Accretion power for beginners Overview • This lecture: • Accretion as a supply of energy • Accretion onto white dwarfs, neutron stars and black holes • X-ray binaries • Emission mechanisms 2 Context • This lecture has a high-energy astrophysics motivation. • The basic ideas about accretion power apply equally to lower-energy scenarios, e.g. the formation of the solar system. • But the specific examples I give here will be high energy. • MSSL’s astrophysics group started with X-ray astronomy, and high-energy astrophysics is still a key strength of MSSL. 3 What is accretion: • Chambers 20th Century dictionary* says: – to accrete: to unite, to form or gather round itself – accretion: continued growth • My definition of accretion: – growth by accumulating material * The dictionary that used to be in office 158 4 Why is this important as a source of energy? • There is an attraction between any two bodies due to gravity. • The two bodies have gravitational potential energy. • As two bodies fall together this potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. • By a number of emission mechanisms, this energy can be radiated. • Accretion is a means of getting energy from gravity. 5 How much energy can you get? • Gravity is a very weak force: – the gravitational attraction between individual particles is very small (c.f. electrostatic forces) – The gravitational potential energy is: E= -G m1m2 r12 Where G is the gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the masses and r12 is the distance between them. Note the ‘-’ sign 6 Lets think of an individual particle of mass m being accreted onto a body of mass M and radius R from an infinite distance. The potential energy lost by the particle is Initial potential energy – final potential energy E= GMm R 7 • Remember the potential energy lost is the kinetic energy gained by the particle. • Particle mass m is fixed. Gravitational constant G is fixed. So, to get high energy particles we need: Large mass M and/or Small radius R • Even though gravity is a weak force, accretion onto massive objects and/or compact objects is important in high energy astrophysics. 8 Accretion onto compact stars • We know of 3 types of compact stars: white dwarfs, neutron stars and black holes. • Start with the least extreme case, and work through to the most remarkable. 9 So what happens when we accrete some material onto the surface of a white dwarf? 10 Accretion onto white dwarfs • • • • • Mass M ~ 1 solar mass = 2 x 1030 kg Radius R ~ 107 m G=6.67 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 So energy released per kg is GM/R =1.4x1013 J If this is converted completely to kinetic energy then what speed will the material reach? 11 • • • • • Start with Newtonian physics Equate energy to 0.5 mv2 (= 0.5 v2) v=5x106 m s-1 Few % of c If all the energy is thermalised (i.e. the velocities are randomised) and assuming gas of protons and electrons, so mean particle mass = 0.5 mp: • 0.5 (0.5 mp)v2= (3/2) x kT • mp=1.67x10-27 kg, K =1.38x10-23 m2 kg s-2 K-1 • so kT ~ 50 keV 12 Important concept: accretion efficiency • How much energy can we get from accretion compared to fusion? • Energy released per unit mass of material accreted = GM/R • Energy equivalent per unit rest mass = c2 • So we can consider the ‘efficiency’ of accretion to be GM/(Rc2) • For a white dwarf this is ~ 1.5 x 10-4 • Fusion of hydrogen converts 0.007 of rest mass to energy so we could say this has an efficiency of 0.7% 13 What actually will happen? • Accretion onto a white dwarf not very efficient – 50 times less efficient than fusion – Need to accrete rapidly to be luminous source • Question: where can a white dwarf get enough material to be a luminous accretion powered source? 14 Answer: a companion star Hence the term X-ray binary 15 How will the accreting (‘primary’) star get material from the donor (‘secondary’) star? 2 possibilities… 16 1. Stellar wind or extended atmosphere Massive stars have strong dense winds, and eject large amounts of material: up to 10-6 solar masses per year for O stars 17 2. Gravitational disruption of secondary star: This is the only way to get substantial material from a low mass, main sequence secondary 18 Roche Lobes • Geometry considered by French mathematician Edouard Roche • Imagine the two stars as point masses rotating about their centre of mass. If we work out the force on a test particle at any place in the systems we can work out surfaces of constant potential. Close to the individual stars the potential surfaces will be spheres around the individual stars. Far away there will be one circle enclosing both stars. For some potential there will be two regions in contact. These regions are called the Roche Lobes. 19 20 If one of the stars fills its Roche lobe (it won’t be the compact star!) material can be transferred through the inner Lagrangian point. This is called “Roche lobe overflow”. 21 Question: What happens to the accreting material? Will it fall straight onto the white dwarf? Where and how will the kinetic energy be dissipated? 22 Answer • Because the binary is rotating, the material will not fall directly towards the primary. • How it gets to the white dwarf depends on the magnetic field of the white dwarf 23 Case 1: no magnetic field • The material leaving the secondary has angular momentum, so it cannot fall directly onto the primary. Instead it will form a disc. 24 Cataclysmic variable Picture by Dr Mark Garlick (ex-MSSL, now space artist and author) 25 • Angular momentum must be lost – Must be some friction or viscosity in the disk to allow material to move from the outside to the inside. – Inner parts of the disk will have higher velocities than outer parts, just like the Keplerian orbits of planets. – The viscosity will cause the material to radiate. – The disk will relatively flat but also dense, because it is constrained to lie in the orbital plane. 26 Viscosity: Imagine dividing the disk up into little pieces as shown. The inner piece is moving faster than the outer piece. Any drag between the two pieces will slow the inner piece and accelerate the outer piece – this transfers angular momentum. The outer piece will move outward, the inner piece will move inward. 27 Radiation emitted by the disc? • Up to half the available energy can be extracted by viscosity in the disc. – Proof: assume the material ends in a circular orbit at the W.D. surface – Accretion disc should be bright. • Flat but dense structure; optically thick. • The rest of the energy comes out when the material reaches white dwarf surface – thermal emission, may be optically thick or optically thin. 28 Case 2: strong magnetic field • White dwarfs can have fields of 103 T • Force on charged particles crossing magnetic field lines is proportional to magnetic field B. – If B is large, particles cannot cross! – Material will be channeled directly along the magnetic field lines onto the white dwarf. – No disc. 29 Slide 9 Charged particle in a magnetic field F=q x v⊥ x B Slide 10 Charged particle in a magnetic field • F=q x v⊥ x B • circular motion in the plane of the sky perpendicular to B • no acceleration parallel to B • gyro frequency is qB 2πm • ‘cyclotron radiation’ – What will the emission mechanisms be? 32 ASCA observation of Spinning magnetic white dwarf in AO Psc (2 day lightcurve) 33 • • • • velocity only a few % of c moderate photon energy density strong magnetic field In the end the material crashes into white dwarf 34 2 emission mechanisms • Cyclotron emission • Thermal emission • Both come from “Accretion column”. – Optically thin at the top where there is a shock. – Optically thick at the bottom where the density is high. 35 36 What about accretion onto Neutron stars? • • • • Mass M ~ 1.5 solar mass = 3 x 1030 kg Radius R ~ 1.3 x 104 m So energy released per kg is GM/R =1.5x1016 J This is an ‘efficiency’ of about ~15% – So we expect neutron star X-ray binaries to have much higher luminosities than cataclysmic variables. 37 Sco X-1 discovery observation • Rocket flight by Giacconi et al 1962 38 Also: • V -> half the speed of light – relativistic effects important • Magnetic field can be up to 108 T – (truly astronomical magnetic field!) • Emission mechanisms? 39 Emission mechanisms in neutron star binaries • • • • Large magnetic field – high energy cyclotron v->c, and large magnetic field – synchrotron v->c, photon density large – inverse Compton Particles interactions in the disk, and on collision with neutron star surface – thermal emission 40 Black holes: energy from throwing things into bottomless pits? • Important difference from other stars: • Black holes do not have a solid surface • Nothing can escape from within the Schwarzschild radius (non-rotating hole) • RS=2GM/c2 • If E per unit mass = GM/R, E= 0.5 at RS • So in principle might expect efficiency of ~0.5 41 Caution: • In Newtonian mechanics material dropped into the hole will reach the speed of light. Need special relativity to deal with it properly. • Actually need general relativity to deal with such strong gravity. • However, basic features of accretion onto a black hole can be gleaned just remembering that nothing, not even light, escapes from within RS. 42 Getting the energy out • No physical surface -> no impact! – (c.f. NS, WD, 50% of energy released at surface) – The energy can be “advected” into the hole. – So any energy that is going to come out has to escape before the material gets to RS • This means that the accretion disk will be an extremely important source of radiation in an accreting black hole • Efficiency will be < 50% (probably ~10%) • Emission mechanisms? 43 Emission mechanisms • Similar to the neutron star binaries, but without the extraordinarily strong magnetic fields. • Thermal emission from the disc • v->c, photon density large – inverse Compton • v->c, and magnetic field -- synchrotron 44 Finding black holes • Black holes are not science fiction, we have found them as X-ray sources in our own galaxy and in the LMC. • X-ray/γ-ray surveys so far are the only way we have successfully found stellar mass black holes. 45 Key points: • Accretion can be a significant source of energy provided: – It is onto a compact and/or massive object – There is a sufficient supply of fuel • X-ray binaries satisfy both these criteria • Accretion onto a WD has lower efficiency than fusion (~10-4) • Accretion onto a NS or BH has higher efficiency than fusion (~0.15) 46