195?
ANNUAL REPORT
of
HOP INVESTIGATIONS
(OAES 36, ORBS)
1.
2.
3.
L.
5.
6.
7.
Distribution of Copies
S.N.Brooks, Farm Crops Dept., O.S.C.
Industrial Crops Section, A.R.S.
Director, O.S.C. Agr, Expt. Sta.
C.E.Horner, Bot.and Plant Path. Dept. 0.S
S.T.Likens Agr. Chem. Dept., O.S.C.
Industrial Crops Section, A.R.S.
Farm Crops Dept., O.S.C.
Stanley N.
Chester B.
Sam T. Likens,
Pathologist
midst
OREGON AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
Corvallis, Orogen
Department of farm Crops,
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology,
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, 0.3.0.
and
Industrial Crops Section,
Oilseed and Industrial Crops Researdh Branch,
Crops Research Division, A.R.S.,
cooperating
NOP BRNIDING F R TIC!
YIELDING Ainurr.
T
DISEASE
UALITI AND
23
32
CervallismPresser Yield Trial
Experimental Yield Trial
THE EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES AS DUSTS OR SPRAYS FOR HOP DISEASE
Chester I
NTROL.
Horner
ow Control Trials
for Root Rot Control
° bserrations on Diseases in Oregon and Washington Hop
THE DEVELOPMENT OF FIELD, GRE
TO BREEDING, DISEASE AND AGRO
LABORATORY TECHNIQUES RELATIVE
STIGATIONS ON HOBS.
41)
56
57
59
Chester I. Horner
Absorption asrd Transleoation of Streptomycin
AGRONOMIC INVESTIGATIONS RELATIVE. TO
AND QUALITY IN HOPS.
by Hops
60
ENG AND MAINTAINING YIELD
4$
Stanley N., Brooks
Chemical Stripping and Suckering Trial
Fuggier' Irrigation .Fortility Experiment
Faggles Height of Stripping Trial
Time and Severity of Pruning Study
Cultural Studies with Hallertau Hops
63
67
78
80
83
APPENDIX
Cultural Operations, College Hop Iarrd, 1957
rvallisrosser Yield Trial
Edperimental Yield Trial
Streptomyoin Dusts and Sprays
Comparison of Commercial Formulations of Streptomycin
soil TreatmOnt for Root Rot Control
Chemical Stripping and Suckering Trial
Tuggle, Irrigation.Fortility-Uporiment
Fuggles Height of Stripping Trial.
Date and Severity of Pruning Study
Evaluation of Strobilest Storage
Bullion. Fertiliser Trials 1957
1h7
150
152
155
158
160
166
172
the to
the D. 3. D. A44 A. 8. 3
Agricalt
Experiment &Wien, and the
Irrigation Experiment Station at Presser, Washiagtop* For ease in mitering,
desoriptions
summaries and summarising data are inelmded is the fore part if
the report by special! line project.
Additionalidatalehich are important
enough to include as a matter of permanent record ate included in an appendix
at the end of the report.
Sine' some of the line projects
personnel located at Oregon State Coll o
a vely by
more than ors investigator may
have work reported in one line project report. An attempt has been wade to
give each investigator full credit for his contribution to the year's work.
The work reported in this report is directed along five lines
involving studies on hop culture, breeding, disease and quality investigations.
The studies on hop culture and breeding are cooperative among the agronomist,
the chemist and the plant pathologist The studies on disease control are
conducted by the plant pathologist.
Chemical studies are cooperative between
the Chemist and the agronomist on certain phases, and other phases are
oonduoted independently by the Chemist. A fifth type of investigation
includes studies of field, greenhouse and laboratory techniques relative to
the breeding, disease and agronomic lines of endeavor.
Any one of the project
leaders may have work reported under this line project from time to time.
Financial support of these investigations is borne by A. R. S., the
Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Irrigation Experiment Station
at Prosser, Washington.
In addition, certain anneal grants of funds are
Sta. Wasp
for essaiusting
termisms
The
of the work at
Hop
age,
severe reeession in
t
n considerable Improvement
in this
situation, and the industry
is once again en a sound basis, A gontinuation of expansion could,
however, bring about another recession by 1961.
The future ©f hops will
in the next 3 or 4 years.
depend upon the export market to a largo extent
Following is a table showing acreages and production minor 1946.
Hop acreage and production in the Pacific Northwest, 19464957.
sted
1957
State
19645
(Ds
197
Yield per
Januarys 1958 estimate
of 1958 hop acreage **
new acres
total acres
Washington
13,360
15,200
1,686
1,560
3,450
18,650
California
8,210
5,600
1,56
1,220
400
60000
12,980
4,500
1,083
1,230
650
5,150
Idaho
1,075
2,400
1,802
1,690
1,100
3,500
PNW
35,625
27,700
1,446
1,449
5,600
33,300
Oregon
January 20, 1958, U.S.D.A.,
* From Hop Haricot Review, Vol. XXVIII No. 1,
A.M.80, Grain Division.
January 20, 1958
** From The Brewers Bulletin., Tole 51, No. 6,
;1N
40sel7
Jan.
Mar.
Apr.
Yaw
Jams
Jay
Aug.
Sept.
53.13
63..13
67.5
78.06
77.48
80.23
38.3
36.0
2.87
464
1ob.
51.0
55.9
33+2
39.52
40.77
47.48
49.53
49.13
48.35
69.0
73.8
80.7
81.3
76.7
.5.86
1.38
4456
X31.74
41.86
46.33
50.95
57.47
61.20
63.6
62.9
64.5
52.2
51.9
49.1
LIMO
514.6
145.6
39.43
354
37.7
404
45.1
494
34950
630
to96
48
1$311
32.66
34.90
46.8
51.6
57.0
67..7
66,.14
66.7
63.0
2.78
4.89
7.01
2.11
3.27.
646
4.714
341
2.05
1.07
.17
.22
340
Yearly
total
Yearly
34.76
61.3
63.7
53.2
51.0
141.0
Avg. wird
Mo.
Avg.
Ma
Apr.
May
Jane
July
Aug.
Sept.
78.5 81.2
794 76.0
2.744
4461
Yearly
total
Yearly
sem
7
8.9
12 9.9
75.4 75.6 4.624 4.685 3 863
69.9 70.7 7.046 6.485 8 17.4
76.0 74.8 5.868 5.923 13 15.9
760 81.0 5.036 3.829 18 15.9
3.1430
61 76.2
75.6 76.6 5.20 4.
velocity
1957 yr. 1957 yr. 1957 yr. 1957 yr.
Avg.
...Au.
19 10.8
12 12.4
20 1.22
2310.3
114 9.
7
8.9
95 63.6
38.33
Avg.
3
9.11
8.5
9.2
0 3.1
It 6.2
7
7
5
54
26 41.14
KPH
Avg. 1957 Avg.
12 13.3 1.74 2.10
14 10.6 1.00 1.27
6 8.9 1.08 1.31
2
2.8 1.86
34
1.147
1.89 450
3 5.5 1.88 1.61
2
39 144.2
1.58 1.54
be reported in two
neeessarilr bread and involves the merk of all
erder to make the results mere meaningrell agre
data are all summarised by evaluation trial within this line
than being separated into three sections of the report
Genetic diversity for the breeding program consists of four widsl.y
grown varieties and approximately 75 introductions of which only a few remain
Many of them are new represented only by first or later generation progeny,
sons hays been discarded entirely.
Mons of the varieties or introductions
have exhibited impunity to downy mildew.
Some of them possess acceptable
quality and agronomic characteristics, but none of them are sufficiently
satisfactory in all important features that improvement through breeding is
not desirable.
The breeding program has been confined, in general
varietal crossing involving both domestic and foreign varieties.
inter
Selectiaen
is based upon resistance to disease, primarily downy mildew, desirable
agronomic characteristics, and chemical analyses.
The testing of advanced lines has now reached the point where it is
necessary for final evaluation to take place under actual field conditions in
several locations.
Release of any of the lines as recommended varieties i
contingent upon their performance in such trials.
An informal memorandum of understanding has been drawn up which
will regulate an off-station testing program in Oregon and Washington in
12114 and 1
1070 -1
stied in:Washingtszt.
will bo
The lines 1124, 1354, 12114 and 1444 will undergo
in ftegen. By 1959:aiest if these lines rAmeaywillb* in
teat,
granola California and Idaho
s line 3
There hive been additional
year.. The Early Maturity, nd the Late Maturity
jest t
Id trials were discontinued
at the end of the 1956 season after having yielded five years of data on the
constituent lines.
It was decided that none of the lines would be carried
further in the program.
The high-low Fuggles selections were discontinued at the end of the
1956 season, and the results are being summarised for publication.
Most of
the selections are being held in order that eventually a study can be madete
determine the causes for their differences.
Genetic estimates were not computed this year due to lack of time.
It is planned that more work along this
will, have to wait another year.
line will be done, however, it
More extensive genetic estimates were made
during 1957 from data collected in 1956 in the High-low Fuggles selections.
No summary of these data will be made here, but it will be included in the
publication on this particular trial.
Seed was collected from a total of 262
ontrolled parentage and Openp.
pollinated sources in 1957.
The first 40 crosses (Group I) in the list involve combinations of
downy mildew resistant x resistant, resistant x susceptible, susceptible x
resistant, and susceptible x susceptible individuals using the following female
and male plants as parents.
Resistant females
106(506)
209(409)
019032
019026
4094(209-2)019067
119120
214.2(414-2)C19084
25.S
Sus° . females
Resistant males
Susc. males
210(410) 019027
212(1412) 019028
216(416) 019029
314(314) 019076
505(105) 019063
1214(525)
019062M
421.1,2(225)019040M
221.2(425-1)051101M
317-1,2(317)019041M
3214(325) 019049M
521445(126)019010M
Wherever sufficient seedlings are obtained from a progeny, approximately
100 randomly selected plants will be grown under close spacing in the field for
a period of two or three production years.
These progenies will be used to
furnish inheritance data on resistance to downy mildew and perhaps other
characteristics.
Clones of the parental material will be grown in the same
nursery area.
Any seedlings in excess of 100 will be subjected to a greenhouse
downy mildew epiphytotic during the spring of 1958 for the purpose of screening
out downy mildew susceptible plants.
Records will be kept of seedling progeny
performances for future comparison with mature plant progeny performances.
19 crosses (Group II) were made involving the parental combinations
from which at least 5 downy mildew resistant seedlings were obtained in 1957
or which had an insufficient number of seedlings in their progenies to
constitute a good test in 1957.
These erosses mars
57%2
57161
57136
57138
57141
57047
57071
57073
57088
57197
57218
57225
57256
g1846
57186
57196
571145
57149
79 crosses (Group III) were made involving female parents which, on
the basis of their openspollinated progenies in 1956 and 1957, exhibited promise
as parents.
These females produced progeny (OP) from which downy mildew resistant
seedlings were selected.
The males used in these crosses were those which had
resistant seedlings in either 1956 or 1957 when they were crossed with females
other than these.
This group of crosses was by far the largest group of controlled
crosses made, and except for group II could be expected to produce the greatest
percentage of superior seedlings, since all parents have been progeny tested
to some extent.
Females:
102.3
111-2
214.3
304.2
113 -].
314
201 -1
3152
202-3
203
208-3
501.3
503-2
504-1
504.2
7.3
15.5
23-s
507 -1
211 -1
315-3
401
403
405.2
507-2
507-3
511-3
35-6
36-s
41-5
46-s
119-1,2
219 -1,2
1417 -1,2
5204,2
u9-4,5
219-5
318.1,2
318.4,5
417-5
418.1,2
418.5
It:
120.1,2
120-5
121.4,5
217.1,2
217.4,5
218.1,2
319.2(na's)419.1,2
319-4,5
420.4,5
320 -1,2
320-4,5
517-1,2
314.6
110.3
119.3
124.3
221-1
48.5
50.5
58-S
61-5
94-6
148.6
57086
57092
57104
57105
57106
57128
57129
57130
57131
57132
57133
57134
57135
57137
57143
57144
57044
57051
57053
57054
51062
57063
57066
57067
57068
57069
57070
57072
57074
57080
57081
57082
57146
57147
57148
57152
57153
57154
57156
57160
57183
57185
57192
57194
57198
57204
57206
57214
57215
57230
57231
57232
57233
57234
57235
57236
57237
57238
57239
57240
57241
57242
57243
57244
57245
57246
57247
57248
57249
57250
57251
57252
57253
57254
57255
57257
57258
57259
57262
Group IV consisted of 18 crosses constituting a progeny test on a
number of new male lines which had not been used in the 1956 crossing program.
These males were crossed with two to four unselected females.
Superior
breeding male lines will be selected for use in the breeding program on the
basis of the performance of their progenies in the 1958 nursery.
Progeny test crosses obtained
Males
518-2
518-5
519-2
219.4
223.5
201.s
199-S
317-4
419-5
5204
(052040m)
(0520410
(c52042m)
(051061m)
(053488m)
(053078m)
(053076m)
(051054m)
(052048m)
(052044m)
57178
57175,
57177,
57176,
57078
57179,
57111
57110,
57150,
57172
57120
57121
57119
57122
57155, 5717o
57157, 57171
No seed was obtained from crosses involving male line 197 -S.
This
male, along with 518-2, 223-5, and 520.5, should be further tested next year.
199-8 and 2018 have already been discarded because of extreme susceptibility
to downy mildew.
Open- pollinated seed was collected from all female plants in the
breeding block which were acquired in 1950 or later, in addition to Fuggles
and Late Clusters.
This group of crosses (Group V) will constitute a progeny
to
subjected
be
will
seedlings
all
I,
Group
in
progenies
the
of
portions
of
exception
the
With
greenhouse.
the
in
germinated
be
will
seed
the
weeks
six
of
period
a
for
vermiculite
moist
in
36° F
at
stratification
Following
312
115-2(noits
309-2 309-1
2044
306-3(na
Is
10-2(no
t)
57227 57224 57223 57221 57168 57127 57126 57123
57117 57115 57114 57091 5709057084 57083 57077 57076
2184 217-2 121-5 120.5 118.4
Its)
516-2 516-1 515-3 514.2513-3
3134
1(nol'a)
219-
316-1(noVs)
318-5 221-2 220.1
5114(noIvs)
5024(neXis)
407-3
301.3(nalts)
303-2(nells)
306-1(ieVe)
306-2(na1os)
213-2
209
females:
Late
Late
block.
breeding
the
in
lines
late
very
the
of
several
combined
which
1
August
after
made
were
VII
)
(Group
crosses
17
males.
better
the
of
adaptability
and
vigor,
resistance,
disease
with
combination
in
introductions
the
of
characteristics
quality
the
possess
which
lines
developing
of
purpose
the
for
program
backereseing
a
initiate
to
is
intention
The
respectively.
56002,
1
and
56001
1
Backe,
and
Hellertau
are
introductions
These
1956.
in
acquired
were
which
introductions
now
tee
from
seed
openepollinated
obtaining
of
consixted
1957
in
VI
Group
30340
211.4 2080.3
313-1(D
-20 3094(D
309
3-14
406A405-3 405-2
1391094
-8
516-2
D)
soul507.3507-1
504 502.3 5062 5024
2
406
512-3 512-1 511-3 511-2 511-1 510.2 510.1 509-1
506-3 506-2 506.15010 504.2 5044503-2
501-3 501.1 413.3 413-2 408.2407-2406-3
405-1316-2 3164 313-2
3044 304-1
213-2(D)
2114
On3.y selected seedlings
7
of
(507s.3) C 54029 in 1957.
11 mated sample of cones
maybe sterile similar to 128 z (C 19113) and 5154 (11503) C 54009.
Seedling Nur
A total of 827 seedlings were selected following the greenhouse
downy mildew screening program in the spring of 1957.
These seedlings were
transplanted in the field under normal spacing where they will grow until the
end of the 1958 season.
At that time a smell number of the outstanding
seedlings will be selected for subsequent evaluation.
The 827 seedlings
present 197 progenies out of a total of 273
controlled parentage and open - pollinated sources
obtained in 1956.
These
ub-
seedlings comprise approximately two percent. of the 40,000 seedlings
jected to the greenhouse screening program.
ions saved
1957
21 selections were saved from the 1953, 1954 and 1955 material
in the disease nursery.
19 selections were saved from the 1956 nursery.
The males in these groups will go into the breeding block where they will be
progeny tested for breeding behavior.
The females from these groups will
be increased and grown in five-hill observation plots.
The observation
plots will serve also as increase plots for those lines which appear to
warrant further evaluation in the disease nursery and in yield trials.
57
106 (506) C 19032 x 121.2
Moe
106 (506) C 19032 x 221-2 (4254) c 51101 m
57003
106 (506) C 19032 x 317-1,2 (317) C 19041 M
57004
106 (506) C 19032 x 321-1 (325) c 19049 m
57005
106 (506) C 19032 x 421.1,2 (225) C 19040 M
57006
106 (506) C 19032 x 521-4,5 (126) C 19010 m
57007
209 (409) C 19026 x 121-2 (525) C 19062 m
57006
209 (409) C 19026 x 221-2 (425-1) C 51101 M
57009
209 (409) C 19026 x 317-1,2 (317) C 19041 m
57010
209 (409) c 19026 x 321-1 (325) C 19049 m
57011
209 (409) C 19026 x 421-1,2 (225) C 19040 m
57012
209 (409) C 19026 x 521-4,5 (126) C 19010 m
57013
210 (410) C 19027 x 317-1 (317) c 19041 M
57014
210 (410) C 19027 x 521-4,5 (126) C 19010 N
57015
212 (412) c 19028 x 121-2 (525) c 19062 m
57016
212 (412) C 19028
57017
212 (h12) C 19028 x 317-1,2 (317) C 19041 m
57018
212 (412) C 19028 x 321-1 (325) C 19049 m
57019
212 (412) c 19028 x 421-1,2 (225) c 19040 m
57020
212 (412) C 19028
57021
214.2 (414-2) C 19084 x 317-1,2 (317) C 19041 m
57022
216 (416) c 19029 x 321-1 (325) c 19049 m
57023
216 (416) c 19029 x 521-4,5 (126) c 19010 m
57024
314 (314) c 19076 x 121-2 (525) c 19062 m
57025
314 (314) C 19076 x 221-2 (425-1) C 51101 m
x 221-2 (425-1) C 51101 m
x 521-4,5 (126) c 19010 m
4
7
) C 19041
1949 M
6
le
) C 29067 x 317.1,2 (317)
0
19041 m
57030
409-2 (
57011
409-2 (209.2) G 19067 x 522.4,5 (126) C 19010 M
57032
505 (105) C 19063 x 121-2 (525) C 19062 N
57033
505 (105) C 19063 x 2214 (425-1) C 51101 m
57034
505 (105) c 19063 x 317-1,2 (317) C 19041 M
57035
505 (105) C 19063 x 421.1,2 (225) C 19040 M
57036
505 (105) C 19063 x 5214,5 (126) C 19010 m
57037
254-1 19120 x 317-1,2 (317) C 190141 m
57038
25.5-1 19120 z 321-1 (325) C 19049 M
57039
25.3 -I 19120 x 4214,2 (225) C 19040 m
57040
254-1 19120 x 521-4,5 (126) C 19010 m
57041
101.2 (501-2) C 50075 x 0 r
57042
101-2 (501-2) o 50075 x 120-42(523) c 19060 m
57043
102.3 (502-1) C 50091 x o P
57044
102 -3 (502-1) C 50091 x 320-1,2 (323) c 190147 N
57045
103-3 (503.1) C 52016 x 0 P
57046
104.1 (504-3) C 53046 x 0 P
570147
108 (508) C 19033 z 124-8-C 19183 M
57048
109-1 (509-3) C 53050 x 0 P
57049
111 -1 (511-3) C 53052 x 0 P
57050
111-2 (511-2) C 50054 x 0 p
13
c 50054 z 41,44
73Y
C 53053 x 0.4
57053
053053 x 12144 0 19183
57054
C
57055
53053 x 2194.0 (1421) 0 19053 x
) c 52018
0 P
57056
(
) C 52017 x
101?
57057
(
) C 5203.
0P
57058
(
) c 52420
P
57059
115-2 (515-2) C 53054 x
57060
122. 1 19208
57061
201-1 (401-3) C 53030 x
0 P
57062
201-1 (401.3) C 53030 m
119 -1,2 (521) C 19058 M
57063
201.1 (4013) C 53030 x
217.1,2 (417) C 19050
570614
201.2 (401.2) c 52006 x
0 P
57065
202 -3
(402.1) C 53031
57066
202 -3
(402.1) C. 53031 x
57067
202.3 (402-1) C 53031 x
57068
203 (403) C 19022
x
57069
203 (403) 0 19022
x 121-4,5 (524)
57070
203 (403) C 19022
x
218 -1,2 (419) C 19051 M
57071
203 (403) C 19022
x
318 -1,2 (319) C 19043 M
57072
203 (403) C 19022
x 320-4,5 (324) C 19048 M
57073
203 (403) C 19022
x
416.1,2 (219) I 19006 M
57074
203 (403) 0 19022
x
119.S- C 19180 M
57075
2044 (404.2) C
x
0 P
0 P
x
0 P
217.4,5 (418 ) C 19085 X
320.1,2 (323) C 19047
1241,2 (523) C 19060 M
53035 2
0 P
0 19061 M
14
Grits, 1*.
076
2044 (40
53035 z 2174,2 (417) C 19050 X
2044 (4044)
53035 x 220-1 (423) 0 19054 X
57078
206 (406) C 19024 x
57079
208.3 (408.1) c 53037
57080
208-3 (408-1) C 53037 x 119445 (520) C 19057 X
57 1
208-3 (408-1) C 53037 x 120.5 (5224) c 19059 H
57082
208-3 (408-1) c 53037 x 318-4,5 (320) C 19044 14
57083
209 (409) C 19026 x 121.5 (524) c 19061 m
57084
209 (409) C 19026 x 217-2 (417) 0 19050 M
57085
211-1
57086
211-1 (411.3) C 53040 x 119-8- C 19180 H
57087
211-2 (1411 -2) 0 53039 x 0 P
57088
211-2 (4114) C 53039 x 219.1,2 (421) C 19053 M
57089
213-2 (413-2) 0 514025 x 0 P
57090
213-2 (1413 -2) C 514025 x 217-2 (417) C 19050 H
57091
213-2 (1413-2) C 514025 x 220-1
57092
214-3 (414.1) c 19083 x 1420.145 (2214) C 19039 H
57093
215-2 (115.2) C 52013 x 0 P
570914
215-3 (415.1) C 52012 x 0 P
57095
222 - 1 19209 x 0 P
57096
301-1 (301-3) C 500140 x 0 P
57097
301-2 (301-2) C 500214 x 0 P
57098
301.3 (301-1) C 50019 x 0 P
57099
302-1 (302.3) c 52001 x 0 P
57100
302.3 (302 -1) c 51065 x 0 P
C 53088 X
x0P
(4u-3) c 53040 x 0 P
(423) C 190514 M
Cross No.
5110
303.2 010
C 53022
x' 0 P
57102
304.1 (30404) c 52002
x 0 P
57103
3014.2 (3014 -2) C 53023
x 0 P
57104
3044 (3044) C 53023
2191,2 (421) C 19051 M
57105
304.2 (304.2) C 53023
X 218+1,2 (419) C 19051 M
57106
304-2 (304-2) C 53023
X 31844,2 (319) C 19043 M
57107
306.1 (306-3) c 51105
x 0 P
57108
3106-2 (306 -2) C 51104
x 0 P
57109
306-3 (306-1) C 51103
x 0 P
57110
307 (307) c 19020
x 317.4 (318-2) C 51054 m
57111
307 (307) c 19020
x 199-s- C 53076 m
57112
308 -3 (308-1) C 51021
x 0 P
57113
309.1 (309-3) C 53026
x 0 P
57114
309-1 (309-3) C 53026
x 120.5 (522.1) c 19059 M
57115
309.1 (309-3) C 53026
x 318-5 (320) C 19044 m
57116
309-2 (309.2) C 53025
x 0 P
57117
309-2 (309.2) C 53025
x 120-5 (522-1) C 19059 m
57118
309.2 (309.2) c 53025
x 219-1- (421) C 19053 m
57119
311 (311) I 19001
x 219-4 (422.2) C 51061 m
57120
311 (311) I 19001
x 518-5 (120) c 52041 m
57121
311 (311) I 19001
x 519.2 (121) C 52042 m
57122
311 (311) I 19001
x 201-5- C 53078 m
57123
312 (312) c 19021
x 318-5 (320) C 19044 m
57124
313-1 (313 -3) c 53028
x 0 P
57125
313-2 (313.2) C 52001
x 0 P
Cross
320)01
(313.2) C
44
57126
31,3
57127
311.2 (3134) C 52004 x 12065 (522.1) C 19059 M
57128
314 (314) C 19076 x 120-5 (522-1) 0 19059 M
57129
314 (314) C 19076 x 12144,5 (524) C 19061 M
57130
314 (314) 0 19076 x 221.1 (1425-2) C 51114 m
57131
314 (314) C 19076 x 218-1,2 (419) C 19051 m
57132
314 (314) C 19076 x 100-5- C 19173 M
57133
314 (314) C 19076 x 124-5- C 19183 m
57134
315-2 (315-2) C 19078 x 318-4,5 (320) 0 19044 M
57135
315-2 (315-2) C 19078 x 319-4,5 (322) c 19046 M
57136
315 -3 (315-1) C 19077 x 110-5. C 19173 m
57137
315 -3 (315-1) C 19077 x 417-1,2 (217) C 19036 m
57138
315-3 (315-1) c 19077 x 119-1,2 (521) C 19058 m
57139
316-1 (316-3) C 52005 x
57140
316-2 (316.2) C 53029 x 0 P
57141
316-2 (316 -2) c 53029 x
57142
322 - I 56001 x 0 P
57143
401 (201) C 19012 x 217-2 (417) C 19050 m
57144
401 (201) C 19012 x 219.1,2 (421) C 19063 m
57145
401 (201) C 19012 x 219-5 (422-1) C 51060 m
57146
401 (201) C 19012 x 221-1 (425-2) c 51114 m
57147
401 (201) C 19012 x 320-4,5 (324) c 19048 M
57148
401 (201) C 19012 x 418-1,2 (219) I 19006 m
57149
401 (201) c 19012 x 521-4,5 (126) C 19010 m
57150
402 (202) C 19013 x 419-5 (222) C 52048 m
P
218-1,2 (419) C 19051 m
(202) 0
1$1-8-C 53074 X
403 (203) a 1011 z 119-42-(521) 0 1905S x
c 1 9 0 3 1 z 217-44 (418) 0 19085*
(203) 0 1.9 011 x 31244 (320) c
)C 19014
it
1904h l
317-4 (31242) c 51054 m
57156
403 (203) C 19031
14.94, 2
57157
404 (200 C 19014 x
4294 (222) C 52048 m
57158
405-1 (205-3) c 54022
0P
57159
405-2 (205-2) c 54011
ZOP
57160
405.2 (205-2) C 54011
x 2194 (422
57161
405-2 (205-2) C 54011
x
57162
405-2 (205-2) c 51021
X 4184 (220) C 520147 H
572$3
405-3 (205-1) c 54010
57164
406.1 (206-3) c 54013
X4P
X0P
57165
406-2 (206-2) c 50022
X0P
57166
406-3 (206-1) C 50021
x0P
57167
407-2 (207.2) c 54015
X0P
57268
407-3 (207-1) c 54014
x
57169
408.2 (203.2) C 51049 x
57170
4 1 1 (211) c 1 9 0 1 5
57171
411 (211) C 19015
57172
411 (211) c 19015 x 5204 (124) c 52044 m
57173
413-2 (213-2) C 50053 x 0
57174
413-3 (213-1) C 50052 z 0 P
57175
416 (216) 1
57176
416 (216) 1 19043 x 219-4 (422-2) c 51061 m
z
(221) C 19037 M
C
4175 (218) C 52046 H
1 1 8 - 4
18)
119
0P
317-4 (318-2) c 51054 m
419-5 (222) C 52048 m
19003 x 518-5 (120) C 52041 m
t
I 1
C 52042 X
I 1
C 52040 N
57179
144
57180
422 1560 x 0 P
57181
501.1 (201.3) G 50016
57182
501.3 (101.1)050008x0p
57183
501-3 (101-1) c 50008 x 320.445
57184
501-3 (101.1) c 50008 s 420.445 (224) C 19039 m
57185
501-3 (101-1) c 50008 x 517-242 (117) C 19008 N
57186
502.3 (101-1) c 50008 x 521-445 (126) c 19010 m
57187
502-1 (102-3) c 51048 x 0 P
57188
502-2 (102.2) C 51041 x 0 P
57189
5023 (102 -1) C 51027 x 0 P
57190
5034 (103-3) C 50028 x 0 P
57191
503.2 (1030 C 53002 x 0 P
57192
503-2 (103-2) C 5300e x 318-445 (320) c 19044 m
57193
504.1 (104-3) c 54004 x 0 P
57194
504.1 (104-3) c 54004 x 318 -1,2 (319) C 19043 M
57195
504-2 (104-2) c 54003 x 0 P
57196
504.2 (104-2) C 54003 x 221-2 (425-1) c 51101 m
57197
504-2 (104-2) c 54003 z 221.1 (425.2) C 51114 M
57198
504.2 (1044) C 54003 x 521.2 (125) C 52045 N
57199
504-3 (104-1) c 54002 x 0 P
57200
506-1 (106-3) C 50032 x 0 P
3078 m
x 0 P
324) c 19048 m
57201
506.2 (106.2) C 50031 x 0 P
57202
5060,3
57203
507 1 (107-3) C 54007 A x 0 P
57204
507-1 (107-3) 0 54007 11
57205
507..3
57206
507-3 (107 -1) C 54005 x
57207
508-1 (108-3) c 50046 x o P
57208
509-1 (109.3) C 50056 x
0 P
57209
5104 (110-3) C 52038 x
0 P
57210
004
(110 2) C 52037 x
0 P
57211
511-1 (111.3) C 50080 x
0 p
57212
511-2 (1112) C 50071 x
0 P
57213
511-3 (111 -1) c 53007 x
0 P
57214
511-3 (111-1) C 53007 x
318.1,2 (319) C 19043 M
57215
511..3
57216
512-1 (112-3) C 50114 x
0 P
57217
512-3 (112-1) 0 53008 x
0 P
57218
512..3
57219
513.2 (113-2) C 50017 x
0 P
57220
513-3 (113-1) c 53010 x
0 P
57221
513-3 (113-1) C 53010 x
2184 ()119) C 19051 M
57222
514-2 (114-2) C 53013 x
0 P
57223
514-2 (114.2) C 53013 x
218-1 (419) C 19051 M
57224
514-2 (114-2) 0 53013 x 221-2 (425-1) C 51101 m
57225
514-2 (114-2) C 53013 x 521 -.2: (125) C 52045 m
(106-1) 0 50030 x 0 P
(1074) C 54005 z
(111-1) C 53007 x
(112-1) C 53008 x
x 2210-
(
C 5111h M
0 P
319-4,
(
2 ) c 19046 m
418.5 (220) C 520147 M
217-4,5 (418) C 19085 M
Ces No.
x 0 P
57226
51
57227
515-3 (115-1) C 53014 x
118-4 (
57228
516-1 (116-3) C 53018 x
0 P
57229
516-2 (116.2) C 53017 x
0 P
57230
7-8 C 19102 x 1194 C 19180 M
57231
7-6 C 19102 x 217-4,5 (418) C 19085 M
57232
7-5 C 19102 x 517-1,2 (117) C 19008 M
57233
15-s C 19110 x 318-1,2 (319) C 19043 m
57234
15-5 C 19110 x 110-8 c 19173 m
57235
23-s c 19118 x 217-1,2 (417) c 19050 m
57236
23-3 C 19118 x 110-S C 19173 m
57237
34-8 c 19123 x 121-4,5 (524) c 19061 m
57238
34-5 c 19123
57239
34.6 C 19123 x 108-5 C 19172 N
57240
35-8 C 19124 x 4174 (218) C 52046 m
57241
35-5 C 19124 x 108.6 c 19172 m
57242
36.6 C 19125 x 520-1,2 (123) c 19009 m
57243
36-s C 19125 x 124-5 C 19183 m
57244
41-8 c 19129 x
121-4,5 (224) C 19061 m
57245
41-s C 19129 x
420-4,5 (224) C 19039 m
57246
41-8 C 19129 x
520-1,2 (123) C 19009 N
57247
46.s c 19134 x
319-4,5 (322) c 19046 M
57248
46-s c 19134 x
517.1,2 (117) C 19008 m
57249
48-s I 19016 x
419-1,2 (221) C 19037 m
57250
48-5 1 19016 x 124-s c 19183 m
(LI54) c 5301
) 1 190©5
x 221-1 (425-2) C 51114 M
21
Cross No
Mer",
57251
50.4 I 19137 x 1204,2 (23) C 19060 M
57252
58.8 C 19139 x 119S C 19180
57253
61..9 C 3.9142
57254
61.45 C 191142 x 521.2 (125) -C 520145
57255
614 C 19142 x 108.8 C 19172 M
57256
73-S C 19152 x 108.8 0 19172 M
57257
944 C 19164 x 119.-1,2 (521) C 19058 M
57258
94.8 C 19164 x 418..5 (220) C 520147 M
57259
94-8 C 19164 x 110.5 C 19173
57260
109.5 C 52033 x 0 P
57261
139-5 C 52036 x
57262
1138.8 C 19200 x 521-2 (125) C 520135
Note:
M
x U9.145 (520) C 1907 M
21
14
oP
M
Revised breeding block numbers listed first
and old numbers listed secorrk.
).
Not
au*
mildew
soar
mildew
semi
rich
Not
mildew
no
mildew
no
off)
mildew
mildew
mildew
mildew
no
(low
vigor,
lupulin),
most,
no
mildew
no
no
no
cones,
type,
plant,
mildew
no
mildew
some
mildew
no
late,
sweet, cones,
mildew
no
susceptible
mildew
seeded,
rich,
vigor, vigor, vigor,
poor
good
Good
Fair Good
Very
vigor,
sweet,
plant,
Young Late,Fuggles Small Good Mild Small
plant, small
mild
(somewhat
rich),
(looks
late
Tesoro
Fair
vigor,
fairly
rich
(emoet),
vigor,
fair
!tussles
type,
vigers
strong
(plea
hop,
Geed Fair
fertile
female
mildew
some
mildew
some
Leafless,
rich
sweet),
and type,
male
Fgles
plant,
'Young
Hermaphroditic,
mildew
no
Late,
M
705 708 720 812 809 904
55125 55042 54039 55048 54033 55055 505854049 55058 54066 55083 550885096 54076 55104
m
if
CCCGCC
53091. 5500k 55014 53211 5503655039
C CC C0 C C C 0 C c C G
322 318 3n
nursery:
1956
well
down
hopped
not
cone,
long
cone
small
vine
red
shatters,
cones,
large
cones,
prop
high
Med. Mild,
aroma, strong,
Med.
set
good
late,
Sweet,
appearance
nice
vigor,
good
Very
vigor
much
not
cones
good
set,
small,
cone, dark
pointed
long
sweet,
cones
tight
set
good
cones
dark
vigor,
good
cones
small
cones,
prop.
high
arms,
long
aroma, strong,
Med. Mild, Med. Med.
aroma, aroma,
Strong, Med.
well
down
hopped
not
cones,
small
male
vigorous
Sweet, Good
M
vigor
much
not
set
large
cones,
good
seedless,
cone,
compact
aroma, mild,
vigor
much
not
well
down
hopped
shatters,
cones,
aroma,
large
cone,
ragged
strong,
set
vigor
poor
shatter
not
very
seedless,
does
cone,
tight
Med. Mod. Rich, Med. good Large Ragged,
CC
56020 56021
M
C CC CC C C C C C C
CC
56003 56004 56005 56006 56007 56008 56009 56010 56011 56012 56013 56014 56015 56016 56017 56018 56019
CCCC
ter
promising lines for
possible to obtain ac
to dsmny
XS
to wvleatimn of re
field. The disease =mossy provides eonditiens favorable for clergy
mildew development in spite of the weather. An overhead mist spra system
with automatic humidistat is installed over an area where approximately 200
individual plants can be tested in any one year.
The nursery area contains
a scattering of mildew susceptible varieties around and throughout to provide
for inoculum and for maintenance of mildew.
Testing Procedures
Selected lines were plan
the nursery area in 1955 and
1956.
These included selected individuals from the 1953 and 1955 bulk plantings
and 2 or 3 plants each of lines in the Oervallis-Prosser yield
trial.
On
May 21, 1957 all plants were uniformly inoculated with a downy mildew
spore
suspension.
At that time the nursery area already contained a large amount
of natural infection,
Inoculation was made during a
for infection were good
period when conditions
Disease development was rapid and severe.
Results:
On May 31 and again on July 6, each plant was examined and rated
for mildew severity.
of the plants.
The table below shown mildew rating and disposition
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
141
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1-17
1.18
L
0
3
3
S no new
L
H
S
3
$
14
$
3
3
8
S
S
14
o
L
S
8
1 -19
1.20
o
**1.22
1-23
1.24
1.25
2.1
2.2
2
2.5
2.6
S
2-,
2.10
2.11
S
S
S
Malaria:
S
2.3.2
L
2.13
S
2.7
2.$
2.111
S
3
3
3
24
2.15
2.16
2.17
2.18
2.19
2-20
2.21
2.22
2-24
2-25
ting key:
missing hill
0 0 no mildew
L
some
light
nildew
infection
moderate mildew
1 to 3 spikes
severe mildew - 3 or more spikes
1.23.
L.C.
3
I
02 03 0
0 tn on $4 WI
to to 0 X 8-1
1 0, 0
u,
01 02 02 00 04 1 i0doila,X
X .4
$
160 10 1«ibGaOa 001000
SO WOO X 0% 0 00 WS 00
QA 01
A
0
0
111
41111
A ctZ
P4.41
I u
a siN
LA
'LA
II 0 O 0, o,
1.11
0 Pi cm en
IA
IC u) p) NC to
3331111
1A 1A
%AN° tb-1110
1
PC 0 al I 0 1 0 I a* 0 /IC to IC 0 NC NC NC 1
C *2 115 NC tra GO
LA
I i7 1 u3 m
4.)
+
I
+
1
Cr:14
070301
01
1
0
(41)
1
1
1
lEi
1
1
I A
I co 1 to
c7,
en-4141
121
Sc') Sc') I X
124
r4
77
1111U
014 t":, OS
r4 r4 Cs1
1 c ua 03 U3 01 X 03 1 03
I 03 03 va GO 05 A 03
co co co co co co co co 23
1
rr
co A» 0 1 zg 01 u)
fa 1 co co
N4 I-40
co 0 co ao co U3 X U3 01 X co
(A ea ter
ul co
t- TVA
14- I's t--1.-
E
co co En f
y
HH.
rl
1
g
g CD g 0
co 1 PC e4
PC el I
C0 CO
g tn g ©O m tn
ull
0) 1 0 0 c) cp co I C)
CI
SEE
co 0 g
coOcnowwww0m00c010t,
H
1.4
co co co g
warn e w3wcsO 0
H
rsw 1.-zrto
0 CI
EUEZVVVPCN%wr
NO.AWNHt-41.JH
I
co-ca co I
tor?
HH
11.-ttw
0(401 wt w 1 C+Zw 10
l0.0-
W.15
III HHH
HHH
H t=tH
WAR)
v,p-wwi..0mrtzpv4)
-4
ror-1001tr-1400V11:6=1-11;114gjar40
H
1
iid)
t-4 CONCUll LO
;r2
RV
1.4
1 0 1 ts t-' S
1
.xc
02 CA CAI
0 0 0 'A 0 ri
1
omit,
ius
col iatsce
W$ CAUlt-640)1 (C101 I WS CI:It-41000
Co i CO 0 0 Mg W I ri 1 L-4 1
1.4
H CI CI ba
ItiLLP4P41t4±ga
1.J 0 No CD
4^9.0
WWI 7.16
t-1 AL-4 I
t-4001100001=A1001 rig 1/ 0110 A
NN
PZISZ
Ailth44011614tr.&14V0101 &ALL'
GC
Aspum
S
0
1111906TO
SKI I-Let
9K1
L-CT
9-6I
64T
'On
0
7
1,190610
rt-o:
T-5£t
CT-CT
On
at-CT wo906T0
IT
Oa-CT
0
0
7
as
61T
0
X
0'7
S
s
a.
to
Ta-CT
am.
ta-CT
f2-CT Bstla
Sa-CT
IT
7
a
51-CT
61-CT
7
7
11500,611
0T-CT HtOttm©
trr-ct
-EtSt
5
7
7
0'7
eis
Ulm
TV=
dungy
Tommatpoine Individual* trsra selected for farther tooting oa the
their resist a to dewy eilden Disease development in the
re that many suseeptible plants more oemplately debilitatot
out sharply in 001198.4.1101. to
of natural inoculmm
for disease development provided conditions for
kith
od doe mildew resistance
pollinated swarm were
evelnated for dew
its (1,56 &Wart SP,
greemheuse eereening test Previous
risiatanoe
3) a inn
tid that most of the mildew OuSesptible
*could be elielnated from further testing by creenkouse.ineOulation
mild** and that differences in degree f sssoeptibility existed
both amenteresses and among the individual' within certain crosses. The
same general premium were followed in 1957 as in 1956
Procedures
Seed from the 1956 tresses was germinated and seedlings planted in
flats in the usual way by S. N. Brooks.
When seedlings were 1041 weeks
old they were heavily inoculated with downy mildew spores on April 25, thin
inoculated again May 2 and May 10.
Xnessulum consisted of sporangia collected
from 6 different varieties or lines of hops to include possible different
races of mildew.
Sources of inoculum came from Early Clusters, Late ClUsters,
1281, 18.8 and 2 selections in the disease nursery.
Spore suspensions were prepared by washing systemically infected
"spikes" then filtering to remove the larger particles
debris.
of soil and plant
Inoculation was accomplished with an electrically powered paint
sprayer operating at 20 pounds pressure.
Twenty milliliters of 'vitro=
spore suspension were applied to the undersides of the leaves of seedlings
in each nat. Humid conditions were maintained by covering the seedlings
with several layers of cheesecloth saturated frequently with water,
Good infection was obtained and disease development was satisfactory,
but not as rapid or severe as in the 1956 test.
plants was made May 21 to May 25.
Selection for resistant
The number of progeny from each cross
was necorded. A record wasymads of the number of plants becoming
tar
severe disease.
Nasal mit
was uniform and die,aso dove
it was apparent that differences le seserptibility
espy.
In contrast to the-1956 test, many caS00 ef
escape or immunity of individual seedlings were Obserftd.
It was apparent,
however, that differences in degree of susceptibilityoxisted both among.
crosses and among individuals within certain crosses.
The table below shows
the reaction of seedling *loathe 1956 dresses to downy mildew.
Mildew Severity Rat
Cress
Number
1p.OP
12.OP
13
14
progeny
tested
388
459
376
28
30
245
480
152
335
92
29
87
15OP
22-OP
23
24.0P
30OP
32-0P
33
;6
35
37
42.0p
109
311
68
412
79
No. progeny
systemically
infected
23
is
9
Per cent
systemis
infection
Mildew
severity
rating
3
3
2
1.5
2
11
4.1
2.9
3
1.2
10
2
1.3
2.5
2.
2.5
4.3
0.0
0.9
0.3
4.4
5.7
7.1
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2.2
2.5
3
3
3
3
2.1
3
4
0
1
1
3
4
3
0
2
91
297
9
41-01)
4
135
43
7
142
44
4
49-OP
383
0
50-OP
39
3
44
58
2
204
51OP
* Based on a scale of 0 = none, 1
disease development.
2.9
4.9
1.0
6.8
.98
kept
11
6
0
15
10
a
5
7
7
0
2
5
1
1
5
3
5
2
0
7
4
4
2
3
3
light, 2 = moderate and 3
5
severe
tt0412
0
9
ta
do-$
a
L
J00
9t
J0"6t
Jabal
dPla
JO-La
003
9LT
gag
ect
40-0C
331
J0-91
;Pt
ao-a5
CS
cup-16
Lin
c10-051
ao-tiSt
c10-6t11
C
a
31%
cro-tiC
ao-SIT
a0-IC
9
0
00
193
ua
901C
ati
IS3
Let
firt
ICT
L
trE
C
at
t
9
1
0
0
o
ti
9
S
0
C9T
L6
S
ati
1
0
0
do-iLl
d0-eLT
d0-09I
tits
ara
at
'Ti
Ca
LCa
1
tat
ts
/1
to
9ra
a
6at
0
c10-50a
ao-Loa
a0-60a
VET
n
Qua
IT
cro-Cta
cgrL6
(10-45a
9
atiZ
cm-LS?
oca
cio-Z9T
Sat
g9t
ao-tiet
a to
ao-954
9e1
S0a
do-gra
a0-151
aSt
do-1ST
0
6
t
tit
t
tt
16
6
c
gEa
ct
Sta
oCt
9aa
4
C
91
ar0
rz
S't
WO
0400
oiio
tit tr
0C
t
tt
(10-0LT
S't
LI
CET
L9t
rt
SIT
.00
rt
Tel
9.0
951
651
191
ti91
0
6
0
Lit
0
t1
c
lit
CM
6I
0°0
0C
060
£'9
MT
3
a Sm
C
4
a
a
a
a
c
C
a
C
a
rz
t
a
5"a
a S'
a"
a
a
t
c
a
000
S
tSep
01
e5
9S
6L0
a
a
a
9.9
££
E 6*
fro
ati
tZ
C
5.3
(*it
6a
tt
a
a
is
Sec
040
000
9
C
a
a
a
C
tl
S
a
a 5'
0
9
a
C
a
c
a
t
Sec
a 5'
C
S'g
C
a
t
t
titrl
c
Cc
a
a
t
S'S
C
5
61
£a
a9
a
a S'
E
1.
a
UN
4
e411
0
pr4.411uNle--g
114 *4 04
el
641
tb1
MM
*
Ci
°0 et rc 0_,
,40m.orric-mN0-1(voreNIAHONO
111
N NOINMNMNMM01MNNNMH
01
50,911.41
04
12A
Agr4
we.sg
422."
7
ss-teel
%Am'AVP
codsielaHRWeatmss
F1i-iNNPN1-4
CY.W.0
44
r4
r-m.t).*ftr-spor.4.ovoe.m000%omcNo.mmeto"omr.u.00
me4g0404m.40m0.-46201.4-1'm
gill
ft
.4.011AMMMN.,44-100MCOMMO%NdOiNNIMMWM0J MMM-4M.*WO%
N
O
Ao
M0410.
11-ft.1' mM4rommmmmom
ctM
%ALA
MNt.-1,0ANONMONN-11AM.aN
IA LA
tilt %040NOMOAMIA
IA
WWW04NMI4MI4MftriatiNIWNHeNINMCMCMCMOIMCVNWOJMOaNC4CliM
8"1
0%.11
er'b
RIgOWR2
Ntr
1;1=0"
04
MHM04014-NMMMN-7..../NMIN
.0
0 ot
Cit
c c © 'I 1
OMNWOOCKOCIMOHM-40MM0000111e-MONNNMMt-M-1
LO4
Cri411
Nftw
mpiocymt-,
ONO MA.41,-000gONP.-04M.40\MW
Cf
'*4143%5pArAl
04O4A.NN
MMMMNr4
NMWNNN
7
9
12
2
2
2140
222
21].
130
29
30
37
26
115
235
123
120t
111.44.0P
112.0P
118.0P
No. crones
187
4.0
5/4
14
0
6*9
0,0
1
2.7
3
5
8
4.3
1.4
2,
2
2
2
3
2
3
Total plants
31,357
Discussion and conclusions*
From the data in the table above there are apparent differences
in susceptibility of progeny of certain crosses to systemic infection.
Resistance to systemic infection is more important from a field resistance
standpoint than any other type.
Degree of systemic infection ranged from
0 to 24 per cent among progeny from 187 crosses.
Certain crosses showed
good overall mildew resistance, and several, such as cross Ne. 114, shoved
both resistance and vigor.
Approximately azif seedlings were selected for field planting.
From these, desirable agronomic types will be selected and placed in the
disease nursery for further evaluation.
As a result of the 1956 mildew screening program 363 seedling
were selected from among about 8,000 tested.
These were observed during
the 1957 season. Twenty-six, or about 7 per cent, became infected with
mildew but only two were severely affected. At the same time, susceptible
varieties in the yard were from 50 to 80 per cent infected, on a hill count
basis* thesi it 'Nom that the vesebeiss serissing preps= is eliminating
nest of the downy nos suseeptibie plants readting in effieineler at the
breeding Prevail*
At Corvallis data we
on yield, relative
alpha -acid, oil content, and sidearm length.
Because of missing and young
hills in the quality trial at Corvallis us attempt was made to provide
statistical analysis for alpha-acid and oil content.
At Prosier data were obtained on yield, alpha -acid and oil content.
Tield data are not available at this writing and will not be included in
this report.
It is a matter of interest that harvesting at Prosser was done
with the mechanical experimental picker developed by the Irrigation
Experiment Station.
A table follow which summarises the most important information
obtained on these lines in 1957.
Additional agronomic data and brewer
evaluation on these and other lines are contained in the Experimental Yield
Trial section under GRe5-1 Additional chemical quality data are given in
sections A, B and C of this report under CReS -5.
241
Mon
MP.
2
00019205 aka 1614
10k.
019123
045
1500 1340
32
Late
Good
3.47
1044
1084
(W)079213 2760 20140
33
Mod.
turd
307 1.04 3.99 0.76
(W)019138
1940 1850
32
Modelato
109-I
019145 2100 1600
30
Mod.
Gem
112 -I
(0)019215 2680 1850
36
Late
Good
5.95 1,06
123-1
019081 2270 2270
37
Mod,
Geed
6.33 0.72 6.70 0.91
124
019086 1650 1570
33
Mod
Good
3.98 0.84 2.90 0.53
127 -I
019108
1140 1060
21
Med.
132 -I
019136
1920 1520
33
Med.
Geed
3.51
1354(000019151 1714 1310
29
Med.lats
Good
2.38 1.20 2.45 0.60
138-I
1290 1320
25
Med.
Geed
5.47 0.69 4.91 0090
139-I 00019195 1980 1470
35
Late
Good
3.78 0.60 3.63 0.44
(0)019077 2160 1690
28
Med.late
Good
4.90 1.66 2.35 0.58
019202
114144
Mean
1,SD 5%
CV (%)
1940 1600
690 1480
21
20
4.211
2.44 0.49
0.70 5.52 1.22
6,30 1.13 631
1.314
5.72 1.25 3.54 0.79
0.0
3.00 0.31
4.00 0,75
30.14
7
11.63 P. /6
30
106
Data supplied by S. T. Likens.
Lines slated for off - station testing in Oregon.
Lines slated for off-station testing
1.148
Washington.
12«
MAI owe loser yialiing thon Late
.*3
lino* 1044, 127.01, 138-I and
Late Clusters. Sins lines require it
yield.
of t
muds=
third yetr in Oregon, and under mildew
b
r.
free condition*
year a few of the
Late Clusters reaches its
It is anticipated that by next
Clusters in yield.
$
With regard to date of mat
none of the lines were as early
as Tuggle'. Most of them were medium between Fuggles and Late Cltsters,
however 103-I, 104, 112.4 and 139.4 appeared to be somewhat later than
Late Clusters. Maturity is difficult to determine and these observations
are subject to modification.
The results on storage stability are of interest
discussion is given of this in section 065-5 part. C, however a few comments
should be made at this point.
In general most of the lines appeared to store
well based on one year's observation.
103-I deteriorated quite badly, but
it retained its original condition better than Brewer's Gold and Bullion,
two commercial varieties which are objectionable in this respect.
None of
the lines appeared to store as well as Late Clusters.
Significant differences in alpha-acid percentage and oil content
were indicated in the Prosser samples.
In general, both alpha-acid and oil
Corvallis samples of
were lower in the Prosser samples than they were in the
the same linos.
Ti 13. of high said sr low as
swot to be a *attar of- individual
prefereses among Minors and ne statement ssa be *ado at this time
whisk is bett
wen
Charaeterisatien of varieties for this oherastoristie
pry as alpha-acid
t.
It seems quits likely that
Tay as a basis of evaluation
4.4
4
rotative clonal material in
firms des in
a rasidemised.b10411:deaign.
27 ezporimentel lines represented a group of seleetions which
a
in 1950 out of stresses made in 1949. Although most of'thom
vire intermediate in maturity there was considerable:rangy for this'aharacter..
Jetts from mediun early to late (later than Late Clusters).
The trial has beep grown under irrigation and has received from
tiro. to four irrigations per season. Applications of W, P, and 2 fertilizers
have been made every year either by ringing the hills or by broadcsoil
application.
Attempts have been made to control insect and disease pests.
The overall cultural program on this trial has been carried out in a
manner consistent with good management practice*.
Experimental resultss
In 1957 data were obtained on yield and relative moisture loss in
drying.
The kiln-dried samples were subjected to organoleptie evaluation
by representatives of B.I.R.I. for the third consecutive year.
A summary of these results is given in the following table.
Further information on some of these lines is given in the
Corvallis- Prosser Yield Trial report and sections A, B
report
and C of CRe5-5
3.
Pages. nosy
SV
100
lax
tog
26.7
* Loo
3
k
5
6
mai
mum
23.1,
28.2
0,221
4.9
23.6
caslo500
0
7
2
2
0
1
0
0 Flavor
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
4
5
o
o
1211
2504
23.7
23.5
o
o
0
16* 1231
23.7
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
$
lakz
zoo'
*
264
23.3
1071
20.11
lOil
10* 109.1
3.1* 1121
12 1171
13 1181
114
019123
019222
243
(0)
23.6
247
came
15 1221
17* 12141
18 1251
19 1261
20* 1271
23.
1281
22 1301
23 1311
214* 1321
25* 13 51
26* 1381
27* 1391
28 1411
29* 1441
Mean
LSD (5%)
cv (%)
20.2
25.6
01920
019108
C19113(91)2
25.0
21.0
25.2
24.9
019134
21.3
019016
1560 1610 22.8
019136
2100 23.2
019151(91)
24.3
019202
26.7
019195
25.3
019204
23,8
019077(0)
2090 1970
520 330
18
20
1
1
0
2
2
1
off,
0 Off, woody aroma
0 Nice hap (5th best)
0 Strang, sweet
0 Bitter arena
1 Slightly. bitter
0 Slightly off, fair hop
0 Misty and bitter
o Off, bad
o Sweet, slightly bitter
0 Used hop (2nd best)
I Off, weedy
1 Slightly reedy and bitter
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
I
3
2
2
2
3
1
0
I
0
14
2
2
h
0
1
Off, slightly garlicky
Slightly off, sweet
Off, Weedy, bitter
Sweet, strong, bitter
Sweet and bitter
Off, strong
Sweet, chalky
Very good hop (Ist,best)
Off, strong, bad
Sweet, strong, grassy
Off, strong
Good hop (3rd best)
24,1
2 .2
6
-Entries in the Corvallis-Presser Yield Trial
off-station testing in Oregon and Wasktngton
(0,W) Entries slated for
respectively.
Sohwaiger (Anheuser-Busch)
Notes taken from comments made by Mr. Frank
*
y
Fuggles on the basis
Underlined yields are greater than that of
of the LSD (5%)
this trial
1957
slightly above the average for
*he fettr.yoar period tutus *do yield data has* boon obtained. Sidoific
differences la 71.
The range is yield
ty "sere J iCated in 1957
par
for %ha 210 entriOnt INS
low with a yield of 1200
sere. Twelve of
gh
acre, 126-1 was
with a yield of
arieties eutlieldidlnaglee on the basis of the
In
gniflcant differences 'were
Judieated for lines, replications, years
reps. x years and lines z
mire interactions. These data suggest that the lines yielded differently
fres each ether, that their perfersance was influenced by seasons, and that
the seasonal influence was not the same for all lines.
The data further
suggest that the replications yielded differently and were subject to seasonal
(probably cultural) variation from year to year.
Yields over the fenryear period ranged from 1520 lbs., for 1171
to 2690 lbs. per acre for 112.1, a range of 1170 lbs. per acre.
20 of the
entries appeared to out-yield Fuggles on the basis of the LSD.
The data on dry-down percentage probably indicate differences in
Some of the known earlier maturing lines had higher dry-down
maturity.
percentages than some of the known later maturing lines.
These values are
a reflection of the dry matter content of the hops at harvest time
and a
law value indicates more moisture loss than a high one.
Records have been kept on the number of replants (or missing hills)
during
the
past three years.
Late Clusters, 108 -I, 109 -I, 123, 127-1, and
139-1 appeared to have an unduly high amount of replants needed.
This may
be a reflection of the resistance to root die-out of these lines, however
neared t.
11114.1,
arit
Fogy's,
drew highlr
j
Ths obJeotima it this
greeeheame and field trials for t
1
so and to provide treitedlop sample* for chemical
studies.
-Investigatiens of this nature have been conducted periodically for several
year*
Previous work:
A large increase in the number of fungicidal chemicals u
has taken place the past few years.
21
Laboratory and gree
screening trials were conducted from 1949 to 1954 by G. R. 'Werner who went
on leave status April, 1955. During 1955 field trials were conducted with
promising materials*
As a result of data on disease control and residue
analyses, Federal Registration for the use of sineb was approved with a
tolerance of 60 parts per million.
Zineb is currently being used by hop
growers for downy mildew control, but is not entirely satisfactory because a
large number of applications are necessary to achieve good control when conditions are favorable for mildew*
During 1955, streptomycin was used experimentally in small scale
greenhouse and field tests.
It was found that streptomycin was absorbed
and translocated by hop plants, and that it was active against the downy
mildew fungus.
During 1956 comparisons were made in field texts of sineb and
streptomycin as cover sprays.
Streptomycin was slightly superior to sineb
but not effective enough to 4ustify its use as a cover spray because of the
higher cost of the antibiotic.
Another eaptribiaat
the
basis AM Milt
seednote au 1
of the 1957 tests.
d reeiltishidh, termed
fit; this experiment sprays Mt streetes
mein at cementratillue of 1.000 be 5000 pre me toluot to firma or
eradieato
internal systemic &Dewitt:We from infected sheets' and in sumer cases to
transform systestiesIly inflated shoots (spikes) to normal
ptomyoin dusts (Phytomycin) and sprays (t
healthy
vines.
trep) both at
1000 ppm, were applied at four different dates to the you growth at the
crown area of hop plants.
Plate consisted of 100 hills with 8 replications.
Sprays were applied at the rate of approximately 100 mis per hill or 20
gallons per acre. Dusts were applied at the rate of onehalf ounce per hill
or about 25 pounds per acre.
Both dusts and sprays were applied to thoroughly
oover all young growth arising from the crown.
Treatments were made on
A ril 23, 5 to 12 days after crown pruning; May 29, 5 days after the first
vine training; June 13, when vines were threefourths of the way to the
overhead wires; and June 30, when most vines were to the wires.
Results:
Data on incidence of systemic infection were taken 13 to 15
days after each treatment and are summarized in the table below.
The
earliest application (April 23) was distinctly superior to later applications.
Sprays Were greatly superior to dusts at all dates of application; however,
both sprays and dust; decreased disease significantly.
474
14.3
350.5
171.9
1464
214.9
2614
117.3
373.6
ISA
ligiChas
44.6
283.9
31 .9
78.?
83.1/
Spike count is the ran of 8 replications of 100 hills.
on and Conclusions
At the time the earliest treatment was made
many systemically
hoots (spikes) already were evident but sporulation had not yet
started. Young shoots which could definitely be recognised as spikes were
marked and observed for treatment effects.
Approximately 85 per cent of the
marked spikes were transformed to normal shoots in the April 23 spray treat want plots, while none were transformed in either dust treated or check plots.
All spray treatments inducted a mottled chlorosis of many of the treated leaves.
This effect has been observed as a streptomycin effect on plants and has
been explained as a streptomycin induced manganese deficiency by W. G. Rosen.
The greatest obstacle in obtaining satisfactory downy mildew
control by current protective fungicides is the high frequency of system
ically infected shoots and the persistence of such systemic infections as
sources of inoculum. When new shoots develop in the spring frois winter.
dormant buds on the perennial hop crown, many are already systemically
infected.
Such systemically infected shoots produce tremendous numbers o
spores which serve to spread the disease.
Infection by these spores results
in either local or systemic disease development.
Systemic disease develop
lunkolly results when ihisrisioasttie sten ter lest tissue is infected*
Thus, the phi` source of tneaulun for spread of Omer mildew in the
of the early esserging systeateally infected shoots.
Ira* *heir that systeade infection in
by the use of properly
Objeotires
procsor
r field trial, was con
ted in 1957 to compare four
oommerdial preparations of agricultural grads streptomycin for hop downy
mildew control and to test the value of glycerol in increasing the effective
nese of streptomycin.
AgriStrep (Merck & Co. 37% streptomycin sulfate),
Agrimycin 100 (Chan, Pfizer & Co., 15% streptomycin sulfate plus 1.5%
terramycrin), Phytomycin (Olin Mathieson Co., 20% streptomycin nitrate) and
Leder).* Streptomycin (American Cyanamid Co., 15% streptomycin sulfate) were
each applied as spray at 1000 and 2000 ppm streptomycin with and without the
addition of glycerol at a concentration of 1 per cent in the spray mixture.
Treatments were applied June
4 to 7 to four replications of plots
containing 10 diseased hills each. Data were taken on the number of
systemically infected shoots at the time of treatment and the number remaining
2 weeks after treatment.
Resultst
All formulations of streptomycin, at both concentrations, and both
with and without glycerol, significantly reduced disease incidence as shown
in the summary table below.
ocesperimm of four ferszeletiono of streptomycin at two 903111411 ntN
tic= with and without slyeerol for control of hop, downy mildew.
1. APIA
1%
.2
762
2,
AmrioStrops, 2000-0pm w. 15
.2
4.5
3.
Agrliatrep, 1000 ppm
1238
29.5
23.8
4.
Agri.8trep. 2000 ppm
5
21.8
17.2
5. Agrimycin 100, 100 and 10 ppt
IN 2 glycerol
118.8
3.2
2.7
Agriomycin 100, 200 and 20 ppm,
vs 1% glycerol
131.0
6.7
5.1
Acriomycin 100, 100 and 10 ppm
135.8
7.5
5.5
8.
Agri-mycin 100, 200 and 20 ppm
131.2
5.8
4.4
9.
Phytomycin 1000 ppm w. 1% glycerol
131.5
14.5
11A
10. Pkytowcin, 2000 ppm w. It glycerol
127.0
8.8
6.9
111.2
24.5
22.1
12. Phytomycin, 1000 ppm.
127.2
22.5
17.7
13. Lederle strap., 1000 ppm
w. 1% glycerol
124.5
7.5
6.0
14. Lederle strop., 2000 ppm
v. 1$ glycerol
124.5
2.5
2.0
15. Lederle strop., 1000 ppm
101.0
24.5
24.3
16. Lederle strop., 2000 ppm
124.2
27.8
22.3
17. 1% Glycerol in water
156.0
123.8
79.2
18.1% Glycerol in water
137.8
107.0
77.6
19. No treatment
134.5
'94.5
68,4
20. No treatment
112.2
82.0
73.0
11
Phylkummdmi, 1000 ppm
,
L.s.0. 5% .. 1,.64
4110111 of 4 replications of 10 diseased hills.
ks after treatment
52L.
Altera. t. lmolatious of
troptoopois poured ti be oqoally
o teatime at either 1000 `or 2000 ppmd This is not in agreement with earlier
(1956 report pp. 72'43) in which inereased eeseentratien of strop..
temysin resulted in increased disease *entail. We explanation for this
diserepancy is apparent.
The addition of glycerol to the spray mixture appeared to increase
the effectiveness of AgriStreps Pbytomgrein,
.
Lederle Streptomycin
but did not increase the effectiveness of Agrimpin 100.
Agrimycin 100,
without glycerol was as effective as AgrimStrepo Phytomycin and Lederle
Streptomycin with glycerol.
Since glycerol has been reported to increase
the absorption of streptomycin by plants, the results appear consistent
except in the case of Agrimycin 100. An inquiry was made to the manufacturers of Agrimycin and they stated that Agrimycin 100 contained an optima
amount of an adjuvent which would explain the results.
Whether the other
formulations of streptomycin contain a similar adjuvant was not determined,
erimet No.
Objectives and ?roc
An experina nt conducted in the summer of 1956 (see 1956 report
p. 71) indicated that the antibiotic griseofulvin might be of value in
eliminating systemic downy mildew infection from hops.
This experiment will
be briefli reviewed here because of Observations made in the spring of 1957
which indicated carry-over effects of griseofulvin on downy mildew.
In the 1956 experiment griseofulvin in water suspension at 500
and 1000 ppm was used to soak drench downy mildew infected hills
on Jul 8
Approximately one pint of antibiotic mixture was used per hill.
Twenty-
diseased hills In 3
1111431114
had 141 ef
infested wi
shocked, while an adjacent
,dompy mildew when the new
growth fret appeared in the spring. This observation suggested possible
carry-ever effect, of griseofalvin4
A test-was initiated in 1957 to determine if griseotalvin would
eliminate systemic downy mildew fra infected sheets and to decarry -saver effects observed in the 1956 test were due to chance,
956 test was not a randomised and replicated trial.
Oriseofulvin was dissolved in dimothyl formamide and suspended
in water at a concentration of 1000 ppm of the antibiotic.
Sprays were then
applied to the arm area and basal growth of hops in plots consisting of 48
hills with 6 replications.
Treatments were made on 4 different dates,
May 23, June 18, August 18 and Septeaher 20, 1957.
The exact location of
all infected hills in each plot was tabulated.
Oriseofulvin at 1000 ppm did not appear to be as effective as
in at 1000 ppm on the basis of ability to arrest or eradicate
systemic infection.
Very few cases were noted where infected shoots were
transformed to healthy vines. Although griseofulvin and streptomycin were
not compared directly in this experiment, an adjacent experiment using
streptomycin at the same rate and concentration was available for comparison.
Griseofulvin reduced downy mildew infection as shown in the
summary table below for dates 1 and 2.
V
VI
63
191
$
Calseefkilvin
Al
Check
No quantitative data were taken for the August And
to the
treatments
tember/due
late summer disappearance of the disease. Data will be taken
in the spring of 19S8 to determine any possible carry over effects.
Discussion and Conclusions*
Considerable work has been done in England by Brian and. others on
the
to ofIriseofulvin on fungi.
Results of their experiments show that
grilse:ataxia is not active against the Phyeomycete class of fungi, which
would include downy mildews. Since griseofulvin is known to be absorbed
and translocated by plants, the nature of its action against hop downy
mildew could be the result of its effect on the plant rather than on the
fungus directly.
This possibility warrants further investigation because
such effects are little known or understood.
That griseefulvin did have an effect on the incidence of downy
mildew is clearly shown in the table above.
Griseofulvin does net, however,
&Al Tyr***
A trial nu establiaboi in 1956 in Antsanian SS earenin inn olsonsinal
taint* .wanlat ronbmis the anon* of dindout eased by root and. erns rots
and naterials are given in more detail on nits 77 et OP 1956
Effect of four
survival and
Average plot *
NO. of 40 plants
suryiving
Average weight
lbs) per vine
Chloropierin
38
3.90
118.7
Vapam
37
3.05
86.2
nylons
37
3.97
1160
Terraeler
38
3.95
100.4
Cheek
40
3.92
1262
might (2be)
Averages are frma four replicetious.
tatistioal analysis revealed no significant differences among
for either weight per vine or total plot weights. This trial
is probably met located in an area vbero root dis.out is not sufficient
to obtain treatment differences.
Survival data will be obtained in the
ring of 1958 and if differences are not indicated the experiment will be
dropped from the current location.
Dow
r
mere severs axing the 190 gremiag
it has been for several years. In two yards of highly susceptible Late
80 to 90 pc
cent of the hills carried opted, inieotion
yards *feather resistant Fugels
ibis varieties Bullion and Breve
mildly affected.
The moderately sumooPt-
Odd were net badly damaged
by stlAs.
principally bemuse of vigorous control programs by the growers
Root die-eut was about normal
1 to
5 per cent in 4
yards
chocked
Verticillium wilt was found in another location near Indepsndenee,
Oregon in 1957.
This was on the Mike Walker Farm.
The planting consisted
of Bullion hops with scattered hills of Fuggles throughout.
Fuggles were
showing severe wilt symptoms when the planting was observed in early August.
Bullion hops were not showing any visible disease symptoms even when adjacent
to dying Fuggles.
Isolations were made from both Fuggles and. Bunions.
Verticillium albe-atram was recovered from roots of both varieties and
from the stems of niggles but not from the stems of Bullion. A thorough
check of the infested area indicated that Bullion hope were tolerant to the
disease whereas Fuggles were susceptible and badly damaged.
Washington:
Downy mildew was severe in many Yakima Valley hop yards early in
the growing season.
The disease is prevalent only in the spring and
disappears with the advent of hot dry weather characteristic of the summer
growing season in that area.
All varieties of hops grown in the Yakima Valley
ry susceptible to downy mildew. The disease has increased considerably
the past few years, and appears to be contributing substantially to root
die-out.
Systemic crown infection is common and is the principal means by
conducted by t Prireser
INW60111101T fif MD. 414r4=11011
tionteues Rua= TO 8 itif.1410,Gt D1BE,
antaninows 911 t
t
shimmer
CVO mmonceac
al, 22)
(0165341
Ch lunar 1. geSIMPIP
4
T
1952. pp. 94.0U7. Seed Derain& on
pp. 121.12114,
ratbods for Increasing Vegetative Prepagation.
pp. 123430. Uss of Chemicals for Basal Stripping and Sucksring.
1951. pp. 219420. Methods for Inersaming Vegetative Propagation
pp. 22141ti. Use of Chanteals for Basal. Stripping and Suoksring.
pp, 7046. Methods of Clonal Propagation.
pp. T742 Teen age's Relative to Maintaining
Dower
Clreanhouse.
8045
)thuds at Clonal Propagation.
pp. 8440. Streptoswein Absorption, Trazialeoation
Assay Teshnigneo.
A Mrlss of
Fifty microgram of strop
lanolin paste per plant.
rtes at loaves and other plant
36 h8 and 72 hours 7i
collected at 1/2, 1, 2,,h, 8
sys after appliestion tad immsdiirtsly quick frown at .2
Pioassays for streptomycin is oxtractod plant sap Imre conducted as Oescribod
report pp. 86.90. Samples wore also osllootod at dlfferent
the point of application.
Tao forms of the antibiotic core
nitrate and streptomycin sulfate.
?eaMI
Summary data on amount of streptomycin
of translooation are proacotod in the followingtabloss
Madame Coneentratioa at s
Leaves at Varying Distanoes tram
Table 2.
awls
la)
Ties rociairod to reach
sax seae.iboors
Um)
B
is
8
20
30
40
60
2)
24
Tab la 3.
4 below
8 below
4 stets
10 above
20 above
X) above
40 above
60 above
74
74
10.12 "
1144 "
11446 "
15.20
142
83
69
16
13
12
24 ppm. and te 1.2
watitr12.dre.
differemt heights *eye the eeerees the
in the lowest losses sr
tended to
inereased op to loot not ineludimi the
time required tar atcPtelVeint* rush
format diet/mem from the antibiotic
at leaves and t growing tiika
lm a shorter time.
RAte of tr
was rapid in
a alter
within 25 to 20
.
It wan
application in the tips
distance of 74 centimeter* free the source.
Both streptomycin sulfate and nitrate acted surly witty reapeet
to absorption and tranolosation
by
hop plants.
The nest lozical stops w1/1 be I. determines
(a)
What oonoontration of otreptomytin is required In the tiammoto arrest or
eliminate
(b)
dowry ?andel'? intsetirn.
What conoontration io required in the plant to prevent downy mildew
infection.
$il
eendneted en hoe in H.psr
4200 as early as 1910. These
irrigations malticatieas
member of mss per pints f
trials, stripping aid sackerings
said pruning, time f Wise. amd the use of various sever crops. Mew of theme
studios sere of a prolimimulrlattare and were complete information is
needed.
dines there are interselationshipe between field practice and
quality or between field practise and disease factors, this Use prejoet
neeessarily entails the work of specialists in various fields. rer
that
reason nosh of the work reported in this seat on has been obtained by cooperative
effort of mere than one investigator.
In 1957 the following studies were
stripping and suobrithg ztady.
2.
3,
'motility experiment.
Hei,ght of stripping study.
Date and erverity of pruning trial.
5. A nee series of cultural studies on an
variety of hope.
smskibuwed3
1
Anneal Reports pegs 82.
of experiments
To be discontinued
LA its
present fora after one
(21 &stoat p.r
Ti. sprayings were made during the season. One
Jump 7 when tha hops veva approx3mate/7 eight fest high. There was
amount of basal growth at that time. A seemed application was
5 at whisk tine the hops were flowering. Approximately 35
gallons at spray per acre were required on June 7* but scar
this amount was needed on July 5.
Visual ratings ware mad* on July 5 and July
ntal_flssultrt
at less than
3
32.6
36.6
6
314.6
360
7
33.6
8
36.18
9
0430
.0.
314
3,
369
TAD (5%)
NB
CV (%)
2.513
be
37.1
3
6.22
6.0k nem.
3.5
646 light
2.8
4.315 medgrats 2
wan
Data supplied by
1
7
1.0
431 1
1
1.0
all 1 3..0
1
7.5
64
2.0
30.3
1.0
all 1 1.2
5.96
6.7
10
5. T WM**
at
1 is oqhal to hand Oita' a rating of 10 is equal to ne
Rating
treatment. Data thrashed by W. R. Furtiok.
ability wars indicated in 1957
the
gr to bo any differenc* in alphomesid
to year observations may indicate ne &trim
manta' effects of
nts cumulative affects are the most important
in this study. Final
Brill be based on a summary of several
individual year's results.
at 5 lbs. actual per 100
as hand stripping
regard to snekering
at the hi
rate early is the
f growth at the base.
b
h
After the
athent with endothal at the 5 lb.
satisfactory
S104369 at the rates used in this study
as effective as
endothal Rates of this material up to 3 pounds actual did not control sucker
growth completely.
some stager vine in:gry was apparent with this chemise',
at the highest rates.
° n the basis of the
results fry floc Lost tree Yew it aeuld
appear that ndothal has shown the most promise of any of the cheeisals
studied for chemical stripping and suckering of bops. An additional year's
data shooid supply adequate evidence for a decision regarding the use of this
material as recommended fare practice.
in yields obtained
The development of improved
fertility prude** maybe effective in
helping mum
ty levels in Oregon*
the addittoas of fertiliser
influenead:by irrigation
results mould be expected ter hops, but experimental data
are lacking*
It has been estimated that the net irrigation requirement for hops
grown in the Willamette Valley is 13 inches per seamen. The installation of
the irrigation system= the experimental yard in 1939 was estimated to have
caused s 20 increase in hop yields*
Data from previous fertiliser trials on hops are inconsistent
regarding the effects of fertiliser applications on quality. Yield
responses
have
obtained primarily by applications of nitrogen fertilisers*
Gore tins anodises
This experiment is cooperative among the Crops Research Division
A.R.S., and the departments of Yarn Drops, Soils, and Agricultural Chemistry,
of Oregon State College* The Brewing Industries Research Institute provides
f 7 x 4 hill plots and the sebotreatmelts
z4
kill plots. Border revs mere planted amend the main plots
r.lapping of irrigation treatments.
The treatments mere designs**, fellows
irrigation.
irrigation.
A.
Lys moisture, no
B.
One irrigation at initial
burring.
One irrigation at initial coning.
4. High moistures OAXLIMM tension 0.8 atm.
E. Medium moisture maxima tension 2.0 ate.
atnents
fertility's
0
1
67
133
2
3
240
67
5
6
133
133
7
TS
Oenparisees 182#3,k)
(2,3,5,6)
(2,3,5,6)
tee
sibplet
(3,7)
fertility treatment 4, in e
of the main irrigation
pieteAls D and g see selected for moisture study and control.
Four gypsum
stakes mere installed in each of these supolots by which soil moisture tension
as
at depths at 6# 14# sot 24. tiedtes oath.
rem* tree the setplet lath*
la the tep
7
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
Treats C I
4.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
II
IV
Treat. A
I
Ii
III
IV
240
2.00
240
2.10
2.64
2.36
2.53
2
2.56
2.00
2
Treat, S
II
zu
50
50
50
50
3.21
.20
3.35
3.35
3.30
.63
4.55
6.65
6.64
6.66
6.51
3.20
plated e
it bask to field
by means o
type sprinkler pips lying on the ground.
Fertilisers were applied in earl r ep
the fora of a ring around each hill followed by disoing.
lash Nperfoorsiall
7
I3
59
g6.
223 224
II
227
D2 D1 D6 D
2 8 6 1 k B1
22
231
232 233 234
B 7 A7 A5 A3
Al A2 A6
Big B6 a5 DI B2 B3 B 705010 6
4030702
2
EIL-12, 214
129 130 131 132 133 134
1D7 D6 D2 D3 01 05
115 116 117
118
119
120
C5 Gig 07 C
102 14
3.
4.
5.
6.
135 201 202
203 204 205 206 207
A2 Al AS A7 A6 A3
122
123
124 125 126 127
G 6 E3 L6 F.7
2
110
MAIN PLOTS
Ghooksbow
B. One irrigation a
C. One irrigation at icy
O. High moisture, 0.8 atm.
E. Medium moisture, 2 atm.
SUB
1.
2.
215 216 217 215 219 220 221
gale%
burring,
coning,
1
Plots with stake*
installed. Four
stakes per plot, 1
foot radius from each
plant and All located
on west side of plant.
670 X or .29# 1330 ammonium nitrate per hill.
1330 X or .59# (267 g) ammonium nitrate per hill.
200# N or NW (400 g) ammonium nitrate per hill.
75# P205 or 4125# (112 g) treble super phosphate per hill.
75# 120 or .182 (84 g) lariate of potash per hill.
7.
Four replications of 28hill plots
Sub plots are h. hills.
tisa of sell misters tension deteradastiossi a sell variability elven
on &tint during *Loh the plaids meld got better established. Although
oonsidershIs bosisgrened re* of this nature had to be dens, sew rsleirent
remelts were ebtained
Harvest weights were recorded on three replisations, and alphasesid
tions WA node en the samples fres two replications. In addition
data sone information was gained regarding the soil moisture use
of a twoyear old hap plant. These results are presented in the
graphs and tables.
Onzirt
Lingsrtumowte crs
arlf
nottiruy ;o oolzoistik
wank Jo
A
ra
69
is ppromirqdre soihrwoo.zod
es
Y.0
1.0
30
Juno
3
to applications of 67 or mere lbs. of nitrogen
to D and 0, were analysed
indicated for both irrigation treat -
The
nation response appeared to be
taunt.
In addition, there appeared
n.
The average percentages were rather erratic
to fort
however most of the treatments receiving nitrogen =wedged the nor nitrogen
treatment in this respect.
Although the results were obtained on relatively. young plants which
avers net
completely established, there vas evidenee that they extracted
moisture vertically to a depth of five feet and radially to a distance of
over three and once -half feet in the upper 18 inches of soil.
As these plants
became older it is expected that a better picture of the volume of soil from
whiob hops use water will be obtained.
respect to
vide variation in graver
Any growers de not strip at all. Others strip the basal
to heights ranging from one u0 to five or six feet.
while to investigate the effects of stripping on
ras stripped to hei.,ghts tip to eight
feet.
There appeared to be no streets on yield based on the single year's
observation.
Procedure
the tr is
wee 1,
i
t in a randrnf i zed block design
replications. The site of the plots was 1 x 5 hills.
of tour'
The hops mere
rown on
a 14 ft. trellis.
Treatment oonsisted of a tripping the lover portions of the visa to
heighlrs of 1.5
3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 feet above ground lsvele
One treatment
was left as a *heck which was not stripped. and stripping was done at
intervals rhen normal development of the plants indicated that stripping was
needed.
A total of three strippings were made during the season,
Other cultural practices were identical to those normally dons
on the other production plots.
It
(same as April in this
October is sold, training up, to four
id
ea
It has been Arend that ?toggles prodnoes a
the
chosen for training are these which appear between
weeks after
it starts shooting in New Zealand*
haggles is trained in England lathe first
part of Mays but it is ready for training in gem 7ealand by October ID
(April 10).
Pulling off the earl, appearing vines and training the
ones mums the vines start their development
seder
later
conditions of length of day
more similar to such oon itions in England
Perhaps the ratio of da -length to derby
with
and without
Ter,
as well as the acoumulative temperature effects prevalent after the
primardia start to develop influence the vigor, of the vines which arise tram
t en. Such
eenditions mulct
vary from year to year.
No differences in alpha acid were indicated in
1957 nor
11111 1956.
nitteinness in sidsaien length were signifleant again in 1,957.
of last 'oar in that the ranking tem
aims indication
that later Plods(
1* 1954 the no prone treatment
ta the Unseat sidearm
particular treatment apparently
va the lever portions at t
tines,
Cultural studies
provide inform
ction in the Willamette Valley of
nemis studies conducted cooperatively by the U.S.D.A.
College during the past several years have indicated that bop
minced by irrigation, soil fertility, plant spacing and
f vines per plant.
Limited data from Lngland and how Zealand
indicate that trellis height affects yield and chemical composition.
Prelim..
inary experiments at Oregon State College and in Mew zealand indicate that
time of spring pruning will influence yield.
Proseders,
of experiments has been organised from which it 13 hoped
there mill come information leading to improved cultural practices for this
type of hop.
The following list outlines the various cultural trials math
have been established or which will be established as soon as sufficient
A b1481* et
3
trellis OW
eerjumstion with varietal eampavisens of Hailertio arid five Ober
varieties 'Marx Late Clester# Braserss
Osielereladir grew Or e
tti)
OW. 135.1 and 1284# )
2. A date of pruning study eensistingo
pruned mouth of rive different dates, i
and April
April 15,
3.
A number
treatments
Villa will be
Nara 151, Marsh 25 April 5
25.
4# 44 ore vines
of vines and
hill in eembinatien with
*peeing t
per
74 ft. apart is
p
8 ft. rove.
4.
X and
A fertiliser and
possibly
other of rants in combination with
The details of this
study will
medium and high water application.
not be completed until soil tests have
boon
made.
5. Depending upon the a
of
nvolving
establiehed there will be a si
stripping
and
suckering vs. no stripping or suckering.
for
An experimental site of 3.14 acres has been selected and leased
eight year period. This site is moderately
Dolls
esnveniont
to the
is a
East Farm and well protected on three sides by trees. The soil
sandy loam well suited for hop production
It is almost certain that
beoause of the
its location will provide for production of seedless hops
isolation
provided
by distance and wind protection from other hops.
Construction of the trellis in still in progress. Due to the
amount of land needed for roadways,
irrigation
facilities, anchor rows and
to somewhat
irregularity of the sits, the experimental area will be confined
aver two acres.
(depletion of the trellis and installation of irrigation
afring of 1994
3
eatio go nal lariat settings
nocalvid ill V* Willi
1ST it was ispeaelble to eetabl
s planting ill th* entire ere* Tie
Igitt of trellis study end the date of priming stair were planted in 1957.
itpmatiwAsky 60 cuttings vere planted. In aa Imam rev and pbonting
be taken free it is 1953,
studios established in 1957.
as
d
in a forced draft
trills.
"k
All other
colerimetris method (1952 Amonal RoPort. P. 109
solider nose determined.
EseZesee.w..Aigesel
N' 'mesh detentinstions sere made on 7 experiments invel
lino
ts. Detailed data will be blend with those line project results.
1. Classiest Defoliant Trial. 9 entries. 4 replications. Analysis of
Variegate showed neither treatment nor replication differences when tested
(
(See Caber
Irstarastiony
d
Thaws data Imre not
6.
arm below. (Um CRa54.)
Yield Trial (Prom" samplan). 1$ entries§
)
647
5.92
2447
5.61
107.1
109 4
123.1
4.28
846
5.52
6.30
6.93
1,.31
745
5.95
6.33
8.92
6.70
3.98
6.82
2.90
72
6.23
3.54
10.30
6.25
135-1
3.2.0
3.00
2.35
2.
"1
3.78
(1)
3.54
3.63
5.914
2.35
f 14 replioations
fromatiewhill Plost. laiPU44. (at.d
bill
9
and 9411-
et
ion nisi
related to fstlli lsssls
not a
previous
16
tionsi
!41.1th.). MN regatta
indieate t at
another.
is gaits variable frost on* location to
1.
var., 1 zips.
2.
3. rep., 5 hill plates Oil yields from dried hope only.
3. Gerrallia.Preeerc TWA Trial, Presser, Wash. 11; up. var., 1 mom. var.,
3 Sipe., S bill plots. 01l yields from di iad hips only.
Reed.te in tabulated sumary tom are promoted to the halftime
tents
been
0
C
atr estistasiatri soparailet at Asp 41
bi bud la Ufa
0.85
1.56
0
45
0.75
41110
411001
0.92
1.03
1.77
04,
0.72
1.03
0.72
1.1,6
143
0.81*
1.25
0:as
1.59
147
1.32
0.55
0.49
0.76
1.22
1.311
146
0.92
0.53
0.179
1.hig
0.91
1.69
0.63
043
2.10
mit
0.148
1.20
0.69
0.60
1.66
0.31
1.43
0.31
040
.60
1.28
h zio in
Samples of some of thee* have
graPhY 0
done in cooperation with the Department of
State Con/.
Y
information en these
1957 Crop.
Sys
is to
These have been stored at OF. The first series were
and oil yield immediately to provide the initial data for the
(For these data see 0.0544 A amend aeries wee analysed
third and fourth series viii be analysed in March and July respectively. The
data for the tour storage dates mill appear in the 1958 Annual Baloart.
1956 Urcp.
The following table summarises the data Obtained dosing 195647.
Detailed data by replication will be found in the appendix..
Due to missing
samples these data cannot be subjected to statistical treatment.
However,
in order to divide the varieties into "stability classes", the percentage loss
A
12
17
A
15
39
15
2.7
(1)
0.40(2)
0.59(3)
0.49(3/
(3)
A
0.57(3)
141M
2.3
(3)
(3)
0..23844)
3.9
2.6
0.83(3)
(3)
(3)
0450040(3)
144
3.1
1.36(2)
.
(2)
5.6
..
(1
(3)
0(4)
1442
5.6
4.4
2.7
0.52(3)
&eel&
tzti5g3
f).76Re3
Oil
s-acid
oil
*amid
oil
127.1
132.1
135.1
1384
0Imme
13
14
15
16
25
18
A
ts2r9g))
0.99t)
0:92i8
843
:k9,2
1.13(e)
dial
toliti
:1413
4
=id
67
6.4
10
21
(2)
(4)
A
26
3.9
4.9
1.03(4)
2
(2)
5
f
(4)
148(14)
144
5.6
1.5$
(2)
i
1.75(2)
(3)
(4)
1.50(2)
5.3
.1
09
(4)
1.3.3(14)
3.45(4)
6.4
112.1
1234
126a
ik:zu
10
11
12
A
27
k665((1143
14.57)083
14.198:i
1,084
A
16
4.141143
14:145g;
101.1
7
A
29
19.41a
1.11)M
11183
3.1
5$
0453i8
t
2.18
Capitol
Farms
Coleman
Farm*
Bullion.
pure
not
is
variety
this
that
suspected
is
It
3. 2. 1.
average
so
stable
-cr)
1:mit*F
4e(Jt0),
e e
unstable
UA
the
of
basis
the
on
calculated
is
content
oil
or
aacid
original.
fellows,
as
indicated
is
Stability
in
Loss
met.
associated
per
milliliters
as
the
in
involved
replications
of
number
hops.
dry
of
graft
basis.
dry-weight
Qua
as
$
es
Tab
is of
Airfield Ksplanation
presented
given
is
the 100
indicate
parentheses
in
Numbers
011
2,5
27
11b-
= cr=
Seed1ess3amecid
26
(1)
A
0.86(1)
3.7
(1)
1.14(1)
4.9
63.
(1)
U
30
0.95(1)
2.7
(1
1.15(1)
4.
(1)
(1)
1.29(1)
5.3
(1)
146(1)
6.9
5.0
144(1)
04164(1)4.941)
ell
hulas
35
A
31
3.14
1
(1)
0.149(1)
3.
0k
0.69(1)
(1)
4.5
(1)
0.71(1)
52
. .
. .
1.76(1)
pi
7.7
(1)
146(1)
7.4
OP
(1
1.1h(1
5.5
(1)
.66(1)
.2
at 0( **A Mt et
stesdoiri diviatiss
as esie
akin gm. wen ealeelated
oc"
lase *en van very *Sailer for be*
,X *kW* art tar e * ward NM sad saariard thrliAtilla ter be* quality
fasten MS used to preside as ebjeettore stability evalmaties Those varieties
WA lea an Memo loss at lass
o g Q me classed as stable (S)
Thais losing are that ST/0 uare slammed as unstable (V) T rossinder
mere slammed as average (A).
Brewer's Gold mere least stable. The average
eleven menthe storage at 384? vas 26%.
variety
125.1, a strong hop similar
Browses 0014 or Bullion was found to be
superior to either of these.
ne oil loss and
as average
D. Svaluaties
o flown
ObJeet;vess gee 1956
Deratirts
very
144ais a very fragrant variety *well& essentially
()Capecid loss.
P 118
Annul Repo*'
erne 1956 Annul Report, P.
s
emmAumagemndt
ohieh vas classed unstable.
US,
500 1956
sae 1956 Annual Report, p. lie.
a
xperiesntal Results#
Plovers from 5 replications of 20 varieties of isle
hop plants
have been collected.
analyses
Amu
fbr
use
samplos are being stored at 32° F until chemical
..sold and possibly cohumalone can be node.
of
t
(used as
difference is f
appropriate fertilisers.
If so differece in quality (or other factors) is
founds growers will be able to safely make their selection of fertilisers on
the basis of other characteristics without concern about a resulting quality
loss.
Ceoperatores
1.
P. Ballantine
2,
Capitol Perms.
Provide an experimental yard and to be responeible four
management and sampling.
3.
U.S.D.A., A.R.S.
Aid in emporia*
design, aid in general supervision
and sampling, provide laboratory space' for hop oil separation, etc., collect
leaf samples at flowering time and at harvest time for N, NO -No P, POr?,
Ca and Mg determinations.
Pr° 11062E1
Two simultaneous approaches are to be taken.
One, a production
scale experiment with 4 levels of fertility and 3 replications.
The second
an experimental group with 5 levels of fertility and 5 replications of 5 hill
plots. These are called *the College Plots.
The production plots are to cover approximately 27 acres while the
)
law (55#
as
rr 117S1
Cheek
1111414Ii
Ter z $
1.41i
Per
w 104,
AV per hill;
Ii
sv
62 IR
1.670
Per hill
sHper
1:00# trebts
superphos.
1150
oollootod at intervals throaghout
burring
to hari
and ell yield nos
eXlorid
IV Us wrightCreely so
Floss 1 shows graphical/7 the results of the oil
green and dried samples tile figure 2 'hems graphically the results
of
the
-61leeld analyses.
The oil content of fresh hops vas
food to bid
letil about September 1, after Allah the rats dropped off until it
a
sundae' at about September 6, or ha days after flowering.
The oil content of the dried hope was found to follow this quite
throughout the season. This indicates that highly volatile oompenents
appear at About the same rate as high boiling components.
$ubstantiatien of
this depends on future experiments of similar nature, or direct analysis of
the oils.
The alpha acid concentration built up rapidly after big, to a
axiom between August
Both
15 and 20, where it remained until harvest
non
the season, indicating the need for better a
on
September
9
Is'
14.;
ki
SO
52
511
27.7
*94 *7.3
25.9 11.3
28.3 29.0
29.5 29.7
7037
2.10
7.52
7.52
1102
rlossring dates July 20, 1957
} rovassion Um, S D.M. atctate)
?
Using alscu.lated dry natter
3.St
3s
3.
3.5 5
3.73
3.57
0,336 k
3.64
443
3.85
3.19
3*
11.514
04
6/1
9/6
lislatiss of Alpha AIM to Illiturity
yori*Vs. Dallies
o
o0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
1
Aug. 11
10
20
30
3Pt 9
% DA.
22
2/21
em
32
112
j* fires
a
?
'mow muff
ePTINS`)(
uorwatradft
a
E
wilartri
30
era
Cr/
sr/
=Mart, i0 110710..)e
SIVFM-"*"7-10.
vteigsaia
9SCo90
ttt
60
lutrouo jo uaatli Wag
*MIMS
WM
(t)
t
itarowndsv
At
Mt=
)
lavew
t
Tlyo
9
Tr
9C
ONO
oti
09C
to Woucto .;* nesa *deg At PM** I)
gag
guserivesz
1454
if
atC
orliatikull
rrt
L
afr/
ilialirTrier; ITC
soL9oo
ISCLIo
mellowrtifirff
tin
WL
tiLL
WI
;o
1:0600
TOM
9LWO
85290
lanerr"i
7
C00000
Tt60
'wow
Scgdro
961109
1111.111111
v.
04040
3
0.2
6
023072
0.61737
tea
Lea 2 sad 3 de
*eaten% of either
he 5,» level. a
nil oontent of peen
T.
)
but thil diff
is not evident in
the oil content of dry ha
Results of ramipling method (2).
samples collected by this
Table is lists taw data obtained
ss apl,
T
method
:ht basis)
-asid, oil free green and
Sap Ling method (2)
Sian old/
oil oaa4rnt (Nis.,,
3.02
7.88
7.30
7.68
3.71
3.61
3.82
3.71
7.7T
3.71
3.53.
bod(2)
107
Abbe
aspialamat asi sonseqmontly tits
treatments
almentod (10 ).
this reason oil determinations
is of analyses for A" aesid and
oil content are given ba/w
Table 5. %
-a z da Production Plots dry weight basis. Lempling method
Drying temporature
Treatment (riots)
Samples 14
5.8
'4.2
741
8.19
7.77
7.99
3.74
8.68
8.
8.47
8.80
Analysis of Varian**
Sum of Spas 1st
TSUI
14672
14043
3
6S7:_
11
4.9659
1
Mean 0
0.148907
0.78409
1.001$1.61013
3
0.623714
IWO
).
249
atnalsvais of V
IslEa;421mi
04973
040407
0.03107
0.2.5413
0.2069
0.391?
S Ur*
045977
0.02k07
040107
0.15413
4402586
8.32129
0.
0.
5.96017
the ease of sampling method (1) treatment differences are not
danonetrated for Y'EseciAl, either when United collectively or when tested
relative to their dryiagtemperataree The oil oontent of the acesserelally
dried hops de not show troatment differences when tested col ective rs but
when bream into an orthogonal set of individual degrees of freedom, and tested
at the 5$ level of signlficanee a difference is indiested for treatment, I
sad 2 vs. 3 and 4. This coincides with the two drying temperatures, and is
consistent with tha belief that flop oil is conserved at lower drying tem?erstures.
Lxperiment 2 was sampled by three methods to determine treatment
West on ocutacitt
and oil yield.
None of these methods was this to demon..
*trate a treatment effect on either constituent.
109
fug
afest
Oil Yield at Cells
The WU*, flats sirs sispled
Ths malts of assloss far °Conti. grew ells sad, dm oils far
of t
5 treatments awe prossutsit Was.
r)C omit (1) sealants (% D W 3)
ftrattia
3
3
74.1.7.26
?JP
7.31
7.30
36.29
vas
7 45
7 .0It
7.51
7.65
7.56
115
6.2%
740
7.14
36.64
35.56
7.291
7 .57
7.20
TA'
37.96
7.30
36.65
36.96
6
36.03
9.5%
70
T
36.42
Asli
3740
182.67
Iris nathad 1949 formula. This is recognised as
t tar &Mien bops latish is approthiatalY
malts.
Analysis of Variance
Total sq..
PI' dm?
6,,6 9.
1,337.65743
3..333.36906
1,337.41610
1,340.37730
Ask
Scarce of
Total
s
Corrootian
Traatment
Replication
Steer
Total
Table
8,219.2
3214
329411110
1.645.05/As
1, 650.190e
*
330.03616
3314406
33144060
Two way table of oil yielda Srcaa dry bops (141s/ 00 S. p W 9)
RANATreatment
1
2
3
5
3
2
1
3.58
2.51
2.82
3.06
2.23
3.01
3.18
3.26
3.16
3.39
3.32
3.20
2.96
2.91
3.48
3.15
3.39
3.06
3.05
281,
14440
1640
15449
25116
Average, dry
Analysis of Variance
Totals age.
Roues of Total
Variation
par *bail
214.2
Cerroction 6,0064
Treatment
S
1,203.6502
Replication 1,202.U68
Error
Total
*2.3318
latu
2403
.075000
214442338
0.48004
4.173
24243180
2.
DA& itst Reamirk,
4.
044334
048927
11.s.
14 fertilisers tested in the
cation of cC acids green and dry
ailed to yield
blank dent
inference to be drawn from this
nitrogen 0111 and *5) ara
n of the above constituents.
6
t in prwrrfined that such ]ant tseperat ive
practical dne to the longer time required, these data clearly indicate that
a grower mho is interested in preservation of oil should dry at the lowest
possible temperature.
dried. Tables of results and results of analysis
are present,* Welsh
Major elements
to date. Total nitro
vas flung to be significantly higher in leases
from ammonium sulfate plots theatres* nitrate plots. Fertilisation raise*
the total nitrogen oontente over the shock in all treatments.
Nitrate vas
a less sensitive indicator and neither of the above offsets were demonstrated.
A treatment difference was indicated for total phosphorous but was found to
be due to bider values in the check plot rather than being due to the form
of nitrogen, applied as fertilisers
No differences could be demonstrated
for the inorganic fraction of the total phosphorous.
treatment
Potash showed both
The treatment differentia included a
and replication differences.
highly significant difference between the amputee fertilised plots and the
nitrate plots.
Calcine concontsations showed a significant treatment
difference but this was not due to the check plots nor was a difference
between treatments I and II demonstrated.
low magnesium values in the check
plots were apparently responsible for a significant treatment mean square.
Minor elements'
The iron mutant of Bullion leaves on both
July 10 and ,optenber 10 was highly variable, ranging fron 1140 to 300 ppm
on the first date and between 55 and 385 ppm en the second date. Neither
treatment nor replication differences were indicated by analysis of variance.
While manganese did not show a aignificent treatment difference on July 10,
Isistona% as Sato lireatessdi
va Teuton* U
1010,11$11 the $111WASP dirt
Aiwa
than the ethers end that the manganese ammleata ellembees% II
than Treatewat 14 the data suggest that nen/amen accuseslates
extant in plaits
differs
lised with ammonia sulfate. k eiftedileset
mere indicated for boron at flowering tine but a treatment
difference appeared at harvest, and was found to be a *hest:plot differense.
The *ism contents sf loaves from the ammonia! sulfate plots mere math
lover than those in the nitrate plots on July 10. On Septeiber 10 many
samples were bolos the detection level (IP pPa) of the analytical, method
and consequently could not be atatistisally evaluated. At flowering
only 3 samples had melybdenna oonosntrations greater than 1 ppm.
At
harvest all molybdenna coneentrations mere less than 0.9 ppm, the &teatime
limit of the analytical method.
g-tr,P-"C-
:40aktt uksis
rwrna
k
00000
Wak
4611111444
W MOOPOM
X
X.3
X.X.
XS
LA.
104
30
10.5
21
112
IA
0
1114.
$.3.
N.S.
M.S.
K.S.
11114
Ns
1140
N.S.
I
4,
2.3.
<.9
11
7
..<4
13.5
<9 <9
<.9
74 <.9 9
94 < 4 < 4
9
1.11
<
.9
ssopstation iitk r. lallesites 4 OM a lariat vas eaellestod 'to
the
the feel of eitropoi met as fertiliser ma *SU*
It was alas desirable to follow Um seasonal
This Lemmatise wad allow growers to
koraledge of its effest ma quality.,
this trial wire peeped Leto fire sostiees
(1)
QT
season.
The oil
of August' and held fairly steady until harvest olt
to
mutest increased until the first meek is September,
gently until harvest.
(2,3)
supplied as fertiliser. This experiment
?afoot of the form of nitro,
ssd plots replicated 3 time and on 5.1411
was oondueted on both produotion
plots replicated 5 times,
differences this to the forme nitrogen could
be demonstrated for OCwaeld green oils or dry' oils.
(4)
Effect of drying temperature on the preservation of hop oil.
Laboratory
drying at lle? yielded oil lessee of 347% 'drone commercial drying at
135.1 and 145!? produced losses of 33% and 39% respectively.
(5)
Leaf seeplee mere analysed for 12 elements or *impounds; total N,
NOt, total 14, Parrs Ks Ca, Ng
Psis rA, 1, Zn and Me. Calculation of
individual degrees of freedom for treatments I vs.
liKTS4 9), indicated
that the eonsentrations of total s, i, Mu and Zn were influenced by the form
of nitrogen applied as fertiliser.
Ir
aan be
(This
*merriment
a" listed
d
h5
emeplete), nutrient ee lution
wo weeks.
At the end of this period the three treys were drained and
were washed and sorted so that all treys appeared to have equally
vigorous plants.
The trays were supplied with (1) ne nitrogen, (2) sodium
nitrate and (3) ammonium sulfate.
The solution* were changed weekly.
experiment continued from May 13 to June 27.
Lindigatallata
Planks which received no nitrogen grww ohloretie and b
the experiment were dead.
Those receiving a
Those receiving sodium nitrate grow abundantly.
nium nitrate ceased
growing but
maintained a dark green
color.
pH mu.rementa disclosed that this type of experiment requires a
(i)
nithite
(3) anotatia nitrate
(2)
64
6.2
vaibuttend artrient selnt im after 6 day* myths
iat
5.11
TA
(3)
3.8
aeid buffer.
gremth Ronever it
5.2
ooditn: nitratsr
sulfa**
5.2
5.2
trient solution after growths
1-tax,
(1) no nitrogen
5.3
(2) sodium nand*
6.6
(3) ammonium sulfate
5.8
Lim
64.10
5.8
N. eilnolusiona can be drawn regarding the
utilise ammonium sulfate as a nitrogen sourer because of t
k of pi(
It is an interesting observation that while no g
sulfate solutions, sufficient activity vas present to
proximately 3 liters of nutrient solution to values near
.0.
c.
04,44, provides a method of a
in
1.
.
f
applicable to two analyses
hop research laboratory:
parati©n of aobutyrio and. i
*Uric acid
is tho dotermination of
wohumulon and humulon plus adhumulons* Such separaUons and quantitative
analyses have boon roported
2
by
Howard and Tatchstio
Separation and characterisation of hop oils. Meyer work in t
boon dons by Aleby tm4 by
tatcholl.
It is planned 4:4 con,ltruet several different types of volumes for
use with the tuatara's's% available (Ram DistillogrAPh t)4000) and to evaluate
these from the
point of the separations 11.3ted above.
A
Samples of Myroans,
phyllens have b
s
obtal
thyloneseiAmtens -)(searyophallans
used as narkers in both types
Hymens, methylemonylkotoas and both saryophyllanes have been
identified in the elution diagrams of
p oils but
ersnial has not yet been
located.
Of *ppm
O.L.C. , none has been found which contains all the peaks &hewn
accompanying charts,'
U&
or the
igid chromatographic separe
oils have been prepared and evaluated.
found to give, 22 peaks.
produces
One, Apiesea Man Wl t. has been
The other, 2.ethyl.hexy1.phthalate on Oelite
peaks. The Aptoen 11 column separate* 3 oomponents the
hexylwrhthalats leaves unresolved and 2
othylmbintylsphttialate
ethylm
separates 2
that Apiesen X leaves unresolved. TherefOre the total nunbor cf components
detectable is 26 Of these is peaks have been identified as Xyroene
Nethyl.nonyl-ketonearyephillene and
earyephyllene.
nirg
11uT2aTakg
VIST4 elArMart YMCA
V11.4.0;01.1 *Oa
VIS
4° 55
I
COT /
ro9
C
10t I
5'1,1
Lot x
6C9
9.55
940$61
r59
9421
9° 19
tit
r55
via
9° ,1L
q6
5° Clz
'mg
0912
00x
5
901 1
roS
t'65
zz9
641/1
/5
0161
9
601 1
4.99
1'09
59C
9° 59/
919
00Ta
L
alt I
656
9
11.
595
9'9Ca
egL
099a
9
EaT
ro9
0.15
0° 69
aooa
1.99
o/aa
6
la
1C1
r91
.55'1
a° 511
8'1 1('
091
01
LaT I
eo£
9° Sa
CI
Mot
tc
T1
aft
I/
S'a5
0° 91
S69T
1'95
oa6T
at
SET I
9./.1
6ES
1.z5
16151
EIT5
wax
CI
9E1
VL?
6EII
6LE
oda
lit
16£t
1'09
rz9
TIL1
1° 95
001
51
11T /
EIL
009
91
904q1
1° 15
L9E
(r5t1
MET
E'n
0151
9'156
66969
*MN
9'5cia
cri.5
01161
xv40I
axs
99
6£'01615
aS Z'
Eo6T
baeli5
350108t0
09t?
514.6
334 59.6
39.9 554
Ma 1134
It.5 915.0122.5
593 i06.1
624 322.9
316.3
60.14 Me
38.5 70.0
284440
21.6 58.5 804
317.0
WO.*
6
1094 143.3 56.9
7
1124 3107 950 133.6
82.11 1133
8
11234
568 80.2 135.0
66.1 51.0 1174
78.9 69.0
9
121.4 3540 43.11 79.3
59.6 146.14 10660
36.3 55.14
877.0
524
36.1 25.8 62.0
29.9 104 73.6
187.7
11 1324 39
71.0 110.6
35.1 52.5 65.6
26.1 146.0 723
268.3
1354 27
47.8 74.9
26.1 53.9 804
23.7 52.14
233.3
13 1384 314.14 27.2 61.6
48.9 143.0 91.9
35.3 43.7 79.0
232.5
11
1394 31.4 604 91.5
28.6 623 90.7
25.2 5242 77.15
259.6
15
1144 35.2 714
3.06.5
233 60.0 834
MA 59.0 107.8
297.4
16
B.0.
29.0 51.14 80.14
29.6 3167 664
28.4 145.0 73.4
2204
30 3274 1.18 30.7
12
SI
21.6
L5663
612.7
951.6
606.4
1505.3
8960
572.1
110.111
11457.2
8854
14526.8
23938.39 140144546
214973.63 162717.35
54840.39
62214.68
25566.36 1!58639.31
510429
u27989.96
Ma MI MI IS
4.8 354 21.k 3%6 274
511.6 36.2 334 264
36.3 2%4 264 23.7
3
.8
1957
554 60.2 144 714.7 50.6
10 73.8 334 74.8 594
.7 95.
131.8
87.5
98.8
77.0
.213.k Al 71.0 47.8 274 604 71.3 AA
.4 82.1. 51.8 h6.11 25.8 52.5 53.91 b3.0 623 0.0 36.7
55.8 14.6 554 414.0 0.1 384 58.5 6%0 55.1. 113.7 46.0 52.11 43.7 524 53.0 4,
1 95.6
in.,
132.7
168.6
1143.5
2374
VOA
360.2
1364
"Lisa
I61.5
1134
190.3
185.6
2004
1004
1544
174.4
327.0
277.0
$2.0
1.00.0
187.7
.5
297.4
251P.6
2201
it5i6J
63
53
31
67
62
253
236
49
81
62
56
757
9
104
265
302
80
93
79
63
39
112-I 41 39_
55 45
47
84
65
42
62
32
36
32
111
60
49
22
22
54
28
58
223.
49
61
315
60 22
30 35
17 25
262
31 20
42
62
12
207
244
3
51
72
34
a74
18 17
35
75
43
23
40
38
25
18
n
el
48
58
36
257
232
223
2,08:4
65
37
39
78
68
67
55
61
275
220
40
358
853
17
23
28
51
41 38
27
79
IA 15
40 35
39 la*
38
45
16
20
58
26
29
35
50
142
114
109
76
71
149
214
33
23
28
22
30
314
38
140
40
47
72
72
18
70
44
37
20
25
17
14
3
2
27
62
.37
37
19
60
47
28
35
26
33
30
50
31
21
52.
22
15
140
20 17
72
20
31
12
25
32
g2
20 15
35
169
29 35
614
17
27
414
140
68
74
80
33
714
38
140
314
T3
140
36
140
76
141
35
296
6914
314
221
35
780
42
73
37
211
12
118
140
35 24 0
72
33
39
300
27
33
61
40
30
71
314
63
63
68
58
655
63
57
232
30
19
26
38
37
39
142
40 32
22
195
114
36
20
12
252
45
61
38
210
2143
28
37
n
59
74
231
13
38
1$2
50
29
305
18
17
32
33
33
251
1914
11
71
57
54
65
30 19
149
78
235
831
11212
SX
JAI
3162
Ink
1
3577
of Tadao*
2114
323
2
15
Its129.227
1.632.422
5.821.602
4.0$16
336
..072
27,529125
317.11
76.20
e1.35
72.36
87.20
4
4.90
19.59
5.77
5.145
14.63
3.714
1144
18
4
3.11
15.10
3.91
3.99
3.44
346
1394
17
14
5.47
2147
5.35
6.23
5.51
4.78
/384
16
4
2.38
9.50
2.35
2.53
2.31
1354
1.5
4
3.51
14.04
5.33
2.27
3.72
132.1
11s
5.72
1745
5.01
88
1274
13
3.98
15.90
3.13
5.12E
.65
1244
12
is
6.33
2542
6.22
6.25
6.17
1234
11
3
5.36
08 16
650
it
6.30
25.18
640
6.17
is
4.28
3.7.10
44"
4
3.97
3647
3.34
3
NO.
134.
5.80
0
78
3.67
6.68
Unbolts 10
0
0
114
16.55
Sos
1746
6.2k
2041
6.70
670
2.94
10.63
344
9.01
340
2.36
7.36
2.15
545
1673
691
3.58
10.69
),63
231
744
2.35
3.26
2.46
2.47
202
sx
87
.n
SI2
7751
.3785
Analysis of Varianos
fr
igt
114
7
7
7
*-
afpo
47
44.
4
.ft
1 Tug lei
1, 0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
101 I
102 I
103 I
104 I
106 1
1414
67.6
34.5
63.1
58.7
66.3
1414.3
107 I
108 r
88.3.
11 112 I
1.2 U7 I
88.14
9
10 1.09 I
69.3
63.5
118 I
14 121 I
50.8
81.9
62.7
1.3
15
122 1
16 123 I
17 I& I
18 125 I
19 3.26 I
20 1.27 I
21 128 I
22
23
214
130 I
131. 1
132 I
25 135I
26 138I
27
28
139 I
141. 1
29 141 I
S1
S12
66.14
57.0
55,9
43.6
33.1
510
86.8
64.1
147.1
53.2
53.3
148.8
73.0
92.3
46.9
464
39.3
40.3
82.7
33.6
59.6
99.2.
5c .5
44.8
0.5
60.7
57.1
59.14
52.3
86.3
71.7
614.8
82.2
0.7
143.1
1404
87.0
45.6
66.8
79.1
57.2
106.1
40.6
614.1
56.5
81.2
60.7
63.7
53.6
37.8
62.2
1414.8
141.0
41.5
17.7
66.4
81.0
148.9
51
78.3
37.9
58.8
73.9
66.7
30.2
142.3
65.7
314.0
83.0
72.6
56.3
514.1
82.8
55.7
1,756.7 1,809.6 1,619.9
1130620.143
98,883.17
1220143446
53.8
66.4
62.3
92.5
61.8
66.9
73.3
71.0
26.4
79.0
52.5
83.4
57.5
58.3
68.9
30.9
51.3
31.3
70,8
914.5
91.0
58.14
43.8
68.4
52.1
75.6
86.3
35.2
82.$
43.5
54.2
100.5
60.8
66.0
49.9
3.01.6
58.3
55.0
99.9
50.1
69.14
63.7
78.3.
96.5
39:5"
69.1
56.9
(69.2)
78.7
77.6
46.2
31.5
72.7
63.0
83.9
73.5
20.1
808.0 4912.2
233.5
.6
310.6
278.2
431.5
326.0
228.9
460.4
239.6
365.6
319.5
3141.2
327.9
231i0
259.1
176.8
323.5
389.9
3640
219.8
229.6
337.0
264.6
369.6
407.5
214.2
829064
137,6514.22
2,885,1446.08
1229437.30
49.6
59.6
46.7
60.3
82.3
62.1
55.6
86.3
65.2
1458
92.1
47.9
73.1
63.9
68.2
65.6
Ma
51.8
35.4
614.7
78.0
72.4
1444
.1*.
1690
2030
1590
2050
2800
2110
1890
2930
2220
1560
3130
1630
2490
2170
2320
2230
1570
1760
1200
2200
2650
2460
11490
142.8
1560
2290
1800
2510
2770
1140
61.4
2090
45.9
67.14
52.9
73.9
81.5
Harvest ;eights (lbs./Plot) in the Experimen
Yield Trial, 1954.4957 inclusive
Entry
Rep .1.
19
I7--fuggles
2
L C
3
4
5
6
101 I
102I
103 1
104 I
91.7
36.5
49,2
1052
1231
48.4
54.4
95,2
109.8
91.4
116.6
46,2
99.0
78,4
88.4
83.5
124
125
126
127
128
130
131
132
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
25
135 I
76.2
74.0
83,2
101.2
83,5
89.2
46.7
81.3
26
27
28
29
138
139
141
144
I
I
I
I
1061
7
8
107
108
109
112
117
118
121
122
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
SX
SX
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1955
17.
14.8
42.8
50.4
44.0
24.4
34.8
34.4
8.8
16.0
37.2
31.2
72.0
36.0
43.2
56.8
66.5
37.7
47.9
63.7
42,9
38.8
74.6
45 1
48,7
63.4
56.8
80.5
51.6
41.6
71.5
58.0
32,0
63.8
17.6
32.6
51.1
54.8
34.4
26.8
75.0
89,4
73.2
91.0
2282.2
982.8
191,88704
48.6
29.2
24.0
36.8
12,4
50.8
59.6
4.0
73.6
1956
3
53.0
62,9
43.1
40.9
53.3
43.8
1957
1.1
67.6
34.5
63.1
58.7
66.3
44.3
88.1
69,3
63.5
88,4
50.8
81.9
62.7
66.4
57.0
55.9
43.6
33.1
54.9
86.8
64.1
47.1
53.2
53,3
480
Total
---1JE33
227.1
162.4
219.5
274.4
176.8
181.4
2811,14
230.3
209,7
316,8
173.3
301,6
240.5
254.8
250,2
255,2
217.2
212.1
206.3
276.2
250.6
163.7
199.4
217.0
70.6
41.7
73.0
92.3
46.9
180.0
258.0
295.7
189.6
1543.5
1756.7
6565.2
468
1954
195
Rep.1X
1956
195
To
0
89.8
28,4
35.2
56.4
33.6
38.8
44.0
30.8
44.4
40.0
34.8
43,6
42,0
33.6
24.0
53.2
37.6
4,0
56.4
43.2
28.0
25,6
24.8
86,8
73,0
76.8
66.4
84.0
47.2
39.1
91.8
67,9
62.2
119.8
115.2
129.1
128.2
59.1
103.0
60.2
82.0
83.5
109.0
65.6
92.8
86,2
73,6
67.1
69.0
78.0
40,5
51.3
78.8
44.9
56.8
55.3
70.6
80.9
70.9
45.1
82,7
33,6
59.6
99.2
59.4
52.3
86,3
71.7
40.9
106.1
40.6
(5t
298.1
143.0
185.2
326.2
205.8
210.1
305.4
288,3
295.3
34592
179.6
273.4
230.8
262.5
236,0
65.7
67.8
58.5
39.3
34.6
39.6
68.3
61.9
45,4
62.5
81.2
60.7
63.7
53.6
37.8
62.2
48.9
78.3
37,9
58.8
235,3
177.9
235.9
73.9
266.9
62.0
6161
38,7
66.7
54.1
82.8
55,7
281.9
257.9
267.9
207.0
2427.3 422.8 1667.1
15809.6
7026.8
88.0
10.4
48.0
9,2
57.0
464
2864
196.1
169.2
244.4
2344
122434.26
59524.64
86,552.47
1544263.42
100708.85
218607.23
1771!618.06
113620.43
49566.56
Harvest weights (lbs./plot) in the Experimental
Yield Trial, 1954.1957 inclusive
Rep.=
Entry
54
Fugues
24
25
26
27
28
29
48.6
100.5
LC
72.4
101 I
72.6
102 I
86.6
103 I
104 I
73.8
61,8
106 I
107 I 124.5
92,6
108 I
109 1
97.5
112 / 122.0
117 I
70.1
118 I 121,6
69.2
121 I
52.2
122 I
123 I 103.0
124 I 110.8
51.2
125 I
90.6
126 I
72.5
127 I
60.8
128 1
130 I 100,6
72.0
131 I
132 I
73.9
71.6
135 I
81,8
138 I
98.2
139 I
141 I 100,0
144 I 110.0
sx
2463.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
SX2
1956
1957
Total
1954
1955
25.6
15.6
31.6
30,0
33.6
26.8
27.2
22,0
12.8
10.0
28.8
15.2
4048
26,4
35.2
8.4
19.6
24.8
21,2
12.8
32,4
440
18.4
49.6
90.7
49.5
39.3
50.5
569
55.5
163.1
257.3
197.3
213.0
238.2
224,7
202.6
274,0
54.4
92.6
62.6
80.8
122,9
87.5
55.3
22.0
20.8
40,4
32.8
2267
66.4
81,0
51.0
30,2
42.3
68,7
34.0
83,0
72.6
56.3
202,7
298.5
176.1
301.6
245.3
190.4
237.2
229.6
165.7
19441
199,7
23609
232.1
169.3
158,6
256.5
23502
260.6
277,9
213,8
127,8
131.0
126.2
64.3
90.0
87.6
53.8
74.1
79$4
76.6
108.2
99.6
81.8
105.0
6342
72.2
84.0
95.6
120,6
88,1
12706
700.0 1695.1 1619.9
64784
2647.4
7.2
50.8
41.2
24,8
148,8
4,0
57.3
67.0
48.8
46.1
63.6
52.1
60.7
45.2
72.4
70.6
45.8
81,0
58.2
48.2
64.6
48.0
62.7
76.5
49.2
35,2
65.4
78,2
54.6
56,5
4345
468
604
57.1
64.8
82.2
55.7
43.1
87.0
45.6
66.8
79.1
57.2
468
41.0
111.5
1707
103792.43
21223,04
9888341
222414422
/
1955
1166
9901488257,
Repair
1956
368
55.1
79.5
50.1
50.3
74.8
50,0
49.0
57.5
62.0
23.2
26.4
25.6
10,0
0.8
38.0
22.4
42.8
20.4
29.2
8.0
8,0
8.8
25.2
26.0
6044
28.8
12.4
13,6
29.6
6244
20.4
3992
(56.2)
62.2
47.6
67,3
62,3
37,7
51.0
33.0
48.7
1957
2(44
44.4
53.8
66.4
62.3
92.5
61.8
66.9
73.3
71.0
26.4
79.0
52.5
175.9
246.7
219.5
22642
325.0
222.5
197,6
27100
270.8
834
5745
58.3
68,9
30.9
5143
3143
714
704
59,4
65.9
81.5
52,6
68.4
5444
65,4
67,1
37.6
94.5
91.0
58.4
43.8
6844
52.1
75.6
86.3
3542
7368 1652.7
1808.0
2.4
366
98650.09
WAX
665.6
1029.2
722.2
843.9
2163,8
829.8
79147
113246
10166
2164
9224
30544
186.8
283,5
22748
179.0
202,0
15143
18544
23602
255.8
302.6
306.3
206,6
16442
85044
126549
725.8
2665
11604
9464
8064
925,4
920.5
41.6
614J
145.1
52.7..
72.7
494
VA
6344
57.8
MI
46
184t5
59.0
$544
008
7664
57.5
47.8
811.6
90642
104947
56.6
65,6
500
10263
71840
758.1
116.10W8
282.0
280.7
202,8
961.6
105845
2222,2
813,2
6,1842,9
26712.9
12243700
24734.56
Lime
,
hhof
147A
614,
6061
6648
58.0
369695
*76,965421
0
4142111t
noted
'WI 0
lot I
of 1
am I
VT I
sa
901
I
I
ZTI
i
ran
TIM
re91
la 9
0901
in Z.
ECa
09rt
Z9 ir
rirSti
WI tr
et/
Vet!
frirtit
E6ti oe
I
In I
art I
a C 1I
la
9COI
V661
L6Ca
rat'
.56? 1
iftt I
$2"Tlt
Milt
119/2
'VI%
9119
aCt tr
SLE IT*
5Zt I
9at X
Let I
oat I
oft I
ICI I
aft I
SEI I
tL9Z
art 9*
5'65£
9ZIt
T9E 6*
56 a*
tr
ro6t
VILE
29
L66a
Vote
Z£9
9'69
ciEtz
solit
Vat
LLI tie
9661
oz
S
razz
6Ez I*
09Za
ti.99a
oC9I
rtSz
ti89g
090a
von
zwtaz
eget
5.11Ez
96Lt
9tiz 0*
a9Z 9*
Eso6T
916g
C661a
rill(
9Tra
9ZZ V
6*
6a
Oa L
6ELI
5'161
0.061
6661t
50a6
irtEz
6°6106
`nal` f6
C
60006t1 ?L
15519
35Ot1Ceta5
9415ti
t5z6
nati9L
rri9
a
E6t152
906
rr
toz r
L''6
0.91L
zit=
t19a * 1
9'61
5
cv9
9.63
ti't1ti6
L`989
£9Z
oafti
55a ` C
L9t
6
I'
9.S5Z
LeS9Z
9°161
n
I*0911
9TIZ
gff '
z
r
zEtt r
riga
PIO
z963
546et
WWI
93 I*
aiL
az6 I*
59at 6*
-NE a*
an it*
9.599
a6801
5*09C
a
591
Z6££
E
rscit
ELt
961
ttga c
LTC a
xs
rat
rtoC
zELt
rtfria
LTE as
19£t
6ft I
tirt I
tea I
ZY
ozu
Wee
S"
I601
L'rt
96E4
trSac
/Ma
90t 1
OT
rag
t951.
3'O66
9196
950T 5*
vitiet
art Z'
fig z
e9 a*166
at6e9a 6*
0"1££
eT 0VIZ9`E9L
56/69499.5a
eta
s
t intssni
z
7 o
I
C
119I
n
ZoT I
tot I
5
9
L
9
6
oT
TT
Et
CT
la
51
91
/0I
901
Lot
gat
601
zTT
at
UT
UT
9'9E
WeSZ
9*ez
(65Z
5*(a
ToSz
zz 5
1*9Z
frez
irgz
9*(z
I
1
T
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
oCT
ICI
viz
zET
53
9z
Lz
ez
6z
15£1
19E1
16E1
axe
LSE
as0
traz
T*5Z
5*Lz
9*Zz
9ZZ
zz
Ez
xs
vim
I
I
I
1
oz
lz
a
XI
I
zet
CzT
IzT
5zT
9z1
LzI
9zT
Lt
9T
,
T/T I
tryt I
III
I
rOZ
r5Z
ezz
CreZ
9*Lz
o*Zz
9*Cz
9*Cz
T*Iz
C5z
9*112
Eset
5° 5z
I*9z
roz
Z*Cz
ezz
6*Cz
C*9z
l*Cz
zz
en69
r5a
Wiz
u
'MA%
ORIT
r6a
eon
ea
565z
z*Z6
e*La
9'9Z
rtiz
9'90t
T*9z
Vita
I*Cz
WIZ
19Z
r/Z
C° 61
56zZ
I*Ez
5'£Z
£z 9'
o*Cz
5"ta
1*61
9*5z
L*9z
ti*Ez
5*zz
5*Tz
9*CZ
961
C!Tz
rzz
6*5z
6*zz
trzZ
T*1z
9Ta
1Ez
egT
Z*SZ
6*oz
6*5a
£z o'
9*Cz
ezz
9e61
9'5z
ezz
rim
elz
croz
ezz
T*5z
Citiz
roz
5*Iz
0° 9z
/'Ca
9*Cz
5*oz
9*5z
e5z
5Cz
T5z
5z
Eizz
L*Tz
z*Ez
6'5z
VITT
L'66
1416
(*lot
('(6
1*(9
E69
11/6
e*90
S*Tot
9*16
Tins
els
9609
C*zoT
root
6*E9
eooT
9'66
r59
z*T6
9*z6
z*L6
9'901
0*Ca
V9a
Z*9Z
6*1Z
9° Ca
r9Z
Ma
roz
Czz
911Z
eTz
tr5z
L*Ez
5*Cz
L*Ez
roz
9*5Z
o*5z
o*Tz
Z*5Z
ena
C*Tz
rzz
z*Ez
1z C*
o° 6z
E*Ez
l'Sz
1tiz
0*9Z
C*Ez
15a
5Ez
0656
C*5z
9*Ez
Es999
E*669
*MIL
6° 69Lez
xna
girsieg ce5Ing91 (0/m0IL1
5° 9Z
Lo*SZ5eLT
ZTat
ET*9TzloLz
e9z
1957.
noptekt
0.40
474,074500
Is
(112) 111
merest weight (lbs. /p
Tsars
L
x!
RxT
L xRxT
Subtotal
b
Grand total
14502497
30097.426
16,377.967
19544957
28
142,980.53
3
1 650.75
15:.46
115
6° .430805.74
3
170,86636
9
(348) 347
47,631.76
6,201.99
28,182.88
252,880.99
(463) 462
313,317.73
(252) 251
390.50 *
1,092,401
147.549
453
550.250
188.160
**
*
50,954.707
567.045 **
689.110 **
112.282
Dry -down percentages, 1957
Total
Reps,
Linos
Error
115
3
28
814
664.390
100287
4550032
199,071
344290
16.2511 **
2.3699
la
TM
4
La
ti
9
U
t
UP
9TZ SI
eLe DT
9
Cam
6et
60 La
0e
9
1% cil
9
ri
Or OS
ela IS
Tr
IR
OD
0
t9
gt
-
As
90V e9
0 lia Se
96g 99
09
9
an a
909
6st
WI oi.
9
91t Cg
S
OP
a
0
s
a
C
Kt tg
IL:
ng
.
Ob
SC
MP
a
0
de
S
0
-
a
a
a
-
-
0
g
*A 1140e41 UPAgeid."
nIA
rrA
1A
s;
0
g
tit gertde won vat du
A Nag*
g
a
Lit
at
6
0$
g6
0
op
GIP
TZ
6
OD
--
Az
a
II
111.
a
A
At
rim
stroptemysia oprar ors
Nei
V
et lah**** %WI trntlab *Um
Dal
lbw
Id Mil
Di*
lat. Total Mt. Total
Ma aft Mai RIM
Milk left Ma
380
54
27
65
1139
siff
D
16
116
C.
53.
III
7ii
9
D
79
5a
$1
81
3
$
51$
C
72
71
h6
D
3
$
VII
C
21
147
D
if
149
8
III
D
D
C
3.
5
u1
db
t7
19
3
V
7
273
Ill
369
286
120
56
58
25
53
Se
ri
lif
56
287
207
JO
256
Ws
S
286
257
50
5$
313
237
137
r T
4
2,5
62
3.32
ho8
as m
25
60
60
103.
23.
323
72
4$
63
38
30
ae
58
257
u5
81
73
C
125
tot
46
76
3th
265
339
35
316
225
140
ma)
ro.0
0.0
76.6
0.0
so.5
17.0
91.4
20.5
79.2
0.0
91.h
0.0
1W
89.4
D
3
194
93.7
91.0
55.2
67.2
25.3
68 A
166
64.6
3007
184
33.2
61.3
27.7
70.2
124
65.8
7.2
58.8
694
21.8
61.5
164
3.
27.6
82.h
68 .6
29.6
68.4
83.8
8403
0.0
894
19.6
89.0
16 .6
81.2
166 U
112
2
2
P
129 25 19.
166
166
120
161
3
4
4
1.81
2.41
3.33 1
1.24 63
189 25 14.811f8
11
150
2
5
3.33 111
7
4
3
7
6.
80
11 17.82 126 15 11.90 130
117 17 X4.53139 32 23.02 130
103.
6 31 11403
15 1X.63
11
9.82
4.97
28.35
26 29.51 39.26
2
16 13.81 6949
157 a
540 19 7 7.07 1.214
3 118 11 9.32
72
323 It 3625 126 2 149 126
123 4 345 228.09)
50 10 20.0 70 12 17.14 113 19
81 171 57 33.33
97 13 13.4 158 36 22.78 111 9 .11 131 53 40.146 87.25
814.75
1)47 126 85.71 179 136 75.97 1118 123
.11 150 110 7343 31842
145 127 81.58 1.20 103 85.83 121 85 70.25 165 113 68.48 02014
100 76 76.0 132 115 79.55 131 103 78.62 175 91; 53.71 287.88
133 81 71.68 103 59 51.28 116 91 78.45 117 97 82.13. 290.12
.4
11".41A*4
4233111SO;
1141.1
98.8
101.0
1401.8
100.14
163.8
155.2
496.8
1214.2
1114.0
1455.9
132.3
115.14
13,6.0
1065
67.1
86.0
lor
Trras
73.3
Ghat*
C
86.2
31414.7
72.6
106.3
67.6
yap=
14714.8
175.2
Crag
31 29 30 29
Pieta*
Pan
Vs
5.0 5.0 34 3.3 14.6
lar
Term
Ck
Pietas
3.8
lar
Terra%
Crag
.7
Pik
V*Plul
2.6 2.6
05
Tamara,
2.9
Cheek
2.6
3.8
314
)47
5.0
ZS
IIV4B Wart
310
(Pueq)
Z 3I0
(wog)
36C
ti Pug 001/40C
oti
tl?
S Pus ooTAS
9tiC
9 MI oot/#L
95C
odC
aSirr
C9C
oISC
SCti
1991
Snit
ITC 9
a°93
ripet
LIC
z6?
C4C
ccia
9K
90C
Cect
9,1E
54%
oOC
Ira
g 69CT-ams #Z©0T/
tiC
tzti
9.5tit
ti9E
6 tebaS
9*Za
9°01
rac
Tel
9°oCT
4eC
6ZLZ
M? T
0I9?
4LTTT
L
69£T-a-s 001/#1
£ 0M/s
XS
'6
I.
59
6ILE191
ta6a910t Neat Tr
0
SS
91$0TT
ttoCotl
Wi°9?
9CC
1.5T rt°59ze
tiC
)
2 Cheek (w)
46.7
39.0
14 Endo. 30100
28.8
34.6
36.8
29.2
66,0
1451
37 3
81.4
344
37.3
72.2
354
30.8
66.7
5 Inds. 51
32.0
29.0
fi
h3.6
367
6 Endo
It .0
78
1
7 175.6 387.3 183.8
3X
a
180.9 363
69669
30,494.63
6,227.30
27,286
075.18
#130.15
117.5 179.1 366.4 ist6 1714 370-7
206.67
art
27021430
6,483.01
11077,41i
Toar
ss
36
15.5ce
33.381
rror a (T
Tears
I
T
arrow. b
R)
h99.3147
459.825
144.250
59.149
31111.556
amolorilak
114270
124.8368
38.3188
140.2500
1448/2
nor&
*IA
1 MO (rtApP06)
5.7
$..54
5.5f
Gbeek(net stripped) 6.34
6.20
5.12
6.03
2340
4 Ratithal 31/108 gal 6.23
5.98
6.10
1,.12
22.143
5.61
5.19
5.56
6030
5.92
22.77
5.69
6
5,63
6.146
647
6.1,2
2448
642
7
6.75
6.42
6.50
4.42
2445
6.04
" 6.06
648
640
5.81
2545
6.26
5.45
6.77
6.%
6.60
25.41
6.35
le729
10.14
1494,8
44.77
190.66
5.96
5
50
10
IP
9
Analysis at Varian,*
Soares of
Variation
Total of
SCIU117011
Total squaros
per obis.
Correction
36351.2356
313547611
Treatment
165565998
1138.6499
2.6738
Replication
9101. 7058
1137.7132
1.7371
84666
T
R
Total
1148.5536
1148.5536
12.5775
0.3819
to
3
0.5790
143
21
0.3889
I
6t
r5
V9
Mit
trs
01(6
051
6ITE
96
5't6
roa
9t
rc
5C6
aC9
L12
0'6$
6Sri
C51
IT 0°
O
6.99
0T1
5LT
9rfot
5C
CoT
L°99
9Ta
9'901
6L
Ct(5
6OT
ti£9
919
9"1
9
rot
ovic
It
St
61t
Zitt
VI
trot
0
54
9T
a
(IT
15
tit
int
9613
1'09
LT
r
095
r
et
L09
diva
6'ot
tr
t£1
at a°
a
tiL
5tiZ
6°61
TCT
0
£'5
a
5L
2
6IrE
CS
©6t
a8
rat
rot
L5
o5T
tr9C
traL
69
r
rst
r
ra
v
5ST
eat
ettL
905
ogt
o°5
CS
r
aL
615
Ardiva
5a
9£
Vol
9°,11
L'L
96
9'6
t'9t
trot
C
1°59
C9
L'61
61 tit,
L
at a
9'6
511
5'6
o°a6
a
9'L
9'6t
ooa
561
oot
9oa
Lliot
a
8'z
9°9
56
oL
TL
rot
Leg
L6
9°05
za 9°
L'99
LIT C°
T09
a5 cr
riT5
r9ix
Lagt
9Lt I°
9991
9'SLt
/*Mt
v
a
xs
9C9
axs 6f155
Loa
r
Zola
to. 09156 LIt9tra
?rat
all°551a o969La 90'995a
5.011
5.37
11
asp=
140
545
5.h8
5.78
14.72
5.53
5.36
543
78
5.41
5.51
107
4.8%
Total
.60
9.0
Kappa
.36
5.33
1WA
5.1.1
4.63
5.11
9.51 10.69
9.e77
9.71g
5.6]
5.06
1.22
5.17
hair
Total.
Thep .I
lisp.111
679
Total
totals
Xs
10.140 10.23
Total of
149.82
53.1414
.61.61
30.39 123.66
542
5.29
14.72
5.56
Rop.III
548
10.83 1042
544
5
547
10.45 10.66
9494 31.26
5
(54") 64
14.96
541
5.39
4.60
14.50
543
73W0
0
35.37
9.63
5.98
5.22
9.99 11.20
5.37
5.31
10.17 10.68
5.17
540
4.68
5.20
9.
6ft
66,
9.31
70.31
50.22 51.25 51.79 51.65 50.66
358.85
9.99 10.27
256.6926
26 9.0051
253.5390
2674965
263.0299
n6.0698
157
356.15
Rep lisation
F
"
Totals
20
25.32 25.68 2542 25..48
25.93 26.11 26.23 25
51.25 51.79 51.65 50.68
0665
I' Variance
40832
.20304
.14/548
.110462
.20065
.0092
00596
ONO
OM.
158
Rsp,I
Itop.I1
Rua
a,p4v
To
25.2
32.9
43.0
34.1
135.2
33.2
25.3
32.1
404
130.8
3.0
28.0
34.2
48,0
30.9
141.1
14.5
31.3
39.7
32.7
31.4
135.1
6.0
30.7
28.2
36.3
314.8
130.0
11484
160.3
192.1
171.14
672.2
5,263.147
7,570.39
5,930.66
En
51
SI2
4,14143.146
11.1
Sour* of V
Total
19
615.338
Rope.
3
207.162
69404
19.583
4.8958
011.593
32.3828
Troatamont5
Error
1.2
90,14148.90
illaretrir
Ira
S
aro
S
was
arcs
5
aria
6rs
min
TL'
Ars
3a amarizad
Cd
fiR
II
%WC'
tetiPC
norm
ST
160
and
St
Entry
Rep.
Rep.
IV
V
Rep.
VI
VII
Rep.
Rep.
Totals. Avg.
VIII
A No
140.8
32.5
3544
42.4
40.8
36.3
1S.6
38.1
3114 39.0
B Mod 14/11
36.3
33.7
23.14
30.9
34.1
31.7
38.7
37.4
266.2 33.3
0 Bev 101
31
35.5
33.0
33.5
37.1
37.7
41.6
38.4
288.2
D Mod 4/13
38.9
35.9
31.6
140.3
32.5
39.9
43.1
1460
308.2 38.5
E Mod 14/25
36.0
434
31.9
27.14
29.8
1130
145.9
50.0
3
183.14
,SX
2
180.8 155.3 1714.5 17/4.3 189.5 2114.9 209.9
6777+50
6607.214
4905.89
61148.15
9272.03
62149.67
8940.93
7263.09
yras or Varianoe
Source of I
SS
Total
39
1211.931
Reps«
7
532.091
76.0130 **
189.918
47.14871 *
489.892
17.14961
Treatments
Error
28
360
.1 38.5
11482.6
1116.114
WWI
A NoPronin 115.6 4041 86
I Nod
48.9 36.3 85.
C. 6.v.14/11
43.9 31.4 75
WA 30.9 85.
V Mid
2
36.1 36.0 72.1
**AM
38.1 32.5 70.6 434- 35eiv 7,03
44.0 33.7 77.7 32.5 23.4 55.9
53.3 35.5.81.1 4445 33.077.E
54.0 354,194 .404 3146 7041
4641 143.2 1943 4442114 7641
110.8
4040
235.5
183.4
4603
221.5
3604
205.6
1554
26.4.112.11 68.8.-
32.9 30.9 6.1.$
-
39.4 33.5 71.9
47.3 10.3 87.6
47.5 27.11 714.9
1714.5
36$ 0
193.5
9909.99 3$271.31
660724
855740 $6140,47
6249.67.
777 50
11269.71 34963.59
4905.81
7825.27 27402.06
24101.7III
Zo
A N o
B
C
D
I
32.3
51.4
45.4
49.4
NOW44/11
Sev
MOd,
Mod.4/25
40.6 73.1 314 36.3 73,7
34.1 85.5 4400 31.7 75.7
37.1 82.5 45.3 37.7 834
324 61.9 56,9 39.9 96.8
33.4 29.8 63.2
SI
2110
386.2
174.3
115.7 4506 9103
5401 38.7 92.8
40.5 Ma 78.6
53.3 3704 90.7
464 41.6 9000 41.7 38:4 804
60.5 434)0306 41.8 440 87.8
43.0 43.9 8641' 41,9 45.9 87.0
51.4 50.01X1.4
109.5
250.6
465.5
226.6
416.1
214.9
226U7
WOO
438.6
9302.33 30461.96
7263.09
12773.72 19.33
8940.93
6148.15
10,473.46 34973.03
9272.03
10609.23 36611026
Treatment
4111..1.11.0.10111.
A No Pruning
B Mod.4/11
C $e.4/11
D Mod
I mod.4/25
SX
BX
Treatment
total
Average
621.8
627.3
650.1
705.6
38.9
39.2
4006
6547
3256.5
2125354.7,
444
40.7
43254969
Tetaj.
Reps.
867.3339
27)4.7712
Treatmen
T x-11 (ez ror a
888.1468
1060.6961
1
Teary
T
13179658
61642931
35
Error b
Treatment x Tears
1956
1957
309.9
311.9
621.8
sx
SX41932319.62
B
0
361.1
266.2
361.9
288.2
123.9048 4*
68.6928
31.7106
1060,6961 a*
10614.914
23.3227
2"4"ay table
397.14
308.2
705,6
650a
627.3
252,91600
201,255.65 214,00.85
E
Total
343.6
308.1
1,773.9
1,482.6
651.7
,986.57
3,256.5
9
IP4
,
Avg.
A
(iie
I *di. early
6
6
6.11
642
25.34
6.34
6.32
6.18
6.67
6.16
25.33
6.33
C
(severs f early)
6.58
6.26
5.31
6.08
24.23
646
D
(Rod nod.)
4.96
5.61
6.47
4.03
21.C7
5.27
Z
(Mod lat.)
443
6.18
6.11
6.35
22.67
5.67
30.92
30.67
28.74
118.64
503
SI
Analysis of Variance
Total squares
Source of
Variation
Total of
uanr_es
per Os.
Correction
14075.4496
703.7725
Treatment
2828.6912
707.1728
3.4003
4
0.8501
ms
Replicati ©n
3524.1390
704.8278
1.0553
3
0.3518
NS
7.0101
12
0.5842
11.4627
19
T x R
Total
715.2382
715.2382
DF
NS
991
tiernexts
Tionietwa
ittrevb uerouttmi irgraS
*titre *pp, Asa Wpm wring
t
intluoM
laiSI
P3M"
inn Lawn°
0
C
9
TT
tlist rem
SS'S
ses
LrS
WI C5
WI S
LC9
1.55
9
rc
nip
p
c
9
uocttug
0
9
tt
9
9 rottOt
0
C
9
tt
I riot
0
C
9
11
0
c
9
Tr
6
x-601
0
C
9
tt
9SC
ser
orS
Set
S
gra
PS
09C
On
eel
009
(IC9
g Le
L tiL
569
99SZ
L
SL9
L
ame
WC
1.5C
w
w
r6 ti
9CZ
90°5
WS
191
59C
tic
6oC
1156E
E
9LC
spiE
zeC
--
..
..
WC
On
ccn
a
.-
WC
WC
L5"1
..
..
zi
WI
nett
9 Sr
59'5
CC
399
ii 09
SLo
Ceti
9r1.11
96C
eon
tiaC
stric
ti zat
91.°C
CeC
9'C
. .
.
939
St
WI
Str
%az
%St
99C
55E
( 80°
95tt
MIT
ti La
L8'£
%az
gaZ
96°C
fir(
0Cz
wn
ssiTL
CLC
6r
6aC
gt CS'
gt z5.
C91
LT
9C°1
6£L
C
WIT
C -E9
tr
6r6
6aC
9/.4
Teti
951
C51
ri
ol.1
4 Le
erti
$45$1
96
69£
06£
%e
Lee
1,EC°
Sr
9
(ol VC
66C
6q
Set
90(
a90a
al°
0zC
E
crti
teC
00ti
L9'£
zto
an
Sr
C
°T
. .
scti
UM
90
66C
11,tt
Sr
pli
66TT
09.rt
O9
CCL
Ctic
99(
°Cg
ea
tt
0'9
109
CEI
arc
C
L5
9 Sr
WS
Er
st 99
ot
(911
z6C
ties 9ti
a Le 69'4
Er 90°
`tt 9a
ST 69°
5i
0(trt
S£6
9 EL
59L
( 99
6a
99.11
1
zeC
MOnthe
!tent
a
645
3
6.02
6
6
11
6.47
6.77
5.80
5.04
0
28
5..03
3
5
3
24 -1
12744
0'
677
441
5.95
48
6.75
6.44
848
114
15
132-1
135I
18
11414-I
4.68
27.78
26487
25462
20.75
6.9h
6.72
6.41
5.22
3.29
3.63
3.32
2.89
5.15
5.13
4.70
4.46
3.85
3.56
3.46
3.18
17.57
17.35
16.32
14.28
4
4.
5.54
6.07
11.61
5.80
71.27
6.03
30
5.65
6.18
5.78
13.35
12.25
11.81
2.77
4,45
4.08
3.93
2.77
10.83
2.71
9.34
7.75
6.79
11
3.458
3.14.
0
3
6
2.93
3.04
2.77
6.0r,
--
5.1
4408
3.57
3.15
3.22
2.98
2.50
2.31
2.81
2,26
2.02
2.61
13.
2.76
3.31
2.51
2.27
0
5.98
4.94
4.95
5.00
4.58
5.03
5.07
5.25
4.25
20.90
20.95
20.03
12.99
5.22
5.24
4.14
4.08
3.96
3.60
4400
3.46
16.56
16.98
16.38
13.99
4.14
4.24
4.10
3.50
4.86
4.76
-3.71
19.13
14.18
13.76
14.36
4.78
4.72
4.44
3.59
0
3
6
17 1394
648
544
7.61
6,614
7.08
7.04
5440
664458
3
6
6610
6.114
3.75
13
7.62
6.64
5.09
684
6
4498
5.60
4,50
6.17
6.26
6007
3
6
5.86
5.46
4.82
5.02
0
3
6
14.48
4.49
3.94
4.19
4.21
3.61
14.07
0
4.66
4.38
4.61
5.23
4.73
3.65
4. 45
4.58
3.47
3
6
4.74
3.92
3.32
3.43
661
12%
4122
4.11:
2
2.26
5.01
4.32
Werzi
snow
Mir
niff
Irairrahm-Varizavi
tT
tle
41,
0
9
or
01
SallilAte moo
66T
9
LIT
9
OT
LtiT
19
rr
55
AMU
us
tC'
01
6
T
0
41111111
C
CC
10T
C9
1101111
IOW
IOW
IMMO
OT
ASA
IOW
0
C
9
TT
0
C
9
96'
61'
66.
(6'
99'
TO
or
9rt
Wt
tt
6TT
0
SOT
C
9
tt
96
6IT
firST
OCT
96'
'Ti'
'U'
'Tr
'U'
6L
OL
61
tor
CL
or
6r
.-. .
I'
rr
95.
Cs*
Crt
6rt
9
bra
gra
ITO*
95't
ti
er
1199
OT
"Mug
9
9e
Ira
0
C
IT
or
t
t
t
la"'
....
eV
LP
OL
6it
Len
OLT
WI
64
kbt
gekWO
bAl
1+ o:9+W0
."
0
bias
tit
g004110
It
tIt
rrrt rrrr
o=-% 4316 SUOP
it
5.20
2345
24.55
24.60
122.90
Analysis of Varian's
Dr
V
41166
4
"6650
2.2244
4.2786
16
24
.132775
ale. vs. treatments
vs. N9
100
13.3225
5.0625
II
III
IV
V
.1332
.5062
10
1.0032
3.8124
P
.
I
003528)13
n
Indite D.F.
Ireatmen
3.51647 *
.466900
4
1.8676
Treatment
Replication
Error
Total
tATA
Reitz
its
.189
.166
.216
.197
.205
.189
.180
.175
.192
.315
.192
.168
.201
.197
.235
.187
.186
.973
1.051
.993
0
.......Emor
tit
.958
.868
.209
.231
.225
.201
.168
.205
.229
.214
1.006
1.046
1.194
1.038
1.017
5.072
Analysis of Variance
Souris. of V
iow
SS
DV
Treatment
Roplioation
411588
4
.000815
4
Erre:.
.009834
.022237
16
24
Total
F
.0028970
.4002038
.0006146
4.713 *
.0086
.00081
13.1142 **
1.3179 NS
0.332
NS
2
Indirid D
ok$ vs. treatments
NH4 vs. NO3
MS
n .M
.806
.0081
100
10
0
r4 r4 r4 r4
r4 r4
co
MXy
to
et* 2
r4
edl 8
ono
$5
.41
$*
LAI i"
441
EL
VI O'"
t:15,4"Z"
Analysis o Urbino,
So
Nan
Treatment
112210,
guar
T*tal
inaivid
wit
ti
VIN UP till
1111 NO3
..c.11112
623204
132106
100
NS
NS
adivfdt D.F.
rr5
of V
2
3
1k
15.265
39.101
400,397
*rims.: Barons 9/L0
8
2
4.267
80.667
1k
60
6
TAO
cheek vs. ethers
vs rz
9/10
693.600
150.000
vs
6
60
900.
shook vs. sit 44616
*IF
NS
Tr 3145
965
905
Tr 100
3015
1095
NO 200
7
V
Ti,-.
RopLtaationa
SITOT
Total
,526.67
6,no.ao
14
2
8
2$021ao
114
"146%02
mays.. at Variances Fes VW
14
7,255.83
8
1145132 08
2331.67
114
NI
7/10
a
7,225.
1,653.750
14206167
shook vs. others 6,400.
106.667
aback vs. ct
I vs. II
99,225
9/10
I vs. II
133,225.
22,206167
1
1
1
1.924
ti3
DS
143
14-3
Trsatiesstio
ItspUastions
Error
Teal
57,45743
663.60
603607
614857.60
Is
2
5
14
Indtvi lie DJ?
TAO
°bock vs others
60
I vs. n
6
stook vs.
60
6
9/10
I vs. II
1'19
in if
Trostasnts
Hoplisations
Error
Total
trajdo
7
343
399634
46.700
475%934
114
D
740
shook vs. others
I vs. II
.5n5
58O.7
2.679
1/438