Carolyn Gideon Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy Tufts University

advertisement
Carolyn Gideon
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy
Tufts University
The Ethics of Cyberactivism Workshop
University of Warwick
21 February 2014




Economics: Market Failure
Social Benefit Cost Analysis
Political Participation
Free Speech
J.M. Bauer, M.J.G. van Eeten /
Telecommunications Policy 33 (2009) 706–
719
Cost of
Cyberactivism
Supply (private
cost)
.
Market Equilibrium
Demand (private value)
QMarket
Quantity of
Cyberactivism
Spillovers:
Cost of
Cyberactivism
Cost to 3 rd Parties
Total Social Cost
Supply (private
cost)
.
Market Equilibrium
Demand (private value)
QOptimalQMarket
Quantity of
Cyberactivism
Spillovers:
Cost of
Cyberactivism
Market Equilibrium
Benefit to 3 rd Parties
.
Supply (private
cost)
Social Value
Demand (private value)
QMarket QOptimal
Quantity of
Cyberactivism

Benefits to all member of
society over time
◦ Expected issue awareness
◦ Expected benefit of
political participation
◦ Expected benefit free
speech
◦ Expected benefit of
advancement of
cause/issue
◦ Knowledge of network
vulnerability
◦ Etc.
Total Benefits
>
<
?

Costs to all members
of society over time
◦ Direct cost of ‘hacking’
activity
◦ Cost to website owner
◦ Cost to others who
cannot use the website
◦ Additional security costs
◦ Reduced trust in network
reliability
◦ Etc.
Total Costs



Who is defining benefits and costs?
How are they quantified?
Is there a true social optimal amount of
cyberactivism? And could we identify it?

Political Contest Model (Gadi Wolfsfeld 1997)
◦ Political conflict includes competition over media
◦ Competition for access to media (structural)
◦ Competition for frame of media message (meaning)

Cyber version
◦ Exceptional behavior?
◦ Creating access?
◦ Revision of relative power?

[Can Manufactured Consent survive the
Internet?]



Meaning of the mask
Civil disobedience and consequences
Dilemma of distributed forum
◦ Directed content consumption
◦ Where is the debate?

Shift costs and benefits to actors
◦ Legal
◦ Technical


Maximize benefits s.t. constraint on harm
Minimize harm s.t. constraint on speech
limitation
Download