Health Care Alert July 2010 Authors: Richard P. Church richard.church@klgates.com 919.466.1187 Virginia E. Worthy jenny.worthy@klgates.com 704.331.7508 K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing out of 36 offices located in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East, and represents numerous GLOBAL 500, FORTUNE 100, and FTSE 100 corporations, in addition to growth and middle market companies, entrepreneurs, capital market participants and public sector entities. For more information, visit www.klgates.com. Health Care Reform Client Alert Series On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law the comprehensive health care overhaul known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA"), Pub. Law 111-148. 1 This wide-ranging law has far-reaching implications on the financing and delivery of health care in the United States. In addition, it contains substantial changes to federal health care program requirements, including health care fraud and abuse provisions. The following K&L Gates LLP client alert is one in a series of alerts directed to the health care provider and supplier community that are focused on particular implications of PPACA as to the payment and regulation of health care providers and suppliers. Revisions to Medicare and Medicaid Provider/Supplier Enrollment & Billing Requirements PPACA amends Medicare and Medicaid provider/supplier enrollment and billing processes as a means to strengthen program quality and integrity. Specific provisions require: Providers and suppliers to be enrolled pursuant to enhanced screening procedures and requirements. New providers and suppliers to be subject to a provisional period of enhanced oversight. Imposition of civil monetary penalties (“CMPs”) or exclusion for certain false statements, omissions, and misstatements in an enrollment application. Termination of participation in Medicaid if an entity is terminated from Medicare. Providers’ and suppliers’ National Provider Identifier (“NPI”) to be included on: (1) Medicare provider and supplier enrollment applications, (2) Medicaid provider agreements, and (3) all Medicare and Medicaid claims. Physicians and other professionals who order or refer certain items and services for Medicare beneficiaries to be enrolled in the Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System (“PECOS”). 1 On March 30, 2010, President Obama signed the reconciliation bill (H.R. 4872, the “Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010” or “Reconciliation Bill”), which amended PPACA. Health Care Alert Background Leading up to the health care reform debate, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) instituted a number of changes to the provider and supplier enrollment requirements as a means to fight program fraud and abuse. 2 In this regard, Daniel Levinson, Department of Health and Human Services’ (“HHS”) Inspector General articulated the Office of the Inspector General’s (the “OIG”) Five-Principle Strategy for fighting fraud and abuse in testimony to Congress. Item No. 1 was tightening Medicare and Medicaid enrollment. Levinson argued: “Medicare and Medicaid provider enrollment standards and screening should be strengthened, making participation in Federal health care programs as a provider or supplier a privilege, not a right. It is more efficient and effective to protect the programs and beneficiaries from unqualified, fraudulent, or abusive providers and suppliers up front than to try to recover payments or redress fraud or abuse after it occurs. Greater transparency in the enrollment process will help the Government know with whom it is doing business.” 3 Congress responded to this testimony through PPACA with a number of significant changes to the enrollment process and enrollment requirements related to referring professionals for certain Medicare and Medicaid items and services. Enhanced Provider Enrollment Requirements PPACA amends provider/supplier enrollment processes for Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children's Health Insurance Program (“CHIP”) 4 to require enhanced provider screening and disclosure and a provisional period of enhanced oversight. Within 180 days of PPACA’s enactment, the Secretary of HHS must develop a provider screening process, which may be implemented via interim final rulemaking. This process must include a licensure check and may include criminal background checks, fingerprinting, unannounced site visits (including pre-enrollment site visits), database checks (including checks in other states), and any other screening the Secretary of HHS deems appropriate. 5 As to providers and suppliers not enrolled as of the date of PPACA’s enactment, the enhanced screening procedures will be effective one year from PPACA’s enactment date (March 23, 2011); for providers and suppliers enrolled as of PPACA’s enactment, the enhanced screening will be effective two years from PPACA’s enactment date (March 23, 2012); provided, however, if such provider or supplier is due for a revalidation of enrollment, such enhanced screening shall be effective as to revalidations beginning 180 days from PPACA’s enactment date (September 19, 2010). Beginning one year from PPACA’s enactment date (March 23, 2011), providers and suppliers undergoing either a new enrollment or enrollment revalidations must also disclose “any current or previous affiliation (directly or indirectly)” with a provider or supplier that: 2 For example, CMS implemented accreditation and surety bond requirements for Durable Medical Equipment (“DME”) suppliers and a prohibition on the assumption of Medicare provider agreements for home health agencies (“HHAs”) having undergone a change or transfer of ownership in the past thirty-six months. See 74 Fed. Reg. 166 (Jan. 2, 2009); 74 Fed. Reg. 58,078 (Nov. 10, 2009). In addition, CMS amended the effective date of physician billing privileges and clarified its handling of effective dates as to other enrollment applications. See 73 Fed. Reg. 69,726 (Nov. 19, 2008); 75 Fed. Reg. 23,852 (proposed May 4, 2010). 3 D. Levinson, Testimony before House Subcommittee on Health, Health Care Reform; Opportunities to Address Waste, Fraud and Abuse (June 25, 2009). 4 Pursuant to Section 6401(b), PPACA mandates that state Medicaid plans and CHIP include the provisions discussed herein regarding enhanced provider screening, initial oversight, additional disclosure requirements regarding affiliated entities, temporary enrollment moratoriums imposed by HHS, and compliance programs. Pursuant to Section 6502 of PPACA, state Medicaid plans must also be amended to exclude from participation those entities or individuals that own, control, or manage an entity that (1) has unpaid overpayments, (2) is suspended or excluded from participation, or (3) is affiliated with an individual or entity that has been suspended or excluded from participation. 5 See PPACA § 6401(a)(3). July 2010 2 Health Care Alert Has uncollected debt. 6 Has been subject to payment suspension under a federal health care program. Has been excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP. Has had its billing privileges denied or revoked (presumably as to Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP). If HHS determines a provider’s or supplier’s previous or current affiliations pose an undue risk of fraud, waste, or abuse, the enrollment or revalidation application may be denied. 7 Upon a timeline to be determined in HHS’s discretion per provider or supplier type, PPACA makes the establishment of a corporate compliance plan a condition of enrollment in Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP. HHS is directed to define the “core elements” of a conforming plan by industry or category, although it is expected that these core elements would follow prior OIG guidance regarding model compliance program elements. 8 Based on the level of risk associated with a provider or supplier, the Secretary of HHS is also authorized to require a provider or supplier (except physicians) to present a surety bond in an amount (not less than $50,000) that the Secretary determines is commensurate with the volume of the provider’s or supplier’s billings. With regard to existing DME and HHA surety bond requirements, HHS must take into account the volume of billing when determining the appropriate amount of the surety bond requirement (which again shall not be less than $50,000 in any instance). 9 Finally, upon enrollment in Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP, PPACA mandates HHS develop a provisional 6 PPACA does not specify to whom such uncollected debt would be owed. Presumably this provision will be limited via rule making to outstanding debt in the form of refunds or other funds owed to a federal health care program. However, based on the statutory language alone it is potentially subject to broader application. 7 See id. 8 See id. 9 See id. § 6402(g). period of enhanced oversight for new providers or suppliers. Such enhanced oversight shall be for a period of 30 days to one year and may include such programs as pre-payment review or payment caps. 10 Beginning January 1, 2011, if the Secretary of HHS determines there is a significant risk of fraudulent activity among suppliers of DME in a particular area, the Secretary may withhold payment of claims for a 90-day period from the first claim submitted by such a new DME supplier. 11 In order to fund this enhanced enrollment program, PPACA also institutes application fees for institutional provider and supplier enrollments of $500 in 2010, with a percentage increase equal to the change in the consumer price index for each subsequent year. The Secretary of HHS may waive the fee on a case-by-case basis if the imposition of the application fee would result in hardship or would impede beneficiary access to care as to a state Medicaid program. 12 Combating Fraud and Abuse in the Enrollment Process PPACA expands the scope of CMPs to include penalties for knowingly making or causing to be made a false statement, omission, or misrepresentation of a material fact in an enrollment application to a federal health care program. 13 Liability for such acts shall be $50,000 for each false statement or omission and assessment of not more than three times the total amount claimed for each item or service on which payment was made based on such false application. In addition, such acts are grounds for permissive exclusion from further participation in federal health care programs. 14 Under PPACA, HHS is also authorized to impose temporary moratoriums on new provider or supplier enrollments in Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP, including a moratorium on enrollment of whole categories of providers or suppliers, if HHS deems 10 See id. § 6401(a)(3). See Reconciliation Bill § 1304. 12 See PPACA §§ 6401(a)(3), 10603. 13 See id. § 6402(d)(2). 14 See id. § 6402(d)(1). 11 July 2010 3 Health Care Alert such moratorium necessary to prevent or combat fraud, waste, or abuse. These moratoriums will be at the discretion of the Secretary of HHS and are not subject to judicial review under the language found in PPACA.15 Finally, PPACA mandates that state Medicaid plans terminate any individual or entity from state Medicaid participation if such individual or entity is terminated from Medicare or another state’s Medicaid program.16 Enrollment Requirements Related to Medicare Billing PPACA also mandates various enrollment requirements related to billing for Medicare and Medicaid items and services. 17 On May 5, 2010, CMS issued an interim final rule with comment period addressing several of these PPACA mandated enrollment billing changes, all of which became effective July 6, 2010. 18 The rule requires Medicare and Medicaid participating providers or suppliers to include their NPI on all enrollment applications, provider agreements, and claims. As to claims, all identified providers/suppliers must have their NPI included (i.e., billing entity as well as, e.g., referring physician). 19 A Medicaid or Medicare claim submitted by a provider/supplier that does not contain the required NPI(s) will be rejected. However, a claim submitted by a beneficiary may still be submitted without the NPI as long as the claim contains the valid legal name of the health care provider and the referring or ordering physician meets the PECOS enrollment requirements 15 See id. § 6401(a)(3). See id.§ 6501. 17 See id. §§ 6402(a), 6401(b), 6405. 18 See 75 Fed. Reg. 24,437 (May 5, 2010) (42 C.F.R. pts. 424 and 431). 19 See 42 C.F.R. 424.506. Prior to PPACA’s enactment, Medicare required NPIs from providers and suppliers with regard to both enrollment applications and Medicare claims. In 2008, Medicaid began requiring providers report NPIs on all Medicaid claims. The interim rule codifies these preexisting practices and mandates that states obtain NPIs on Medicaid enrollment applications for the first time. See 75 Fed. Reg. at 24,440. 16 identified below. 20 Providers and suppliers that enrolled prior to obtaining an NPI (and the NPI is not in their enrollment record) are required to report the NPI to Medicare in an enrollment application. 21 The rule also requires physicians and professionals who order or refer covered Medicare durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (“DMEPOS”), home health, laboratory services, imaging services, or specialist services to be enrolled in PECOS. 22 Medicare contractors may deny a claim if the ordering or referring supplier is not enrolled in PECOS (provided the supplier has not opted out of the Medicare program, in which case they will have an opt-out record in PECOS that will suffice). To avoid claim denials, suppliers and HHA providers will need to ensure that those physicians and other professionals from whom they accept orders or referrals have enrolled in PECOS, which requires the provision of updated information in a CMS Form 855 enrollment application. 23 CMS suggests that generally physicians and other referring professionals that enrolled more than six years ago (and have not had reason to update their enrollment record during that time) will not be enrolled in PECOS, which was implemented in 2003. If physicians are not in PECOS, they will need to submit a paper enrollment application to the applicable Medicare contractor or enroll electronically via the Internet. 24 20 See 42 C.F.R. § 424.507. See id. § 424.506(b)(2). 22 See id. § 424.507. 23 This information can be found at: http://www.cms.gov/MedicareProviderSupEnroll/06_Medicare OrderingandReferring.asp#TopOfPage. 24 The interim rule also addresses documentation issues related to such referrals not related specifically to enrollment status. Under the rule, the billing entity and referring physician must maintain ordering and referring documentation and make the same available to CMS or its contractor for at least seven years from the date of the order or referral DMEPOS, home health, laboratory services, imaging services, and specialist services. See PPACA § 6406; 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(f). As to DME and HHA items and services, PPACA also makes it a condition of payment that such services are accompanied by a face-to-face encounter with the patient during the six-month period preceding any written order by the referring physician. See PPACA § 6407. 21 July 2010 4 Health Care Alert Notwithstanding the July 6, 2010 effective date, on June 30, 2010, amid concerns over PECOS enrollment difficulties, CMS announced that it would delay rejecting claims based on orders, certifications, and referrals made by suppliers that have attempted to enroll but have not had an application approved by the July 6, 2010 effective date. Although the effective date of the regulation will remain July 6, 2010, CMS indicated contractors would not reject claims on such orders and referrals until an as yet to be determined date. Further, CMS suggested it would use a “contingency plan” to meet the PPACA requirement that it only pay claims referred by eligible professionals after July 1, 2010. PPACA imposes a similar requirement for orders or referrals subject to the Medicaid program. PPACA mandates any ordering or referring physicians or professionals be enrolled as a participating provider under the state plan or a waiver program. The NPI of the ordering or referring physician must also be specified on any claim for payment based on the referral or order. 25 Next Steps Providers and suppliers should begin taking action now in light of the various changes occurring or contemplated in the various enrollment-related PPACA changes. In light of existing guidance from the OIG recommending health care entities adopt compliance plans and providing model forms as to the same, providers or suppliers that do not have such plans or have not recently updated their compliance plan may wish to begin preparing or reviewing the same now. Likewise, notwithstanding the temporary delay in the PECOS enrollment requirement, Medicare suppliers and home health providers should insure that each referring physician has a valid PECOS enrollment or has attempted to enroll from this date forward to insure that claims for services will be paid. Finally, providers and suppliers should stay tuned for further guidance from CMS and state Medicaid agencies regarding the implementation of the various enhanced screening and enrollment requirements. 25 For additional information, please contact: Boston Paul W. Shaw 617.261.3111 paul.shaw@klgates.com Harrisburg Ruth E. Granfors 717.231.5835 ruth.granfors@klgates.com Miami William J. Spratt 305.539.3320 william.spratt@klgates.com Newark Stephen A. Timoni 973.848.4020 stephen.timoni@klgates.com Pittsburgh Edward V. Weisgerber 412.355.8980 ed.weisgerber@klgates.com Research Triangle Park Richard P. Church 919.466.1187 richard.church@kglates.com Mary Beth Johnston 919.466.1181 marybeth.johnston@klgates.com See PPACA § 6401(b). July 2010 5 Health Care Alert Anchorage Austin Beijing Berlin Boston Charlotte Chicago Dallas Dubai Fort Worth Frankfurt Harrisburg Hong Kong London Los Angeles Miami Moscow Newark New York Orange County Palo Alto Paris Pittsburgh Portland Raleigh Research Triangle Park San Diego San Francisco Seattle Shanghai Singapore Spokane/Coeur d’Alene Taipei Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing out of 36 offices located in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East, and represents numerous GLOBAL 500, FORTUNE 100, and FTSE 100 corporations, in addition to growth and middle market companies, entrepreneurs, capital market participants and public sector entities. For more information, visit www.klgates.com. K&L Gates is comprised of multiple affiliated entities: a limited liability partnership with the full name K&L Gates LLP qualified in Delaware and maintaining offices throughout the United States, in Berlin and Frankfurt, Germany, in Beijing (K&L Gates LLP Beijing Representative Office), in Dubai, U.A.E., in Shanghai (K&L Gates LLP Shanghai Representative Office), in Tokyo, and in Singapore; a limited liability partnership (also named K&L Gates LLP) incorporated in England and maintaining offices in London and Paris; a Taiwan general partnership (K&L Gates) maintaining an office in Taipei; a Hong Kong general partnership (K&L Gates, Solicitors) maintaining an office in Hong Kong; a Polish limited partnership (K&L Gates Jamka sp. k.) maintaining an office in Warsaw; and a Delaware limited liability company (K&L Gates Holdings, LLC) maintaining an office in Moscow. K&L Gates maintains appropriate registrations in the jurisdictions in which its offices are located. A list of the partners or members in each entity is available for inspection at any K&L Gates office. This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer. ©2010 K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved. July 2010 6