Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
1. Introduction
2.
3. Criteria for the Award of Higher Doctorates
Page
3
3
4. Applications and Admissions
4.1 Preliminary approval
4.2 Fees
5.
6. Submission
3
3
4
5
6.1
6.2
Format of the thesis
Language
6.3
6.4 Footnotes
6.5 of
5
7 thesis
7
7
6.6 Non-print items
6.7 Submitting thesis
7. The Examiners
8
8
8
7.1 Criteria for appointment of examiners
7.2 examiners
9
9
7.3
8. Duties of the Chair and Examiners
8.1
8.2
9.
Chair
Duties of the external examiners
Recommendations Available to Examiners
9
10
10
10. Fees and Expenses
11. Approval and Notification of Results
Annex 1: Key contacts for applicants
Annex 2: Process diagram
Annex
Annex 4: Sample declaration
11
11
12
13
15
Page 2 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS MAY RESULT IN THE
FACULTY REJECTING THE THESIS FOR EXAMINATION
This document outlines the application, submission and examination procedures for the award of Higher Doctorates at The University of Manchester. If you have any queries which are not answered here, please contact the appropriate graduate office (see Annex 1).
The University of Manchester's Ordinances and Regulations for Higher Doctorates state that candidates must be: a. graduates, other than honorary, of this University, of at least seven years' standing from award of the degree of Bachelor, or six years from award of the degree of Master, or four years from award of the degree of Doctor of
Philosophy. Candidates should note that this is a minimum requirement and that this would not normally be considered sufficient time for the required standard to be reached. or b. if not graduates of this University, have been a member or honorary member of the academic, research or academic related staff of the
University for a period of at least four years. For the degrees of Doctor of
Medical Science (DMedSci) and Doctor of Dental Science (DDSc) only, members of staff at the University's associated hospitals and institutes for at least this period are also eligible. All such candidates must also hold a degree or equivalent qualification approved by the University.
The appropriate graduate office is responsible for checking candidates' eligibility for the award.
Candidates are required to show that they have made an original and substantial contribution to a major field of study. The published work submitted for a
Higher Doctorate must demonstrate that the candidate is a leading authority in their field, and has been involved in major innovations and new developments in that field.
4.1 Preliminary approval
Intending applicants are required to obtain preliminary approval from the
University to apply for a Higher Doctorate. The purpose of this is to ensure that intending applicants are eligible to apply for the degree, can make a prima facie
Page 3 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007 case for its award, and can present appropriate published material in a suitable manner, before preparing their formal submission.
Candidates should check whether there are any application deadlines with the appropriate graduate office.
The prima facie case must include: a.
a statement about the nature and extent of the candidate's contribution to their field of study; b.
a list of the publications the candidate intends to submit; and c.
a brief curriculum vitae.
These documents should be submitted to the appropriate graduate office (see
Appendix 1) for consideration.
Normally, only work published in scholarly books and journals will be eligible for consideration. However, the examiners may, at their discretion, take into consideration other scholarly work. All work must be traceable in ordinary catalogues and must have been published in such a way as to be generally available for consultation by scholars or other interested persons.
A special panel must be convened to assess whether there is a prima facie case for the award. This panel will normally be chaired by the Associate Dean for
Graduate Education of the appropriate Faculty, or his/her nominee, and include other senior members of academic staff. Where possible, an appropriate member of staff from another Faculty should also be included.
If the University accepts that a prima facie case has been established, candidates will be notified in writing that they will be offered registration to submit for a Higher Doctorate and an adviser will be appointed to act as an internal contact and provide guidance where necessary. Candidates must submit their published work for examination within 12 months of their registration for the degree.
If the prima facie case is not upheld, candidates may not put forward a new
prima facie case until a period of 24 months has elapsed since their original application.
4.2 Fees
Once preliminary approval has been granted, candidates will be invited by the appropriate Faculty to submit their work, accompanied by the prescribed fee.
Candidates should contact the appropriate graduate office for details of fees.
Candidates should give at least three months' written notice to the appropriate graduate office of their intention to submit their Higher Doctorate for examination. Notice of Submission Forms are available from the appropriate graduate office.
Page 4 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
6.1 Format of the thesis
The thesis shall comprise the following items presented in the order given:
a. Title page which must give the following information (see Annex 3 for a sample):
• the full title of the thesis;
• a statement as follows: ‘A thesis submitted to the University of
Manchester for the degree of xxx in the Faculty of ............’ (please refer to University Regulation X for a list of correct Faculty and School titles and refer to University Regulation XI for the correct long and short
form of the degree title. Both sets of Regulations can be found at: http://www.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/governance/generalregulatio
ns.pdf);
• candidate's name and qualifications;
• the year of submission.
b. Contents list. A list of contents, giving all appropriate sub-divisions of the thesis and a page number for each item.
In a multi-volume thesis the contents page in the first volume must show the complete contents of the thesis, volume by volume, and each subsequent volume must have a contents page giving the contents of that volume
c. Abstract. A short abstract of the contents of the thesis must be inserted into the work. The abstract must be typed using a font size of not less than 12 point, with single spacing, and must not exceed more than one side of A4. A loose copy of the abstract is also required and must be handed in with the candidate's submission.
The abstract should include the following information:
• Name of the University (The University of Manchester);
• The Candidate's full name;
• Degree Title;
• Title of the submission;
• Year.
d. Declaration (see sample in Annex 4). A declaration must be completed and bound in with the candidate's thesis. This declaration requires the candidate to state: i.
the nature and extent of the candidate's own contribution and the contribution of co-authors and other collaborators to each of the publications presented; ii.
whether any (and if so, which) of the work presented has been submitted in support of a successful or pending application for any other degree or qualification of this or any other University or of any professional or learned body.
Page 5 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
e. Copyright statement – The following four notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights must be included as written below: i.
The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the "Copyright") and s/he has given The University of Manchester the right to use such Copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes. ii.
Copies of this thesis, either in full or in extracts, may be made only in accordance with the regulations of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester. Details of these regulations may be obtained from the
Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. iii.
The ownership of any patents, designs, trade marks and any and all other intellectual property rights except for the Copyright (the
"Intellectual Property Rights") and any reproductions of copyright works, for example graphs and tables ("Reproductions"), which may be described in this thesis, may not be owned by the author and may be owned by third parties. Such Intellectual Property Rights and
Reproductions cannot and must not be made available for use without the prior written permission of the owner(s) of the relevant Intellectual
Property Rights and/or Reproductions. iv.
Further information on the conditions under which disclosure, publication and exploitation of this thesis, the Copyright and any
Intellectual Property Rights and/or Reproductions described in it may take place is available from the Head of School of (insert name of
school) (or the Vice-President) and the Dean of the Faculty of Life
Sciences, for Faculty of Life Sciences’ candidates.
f. Statement containing: i.
particulars of the candidate's degrees, other qualifications and research experience, including all particulars required to establish eligibility under the University's regulations; ii.
a complete and numbered list of the publications submitted (grouped according to subject and type); iii.
an overall summary (maximum 15,000 words) of the aims and achievement of the work, for which the publications submitted give evidence, which should outline their interrelationship and include reference to the work of others in the candidate's field. This critical appraisal of the work should review the current state of knowledge and research in the candidate's field, and indicate how their work has contributed to that field. It should also comment on the standard of any journals and the reception of the publications as indicated by citations and reviews.
g. Copies of each of the publications in its published form. The number of papers included in a Higher Doctorate thesis may vary according to discipline and is not prescribed.
Page 6 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
6.2 Language
Higher Doctorate theses must normally be in English. Brief quotations may be made in foreign languages. In exceptional circumstances variation of this requirement may be approved by the University for candidates to submit work predominantly in their language of research.
6.3 Presentation of the thesis
The statement and other preliminary pages must be typed or produced on a word processor using a printer which produces letter quality print. Double or 1.5 spacing with a minimum font size of 12 in a sans serif font type such as arial, verdana, tahoma or trebuchet, must be used for the main text; single-spacing may be used for quotations, footnotes and references.
The statement and other preliminary pages must be presented on good quality
A4 paper. Candidates may use both sides of the paper.
The margins must be wide enough to allow for binding. The minimum requirement is: inside margin, 40mm; top and outside margins, 15mm; bottom margin, 15mm.
Page numbering must consist of one single sequence of Arabic numerals (ie 1, 2,
3 … ) throughout the thesis, starting with the title page and must extend to cover all volumes in a multi-volume work. Roman numerals must not be used for page numbering.
Note on numbering the pages of the publications section:
Since the thesis for a Higher Doctorate includes copies or offprints of journal articles, book chapters etc, which already have page numbers, the pages of the publications themselves will not be included in the pagination sequence of the submission. Candidates should insert a sheet of A4 before each publication on which is displayed the publication number, publication title, and the page number of the thesis.
For example, if the publications section starts on p75, insert an A4 sheet before the first publication on which is printed the name and number of the publication and p75. The first publication will then follow, with its own pagination. Before the second publication insert another A4 sheet on which is printed the name and number of the second publication and p76, and so on.
6.4 Footnotes
Candidates may position their footnotes at the bottom of a page, at the end of each chapter, or at the end of the Higher Doctorate thesis.
6.5 Binding the thesis
The thesis shall be submitted in standard hard-binding: sewn, with gold lettering on the spine. Items, such as books, which cannot be included in a bound volume may be submitted separately; three clearly identified copies of such items must be submitted. If candidates are awarded a Higher Doctorate, these items will be kept by the University Library.
Page 7 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
The wording on the spine must show:
• the degree for which the thesis is submitted;
• the name of the candidate;
• the year of submission; and,
• if the thesis is in two or more volumes, the volume number and the total number of volumes (please note that it is not recommended that any single volume of a thesis is thicker than approximately 6cm - if it is greater than this, it is recommended that the work is split into two or
more volumes.)
These must run from the top of the spine. Please note that writing on the spine with a gold pen is NOT acceptable.
Example of Spine:
DSc
(at top)
Front Cover
GILBERT K
CHESTERTON
(centred)
Vol I of II
(as and if appropriate)
2007
(at
bottom)
Back Cover
6.6 Non-print items
Candidates should ensure that any non-print items (eg video or audio tapes, computer software etc) are of good quality and able to be stored without excessive deterioration. If candidates are awarded a Higher Doctorate, these items will be kept by the University Library.
6.7 Submitting the thesis
A Submission Form, available from the appropriate graduate office, must be completed and handed in with the thesis.
Candidates must submit three copies of both the thesis and any additional material, as well as one loose copy of the abstract.
When the candidate submits the thesis it is forwarded to the examiners by the appropriate graduate office.
The examination process is overseen by an independent, internal Chair, normally the candidate's adviser.
There must be two external examiners. The examiners must be approved by the appropriate research degrees panel. Once the examiners have been approved, the appropriate graduate office will send formal offers of appointment to the examiners and give their details to the candidate.
Page 8 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
7.1 Criteria for appointment of examiners should: a.
be qualified and experienced in the candidate's field. Where possible, examiners should hold a Higher Doctorate; and b.
have considerable experience of supervising and examining research degree students.
The Associate Vice-President for Graduate Education will consider exceptions to the normal criteria if a case is made by the appropriate Faculty Dean at the nomination stage.
Examiners should be senior members of academic staff, and one of them should, where possible, be from an overseas university.
Examiners should be entirely independent of the candidate and each other, and should declare an interest if they: a.
plan to employ the candidate; b.
plan to co-publish with the candidate; c.
are, or have been, involved with the candidate in a close personal relationship of any kind; d.
have a close personal, professional or contractual relationship with any other member of the examination panel.
7.2 Nomination of examiners
When the appropriate graduate office receives notification of the candidate's intention to submit for examination, the Head of the appropriate academic unit is asked to nominate examiners. Nominations for examiners should be made on the Nomination of Examiners Form which is available from the appropriate graduate office.
7.3 Informal approaches to potential examiners
The Head of the appropriate academic unit, or an appropriate delegate such as a senior Professor in the sub-field of the candidate's research, is advised to approach potential examiners before making a formal nomination to check that they are willing and available to examine the Higher Doctorate.
Higher Doctorate examinations are normally conducted by correspondence. If an examiners' meeting is necessary (see below), arrangements for the meeting are made by the Chair.
Page 9 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
8.1 Duties of the Chair
The duties of the Chair are: a.
to ensure that the examination process is conducted in accordance with
University regulations and procedures; b.
to chair the examiners' meeting(s) if held; c.
to ensure that an Examiners' Report Form is completed and signed by each examiner. This should include a brief report on the submission and a recommendation as to the award or otherwise of the degree; d.
to send or bring the completed Examiners' Report Forms to the appropriate graduate office.
8.2 Duties of the external examiners
The duties of the external examiners are: a.
to assess whether the candidate has met the requirements of the appropriate Higher Doctorate and to make a recommendation on the award of the degree by completing an Examiners' Report Form; b.
if a meeting of the examiners is held, to make a recommendation on the award of the degree along with the other examiner(s); c.
ensure that all examination copies of the Higher Doctorate submission are returned promptly to the appropriate graduate office at the end of the examination process.
Each examiner is required to complete a separate Examiners' Report Form and make a recommendation about the award of the Higher Doctorate to the appropriate research degrees panel.
The examiners may recommend: a.
the award of the Higher Doctorate b.
that the Higher Doctorate is not awarded (in which case any new application would require re-registration and a substantially new submission).
The appropriate research degrees panel considers the reports and ratifies the examiners' recommendation. If the recommendations made by the individual examiners differ, a meeting of the examiners is held. If, after a meeting, one examiner recommends that a Higher Doctorate should not be awarded to the candidate, the appropriate research degrees panel will appoint an additional external examiner who will not meet the original examiners or have access to their reports.
Page 10 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
Candidates who are not awarded the Higher Doctorate must be given feedback from the examiners.
If the recommendation is that the Higher Doctorate is not awarded, candidates may not resubmit for the award until a period of 24 months has elapsed since their original application. Candidates will not normally be expected to re-apply for preliminary approval.
Fee levels for external examiners are determined by the University from year to year and are specified in the examiners' appointment offer letter. Fees are paid once the examiners' recommendation has been ratified by the research degrees committee.
Higher Doctorate examinations are normally conducted by correspondence but if a meeting of the examiners is necessary, travel is reimbursed for the actual
cost of standard class public transport. Approval for travel by car will be granted if the use of public transport is genuinely not possible; a full explanation must be provided. All claims should be made on University claim forms.
Expenses should be claimed within two months of the expenditure being incurred.
The decision about the award of the Higher Doctorate is taken by the appropriate research degrees panel on the basis of the examiners' reports and the recommendation made by the examiners.
When the research degrees panel has made its decision, the candidate is notified. The letter, together with a copy of the examiners' reports, is also sent to: a.
the examiners b.
the adviser c.
the Head of the appropriate academic unit d.
the member(s) of academic staff who recommended the prima facie case.
Page 11 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
For Doctor of Science (DSc):
Graduate Administrator
Research Office
The University of Manchester
2 nd Floor, Christie Building
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL
Note: In the case of the DSc, the Research Office will pass the candidate's CV and list of publications on to the appropriate Faculty, which will then be responsible for granting preliminary approval and continuing the application process.
Doctor of Engineering (DEng):
Head of Graduate Education
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences
C4, Sackville Street Building
The University of Manchester
Sackville Street
Manchester M60 1QD
For Doctor of Letters (LittD), Doctor of Laws (LLD), Doctor of Music
(MusD), Doctor of Divinity (DD), and Doctor of Social Science
(DSocSc):
Head of Academic Services
Faculty of Humanities
Devonshire House
The University of Manchester
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL
For Doctor of Medical Science (DMedSc) and Doctor of Dental Science
(DDSc):
Graduate Education Manager
Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences
Chisholm Building
The University of Manchester
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL
Page 12 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
Prima facie case: statement, publication list and brief CV
Sent to Faculty or
Centre
Specially convened panel
Successful?
No
Permitted to resubmit after 24 months
Yes
Appoint adviser and register candidate on system
Candidate notified in writing
(allowed 12 months to submit)
Fee paid (where applicable)
Candidate gives at least 3 months’ notice of submission
2 external examiners nominated
Candidate submits 3 copies of thesis plus a loose copy of the abstract
Examination conducted by correspondence
Disagree:
Chair arranges a meeting
PASS
Candidate notified in writing
FAIL
Candidate not permitted to resubmit within next
24 months
Page 13 of 15
Still disagree:
An additional external examiner is appointed

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
TITLE OF THESIS
A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of xxxxxx in the Faculty of ............
YEAR OF SUBMISSION
CANDIDATE'S NAME and QUALIFICATIONS
Page 14 of 15

Guidance for Higher Doctorates
May 2007
University of Manchester
Higher Doctorate Candidate Declaration
Candidate Name:
Faculty:
Higher Doctorate Title:
Declaration to be completed by the candidate:
Please describe briefly:
1.
the nature and extent of your own contribution and the contribution of co-authors and other collaborators to each of the publications presented
2.
whether any (and if so which) of the work presented has been submitted in support of a successful or pending application for any other degree or qualification of this or any other University or of any professional or learned body
I confirm that this is a true statement and that, subject to any comments above, the submission is my own original work.
Signed: ………………………………………………..……….. Date: ……………..……..………………
Page 15 of 15