Eastern Michigan University College of Technology Ph.D. in Technology Course Syllabus Course Number, Title, and Credit Hours: COT 705- Technology Design, Development and Transfer - 3 credits Semester and Year: Winter 2007 Prerequisites: COT 700 (previously COT 600) Instructor: Dr. Dan Fields Office hours: by appointment, call direct. Phone: (734) 487-2040 e-mail: dan.fields@emich.edu Text: Ulrich & Eppinger, Product Design and Development (3d Edition), McGraw-Hill, NY, NY, 2004. Catalog Description: This course examines the processes involved in designing and bringing new products to market, and the engineering, cultural, political and business factors that influence those processes. Special attention is paid to the concepts of humancentered and gendered design, the structure and functioning of product development teams, and the philosophy of concurrent engineering. Also covered in this course is the role that governments and agencies play in supporting technology transfer from research laboratory to marketplace, and from country to country. Expectations: This is one of three core courses in the Ph.D. in Technology Program. It is a practiceoriented course, aimed at developing and applying the interdisciplinary skills required for successful product development in today’s competitive marketplace. Participants with varied backgrounds will function in product development teams to walk through the new product development process, learning the tools and techniques to execute each process step along the way. The outcome will be the development of a marketable product, with prototype. Objectives: Upon completion of the course, participants will be able to: 1. Demonstrate competence with a set of tools and methods for product design and development. 2. Demonstrate their abilities to create a new product. 3. Describe and apply the role of multiple functions in creating a new product (i.e. marketing, finance, industrial design, engineering, and production). 4. Function as a team member to coordinate multiple interdisciplinary tasks in order to achieve a common objective. 5. Apply specific knowledge from other courses and experience through practice in an action-oriented setting. Grading: 95 – 100% = A 90 – 94% = A87-89% = B+ 83-86% = B 80 – 82% = B- 77-79% = C+ 73- 75% = C 70 – 72% = C<70% = E Weights of grading components: 25% quality of preparation for and participation in class discussions and exercises 10% quality of individual assignments 35% quality of team’s work on project-related assignments 30% quality of team’s final project presentation Schedule: (subject to change) Week Date Topic 1 1/11 Introduction 2 1/18 3 1/25 4 5 6 7 2/1 2/8 2/15 2/22 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3/8 3/15 3/22 3/29 4/5 4/12 4/19 4/26 Development Process, Organizations, and Product Planning Identifying Customer Needs Product Specifications Concept Generation Concept Selection Concept Testing Product Architecture Industrial Design Design for Manufacturing Prototyping Robust Design Patents & Intellectual Property Product Development Economics Managing Projects Project Presentation Preparation Project Presentations Reading (Chapt.) 1,2,3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Class Preparation and Participation: Reading assignments are given in the schedule. You are expected to come to class prepared to discuss the readings and suggested exercises and questions. Further, it is expected that you will have applied the concepts toward the product development project prior to each class. This permits constant feedback and corrections of course based on lessons learned. Individual class participation grades will be based on evidence of preparation and practice, and in-class remarks during discussions. Individual Assignments: Exercises at the end of the chapters will periodically be turned in. Others are simply intended to prepare you for class discussion. Projects: The challenge in the project portion of this course is to design a new product and to produce a prototype version of it. The goal of this exercise is to learn principles and methods of product development in a realistic context. Most product development professionals work under tremendous time pressure and do not have time to reflect on the development process. The project activity will be integrated into in-class discussions and activities…read about it, do some exercises, apply to the project, review results and problems encountered, evaluate, make adjustments and move on to the next step. There will typically be insights provided at later stages in the development process that will make us want to return to earlier stages. Project ideas will come from class participants or some from inventors or companies outside of EMU. Project teams will select which project they wish to pursue. Guidelines for reasonable projects are provided below. Project team membership will be determined in the second week of the semester. Guidelines for Project Selection: You are strongly encouraged to choose a project satisfying all of the following constraints: 1. There should be a demonstrable market for the product. One good way to verify a market need is to identify existing products that attempt to meet the need. Your product need not be a variant of an existing product, but the market need addressed by your product should be clearly evident. The product does not need to have a tremendous economic potential, but should at lease be an attractive opportunity for an established firm with related products and/or skills. 2. Products should be material goods, not services. While many of the concepts in the course apply to service and software products, many do not (i.e. design for manufacturing). 3. The product should have a high likelihood of containing fewer than ten parts. Although it is not possible to anticipate design details early on, it is easy to anticipate the number of parts from a similar existing product. 4. You should be confident of being able to prototype the product with minimum costs, using EMU labs and equipment, and within the time constraints of the semester. 5. The product should require no basic technological breakthroughs. You don’t have the time to deal with technological uncertainties. 6. You should have access to more than five potential lead users of the product (more than 20 would be nice). For example, consumer products rather than specialized processing products used by a few manufacturers. 7. Don’t select highly proprietary ideas. We will openly discuss the projects in class. 8. Successful project tend to have at least one team member with an interest in the target market. Some Examples from Previous MIT Graduate Classes (Prof. Steven Eppinger, Product Design & Development): Clipboard for disabled persons Beverage holder for sail boats Rowing foot stretcher for crew shells Beer bottle capper for home brewers Grocery bag carrier for urban shoppers Brake for in-line skates Canteen for in-line skaters Book bag for college students Portable sharpener for ice skates Laser level for carpenters Reading/area light for campers Clamp for theatrical lighting Tripod for birders POLICIES: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Attendance and punctuality are expected. Success in this course is highly dependent on your active participation in all aspects of the course. Beginning with the second class meeting, you should have the required text at each lecture. You are responsible for reading assignments, lectures, demonstration information, and problem sheets dispensed during the course. No extra credit papers or projects will be accepted. Your final grade will depend solely on grading criteria identified above. I will not give time extensions for assignments unless agreed upon by the entire class and me. I will give "I" (s) ONLY in accordance with Eastern Michigan University's guidelines. If anyone requires accommodations due to a disability that may affect your performance in the course, please discuss this with me. You may also contact the EMU Office of Students with Disabilities for assistance: If you are experiencing difficulty with any of the course content please seek a private consultation with me to discuss remediation of deficiencies. I welcome and encourage your feedback concerning course requirements, assignments, tests, or course content. Academic Honesty In any University-level course, a statement of policy regarding academic honesty should be entirely unnecessary. However, it should be noted that the policy of the School of Engineering Technology is that any student who engages in any activity constituting academic dishonesty will receive an "E" for the course in which the activity occurred. This policy relates to all forms of work associated with the course requirements; including examinations, quizzes, and all assignments. It is your responsibility to review the college catalog in order to determine those activities that constitute academic dishonesty at Eastern Michigan University, which includes both cheating and plagiarism.