recognize that this is not possible without funding our university at 100%, and that if
the state isn’t going to support our institution with increased appropriations, that students
must step up to fund their education.
I would be remiss to write this letter without including some of the sentiments of the
opposing senators. It is their consensus that there is no end in sight to rising tuition.
Several senators felt that WSU students are reaching the precipice where the cost of
tuition becomes restrictive and prices many students out of the market. Over the next two
years, all of us would like to see the legislature, MnSCU, and WSU work together to find
a solution that brings our students off this cliff, and brings us a year with a 0% tuition
increase.
The WSUSA supports a 3% increase to tuition at Winona State University. All current
information regarding both the state and university budget projections was disclosed to
the WSUSS and proper procedures were followed. Please feel free to contact me with
questions at AGriffin09@winona.edu or by phone at (608) 604-2019.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Griffin
President, Winona State University Student Senate
April 1, 2013
Chancellor Steven Rosenstone
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
30 East Seventh Street, Suite 350
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone & Board of Trustees,
I am writing this letter today as requested under MnSCU Board Policy 2.3, student
involvement in decision-making. The Winona State University Student Senate (WSUSS)
has been properly consulted throughout the year by administration regarding the Athletics
Fee.
At our March 13, 2013, WSUSS meeting, the body approved a Student Fee Management
Committee (SFMC) recommendation to support a 2.08% increase to our Athletic Fee.
The increase is almost exclusively due to the ever-increasing fuel costs that are affecting
all aspects of Winona State University, in conjunction with our expanding athletic
conference. In previous years, the Athletic Fee has remained relatively stable.
It’s important to note also that we have fresh personnel in WSU’s Athletic Department.
With a new Athletic Director and Associate Directors come a fresh vision for the
development of athletics at WSU. This increase will provide this leadership team with the
flexibility they need moving forward to enhance WSU’s athletic programs.
The WSUSS supports a 2.08% increase to the Athletic Fee. All current information on
this plan was disclosed to the WSUSS and proper procedures were followed. Please feel
free to contact me with questions at AGriffin09@winona.edu or by phone at (608) 6042019.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Griffin
President, Winona State University Student Senate
April 1, 2013
Chancellor Steven Rosenstone
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
30 East Seventh Street, Suite 350
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone & Board of Trustees,
I am writing this letter today as requested under MnSCU Board Policy 2.3, student
involvement in decision-making. The Winona State University Student Senate (WSUSS)
has been properly consulted throughout the year by administration regarding the Health
Services Fee.
At the March 13, 2013, WSUSS meeting, the body approved a recommendation from the
Student Fee Management Committee (SFMC) to support a 2.8% increase to the Health
Services Fee. With the growth of services at WSU’s Integrated Wellness Complex, there
has been increased use of WSU’s Health Services. With this increase in use, it is
necessary to adjust to the changing needs of our students. Given the rising costs of health
care delivery, the proposed increase will ultimately serve students better by sustaining
Health Services and its ability to provide services and products in high demand to our
students.
During the meeting, there was wide consensus among the WSUSS body that this increase
was the right thing to do. During yet another year of difficult budget choices, the WSUSS
body viewed this recommendation as particularly appropriate, since it directly impacts
the health and convenience of WSU students, particularly if we go forward with the
possibility of required health insurance for students in the Fall of 2014.
The WSUSS supports a 2.8% increase to the Health Services Fee. All current information
on this plan was disclosed to the WSUSA and proper procedures were followed. Please
feel free to contact me with questions at AGriffin09@winona.edu or by phone at (608)
604-2019.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Griffin
President, Winona State University Student Senate
April 1, 2013
Chancellor Steven Rosenstone
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
30 East Seventh Street, Suite 350
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone & Board of Trustees,
I am writing this letter today as requested under MnSCU Board Policy 2.3, student
involvement in decision-making. I’m pleased to inform you that various members of the
Winona State administration have properly consulted the Winona State University
Student Senate (WSUSS) throughout the year regarding the Room and Board rates of our
residence halls.
At our March 13, 2013, WSUSS meeting, the body approved an aggregate increase of
1.5% to the current Room and Board rates. The Residence Housing Association was also
consulted concerning the rate increase, and upon the RHA’s approval, brought the
proposed increase to the WSUSS for approval. During the meeting, there was wide
consensus among the WSUSS body that this increase was moderate and appropriate.
Director of Residence Life, Paula Scheevel, was available for questions, and addressed
concerns brought forth during the WSUSS meeting, including how the increase would
affect students on WSU’s Main and West campuses differently than students living in
WSU’s East Lake Apartments. With moderate increases to equalize rates among our
residence halls as well as to offset the increasing cost of food, the WSUSS was
comfortable with the proposal.
The WSUSS supports an aggregate 1.5% increase to the Room and Board rates at
Winona State University. All current information on this plan was disclosed to the
WSUSS and proper procedures were followed. Please feel free to contact me with
questions at AGriffin09@winona.edu or by phone at (608) 604-2019.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Griffin
President, Winona State University Student Senate
April 25, 2013
Chancellor Steven Rosenstone
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
30 East Seventh Street, Suite 350
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone & Board of Trustees,
I am writing this letter today as requested under MnSCU Board Policy 2.3, student
involvement in decision-making. The Winona State University Student Senate (WSUSS)
has been properly consulted throughout the year by various members of administration
regarding the Student Life Fee.
At our April 10, 2013 WSUSS meeting, the body approved a resolution to support a 0%
increase to the Student Life Fee. This increase allows us to address our depleted reserves
while continuing to fully fund our student life activities. Given our ability to achieve both
of those goals without raising the fee, made this decision relatively easy for the senate.
During the meeting, Winona State University CFO Scott Ellinghuysen, who co-chairs the
Student Fee Management Committee (SFMC) with the WSUSS Treasurer, was available
for questions. The Vice President for Student Life and Development, Connie Gores, was
also available for questions at the meeting. Additionally, many students on SFMC were
available to explain their position and why they supported the resolution. This
recommendation is the culmination of teamwork and problem-solving on the parts of
both students and administration.
The WSUSA supports a 0% increase to the Student Life Fee at Winona State University.
All current information on this plan was disclosed to the WSUSS and proper procedures
were followed. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at
AGriffin09@winona.edu or by telephone at (608) 604-2019.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Griffin
President, Winona State University Student Senate
April 1, 2013
Chancellor Steven Rosenstone
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
30 East Seventh Street, Suite 350
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone & Board of Trustees,
I am writing this letter today as requested under MnSCU Board Policy 2.3, student
involvement in decision-making. The Winona State University Student Senate (WSUSS)
has been properly consulted throughout the year by administration regarding the Student
Union Fee.
At our December 5, 2012, WSUSS meeting, the body approved a Student Fee
Management Committee (SFMC) recommendation to support a 3.3% increase to the
Student Union Fee. The Director of the Student Union, Joe Reed, was available for
questions from the WSUSS regarding the proposed increase. The fee increase’s main
purpose is to fund the Kryzsko Commons Redesign Project, for which I wrote a letter of
support in December.
The general mood regarding the increase was that, given Winona State’s past
commitment to future students that brought us the Darrell W. Krueger Library, the
Integrated Wellness Complex, and past expansions of the Student Union, this relatively
small increase was an investment in our future students. Additionally, the increase is
significantly lower than the previously projected increase for this year given the redesign
project. This information allowed for a decisive approval from the WSUSS.
The WSUSS supports a 3.3% increase to the Student Union Fee. All current information
on this plan was disclosed to the WSUSS and proper procedures were followed. Please
feel free to contact me with questions AGriffin09@winona.edu or by phone at (608) 6042019.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Griffin
President, Winona State University Student Senate
April 1, 2013
Chancellor Steven Rosenstone
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
30 East Seventh Street, Suite 350
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone & Board of Trustees,
I am writing this letter today as requested under MnSCU Board Policy 2.3, student
involvement in decision-making. The Winona State University Student Senate (WSUSS)
has been properly consulted throughout the year by administration regarding the
Technology Fee.
At our February 6, 2013, WSUSS meeting, the body approved a recommendation from
the Student Fee Management Committee (SFMC) to support a 0% increase to our
Technology Fee. The WSUSA body is always pleased to not raise fees on students, and
the Information Technology Services on campus have been especially good stewards of
the fee Winona State University students pay.
As one might expect, the 0% increase proposed passed unanimously through the WSUSS
body. In addition to Winona State’s technology costs remaining stable, a recent survey of
students showed strong support of the technology program on campus, a testament to the
hard work and ingenuity of our Winona’s IT services.
The WSUSA supports a 0% increase to the Technology Fee. All current information on
this plan was disclosed to the WSUSS and proper procedures were followed. Please feel
free to contact me with questions at AGriffin09@winona.edu or by phone at (608) 6042019.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Griffin
President, Winona State University Student Senate
April 1, 2013
Chancellor Steven Rosenstone
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
30 East Seventh Street, Suite 350
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Chancellor Rosenstone & Board of Trustees,
I am writing this letter today as requested under MnSCU Board Policy 2.3, student
involvement in decision-making. The Winona State University Student Senate (WSUSS)
has been properly consulted throughout the year by administration regarding the
Integrated Wellness Complex Fee (locally known as the Wellness Fee).
At our February 20, 2013, WSUSS meeting, the body approved a Student Fee
Management Committee (SFMC) recommendation to support a 1% increase to our
Integrated Wellness Complex Fee. Since the joint effort of state, students, and
community donation erected Winona State’s Integrated Wellness Complex, it is one of
the most heavily-used buildings on campus. We are now seeing more than 2,000 students
use the facility daily.
In essence, the increase reflects a desire to not only build up a reserve, but the needed
maintenance required due to the IWC’s high usage. This maintenance includes replacing
the tread on the treadmills and fixing any broken equipment. The WSUSS body was
satisfied with the explanation, and subsequently approved the recommendation by a wide
margin.
The WSUSS supports a 1% increase to the Integrated Wellness Complex Fee. All current
information on this plan was disclosed to the WSUSS and proper procedures were
followed. Please feel free to contact me with questions at AGriffin09@winona.edu or by
phone at (608) 604-2019.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Griffin
President, Winona State University Student Senate