Risk ESD.864 Noelle Selin April 2 and 9, 2013 1 What is risk? Risk = hazard x probability Degree of harm x likelihood of harm Must use models/technical analyses to constrain both “degree” and “likelihood” Risk assessment frameworks: assessment/decision-making processes on risks 2 Risk as an assessment framework Risk vs. Risk 2[IRUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG7KLVFRQWHQWLVH[FOXGHGIURPRXU&UHDWLYH &RPPRQVOLFHQVH)RUPRUHLQIRUPDWLRQVHHKWWSRFZPLWHGXKHOSIDTIDLUXVH 6RXUFH6ORYLF3DXO%H\RQG1XPEHUV$%URDGHU3HUVSHFWLYHRQ5LVN3HUFHSWLRQDQG5LVN &RPPXQLFDWLRQ$FFHSWDEOH(YLGHQFH6FLHQFHDQG9DOXHVLQ5LVN0DQDJHPHQW From Slovic, “Beyond Numbers” 3 © Westview Press. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/. Source: Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff, et al. "Characterizing Perceived Risk." R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, & J. X. Kasperson (eds.), Perilous progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology, pp. 91-125, Westview, 1985. 4 Slovic et al 1985 2[IRUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG7KLVFRQWHQWLVH[FOXGHGIURPRXU&UHDWLYH &RPPRQVOLFHQVH)RUPRUHLQIRUPDWLRQVHHKWWSRFZPLWHGXKHOSIDTIDLUXVH 6RXUFH6ORYLF3DXO%H\RQG1XPEHUV$%URDGHU3HUVSHFWLYHRQ5LVN3HUFHSWLRQDQG5LVN &RPPXQLFDWLRQ$FFHSWDEOH(YLGHQFH6FLHQFHDQG9DOXHVLQ5LVN0DQDJHPHQW 5 Risk as a decision tool Zero risk (no animal carcinogens in food) De minimis risk (<10-6 lifetime risk of cancer) Safety (no observable effect level) Acceptable risk (regulatory policy standard) Risk tradeoffs risks vs. benefits (economic, social) risks vs. risks (flying vs. driving) 6 Traditional Risk Analysis: Steps Research Hazard identification Exposure assessment Risk characterization Risk communication Risk management 7 National Research Council, “Red Book” Model of Risk Analysis (1983) Research Risk Management Risk Assessment Laboratory and field observations Information on extrapolation methods Development of regulatory option Toxicity assessment : Hazard identification and close-response assessment Evaluation of public health, economic, social, political consequences of regulatory options Research needs identified from risk assessment process Field measurements, characterization of populations Risk characterization Exposure assessment emissions characterization Agency decisions and actions Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. 8 Issues raised by traditional risk-based approaches Framing of the problem Uncertainty…and ignorance? Different sorts of expertise; lay public input Separation of risk assessment, risk management functions Conservative bias? Risk vs. risk considerations? 9 Build-your-own risk assessment model Imagine an assessment process for a new and potentially hazardous chemical (let’s say it’s a pesticide). With reference to the NRC 1983 risk diagram, construct your own risk-assessment model which would address some of the criticisms of that model. You might think about: How something is selected for risk analysis Feedbacks from the process? Role of the public in defining risks, risk communication, etc. Conceptual separation between risk assessment/risk management Any changes to steps? 10 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu ESD.864 / 12.844J Modeling and Assessment for Policy Spring 2013 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.