Occupation probabilities for coalescing (annihilating) Brownian motions on R Roger Tribe and Oleg Zaboronski Department of Mathematics, University of Warwick Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 1/14 Plan Quantities Coalescing (annihilating) Brownian motions (CABM) Review of known results The main result for occupation probabilities Structures Pfaffian representation for occupation probabilities Duality and the maximal entrance law Pfaffian point processes and CABM Conclusions Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 2/14 CABM’s Particles perform independent Brownian motions on R until they meet At the moment of collision particles instantly coagulate. The aggregate follows a Brownian path with the same diffusion rate Thinning relation: D A under PΘ(Ω) = Θ(Xti ) underPΩC (Xti ) Proof :Colouring The main object of interest: ρn (t, x1 , . . . , xn )dx1 . . . dxn the probability of finding n particles in dx1 , . . . , dxn at time t Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 3/14 Mean field analysis ’Chemist’: Aggregation rate is proportional to the number of pairs of particles within the interaction range Hence the rate equation: ∂t ρ1 (t) = −λ(r, D)ρ1 (t)2 Solution: ρ1 (t) ∼ 1 t Implicit mean field assumption: ρn (t) ∼ ρ1 (t)n Consequently, ρn ∼ 1 tn Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 4/14 The breakdown of mean field theory: anti-correlations Mean field Spatially extended 1.4 1.2 PM(x)/ <PM> 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 x/ ∆ x (Monte-Carlo simulations on Z. Courtesy of Colm Connaughton) Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 5/14 Known rigorous results for t → ∞ d=1 ρ1 (t) ∼ 1 √ t (Bramson-Griffeath, Z, 1980; Bramson-Lebowitz, 1988) Exact expression for ρn (t) for all t’s using empty interval method in the form of the sum of products of duffusive Greens’ functions with alternating signs. (ben-Avraham, 1998) d≥2 For d = 2, ρ1 (t) ∼ ln(t) t (Bramson-Lebowitz, 1988) For d > 2, ρ1 (t) ∼ 1 t (Bramson-Lebowitz, 1988; van den Berg and Kesten, finite reaction rates, 2002) Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 6/14 Predictions from (non-rigorous) renormalization group analysis n(n−1) n −2− 4 d = 1 t n(n−1) n ln t − 2 ρn(t) ∼ (ln t) d = 2 t t−n d>2 Note the non-linear dependence of the scaling exponent on n in d = 1 Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 7/14 Multi-scaling of occupation probabilities Theorem 1 Under the maximal entrance law for C(A)BM’s, (2n) x −n sup ρt (x1 , x2 , . . . , x2n ) − cn t ∆2n √ → 0 as t → ∞, t |xi |<<t1/2 ∆2n (x) = Q ABM = (x − x ) , c i j n 1≤i<j≤2n 1 CBM 4 n cn IC’s: Maximal entrance law initial conditions (Arratia, 1981): ’one particle per site’ at t = 0 - as in Brownian web Construction: Poisson(λ) initial distribution with λ → ∞ Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 8/14 Pfaffians and interacting particle systems Theorem 2 Consider a system of ABM’s with 2n particles at t = 0, x1 < x2 < . . . x2n . Then the product moment Q (2n) A i mt (x1 , . . . , x2n ) = E(x1 ,...,xn ) i∈It g(Xt ) is given by the Pfaffian of an 2n × 2n antisymmetric matrix: (2n) (2) mt (x1 , . . . , x2n ) = P f (−1)χ(j>i) mt (xi , xj ) (2n) Proof. mt (x1 , . . . , x2n ) solves heat equation on the cell (2n) (2n−2) x1 < x2 < . . . x2n ⊂ R2n . BC’s: mt |xi =xi+1 = mt . IC’s: Q2n (2n) m0 = k=1 g(xk ). Pfaffian solves the equation and satisfies IC’s, BC’s. The theorem follows by uniqueness Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 9/14 Coalescing Brownian motions and Pfaffians CBM-ABM duality (Arratia) for the maximal entrance law: C A P∞ [Nt [a1 , a2 ] = 0 . . . Nt [a2n−1 , a2n ] = 0] = P(a (τ < t) i) The right hand side is the Pfaffian of (Brownian hitting prob) Proof: set g ≡ 0 in Thm 2 (A) Pai ,aj (τ < t) Conclusion: empty interval probabilities are Pfaffians Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 10/14 CBM’s and Pfaffian point processes. Theorem 3 Under the maximal entrance law for coalescing Brownian motions, the particle positions at time t form a Pfaffian point process with kernel t−1/2 K(xt−1/2 , yt−1/2 ), where ! −F ′′ (y − x) −F ′ (y − x) K(x, y) = F ′ (y − x) sgn(y − x)F (|y − x|) π −1/2 R∞ 2 −z e /4 dz . and F (x) = (Here sgn(z) = 1 for z > 0, x sgn(z) = −1 for z < 0 and sgn(0) = 0.) Proof: Differentiate the pfaffian expression for empty interval probabilities with respect to right end points. Closing the loop: Theorem 1 follows from the large-t expansion of the pfaffian formulae for ρn ’s Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 11/14 CABM’s and random matrices Corollary 4 KtABM (x, y) 1 Ginibre = √ Krr 2t x y √ ,√ 2t 2t , Ginibre is the N → ∞ limit of the Kernel of the where Krr Pfaffian point process characterising the law of real eigenvalues in the real Ginibre(N ) ensemble, 1 − 21 T r(MT M) µN (dM) = λN ×N (dM) 2 /2 e N (2π) (Ginibre, Edelman, Sommers, Akemann, Forrester, Sinclair, Borodin, ...) Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 12/14 Conclusions Mean field approximation in d = 1 is invalidated by strong negative correlations between the particles Multi-point probability densities exhibit quadratic multi-scaling One-dimensional occupation densities in CBM’s are a Pfaffian point process The same process describes occupation densities of real eigenvalues in N → ∞ limit of real Ginibre matrix ensemble Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 13/14 Open questions, references Is there a relation between CABM’s and the GL(N )-valued Brownian Motions? ("Ginibre process"). Conjecture presented in [2] incorrect Rigorous derivation of logarithmic corrections in d = 2? References: 1. Multi-Scaling of the n-Point Density Function for Coalescing Brownian Motions , CMP Vol. 268, No. 3, December 2006; 2. Pfaffian formulae for one dimensional coalescing and annihilating systems, arXiv Math.PR: 1009.4565; EJP, vol. 16, Article 76 (2011) Warwick, 19.03.2012 – p. 14/14