ITU Workshop on Tariff Policies, Tariff Models

advertisement
ITU Workshop on Tariff Policies, Tariff Models
and Methodologies for the determination of
costs of services provided with NGN
Geneva, September 8, 2008
The Architecture of NGN and
ITU-D SG2 Q19-1/2 on
“migration from existing networks to NGN
for developing countries”
Souheil Marine
Digital Bridge Manager, Alcatel-Lucent
Rapporteur of ITU-D SG2 Question 19-1/2
International
Telecommunication
Union
Presentation Outline
ƒ NGN and its « building blocks »
ƒ A view of ITU-T proposed migration scenarios
ƒ Q19-1/2
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
2
Why NGN… After All ?
ƒ NGN will not come as a sudden thunder in a blue sky !
ƒ Essential “building blocks”:
¾
¾
¾
¾
Voice over IP
Broadband access
Multiple Services with Broadband access (triple play,…)
And…in many developing countries the necessity to have a
national backbone with enough capability
ƒ NGN architecture is a « natural consequence » of the
above building blocks:
¾ It systemizes and generalizes the offer of any service from a single
network over any kind of access and,..
¾ It dramatically improves overall network efficiency and reduces
OPEX costs
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
3
Building Blocks (1): Voice over IP
ƒ Voice over IP is no more a « hacker’s gadget » to
circumvent « regular » voice service at a cheaper price!
¾ Offered with broadband access with the same quality of service and using
a legacy numbering plan (E.164)
¾ Offered by newcomers as well as incumbents
¾ Largely used for long distance traffic
¾ Robust SoftSwitch technology
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
4
Building Blocks (2): Broadband Access
ƒ Universal broadband access is now available in many
technological flavors:
¾ Wireline: DSL, Fiber, Cable
¾ Wireless: 2G+, 3G and WiMAX with ultimately LTE 4G
ƒ Do not discard any technology !
¾ Pragmatic approach adapted to local needs and context
¾ Wireless for rural/suburban areas but also urban areas for mobile
broadband (high-end users)
¾ Wireline when copper is available (DSL) but also for new buildings
and neighborhoods (Fiber)
ƒ Rule of thumb: at any given time the best wireline access
provides 10x bandwidth of the best wireless access
¾ Radio is wonderful but it is a limited and scarce resource!
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
5
Building Blocks (3.1): Triple play
and…more
ƒ Broadband “access pipe” leveraged to provide TV and Voice in
addition to Internet access
¾ Recent development of Quad-play involving mobile access when
subscribers leaves his home network
¾ And…likely more to come
ƒ Triple-play is above all an innovative marketing to develop
broadband take-up among « non-techie » customers seeking a
good bargain for their “global telecom bill”:
¾ Example: figure of 29.99€/month all inclusive in France!
ƒ High Definition TV seen as the lever for FTTH/x
ƒ Triple-play is the first step towards a multi-service NGN-like
architecture
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
6
Building Blocks (3.2): Triple play
and…more
ƒ Sample technical architecture
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
7
Building Blocks (4.1): Backbones
ƒ The planet is full of International Fiber Submarine cables
and the sector is booming with new projects!
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
8
Building Blocks (4.2): Backbones
ƒ But the « devil hides in the details » and the crux is the lack of a
national (Fiber) Backbone in many developing countries!
ƒ Possible solution:
¾ Infrastructure sharing on the basis of an “open access model” to develop
national Fiber Backbone in developing countries
¾ Open access means that the owner of the “bottleneck facility” does not
compete in the downstream market
ƒ Sharing could take place at any level of the Fiber:
¾ Physical: Ducts, Poles, Dark Fiber, RF Channels
¾ Transport: ATM PVC, Ethernet VLANs
¾ Services: VPNs
ƒ For more details see discussion paper at ITU’s 8th GSR
¾ http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/treg/Events/Seminars/GSR/GSR08/papers.html
(paper N° 2).
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
9
NGN Architecture: A bit of History
ƒ Introduced first by 3GPP for 3G mobile (UMTS)
networks: IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS).
¾ Release 5 of UMTS specifications
ƒ Extended to xDSL fixed access by ETSI TISPAN
architecture
¾ Release 1 of TISPAN architecture
ƒ Work on ITU-T that leverage and generalizes the above
efforts with a more ambitious and telecom-minded
perspective
¾ Release 1 of ITU-T NGN architecture
ƒ All architectures share the same principles of layered
separation between transport and control.
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
10
NGN Architecture: Functional view of
ITU-T Release 1
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
11
Presentation Outline
ƒ NGN and its « building blocks »
ƒ A view of ITU-T proposed migration scenarios
ƒ Q19-1/2
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
12
Some Terminology
ƒ Evolution to NGN: A process in which whole or parts of
the existing networks are replaced or upgraded to the
corresponding NGN components providing similar or
better functionality, while attempting to maintain the
services provided by the original network and the
possibility of additional capabilities
¾ From ITU-T specification Y.2261: PSTN/ISDN Evolution to
NGN.
ƒ Migration to NGN synonymous to evolution to NGN
ƒ SoftSwitch and Call Server terms synonymous
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
13
The NGN Migration Problematic
ƒ Developing countries characterized by:
¾
¾
¾
¾
Growth of their voice service market
Dilemma to grow with legacy PSTN/ISDN or with NGN
Inter-working with existing legacy equipment
Seamless continuity of services
ƒ Plus the possibilities offered through NGN migration to
grow new markets (broadband, triple-play) and enrich
infrastructure competition between distinct access
platforms
ƒ Need for a phased approach for operators with existing
legacy equipment
¾ Example scenarios from specification Y.2261
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
14
Migration Scenarios Envisaged by Y.2261
ƒ Call Server (SoftSwitch) based approach of the Core
network with three variants (scenarios):
¾ Scenario 1: Migration starts from Local Exchanges (LE)
¾ Scenario 2: Migration starts from Transit Exchanges (TE)
¾ Scenario 3: One-step approach
ƒ One step evolution of the core network to IP
Multimedia Subsystem (IMS)
ƒ xDSL Access network evolution to NGN
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
15
Core network consolidation before migration
ƒ Reduce number of LE and transfer of affected user access modules (UAM), Private
Automatic Branch Exchanges (PABX) and Access Network to remaining LEs.
UAM
AN
UAM
P S T N /IS D N
LE
LE
PABX
PABX
TE
UAM
AN
AN
TE
TE
UAM
LE
LE
AN
PABX
PABX
UAM
UAM
AN
LE
P S T N /IS D N
PABX
RUAM
LE
AN
PABX
TE
TE
TE
RUAM
AN
AN
PABX
PABX
V o ic e
S ig n a ll in g
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
16
ƒ Step 1
Scenario 1: Migration from LE
¾ Some of the LEs are replaced by Access Gateways (AG) controlled by a
Call Server (CS).
¾ Access elements originally connected to the removed LEs, are now
directly connected to AGs : PABXs and Access Nodes (AN).
¾ User Access Modules Functionality (UAM) assumed by AG and CS.
¾ Trunking Media Gateways (TMG) and Signaling Gateways (SG) are
deployed for interconnection between the PSN and the TEs of the legacy
network as well as other operators' PSTNs/ISDNs.
¾ AGs and TMGs are all controlled by the CS.
ƒ Step 2
¾ Remaining LEs are replaced by the AGs,
¾ Transit Exchanges (TE)s are removed and their control functions are
performed by CS.
¾ TMGs and SGs are deployed for interconnection between PSN and other
operators' PSTNs/ISDNs.
¾ AGs and TMGs are all controlled by the CS.
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
17
UAM
AN
UAM
LE
P S T N /IS D N
AN
LE
PABX
PABX
TE
UAM
AN
TE
TE
UAM
AN
LE
LE
PABX
PABX
P S T N /IS D N
UAM
AN
LE
TE
TE
UAM
TE
LE
PABX
AN
PABX
CS
TM G
SG
P a c k e t S w itc h e d
N e tw o rk
TM G
AN
AN
AG
AG
PABX
AG
PABX
CS
AN
AG
AG
PABX
AN
PABX
PABX
P a c k e t S w itc h e d
N e tw o rk
AG
AG
TM G
SG
AN
PABX
B e a r e r a n d S ig n a llin g t r a f f ic f r o m
o t h e r o p e ra to r ’s P S T N
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
AN
V o ic e
S ig n a llin g
D a ta
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
18
Scenario 2: Migration from TE
ƒ Step 1
¾ All TE functions are performed by the TMGs and the SGs under the
control of the CS.
¾ LEs are connected to the Packet Switched Network (PSN) via TMGs
and SGs.
¾ TMGs & SGs are deployed for interconnection between PSN and other
operators’ PSTNs/ISDNs.
¾ AGs & TMGs are all controlled by CS.
ƒ Step 2
¾ All LEs are replaced by AG controlled by CS
¾ Access elements originally connected to the removed LEs, are now
directly connected to AGs : PABXs and Access Nodes (AN).
¾ User Access Modules Functionality (UAM) assumed by AG and CS.
¾ TMGs & SGs are deployed for interconnection between PSN and other
operators’ PSTNs/ISDNs.
¾ AGs & TMGs are all controlled by CS.
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
19
UAM
UAM
AN
P S T N /IS D N
LE
AN
LE
PABX
PABX
TE
UAM
AN
TE
TE
UAM
AN
LE
LE
PABX
PABX
UAM
UAM
CS
AN
LE
SG
SG
PABX
LE
PABX
P a c k e t S w it c h e d
N e tw o r k
UAM
LE
TM G
TM G
LE
AN
UAM
AN
SG
TM G
AN
PABX
PABX
B e a r e r a n d S ig n a l l i n g t r a f f i c f r o m
o t h e r o p e r a t o r ’s P S T N
CS
AG
PABX
AN
PABX
AG
AG
AG
P a c k e t S w it c h e d
N e tw o rk
AG
AG
TM G
SG
B e a r e r a n d S ig n a llin g tr a ff ic f r o m
o th e r o p e ra t o r ’s P S T N
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
PABX
AN
PABX
V o ic e
S ig n a llin g
D a ta
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
20
Scenario 3: One-Step Approach
ƒ LEs are replaced by the AGs and their functions are transferred
to the AGs and the CS.
ƒ All access elements such as user access modules (UAMs), remote
user access modules (RUAMs), and private automatic branch
exchanges (PABXs) are connected to access gateways (AGs).
ƒ The access networks (ANs) are either replaced by the access
gateways (AGs) or are connected to packet based network (PBN)
through the AGs.
ƒ Transit gateways (TMGs) under the control of the call server (CS),
and the signalling gateways (SGs), are deployed to replace the TE
functions and provide interconnection between PSN and other
operators’ PSTNs/ISDNs.
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
21
UAM
UAM
AN
P S T N /IS D N
LE
AN
LE
PABX
PABX
TE
UAM
AN
TE
TE
UAM
AN
LE
LE
PABX
PABX
CS
AG
PABX
AN
PABX
AG
AG
AG
P a c k e t S w itc h e d
N e tw o rk
AG
AG
TM G
SG
B e a r e r a n d S ig n a llin g t r a f f ic f r o m
o t h e r o p e r a t o r ’s P S T N
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
PABX
AN
PABX
V o ic e
S ig n a llin g
D a ta
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
22
IMS-based evolution to NGN
ƒ PSTN/ISDN evolves directly to a PSN based on the IMS core
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
network architecture.
End-users access the network using NGN user equipment or
legacy user equipment connected via an AG.
Transit and signalling gateways (TMGs & SGs) are deployed for
interconnection between the NGN and other operators’
PSTNs/ISDNs.
Concurrent CS-based and IMS-based evolution to NGN
implementations can occur when an existing operator deploys a
separate IMS-based network for new services and supports the
remainder of the services using a CS-based approach.
These two types of network implementations need to interoperate.
Interoperation is possible if SIP is used, but this is beyond the
scope of recommendation Y.2261.
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
23
U AM
U AM
AN
LE
P S T N /IS D N
LE
P AB X
AN
P AB X
TE
U AM
AN
TE
TE
U AM
LE
LE
P AB X
AN
P AB X
AN
IM S
AG
P AB X
AN
AG
P AB X
V o ic e
P a c k e t S w itc h e d
N e tw o rk
TM G
S ig n a llin g
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
SG
V o IP
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
24
What remains of the PSTN/ISDN services:
Emulation or Simulation ?
ƒ Emulation refers to the Provision of most of the existing
PSTN/ISDN service capabilities and interfaces using
adaptation to an IP infrastructure.
¾ Only a sub-set of PSTN/ISDN could be supported.
ƒ Simulation refers to the same service provision as above
but there is no guarantee that all features are provided.
¾ New features and capabilities may be provided with respect to
legacy PSTN/ISDN.
ƒ Specification Y.2262 specifies two types of adaptation
functions (ADF) for legacy access equipment
¾ ADF1 for simulation
¾ ADF2 for emulation
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
25
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
26
Emulation is complex:
Call Server-based PSTN/ISDN Emulation Service
(CS-PES) Components
ƒ Access Call Server (ACS)
¾ Controls Access Gateways (AG), subscriber registration and call control
ƒ Breakout Call Server (BCS)
¾ Controls Trunking Media Gateways (TMG)to interwork with
PSTN/ISDN
ƒ IMS Call Server (ICS)
¾ Controls interconnection Border Gateway to interwork with Packetbased networks (NGN, IP Multimedia, Internet)
ƒ Gateway Call Server (GCS)
¾ Ensures interoperability between among CS-PESs to provide end-to-end
services
ƒ Routing Call Server (RCS)
¾ Provides routing function between call servers
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
27
Emulation Call Server
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
28
Presentation Outline
ƒ NGN and its « building blocks »
ƒ A view of ITU-T proposed migration scenarios
ƒ Q19-1/2
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
29
Question 19: History
ƒ First established during study period 2002-2006 and reconducted for the 2006-2010 period
ƒ Renewed interest from ITU member countries:
¾ Cross-cutting theme in most of BDT programs (WTDC-06, Doha)
¾ Resolutions 101 and GT-PLEN/3 at PP-06 in Antalya
ƒ But… dramatic lack of contributions and participation of
developing countries delegates to the Question’s meetings !
¾
¾
¾
¾
Lack of expertise ?!
Lack of awareness of the question’s urgency ?!
Lack of resources allocated to NGN issues ?!
Probably a mixture of all of the above !
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
30
Question 19: Agenda and Expected
Outcomes
ƒ Agenda
¾
¾
¾
¾
Trends of Telecommunication networks
Examination of NGN technologies
Methodologies and Planning
Migration solutions to NGN
ƒ Outcomes
¾ Yearly progress report
¾ Report on methodologies and planning
¾ Set of guidelines for migration from existing networks to NGN
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
31
Achievements to Date
ƒ An analysis of NGN technology and migration
¾ Chapter 3 « NGN technologies » of ITU « Trends in Telecom Reform: The road
to Next Generation Networks »
ƒ A Questionnaire sent to administrations and sector members
¾ See http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/CDS/gq/sgq19-1-2.html
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
32
Q19 Questionnaire (Posted April 2008):
Broadband Access
ƒ Broadband DSL:
¾ What is the status of DSL deployment in your country/network
(number and geographical distribution) ?
¾ Are there any unbundling obligations for the last mile copper
access ?
ƒ Specify type of unbundling: full, line sharing, bit stream
ƒ Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) and Fiber:
¾ Have you deployed or is there any plan to deploy BWA or
Fiber ?
¾ If yes, what are the targeted areas for each and nature of enduser services ?
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
33
Q19 Questionnaire: VoIP & Triple-Play
ƒ Is VoIP service legal ?
¾ If No, are you planning to eventually legalize ?
ƒ Are you planning to introduce any sort of explicitely
branded VoIP services
ƒ What services did you provide through broadand
access ?
¾ Are you providing triple (or more) play services over
Broadband access ?
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
34
Q19 Questionnaire: NGN Migration (voice)
at Transit (Int’l and National)
ƒ Are you using or planning to use VoIP for Int’l calls?
¾ If yes, what percentage of incoming/outgoing Int’l traffic is
impacted ?
ƒ Are you deploying your own SoftSwitches/media gateways
or using those of an international VoIP provider?
ƒ Do you have a national IP backbone ?
ƒ Are you using or planning to use VoIP for national calls
(transit level)? What are the reasons of your choice?
¾
¾
¾
¾
Availability/Unavailability of an IP backbone?
Irrelevant/lower prices for national calls?
New/Obsolete legacy PSTN/ISDN equipment?
Other?
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
35
Q19 Questionnaire: NGN Migration (voice)
at Access and IMS evolution
ƒ Are you using Loop Emulation Service over a DSL
access?
ƒ Did you migrate to next generation Multi-Service
Access concentration equipment (MSAN) associated
with a Class 5 SoftSwitch ?
¾ If yes, is this because of the obsolescence of your legacy
equipment?
¾ What kind of last mile access (FTTH, FTTx, or copper) are
you using with your MSAN
ƒ What are your views on the maturity of IMS-like
architectures and your willingness to move to them?
¾ If yes, what drivers: new revenues, migration of new
customers, other?
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
36
Concluding Remarks (1)
ƒ Y.2261, Y.2262 and Y.2271 provides some functional
guidelines for NGN migration with a focus on
emulating existing PSTN/ISDN network
¾ Scenarios proposed well adapted to the context of legacy
operator willing to move their services as they exist to NGN
¾ But a bit less to new entrants: reality of NGN voice services by
new entrants leans towards simulation rather than emulation
ƒ Developing countries must contribute more effectively
to this standardization effort to take into account their
specific conditions
¾ Legacy PSTN/ISDN infrastructure generally more modern
than in developed countries but…
¾ Growth needs more acute: grow with Emulation, Simulation
or…leapfrog to IMS ?
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
37
Concluding Remarks (2)
ƒ The work of Q19-1/2 is well advanced in the first two terms of
its agenda
¾ Trends of Telecommunication networks
¾ Examination of NGN technologies
ƒ We have a lack of contributions for the third
¾ Methodologies and Planning
ƒ In order to properly finalize the fourth (migration solutions)
and establish the main outcome (guidelines for migration) we
need developing countries contributions at least through
answers to the questionnaire
ƒ This question illustrates the fact that developing countries
participation not only needed to bridge the standardization gap
but also to contribute to pertinent standardization adopted to
their needs
¾ The best experts of developed countries cannot help you if you do not
contribute to questions that primarily concerns you!
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
38
Thank you for your attention!
Questions ?
Souheil Marine
Digital Bridge Manager
Alcatel-Lucent
souheil.marine@alcatel-lucent.fr
http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/digitalbridge
ITU-D SG1 Workshop on NGN Tariff Policies, Geneva, 8 September 2008
NGN Architecture and Q19-1/2, Souheil Marine
39
Download