Pressure sensor Surface Micromachining Deposit sacrificial layer PSG By HF Si Poly by XeF2 Deposit/pattern structural layer 2.008-spring-2003 Pattern anchors Etch sacrificial layer 2.008-spring-2003 Residual stress gradients Surface micromachining Structure sacrificial Polysilicon Silicon dioxide SiNx PSG Silicon dioxide polysilicon SiNx polysilicon Aluminum photoresist More tensile on top etchant HF HF XeF2 XeF2 oxygen plasma More compressive on top Just right! 2.008-spring-2003 Clean Room Gowning with bunny suit Class 1, 10, 100 2.008-spring-2003 Class of clean rooms Class 1 means one speckle of 0.5 µ partical in one ft3. Class 10, 100, 1000 HEPA filter, AHU A salt grain on a chip 2.008-spring-2003 2.008-spring-2003 6 Air Filters Class of clean rooms HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filters High efficiency, low ∆p, good loading characteristics Glass fibers in a paper like medium 97% retainment of incident particles of 0.3 µm or larger 2.008-spring-2003 0.5 µ Temp RH $/ft2 particle tolerance tolerance Class 10,000 10,000 +/- 3oF +/- 5% $250-300 1,000 1,000 +/- 2oF +/- 5% $350-400 100 100 +/- 10 1 1oF +/- 5% $1200 10 +/- 0.5oF +/- 3% $3500 1 +/- 0.3oF +/- 2% $10,000 2.008-spring-2003 Toxicity Particles class 0.1µ 0.2µ 0.3µ 0.5µ 5.0µ 1 35 7.5 3 1 N/A 10 350 75 30 10 N/A 100 N/A 1000 N/A 750 N/A 300 100 N/A 1000 TLV (Threshold Limit Value) N/A 7 Upper limit material concentration that an average healthy person can be exposed without adverse effects, ppm or mg/m3 Notorious Poisons CO (100 ppm), CO2 (5000 ppm), HCN (110 ppm), H2S (10 ppm) SO2 (5 ppm), NH3 (50 ppm) Arsenic trioxide AS2O3 (0.1g fatal) Hg (0.1 ppm via skin contact) All material are toxic in sufficient quantity, 5g caffein is fatal. Federal Standard 209; Number of particles per cubic foot 2.008-spring-2003 MEMS Applications 2.008-spring-2003 Display Technologies Market Leader CRT Flat CRT LCD PDP CRT R-TV HT Poly LCD LCD R-TV DLP OLED 20 R.& D. FED Issues z z z 2.008-spring-2003 40 60 80 100 Screen Size 300 inch TMA LT Poly LCD HDTV for 60” ~ 80” Home Theater Digital Presentation for 100 ” ~ 300” Projector Key Factor : Brightness 2.008-spring-2003 7 Brightness of Projection Displays 1st Optical MEMS device TM & DLP PROJECTOR 1995 CRT lmlm CRT: ~300 : ~300 LCD lmlm LCD: ~600 : ~600 ? : :~2000 ~2000lmlm AMA lux = lumen / m2 2.008-spring-2003 DMD Optical Switching Principle DMD Cell Structure 2 DMD Mirror on/off ± 10o Texas Instruments’s Technical Journal: Vol. 15, No. 3, July-Sept. 1998. Texas Instruments’s Technical Journal: Vol. 15, No. 3, July-Sept. 1998. 2.008-spring-2003 2.008-spring-2003 Light Modulation of TMA TMA Thinfilm Micromirror Array Projection Lens Black Light Increase of tilting angle µm 50 No NoTilting Tilting Light Source Modulation Stop Max. Tilting Max. Tilting Source Stop White TMA Mirror 2.008-spring-2003 2.008-spring-2003 8 Pixel Architecture TMA vs DMD Post contact to actuator Mirror Actuation DMDTM (Texas Instrument) Electrostatic Tilting Angle -10o, 0o, +10o Mirror Via contact to MOS Top Electrode PZT Actuator Bottom Electrode Supporting Layer Common Electrode MOS Anchor Drain Pad Gate Line Gray Scale Control 0o ~ 3o (continuous) On/Off Complex Linear Simple • Fatigue • Sticking • High Cost Drawbacks Source Line 2.008-spring-2003 TMATM (Daewoo Electronics) Piezoelectric • Uniformity 2.008-spring-2003 Mirror Flatness (VGA) Micromirror Arrays • MLE = Module Light = εf × εr × εm = 0.81 × εm Efficiency MLE XGA 1024 X 768 786,432 pixels •εf = Fill Factor = 90% •εr = Reflectvity = 90% •εm= Mirror Flatness εm = 50% MLE = 43% Human Hair VGA 640 X 480 307,200 pixels εm = 83% MLE = 70% 50 µm 2.008-spring-2003 (97µm × 97µm TMA mirror) 2.008-spring-2003 Coupled Natures of Thin Film Processes Forward coupling Step coverage, confromality Backward coupling Temperature dependent microstructural degradation Over/under etch, etch stop control Side attack, Passivation breakage Optical Efficiency(%) Evolution of TMA Pixels 24 3rd 3rd 20 16 2nd 2nd 1st 1st 12 8 4 95 96 97 98 99 Year 2.008-spring-2003 2.008-spring-2003 9 MIT Bow-actuator Piezoelectric Amplifiers Design of nanopipette (2): In-line array of nanopipettes Nick Conway, MS 2003 End effector Released Bottom PZT Top Massive Parallel Nanopipette Array by Inplane Scanning Probe Systems Integration with Microfluidic channels Integration of nanopipettes in AFM in an 100 x 100 array 4-bar linkage design Fixed substrate Single nanopipette 2.008-spring-2003 2.008-spring-2003 Photonic band gap microcavity waveguide processing Photonic crystal modeling Microcavity waveguide finite-difference time-domain 1 mesh SiO2 Si max Ex,r a Nanofabrication: SiNx mask1 /w electron-beam Proximity pattern transfer to resist 130 nm minimum features 100 µm 0 w input pulse design matrix of various geometries: defect lengths, waveguide width, d/a, number of holes ad Q = 180 Hard mask from Cr lift-off 2 Optimized Si RIE PMMA on Si a d min Cr lift-off mask J. Ferrera, NanoStructures Laboratory, MIT. 2.008-spring-2003 1 2.008-spring-2003 200 nm 300 nm 2 J. Foresi, Kimerling group, MIT. Design Domains Design is a mapping process From “What” to “How” Small scale systems design What 2.008-spring-2002 How N. P. Suh, Axiomatic Design, Oxford 10