MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department 8.044 Statistical Physics I Spring Term 2013

advertisement
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Physics Department
8.044 Statistical Physics I
Spring Term 2013
Solutions to Problem Set #9
Problem 1: The Big Bang
If the expansion is adiabatic, ∆S = 0.
∂F
S = −
∂T V
∂
1 π2
4
= −
−
(kT ) V
∂T
45 c3 ~3
4 π2 4 3
k T V
45 c3 ~3
=
From this result we see that the product T 3 V remains constant during the expansion. Therefore
V (3K)
30003
=
= 109
V (3000K)
33
Problem 2: Lattice Heat Capacity of Solids
a) The heat capacity of a classical harmonic oscillator is k, independent of its frequency.
# of oscillators = (3 degrees of freedom) × (J atoms/unit cell) × (N unit cells) = 3JN .
Therefore, CV = 3JN k.
b) For a quantum harmonic oscillator
1
< > = hν(< n > + )
2
< n > = (exp[hν/kT ] − 1)−1
Assuming all oscillators have the same frequency
CV
= 3JN
∂<>
∂T
= 3JN hν
∂<n>
∂T
= 3JN hν (
hν
exp[hν/kT ]
)
2
kT (exp[hν/kT ] − 1)2
1
= 3JN k (
exp[hν /kT ]
hν 2
)
kT (exp[hν/kT ] − 1)2
lim CV
= 3JN k (
hν 2
) exp[−hν/kT ]
kT
lim CV
= 3JN k
kT hν
kT hν
energy gap behavior
classical result
c i)
Z
∞
E(T ) =
D(ω) < (ω, T ) > dω
0
Z
∞
D(ω)
=
0
1
1
+
exp[~ω/kT ] − 1 2
dω
For ~ω kT , < >→ kT independent of ω. Therefore one can move it out from under the
integral.
Z ∞
lim E(T ) = kT
D(ω) dω = 3JN kT
kT ~ωmax
0
|
{z
}
3JN
lim
kT ~ωmax
CV (T ) = 3JN k
c ii)
the classical result
∞
Z
E(T ) =
|0
Z
D(ω)(~ω/2) dω +
{z
}
0
∞
~ωD(ω)
dω
exp[~ω/kT ] − 1
E0 , independent of T
For very low T one may use the low ω limiting form of D(ω) since only the oscillators with
low ω will be excited.
Z ∞
3V
1
~ω · ω 2
E(T ) = E0 + 2
dω
2π < v >3 0 exp[~ω/kT ] − 1
3
Z ∞
3V
kT
(~ω /kT )3
= E0 + 2
kT
d(~ω/kT )
2π
~<v>
exp[~ω/kT ] − 1
0
3
Z ∞
3V
kT
x3
= E0 + 2
kT
dx
2π
~<v>
ex − 1
0
|
{z
}
π4
15
3
π2
kT
= E0 +
V
kT
10
~<v>
3
2 2
kT
CV (T ) =
π V
k ∝
5
~<v>
2
T3
Note that the exponential temperature dependence associated with energy gap behavior has
been washed out by the distribution of energy gaps associated with the distribution of harmonic oscillator frequencies, some less than kT at any reasonable value of the temperature.
Problem 3: Thermal Noise in Circuits I, Mean-Square Voltages and Currents
a) The energy stored in the capacitor, E = 12 Cv 2 , acts as the Hamiltonian for this small
subsystem. We can then apply the results of the canonical ensemble.
1
p(v) ∝ exp[− Cv 2 /kT ]
2
−1/2
kT
=
2π
exp[−v 2 /2(kT /C)]
C
when normalized
Now we do the numbers.
kT = 1.4 × 10−23 × 300 = 4.2 × 10−21 joules
C = 100 pF = 10−10 F
< v 2 > = kT /C = 42 × 10−12
p
√
< v2 > =
kT /C = 6.5 × 10−6 = 6.5 µV
b) Now the energy stored in the inductor, the effective Hamiltonian for the subsystem, is
E = 12 Li2 .
1
p(i) ∝ exp[− Li2 /kT ]
2
−1/2
kT
=
2π
exp[−i2 /2(kT /L)]
L
when normalized
Again we do the numbers.
L = 1 mH = 10−3 H
< i2 > = kT /L = 4.2 × 10−18
p
√
< i2 > =
kT /L = 2 × 10−9 A = 2nA
3
c) This method does not work for a resistor since it does not store energy; rather, it is
completely dissipative. One can not, for example, write a Hamiltonian which describes only
the voltage and current associated with the resistor. Of course, if the R were in parallel with
a C or in series with an L one could make use of the above results. These are two particularly
simple examples of the general result that the thermal voltage one would measure across a
resistor (RMS) depends on the circuit to which it is connected. Note that this is not the
case for a C or an L as shown above.
Problem 4: Thermal Noise in Circuits II, Johnson Noise of a Resistor
a) For a line of length L which is short circuited at each end,
En (x, t) = En sin (nπ x/L) sin(ωn t + φn )
| {z }
kn x
n = 1, 2, 3, · · ·
kn = n(π/L)
Then ωn = ckn and φn is some fixed time phase factor. Only one polarization direction is
~ is always in the radial direction.
allowed on a transmission line. For a coaxial cable E
b)
#(ω < ω0 ) = #(k < ω0 /c) = (ω0 /c)/(π/L) =
D(ω) =
d#(ω)
L
=
dω
πc
ω0 L
πc
a constant
c) Each mode is an independent harmonic oscillator, so
1
< n > = ~ω (exp[~ω/kT ] − 1)−1 + ~ω
2
D(ω) < n (ω) >
L
L 1
1
−1
=
~ω (exp[~ω/kT ] − 1) + ~ω
πc L
2
u(ω, T ) =
d) When kT ~ω, < n >→ kT . Then
u(ω, T ) →
L
πc
1
kT
(kT ) =
L
πc
Note that this result for the double energy density (per unit length, per unit frequency
interval) on the transmission line is independent of the frequency in this frequency region
(low frequencies).
4
e) Consider the standing wave modes to be made up of two waves propagating in opposite
directions. Then the thermal energy flow in each direction is
c
kT
u(ω, T ) =
.
2
2π
If this flows from the line into the resistor, then by detailed balance in thermal equilibrium
an equal amount must flow out:
kT
Pn (ω) =
.
2π
f)
∆ν = 10 MHz = 107 s−1
∆ω = 2π∆ν = 2π × 107 s−1
Pn (ω)∆ω =
kT
× 2π × 107 s−1
2π
= 1.38 × 10−16 ergs/K × 300 K × 107 s−1
= 4.1 × 10−7 ergs/sec
=
4.1 × 10−14 watts
Problem 5: Thermal Noise in Circuits III, Circuit Model for a Real Resistor
a)
vline =
R
vN (ω)
R+R
1
vN (ω)
2
D v2 E
1
2
< vN
(ω) >
= line =
R
4R
=
Power
line
b)
kT
1
2
2
=
< vN
(ω) > ⇒ < vN
(ω) >= 2RkT /π
2π
4R
5
c) We are told that for the circuit shown
< vC2 (ω) >=
1
< v02 (ω) >
1 + (RCω)2
when v0 (ω) is a random noise signal with zero mean. Identify R with the ideal resistor in
the model of a real resistor in thermal equilibrium and v0 (ω) with the noise source voltage
vN (ω) in the model. Then
< vC2 (ω) > =
1
2
(ω) >
< vN
1 + (RCω)2
2
R
kT
π
1 + (RCω)2
Z ∞
2
< vC > =
< vC2 (ω) > dω
=
0
∞
2
=
kT
π
Z
2 kT
=
π C
Z
2 kT
π C
Z
=
0
∞
1
d(RCω)
1 + (RCω)2
∞
dx
kT
=
2
C
1+x
{z }
0
|0
R
dω
1 + (RCω)2
π/2
This is just the result we found using the canonical ensemble on the capacitor alone.
THE THERMAL NOISE IN A CIRCUIT CAN BE THOUGHT OF (AND
QUANTITATIVELY MODELED) AS ARISING FROM THE DISSIPATIVE
ELEMENTS IN THE SYSTEM.
6
MIT OpenCourseWare
http://ocw.mit.edu
8.044 Statistical Physics I
Spring 2013
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
Download