Lecture 16 Schwarzschild orbits 16.1 Newtonian orbits

advertisement

Lecture 16

Schwarzschild orbits

Objectives:

• Planetary motion

Reading: Schutz, 11; Hobson 9; Rindler 11

16.1

Newtonian orbits

Figure: Newtonian effective potential: centrifugal barrier always wins

• Centrifugal barrier always dominates as r → 0

• 2 types of orbits: unbound, hyperbolic E > 0; bound, elliptical E < 0.

64

LECTURE 16.

SCHWARZSCHILD ORBITS 65

• Circular: ˙ = 0, r = r

C such that ¨ = 0 = ⇒ dV /dr = V ′ ( r ) = 0.

• Newtonian elliptical orbits do not precess.

To see last point, expand potential around r = r

C

:

V ( r ) ≈ V ( r c

) +

1

2

V ′′ ( r

C

)( r − r

C

) 2 .

cf potential/unit mass of a spring kx 2 / 2 m , then r must oscillate with angular frequency (“epicyclic frequency”)

ω r

2 = V ′′ ( r

C

) .

Given the Newtonian effective potential h 2

V ( r ) =

2 r 2 so

V ′ ( r

C

) = 0 = ⇒ h 2

− h 2

V ′ ( r ) = r 3

= GM r

C

, therefore

GM r

,

+

GM

.

r 2

V ′′ ( r

C

) =

3 h r 4

C

2

2 GM r 3

C

=

GM

.

r 3

C

However, ω 2

φ

= GM/r 3

C

, thus same φ , so no precession.

ω r

= ω

φ

.

= ⇒ always reach minimum r at

16.2

Schwarzschild orbits

Case 1. Large angular momentum h Reminder:

V ( r ) = h 2

2 r 2

¡ 1 −

2 µ r

¢

µc 2 r

.

Units of h on plots are µc .

Figure: Schwarzschild effective potential for a large values of h

LECTURE 16.

SCHWARZSCHILD ORBITS

• Essentially Newtonian behaviour as small r is inaccessible.

• This case applies to the planets. e.g. for Earth h ≈ 10 4 µc .

Case 2. Intermediate angular momentum h

66

Figure: Schwarzschild effective potential for an intermediate value of h

• Bound near-elliptical and circular orbits still exist

• Qualitatively different capture orbits possible.

Case 3. Low angular momentum h

Figure: Schwarzschild effective potential for a low value of h

LECTURE 16.

SCHWARZSCHILD ORBITS

• No bound orbits.

67

16.2.1

Instability of circular orbits

The Schwarzschild effective potential is

V ( r ) = h 2

2 r 2

µ

1 −

2 µ ¶

− r

µc 2

.

r

At the radius of circular orbits, dV ( r ) /dr = V ′ ( r ) = 0 = ⇒

V ′ ( r ) = − h 2 r 3

+

3 h 2 µ

+ r 4

µc 2 r 2

= 0 , or

µc 2 r 2

− h 2 r + 3 h 2 µ = 0 , so r

C

= h 2

± p h 4 − 12 h 2 µ 2 c 2

.

2 µc 2

The smaller root is a maximum of V and unstable. The larger root is stable while h 2 > 12 µ

At this point

2 c 2 , but once h 2 ≤ 12 µ 2 c 2 there are no more stable circular orbits.

r

C

=

2 h 2

µc 2

= 6 µ =

6 GM c 2

= 3 R

S

.

In accretion discs around non-rotating black-holes no more energy is available from within this radius. Calculate energy lost using E = kmc 2 .

Since ˙ = 0, r = 6 µ and h 2 = 12 µ 2 c 2 : c 2 2 ( k

C

− 1) = h r

2

2

µ

1 −

2 µ ¶

− r

2 µc 2

, r

12 µ 2 c 2

=

36 µ 2

= −

1

9 c 2 .

µ

1 −

2 ¶

6

2 c 2

,

6

Thus k 2

C

= 8 / 9. A mass dropped from rest at r = ∞ starts with k = 1, and thus 1 − k

C

= 5 .

7 % of the rest mass must be lost to radiation. Compare cf “Newtonian” with ∼ 0 .

7 % H → He fusion.

value of

Accretion power from black-holes is thus a conservative hypothesis in many cases as it requires much less fuel than fusion, e.g. 1 star per week rather than

7 or 8. Rotating black-holes can be more efficient still, with a maximum of

GM/ 6 R

S

=

1 / 12 = 8 .

3%.

42% (Kerr metrics). In realistic cases it is thought that about 30% efficiency is possible.

Download