October 29, 2013
Practice Groups:
Oil and Gas
Energy
PUC Issues Proposed Rulemaking Order
Introducing New Resolution Procedures for Impact
Fee Disputes
By Daniel P. Delaney
Introduction
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) issued a proposed rulemaking order on
October 17, 2013 implementing the unconventional gas well fee (“Impact Fee”) provisions of
Act 13. In large measure, the proposed regulations codify the procedures adopted in the
PUC’s prior implementation orders concerning the Impact Fee authorized by Chapter 23 of
Act 13. The PUC, however, does change direction from its prior orders and includes in the
proposed regulations procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning the application of
Impact Fees to specific wells and the refund of overpayments. Both procedures, however,
require prompt action by the producer to preserve its rights.
The proposed rulemaking order and regulations will be published for comment in the
Pennsylvania Bulletin. Written comments concerning the proposed regulations must be
provided to the PUC within 30 days of publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
Background
The PUC has entered four orders addressing the initial implementation of Chapter 23 of Act
13. 1 In an order entered December 20, 2012, the PUC provided a general discussion of Act
13 provisions in response to a producer’s petition for clarification concerning disputes and
refunds. The order, however, did not identify specific dispute resolution procedures.2
Disputes on Individual Wells
The proposed regulations vary from the PUC’s prior order in that they provide procedures for
a producer to dispute that an unconventional gas well is subject to the Impact Fee, and/or to
request the refund of an overpaid gas well Impact Fee. Act 13 requires all producers to file
annual producer reports with the PUC on April 1 identifying the number of its spud
unconventional gas wells subject to the Impact Fee for the previous calendar year. The
producer is required to submit payment of the Impact Fees with the report. Section 131.6(b)
of the proposed regulations identifies a procedure to resolve disputes concerning whether a
well is subject to the Impact Fee. The producer must first identify the dispute regarding
payment of the Impact Fee on the annual producer report. A producer is not required to
submit payment of the Impact Fee for a disputed well until the dispute has been resolved.
1
The PUC’s implementation orders are published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin at the following citations: 42 Pa. Bull. 1744
(Tentative Implementation Order); 42 Pa. Bull. 3038 (Implementation Order); 42 Pa. Bull. 4996 (Reconsideration Order);
and 43 Pa. Bull. 115 (Clarification Order).
2
See Clarification Order Regarding Chapter 23, published at 43 Pa. Bull. 115.
PUC Issues Proposed Rulemaking Order Introducing New Resolution
Procedures for Impact Fee Disputes
The PUC’s Fiscal Office will initiate an enforcement proceeding against a producer for
untimely or delinquent Impact Fee payments by issuing a “Notice of Amount Due” (“Notice”).
The producer must file with the PUC a written response to the Notice within 20 days of the
date of service. If the producer fails to pay the amount demanded in the Notice and does not
file a written response with the PUC, the producer is deemed to be in default. If the producer
files a timely written response, the matter will be referred to the PUC’s Office of
Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) for hearing and the issuance of a recommended decision.
The PUC will review the ALJ’s decision and issue a final order regarding the matter.
The PUC may assess interest and penalties against a producer for untimely or delinquent
Impact Fee payments if (1) the producer fails to pay the amount identified in the Notice, (2)
the producer fails to file a timely written response to the Notice, or (3) after hearing before
the PUC ALJ, the PUC sustains the amount due by a final order.
Refunds or Adjustments of Overpaid Impact Fees
Sections 131.6(d), (e) and (f) of the proposed regulations identify a procedure by which a
producer can request a refund or adjustment of an overpaid Impact Fee. These procedures
for refunds or adjustments of Impact Fees were not previously contained in the PUC’s
implementation orders and provide remedies to resolve errors in the calculation of the Impact
Fee.
Refunds or adjustments of Impact Fees will not be issued unless there is a classification or
computation error in the calculation of the fee. A petition for refund must be filed with the
PUC Secretary by May 1 following the April 1 Impact Fee payment date. Upon expiration of
the 30-day refund period, the PUC will not issue to the producer a refund or adjustment of
overpaid Impact Fees. The petition for refund must be in writing and identify the name and
address of the producer filing the petition, the unconventional gas well permit number, and a
detailed explanation of the classification or computation error causing the overpayment.
Conclusion
The procedures contained in Section 131.6 of the proposed regulations should simplify the
process to resolve disputes concerning the application of the Impact Fee to specific
unconventional wells and the refund or adjustment of overpaid Impact Fees. If the section is
finally adopted as proposed, the producer must act quickly to preserve its rights. K&L Gates
has over 25 years of experience in successfully representing clients before the PUC,
including the successful resolution of a recent dispute over the classification of a well and the
overpayment of an Impact Fee, and can provide assistance in these areas.
Author:
Daniel P. Delaney
dan.delaney@klgates.com
+1.717.231.4516
2
PUC Issues Proposed Rulemaking Order Introducing New Resolution
Procedures for Impact Fee Disputes
Anchorage Austin Beijing Berlin Boston Brisbane Brussels Charleston Charlotte Chicago Dallas Doha Dubai Fort Worth Frankfurt
Harrisburg Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Melbourne Miami Milan Moscow Newark New York Orange County Palo Alto Paris
Perth Pittsburgh Portland Raleigh Research Triangle Park San Diego San Francisco São Paulo Seattle Seoul Shanghai Singapore Spokane
Sydney Taipei Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. Wilmington
K&L Gates practices out of 48 fully integrated offices located in the United States, Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East and South
America and represents leading global corporations, growth and middle-market companies, capital markets participants and
entrepreneurs in every major industry group as well as public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations and
individuals. For more information about K&L Gates or its locations, practices and registrations, visit www.klgates.com.
This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in
regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer.
©2013 K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.
3