Instructor: Laurel Sprague
Office hours: W 3:30-‐5:00
Office location: 601E Pray-‐Harrold
Email: lspragu2@emich.edu
Winter 2015
Class hours: M/ W 2:00-‐3:15
Class location: Marshall 108
Department phone: 734.487.6970
This class focuses on contemporary issues in political theory. Building from the foundation provided for us by 20 th century political thinkers, John Rawls, Michel Foucault, and Jürgen Habermas, this class will examine power, justice, democracy, and self-‐determination from multiple angles and perspectives.
Following the lead of Pierre Bourdieu, we will begin with – and continually circle back to – where we, ourselves, find ourselves placed and place ourselves within these questions. For the main part of our semester together, we will focus on issues of democracy and difference, analysing the ways in which many of the most thought-‐provoking political philosophers of our time have responded to contemporary questions of identity, culture, hegemony, fairness, historical injustice, (in)equality, representation, and legitimacy within political systems. These contemporary philosophers come from various backgrounds, including feminist, socialist, liberal, republican, cosmopolitan, multiculturalist, post-‐colonial, and traditionalist political theory. In the last weeks of class, we will use a series of debates between four contemporary political philosophers and public intellectuals (some more public than others) – Judith Butler, Jürgen Habermas, Charles Tayler, and Cornel West – to engage with the particularly pressing political issue of the role of religion in the public sphere. Students are expected, throughout the class, to measure their experiences and thoughts against the theories studied and to question, analyse, debate, agree, change your minds, and generally immerse yourselves in the big political questions of autonomy and community, freedom and fairness, self-‐governance and obligation of our time.
Required Texts
Seyla Benhabib, editor. 1996. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691044781.
Judith Butler, Jurgen Habermas, Charles Taylor, and Cornel West. 2011. The Power of Religion in the
Public Sphere. Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan Vanantwerpen, editors. New York: Columbia University
Press. ISBN: 9780231156462.
Optional Text
Michel Foucault. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Alan Sheridan, translator. New
York: Vintage Books.
Additional texts will be assigned and made available via email/web.
Course Requirements
Students are expected to read the texts closely before each class period and come prepared to ask questions and discuss each author’s propositions about such philosophical concepts as power, justice, democracy, autonomy, community, and difference.
Your grade in the class will be based on the following:
Participation 10%
Students are expected to come to class having completed the readings and prepared to engage in discussions. Your participation grade will be based less on the quantity of your contributions than on your ability to ask meaningful questions and listen and respond respectfully to your fellow students and your willingness to try on new ideas and critically evaluate multiple viewpoints.
You can miss up to three classes without penalty to your participation grade; however more than three absences will result in a reduction.
I may use a “Fish Bowl” format (described in the first class) for participation to allow students greater opportunity for engagement and feedback from me.
Response papers 20%
Most class periods will start with a question for discussion that highlights a fundamental concern from the reading for that day. Two times during the semester, to be determined by you, you must write and turn in a 3-‐4 page response to a discussion question. This response paper must demonstrate an understanding of, an analysis of, and a response to the ways in which the author under discussion for that class period would respond to the question. The response paper is due one week after the assigned reading upon which it is based.
Quizzes 20%
A few times during the semester, I will administer short quizzes with a maximum of 10 short answer questions. These are designed to make sure you are able to identify the philosophers we study with the main components of their theories. Quizzes will be cumulative across the semester.
Final Paper 30%
Your final grade in the class will be based on a paper of approximately 10 pages in which you will examine a contemporary political issue using the political thought of one (or possibly two) of the theorists discussed during the semester. Further instructions will be provided. Due by 12 pm on April 27.
Presentation 20%
Because a crucial element of contemporary political thought is engagement and dialogue with ideas and fellow thinkers, each student will provide a short (5-‐7 minute) presentation of the basic questions and ideas that form your final paper. Time for presentations will be provided during the final weeks of class.
Grading Scale
The grading scale for the class is as follows:
A 93-‐100 percent A-‐ 90-‐92.9 percent B+ 87-‐89.9 percent B 83-‐86.9 percent
B-‐ 80-‐82.9 percent C+ 77-‐79.9 percent C 73-‐76.9 percent
D+ 67-‐69.9 percent D 63-‐66.9 percent D-‐ 60-‐62.9 percent
C-‐ 70-‐72.9 percent
F <59.9 percent
Communicating with the Instructor
It will be easiest to contact me via email. If you need to speak with me during my office hours, call the political science department office at 734 487 3113 and ask to be connected with me.
You are urged to use your EMU email address. I will use the EMU email addresses if I need to communicate information to the class, for example, if there is an unexpected class cancellation. If you choose to communicate with me using another email address, identify yourself clearly in the subject line. You should know that I delete messages when I do not know the sender to protect my system from email viruses.
Discussion Guidelines
Listen closely to one another. This includes trying to verify that you understand what the other person is saying, particularly when you disagree.
Speak respectfully, in agreement and disagreement. Do not interrupt each other.
Allow each other to change. No one is bound to any one statement. Anyone can change her or his mind.
Understand that no student in this class can be asked to speak for her or his racial, ethnic, religious, or any other, group. No group is homogenous. Each of us speaks as a unique individual with our own opinions and experiences.
General Guidelines for Behavior in College Classrooms
§ Turn off your cell phone and computer before class starts.
§ If you need to leave early, let me know ahead of time.
§ Arrive a few minutes before class so that class can start on time without interruptions.
§ Do not engage in side conversations during lectures and discussions.
§ Do not read newspapers, magazines, web pages, or any other materials not related to class during class time.
§ Arrive ready to discuss the day’s topic and readings.
§ Use class email addresses and instructors’ email addresses only for class-‐related questions and information.
§ If you are absent, it is your responsibility to get the information from the class you missed from another student. Make friends.
Accessibility
If you have a disability and are registered with the Student s with Disabilities office, please see me during the first week of class. We will set up a meeting to determine how we can best work together to ensure that you are able to fully and fairly participate in all aspects of the class. Please bring your paperwork from EAS to our meeting.
To contact the Students with Disabilities Office, go to http://www.emich.edu/drc/index.html.
Academic Honesty
Students are expected to know and abide by all University rules on academic honesty and deportment.
If you are uncertain of your responsibilities as a student, consult the Student Conduct Code. The full text is available at http://www.emich.edu/policies/chapter8/8-‐1_policy.pdf. Any violation of provisions on academic honesty will be prosecuted to the full extent allowable.
Here are some examples of the kinds of actions that constitute academic dishonesty:
§ Plagiarizing—willfully presenting the language, ideas, or thoughts of another person as one’s original work;
§ Revealing the form or content of an examination or quiz; attempting to secure a copy of or information about a future examination or quiz without authorization from the instructor;
§ Copying another’s answers in an in-‐class or take-‐home examination, paper, laboratory work, or class assignment; using crib notes, prepared blue books, or other types of unauthorized materials;
§ Discussing answers during an in-‐class examination or a take-‐home examination without the instructor’s permission;
§ Submitting work completed for a previous course for a subsequent course without the permission of the instructor; submitting the same paper in two or more concurrent courses without the informed consent of the instructors;
§ Stealing, damaging, or concealing materials or equipment necessary to the academic well-‐being of the college community, such as library books, computer files, and audiovisual equipment.” 1
Registration Information and Dates
Incomplete grades are not a matter of right. An "I" grade will be granted only in the most highly unusual circumstances. University policy requires all incompletes to be completed within one year.
University policy requires the instructor's signature for dropping a class after the drop/add period. In addition, instructors are required to note whether the student is failing at the time the class is dropped.
1
These examples are taken from Washington College’s Honor code: http://catalog.washcoll.edu/17_honor.html
I reserve the right to exercise the discretion given to me under University policy and not approve a drop request.
If you need to drop this class, you must do so by the official drop date. If you fail to drop this class officially by the last official drop date and you are failing to class, you will be given a grade of F for the course.
NOTE: The University (as per federal guidelines) requires all instructors to indicate whether any students who received an F grade stopped attending classes. If you stop attending the class and receive an F, your financial aid may be at risk.
The University Writing Center
The University Writing Center (115 Halle Library; 487-‐0694) offers one-‐to-‐one writing consulting for both undergraduate and graduate students. Students can make appointments or drop in between the hours of 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. Mondays through Thursdays and from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Fridays. Students should bring a draft of what they’re working on and their assignment sheet.
The UWC also offers small group workshops on various topics related to writing (e.g., Organizing Your
Writing; Incorporating Evidence; Revising Your Writing; Conquering Commas; Using APA or MLA).
Workshops are offered at different times in the UWC. Visit the UWC page (http://www.emich.edu/uwc ) to see our workshop calendar. To register for a workshop, click the link from the UWC page for the type of workshop you wish to attend.
The UWC also has several satellite sites across campus. These satellites provide writing support to students within the various colleges. For more information about our satellite locations and hours, visit the UWC web site: http://www.emich.edu/uwc.
The Academic Projects Center (116 Halle Library) also offers one-‐to-‐one writing consulting for students, in addition to consulting on research and technology-‐related issues. The APC is open 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Mondays through Thursdays for drop-‐in consultations. Additional information about the APC can be found at http://www.emich.edu/apc . Students visiting the Academic Projects Center or any of the satellites of the University Writing Center should also bring with them a draft of what they’re working on and their assignment sheet.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right to make changes to the syllabus, examination, and/or grading policy if required during the course of the semester.
READING SCHEDULE
Week 1 (Jan 5 and 7)
Week 2 (Jan 12 and 14)
Week 3 (Jan 21)
Week 4 (Jan 26 and 28)
Week 5 (Feb 2 and 4)
Week 6 (Feb 9 and 11)
Week 7 (Feb 16 and 18)
Week 8 (Mar 2 and 4)
Week 9 (Mar 9 and 11)
Week 10 (Mar 16 and 18)
Week 11 (Mar 23 and 25)
Week 12 (Mar 30 and Apr 1)
Week 13 (Apr 6 and 8)
Weeks 14 and 15 (Apr 13, 15, 20)
Reflexivity
Pierre Bourdieu (2003) Participant Objectivation. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-‐9655.00150/full
A Theory of Justice
John Rawls (1957) Justice as Fairness. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-‐
362X%2819571024%2954%3A22%3C653%3AIJAF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-‐6
On Power … and the Body
Michel Foucault (1975, 1995). Discipline and Punish. (All provided)
Part 1, Chapter 2: The Spectacle of the Scaffold, pp. 32-‐69
On Power … and the Body, cont.
Part 3, Chapter 2: The Means of Correct Training, pp. 170-‐194
Part 3, Chapter 3: Panopticism, pp. 195-‐228
Part 4, Chapter 2: Illegalities and Delinquency, pp. 257-‐292
Democratic Theory (Democracy and Difference (D&D), Part 1)
Chapter 1: Jürgen Habermas
Chapter 2: Sheldon Wolin
Democratic Theory, cont.
Chapter 3: Jane Mansbridge
Chapter 4: Seyla Benhabib
Democratic Theory, cont.
Chapter 6: Iris Marion Young
Equality, Difference, and Public Representation (D&D, Part 2)
Chapter 7: Anne Phillips
Chapter 8: Will Kymlicka
Chapter 10: Jean Cohen
Culture, Identity, and Democracy (D&D, Part 3)
Chapter 12: Chantel Mouffe
Chapter 13: Bonnie Honig
Culture, Identity, and Democracy, cont.
Chapter 14: Fred Dallmayr
Chapter 16: Carlos Forment
Ta-‐Nihisi Coates (2014). The Case for Reparations. http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/05/the-‐case-‐for-‐ reparations/361631/
Does Democracy Need Foundations? (D&D, Part 4)
Chapters 17 and 18: Richard Rorty and Robert Dahl
Chapters 19 and 20: Amy Guttman and Benjamin Barber
The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere
Introduction, Jurgen Habermas, Charles Taylor, and Dialogue between
Habermas and Taylor (pp. 1-‐69)
The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, cont.
Judith Butler, Cornel West, Dialogue between Butler and West, and
Concluding Discussion (pp. 70-‐117)
Presentations