PROJECT TITLE :
PROJECT LEADER :
Evaluation of spring wheat variety performance in trials near Moccasin,
Denton, Fort Benton, and Winifred.
D. M. Wichman, Agronomist, Moccasin, MT
PROJECT PERSONNEL : L. E. Talbert, Spring Wheat Breeder, Bozeman, MT
S. P. Lanning, Spring Wheat Research Assoc., Bozeman, MT
G. L. Sharp, Research Associate, Moccasin, MT
J. Vavrovsky, Research Specialist, Moccasin, MT
Dave Philips, Fergus County Extension Agent, Lewistown, MT
Judee Wargo, Chouteau County Ext. Agent, Fort Benton, MT
OBJECTIVES :
To evaluate the performance of spring wheat varieties in environments and cropping methods representative of the southern triangle and central Montana.
RESULTS :
Yield – Yields ranged from 6.1 to 36.5 bu/a with the highest yields at the Moccasin sites (Table 28). Low moisture at the Fort Benton site contributed to lower than average yields. Reeder was one of the top yielding varieties averaging 28.6 bu/a across the five locations, however differences in yield among the varieties were significant only in the Winifred and Moccasin recrop nurseries. Multiple year summaries for the locations are reported in Tables 30-33.
Heading Date – Heading dates are reported for the Moccasin nursery on fallow only (Table 28). All varieties headed within 3 days of one another and differences between the varieties were not statistically significant.
Plant Height – Plant heights averaged just over 24 inches at all locations except for the Fort Benton site
(Table 28). Dry conditions contributed to plants ranging in height from 15 to 19 inches.
Test Weight – Test weights for spring wheat averaged 60 lbs/bu on Moccasin fallow and on Denton recrop (Table 29). Test weights for other locations averaged less than 60 lbs/bu.
Protein – Proteins averaged 17 percent at three locations, 15.7 percent at Denton, and 12.4 percent on
Moccasin fallow. Uneven distribution of the fall application of nitrogen resulted in the low protein levels for the Moccasin fallow nursery.
SUMMARY :
Low precipitation levels resulted in lower than average yields at all locations tested. This was most evident at the Fort Benton site where yields were approximately one third that of the long term averages.
Yields at the Winifred site were also significantly less than long term averages for that area. Equations predicting spring wheat yields based on past variety performance are presented in Table 34.
FUTURE PLANS :
Spring wheat variety evaluations will continue at Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, and Winifred.
C36
Table 28.
Exp. 9900
2001 Spring wheat heading date, yield, and plant height.
Central Agricultural Research Center, Moccasin, MT
Mocc Mocc Mocc Denton Ft Benton Winifred
Heading Fallow Recrop Recrop Recrop Fallow
Mocc Mocc Denton Ft Benton Winifred
Average Fallow Recrop Recrop Recrop Fallow Average
Pedigree Date
days
Reeder
Scholar
178
177
9907 9970 9971 bu/a
34.4
33.0
bu/a
35.8
35.1
bu/a
32.1
31.0
9972 bu/a
10.4
11.5
9973 bu/a
30.3
29.1
Yield bu/a
9907 in
9970 in
9971 in
28.6
24.0
27.7
26.0
27.9
26.0
32.3
28.0
9972 in
17.7
16.3
9973 Height in
24.0
24.0
in
23.9
25.3
MT 9874
Amidon
Conan
Express
Newana
MTHW9710
McNeal
MTHW9904
MTHW9420
Lew
178
176
179
176
178
178
178
177
178
177
35.2
33.1
34.5
31.3
33.1
33.1
32.1
34.4
34.8
32.5
32.0
32.3
33.9
34.0
32.0
34.6
32.7
30.7
31.1
29.8
29.4
29.5
28.3
27.4
26.1
28.9
28.7
28.5
27.9
26.5
10.9
12.0
9.4
7.7
10.8
7.1
10.2
9.5
8.3
11.0
28.2
28.3
28.7
29.3
27.2
25.1
23.8
23.8
24.7
26.8
27.1
25.0
28.7
29.0
27.1
26.7
33.7
29.0
26.9
26.3
27.0
26.0
25.9
25.8
25.8
23.7
25.3
26.7
25.7
27.0
26.0
20.0
21.0
24.0
25.5
30.0
28.0
24.0
25.4
26.3
30.7
29.0
25.4
25.3
29.7
27.3
26.7
32.7
24.0
28.0
18.7
18.0
17.3
16.7
18.3
15.0
17.3
15.3
15.0
16.0
25.0
21.7
25.3
24.3
22.7
24.3
26.0
24.0
25.7
24.0
25.3
25.8
24.4
22.1
22.9
23.2
25.1
25.1
24.2
25.6
Westbred 936
Fortuna
Ernest
MT 9929
Rambo
Westbred 926
Hi-Line
Grandin
178
177
179
178
178
177
178
178
33.7
36.5
35.1
33.1
32.0
33.5
30.3
31.0
27.7
29.3
26.9
28.6
28.3
31.5
29.0
31.3
30.8
26.1
27.7
30.2
27.1
27.6
26.9
28.2
7.3
10.2
11.4
8.2
10.5
6.1
10.2
8.5
26.4
23.5
24.0
24.0
24.7
23.8
26.1
22.1
25.2
27.0
24.7
20.0
25.1
24.3
32.7
26.0
25.0
28.3
31.0
29.0
24.8
24.0
25.7
22.0
24.5
27.7
25.3
23.0
24.5
24.0
27.0
24.0
24.5
30.0
28.0
22.0
24.2
28.0
28.0
27.0
17.3
16.3
18.7
17.7
17.3
15.3
16.3
17.7
23.3
25.0
25.0
23.0
23.7
23.3
24.0
25.0
22.5
24.9
26.4
22.5
23.4
22.7
24.1
25.1
Average 177.5
CV (s/mean)*100 1.0
LSD (0.05)
Planting Date: ns
Harvest Date:
Fertilizer (lbs N/a):
Growing Season Precip:
Producer/Cooperator:
33.3
7.9
31.3
8.9
28.4
10.5
9.6
25.5
ns 4.6
ns ns
4/19/01 4/18/01 5/9/01 4/23/01
26.0
10.1
4.3
4/24/01
8/15/01 8/15/01 8/24/01
10
7.29
77
7.29
70
5.75
8/16/01
90
4.65
8/17/01
70
5.0
Barber Birkeland Udelhoven
25.7
26.5
28.4
25.1
9.4
4.2
4.1
2.0
16.9
10.5
ns
24.2
8.0
ns
24.2
Table 29.
2001 Spring wheat test weight and protein performance in Central Montana.
Exp. 9900 Central Agricultural Research Center, Moccasin, MT
----------- Test Weight ----------
Mocc Mocc Denton Ft Benton Winifred
---------- Protein ----------
Mocc Mocc Denton Ft Benton Winifred
Fallow Recrop Recrop Recrop Fallow
ID Pedigree 9907 9970 9971 9972 9973
Fallow Recrop Recrop Recrop
Average 9907 9970 9971 9972
Fallow
9973 Average lbs/bu lbs/bu lbs/bu lbs/bu lbs/bu lbs/bu %
MTHW9904 MTHW9904 60.1
59.6
61.9
60.3
52.2
58.8
11.8
%
16.1
%
15.8
%
16.3
%
16.6
%
15.3
PI607557 Scholar
PI592761 Ernest
CI 17430 Newana
C982-324 Rambo
58.4
60.9
59.6
60.5
59.9
57.0
56.6
57.6
60.5
61.7
60.2
58.4
58.8
58.3
61.2
59.2
51.0
50.6
50.5
52.3
57.7
57.7
57.6
57.6
12.2
13.1
12.3
12.7
16.7
19.0
17.6
18.9
16.5
15.4
16.1
14.9
17.9
17.8
16.9
16.6
18.4
18.3
17.4
17.7
16.3
16.7
16.1
16.2
CI 17429 Lew
PI527682 Amidon
MT 9929 MT 9929
ND 695 Reeder
BZ992588 Conan
CI 13596 Fortuna
PI574642 McNeal
MTHW9710 MTHW9710
PI531005 Grandin
MT 9874 MT 9874
MTHW9420 MTHW9420
PI549275 Hi-Line
58.9
59.9
60.0
60.3
57.9
59.6
59.5
58.6
58.6
60.4
61.1
59.8
60.5
58.6
58.2
57.1
58.3
57.1
58.7
54.1
59.8
60.6
61.8
60.3
59.3
60.8
60.0
57.1
61.4
61.4
55.3
58.6
60.6
54.3
60.5
61.7
WB 926 Westbred 926 61.4
55.1
59.0
WBExpress Express 59.2
56.8
58.8
WB 936 Westbred 936 59.7
53.2
60.9
59.3
58.4
58.5
59.1
59.5
58.1
59.0
58.2
57.9
58.8
58.5
58.6
58.9
57.5
58.6
51.4
50.5
50.0
50.3
50.8
49.5
50.0
48.8
48.5
50.6
49.8
48.3
48.2
49.8
48.5
57.6
57.5
57.5
57.3
57.3
57.2
56.7
56.6
56.5
12.4
12.9
12.0
12.7
12.6
12.6
11.1
12.4
12.7
18.7
18.9
17.2
17.7
18.2
16.4
16.2
19.0
20.0
16.4
15.1
15.1
57.4
11.5
16.6
16.0
57.4
12.9
15.8
15.9
16.8
15.8
15.7
57.0
12.3
17.7
15.4
57.0
11.9
16.9
15.4
15.3
15.9
16.0
56.4
13.0
16.3
15.5
56.2
11.9
19.0
15.3
16.4
17.6
18.4
17.3
17.1
17.0
16.7
17.0
17.4
16.4
16.1
17.4
17.3
16.5
18.0
17.5
18.2
17.2
17.4
17.2
17.3
18.6
17.2
17.6
16.8
16.7
17.7
18.0
16.7
17.6
16.3
16.5
16.0
15.8
15.8
16.3
16.4
15.8
16.1
15.5
15.1
16.5
16.8
15.6
16.4
Average 60.1
57.1
60.2
CV (s/mean)*100 3.2
ns
2.2
2.1
2.3
2.3
58.8
50.1
57.3
12.4
17.6
15.7
17.1
17.5
16.1
Table 30.
Exp. 9970
Selected
Varieties
McNeal
Grandin
Fortuna
Rambo
Lew
Newana
Hi-Line
Ernest
Fergus
WB Express
WestBred 936
Scholar
MTHW 9420
Nursery Mean
Moccasin recrop spring wheat multi-year summary of selected varieties.
Central Agricultural Research Center, Moccasin, MT.
1992
39
Amidon 35
WestBred 926 29
30
27
34
34
35
29
31.1
43
46
48
49
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
------------------------------------ bu/a --------------------------------------------------
2001 Mean
52 22 45 24 63 37 42 33 33 39.0
55
51
54
44
23
23
20
24
40
42
40
35
22
23
20
22
52
58
52
48
34
36
35
33
39
34
33
37
31
31
31
33
32
32
31
29
36.3
35.9
34.6
33.2
23
20
25
21
21 40
41
39
43
39
36
47
39
21
19
23
22
20
20
23
23
24
23
55
52
49
57
48
56
57
53
51
66
33
35
35
35
34
34
34
34
33
38
36
35
36
31
30
33
40
37
35
37
31
29
31
33
30
30
31
32
33
33
28
30
32
29
27
-
34
28
35
31
34.3
33.6
36.1
34.5
31.2
35.7
36.9
35.7
35.2
38.0
48.1
22.4
40.4
21.9
54.8
34.5
35.5
31.6
31.3
McNeal
Same Years
-
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
37.3
39.5
39.5
39.5
38.6
38.6
Selected
Varieties
McNeal
Amidon
WestBred 926
Grandin
Fortuna
Rambo
Lew
Newana
Hi-Line
Ernest
Fergus
WB Express
WestBred 936
Scholar
MTHW 9420
Table 31.
Exp. 9971
Denton Re-Crop Spring Wheat Multi-Year Summary of Selected Varieties.
Central Agricultural Research Center, Moccasin, MT.
25
27
25
26
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Mean
------------------------------------ bu/a --------------------------------------------------
27 92 22 43 24 47 34 17 29 29 36.4
23
19
25
17
83
78
81
66
23
25
24
20
39
41
36
33
23
25
20
22
47
46
44
42
30
31
32
32
14
16
15
18
28
27
26
29
30
28
28
26
34.0
33.6
33.1
30.5
74
65
81
76
20
20
20
23
19 41
36
41
39
37
36
44
45
23
23
27
23
25
26
24
26
26
24
43
40
45
46
46
43
41
43
46
44
29
29
33
32
29
28
30
35
37
30
12
13
18
12
17
15
13
16
16
12
25
25
28
26
24
23
25
26
29
26
27
27
26
27
28
-
27
31
31
28
31.5
30.5
34.7
33.6
28.6
28.5
28.8
30.8
30.8
27.3
Nursery Mean 24 77 22 38 24 44 32 15 26.6
28
The variety trial was planted re-crop on pea ground in 1992, re-crop on buckwheat in 1996, and re-crop following millet in 1997. All other years the trial was planted on fallow ground.
McNeal
Same Years
-
36.4
36.4
36.4
36.4
36.4
36.4
36.4
36.4
30.6
31.8
31.8
31.8
30.0
30.0
Table 32.
Exp. 9972
Selected
Varieties
McNeal
Amidon
WestBred 926
Grandin
Fortuna
Rambo
Lew
Newana
Hi-Line
Ernest
Fergus
WB Express
WestBred 936
Scholar
MTHW 9420
Fort Benton Re-Crop Spring Wheat Multi-Year Summary of Selected Varieties.
Central Agricultural Research Center, Moccasin, MT.
1992
25
31
29
33
27
24
29
22
15
23
14
12
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
------------------------------------ bu/a --------------------------------------------------
2001 Mean
18 47 37 45 32 22 28 14 10 27.4
15
11
10
12
40
41
43
36
36
34
35
35
46
37
32
42
34
34
33
31
20
21
17
21
25
17
23
27
14
14
12
16
12
6
9
10
25.7
24.4
25.3
26.6
43
41
42
44
36
31
32
32
45
34
41
34
46
43
39
44
35
32
33
34
34
33
33
32
36
30
19
21
19
19
19
20
19
19
19
19
24
26
22
26
21
17
17
19
20
20
13
13
15
13
13
12
11
14
16
14
11
11
11
10
11
-
8
7
12
8
26.7
26.0
25.6
25.0
23.6
22.2
21.2
20.7
19.4
23.1
McNeal
Same Years
-
27.4
27.4
27.4
27.4
27.4
27.4
27.4
27.4
25.2
25.2
25.2
25.2
21.2
21.2
Nursery Mean 28.2
14.2
40.8
34.3
40.8
32.9
19.1
22.4
13.6
10
The 1991-1996 variety trials were located on Ron Long's farm; the 1997-2000 trials were located at the Birkeland farm. 1997 trial was abandoned due to an extreme wild oat infestation. All trials were planted on re-crop ground.
Table 33.
Exp. 9973
Selected
Varieties
McNeal
Amidon
WestBred 926
Grandin
Fortuna
Rambo
Lew
Newana
Hi-Line
Ernest
Fergus
WB Express
WestBred 936
Scholar
MTHW 9420
Nursery Mean
Winifred Re-Crop Spring Wheat Multi-Year Summary of Selected Varieties.
Central Agricultural Research Center, Moccasin, MT.
1998 Mean
48
53
38
44
42
46
41
44
46
39
43
34
47
40
47
1999 2000 2001
---------------------- bu/a -----------------------
37 31 24
31
36
36
36
27
23
28
29
28
24
22
24
32
34
43
38
35
31
33
35
37
37
23
28
28
27
28
24
30
27
27
28
24
-
29
26
25
27
27
26
29
25
34.7
31.6
32.5
33.0
31.9
31.4
30.0
32.6
33.5
31.3
34.0
37.6
36.1
32.8
33.4
McNeal
Same Years
-
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
34.7
42.5
35.5
27.5
26.0
Table 34.
Variety
Amidon
Ernest
Fergus
Fortuna
Grandin
Hi-Line
Lew
McNeal
MTHW 9420
Newana
Pioneer 2375
Scholar
Westbred 926
Westbred 936
WB Express
Predicted yields of selected spring wheat varieties grown in Central Montana based on previous seven years 1/ of variety performance. Central Agricultural Research Center,
Moccasin, MT.
Yield Level ( X ) in bu/a
30 45 60
Class Projected Yields ( Y ) – bu/a LY 2/ Predictive Equation R 2
HWS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
HRS
30.6
30.5
30.4
30.6
29.7
30.9
30.3
28.9
30.2
28.4
32.4
30.6
29.0
28.5
29.7
45.9
42.3
44.7
42.7
43.7
47.5
41.6
49.3
48.2
44.9
45.6
44.0
45.2
47.7
46.6
60.9
55.5
60.9
55.8
58.6
64.9
54.7
66.3
65.8
59.4
60.7
57.4
60.6
64.5
63.0
25
31
31
31
31
27
23
31
22
31
14
3/
27
31
26
28
Y = 0.9319 + 2.636 0.9767
Y = 0.8842 + 2.455 0.9733
Y = 1.0782 - 3.184
Y = 0.8717 + 3.511 0.9754
Y = 0.9910 - 0.8647 0.9761
Y = 1.1579 - 4.587
Y = 0.8766 + 2.139 0.9780
Y = 1.130 - 1.540
Y = 1.1737 - 4.643
Y = 0.9629 + 1.602 0.9775
Y = 1.010 + 0.1313 0.9814
Y = 0.8930 + 3.849 0.9813
Y = 1.0292 - 1.132
Y = 1.1202 - 2.761
Y = 1.0905 - 2.460
0.9825
0.9728
0.9876
0.9858
0.9820
0.9788
0.9788
1/ Data used to calculate predictive equations is compiled from dryland environments, fallow and no-till, in
Moccasin, Denton, Highwood, Fort Benton and Winifred from 1995 - 2001.
2/ LY = Number of Location/Years used to create the predictive regression equation.
3/ Varieties with fewer than 12 location/years may not be accurate; use equation with caution.
Data File C:\Regressions.xls
C43