Report to the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission
2006–2007
1.
Title:
Green Bean Breeding and Evaluation
2.
Project Leaders:
James R. Myers, Horticulture
3.
Cooperator:
Brian Yorgey, Food Science and Technology
4.
Project Status:
Terminating 30 June, 2007
5.
Project Funding:
$55,269
$10,564
$65,833
breeding
processing
total
Breeding funds were used for a major portion of the support of a vegetable breeding technician, student labor, supplies, and research farm expenses. Processing
funds were used for processing samples of experimental beans, laboratory analysis, and for student labor.
6.
7.
Objectives:
1.
Breed Bush Blue Lake green bean varieties with high economic yield and
improved plant architecture.
2.
Improve pod characteristics including straightness, color, smoothness, texture, flavor and quality retention, and combine with delayed seed size development.
3.
Incorporate white mold resistance and improve root rot tolerance.
4.
Map genes for resistance to white mold to facilitate marker aided selection.
Report of Progress:
Varietal Development: The program continued with crosses among elite lines and commercial cultivars of green bean for varietal development. Advanced lines were grown at
the Hermiston Research and Extension Center and were screened for heat tolerance and
general adaptation to growing conditions east of the Cascades. Much of our current focus
is on incorporating white mold resistance into a BBL background. Additional selections
from OSU x OSU crosses were advanced and increased for replicated trials. Advanced
lines were screened in replicated root rot and white mold field nurseries. An interspecific
population with white mold resistance from scarlet runner bean was screened in the field
nursery. Seed increase, roguing, and sub-line maintenance of the most promising lines
was continued.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Yield Trials: We retained our current nursery structure of preliminary trials and a single
advanced trial consisting mostly of commercial varieties for trial along with the most
promising OSU lines. The two preliminary trials were planted (May 4 and June 6), and
the commercial yield trial partially funded by seed companies was planted June 21. Entries from one preliminary trial and those paid for by sponsoring seed companies in the
commercial trial were processed at the OSU Pilot Plant for subsequent product evaluation.
Both preliminary trials had good growing conditions and showed reasonable
yields (Tables 1-2, 6-7) although June 6 trial flowered and set pods during a hot spell. We
were able to obtain data on heat tolerance in this trial (Table 5). A number of full- and
small-sieve lines in the May 4 trial showed high yields (Tables 1 & 2). We are particularly interested in the 6400 series lines as these show better BBL characteristics than the
6200 and 6300 series, and some may have improved white mold resistance. Most 6200
and 6300 series crosses have white mold resistance derived from NY6020, an Andean
type snap bean, or Ascher DR, a dry bean. Neither of these crosses have produced useable BBL types from single cross combinations. On the other hand, the 6400 series derives from crosses to B7354-6-2-2, a white mold resistant BBL breeding that in of itself is
very unproductive, but has acceptable pod quality. The low productivity does not appear
to be transmitted to its progeny as exemplified by lines 6479 and 6480 derived from the
cross OSU5651/B7354-6-2-2 (Tables 1 & 6). Grading room evaluation and notes suggest
that few of the 6200 and 6300 series are directly useable, but that the 6400 series material
holds promise (Tables 3 & 4, 8 & 9). Much of this material is being tested for the first
year, and will need additional testing to verify performance and quality.
Four year average for selected OSU Minuette
crosses and check lines
Several Minuette derived
lines continue to perform well.
Most promising in the full sieve
Adjusted T/A
class are OSU 6137 and OSU 6189,
Overwhile OSU 6174 and OSU 6175 are
all
z
Line
2003
2004
2005
2006
AV
4-to 5sieve lines of interest. Four
OR 91G
12.5
12.6
3.8
12.1
10.3
year average yield performance is
OR 54
13.4
16.4
9.2
10.7
12.4
shown in the text table. While OSU
5630
13.8
14.7
10.8
12.9
13.1
6137 will on occasion have very
5613
9.3
5.0
5.1
5.7
6.3
high yields, its long term average is
5669
16.0
12.5
8.5
10.4
11.9
not much different from OR91G. It
6137
12.9
8.8
13.7
10.5
11.2
6174
11.0
8.1
9.5
7.3
9.0
does have darker green pod color
6175
11.4
11.2
10.1
7.7
10.1
and pods set high on the plant.
6185
9.9
8.1
6.0
With average pod set, it stands well
6189
10.5
12.4
8.6
9.4
10.2
but lodges with heavy set. OSU
LSD
2.8
3.9
2.9
3.0
3.0
6189 is very close to a BBL type but
z
Average of 2 trials; all other years are from 1 trial
with significantly darker pod color
only.
and better growth habit. It is also
interesting in that it shows more uniform growth habit across environments compared to
other lines. Both are full sieve types. OSU 6174 and OSU 6175 are both 4 to 5-sieve
types with upright growth habit, and pod characteristics similar to the BBL type.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
In the June 6 trial a nearly identical set of the 44 full sieve, 49 small sieve, and
seven checks were grown (Tables 5-9). Where OR 91G and Savannah (four-sieve check)
received a 5 on our heat tolerance scale, several experimental lines showed greater tolerance of heat stress (Table 5). Some of the variability in heat tolerance may be due to
some lines not podding during times of extreme heat, so additional tests are needed.
Yields in this trial were generally lower, and only one line (OSU 6436) outperformed OR
91G. In the first trial, this entry had yield similar to the check.
Commercial Green Bean Trial: The commercial trial consisted of 16 entries from four
seed companies, six checks, and four OSU experimental lines (Table 10). Savannah and
Concessa from Harris Moran, and Medinah from Rogers were included as small sieve
checks. The trial grew under near ideal conditions, which produced very lush growth. As
a result, white mold became an issue towards the end of the harvest period, and may have
reduced yields on late harvested entries. Overall production and $/A value was high
(Tables 10 & 11, Figures 1 & 2). SB 4285 again this year performed well in this trial and
it was the entry most similar to a bush blue lake (BBL) type (Table 12). While not well
adapted to the Willamette Valley, the entries from Starke Ayres were very robust, apparently responding to the nutrients available in this trial. They appear to be very efficient in
nutrient use and might be a source of germplasm for increasing nitrogen use efficiency.
Some of these lines are high yielding, but very indeterminate – apparently a difference in
concentration of set when grown under South African conditions. This trial was evaluated for white mold incidence in the two unpicked reps (Table 13). We found a gradient across the trial perpendicular to the reps, which meant some varieties by chance
landed on the heavily infected or lightly infected sides of the trial. However, the evaluation was interesting in that it was the first economic evaluation of the NY6020 source of
resistance, which had been incorporated into OSU 6230. In general, this line did not
seem to possess any greater white mold resistance than other trial entries. This result is
confusing because in our replicated white mold trials, NY6020 derived materials show
clear increases in resistance.
Root rot trial: Approximately 200 lines, including checks were grown in a root rot trial at
the Vegetable Research Farm (Table 14). Material could be divided into three groups: B
7730 series lines that are BBL crosses to FR 266 (a root rot resistant kidney breeding
line), GF series (a recombinant inbred line [RIL] population developed from the cross
Goldcrop by FR266), and the GW series (RIL population from the cross Goldcrop x Wis
36 RR). The GW and GF populations are being used to map quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to root rot. The B7730 series lines are being used to develop breeding lines with improved resistance. The susceptible check, OSU 5446, had a rating of 7.2
while the most resistant check, RR6950, was rated as 1.1. Nine of the B7700 series and
six of the GF-GW materials had a rating of 4.5 or less and were significantly better than
OR 91G.
Breeding for White and Gray Mold Resistance: A white mold trial was grown at the
Vegetable Research Farm (Table 15). Because of the warm dry late summer and fall, infection was late in appearance, but sufficient disease was observed that allowed separation of resistant and susceptible lines. Several common bean lines have been identified
that have partial resistance to white mold. These include several OSU BBL breeding
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
lines, G 122, a cranberry bean, NY 6020-5, a snap bean line, and Ascher DR, a dark red
kidney bean line. These have been crossed with elite BBL lines using the backcrossinbred method to recover resistance in an acceptable plant type. Twenty-six 6200 and
6300 series and 22 6400 series lines had significantly better scores than 91G. While none
have been grown in long term (seven year) trials (Table 16), some (OSU 6230, 6256, and
6267) have two or more years of data, and show a similar response between years (Table
17). These three have the NY6020 source of resistance but are not acceptable qualitywise. White mold incidence and growth habit were negatively correlated in the 2006 trial, indicating that architectural type probably influenced microenvironment and thereby
severity of white mold infection (text table, below). Interestingly higher yield and upright
habit were positively correlated, and yield and white mold score were negatively correlated, suggesting that disease had an effect on yield, and this was influenced by growth
habit.
Molecular mapping to transfer resistance from Phaseolus coccineus to P. vulgaCorrelations among white mold and yield
ris: The best source of resistance to white
variables for a white mold field screening
trial, Corvallis, 2006.
mold resides in the related bean species, P.
coccineus or scarlet runner bean. We have
been developing backcross-inbred populaYield
Upright Habit
tions as a means of transferring resistance
while regaining the snap bean type as rapidly
White Mold Scores
-0.47***
-0.36***
as possible. We are furthest along with the
cross 91G x PI 255956. It has been tested
Yield
0.37***
twice in the field (Table 18), in three straw
***statistically significant at p<0.0001.
tests in the greenhouse, and in an oxalate test
(oxalate tolerance is related to white mold resistance) as shown in table 19. In the field
test, six lines were as good as G122, our resistant check. These lines are genetically approximately 90% common bean and 10% scarlet runner bean, and as such, will require
another cycle of recombination to move resistance into a completely adapted background.
At the same time that we have been testing physiological resistance, we have been looking for molecular markers associated with resistance and to date; we have approximately
a dozen candidate quantitative trait loci on four linkage groups.
We also tested a number of common bean lines that had either been parents in populations developed to screen for white mold resistance, or had been identified to have partial
resistance. In general, we found an association between white mold resistance and oxalate tolerance (Table 20). Resistant parents in recombinant inbred populations were more
tolerant than susceptible parents used to create those populations. There were some unusual findings, such as OR 5630 (susceptible to white mold) having similar levels of oxalate tolerance as NY6020-4 (resistant to white mold); as well as two lines that are resistant to white mold (I9365-31 and Asher) but not tolerant to oxalate (Table 20). These
results would suggests that oxalate tolerance is not the only factor conditioning white
mold resistance, and that other forms of resistance may be derived independently of oxalate tolerance.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Trialing in Hermiston and heat tolerance ratings: Approximately 240 lines were tested
for adaptation to growing conditions in Hermiston. These were planted May 16, and then
rated and harvested upon physiological maturity. We included Sahara (Harris Moran) as a
heat tolerant check. This variety did have good yield under these conditions although pod
quality was not the best. Nine OSU lines were identified that may have heat tolerance
based on high scores and acceptable yield (Table 21). While correlation is low with the
heat ratings from the second preliminary trial, we do see the same 25% in the top group
for each location. We also harvested seed and can evaluate it for quality when produced
under the hot, arid conditions of the Columbia Basin.
8.
Summary:
We continued to emphasize breeding for white mold resistance in 2006. As such, we focused on preliminary yield and quality trials where we could evaluate larger numbers of
lines. Two preliminary trials were conducted, and an advanced trial of commercial entries was evaluated. OSU 6400 series lines look very good for yield and processing quality, and some have partial white mold resistance. In addition to the white mold resistance
breeding effort, about 200 lines were screened for root rot resistance. White mold evaluations consisted of greenhouse straw tests of many breeding lines, field evaluation of advanced breeding lines, and the development and evaluation of interspecific populations
for additional sources of resistance. To date, we have identified some lines that are fairly
close to a BBL type with partial resistance to white mold, but additional refinement is required.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 1. Performance of preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Percent Sieve Size
Line
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
6137
6175
6189
6239
6284
6290
6300
6313
6338
6436
6437
6438
6439
6440
6443
6445
6446
6459
6463
6467
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
6479
6480
6481
6484
6485
6488
6489
6490
6492
6493
6494
6497
6498
Days to
Harvest
74
77
75
76
76
76
76
75
77
74
75
76
75
76
76
76
75
76
75
76
74
77
74
76
77
75
76
77
76
76
75
75
77
77
74
77
75
76
75
77
76
77
Est.
Sieve
Size
full
full
full
full
full
5
full
full
full
5
full
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
full
full
5
full
full
5
full
full
full
5
5
full
full
full
5
full
5
5
5
5
full
Stand
150
114
140
150
145
150
150
141
150
150
145
150
150
141
150
150
150
150
150
150
145
150
150
150
147
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
124
150
150
150
150
1
4.2
3.0
4.3
2.9
4.0
3.6
0.9
1.4
1.5
6.0
3.0
1.7
6.4
3.2
6.0
1.7
4.3
5.0
4.6
2.3
5.0
2.7
4.5
6.4
1.4
6.4
5.0
1.6
2.2
3.0
2.0
5.7
2.7
3.9
5.6
2.5
3.7
2.6
3.8
1.6
2.2
2.2
2
5.6
6.8
5.8
5.1
6.3
8.9
2.6
2.9
4.6
9.5
6.7
4.3
7.6
7.2
7.5
5.0
6.4
6.4
5.9
6.2
8.0
5.3
6.8
9.6
4.1
11.2
8.4
6.4
3.6
6.1
5.9
8.9
4.1
4.6
7.0
4.3
8.1
5.1
9.4
3.9
5.5
3.9
3
9.9
14.4
11.6
11.8
16.7
15.2
6.1
7.2
11.5
19.8
13.3
12.9
14.6
16.0
14.2
13.2
16.3
14.2
13.1
13.1
19.0
12.7
14.3
17.6
11.6
19.2
21.0
11.2
13.7
15.2
15.0
18.7
12.2
12.4
11.3
11.7
15.4
12.0
18.9
11.6
12.1
7.3
4
33.1
41.7
50.7
41.9
40.5
38.4
25.2
21.7
35.1
44.8
35.6
44.8
44.6
45.6
40.3
41.3
44.0
41.1
41.2
41.5
43.0
32.7
34.6
31.2
41.5
40.0
39.5
42.4
43.2
45.1
52.3
45.5
38.1
45.1
22.5
40.5
49.3
42.7
43.4
45.7
37.4
30.9
z
y
5
38.0
31.8
24.6
36.0
28.6
32.1
40.9
44.9
42.0
18.1
37.0
32.8
22.9
26.4
29.9
35.5
27.0
30.5
33.3
34.6
22.0
37.3
31.6
28.0
40.8
20.0
24.4
36.8
34.5
29.3
23.5
21.1
40.8
32.7
23.9
37.4
23.5
36.8
22.6
35.7
36.3
47.2
6
9.2
2.3
2.9
2.2
4.0
1.8
24.3
21.7
5.3
1.7
4.4
3.4
3.8
1.6
2.2
3.3
2.1
2.8
2.0
2.3
3.0
9.3
8.3
7.2
0.7
3.2
1.7
1.6
2.9
1.2
1.3
0.0
2.0
1.3
29.6
3.7
0.0
0.9
1.9
1.6
6.6
8.4
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
%1-4
Sieve
52.8
65.9
72.5
61.8
67.5
66.1
34.8
33.3
52.7
80.2
58.5
63.8
73.2
72.0
67.9
61.2
70.9
66.7
64.7
63.1
75.0
53.3
60.2
64.8
58.5
76.8
73.9
61.6
62.6
69.5
75.2
78.9
57.1
66.0
46.5
58.9
76.5
62.4
75.5
62.8
57.1
44.4
Av
Tons/
Acre
12.9
11.6
12.4
12.3
11.7
10.3
10.0
6.4
12.0
10.3
12.2
10.5
13.5
10.9
12.4
11.0
12.3
12.9
13.3
12.1
8.5
13.6
11.9
11.1
13.2
11.1
11.1
11.6
12.5
14.9
13.4
10.7
13.5
13.7
6.1
14.7
12.3
10.5
9.3
11.9
9.0
15.9
Av Adj
x
Tons/Acre
13.3
13.4
15.2
13.7
13.8
11.9
8.5
5.3
12.4
13.1
13.3
12.0
16.6
13.3
14.7
12.2
14.8
15.1
15.3
13.7
10.7
14.0
13.1
12.8
14.4
14.1
13.8
13.0
14.2
17.9
16.7
13.8
14.4
15.8
5.9
16.0
15.6
11.8
11.7
13.5
9.6
15.0
Table 1. Performance of preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
Percent Sieve Size
Line
6499
6500
6501
LSD@5%
Days to
Harvest
77
77
77
Est.
Sieve
Size
full
5
5
Stand
150
143
150
1
1.4
3.4
2.2
2
4.1
3.4
5.2
3
12.9
8.7
14.2
4
38.8
36.9
42.5
z
y
5
40.8
46.3
35.1
6
2.0
1.3
0.7
z
%1-4
Sieve
57.1
52.3
64.2
Mean of 2 replications; subplots of 5' were harvested from single 20' plots in rows 30" apart.
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
x
Tons/Acre adjusted to 50% 1-4 sieve.
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Av
Tons/
Acre
13.5
13.5
12.2
3.0
Av Adj
x
Tons/Acre
14.3
13.8
13.9
3.4
Table 2. Performance of preliminary small sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Percent Sieve Size
Line
5613
6174
6256
6267
6268
6274
6312-1
6312-18
6312-20
6318
6323
6329
6340
6342
6346
6375
6393
6434
6441
6442
6444
6447
6448
6449
6450
6451
6452
6453
6454
6455
6456
6457
6458
6461
6462
6464
6466
6468
6470
6472
6473
6476
Days to
Harvest
74
75
76
74
77
77
74
74
74
74
75
74
75
74
74
74
74
77
74
74
74
75
75
74
74
74
74
74
74
76
74
76
77
76
75
75
76
77
74
75
75
76
Est.
Sieve
Size
3
4-5
4
4-5
4
4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4-5
4
4
4
4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
3
3
3
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4-5
4
4
4-5
4
4-5
Stand
150
150
150
150
150
138
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
121
150
147
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
128
150
129
142
150
106
150
140
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
1
11.5
8.0
4.5
10.0
8.3
2.2
6.8
4.5
4.4
6.6
5.5
6.0
3.6
7.6
6.1
8.7
9.8
4.2
5.4
7.2
5.5
7.1
11.4
17.3
14.5
5.2
5.1
7.4
5.2
7.1
7.6
5.9
1.6
1.1
3.4
4.6
3.0
2.6
6.9
5.8
6.1
2.3
2
26.9
10.0
10.2
11.4
6.9
10.0
11.3
11.7
9.6
11.6
8.9
11.2
9.3
12.6
11.3
14.1
13.7
10.9
8.8
12.8
11.8
20.2
23.9
29.3
14.5
9.5
8.9
14.8
8.6
9.2
7.6
13.7
6.5
3.4
12.6
11.0
12.0
3.4
15.7
9.4
12.3
4.6
3
56.4
21.0
28.4
20.0
36.1
30.0
24.1
22.5
21.3
23.1
15.8
26.1
15.0
28.6
32.2
30.4
26.5
22.7
20.4
22.4
22.8
56.0
43.2
45.3
20.5
20.7
20.3
21.0
19.0
13.3
17.2
25.5
21.0
20.2
32.2
21.1
21.0
14.7
25.5
19.6
21.9
11.5
z
y
4
5.1
44.0
54.5
44.3
36.1
45.6
40.6
45.0
45.6
46.3
51.4
47.0
48.6
45.4
46.1
41.3
43.1
47.9
48.3
44.0
47.2
15.5
21.6
8.0
42.2
44.8
45.6
38.3
55.2
38.8
51.0
34.3
52.4
64.0
48.3
54.1
42.0
66.4
45.1
54.3
48.2
44.3
5
0.0
17.0
2.3
12.9
12.5
12.2
14.3
13.5
18.4
10.7
18.5
9.0
22.9
5.9
4.3
5.4
6.9
12.6
14.3
12.0
10.2
1.2
0.0
0.0
8.4
17.2
17.7
14.8
12.1
28.6
16.6
19.6
17.7
11.2
3.4
9.2
21.0
12.9
6.9
10.9
11.4
35.9
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
6
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
0.0
3.0
2.7
0.7
1.7
0.0
0.7
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
2.7
1.6
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
2.5
3.7
0.0
3.1
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
%1-4
sieve
100.0
83.0
97.7
85.7
87.5
87.8
82.7
83.8
80.9
87.6
81.5
90.3
76.4
94.1
95.7
94.6
93.1
85.7
83.0
86.4
87.4
98.8
100.0
100.0
91.6
80.2
79.7
81.5
87.9
68.4
83.4
79.4
81.5
1.0
96.6
90.8
78.0
87.1
93.1
89.1
88.6
62.6
Av
tons/acre
7.1
8.9
8.1
6.2
7.6
8.4
11.5
9.9
11.9
10.4
12.9
11.8
12.0
10.5
10.1
8.3
8.9
10.9
13.1
11.0
11.5
7.4
7.7
6.7
7.4
10.1
7.2
6.9
10.4
9.1
12.6
8.3
11.6
8.4
7.6
10.1
8.9
10.4
9.2
12.3
10.6
11.8
Table 2. Performance of preliminary small sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006
z
(cont.)
Percent Sieve Size
Line
6482
6483
6486
6487
6491
6496
6503
Savannah
LSD@5%
Days to
Harvest
77
74
76
74
75
76
75
76
Est.
Sieve
Size
4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
Stand
124
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
1
5.0
3.3
3.1
5.6
1.6
2.1
4.1
4.4
2
10.9
8.9
7.8
10.4
7.0
6.3
8.1
14.4
3
20.8
15.6
18.8
19.2
19.4
16.8
16.9
41.1
y
4
51.5
50.0
49.2
49.6
50.4
50.3
50.7
40.0
5
10.9
21.1
20.3
14.4
20.9
23.8
20.3
0.0
z
6
1.0
1.1
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.0
0.0
%1-4
sieve
88.1
77.8
78.9
84.8
78.3
75.5
79.7
100.0
Mean of 2 replications; subplots of 5' were harvested from single 20' plots in rows 30" apart.
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Av
tons/acre
9.6
8.3
11.9
10.6
11.6
12.8
13.2
8.4
2.3
Table 3. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Flavor
v
Line
91G
OR 54
Pod
Length
(cm)
17.0
16.5
Pod
Straightz
ness
3
5
Pod
Cross
y
Section
round
round
Pod
Smoothx
ness
5
5
Pod
w
Color
5
6
Sweetness
6
7
Astringency
5
7
Beaniness
7
7
Perfuminess
1
1
5630
5669
15.5
16.0
5
6
round
round
5
6
5
6
5
7
7
1
6137
15.0
6
round
4
8
6175
16.5
8
round
8
7
6189
15.0
5
round
5
7
6239
6284
15.0
7
round
5
6
7
7
6
1
6290
6300
6313
6338
6436
17.0
15.5
15.0
15.0
15.0
7
5
5
3
7
round
round
round
cb
round
5
5
4
5
5
5
6
5
4
5
3
6
7
7
5
5
1
1
7
5
7
1
6437
16.0
8
round
5
7
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
u
Getting seedy without sizing up
Seed development starting in larger sv
sizes
Very few 6 sv beans but getting seedy
Dark green shiny bean; full of off types
including widely varying lengths, dark
green ovals, light green non-shiny round
Long, straight, dark green; just starting to
get seedy in
6 sv
Missed; pods are bumpy but still not very
seedy in
5 sv
A mix of types including dark round small
pods (4 sv?), long light smooth pods (5
sv?) and a true flat (more than 1 plant)
that looks like a romano
Getting seedy
Fairly straight, attractive pods; segregating for strings
Nice full sv BBL type
Bumpy pods with skips
Many curly pods especially in 6 sv
Getting seedy and bumpy
Very long, very straight dark green bean
but length is somewhat variable
Line
6438
6439
6440
6443
6445
6446
6459
6463
6467
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
6479
6480
6481
6484
Table 3. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont).
v
Flavor
Pod
Pod
Pod
Pod
PerfuLength StraightCross
SmoothPod
Sweet- Astrin- Beanimiz
y
x
w
u
(cm)
ness
Section
ness
Color
ness
gency
ness
ness
Notes
Very long, dark bean; straight for such a
16.0
8
round
5
8
long bean
round to
17.0
5
cb
5
5
7
7
5
1
Nice looking pods
Getting seedy; may be a mix of a long 5
16.0
7
round
7
6
sv and a shorter 4 sv
17.0
7
round
5
5
7
7
7
1
Very attractive pods
16.0
7
cb
5
7
Long, fairly straight pods
Light color; curved particularly in 5 and 6
15.0
2
cb
7
2
7
5
3
1
sv
15.5
5
oval mix
5
3
5
7
5
1
Discard - oval mix
15.0
3
cb
5
3
7
5
5
1
Light colored pods with consistent curve
Best beans are very long and straight, but
also has shorter pods with end crooks
(also lighter color)--notes apply to long
17.0
8
round
8
6
straight beans
15.0
6
round
8
5
4 sv pods starting to get junky
15.5
6
round
5
5
3
5
5
1
Very straight for such long pods; heavy
18.0
7
round
3
4
7
3
1
7
battering in grader
16.0
7
round
7
5
7
7
5
1
Very nice pod appearance; good flavor
Some very long beans; may be getting
15.0
5
round
7
4
seedy before reaching full size potential
16.0
6
cb
5
5
4 sv pods getting junky
16.0
5
round
5
5
5
5
9
1
Starting to get seedy
14.5
4
round
7
5
5
5
7
1
Starting to get seedy
15.0
4
round
5
5
5
5
7
1
Reverse curve
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Line
6485
6488
6489
6490
6492
6493
6494
6497
6498
6499
6500
6501
Table 3. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont).
v
Flavor
Pod
Pod
Pod
Pod
PerfuLength StraightCross
SmoothPod
Sweet- Astrin- Beanimiz
y
x
w
u
(cm)
ness
Section
ness
Color
ness
gency
ness
ness
Notes
Color light but acceptable; 4 sv getting
16.0
6
round
6
4
seedy and junky; picks nicely
Huge flabby pods; many parthenocarpic
pods in 1-3 sv; only moderate seed de16.0
3
cb
5
1
7
7
5
1
velopment in 6 sv
16.0
5
round
7
4
7
7
5
1
Color too light
16.0
7
round
6
4
Long and fairly straight
Some very long beans; getting seedy in 4,
15.0
7
round
8
5
5 and 6 sv; 3 sv junky
Very nice appearance; very straight and
17.0
7
round
7
5
6
7
5
1
smooth for such a long pod
16.5
7
round
7
4
5
7
5
1
Nice pods but color a bit light;
16.0
8
round
7
5
Long, attractive pods
15.0
5
round
7
5
5
7
5
1
Getting seedy but missed by 1 or 2 days
Probably prime tomorrow; little seed de15.5
6
round
7
5
velopment
Missed by a day; 5 sv seedy and 4 sv
15.0
6
round
5
4
getting junky
15.0
7
round
5
5
Some very long beans
z
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest
Cross section: cb = crease-back
x
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest
w
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest
v
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 strongest
u
BBL=bush blue lake; sv=sieve
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 4. Notes on preliminary small sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Flavor
v
Pod
Length
(cm)
13
15
Pod
Straightz
ness
7
7
Pod
Cross
y
Section
heart
round
Pod
Smoothx
ness
7
5
Pod
w
Color
5
7
Sweetness
5
7
Astringency
5
5
Beaniness
3
7
Perfuminess
1
3
6267
10.5
6
round to
heart
5
5
5
9
3
1
6268
14
7
round
7
4
6274
6312-1
6312-18
6312-20
6318
6323
6329
6340
13.5
15.5
16
15
15
13.5
14
15.5
7
5
5
5
7
6
3
6
heart
round
round
heart
round
round
round
round
7
6
5
5
7
5
6
5
3
6
5
5
5
5
6
5
7
7
1
5
8
6
1
7
5
5
7
5
7
3
5
5
7
5
7
5
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6342
6346
14
14.5
6
5
5
7
5
5
5
5
6
7
5
5
1
1
6375
14.5
6
7
5
5
5
5
1
Fairly smooth attractive bean
6393
14.5
6
round
round
round to
cb
round to
cb
Stubby pods
Full of flats, ovals and hooked pods; discard
Full of flats, ovals and hooked pods; discard
Very attractive long dark green pods
Seed developing in 4-6 sv pods
Poor flavor; seed developing in 4-6 sv pods
Seed developing in 4-6 sv pods
Seed developing in 4 and 5 sv pods
Seed developing in 4-6 sv pods
Seed developing in 4-6 sv pods
Seed developing in 4 and 5 sv pods; 3 sv
ok but junky
Seed developing in 4 and 5 sv pods
7
5
7
5
5
1
6434
15
5
oval to
round
7
5
Seed developing in 4 and 5 sv pods
Too many ovals to grade properly; round
beans 5 sv are not yet seedy but ovals are
very seedy; notes are for round 5 sv beans
Line
5613
6174
6256
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
u
Prime on this date
Very attractive dark green podded line
Predominately oval and stringy; there are a
few short, dark 3 sv beans that may be the
intended type; discard
Table 4. Notes on preliminary small sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont).
Flavor
v
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
y
Section
Pod
Smoothx
ness
Pod
w
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
6441
15.5
7
round
7
5
5
7
7
1
6442
15.5
5
round
6
6
7
5
7
1
6444
6447
6448
6449
16
13
12.5
13
6
9
8
7
7
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
7
7
6
3
7
7
5
9
5
5
5
7
1
1
1
1
6450
6451
6452
6453
6454
16
15.5
13
16.5
17
3
1
5
1
5
7
3
5
7
5
4
1
5
3
5
8
7
5
5
7
7
3
5
7
5
5
5
7
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
6455
6456
16
16
3
3
round
round
heart
heart
oval to
heart
cb
cb
round
heart
round to
heart
round
6
4
3
5
5
9
3
3
6457
14
6
7
4
6458
15
4
heart
mostly
oval,
some
round
7
2
3
3
7
3
6461
15
7
heart
9
2
6462
17
7
round
7
3
5
7
3
1
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Notes
Attractive pods; seed developing in 4-6 sv
pods
3 and 4 sv pods very attractive; 5 and 6 sv
pods are curved
segregating for flats; seed developing in 46 sv pods
Attractive pods
Dry bean pod flavor
Very similar to 5613
Fairly attractive smooth bean but light color
Contains an oval off-type; light color
Best of series
Curly pods, tough pod skin
Prime on this date; attractive
Prime yesterday; seed developing in 4-6 sv
pods; strong fish hook, slight strings
Fair appearance
Fairly long, slightly curved, light colored
pods
Too light in color and oval; discard
Many oval rogues and some flat stringy
rogues; long, smooth pods; poor color
Very long slender pods but color too light;
tough pod texture; very concentrated set
Table 4. Notes on preliminary small sieve green bean lines, May 4 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont).
Flavor
Line
6464
6466
Pod
Length
(cm)
12
14
Pod
Straightz
ness
5
7
Pod
Cross
y
Section
round
round
Pod
Smoothx
ness
5
7
Pod
w
Color
5
5
6468
6470
6472
14
16
15.5
7
6
6
round
round
round
8
7
5
6473
6476
6482
15
14
14
9
3
5
round
round
round
6483
6486
6487
6491
6496
6503
Savannah
12
15
15.5
14
15
14
14
7
7
7
7
5
7
7
cb
round
round
round
round
round
round
v
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
3
7
5
7
3
5
5
5
5
1
1
6
6
9
4
3
7
7
7
5
1
5
6
7
8
4
6
9
3
5
5
4
4
4
6
9
5
5
1
7
7
7
1
z
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest
Cross section: cb = crease-back
x
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest
w
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest
v
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 strongest
u
sv=sieve
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Notes
Short, junky pods with skips
Prime on this date
Segregating ovals; color too light; prime on
this date
Long, very attractive dark green bean
Probably picked 1 or 2 days early
Very attractive long straight beans; probably a true 4 sv with very long pods
Seed development in 5 and 6 sv; 4 sv OK
Seed development in 5 and 6 sv; 4 sv OK
Short stubby pods; light color; rhizoctonia
spots on pods
Long straight pods
Long, relatively straight, attractive pods
Long and straight
Bumpy pods; even 3 sv look bumpy
Prime on this date
4 sv pods starting to get seedy
Table 5. Field notes from a preliminary bean trial, June 6 planting,
Corvallis, Oregon, 2006
Line
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
5613
6137
6174
6175
6189
6239
6256
6267
6268
6274
6284
6290
6300
6312-1
6312-11
6312-18
6312-20
6313
6318
6323
6329
6338
6340
6342
6346
6375
6393
6404
6434
6436
6437
6438
6439
6440
6441
6442
6443
6444
Est.
Sieve
Size
full
full
full
full
3
full
4-5
5
full
full
4
4-5
4
4
full
5
full
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
5
4-5
4-5
4
5
4-5
4
4
4
4
4-5
4-5
5
5
5
5
5
4-5
4-5
5
4-5
Heat Tolez
rance
5
3
7
7
3
3
5
4
7
1
3
1
5
5
3
3
3
7
5
7
7
3
3
3
5
5
7
7
2
3
5
3
7
7
3
3
7
5
5
7
9
3
Notes
Good upright habit
Upright compact plants
Oval pod; stringy
Branching plants with spindly stems
Good upright habit
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 5. Field notes from a preliminary bean trial, June 6 planting,
Corvallis, Oregon, 2006 (cont.)
Line
6445
6446
6447
6448
6449
6450
6451
6452
6453
6454
6455
6456
6457
6458
6459
6461
6462
6463
6464
6465
6466
6467
6468
6469
6470
6471
6472
6473
6474
6475
6476
6477
6478
6479
6480
6481
6482
6483
6484
6485
6486
6487
Est.
Sieve
Size
5
5
3
3
3
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4
4-5
5
4-5
4
full
4
4-5
4-5
5
4
full
4
full
4-5
4
full
5
4-5
full
full
full
5
5
4
4-5
full
full
4-5
4-5
Heat Tolez
rance
7
3
4
3
5
1
7
5
7
9
5
7
5
5
5
3
3
1
5
3
3
3
5
5
2
3
3
2
5
5
3
5
5
5
3
5
5
3
5
5
3
5
Notes
Good upright habit
Small plants
Segregating for strings
Heavy foliage
Several sterile plants; segregating flats
Pollywogs
Small plants
Good plant habit
Very indeterminate
Leggy, floppy plants
Heavy foliage
Heavy foliage
Standing well with good pod load
Dense foliage; floppy plant
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 5. Field notes from a preliminary bean trial, June 6 planting,
Corvallis, Oregon, 2006 (cont.)
Line
6488
6489
6490
6491
6492
6493
6494
6496
6497
6498
6499
6500
6501
6502
6503
Savannah
Concesa
Est.
Sieve
Size
full
5
full
4-5
5
5
5
4-5
5
full
full
5
5
full
4-5
4
4
Heat Tolez
rance
1
5
5
2
3
5
5
2
5
5
3
7
5
5
3
5
2
Notes
Very good upright habit
Small plants
z
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 1 = poor tolerance; split set, poor yield,
short and hooked pods, and 9 = excellent heat tolerance.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 6. Performance of preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Percent Sieve Size
Line
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
6137
6175
6189
6239
6284
6290
6300
6313
6338
6436
6437
6438
6439
6440
6443
6445
6446
6459
6463
6467
6469
6471
6474
6475
6477
6478
6479
6480
6481
6484
6485
6489
6490
6492
6493
6494
6497
6498
Days to
Harvest
59
62
62
60
60
60
59
59
63
63
58
59
59
62
59
59
59
59
59
59
63
59
62
60
63
63
64
59
62
63
63
62
62
63
63
59
62
62
62
60
62
63
Est.
Sieve
Size
full
full
full
full
full
5
full
full
full
5
full
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
full
5
full
full
full
5
full
full
full
5
5
full
full
5
full
5
5
5
5
full
Stand
140
128
140
140
140
140
140
133
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
138
137
134
134
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
1
4.6
2.9
1.1
3.2
1.5
13.3
8.1
4.0
1.2
4.0
3.2
4.7
1.6
2.5
4.5
7.5
6.1
3.0
2.7
7.3
4.1
6.3
1.9
25.0
3.6
1.7
2.3
5.0
2.4
1.0
2.6
4.7
2.7
0.0
1.4
3.3
2.5
4.3
4.7
7.1
3.7
2.9
2
5.5
7.1
5.6
4.8
9.2
13.3
11.6
4.0
4.9
5.9
12.7
9.4
8.1
6.8
13.4
11.9
12.2
12.1
9.3
12.2
4.1
12.7
3.8
6.3
6.0
3.4
4.7
13.3
7.1
2.9
6.4
5.9
9.3
2.8
5.6
9.8
6.2
4.3
6.3
5.4
5.6
4.9
3
11.9
15.7
13.3
12.9
16.9
20.0
18.6
16.0
8.5
10.9
20.6
23.4
17.7
16.1
25.4
23.9
22.0
22.7
20.0
22.0
12.2
20.6
7.5
12.5
9.5
10.3
9.3
23.3
5.9
6.7
6.4
9.4
13.3
5.6
5.6
21.3
8.6
10.0
10.9
14.3
9.3
7.8
z
y
4
36.7
42.9
56.7
46.8
38.5
33.3
37.2
36.0
25.6
32.7
39.7
43.8
38.7
41.5
44.8
40.3
42.7
45.5
48.0
43.9
36.7
34.9
30.2
18.8
32.1
25.9
26.7
40.0
34.1
33.7
33.3
43.5
42.7
33.3
26.8
52.5
35.8
45.7
34.4
46.4
35.2
30.1
5
34.9
30.0
22.2
27.4
30.8
16.7
20.9
32.0
47.6
39.6
20.6
15.6
27.4
30.5
10.4
14.9
15.9
13.6
18.7
13.4
40.8
22.2
43.4
31.3
46.4
56.9
40.7
16.7
47.1
51.0
47.4
35.3
32.0
55.6
56.3
13.1
45.7
34.3
42.2
26.8
42.6
47.6
6
6.4
1.4
1.1
4.8
3.1
3.3
3.5
8.0
12.2
6.9
3.2
3.1
6.5
2.5
1.5
1.5
1.2
3.0
1.3
1.2
2.0
3.2
13.2
6.3
2.4
1.7
16.3
1.7
3.5
4.8
3.8
1.2
0.0
2.8
4.2
0.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.0
3.7
6.8
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
%1-4
Sieve
58.7
68.6
76.7
67.7
66.2
80.0
75.6
60.0
40.2
53.5
76.2
81.3
66.1
66.9
88.1
83.6
82.9
83.3
80.0
85.4
57.1
74.6
43.4
62.5
51.2
41.4
43.0
81.7
49.4
44.2
48.7
63.5
68.0
41.7
39.4
86.9
53.1
64.3
56.3
73.2
53.7
45.6
Av
Tons/
Acre
10.0
6.6
8.3
5.9
6.2
2.7
8.2
2.3
7.3
9.3
5.6
5.8
5.7
10.7
6.4
6.1
7.6
6.4
7.1
7.5
4.4
5.9
4.9
1.5
7.6
5.4
8.2
5.1
8.0
9.2
7.2
7.9
6.7
7.3
7.0
5.7
7.3
6.9
6.3
5.3
5.4
9.6
Av Adj
Tons/
x
Acre
10.9
7.9
10.5
7.0
7.2
3.5
10.3
2.5
6.6
9.7
7.0
7.6
6.6
12.5
8.8
8.2
10.1
8.4
9.3
10.1
4.7
7.4
4.5
1.7
7.6
4.9
7.6
6.8
7.9
8.7
7.1
9.0
7.9
6.7
6.3
7.7
7.5
7.8
6.6
6.5
5.6
9.2
Table 6. Performance of preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
Percent Sieve Size
Line
6499
6500
6501
6502
LSD@5%
Days to
Harvest
63
60
60
63
Est.
Sieve
Size
full
5
5
full
Stand
140
140
140
140
1
1.5
2.9
6.5
2.9
2
4.5
7.2
9.7
3.9
3
7.6
13.0
11.3
7.8
z
y
4
31.8
49.3
50.0
31.1
5
50.0
26.1
22.6
46.6
z
6
4.5
1.4
0.0
7.8
%1-4
Sieve
45.5
72.5
77.4
45.6
Mean of 2 replications; subplots of 5' were harvested from single 20' plots in rows 30" apart.
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
x
Tons/Acre adjusted to 50% 1-4 sieve.
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Av
Tons/
Acre
6.1
6.6
5.8
9.5
2.3
Av Adj
Tons/
x
Acre
5.8
8.1
7.4
9.1
2.4
z
Table 7. Performance of preliminary small sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Percent Sieve Size
Line
5613
6174
6256
6267
6268
6312-1
6312-11
6312-18
6312-20
6318
6323
6329
6340
6346
6375
6393
6404
6434
6441
6442
6444
6447
6448
6449
6450
6451
6452
6453
6454
6455
6456
6457
6458
6461
6462
6464
6465
6466
6468
6470
6472
Days to
Harvest
60
62
60
58
62
59
59
58
58
58
59
57
59
58
59
59
58
59
58
58
58
60
60
59
63
58
57
59
59
62
58
62
63
62
62
59
63
62
60
59
60
Est.
Sieve
Size
3
4-5
4
4-5
4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4-5
4
4
4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
3
3
3
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4-5
Stand
140
140
135
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
136
140
136
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
134
140
124
140
140
118
135
140
140
140
140
140
116
140
140
140
140
1
11.9
3.4
6.3
16.1
5.6
5.2
1.3
2.4
4.5
5.4
5.1
8.1
4.2
2.0
8.9
13.2
5.0
9.1
11.1
6.5
4.3
19.5
18.9
12.5
7.4
10.0
7.0
3.3
5.2
9.1
4.6
7.7
1.9
5.6
4.7
1.9
4.1
2.3
6.3
6.5
6.8
2
28.6
6.9
18.8
16.1
19.4
11.7
8.0
11.0
14.9
12.5
23.1
21.6
8.3
6.1
15.6
15.8
10.0
18.2
15.9
19.5
15.2
24.4
37.8
31.3
14.8
13.3
8.8
6.6
8.6
12.1
12.3
11.5
3.8
5.6
7.0
17.0
10.2
4.5
16.7
10.9
10.2
3
47.6
13.8
31.3
16.1
30.6
23.4
24.0
20.7
26.9
21.4
23.1
29.7
22.2
22.4
26.7
28.9
15.0
29.5
25.4
22.1
21.7
39.0
32.4
31.3
18.5
23.3
19.3
19.7
27.6
18.2
24.6
25.0
22.6
11.1
20.9
30.2
16.3
15.9
25.0
19.6
22.0
y
4
11.9
48.3
37.5
29.0
27.8
45.5
46.7
46.3
43.3
44.6
37.2
32.4
48.6
53.1
40.0
34.2
40.0
34.1
36.5
40.3
47.8
17.1
10.8
12.5
33.3
36.7
42.1
47.5
50.0
39.4
49.2
50.0
60.4
55.6
62.8
43.4
40.8
54.5
43.8
47.8
47.5
5
0.0
25.9
6.3
19.4
16.7
14.3
18.7
18.3
10.4
14.3
11.5
8.1
16.7
16.3
8.9
7.9
30.0
9.1
11.1
10.4
10.9
0.0
0.0
12.5
24.1
16.7
21.1
21.3
8.6
21.2
9.2
5.8
11.3
22.2
4.7
5.7
24.5
22.7
8.3
15.2
13.6
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
6
0.0
1.7
0.0
3.2
0.0
0.0
1.3
1.2
0.0
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
1.8
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
4.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
%1-4
sieve
100.0
72.4
93.8
77.4
83.3
85.7
80.0
80.5
89.6
83.9
88.5
91.9
83.3
83.7
91.1
92.1
70.0
90.9
88.9
88.3
89.1
100.0
100.0
87.5
74.1
83.3
77.2
77.0
91.4
78.8
90.8
94.2
88.7
77.8
95.3
92.5
71.4
77.3
91.7
84.8
86.4
Av
tons/acre
4.2
5.7
2.9
2.9
3.3
7.2
7.0
7.2
6.3
5.2
6.4
3.7
6.6
4.5
4.2
3.7
2.2
4.2
6.0
6.6
4.7
4.0
3.6
3.0
5.0
3.2
5.0
5.7
5.6
3.4
5.8
5.1
5.4
3.4
4.3
4.9
4.4
4.4
4.2
4.2
5.7
Table 7. Performance of preliminary small sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006
z
(cont.)
Percent Sieve Size
Line
6473
6476
6482
6483
6486
6487
6491
6496
6503
Savannah
Concesa
LSD@5%
Days to
Harvest
59
62
65
57
59
58
60
59
59
59
63
Est.
Sieve
Size
4
4-5
4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4
Stand
134
140
129
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
1
6.5
1.8
2.6
2.8
5.3
3.4
5.8
4.1
5.7
11.1
0.0
2
10.9
7.0
10.3
11.1
12.3
11.9
7.2
10.2
7.5
22.2
4.2
3
28.3
12.3
25.6
22.2
19.3
25.4
14.5
26.5
24.5
25.9
16.7
y
4
43.5
45.6
53.8
30.6
50.9
42.4
47.8
49.0
47.2
37.0
70.8
5
8.7
31.6
7.7
25.0
12.3
15.3
24.6
10.2
15.1
3.7
8.3
z
6
2.2
1.8
0.0
8.3
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
%1-4
sieve
89.1
66.7
92.3
66.7
87.7
83.1
75.4
89.8
84.9
96.3
91.7
Mean of 2 replications; subplots of 5' were harvested from single 20' plots in rows 30" apart.
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Av
tons/acre
4.4
5.7
3.8
3.6
5.4
5.7
6.4
4.4
5.0
2.5
2.4
2.4
Table 8. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Flavor
v
Line
91G
Pod
Length
(cm)
15.0
Pod
Straightz
ness
3
Pod
Cross
y
Section
round
Pod
Smoothx
ness
5
Pod
w
Color
5
Sweetness
3
Astringency
5
Beaniness
5
Perfuminess
1
OR 54
5630
5669
14.5
15.0
15.0
7
7
6
round
round
round
5
5
6
5
5
6
7
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
5
1
1
1
6137
13.0
5
round
7
8
3
3
5
1
6175
14.0
7
round to
cb
7
7
7
7
7
1
6189
16.0
7
5
7
5
5
7
5
6239
14.0
3
round
round to
cb
3
6
3
9
9
1
6284
13.5
5
5
5
5
7
5
1
6290
13.0
6
round
round to
cb
5
5
5
7
5
1
6300
13.0
5
round
5
5
5
7
5
1
6313
6338
6436
14-16
14.5
13.0
6
7
6
round
round
round
4
7
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
7
5
7
7
5
5
1
1
1
6437
14.5
6
round
7
5
7
7
7
1
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
u
Prime on this date
Getting seedy without sizing up; many short
pods and pollywogs
Not sizing up in this trial
Getting seedy; many blanks and pollywogs
Some seed development; prime in a day or
two
Very nice dark green, dull pods; best blend
of Minuette with BBL type; prime in a
couple days
Looks good; little heat stress; tomorrow
probably optimal; 5 sv just starting to get
seedy; 4 sv not seedy, looks good; 3 sv
good, not junky
Getting seedy; very low yielding, many misshapen and junky pods
Missed by a couple days; segregating for
strings; some fishhooks in 6 sv
Good plant habit and fairly productive but
stringy
Getting seedy without sizing up; many
blanks and misshapen pods
May be a mix of types; all 6 sv are short but
some 5 sv are quite long--may also be heat
stress; all sizes getting seedy
Probably prime tomorrow
Attractive pods; all sv sizes getting seedy
Getting seedy without sizing up; contains
flat off-type
Table 8. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont).
Flavor
v
Line
6438
6439
Pod
Length
(cm)
14.5
15.0
Pod
Straightz
ness
7
5
Pod
Cross
y
Section
round
round
Pod
Smoothx
ness
7
5
Pod
w
Color
5
5
Sweetness
5
5
Astringency
7
7
Beaniness
5
5
Perfuminess
1
1
6440
6443
6445
14.0
13.5
14.5
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
6
6
5
5
6
7
7
7
5
5
5
1
1
1
6446
12.5
4
round
round
round
round to
cb
7
4
7
7
3
1
6459
15.5
7
flat-oval
7
3
5
5
3
1
6463
13.5
4
cb
4
3
7
7
3
7
6467
14.0
3
5
5
7
7
5
1
6469
6471
12.0
12.5
5
6
round
round to
cb
round
7
7
5
5
5
7
7
7
5
5
1
3
6474
14.0
6
round
5
6
5
7
5
1
6475
6477
14.5
14.5
5
7
5
7
5
5
5
5
7
7
5
7
1
1
6478
15.5
5
heart
round
round to
cb
5
5
7
7
5
1
6479
14.5
5
7
6
5
7
7
1
6480
14.5
7
round
round to
cb
Missed by a day or two; attractive pods
Attractive dark green, long, straight pods;
prime
7
5
5
7
5
1
Very seedy in larger sv sizes
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Notes
Getting seedy without sizing up
Getting seedy without sizing up
Getting seedy without sizing up; some
blanking
Getting seedy without sizing up
Very attractive pods
Seedy in all sieve sizes; many curved pods.
Mix of flat, oval and some round in all sieve
sizes; discard
Color too light; curved pods; missed by a
day or two
Extremely bad split set with misshapen
pods, blanks and pollywogs
Prime on this date; attractive pod but short
Missed by a day or two
Nice pods similar to 91G; missed by a day
or two
Strong reverse curve; getting seedy without
sizing up
Attractive pods; prime yesterday
Table 8. Notes on preliminary full sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont).
Flavor
v
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
y
Section
Pod
Smoothx
ness
Pod
w
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
6481
6484
6485
13.5
14.0
14.5
5
7
5
round
cb
round
7
7
5
4
4
4
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
1
1
1
6489
6490
13.0
13.5
4
5
round
round
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
5
5
1
1
6492
6493
6494
6497
6498
12.5
14.5
11.0
14.0
14.0
7
6
7
6
5
round
round
round
round
round
5
7
7
5
7
5
5
5
5
6
3
7
7
7
5
5
5
7
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
6499
6500
13.5
14.5
5
6
round
round
5
5
5
5
7
3
7
7
5
5
1
1
6501
6502
13.5
13.0
6
7
round
round
7
7
5
4
7
7
7
7
5
5
1
1
z
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest
Cross section: cb = crease-back
x
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest
w
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest
v
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 strongest
u
BBL=bush blue lake; sv=sieve
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Notes
Getting seedy without sizing up; some short
pods and blanks
Attractive pods; prime yesterday
Seedy in all sv sizes; many junky pods
Getting seedy without sizing up; many short
junky pods
Prime; attractive pods
Short pods; getting very seedy; 3 sv short
and junky
Prime
Getting seedy without sizing up
Some short pods and blanks
Attractive pods, productive
Missed; many short and junky pods; seedy
in all sv sizes
Segregating for strings
Getting seedy without sizing up; short junky
pods especially in smaller sv sizes
Prime; attractive pods
Table 9. Notes on preliminary small sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Flavor
v
Line
5613
6174
Pod
Length
(cm)
10.5
14.0
Pod
Straightz
ness
7
5
Pod
Cross
y
Section
round
round
Pod
Smoothx
ness
7
7
Pod
w
Color
5
7
Sweetness
7
7
Astringency
7
7
Beaniness
3
3
Perfuminess
1
7
6256
14.5
8
round
9
3
7
5
5
1
6267
6268
6312-1
10.5
12.5
14.0
7
8
6
round
round
round
5
7
7
4
4
5
3
1
7
5
5
7
7
5
5
1
1
1
6312-11
6312-18
14.0
13.5
6
7
7
7
7
6
7
7
3
7
5
5
7
1
6312-20
6318
14.0
14.5
7
6
round
round
heart to
round
round
7
5
6
5
7
7
7
9
5
5
1
1
6323
6329
6340
6346
6375
13.0
13.0
12.5
14.0
12.5
6
8
7
3
5
round
round
round
cb
round
5
7
7
3
7
5
6
5
5
5
7
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
6393
6404
6434
6441
6442
12.0
13.0
13.5
15.0
14.0
6
7
5
5
7
round
round
round
round
round
7
7
5
7
7
5
3
4
5
5
3
5
5
7
5
7
9
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Notes
Prime on this date
Prime on this date
Smooth straight pods but high fiber; color
too light; segregating strings
Short pods in 4-5 sv; prime on this date;
strings
Prime on this date
Seed developing in 4 & 5 sv pods
Contains a smaller sv, shorter, lighter colored mix; prime in a day or two
Attractive pods; prime in a day or two
Seems to be getting seedy without sizing
up; seeds developing in 4 and 5 sv
Seedy in 5 sv; 4 sv OK
Seems to be getting seedy without sizing
up; seeds developing in 4 and 5 sv; 3 sv
short and junky
Prime on this date
Short, junky pods
Short, junky pods, especially in 3 sv
Prime on this date
Contains a longer pod mix and a shiny
mix; probably prime tomorrow; 3 sv getting
short and junky
Shiny short pods; prime today
Early; probably prime in a couple of days
Early; probably prime in a couple of days
Early; probably prime in a couple of days
Table 9. Notes on preliminary small sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont).
Flavor
v
Line
6444
6447
6448
Pod
Length
(cm)
13.0
11.0
11.0
Pod
Straightz
ness
7
9
7
Pod
Cross
y
Section
round
heart
round
Pod
Smoothx
ness
5
9
7
Pod
w
Color
5
5
5
Sweetness
7
7
3
Astringency
7
7
7
Beaniness
7
7
7
Perfuminess
1
1
1
6449
13.0
7
round
7
5
3
7
7
1
6450
13.0
5
round
7
5
7
7
3
7
6451
6452
6453
6454
13.5
14.0
15.0
15.0
5
7
6
6
round
cb
round
round
5
6
7
7
3
5
3
6
5
7
1
5
7
7
3
7
7
5
5
7
1
1
1
1
6455
6456
6457
13-16
14.0
11.0
6
6
3
round
round
round
6
7
5
4
6
3
7
3
7
7
7
7
3
5
5
1
1
1
6458
6461
13.0
14.5
7
3
oval to
round
round
7
7
4
3
7
7
7
7
3
5
1
1
6462
6464
15.0
12.0
7
6
7
5
3
6
5
7
7
7
3
7
1
1
Notes
Early; probably prime in a couple of days
Very attractive 3 sv bean; prime today
Prime on this date
Prime today; produces more 4 and 5 sv
than most 3 sv beans
Pods have slight but consistent positive
curve; prime today
Seems to be predominately early light colored short pod type with mix of later darker colored type
Attractive pods; prime today
Color too light; segregating strings
Getting seedy without sizing up
Mix of long (16cm) and short (13 cm)
pods; long beans seem more desirable
and prime maturity; short beans are over
mature
Attractive pod; probably prime tomorrow
Probably prime tomorrow
Segregating oval and round, which affected the grading; round pods probably
prime
Pod color too light; pods too curved
Getting seedy without sizing up; many 3
and 4 sv short and junky
Getting seedy without sizing up
6465
6466
13.0
11.0
3
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
5
1
5
Somewhat short & curved; prime today
Prime on this date
round
round
round to
cb
round
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Table 9. Notes on preliminary small sieve green bean lines, June 6 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont).
Flavor
v
Line
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
y
Section
Pod
Smoothx
ness
Pod
w
Color
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
6468
6470
6472
6473
6476
6482
13.5
14.0
13.5
13.0
12.5
12.0
9
6
3
6
7
5
round
round
round
round
round
round
9
5
5
7
7
7
4
6
5
6
4
6
7
5
5
7
7
5
7
7
7
5
7
7
5
5
7
7
5
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
6483
9.5
7
round
7
4
7
7
5
1
6486
6487
6491
6496
6503
13.5
14.0
12.0
13.0
13.0
8
5
7
5
7
round
round
round
round
round
7
5
7
7
7
6
5
5
5
5
3
7
5
7
5
3
7
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
Savannah
12.5
8
round
9
7
5
7
1
1
Concesa
12.5
3
round
7
9
5
7
3
3
y
Cross section: cb = crease-back
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest
w
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest
v
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 strongest
u
sv=sieve
x
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Notes
Very attractive pods but too color light;
probably prime in a couple of days
Prime on this date
Getting seedy without sizing up
Small seeds but large seed cavities
Probably prime yesterday
Prime tomorrow
Short junky pods with some blanking especially in 3 and 4 sv
Uniform, smooth, straight pods; probably
prime tomorrow
Prime on this date
Short junky pods
Many short junky pods
Probably prime tomorrow
Shiny dark green, smooth pods; getting
seedy without sizing up
Very dark green shiny pods; many fishhooks; very dark green seeds
Table 10. Performance of commercial green bean varieties, June 21 planting, Corvallis, 2006.
Percent Sieve Size
Variety
91G
Source
OSU
AV
Stand
150
Intended
Use
full sieve
OR 54
OSU
150
full sieve
5630
OSU
150
full sieve
5669
OSU
150
full sieve
6137
OSU
150
full sieve
6185
OSU
150
full sieve
6189
OSU
150
full sieve
6230
OSU
148
full sieve
SB 4285
Syngenta
150
full sieve
BB 519
Pannar
146
5
Days
59
61
61
63
65
59
61
63
59
61
63
61
63
65
59
61
63
59
61
63
58
61
61
63
65
65
68
70
1
4.6
5.9
3.4
2.2
1.5
4.5
4.3
3.0
3.8
1.9
1.7
4.7
2.7
1.0
6.5
2.3
1.5
7.6
2.4
2.3
6.4
2.1
6.0
4.7
3.1
5.3
4.7
3.6
2
6.7
3.7
8.4
4.3
3.1
6.9
4.3
3.0
9.2
5.8
2.3
11.0
6.3
3.0
10.3
6.0
3.1
11.4
5.2
3.2
9.2
3.5
8.7
6.1
4.0
10.0
8.9
9.0
3
12.6
6.3
21.1
11.6
6.8
14.6
10.4
5.7
21.7
14.3
6.9
19.2
11.8
5.6
20.5
10.6
5.4
17.3
12.8
9.4
14.7
6.3
18.5
11.4
8.0
23.4
22.6
16.6
4
31.5
26.8
39.8
37.0
24.1
42.1
38.9
27.5
40.0
40.9
28.4
39.2
34.9
19.5
30.3
29.2
13.8
36.3
32.0
22.4
31.2
22.4
40.8
34.3
23.8
40.7
45.1
40.8
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
5
38.7
43.1
24.9
36.2
47.4
31.2
39.3
49.7
24.6
33.2
47.2
22.4
38.0
45.2
25.9
35.2
35.6
24.1
38.0
39.9
31.2
40.6
24.2
38.4
51.7
18.2
17.0
26.0
z
Tons/Acre Sieve Size
6
5.9
14.1
2.3
8.7
17.0
0.8
2.9
11.1
0.8
3.9
13.5
3.5
6.3
25.7
6.5
16.7
40.6
3.4
9.6
22.7
7.3
25.2
1.9
5.1
9.3
2.4
1.7
4.0
1-4
55.5
42.8
72.8
55.1
35.6
68.0
57.9
39.3
74.6
62.9
39.3
74.1
55.7
29.0
67.6
48.1
23.8
72.6
52.4
37.3
61.5
34.3
74.0
56.6
39.0
79.4
81.3
70.0
1
0.48
0.70
0.39
0.26
0.22
0.48
0.52
0.39
0.39
0.22
0.22
0.52
0.30
0.13
0.52
0.22
0.17
0.78
0.26
0.30
0.30
0.13
0.70
0.61
0.44
0.48
0.48
0.44
2
0.70
0.44
0.96
0.52
0.44
0.74
0.52
0.39
0.96
0.65
0.30
1.22
0.70
0.39
0.83
0.57
0.35
1.17
0.57
0.44
0.44
0.22
1.00
0.78
0.57
0.91
0.91
1.09
3
1.31
0.74
2.39
1.39
0.96
1.57
1.26
0.74
2.26
1.61
0.91
2.13
1.31
0.74
1.65
1.00
0.61
1.78
1.39
1.26
0.70
0.39
2.13
1.48
1.13
2.13
2.31
2.00
4
3.26
3.13
4.52
4.44
3.39
4.52
4.74
3.57
4.18
4.61
3.74
4.35
3.87
2.57
2.44
2.74
1.57
3.74
3.48
3.00
1.48
1.39
4.70
4.44
3.35
3.70
4.61
4.92
5
4.00
5.05
2.83
4.35
6.66
3.35
4.79
6.44
2.57
3.74
6.22
2.48
4.22
5.96
2.09
3.31
4.05
2.48
4.13
5.35
1.48
2.52
2.78
4.96
7.26
1.65
1.74
3.13
6
0.61
1.65
0.26
1.04
2.39
0.09
0.35
1.44
0.09
0.44
1.78
0.39
0.70
3.39
0.52
1.57
4.61
0.35
1.04
3.05
0.35
1.57
0.22
0.65
1.31
0.22
0.17
0.48
Graded
y
Total
10.35
11.70
11.35
12.01
14.05
10.74
12.18
12.96
10.44
11.27
13.18
11.09
11.09
13.18
8.05
9.40
11.35
10.31
10.88
13.40
4.74
6.22
11.53
12.92
14.05
9.09
10.22
12.05
x
$/Acre
897*
902
1131
1036*
1007
1032
1077*
965
1054
1039*
981
1116
962*
880
770
762*
713
1025
917*
978
432*
440
1158
1129*
1043
951
1083*
1175
Table 10. Performance of commercial green bean varieties, June 21 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.).
Percent Sieve Size
Variety
BSC 864
Source
Brotherton
AV
Stand
150
Concesa
Harris Moran
150
Savannah
Harris Moran
BB 2200
Intended
Use
4-5
z
Tons/Acre Sieve Size
Days
61
63
65
1
7.7
4.8
5.2
2
18.6
11.4
7.8
3
24.4
18.0
13.0
4
38.5
38.9
35.4
5
10.9
26.3
34.9
6
0.0
0.6
3.6
1-4
89.1
73.1
61.5
1
0.52
0.35
0.44
2
1.26
0.83
0.65
3
1.65
1.31
1.09
4
2.61
2.83
2.96
5
0.74
1.91
2.91
6
0.00
0.04
0.30
Graded
y
Total
6.79
7.26
8.35
$/Acre
649
569
570*
4
62
64
66
7.8
4.4
3.6
27.5
14.3
8.9
49.2
40.4
33.3
15.5
40.4
53.3
0.0
0.5
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
99.5
99.1
0.65
0.39
0.35
2.31
1.26
0.87
4.13
3.57
3.26
1.31
3.57
5.22
0.00
0.04
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.40
8.83
9.79
1019
931*
949
150
4
Pureline
150
4
BB 420
Starke
Ayres
145
4
BB 513
Starke
Ayres
150
4
BB 514
Starke
Ayres
150
4
BB 520
Starke
Ayres
150
4
GB 87
Pureline
150
3-4
61
63
65
64
66
68
64
66
70
64
66
68
63
65
68
63
65
68
57
59
62
5.9
2.8
1.9
10.6
10.2
8.9
12.7
11.6
4.9
11.0
7.0
8.4
10.3
8.0
8.4
9.0
5.5
6.1
19.4
7.9
5.3
23.4
12.6
6.7
20.6
20.5
18.8
17.6
16.5
8.6
18.5
16.4
17.3
17.7
16.6
15.6
15.0
12.3
11.7
45.2
25.7
14.9
41.5
39.7
30.2
36.9
38.6
38.6
28.4
24.8
15.6
38.2
30.3
31.4
35.4
28.6
27.6
30.8
25.3
26.9
32.3
46.4
39.9
27.3
42.1
52.6
28.4
27.1
30.2
37.3
39.7
49.8
30.1
42.8
40.3
34.3
42.2
42.5
38.3
49.3
42.6
3.2
20.0
38.3
2.0
2.8
8.6
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.9
7.4
18.9
2.3
3.5
2.6
2.3
4.5
5.8
6.8
7.5
11.2
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
98.0
97.2
91.4
96.5
96.4
96.5
96.1
92.6
79.0
97.7
96.5
97.4
97.7
95.5
94.2
93.2
92.5
87.3
100.0
100.0
98.4
0.52
0.26
0.22
0.65
0.74
0.78
0.57
0.61
0.52
0.83
0.61
0.70
0.78
0.70
1.00
0.52
0.35
0.52
0.78
0.48
0.44
2.09
1.17
0.78
1.26
1.48
1.65
0.78
0.87
0.91
1.39
1.44
1.44
1.35
1.44
1.87
0.87
0.78
1.00
1.83
1.57
1.22
3.70
3.70
3.52
2.26
2.78
3.39
1.26
1.31
1.65
2.87
2.65
2.61
2.70
2.48
3.31
1.78
1.61
2.31
1.31
2.83
3.26
2.44
3.92
6.13
1.74
1.96
2.65
1.65
2.09
5.26
2.26
3.74
3.35
2.61
3.65
5.09
2.22
3.13
3.65
0.13
1.22
3.13
0.17
0.26
1.00
0.22
0.26
0.30
0.17
0.39
2.00
0.17
0.30
0.22
0.17
0.39
0.70
0.39
0.48
0.96
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.92
9.31
11.66
6.13
7.22
8.79
4.44
5.26
10.57
7.53
8.74
8.31
7.61
8.66
11.96
5.79
6.35
8.57
4.05
6.09
8.18
999
949*
1041
673
797*
954
460
519*
823
827
881*
858
817
866*
1178
579
587*
781
522
722*
863
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
x
Table 10. Performance of commercial green bean varieties, June 21 planting, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.).
Percent Sieve Size
Variety
Trofeo
Source
Pureline
AV
Stand
150
Intended
Use
3
Ducato
Brotherton
150
3
Medinah
Syngenta
150
2-3
Stayton
Syngenta
150
2-3
Baccara
Pureline
150
2
Days
63
65
68
61
63
65
61
63
65
56
58
61
59
62
64
1
15.2
13.1
11.3
7.7
4.3
2.3
11.8
5.3
4.1
31.6
18.5
11.4
50.4
32.6
21.5
2
41.8
32.4
33.3
24.7
15.5
10.8
62.5
34.9
25.4
67.4
69.4
57.1
49.6
66.9
75.9
3
38.0
46.6
45.5
48.9
48.1
45.1
25.7
57.4
64.8
1.1
12.1
31.5
0.0
0.6
2.6
4
5.1
8.0
10.0
18.7
31.6
40.8
0.0
2.4
5.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
z
Tons/Acre Sieve Size
6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1-4
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
99.5
99.1
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
1
1.04
1.00
1.13
0.61
0.35
0.22
0.78
0.39
0.35
1.31
1.00
0.91
2.57
2.44
1.78
2
2.87
2.48
3.35
1.96
1.26
1.00
4.13
2.57
2.13
2.78
3.74
4.57
2.52
5.00
6.31
3
2.61
3.57
4.57
3.87
3.92
4.18
1.70
4.22
5.44
0.04
0.65
2.52
0.00
0.04
0.22
4
0.35
0.61
1.00
1.48
2.57
3.78
0.00
0.17
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Graded
y
Total
6.87
7.66
10.05
7.92
8.13
9.27
6.61
7.35
8.40
4.13
5.39
8.00
5.09
7.48
8.31
z
Percent calculated as % of total of 1-6 sieve beans.
y
Total tons/acre of the graded beans, including sieve sizes 1-6. Values will be lower than those reported in Table 11 because some beans are lost in the grading
process. Analysis of variance (Table 11) was calculated using the harvest marked with *.
x
$/acre for full sieve and 5 sieve beans based on $120/ton for 1-4 sieve and $45/ton for 5-6 sieve; for 3, 4, and 4-5 sieve beans based on $131/ton for 1-3 sieve,
$69/ton for 4 sieve and $25/ton for 5-6 sieve; and for 2-3 and 2 sieve beans based on $143/ton for 1-2 sieve and $0/ton for 3-6 sieve.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
x
$/Acre
879
965*
1254
945
902*
970
703*
423
355
585
678*
784
728
1064*
1157
Table 11. Statistical comparison of yields and dollar return of commercial green bean
z
lines, Corvallis, 2006 .
Line
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
6137
6185
6189
6230
SB 4285
BB 519
BSC 864
Concesa
Savannah
BB 2200
BB 420
BB 513
BB 514
BB 520
GB 87
Trofeo
Ducato
Medinah
Stayton
Baccara
LSD @ 5%
Intended Use
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
5 sieve
4-5 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
3 sieve
3 sieve
3 sieve
2-3 sieve
2-3 sieve
2 sieve
T/A Unadjusted
11.1
12.5
13.2
12.0
11.7
9.9
11.3
5.4
13.6
12.8
9.0
9.3
10.0
7.5
5.9
9.0
9.3
6.7
6.5
8.0
8.5
7.0
5.6
7.8
1.7
z
T/A Adjusted
11.8
13.1
14.2
13.6
12.4
9.7
11.5
6.0
14.6
15.4
9.0
9.3
10.0
7.5
5.9
9.0
9.3
6.7
6.5
8.0
8.5
7.0
5.6
7.8
1.7
y
$/A
964
1077
1165
1107
1015
804
953
487
1190
1252
820
1108
1180
878
672
1052
1086
771
783
960
1015
835
673
934
174
Based on one selected harvest for each variety (marked with * on Table 10), which was the
harvest closest to optimal based on that variety's intended use (50% 1-4 sieve for full sieve).
Yields are field yields of 1-6 sieve beans.
y
Full sieve and 5 sieve beans were adjusted to 50% 1-4 sieve; all others were unadjusted.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 12. Notes on June 21 commercial bean trial, Corvallis, Oregon, 2006.
Flavor
Line
91G
OR54
5630
5669
Pod
Length
(cm)
16.0
16.0
15.5
15.0
Pod
Straightz
ness
5
7
5
5
Pod
Cross
y
Section
round
round
round
round
Pod
Smoothx
ness
5
6
5
5
Pod
w
Color
5
6
6
6
Sweetness
7
5
7
7
Astringency
7
7
7
7
v
Beaniness
5
5
5
7
Perfuminess
1
1
1
1
6137
17.0
5
round
5
8
3
7
5
1
6185
16.0
6
round
7
7
3
5
7
1
6189
15.5
6
round
5
6
5
7
5
3
6230
15.0
3
round
3
4
5
7
5
1
SB 4285
15.0
6
round
8
4
5
5
7
1
BB 519
15.5
8
round to
cb
9
5
7
5
5
1
BSC 864
14.5
5
round to
cb
7
5
3
5
3
7
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
u
Very productive in this trial
Very attractive dark green,
long pods; good interior color; seeds very widely spaced
in pod
Long slender dark green
pods with systematic, strong
reverse curve; pods become
shiny in 5 and 6 sv
BBL pods; dull blue-green
color; probably best of Minuette crosses
Low yield; some blanking
and variable pod color but
no strings or high fiber; color
too light
Good BBL type but color
maybe too light; easy to
hand pick
Long straight slender
smooth pods; mix of yellow
green pods and darker
green pods; indeterminate or
split set
Long smooth pods, most
have a reverse curve; some
blonding of shaded pods
Table 12. Notes on June 21 commercial bean trial, Corvallis, Oregon, 2006 (cont.).
Flavor
v
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
y
Section
Pod
Smoothx
ness
Pod Cow
lor
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
Concesa
14.5
7
round
8
7
1
9
7
1
Savannah
14.5
8
round
6
7
5
5
5
1
BB 2200
16.0
7
round
9
5
3
7
5
3
BB 420
14.5
7
round
9
5
3
5
9
1
BB 513
15.5
7
round
7
5
5
7
7
1
BB 514
15.0
8
round
9
4
7
5
7
7
BB 520
14.5
6
9
4
7
5
7
7
GB 87
14.5
8
round
round to
cb
9
4
3
3
7
1
Trofeo
15.0
8
round
9
4
1
3
9
3
Line
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
u
Notes
Shiny dark green smooth
pods; very dark green seed.
Long straight dark green
pods
Long smooth shiny green
pod; many pollywogs in 5 sv
Very indeterminate or split
set; some blond pods from
heavy shading in plots; appears to be segregating for
easy pick trait; may be a mix
of late long podded full sv
and a shorter podded 4 sv
line
Very indeterminate plant;
shiny pods
Long straight, smooth, apple
green pods; tendency to
blond under heavy foliage;
split set
Long slender apple green
pods; some severe blonding
where pods were shaded;
some pods with a severe
bronzing (virus?)
Very long, straight, smooth,
shiny pod ; color too light
Long, slender, smooth, apple green pods
Table 12. Notes on June 21 commercial bean trial, Corvallis, Oregon, 2006 (cont.).
Flavor
v
Pod
Length
(cm)
Pod
Straightz
ness
Pod
Cross
y
Section
Pod
Smoothx
ness
Pod Cow
lor
Sweetness
Astringency
Beaniness
Perfuminess
Ducato
Medinah
13.0
12.5
7
8
round
round
9
7
5
5
5
7
9
7
5
3
1
1
Baccara
12.5
6
round
9
4
5
7
5
1
Line
z
u
Notes
Very smooth apple green
pods; strong reverse curve
Very indeterminate plant;
slow hand picking
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 straightest
Cross section: cb = crease-back
x
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 smoothest
w
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 darkest
v
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 strongest
u
This trial had uniform lush heavy growth with light white mold infection beginning; sv = sieve; BBL = bush blue lake
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 13. White mold incidence in green bean lines, June 21 planting, Corvallis, 2006 .
Line
91G
OR 54
5630
5669
6137
Sieve Size
x
Position in Field
Rep 1
middle
middle
south
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
full sieve
north
north
Rep 6
south
south
south
north
north
Total No.
Plants
Rep
Rep
1
6
32
38
31
37
31
47
47
35
39
49
No. Infected
Rep
Rep
1
6
31
6
27
12
31
15
12
25
6
8
% Infected
Rep
Rep
1
6
97
16
87
32
100
32
26
71
15
16
Average
% Infected
56
60
66
20
44
6185
full sieve
south
south
42
40
25
31
60
78
69
6189
6230
full sieve
full sieve
south
south
middle
north
43
45
45
37
30
32
25
4
70
71
56
11
63
41
SB 4285
BB 519
BSC 864
Concesa
Savannah
BB 2200
full sieve
5 sieve
4-5 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
4 sieve
south
north
middle
middle
north
middle
north
south
middle
middle
south
north
33
36
31
44
31
50
44
40
45
36
45
41
25
7
13
37
22
27
1
9
0
1
13
0
76
19
42
84
71
54
2
23
0
3
29
0
39
21
21
43
50
27
BB 420
4 sieve
north
north
33
51
12
10
36
20
28
BB 513
4 sieve
middle
middle
22
45
3
3
14
7
10
BB 514
BB 520
4 sieve
4 sieve
middle
north
north
south
41
52
43
39
16
13
0
4
39
25
0
10
20
18
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
Very leggy floppy plant
Very leggy floppy plant
% infected may be misleading (low) because both plots
were on the north side of
field
Somewhat leggy and floppy
habit with white mold developing
Retains compact habit in
field even under high productivity situations
Large leaved, floppy habit
Retains compact habit in
field even under high productivity situations
Very indeterminate with
heavy foliage
Very indeterminate with
heavy foliage
Very indeterminate with
heavy foliage
z
Table 13. White mold incidence in green bean lines, June 21 planting, Corvallis, 2006 .
Line
GB 87
Trofeo
Ducato
Medinah
Stayton
Baccara
Sieve Size
3 sieve
3 sieve
3 sieve
2-3 sieve
2-3 sieve
2 sieve
Position in Field
Rep 1
south
north
south
south
north
middle
x
Rep 6
middle
south
north
middle
middle
middle
Total No.
Plants
Rep
Rep
1
6
41
48
52
48
38
37
43
50
49
45
40
40
No. Infected
Rep
Rep
1
6
20
2
41
45
21
1
6
6
28
0
32
4
z
% Infected
Rep
Rep
1
6
49
4
79
94
55
3
14
12
57
0
80
10
Average
% Infected
26
86
29
13
29
45
Notes
Very indeterminate
Counts were taken after harvest of the entire trial was completed and based on a 5' plot each from the first and sixth reps.
Plots on south side of field were more heavily infected due to extra water from a young broccoli planting. The east end of the field (rep 1)
was also generally more heavily infected than the west end (rep 6).
x
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006
z
y
Line
Rep
1
Score
Rep
2
Average
x
Habit
B7732-1
B7732-3
5
7
6
5
5.5
6.0
I
I
B7732-15
B7732-16
B7732-19
6
5
7
5
7
5
5.5
6.0
6.0
I
I
I
B7732-24
6
6
6.0
I
B7732-26
B7732-27
8
6
6
7
7.0
6.5
I
I
B7732-35
6
6
6.0
I
B7732-41
6
7
6.5
I
B7732-42
5
7
6.0
I
B7733-6
6
4
5.0
I
B7733-8
6
8
7.0
I
B7733-11
5
7
6.0
I
B7733-21
B7733-25
B7733-26
B7733-29
5
4
6
4
7
7
7
6
6.0
5.5
6.5
5.0
I
I
I
I
B7733-30
B7733-32
B7733-34
7
7
7
8
6
7
7.5
6.5
7.0
I
I
I
Pod Fiber
med to
high
medium
med to
high
medium
medium
med to
high
med to
high
medium
med to
high
med to
high
low to
med
low to
med
med to
high
med to
high
low to
med
medium
medium
medium
med to
high
medium
medium
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
short, curved pods; late
strings
strings
short, very curved pods;
low yield
strings
strings
strings
late, low yield, strings
early, good yield, nice
pods, no strings
strings
strings
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
z
y
Line
Rep
1
Score
Rep
2
Average
x
Habit
B7733-35
B7733-36
B7734-6
B7734-7
B7734-23
5
4
5
5
4
4
3
5
4
6
4.5
3.5
5.0
4.5
5.0
I
I
I
I
I
B7734-24
6
7
6.5
I
B7734-27
B7734-29
B7734-31
6
6
5
5
6
6
5.5
6.0
5.5
I
I
I
B7734-36
B7734-37
B7734-39
B7734-45
B7734-46
4
5
6
6
4
6
6
4
5
4
5.0
5.5
5.0
5.5
4.0
I
I
I
I
I
B7734-47
B7735-2
7
5
5
6
6.0
5.5
I
I
B7735-9
B7735-11
B7735-12
B7735-13
B7735-17
B7735-18
B7735-19
6
6
6
7
5
5
4
3
4
5
7
7
6
5
4.5
5.0
5.5
7.0
6.0
5.5
4.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B7735-20
B7735-23
6
6
7
5
6.5
5.5
I
I
Pod Fiber
med to
high
medium
high
high
high
med to
high
high
high
medium
med to
high
high
medium
medium
medium
med to
high
medium
med to
high
medium
medium
high
high
medium
medium
med to
high
medium
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
strings
strings
strings
short curved pods;
strings
strings
very short curved pods
strings
very short pods; strings
very short pods; strings
strings
strings
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
z
y
Score
Rep
2
Average
4
5.0
Line
B7735-24
Rep
1
6
B7735-30
B7735-32
B7735-36
6
6
6
6
5
8
6.0
5.5
7.0
I
I
I
B7735-39
6
6
6.0
I
B7735-41
6
6
6.0
I
B7735-43
5
7
6.0
I
B7735-47
4
5
4.5
I
B7735-48
B7735-51
B7735-53
B7735-57
B7735-59
B7735-61
7
8
6
6
5
4
6
8
6
6
8
4
6.5
8.0
6.0
6.0
6.5
4.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
B7735-62
7
8
7.5
I
B7735-65
7
5
6.0
I
B7735-66
B7735-67
5
6
6
6
5.5
6.0
I
I
B7735-68
B7735-69
B7735-70
5
4
6
6
7
6
5.5
5.5
6.0
I
I
I
Pod Fiber
medium
med to
high
medium
medium
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
medium
med to
high
high
medium
B7735-72
6
5
5.5
I
med
x
Habit
I
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
strings
strings
strings
short pods, some curved
strings
strings
leaft plants; low yield;
curved pods
strings
very short curved pods;
strings
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
z
y
Line
Rep
1
Score
Rep
2
Average
x
Habit
B7735-73
3
7
5.0
I
B7735-74
6
6
6.0
I
B7735-75
5
8
6.5
I
B7738-2
B7738-3
B7738-4
B7738-5
B7738-9
B7738-10
B7738-12
B7738-20
B7738-22
B7738-29
6
7
7
6
6
7
6
7
6
6
4
4
5
7
6
6
7
4
5
6
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
6.0
6.5
6.5
5.5
5.5
6.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B7738-30
B7738-32
6
7
5
6
5.5
6.5
I
I
B7738-35
B7738-38
B7738-39
5
5
7
7
5
6
6.0
5.0
6.5
I
I
I
B7738-40
5
6
5.5
I
B7738-42
7
6
6.5
I
B7738-45
6
5
5.5
I
B7738-48
B7738-49
5
6
4
6
4.5
6.0
I
I
Pod Fiber
med to
high
med to
high
low to
med
med to
high
high
medium
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
med to
high
high
low to
high
high
high
low to
high
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
medium
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
z
y
Score
Rep
2
Average
6
6.0
Line
B7738-53
Rep
1
6
B7739-8
7
5
6.0
I
B7739-9
B7739-12
6
5
7
6
6.5
5.5
I
I
B7739-14
B7739-16
6
7
6
6
6.0
6.5
I
I
B7739-17
6
6
6.0
I
B7739-19
6
5
5.5
I
B7739-20
B7739-29
6
7
5
5
5.5
6.0
I
I
B7739-30
B7739-32
B7739-40
B7739-45
DM4NY6
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.0
6.0
I
I
I
I
III
DM6NY1
5
6
5.5
I
B7030-24
B7126-33-1-2
B7239-5-4
NY 5517
RR 4270
2
6
7
8
2
1
6
5
7
5
1.5
6.0
6.0
7.5
3.5
I
I
I
I
I
WIS 46 RR
WIS 83 RR
5
2
6
2
5.5
2.0
I
I
x
Habit
I
Pod Fiber
high
med to
high
med to
high
high
medium
medium
med to
high
low to
high
low to
med
medium
med to
high
high
high
high
high
low to
med
med to
high
high
medium
medium
high
med to
high
medium
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
very short curved pods;
strings
strings
strings
very short curved pods
very curved pods
strings
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
z
y
Line
Rep
1
Score
Rep
2
Average
x
Habit
SB 4325
SB 4326
7
6
6
7
6.5
6.5
I
I
GF1
GF4
7
7
7
6
7.0
6.5
I
I
GF5
GF6
GF7
6
7
6
5
6
6
5.5
6.5
6.0
I
I
I
GF8
7
5
6.0
I
GF9
5
5
5.0
I
GF10
4
6
5.0
I
GF11
GF12
GF14
GF16
GF17
5
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
5
5.0
5.5
5.5
6.0
5.5
I
I
I
I
I
GF18
GF19
6
6
6
6
6.0
6.0
I
I
GF20
GF21
6
6
7
6
6.5
6.0
I
I
GF22
5
5
5.0
I
GF24
6
8
7.0
I
Pod Fiber
low to
med
medium
med to
high
medium
med to
high
medium
medium
med to
high
med to
high
low to
med
low to
med
medium
high
high
high
med to
high
medium
med to
high
medium
med to
high
med to
high
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
z
y
Line
Rep
1
Score
Rep
2
Average
x
Habit
GF25
GF26
5
8
5
6
5.0
7.0
I
I
GF27
6
6
6.0
I
GF29
6
7
6.5
I
GF30
6
6
6.0
I
GF31
7
6
6.5
I
GF33
6
6
6.0
I
GF34
GF35
GF38
GF39
GF40
7
7
6
7
8
7
6
6
6
6
7.0
6.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
I
I
I
I
I
GF41
6
6
6.0
I
GF42
GF43
GF44
7
7
7
6
7
6
6.5
7.0
6.5
I
I
I
GF46
GF48
GF50
5
6
7
6
6
6
5.5
6.0
6.5
I
I
I
GW1
5
6
5.5
I
GW2
4
5
4.5
I
Pod Fiber
med to
high
high
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
med to
high
medium
medium
medium
medium
med to
high
med to
high
medium
medium
low to
med
high
high
med to
high
med to
high
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
z
y
Score
Rep
2
Average
5
5.0
Line
GW3
Rep
1
5
GW7
GW9
5
5
5
6
5.0
5.5
I
I
GW11
GW16
GW17
6
5
6
6
4
6
6.0
4.5
6.0
I
I
I
GW20
GW22
GW23
6
7
6
6
7
6
6.0
7.0
6.0
I
I
I
GW25
GW26
GW27
GW29
GW30
5
3
6
5
7
6
4
5
6
6
5.5
3.5
5.5
5.5
6.5
I
I
I
I
I
GW31
7
5
6.0
I
GW32
GW37
GW38
GW42
GW44
GW45
6
5
4
6
5
7
6
6
5
6
3
7
6.0
5.5
4.5
6.0
4.0
7.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW46
GW47
GW48
4
6
7
6
6
6
5.0
6.0
6.5
I
I
I
x
Habit
I
Pod Fiber
high
med to
high
high
med to
high
high
high
med to
high
high
high
med to
high
high
high
medium
high
med to
high
med to
high
high
high
high
high
medium
low to
high
high
medium
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Notes
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
Table 14. Fusarium root rot infection, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
z
y
Line
Rep
1
Score
Rep
2
Average
x
Habit
GW49
GW50
GW53
GW55
GW57
GW58
6
4
6
6
7
6
6
7
6
4
7
6
6.0
5.5
6.0
5.0
7.0
6.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW61
6
8
7.0
I
GW64
5
4
4.5
I
GW67
GW68
7
5
6
6
6.5
5.5
I
I
GW70
GW71
5
5
5
6
5.0
5.5
III
I
GW75
GW77
6
7
6
8
6.0
7.5
I
I
Pod Fiber
med to
high
high
high
high
high
medium
med to
high
med to
high
low to
med
medium
med to
high
medium
low to
med
medium
med to
high
low
high
Notes
strings
strings
strings
strings
strings
GW81
5
4
4.5
I
w
5446
7.0
7.4
7.2
I
w
RR 6950
1.2
1.0
1.1
III
LSD @ 5%
1.8
z
Planted June 27.
y
Scores based on a 1-9 scale, with 1 = very light surface infection and 9 = roots mostly dead and
plants stunted.
x
I = bush habit; III = vine
w
Checks; each rep score is an average of 5 plots.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2006
White Mold Scores
Entry
PI207130-2-4
PI290990-4-1
G122
L192
MO162
NY2-5984-1
NY1-6020-5
NY5972
6229
6231
H9658-9
NY1-6020-4
NYBS6637
FR266
6230
6256
6263
6235
6267
6274
6468
NYBS6643
6239
6453
Medina
6232
6268
Rep 1
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
2
3
5
4
3
5
2
4
4
Rep 2
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
2
3
4
y
Rep 3
1
2
2
2
3
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
Rep 4
4
4
5
4
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
2
4
4
3
5
Average
White
Mold Inciy
dence
1.72
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.50
2.75
2.75
2.75
2.75
3.00
3.00
3.05
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.72
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.99
4.00
4.00
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
G
122
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
MO
162
^
^
^
^
^
^
91G
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Growth
w
Habit
1.6
3.3
3.5
2.3
2.5
2.0
1.5
2.5
1.8
1.5
2.5
1.3
1.6
2.0
2.3
2.8
2.8
1.8
1.5
3.3
3.0
1.8
2.0
2.8
3.0
2.3
2.3
Estimated
v
Yield
3.0
2.5
3.8
3.0
3.3
2.8
3.0
2.8
2.5
3.0
3.3
2.0
2.6
2.5
2.3
2.8
3.5
2.0
2.3
3.3
3.0
2.0
2.3
3.3
3.0
2.8
2.5
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
White Mold Scores
Entry
6457
6448
6260
6262
6461
Savannah
6283
6447
Ex Rico
6287
6288
6462
6475
6483
6259
6290
6300
6458
6258
6280
6312-7
6393
6464
6474
6455
5613
6313
6348
6450
Rep 1
4
5
3
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
4
5
6
5
5
5
6
5
6
5
6
5
5
7
7
6
6
Rep 2
3
3
5
4
5
4
5
5
6
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
6
5
5
6
6
5
5
5
6
y
Rep 3
4
Rep 4
5
4
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
6
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
6
6
5
6
5
5
5
4
4
3
6
4
6
5
5
5
5
4
6
6
6
6
7
4
7
5
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
Average
White
Mold Inciy
dence
4.00
4.06
4.25
4.25
4.25
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.25
5.25
5.25
5.25
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.56
5.75
5.75
5.75
5.75
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
G
122
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
MO
162
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
91G
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Growth
w
Habit
2.5
2.4
3.3
3.0
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.5
1.8
2.0
1.3
2.3
2.0
1.8
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.0
1.8
1.9
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.0
Estimated
v
Yield
2.8
2.4
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.3
2.5
2.5
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.3
2.5
2.0
2.8
2.5
2.3
2.3
3.3
2.3
2.0
2.8
2.5
2.3
2.9
2.8
2.3
2.3
2.5
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
White Mold Scores
Entry
6257
6312-3
6312-8
6329
6338
6438
6439
6441
6443
6444
6459
6470
6500
6175
6436
6174
5630
6284
6312-1
6375
6434
6437
6440
6454
6467
6478
6479
6487
6490
Rep 1
6
7
6
6
7
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
Rep 2
6
6
6
6
7
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
5
7
6
6
6
7
7
6
6
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
y
Rep 4
6
5
5
6
6
7
7
6
5
6
7
7
6
5
Rep 3
6
6
7
6
4
5
6
6
7
6
6
5
7
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
5
5
6
6
7
7
6
7
6
6
6
5
5
7
7
6
7
6
6
6
7
7
7
6
6
7
7
6
7
6
6
6
7
5
Average
White
Mold Inciy
dence
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.04
6.05
6.12
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
G
122
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
MO
162
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
91G
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Growth
w
Habit
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.5
1.1
2.3
1.8
2.0
1.8
2.3
1.8
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.3
1.8
2.3
Estimated
v
Yield
2.8
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.5
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.5
2.1
2.3
1.9
2.3
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.3
2.3
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
White Mold Scores
Entry
6493
6286
6312-4
6312-6
6342
6445
6460
6466
6473
6484
6491
6492
6497
6498
6503
6456
6471
6476
6485
6241
6340
6346
6347
6477
6480
6486
u
91G
6137
Rep 1
7
6
6
6
7
7
7
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
6
6
7
7
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
6
7.8
Rep 2
7
6
7
7
7
6
7
7
6
7
7
6
7
7
6
7
6
6
7
6
7
7
6
8
7
7
6.7
y
Rep 3
6
7
6
7
6
7
5
6
6
6
7
7
5
6
7
Rep 4
5
7
7
6
6
6
7
8
8
7
6
7
7
6
7
8
6
6
7
7
6
7
5.7
7
8
7
7
5
7
7
7.5
7
Average
White
Mold Inciy
dence
6.25
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.50
6.56
6.56
6.56
6.56
6.75
6.75
6.75
6.75
6.75
6.75
6.75
6.83
6.85
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
G
122
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
MO
162
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
91G
Growth
w
Habit
1.8
1.5
1.8
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.5
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.3
1.8
1.1
Estimated
v
Yield
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.5
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.4
1.9
1.9
2.4
1.8
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.3
2.1
2.1
Table 15. Results from a white mold screening trial, Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
White Mold Scores
Entry
OR54
6318
6323
6481
6495
6499
6501
6435
6489
5669
6472
Spinel
Rep 1
6
7
7
7
7
7
6
7
7
8
6
8
y
Rep 2
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Rep 3
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Rep 4
8
7
7
7
7
7
8
7
7
7
7
8
7
8
8
8
9
8
Average
White
Mold Inciy
dence
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.12
7.38
7.50
7.50
7.75
z
White Mold Check
x
Comparisons
G
122
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
MO
162
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
91G
^
Growth
w
Habit
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.0
1.8
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.5
Estimated
v
Yield
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.8
2.3
z
Planted June 29.
y
Average scores based on LS means; 1-10 scale with 1 = low incidence, no symptoms obvserved and 10 = high incidence,
all plants in plot dead.
x
** indicates significantly better than this check (p<0.05); ^ indicates significantly worse than this check (p<0.05).
w
Scores based on a 1-4 scale with 1 = prostrate and 4 = upright.
v
Scores based on a 0-4 scale with 0 = no yield and 4 = high yield.
u
Average of 5, 7, 6, and 6 plots per rep respectively.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 16. Comparison of white mold field averages, seven years combined, Corvallis, 2006.
Entry
L192
NY2-5984-1
NYBS6637
PI290990-4-1
PI207130-2-4
MO 162
NY5972
NY1-6020-5
G122
NYBS6643
H9658-9
NY1-6020-4
FR 266
Ex Rico
5630
5613
OR 54
91G
Grand AV
LSD @ .05
2000
1.5
2.0
1.3
2.5
1.5
1.0
1.3
2.8
2.0
1.8
2.0
3.0
3.8
5.0
5.3
6.8
7.5
7.8
3.3
White Mold Field Score Averages
2001
2002
2003
1.1
2.5
1.3
1.5
3.3
2.3
1.8
3.8
1.7
2.3
3.0
2.0
2.4
4.0
3.0
1.1
3.3
3.3
1.6
3.3
2.7
1.5
4.5
1.7
1.5
4.0
2.0
1.6
4.3
1.0
2.1
4.5
4.3
2.6
4.8
2.3
2.3
6.0
1.7
4.1
7.0
4.3
7.3
8.8
6.0
6.5
9.0
6.0
6.8
9.0
6.0
8.3
8.3
7.2
3.1
5.2
3.3
z
z
2004
4.0
3.0
2.3
2.0
2.8
2.8
3.8
2.3
5.8
6.5
3.0
3.5
6.8
7.3
9.3
10.0
10.0
9.8
5.3
2005
2.5
1.5
2.5
3.0
1.8
3.3
2.5
2.5
2.5
1.5
2.5
2.5
3.5
5.3
5.8
6.3
7.8
6.8
3.5
1.0
2006
2.3
2.5
3.1
1.8
1.7
2.5
2.8
2.8
2.0
3.8
3.0
3.0
3.3
5.0
6.3
5.8
7.0
6.8
5.5
1.3
White mold scores: 1-10, 1 = low incidence, no symptoms observed, 10 = high incidence, all plants in plot infected.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Overall
AV
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.8
2.9
3.1
3.1
3.9
5.4
6.9
7.2
7.7
7.8
4.2
0.9
Table 17. Comparison of white mold field averages, two years combined,
Corvallis, 2006.
Entry
PI207130-2-4
NY2-5984-1
6229
G122
L192
PI290990-4-1
NY1-6020-5
NY5972
NYBS6643
6230
H9658-9
NY1-6020-4
NYBS6637
6256
6267
MO 162
Medina
FR 266
Savannah
6239
6263
6235
6262
6258
6259
6283
6393
Ex Rico
6288
6257
6290
6286
6300
5613
5630
6284
6313
6346
6348
6375
6241
6338
91G
2005
1.8
1.5
1.5
2.5
2.5
3.0
2.5
2.5
1.5
2.3
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.3
3.3
2.0
3.5
2.5
3.3
3.8
4.3
4.8
3.8
4.5
5.5
4.8
5.3
5.8
5.0
6.0
5.3
6.5
6.3
5.8
6.0
6.5
5.5
6.5
6.0
6.0
6.8
6.8
2006
1.7
2.5
2.8
2.0
2.3
1.8
2.8
2.8
3.8
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.1
3.3
3.5
2.5
4.0
3.3
4.3
3.8
3.3
3.5
4.3
5.5
5.3
4.5
5.5
5.0
5.0
6.0
5.3
6.5
5.3
5.8
6.3
6.3
5.8
6.8
5.8
6.3
6.8
6.0
6.8
Overall
AV
1.7
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.9
4.5
4.6
4.9
5.0
5.1
5.1
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.9
5.9
6.0
6.0
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.4
6.4
6.8
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 17. Comparison of white mold field averages, two years combined,
Corvallis, 2006 (cont.)
Entry
6318
6323
6340
6342
6347
Ore 54
Spinel
Grand AV
LSD @ .05
2005
6.8
6.8
7.3
7.5
7.3
7.8
8.0
4.5
1.0
2006
7.0
7.0
6.8
6.5
6.8
7.0
7.8
5.5
1.3
Overall
AV
6.9
6.9
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.4
7.9
5.0
1.3
z
White mold scores: 1-10, 1 = low incidence, no symptoms observed, 10 = high
incidence, all plants in plot infected.
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 18. LS means for a 91G x PI255956 BC2F5 population from a field
z
white mold disease screening trial, Corvallis, 2006.
x
Line
G122
MO162
OR 91G
OR 5630
WMGx25 18-1
WMGx25 13-14
WMGx25 13-8
WMGx25 20-2
WMGx25 20-3
WMGx25 6-2
WMGx25 2-6
WMGx25 44-3
WMGx25 6-3
WMGx25 6-9
WMGx25 48-5
WMGx25 13-11
WMGx25 45-1
WMGx25 15-1
WMGx25 21-1
WMGx25 4-1
WMGx25 29-9
WMGx25 46-6
WMGx25 11-4
WMGx25 5-15
WMGx25 6-1
WMGx25 10-4
WMGx25 38-5
WMGx25 38-6
WMGx25 41-2
WMGx25 44-4
WMGx25 47-3
WMGx25 12-3
WMGx25 31-1
WMGx25 41-7
WMGx25 49-2
WMGx25 48-4
WMGx25 3-12
WMGx25 3-15
WMGx25 7-8
WMGx25 14-9
WMGx25 17-4
WMGx25 39-3
y
LS Mean
2.25
2.68
6.88
7.00
2.06
3.04
3.04
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.31
3.54
3.54
3.54
3.64
3.98
3.98
4.04
4.04
4.04
4.06
4.06
4.31
4.31
4.50
4.54
4.54
4.54
4.54
4.54
4.54
4.64
4.64
4.64
4.64
5.00
5.04
5.04
5.04
5.06
5.06
5.06
Comparison to Checks
OR
G122
MO162
91G
OR 5630
X
**
**
X
**
**
**
**
X
**
**
X
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 18. LS means for a 91G x PI255956 BC2F5 population from a field
z
white mold disease screening trial, Corvallis, 200 (cont.).
x
Line
WMGx25 44-5
WMGx25 4-6
WMGx25 46-5
WMGx25 43-3
WMGx25 7-2
WMGx25 19-3
WMGx25 31-6
WMGx25 43-1
WMGx25 26-1
WMGx25 40-1
WMGx25 45-3
WMGx25 47-4
WMGx25 6-7
WMGx25 9-10
WMGx25 19-5
WMGx25 33-1
WMGx25 34-1
WMGx25 45-2
WMGx25 1-11
WMGx25 25-6
WMGx25 40-3
WMGx25 49-5
WMGx25 21-5
WMGx25 25-3
WMGx25 36-1
WMGx25 50-5
WMGx25 11-1
WMGx25 12-5
WMGx25 1-7
WMGx25 3-2
WMGx25 39-4
WMGx25 48-3
WMGx25 8-2
WMGx25 9-13
WMGx25 1-1
WMGx25 27-13
WMGx25 3-18
WMGx25 25-1
WMGx25 27-3
WMGx25 31-3
WMGx25 41-11
WMGx25 4-4
y
LS Mean
5.06
5.31
5.31
5.50
5.50
5.54
5.54
5.54
5.64
5.64
5.64
5.64
5.64
5.75
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.98
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.04
6.04
6.04
6.04
6.06
6.06
6.06
6.06
6.06
6.06
6.06
6.06
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.31
6.31
6.31
6.31
6.31
Comparison to Checks
G122
MO162
91G OSU5630
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 18. LS means for a 91G x PI255956 BC2F5 population from a field
z
white mold disease screening trial, Corvallis, 200 (cont.).
x
Comparison to Checks
Line
LS Mean
G122
MO162
91G OSU5630
WMGx25 9-16
6.38
**
**
WMGx25 12-2
6.54
**
**
WMGx25 2-5
6.54
**
**
WMGx25 42-1
6.54
**
**
WMGx25 42-3
6.54
**
**
WMGx25 8-1
6.54
**
**
WMGx25 8-3
6.54
**
**
WMGx25 19-10
6.64
**
**
WMGx25 35-7
6.64
**
**
WMGx25 24-7
6.98
**
**
WMGx25 27-1
6.98
**
**
WMGx25 36-4
6.98
**
**
WMGx25 43-4
6.98
**
**
WMGx25 50-3
6.98
**
**
WMGx25 7-15
7.01
**
**
WMGx25 20-8
7.04
**
**
WMGx25 26-3
7.04
**
**
WMGx25 3-3
7.04
**
**
WMGx25 24-4
7.06
**
**
WMGx25 28-1
7.06
**
**
WMGx25 38-3
7.06
**
**
WMGx25 24-1
7.25
**
**
WMGx25 40-6
7.31
**
**
WMGx25 17-6
7.54
**
**
WMGx25 28-4
8.04
**
**
WMGx25 42-5
8.04
**
**
WMGx25 10-15
8.06
**
**
z
Planted June 28. 91G x PI 255956 is a Phaseolus vulgaris x Phaseolus cocy
cineus interspecific cross. Scores based on a scale of 1-10 where 1 is highly
x
resistant. ** indicates statistically significantly different from this check at p <
0.05
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 19. LS means from an oxalate screening test of a 91G x PI 255956
z
population, Corvallis, 2006
Comparison to Checks
Line
PI 255956
WMGx25 913
WMGx25 851
WMGx25 903
WMGx25 919
G122
WMGx25 879
WMGx25 849
WMGx25 908
WMGx25 912
WMGx25 917
MO162
WMGx25 800
WMGx25 918
WMGx25 784
WMGx25 856
WMGx25 860
WMGx25 861
WMGx25 878
WMGx25 790
WMGx25 805
WMGx25 859
WMGx25 802
WMGx25 826
WMGx25 883
NY6020-5
WMGx25 771
WMGx25 772
WMGx25 799
WMGx25 808
WMGx25 812
WMGx25 847
WMGx25 884
WMGx25 759
WMGx25 779
WMGx25 810
WMGx25 821
WMGx25 823
WMGx25 839
WMGx25 782
WMGx25 780
WMGx25 818
y
LS Mean
0.07
1.25
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.63
2.00
2.25
2.25
2.25
2.25
2.66
2.75
2.75
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.08
4.25
4.25
PI 255956
X
G122
MO162
**
X
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
x
NY6020-5
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
X
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
X
**
**
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
OR
91G
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Table 19. LS means from an oxalate screening test of a 91G x PI 255956
z
population, Corvallis, 2006 (cont)
Comparison to Checks
Line
WMGx25 834
WMGx25 850
WMGx25 817
WMGx25 885
OR 91G
WMGx25 763
WMGx25 789
WMGx25 797
WMGx25 804
WMGx25 832
WMGx25 854
WMGx25 889
WMGx25 902
WMGx25 905
WMGx25 807
WMGx25 809
WMGx25 814
WMGx25 822
WMGx25 831
WMGx25 896
WMGx25 901
WMGx25 915
WMGx25 920
WMGx25 762
WMGx25 764
WMGx25 766
WMGx25 769
WMGx25 770
WMGx25 774
WMGx25 778
WMGx25 819
WMGx25 830
WMGx25 841
WMGx25 848
WMGx25 857
WMGx25 880
WMGx25 881
WMGx25 886
WMGx25 906
WMGx25 757
WMGx25 803
WMGx25 806
Mean
4.25
4.25
4.35
4.44
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.75
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.25
5.25
5.25
y
PI 255956
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
G122
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
MO162
**
**
x
NY6020-5
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
OR
91G
X
Table 19. LS means from an oxalate screening test of a 91G x PI 255956
z
population, Corvallis, 2006 (cont)
Comparison to Checks
Line
WMGx25 816
WMGx25 835
WMGx25 837
WMGx25 840
WMGx25 846
WMGx25 855
WMGx25 900
WMGx25 761
WMGx25 815
WMGx25 838
WMGx25 852
WMGx25 760
WMGx25 777
WMGx25 827
WMGx25 828
WMGx25 844
WMGx25 897
WMGx25 904
WMGx25 781
WMGx25 813
WMGx25 836
WMGx25 768
WMGx25 792
WMGx25 798
WMGx25 811
WMGx25 833
WMGx25 894
WMGx25 824
WMGx25 825
WMGx25 853
WMGx25 845
Mean
5.25
5.25
5.25
5.25
5.25
5.25
5.25
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.75
5.75
5.75
5.75
5.75
5.75
5.75
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.50
6.75
6.75
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.25
y
PI 255956
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
G122
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
MO162
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
x
NY6020-5
OR
91G
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
z
91G x PI 255956 is a Phaseolus vulgaris x Phaseolus coccineus interspecific
cross.
y
Scores based on a scale of 0-9 where 0 is no symptoms and 9 is total plant collapse.
x
** indicates statistically significantly different from this check at p < 0.05
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 20. LS means from an oxalate screening test of white mold resistant
and susceptible Phaseolus vulgaris lines, Corvallis, 2006
y
Line
Cornell 605
L192
Maverick
VA-19
G122
Cornell 501
Cornell 603
Cornell 604
MO159
PC50
NY6020-4
Aztec
MO162
NY6020-5
OR 5630
Winchester
A55
Benton
Matterhorn
MO061
Othello
Ex Rico
I9365-25
XAN-159
Minuette
OR 91G
Montrose
ND88-10604
Raven
BO5003
I9365-31
Asher
Comparison to Checks
NY6020G122
4
OR 91G
**
**
**
**
**
X
**
LS
z
Mean
2.33
2.67
3.00
3.00
3.33
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.08
4.33
4.33
4.33
4.33
4.67
4.67
4.67
4.84
5.00
5.00
Cornell
605
X
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
5.00
5.00
5.33
5.33
5.67
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Asher
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
X
**
X
**
z
X
Plants were rated on a scale of 0-9 where 0 = no symptoms and 9 = total plant
collapse
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Table 21. Heat tolerance ratings from a bean trial at Hermiston, Oregon, 2006
Entry
OR 91G
OR 54
Savannah
Sahara (ck)
Concesa
OR 190
OR 2065
OR 1604M
OR 1604B
OR 17
OR 43
OR 58
OR 58R
OR 83
4911
5022-1
5024-1-9
5061
5062
5073
5078
5090
5097B
5163
5256
5446-1
5613
5620
5630
5635
5651
5669
5835
5977
5981
5989
5996
5998
6002-6-2
6002-15
6002-30
6100-1
6104
6125
Heat Tolerany
ce
3
5
3
4
2
5
5
3
3
5
3
3
4
5
3
4
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
5
2
2
5
4
3
5
4
3
3
6
1
3
4
1
3
3
5
4
4
3
x
Yield
8
8
5
7
4
8
6
5
5
6
6
4
5
7
6
6
5
7
5
5
5
4
4
7
5
5
6
5
5
7
6
6
4
7
3
5
6
3
3
5
6
7
5
6
Notes
Poor stand
Poor stand
Late
Very late
Poor stand; high yield
Late
2 plants
Pollywogs
Pollywogs
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
2 plants
Pollywogs
3 plants
Very late; large empty pods; leafy
Poor stand
Leafy
Poor stand
2 plants
1 plant
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 21. Heat tolerance ratings from a bean trial at Hermiston, Oregon, 2006 (cont)
Entry
6127
6131
6137
6142
6150
6154
6174
6175
6185
6186
6189
6193
6207
6212
6213
6215
6229
6230
6231
6232
6235
6239
6241
6256
6257
6258
6259
6260
6262
6263
6267
6268
6274
6279
6280
6283
6284
6286
6287
6288
6290
6300
6312-6
6313
Heat Tolerany
ce
2
3
5
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
2
2
3
5
3
6
4
4
3
3
2
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
5
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
x
Yield
5
5
5
5
5
4
6
7
5
6
5
2
3
5
7
3
5
3
5
4
4
4
4
4
7
6
6
5
6
6
4
5
5
4
6
5
5
6
6
7
5
5
5
6
Notes
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
1 plant
Late
Late
1 plant
Pollywogs
Pollywogs
4 plants
High fiber
High fiber; poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Short pods
Poor stand; fish hooks
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand; high fiber; fish hooks
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Floppy plants
2 plants
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 21. Heat tolerance ratings from a bean trial at Hermiston, Oregon, 2006 (cont)
Entry
6318
6323
6329
6338
6340
6342
6343
6347
6348
6375
6393
6405
6406
6407
6408
6409
6410
6411
6412
6413
6414
6415
6416
6417
6418
6419
6420
6421
6422
6423
6424
6425
6426
6427
6428
6429
6430
6432
6433
6434
6436
6437
6438
6439
Heat Tolerany
ce
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
3
2
3
3
4
2
5
4
3
5
3
6
4
5
5
6
7
6
5
5
5
3
3
5
5
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
x
Yield
5
4
4
4
6
5
5
4
4
7
7
3
6
6
7
4
5
7
6
3
6
5
4
5
6
7
7
6
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
4
5
6
5
4
5
5
Notes
Very poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Poor stand
Very poor stand
Poor stand; late; fish hooks
Late
Very poor stand
Very poor stand
Very poor stand
Very early; short pods
Very poor stand
Leafy
1 plant
1 plant
Poor stand
1 plant
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 21. Heat tolerance ratings from a bean trial at Hermiston, Oregon, 2006 (cont)
Entry
6440
6441
6442
6443
6444
6445
6446
6447
6448
6450
6453
6454
6455
6457
6458
6459
6460
6461
6462
6464
6465
6466
6467
6468
6470
6472
6473
6474
6475
6476
6477
6478
6479
6480
6481
6483
6484
6485
6486
6487
6488
6489
6490
6491
Heat Tolerany
ce
3
3
2
3
2
2
1
3
3
3
3
2
5
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
4
5
4
2
4
6
3
2
2
4
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
x
Yield
5
4
4
4
5
4
1
4
4
4
4
5
7
4
4
5
6
5
6
4
2
4
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
5
7
Notes
1 plant
Very poor stand
Poor stand
Very poor stand
Dwarf plants
Segregating for persistant green
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 21. Heat tolerance ratings from a bean trial at Hermiston, Oregon, 2006 (cont)
Entry
6492
6493
6494
6495
6497
6498
6499
6501
6503
6504
6505
6506
6507
6508
6509
6510
6511
6512
6513
6516
6518
6519
6522
6523
6528
6530
6533
6534
6537
6542
Heat Tolerany
ce
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
7
7
7
6
4
6
6
8
4
4
4
4
3
5
6
4
5
4
5
5
8
Yield
6
5
3
4
5
5
6
5
3
6
6
8
6
5
6
7
8
4
6
6
5
4
7
6
5
6
5
6
7
8
6543
6544
6550
6551
6552
6553
6554
6555
6556
6557
6559
6560
6562
5
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
6
7
7
6
6
5
7
5
6
6
7
6
6
x
Notes
Segregating for persistant green
Very poor stand
1 plant
Late
3 plants
1 plant
Very poor stand; fish hooks
2 plants
2 plants; segregating for persistant green
and sieve size
2 plants
Poor stand
Poor stand
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
z
Table 21. Heat tolerance ratings from a bean trial at Hermiston, Oregon, 2006 (cont)
Entry
6563
6564
6565
6567
6568
6569
6570
6571
6572
6573
6574
6575
6578
6579
6580
6581
6582
6583
6584
6585
6586
6587
6588
6589
6590
6591
6592
6593
6594
6595
Heat Tolerany
ce
1
3
8
6
7
6
5
5
6
8
7
8
7
6
7
8
6
5
6
1
5
6
5
5
7
7
6
5
6
7
x
Yield
1
5
7
6
7
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
6
7
6
2
4
7
6
7
7
7
6
6
6
7
z
Notes
Poor stand; dwarf plants
1 plant
Poor stand
Late
2 plants
1 plant
Long pods
Poor stand
2 plants
z
Planted May 16.
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 = excellent heat tolerance; scores greater than 6 indicate
good heat tolerance.
x
Scores based on a 1-9 scale with 9 = high yield.
y
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
Figure 1. Commercial Bean $/A 2006 - Full Sieve Varieties
1400
1252
1190
1165
1200
1107
1077
1015
953
964
6189
91G
1000
804
$/A
800
600
487
400
200
0
6230
6185
6137
OR 54
5669
5630
SB 4285
BB 519
Variety
Figure 2. Commercial Bean $/A 2006 - Small Sieve Varieties
1400
1180
1200
1108
1086
1052
1015
1000
960
934
878
835
820
783
771
800
673
$/A
672
600
400
174
200
2 to 3 sieve
2006-2007 Green Bean Breeding Progress Report
5%
@
LS
D
uc
at
o
eo
D
of
Tr
ar
a
ah
in
Ba
cc
87
B
G
M
ed
on
ay
t
St
nn
ah
sa
4 sieve
Sa
va
51
4
on
ce
C
BB
51
3
BB
22
00
4
86
C
BB
52
0
BS
BB
BB
42
0
0